NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 495886 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 495886 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1017.8367 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 547.7834 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1019.0079 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 547.0697 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.9092 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-17T00:36:53.5956074' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-17T05:36:53.5956074' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61177.2339536459 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-17T05:37:03.4997354' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61177.2340682754 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.995883641852 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9998337291902 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.3458333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 335.604444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.6457589896752 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29476 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29476 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 891.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 40.303224 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 20.901672 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits :) Spent 0.535555 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-17T00:37:41.4044395' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-17T05:37:41.4044395' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61177.2345069908 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-17T05:37:51.3084991' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61177.2346216203 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.995883746878 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9998337437072 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.2769444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 335.6 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.64834418049548 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29476 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29476 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 891.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 40.303224 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 20.901672 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits :) Spent 0.522910 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.73406939 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:36.630 +69:58:22.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:36.630 +69:58:22.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0276 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:33.969 +69:58:31.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:33.969 +69:58:31.33 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:36.630 +69:58:22.97 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:33.969 +69:58:31.33 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00445 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dW7UEKjbav Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SLgwcG9D4V Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3bpZuFOLyp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o5MFap4Kr0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5136 out of 5418 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5418 out of 8894 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 15.1 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 15.1 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dW7UEKjbav (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, passed=8779 Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=198 n_q2=294 n_q3=212 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.SLgwcG9D4V (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, passed=8894 Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=199 n_q2=283 n_q3=224 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.3bpZuFOLyp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=493, passed=8168 Got 8168 stars (including 7663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8168 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8118 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8118 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=227 n_q2=286 n_q3=221 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.010 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.o5MFap4Kr0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=487, passed=8158 Got 8158 stars (including 7660 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8158 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8105 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8105 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=230 n_q2=283 n_q3=222 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.985 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.330 ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.274 new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.010 new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=0.985 reference average sigma_overall=0.3945 worst_q_ratio=1.302 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:57:08.84 +69:58:07.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:54:37.21 +68:13:19.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:41:53.95 +69:06:36.3: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:51:57.03 +67:08:57.5: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:10:28.49 +70:03:56.7: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:46:46.68 +70:33:07.7: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:36:04.29 +70:18:13.1: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:53:30.57 +71:24:01.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 11:00:07.00 +69:25:02.0: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:55:14.01 +71:46:42.0: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:53:30.57 +71:24:01.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:10:28.49 +70:03:56.7: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:46:46.68 +70:33:07.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:36:04.29 +70:18:13.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:51:57.03 +67:08:57.5: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:54:37.21 +68:13:19.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:57:08.84 +69:58:07.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 11:00:07.00 +69:25:02.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:41:53.95 +69:06:36.3: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:30.57 +71:24:01.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2846 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:28.49 +70:03:56.7: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2803 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:57.03 +67:08:57.5: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3229 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:46:46.68 +70:33:07.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1736 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:04.29 +70:18:13.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2918 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:08.84 +69:58:07.3: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3274 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:37.21 +68:13:19.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3562 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:07.00 +69:25:02.0: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3579 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:53.95 +69:06:36.