This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.2103 2461177.7103 11.49 12:33:50.74 -01:43:58.0
293.88399 60.82954 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.26 Proserpina -0 0 0 11.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:33:50.74 -01:43:58.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:33:50.74 -01:43:58.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.2103* 12 33 50.74 -01 43 58.0 11.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.7103,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.2103 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.2103 2461177.7103 11.74 13:07:54.60 -01:50:57.1
311.37923 60.75210 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.69 Hesperia 0 -0 0 11.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:07:54.60 -01:50:57.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:07:54.60 -01:50:57.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.2103* 13 07 54.60 -01 50 57.1 11.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.7103,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.2103 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.2103 2461177.7103 13.05 13:07:37.50 -06:11:22.2
310.22570 56.45284 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.178 Belisana 0 -0 0 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:07:37.50 -06:11:22.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:07:37.50 -06:11:22.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.2103* 13 07 37.50 -06 11 22.2 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.7103,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.2103 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.2103 2461177.7103 14.85 12:28:07.53 -01:51:46.3
291.04895 60.46991 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.321 Florentina -1 1 1 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:28:07.53 -01:51:46.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:28:07.53 -01:51:46.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.2103* 12 28 07.53 -01 51 46.3 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.7103,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.2103 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.76376755 16.04.2026 06:19:39.516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
First image: 2461146.76376755 16.04.2026 06:19:39.516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Last image: 2461177.71048428 17.05.2026 05:02:55.842 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5717
Objects passed selection criteria: 5716
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5538.5
Average stars matched: 5449.75 (98.3976 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111716 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 00:23:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.76376755 16.04.2026 06:19:39.516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
First image: 2461146.76376755 16.04.2026 06:19:39.516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Last image: 2461177.71048428 17.05.2026 05:02:55.842 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 82
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33169
Objects passed selection criteria: 33084
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32182.2
Average stars matched: 30927.8 (96.1019 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134360 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 00:25:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.71006317
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:30.893 -01:59:12.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:25.105 -02:01:00.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:30.893 -01:59:12.21
Second-epoch image center 12:51:25.105 -02:01:00.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0386 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:24.179 -02:00:55.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:30.893 -01:59:12.21
Second-epoch image center 12:51:24.179 -02:00:55.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0401 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:25.105 -02:01:00.64
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:24.179 -02:00:55.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00409 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5wVu36RcCp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cuyF9BMnO8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2UxR5iJodP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9CrcBGYEFk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits and wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits and wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits and wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.6882 to 201.0379 deg, Dec -7.7042 to +3.7577 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.6882 to 201.0379 deg, Dec -7.7042 to 3.7577 deg
Loaded 4329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3216 out of 3338 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3338 out of 5968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.839350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.839350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.6882 to 201.0379 deg, Dec -7.7042 to +3.7577 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.6882 to 201.0379 deg, Dec -7.7042 to 3.7577 deg
Loaded 4329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3216 out of 3338 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3338 out of 5968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 5826 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.6881 to 201.0617 deg, Dec -7.7019 to +3.7850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.6881 to 201.0617 deg, Dec -7.7019 to 3.7850 deg
Loaded 4340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3332 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3332 out of 5826 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
2.2 pix Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5wVu36RcCp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5968
Got 5968 stars (including 5569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5968 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 986 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 986 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 986 stars left (next iteration limit 1084)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits N_match=986 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=239 n_q2=219 n_q3=269 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -region wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cuyF9BMnO8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=411, passed=5826
Got 5826 stars (including 5405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5826 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 985 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 985 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 985 stars left (next iteration limit 1083)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits N_match=985 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=232 n_q2=224 n_q3=267 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -region wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2UxR5iJodP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=5351
Got 5351 stars (including 5000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 985 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 985 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 985 stars left (next iteration limit 1083)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits N_match=985 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=234 n_q2=225 n_q3=266 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9CrcBGYEFk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, passed=5277
Got 5277 stars (including 4912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 985 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 985 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 985 stars left (next iteration limit 1083)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits N_match=985 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=234 n_q2=225 n_q3=267 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.218
ref2=Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.252
new1=fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.137
new2=fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.184
reference average sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.235
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194_astrometric_residuals.png (986 matched stars from wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195_astrometric_residuals.png (985 matched stars from wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152_astrometric_residuals.png (985 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (985 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:33:50.74 -01:43:58.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:07:54.60 -01:50:57.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:33:50.74 -01:43:58.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:07:54.60 -01:50:57.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20265.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20266.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20259_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 20259_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:01.86 -03:32:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20265_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 20265_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20266_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 20266_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
12:33:50.74 -01:43:58.0
13:07:54.60 -01:50:57.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:30.893 -01:59:12.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:25.105 -02:01:00.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:30.893 -01:59:12.21
Second-epoch image center 12:51:25.105 -02:01:00.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0386 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:24.179 -02:00:55.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:30.893 -01:59:12.21
Second-epoch image center 12:51:24.179 -02:00:55.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0401 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:25.105 -02:01:00.64
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:24.179 -02:00:55.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00409 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TGpP13gFBf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Das72LCJsA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DXrFDaFHZQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.30BNeN4yQT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits and wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits and wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits and wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.6441 to 201.0788 deg, Dec -7.7188 to +3.7852 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.6441 to 201.0788 deg, Dec -7.7188 to 3.7852 deg
Loaded 4366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3156 out of 3397 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3397 out of 32935 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.731050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.731050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.6441 to 201.0788 deg, Dec -7.7188 to +3.7852 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.6441 to 201.0788 deg, Dec -7.7188 to 3.7852 deg
Loaded 4366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3156 out of 3397 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3397 out of 32935 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 33833 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.6486 to 201.0701 deg, Dec -7.7306 to +3.7850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.6486 to 201.0701 deg, Dec -7.7306 to 3.7850 deg
Loaded 4372 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3400 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 33833 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
2.1 pix Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TGpP13gFBf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1263, passed=32920
Got 32920 stars (including 31601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32920 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 986 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 986 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 986 stars left (next iteration limit 1084)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits N_match=986 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=229 n_q2=223 n_q3=270 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -region wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Das72LCJsA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1389, passed=33814
Got 33814 stars (including 32372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33814 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 986 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 986 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 986 stars left (next iteration limit 1084)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits N_match=986 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=228 n_q2=224 n_q3=263 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -region wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DXrFDaFHZQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1128, passed=31413
Got 31413 stars (including 30225 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31413 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 985 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 985 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 985 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 985 stars left (next iteration limit 1083)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits N_match=985 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=241 n_q2=226 n_q3=263 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.30BNeN4yQT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1169, passed=31629
Got 31629 stars (including 30406 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 986 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 986 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 986 stars left (next iteration limit 1084)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits N_match=986 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=236 n_q2=227 n_q3=268 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_002002_TTUQ1b1x1_3009147_PtH7E5ZH/wcs_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:06:08.63 -04:36:41.8: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:07:37.50 -06:11:22.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:06:08.63 -04:36:41.8: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:59:59.64 -04:07:43.3: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:50:37.91 +00:29:21.0: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:06:08.63 -04:36:41.8: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4485 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:38:17.60 +03:13:59.2: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:26:44.30 -05:09:13.6: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:07:37.50 -06:11:22.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:20:27.81 -02:08:08.0: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:56:10.59 -03:22:59.0: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:58:46.59 -03:31:16.2: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:50:37.91 +00:29:21.0: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:59:59.64 -04:07:43.3: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:38:17.60 +03:13:59.2: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:50:37.91 +00:29:21.0: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6344 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:59:59.64 -04:07:43.3: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6332 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:26:44.30 -05:09:13.6: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:38:17.60 +03:13:59.2: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7047 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:44.30 -05:09:13.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6039 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:20:27.81 -02:08:08.0: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:27.81 -02:08:08.0: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9533 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:56:10.59 -03:22:59.0: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:56:10.59 -03:22:59.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8725 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:58:46.59 -03:31:16.2: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:58:46.59 -03:31:16.2: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1471 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:00:37.38 -02:35:27.4: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:12:58.74 -05:49:33.0: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:19:44.90 +01:02:02.1: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:17:23.96 -02:50:46.4: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:13:06.54 -00:57:26.0: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:00:37.38 -02:35:27.4: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:00:37.38 -02:35:27.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2448 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:18:44.25 -03:17:54.7: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:15:32.49 -01:32:52.2: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:06:55.17 -04:00:52.9: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:12:58.74 -05:49:33.0: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:15:26.73 -00:00:32.9: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:58.74 -05:49:33.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4969 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:19:44.90 +01:02:02.1: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:17:23.96 -02:50:46.4: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:19:44.90 +01:02:02.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6824 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:23.96 -02:50:46.4: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5475 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:13:06.54 -00:57:26.0: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:06.54 -00:57:26.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5989 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:18:44.25 -03:17:54.7: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:18:44.25 -03:17:54.7: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6240 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:15:32.49 -01:32:52.2: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:32.49 -01:32:52.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6399 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:06:55.17 -04:00:52.9: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:15:26.73 -00:00:32.9: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:06:55.17 -04:00:52.9: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6748 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:26.73 -00:00:32.9: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7485 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:33:29.55 -04:55:33.8: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:17:49.61 -04:38:36.0: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:17:58.48 -05:14:26.8: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:16:03.24 +00:12:33.1: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:21:21.51 +00:12:42.5: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:33:29.55 -04:55:33.8: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:33:29.55 -04:55:33.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6468 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:17:17.72 -00:48:56.3: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:13:01.06 +01:08:21.9: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:11:28.85 +01:24:19.8: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:14:56.38 -04:24:14.1: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:17:49.61 -04:38:36.0: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:49.61 -04:38:36.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6104 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:16:03.24 +00:12:33.1: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:17:58.48 -05:14:26.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:03.24 +00:12:33.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7701 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:21:21.51 +00:12:42.5: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:21.51 +00:12:42.5: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8427 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:17:17.72 -00:48:56.3: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:13:01.06 +01:08:21.9: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:17.72 -00:48:56.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6713 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:01.06 +01:08:21.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8675 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:11:28.85 +01:24:19.8: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:14:56.38 -04:24:14.1: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:11:28.85 +01:24:19.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8427 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:56.38 -04:24:14.1: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7710 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:12:12.16 +00:40:51.0: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:17:54.62 +01:29:24.3: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:19:33.04 +00:35:21.7: 15.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:15:40.14 -01:15:51.1: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:12:12.16 +00:40:51.0: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:12.16 +00:40:51.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8784 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:08:33.39 -00:40:27.1: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:13:23.68 -00:22:35.1: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:05:39.59 +01:28:44.4: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:42:21.33 -06:39:13.8: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:17:54.62 +01:29:24.3: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:19:33.04 +00:35:21.7: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:15:40.14 -01:15:51.1: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:54.62 +01:29:24.