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3061 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:55:14.01 +71:46:42.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:55:14.01 +71:46:42.0: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3548 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20514_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20514_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    10.84    10:01:20.66 +74:13:23.9   3933 0522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:01:20.69 +74:13:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20787_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20787_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.17    09:46:46.60 +70:33:07.6   4303 2806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.18    09:46:46.76 +70:33:07.8   4300 2807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20810_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20810_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.28    10:10:28.50 +70:03:56.5   3070 2915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.28    10:10:28.49 +70:03:56.8   3068 2916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20811_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20811_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.28    09:53:30.57 +71:24:01.7   4034 2260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.28    09:53:30.57 +71:24:01.5   4031 2261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20814_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20814_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.29    09:36:04.36 +70:18:13.2   4828 2998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.29    09:36:04.21 +70:18:13.1   4826 2999   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20815_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20815_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.29    09:41:53.94 +69:06:36.5   4475 3693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.32    09:41:53.97 +69:06:36.1   4472 3694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20822_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20822_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.32    10:51:57.05 +67:08:57.5   0367 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.32    10:51:57.01 +67:08:57.5   0364 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20827_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20827_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.33    09:57:08.85 +69:58:07.5   3736 3090   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.33    09:57:08.83 +69:58:07.2   3734 3091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20832_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20832_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.35    09:54:37.19 +68:13:19.3   3725 4150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.36    09:54:37.22 +68:13:19.2   3722 4151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20833_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20833_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.35    11:00:07.00 +69:25:01.8   0459 2516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.36    11:00:07.00 +69:25:02.1   0457 2516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20836_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 20836_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    12.36    09:55:14.01 +71:46:42.2   3982 2024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.35    09:55:14.00 +71:46:41.9   3980 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    9.45    10:55:40.14 +71:52:07.8   1240 1229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:55:40.14 +71:52:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    10.97    08:04:00.19 +73:24:29.8   8869 0591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 08:04:00.18 +73:24:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    8.78    10:44:37.70 +68:46:32.0   1105 3183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:44:37.69 +68:46:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:36.630 +69:58:22.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:36.630 +69:58:22.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0276 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:33.969 +69:58:31.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:33.969 +69:58:31.33 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:36.630 +69:58:22.97 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:33.969 +69:58:31.33 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00445 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q55omZfNCa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qK0IJziFN9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.erDpbQ4QRj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Byw6x5KnBT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec +62.8134 to +75.4919 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec 62.8134 to 75.4919 deg Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4857 out of 5495 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5495 out of 51887 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.q55omZfNCa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, passed=51519 Got 51519 stars (including 48800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51061 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=207 n_q2=283 n_q3=214 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qK0IJziFN9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, passed=51863 Got 51863 stars (including 49079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=214 n_q2=275 n_q3=217 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.erDpbQ4QRj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1943, passed=45914 Got 45914 stars (including 43903 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45914 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45502 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45504 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45504 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=239 n_q2=266 n_q3=228 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Byw6x5KnBT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1927, passed=45561 Got 45561 stars (including 43560 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45561 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45159 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45160 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45160 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=232 n_q2=269 n_q3=229 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:59:18.77 +67:23:44.8: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:59:18.77 +67:23:44.8: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:59:18.77 +67:23:44.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1376 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:46:31.71 +65:55:15.5: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:34:45.18 +67:38:06.2: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:51:47.35 +66:54:16.0: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:53:16.76 +73:11:21.1: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:46:31.71 +65:55:15.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:46:31.71 +65:55:15.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0415 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:48:42.19 +66:50:59.8: 15.75 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:34:45.18 +67:38:06.2: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:34:45.18 +67:38:06.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3523 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:51:47.35 +66:54:16.0: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:51:47.35 +66:54:16.0: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3253 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:53:16.76 +73:11:21.1: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:53:16.76 +73:11:21.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4887 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 11:18:53.25 +71:51:17.3: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:53:18.88 +69:03:46.1: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:48:42.19 +66:50:59.8: 15.56 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.19 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:48:42.19 +66:50:59.8: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.6502 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:34:57.45 +65:39:39.0: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 11:18:53.25 +71:51:17.3: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:18:53.25 +71:51:17.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8937 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:53:18.88 +69:03:46.1: 14.99 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:18.88 +69:03:46.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7419 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:54:29.09 +72:44:16.4: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 11:21:29.12 +72:20:24.8: 15.38 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:34:57.45 +65:39:39.0: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:34:57.45 +65:39:39.0: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7622 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:39:17.42 +69:44:25.4: 15.15 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:43:13.66 +70:37:21.8: 15.04 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:16:02.19 +72:27:32.8: 15.47 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:22:25.38 +68:43:47.2: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:54:29.09 +72:44:16.4: 14.87 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:54:29.09 +72:44:16.4: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8628 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 11:21:29.12 +72:20:24.8: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:29.12 +72:20:24.8: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9677 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:39:17.42 +69:44:25.4: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:39:17.42 +69:44:25.4: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9356 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:43:13.66 +70:37:21.8: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:43:13.66 +70:37:21.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7940 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:16:02.19 +72:27:32.8: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:25:34.88 +71:31:55.0: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:16:02.19 +72:27:32.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9161 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:22:25.38 +68:43:47.2: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:22:25.38 +68:43:47.2: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9094 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:09:30.19 +71:36:24.3: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:14:28.95 +67:31:42.0: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:25:34.88 +71:31:55.0: 14.99 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:25:34.88 +71:31:55.0: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8885 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:32:31.37 +72:11:23.9: 15.52 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:09:30.19 +71:36:24.3: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:30.19 +71:36:24.3: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7511 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:35:39.28 +70:28:04.2: 15.54 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:14:28.95 +67:31:42.0: 15.33 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:14:28.95 +67:31:42.0: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7632 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:36:01.30 +66:52:07.5: 15.42 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:34:19.27 +74:06:36.3: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:32:31.37 +72:11:23.9: 15.42 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:32:31.37 +72:11:23.9: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9624 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:35:39.28 +70:28:04.2: 15.49 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:35:39.28 +70:28:04.2: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9607 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:36:01.30 +66:52:07.5: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:36:01.30 +66:52:07.5: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8861 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:34:19.27 +74:06:36.3: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:34:19.27 +74:06:36.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9339 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out66800.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65395_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65395_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    10.94    10:01:20.62 +74:13:23.7   3933 0522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:01:20.63 +74:13:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65643_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65643_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.10    09:42:12.30 +65:28:01.7   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65651_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65651_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.13    10:04:32.94 +67:21:43.3   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65749_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65749_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.52    08:46:18.10 +69:35:23.0   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65789_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65789_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.65    09:50:10.39 +73:05:34.3   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65821_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65821_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.72    09:38:18.09 +64:54:07.8   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65839_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65839_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.95    10:41:49.16 +70:47:24.5   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65878_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65878_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.98    09:22:31.53 +74:53:30.9   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65906_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65906_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    12.98    09:36:26.27 +70:41:06.3   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65981_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 65981_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    13.13    08:59:18.70 +67:23:45.4   6855 4713   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.15    08:59:18.85 +67:23:44.3   6853 4714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66026_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66026_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.47    10:43:36.98 +64:33:04.8   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66041_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66041_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.27    08:46:53.97 +74:28:06.5   6959 0397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 08:46:53.98 +74:28:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66145_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66145_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.67    09:44:10.40 +74:59:18.4   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66208_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66208_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.80    10:19:54.65 +71:09:39.7   2749 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66211_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66211_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.80    10:25:01.51 +64:03:32.6   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66218_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66218_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.73    09:46:28.54 +73:12:08.4   4476 1219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 09:46:28.56 +73:12:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66307_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66307_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.86    09:54:58.31 +65:09:12.7   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66341_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66341_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.88    08:32:05.96 +72:28:04.5   7798 1477   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 08:32:05.95 +72:28:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66406_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66406_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.85    08:17:06.07 +71:45:42.0   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66407_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66407_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.06    09:46:31.60 +65:55:15.3   4034 5586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.03    09:46:31.82 +65:55:15.7   4031 5587   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    13.96    09:06:08.45 +68:26:44.3   6416 4112   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 09:06:08.44 +68:26:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66502_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66502_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.32    09:09:27.10 +69:13:00.9   6209 3658   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 09:09:26.74 +69:13:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66509_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66509_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.28    11:06:50.74 +70:18:38.7   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66545_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66545_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.24    09:25:14.49 +66:19:04.6   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66598_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66598_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.31    10:48:14.07 +67:30:44.5   0649 3836   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:48:14.13 +67:30:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66606_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66606_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.55    10:58:05.35 +72:02:53.9   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66670_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66670_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.40    09:49:15.34 +71:34:35.9   4246 2181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 09:49:15.28 +71:34:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66672_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66672_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.21    09:25:38.79 +71:17:48.7   5363 2421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 09:25:38.68 +71:17:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66691_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66691_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.32    08:34:45.41 +67:38:06.1   8246 4372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.39    08:34:44.95 +67:38:06.4   8244 4374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66694_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66694_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.47    09:55:40.52 +72:12:11.0   3995 1768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 09:55:40.64 +72:12:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66721_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66721_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.37    08:51:47.32 +66:54:16.0   7328 4963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.29    08:51:47.38 +66:54:16.0   7325 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66722_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66722_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.42    09:12:59.53 +69:43:25.2   6008 3361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 09:12:59.70 +69:43:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66728_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66728_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.47    10:18:59.02 +72:24:05.3   2966 1450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:18:58.88 +72:24:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66764_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66764_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.74    10:15:39.86 +73:26:05.6   3251 0874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:15:39.90 +73:26:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66777_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66777_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.51    10:53:07.56 +66:34:58.8   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66786_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66786_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.48    08:53:15.97 +73:11:20.5   6794 1202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.50    08:53:17.56 +73:11:21.7   6791 1203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66800_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66800_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.65    10:48:42.22 +66:50:59.4   0481 4205   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:48:42.19 +66:50:59.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.604 1059744598597646976 162.17472547817 +66.85009538426 15.2204 14.8347 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.604#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66816_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66816_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.16    08:15:57.28 +68:42:55.7   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66825_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66825_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.67    10:47:36.61 +72:28:11.4   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66829_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66829_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.89    10:41:44.24 +69:30:36.4   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66832_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66832_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.46    10:37:43.70 +65:05:06.7   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66836_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66836_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.55    10:38:53.53 +69:02:19.2   1455 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66871_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66871_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.85    11:13:14.18 +70:49:14.1   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66894_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66894_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.87    11:18:53.21 +71:51:17.0   0228 0766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.93    11:18:53.28 +71:51:17.7   0226 0766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66904_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66904_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    15.09    10:49:22.74 +73:43:07.3   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66908_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66908_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.70    10:50:36.90 +70:12:39.4   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66925_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66925_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.74    09:53:18.94 +69:03:44.5   3862 3658   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.74    09:53:18.82 +69:03:47.8   3860 3658   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66938_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66938_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.61    10:20:30.43 +65:17:07.9   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66940_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66940_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.68    08:39:49.02 +72:27:54.5   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66969_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 66969_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.49    08:09:12.48 +70:34:21.2   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67011_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67011_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.67    08:34:57.43 +65:39:38.4   8468 5555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.92    08:34:57.46 +65:39:39.6   8465 5556   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67017_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67017_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.91    10:54:29.24 +72:44:15.2   1490 0759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.83    10:54:28.95 +72:44:17.6   1488 0760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67032_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67032_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.64    10:53:29.25 +67:27:43.4   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67040_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67040_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.65    11:05:45.85 +69:50:24.0   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67065_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67065_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.95    10:49:01.76 +65:51:50.3   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67066_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67066_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.81    10:14:24.04 +65:09:35.3   2233 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67082_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67082_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.97    11:21:29.20 +72:20:23.1   0257 0446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.97    11:21:29.03 +72:20:26.5   0256 0446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67105_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67105_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.89    09:39:17.54 +69:44:25.4   4641 3325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    15.00    09:39:17.31 +69:44:25.4   4639 3327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67111_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67111_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.80    08:43:13.44 +70:37:22.0   7475 2671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.79    08:43:13.87 +70:37:21.5   7473 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67115_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67115_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.93    09:16:02.26 +72:27:33.0   5812 1716   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.89    09:16:02.11 +72:27:32.6   5810 1718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67116_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67116_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.84    08:22:25.23 +68:43:46.8   8785 3575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    15.10    08:22:25.53 +68:43:47.6   8782 3577   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67120_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67120_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.85    09:21:12.72 +71:54:03.5   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67123_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67123_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.89    09:25:35.00 +71:31:54.2   5370 2278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.89    09:25:34.76 +71:31:55.8   5368 2279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67137_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67137_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.92    10:09:30.20 +71:36:24.3   3299 2013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.67    10:09:30.18 +71:36:24.2   3297 2014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67145_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67145_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.76    08:14:29.13 +67:31:43.3   9415 4167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.76    08:14:28.78 +67:31:40.7   9412 4169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67167_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67167_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.88    08:32:31.43 +72:11:24.1   7815 1645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    15.11    08:32:31.32 +72:11:23.7   7813 1646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67181_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67181_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.64    08:15:36.91 +68:58:17.4   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67201_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67201_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.91    08:35:39.05 +70:28:04.4   7869 2697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    15.03    08:35:39.52 +70:28:04.0   7866 2699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67213_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67213_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.89    08:36:01.33 +66:52:07.9   8262 4843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.88    08:36:01.27 +66:52:07.1   8260 4845   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67256_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67256_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.88    08:39:56.67 +65:59:27.2   8121 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67257_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 67257_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.23407    2461177.73407    14.95    08:34:19.54 +74:06:37.9   7507 0518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-36-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    14.92    08:34:19.00 +74:06:34.7   7506 0520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    10.94    08:04:00.23 +73:24:29.8   8869 0591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 08:04:00.21 +73:24:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    9.75    10:55:40.14 +71:52:07.7   1240 1229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:55:40.14 +71:52:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.23462    2461177.73462    9.15    10:44:37.69 +68:46:32.1   1105 3183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_010404_TTUQ1b1x1_2929578_7zinHusc/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-37-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits **** FOUND 10:44:37.69 +68:46:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 10:48:42.19 +66:50:59.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461177.73406939 -observatory V36 03:47:20.95 +20:33:51.5 Mercury (-2.1mag) 05:48:48.36 +24:56:57.3 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:46:27.03 +10:10:25.2 Mars (1.3mag) 07:31:18.18 +22:11:03.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:06.61 +02:07:23.9 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:54:53.50 +20:09:49.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:14:26.13 +00:06:50.6 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:09.95 -22:57:29.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 03:52:20.07 +24:33:44.0 Moon (-8.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 17 01:11 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461177.73406939: 07:31:14.83 +22:11:10.6 Io (5.9mag) 07:31:08.72 +22:11:29.5 Europa (6.1mag) 07:31:02.79 +22:11:40.5 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:31:38.03 +22:10:20.4 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:32:56.19 +21:48:31.0 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:31:15.51 +22:11:11.1 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:33:22.30 +22:13:25.3 Elara (17.4mag) 07:32:13.90 +22:34:37.0 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:38:44.86 +22:11:20.8 Carme (18.7mag) 00:42:10.70 +02:07:48.9 Titan (8.7mag) 00:42:02.84 +02:07:31.6 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:42:08.94 +02:06:01.6 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:42:01.36 +02:07:09.6 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:43:14.15 +02:12:23.9 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 17 01:11 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461177.73406939: 17:07:39.80 -31:08:11.7 JWST 19:21:29.85 +12:30:07.4 Chandra 18:38:03.13 -23:13:02.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 17 01:11 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461177.73406939 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 13:29:38.45 -27:57:00.0 14.6mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:22:01.36 +30:51:51.7 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:34:32.25 +00:51:43.3 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:13:51.27 +24:17:20.2 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 08:26:03.32 +22:01:56.4 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:54:17.33 -30:57:09.5 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:32:32.78 -68:28:55.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:41:16.52 +31:42:33.7 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:23:07.11 +13:49:57.4 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:49.52 +30:38:06.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:06:57.45 +26:43:51.9 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:15:41.39 +31:43:11.6 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:40:05.94 +02:37:20.4 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:41:25.11 +20:46:22.5 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:28:14.92 -11:06:24.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:49.72 -07:36:59.1 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:14:42.30 +65:01:16.3 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:35:43.81 -04:54:09.9 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 14:37:10.14 +87:26:01.9 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:43:05.07 +63:44:02.0 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:12:05.31 +25:17:36.5 12.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:55:23.17 +11:06:36.7 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:22:25.72 +24:24:55.3 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:56:04.73 -18:11:25.3 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:45:11.06 +38:30:00.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:59:27.45 +53:23:59.8 16.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:01:42.23 -09:12:58.9 11.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:42:49.60 +04:25:49.1 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:17:38.00 +41:31:53.4 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:12:14.03 -13:24:39.8 16.1mag A/2026 E1 19:42:54.13 -08:14:00.4 10.0mag 10P/Tempel 14:24:05.73 -01:07:46.7 16.8mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:03.32 -00:53:20.1 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:45:55.74 -02:37:23.6 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:37:26.92 +22:31:00.4 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:13:19.01 +29:42:22.7 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:05:42.74 -08:06:06.3 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:33:36.79 +29:59:44.2 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:16:49.13 +13:57:53.5 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:29:17.50 -00:28:23.4 15.1mag 88P/Howell 03:44:19.08 +27:35:26.5 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:59:39.01 +33:19:18.1 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:13:14.13 +24:12:29.0 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:22:57.80 +17:31:48.8 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:49:38.50 +17:41:12.5 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 04:13:47.47 +19:34:29.4 12.0mag 141P/Machholz 04:17:14.15 +14:44:19.3 11.9mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:58:47.26 +11:19:30.9 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:41:26.77 -28:09:55.0 17.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:32:27.92 +14:03:32.3 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:30:47.54 -03:42:24.5 18.0mag 169P/NEAT 17:08:47.06 -10:12:48.0 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 06:44:32.89 +35:55:05.2 17.2mag 240P/NEAT 23:35:38.34 -11:08:17.8 17.0mag 260P/McNaught 03:07:46.17 +27:58:34.0 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR 15:26:42.76 +08:19:27.4 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:50:58.69 +21:11:14.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:24:16.00 +43:09:51.8 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 17 01:11 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 17 01:11 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 17 01:11 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 10:43:26.630 +04:29:53.93 AT 2026mcy 2026-05-09.59 22.29 10:35:23.050 +03:30:09.64 AT 2026mcx 2026-05-09.59 21.95 14:26:45.040 +02:22:25.68 AT 2026mcw 2026-05-08.66 22.41 14:35:06.100 -00:36:55.65 AT 2026mcv 2026-05-08.66 22.3 14:35:20.810 -01:41:37.33 AT 2026mcu 2026-05-08.66 22.34 14:16:22.830 +02:00:21.77 AT 2026mct 2026-05-08.66 22.29 14:00:32.370 +01:29:57.77 AT 2026mcs 2026-05-08.66 22.02 13:30:42.870 +01:59:54.57 AT 2026mcr 2026-05-08.65 22.25 13:19:58.590 +00:57:10.80 AT 2026mcq 2026-05-08.65 22.38 14:15:15.410 +00:48:22.83 AT 2026mcp 2026-05-07.73 21.81 14:12:46.490 +00:23:13.18 AT 2026mco 2026-05-07.73 21.65 13:34:43.970 -01:25:52.23 AT 2026mcn 2026-05-07.63 21.59 13:01:26.980 -00:54:29.14 AT 2026mcm 2026-05-03.63 21.92 10:22:40.970 +03:53:10.87 AT 2026mcl 2026-05-03.60 22.3 11:20:27.710 -01:55:36.29 AT 2026mck 2026-05-03.60 21.85 11:18:24.980 -01:59:50.81 AT 2026mcj 2026-05-03.60 21.98 11:05:13.920 -00:28:49.93 AT 2026mci 2026-05-03.59 21.84 10:43:17.140 +04:09:18.06 AT 2026mch 2026-05-03.59 21.97 13:59:38.170 +00:14:00.67 AT 2026mcg 2026-04-12.73 22.18 13:22:56.780 -01:33:23.87 AT 2026mcf 2026-04-12.71 22.19 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 17 01:11 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 93 C