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8938 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:19:33.04 +00:35:21.7: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7637 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:40.14 -01:15:51.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8601 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:13:23.68 -00:22:35.1: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:08:33.39 -00:40:27.1: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:23.68 -00:22:35.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9183 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:08:33.39 -00:40:27.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8638 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:42:21.33 -06:39:13.8: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:05:39.59 +01:28:44.4: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:42:21.33 -06:39:13.8: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7547 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:05:39.59 +01:28:44.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8655 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:15:20.06 -03:50:48.5: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:09:39.25 -03:35:12.5: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:20:46.71 -01:47:58.6: 15.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:05:54.67 -07:03:15.5: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:28:07.53 -01:51:46.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 12:32:57.86 +01:01:03.7: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-19-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits at 13:13:13.54 -02:40:34.9: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:15:20.06 -03:50:48.5: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:20.06 -03:50:48.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7778 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:05:54.67 -07:03:15.5: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:20:46.71 -01:47:58.6: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:09:39.25 -03:35:12.5: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:46.71 -01:47:58.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7783 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:05:54.67 -07:03:15.5: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7328 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:09:39.25 -03:35:12.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8706 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:28:07.53 -01:51:46.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 12:32:57.86 +01:01:03.7: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-20-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits at 13:13:13.54 -02:40:34.9: 15.24 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:57.86 +01:01:03.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9324 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:13.54 -02:40:34.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8473 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53404.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53482.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53166_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53166_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:56.87 -06:07:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53167_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53167_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53171_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53171_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:01.87 -03:32:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53177_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53177_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:33:50.74 -01:43:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53178_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53179_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53179_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:07:54.60 -01:50:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53181_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53181_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53183_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53183_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53194_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:16:31.48 +01:26:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53201_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53201_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53204_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53204_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53208_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53208_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53210_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53214_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53214_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53218_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53218_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53228_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53228_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53231_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 53231_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53242_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53257_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53258_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53258_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53259_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53259_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53260_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53260_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53264_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53264_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53265_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53265_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53268_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53268_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53275_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53275_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53276_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53276_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:06:45.36 +01:22:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53293_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53295_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53311_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53315_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53315_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53321_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53321_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:29.55 +02:50:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53325_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53325_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53326_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53326_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53334_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53334_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53354_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53354_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53362_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53363_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53363_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53366_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53366_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53369_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53369_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53372_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53372_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53387_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53391_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53391_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53394_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53394_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53396_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53396_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53402_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53402_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53404_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53404_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:17:58.48 -05:14:26.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.660 3634926759290069248 199.49408596890 -05.24058239446 15.2568 14.8110 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.660#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53406_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53406_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53411_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53411_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53412_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53412_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53413_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53421_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53421_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53425_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53425_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53429_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53429_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53433_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53433_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53436_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53436_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53437_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53437_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53442_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53442_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53446_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53446_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53447_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53448_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53448_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53457_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53464_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53470_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53470_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53475_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53475_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53482_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 53482_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53483_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53483_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53490_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53490_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51255_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 51255_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16812_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 16812_fd_Vir-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-02-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks