This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1968 2461177.6968 12.57 13:22:22.44 -09:41:09.0
315.49785 52.42950 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.374 Burgundia 1 -0 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:22:22.44 -09:41:09.0: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:22:22.44 -09:41:09.0: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1968* 13 22 22.44 -09 41 09.0 12.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6968,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1968 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1968 2461177.6968 12.69 12:49:44.73 -08:23:07.6
302.21137 54.48394 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.55 Pandora 1 0 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:49:44.73 -08:23:07.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:49:44.73 -08:23:07.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1968* 12 49 44.73 -08 23 07.6 12.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6968,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1968 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1968 2461177.6968 12.98 12:31:22.98 -10:38:24.5
294.92680 51.91962 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.241 Germania 0 -0 0 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:31:22.98 -10:38:24.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:31:22.98 -10:38:24.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1968* 12 31 22.98 -10 38 24.5 13.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6968,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1968 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1968 2461177.6968 13.13 13:07:37.90 -06:11:22.9
310.22864 56.45246 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.178 Belisana 1 0 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:07:37.90 -06:11:22.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:07:37.90 -06:11:22.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1968* 13 07 37.90 -06 11 22.9 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6968,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1968 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1968 2461177.6968 13.15 12:59:55.10 -08:51:43.5
306.49309 53.95102 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.233 Asterope 1 0 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:59:55.10 -08:51:43.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:59:55.10 -08:51:43.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1968* 12 59 55.10 -08 51 43.5 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6968,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1968 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1968 2461177.6968 13.78 12:24:11.95 -08:39:35.3
291.53691 53.60821 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda -0 0 0 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:24:11.95 -08:39:35.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:24:11.95 -08:39:35.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1968* 12 24 11.95 -08 39 35.3 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6968,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1968 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.91602938 11.02.2026 09:58:54.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
First image: 2461082.91602938 11.02.2026 09:58:54.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Last image: 2461177.69702326 17.05.2026 04:43:32.810 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5541
Objects passed selection criteria: 5536
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5292.25
Average stars matched: 5166.25 (97.6192 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 23:54:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.91602938 11.02.2026 09:58:54.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
First image: 2461082.91602938 11.02.2026 09:58:54.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Last image: 2461177.69702326 17.05.2026 04:43:32.810 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 110
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35217
Objects passed selection criteria: 35120
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33543.8
Average stars matched: 32503.2 (96.8981 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 23:55:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.69654291
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits'
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:17.659 -09:58:37.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:23.948 -10:01:31.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:17.659 -09:58:37.31
Second-epoch image center 12:51:23.948 -10:01:31.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0548 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:21.805 -10:01:02.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:17.659 -09:58:37.31
Second-epoch image center 12:51:21.805 -10:01:02.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0438 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:23.948 -10:01:31.27
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:21.805 -10:01:02.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01186 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qGFgVlIwZ6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F3gyWFW9AG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QM8n9oYCcD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l9Adq9VQYF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.7361 to 200.9220 deg, Dec -15.2510 to -4.6700 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.7361 to 200.9220 deg, Dec -15.2510 to -4.6700 deg
Loaded 4165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3283 out of 3467 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3467 out of 5760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.873200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.873200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.7361 to 200.9220 deg, Dec -15.2510 to -4.6700 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.7361 to 200.9220 deg, Dec -15.2510 to -4.6700 deg
Loaded 4165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3283 out of 3467 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3467 out of 5760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5181 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8992 to 201.0615 deg, Dec -15.3017 to -4.6477 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8992 to 201.0615 deg, Dec -15.3017 to -4.6477 deg
Loaded 4171 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3241 out of 3339 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3339 out of 5181 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
2.3 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
14.8 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qGFgVlIwZ6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, passed=5760
Got 5760 stars (including 5278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=213 n_q2=271 n_q3=248 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F3gyWFW9AG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=384, passed=5181
Got 5181 stars (including 4792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.564 n_q1=230 n_q2=264 n_q3=239 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QM8n9oYCcD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=370, passed=5198
Got 5198 stars (including 4820 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5198 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=229 n_q2=248 n_q3=266 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l9Adq9VQYF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=383, passed=5205
Got 5205 stars (including 4816 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5205 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=229 n_q2=247 n_q3=264 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.198
ref2=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits sigma_overall=0.485 worst_q_ratio=1.163
new1=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.136
new2=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.210
reference average sigma_overall=0.432 worst_q_ratio=1.1805
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:45:43.75 -05:39:00.6: 10.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:50:00.02 -10:05:52.9: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:45:43.75 -05:39:00.6: 10.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:50:00.02 -10:05:52.9: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:45:43.75 -05:39:00.6: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0827 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:50:00.02 -10:05:52.9: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9580 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20269_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20269_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20339_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20351_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:53:56.64 -10:47:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20353_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:39:34.18 -10:09:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:17.659 -09:58:37.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:23.948 -10:01:31.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:17.659 -09:58:37.31
Second-epoch image center 12:51:23.948 -10:01:31.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0548 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:21.805 -10:01:02.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:17.659 -09:58:37.31
Second-epoch image center 12:51:21.805 -10:01:02.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0438 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:23.948 -10:01:31.27
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:21.805 -10:01:02.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01186 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iyBTjO0IeO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O4PBFvt2Ib
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y9KBcUYc1Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TmBg0ljq6d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36963 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.7062 to 200.9373 deg, Dec -15.2672 to -4.6582 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.7062 to 200.9373 deg, Dec -15.2672 to -4.6582 deg
Loaded 4180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3305 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 36963 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.748500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.748500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 36963 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.7062 to 200.9373 deg, Dec -15.2672 to -4.6582 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.7062 to 200.9373 deg, Dec -15.2672 to -4.6582 deg
Loaded 4180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3305 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 36963 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 31865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8992 to 201.0664 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.6060 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8992 to 201.0664 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.6060 deg
Loaded 4196 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3339 out of 3563 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3563 out of 31865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
2.1 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iyBTjO0IeO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1503, passed=36949
Got 36949 stars (including 35371 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36949 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=217 n_q2=270 n_q3=251 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O4PBFvt2Ib (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1223, passed=31848
Got 31848 stars (including 30578 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=216 n_q2=273 n_q3=236 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y9KBcUYc1Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1218, passed=33168
Got 33168 stars (including 31885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33168 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=226 n_q2=250 n_q3=269 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TmBg0ljq6d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1210, passed=33317
Got 33317 stars (including 32042 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33317 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=219 n_q2=260 n_q3=268 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-42-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235202_TTUQ1b1x1_2175695_JDWmBg4c/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:22:22.44 -09:41:09.0: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:56:51.55 -05:02:13.9: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:55:12.44 -08:37:43.3: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:22:12.95 -07:23:58.3: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:07:37.90 -06:11:22.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:31:22.98 -10:38:24.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:49:44.73 -08:23:07.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:59:55.10 -08:51:43.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:22:12.95 -07:23:58.3: 14.84 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:22:22.44 -09:41:09.0: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:55:12.44 -08:37:43.3: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:12.95 -07:23:58.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6083 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.79 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:55:12.44 -08:37:43.3: ref_mag=10.79 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1305 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:56:51.55 -05:02:13.9: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:56:51.55 -05:02:13.9: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7062 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:10:17.72 -08:36:42.9: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:24:11.95 -08:39:35.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:07:37.90 -06:11:22.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:31:22.98 -10:38:24.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:49:44.73 -08:23:07.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:59:55.10 -08:51:43.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:10:17.72 -08:36:42.9: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:24:11.95 -08:39:35.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:17.72 -08:36:42.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9473 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:14:33.41 -06:46:02.7: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:44:26.50 -09:07:02.0: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:24:10.13 -12:11:08.4: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:52:02.68 -08:59:52.8: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:14:33.41 -06:46:02.7: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:24:10.13 -12:11:08.4: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:44:26.50 -09:07:02.0: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:33.41 -06:46:02.7: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3452 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:44:26.50 -09:07:02.0: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3142 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:10.13 -12:11:08.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2671 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:52:02.68 -08:59:52.8: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:52:02.68 -08:59:52.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2744 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:13:27.17 -11:09:40.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:17:04.71 -13:34:28.7: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:57:46.91 -09:38:00.8: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:13:27.17 -11:09:40.2: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:17:04.71 -13:34:28.7: 14.88 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:27.17 -11:09:40.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4321 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:04.71 -13:34:28.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4839 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:00:48.76 -12:00:23.9: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:57:46.91 -09:38:00.8: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:57:46.91 -09:38:00.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4305 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:00:48.76 -12:00:23.9: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:00:48.76 -12:00:23.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4797 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:21:59.36 -08:49:05.7: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:15:35.35 -07:52:29.4: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:11:15.18 -05:40:31.6: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:15:35.35 -07:52:29.4: 15.19 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:35.35 -07:52:29.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6042 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:21:59.36 -08:49:05.7: 14.70 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:59.36 -08:49:05.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5784 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:16:45.45 -07:21:36.3: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:11:15.18 -05:40:31.6: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:11:15.18 -05:40:31.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5884 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:16:45.45 -07:21:36.3: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:45.45 -07:21:36.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6368 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:21:15.00 -08:37:11.5: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:04:42.26 -13:04:09.2: 15.46 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:04:42.26 -13:04:09.2: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:21:15.00 -08:37:11.5: 14.90 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:04:42.26 -13:04:09.2: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5588 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:15.00 -08:37:11.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5372 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:16:30.71 -13:46:24.1: 15.17 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:10:09.91 -10:42:22.6: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:16:30.71 -13:46:24.1: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:30.71 -13:46:24.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6351 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:10:09.91 -10:42:22.6: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:09.91 -10:42:22.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6239 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:20:01.49 -08:59:45.4: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:20:01.49 -08:59:45.4: 15.25 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:13:54.90 -10:09:36.7: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:01.49 -08:59:45.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6262 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:22:16.74 -09:18:46.1: 15.26 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:01:01.37 -11:45:20.1: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:13:54.90 -10:09:36.7: 15.28 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:54.90 -10:09:36.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6180 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:22:16.74 -09:18:46.1: 14.91 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:16.74 -09:18:46.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7261 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:01:01.37 -11:45:20.1: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:03:31.18 -09:58:02.0: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:01:01.37 -11:45:20.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5687 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:03:31.18 -09:58:02.0: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:01:34.33 -11:51:19.0: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:03:31.18 -09:58:02.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6556 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:17:22.82 -06:13:46.8: 15.16 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:18:50.06 -08:04:12.1: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:01:34.33 -11:51:19.0: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:01:34.33 -11:51:19.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4798 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:17:22.82 -06:13:46.8: 15.07 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:22.82 -06:13:46.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7560 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:18:50.06 -08:04:12.1: 14.82 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:18:50.06 -08:04:12.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5944 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:06:54.93 -08:02:22.1: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:06:54.93 -08:02:22.1: 14.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:06:54.93 -08:02:22.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5462 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:19:35.90 -09:08:04.5: 15.22 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:02:08.24 -12:37:23.6: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:19:35.90 -09:08:04.5: 15.19 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:19:35.90 -09:08:04.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.6308 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:02:08.24 -12:37:23.6: 14.84 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:02:08.24 -12:37:23.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6043 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:18:19.95 -15:06:54.9: 14.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:18:19.95 -15:06:54.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:18:19.95 -15:06:54.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:21:55.75 -06:35:21.7: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:21:55.75 -06:35:21.7: 14.56 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:55.75 -06:35:21.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6231 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:16:15.45 -08:18:58.0: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:11:30.71 -10:19:54.9: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:11:30.71 -10:19:54.9: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:16:15.45 -08:18:58.0: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:13:59.05 -09:42:12.0: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:11:30.71 -10:19:54.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6146 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:15.45 -08:18:58.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7555 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:55:36.76 -08:03:02.1: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:22:37.09 -09:21:56.9: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:14:36.53 -11:09:47.7: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:04:13.62 -13:40:34.0: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:13:59.05 -09:42:12.0: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:59.05 -09:42:12.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7052 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:55:36.76 -08:03:02.1: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:55:36.76 -08:03:02.1: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7178 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:22:37.09 -09:21:56.9: 15.25 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:37.09 -09:21:56.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5591 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:14:36.53 -11:09:47.7: 15.21 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:14:04.40 -05:21:55.7: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:36.53 -11:09:47.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6853 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:17:44.49 -10:17:29.1: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:04:13.62 -13:40:34.0: 15.27 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:04:13.62 -13:40:34.0: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7094 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:02:59.33 -05:18:51.9: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:53:21.72 -05:29:54.5: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:14:04.40 -05:21:55.7: 15.02 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:17:44.49 -10:17:29.1: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:04.40 -05:21:55.7: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7825 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:44.49 -10:17:29.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6306 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:10:47.49 -05:14:18.3: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:11:32.91 -06:42:26.8: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:15:18.41 -07:36:14.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:18:13.82 -05:32:54.5: 15.51 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:02:59.33 -05:18:51.9: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:02:59.33 -05:18:51.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6634 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:13:39.18 -07:25:26.8: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:53:21.72 -05:29:54.5: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:09:08.15 -05:38:24.5: 15.23 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:53:21.72 -05:29:54.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8070 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:10:47.49 -05:14:18.3: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:47.49 -05:14:18.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7742 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:11:32.91 -06:42:26.8: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:15:18.41 -07:36:14.2: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:11:32.91 -06:42:26.8: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6679 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:18.41 -07:36:14.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7345 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:18:13.82 -05:32:54.5: 15.00 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:18:13.82 -05:32:54.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.6467 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:13:39.18 -07:25:26.8: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:00:37.22 -13:14:22.6: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:39.18 -07:25:26.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7607 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:09:08.15 -05:38:24.5: 15.36 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:09:08.15 -05:38:24.5: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7317 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:13:12.68 -13:45:04.5: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:11:56.90 -05:36:38.6: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:00:37.22 -13:14:22.6: 15.01 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:00:37.22 -13:14:22.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7749 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:13:51.86 -07:07:13.5: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:08:41.42 -07:13:20.0: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:59:20.67 -10:55:35.5: 15.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:46:12.91 -05:30:35.1: 15.57 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:16:49.30 -07:49:38.6: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:09:05.35 -13:39:56.3: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:13:12.68 -13:45:04.5: 14.91 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:12.68 -13:45:04.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6411 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:16:39.58 -10:09:02.3: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:11:56.90 -05:36:38.6: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:11:56.90 -05:36:38.6: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7950 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:13:51.86 -07:07:13.5: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:51.86 -07:07:13.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7665 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:08:41.42 -07:13:20.0: 15.16 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:46:12.91 -05:30:35.1: 15.55 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:59:20.67 -10:55:35.5: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:08:41.42 -07:13:20.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8533 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:46:12.91 -05:30:35.1: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.8521 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:59:20.67 -10:55:35.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7757 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:09:05.35 -13:39:56.3: 14.88 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:16:49.30 -07:49:38.6: 15.25 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:09:05.35 -13:39:56.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6494 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:49.30 -07:49:38.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8296 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:16:39.58 -10:09:02.3: 14.99 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:31:16.58 -10:10:28.3: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:39.58 -10:09:02.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6772 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:07:59.25 -10:01:23.5: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:06:57.27 -12:39:14.2: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:29:54.65 -06:56:14.5: 15.52 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:31:16.58 -10:10:28.3: 15.20 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:16.58 -10:10:28.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7943 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 13:14:05.61 -09:09:27.1: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:32:48.75 -11:06:59.1: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:07:59.25 -10:01:23.5: 15.23 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-58-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits at 12:29:04.10 -09:57:45.6: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:59.25 -10:01:23.5: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8343 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:06:57.27 -12:39:14.2: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:06:57.27 -12:39:14.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6927 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:29:54.65 -06:56:14.5: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:54.65 -06:56:14.5: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8399 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 13:14:05.61 -09:09:27.1: 15.47 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:05.61 -09:09:27.1: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9338 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:32:48.75 -11:06:59.1: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:48.75 -11:06:59.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4084 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0522.fits at 12:29:04.10 -09:57:45.6: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:04.10 -09:57:45.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7697 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51637.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51658.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51723.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51746.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51754.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51381_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51381_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51383_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51383_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:14:49.88 -12:18:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51384_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51384_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51386_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51386_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:45:54.04 -08:34:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51396_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51396_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:21:49.00 -10:07:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51399_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51399_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:12:53.31 -11:38:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51400_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51400_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51561_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51561_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:18:20.24 -05:47:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51582_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51582_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:09:50.13 -05:33:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51637_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 51637_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51658_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 51658_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51723_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 51723_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51746_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 51746_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51754_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 51754_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51812_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51812_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:13:03.23 -12:17:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51952_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51952_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:22:54.65 -06:26:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51982_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 51982_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51989_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51989_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52027_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52027_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:06:40.68 -05:38:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52085_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52085_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:17:29.97 -07:44:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52116_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52116_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:17:49.10 -13:59:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52130_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52130_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52156_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52156_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52171_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52171_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52173_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52173_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52180_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52180_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52213_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52213_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:22:50.27 -05:48:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52243_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52243_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52250_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52253_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52268_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52268_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52290_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52300_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52304_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52304_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52306_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52306_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52307_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52319_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52319_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:19:38.50 -09:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52321_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52321_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52322_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52322_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52326_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52326_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:21:50.43 -09:19:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52335_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52335_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52341_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52341_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:07:41.80 -10:44:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52343_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52343_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52352_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52352_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52353_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52359_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52361_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52366_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52366_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52372_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52373_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52373_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52375_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52375_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52377_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52378_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52378_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:04:28.29 -06:08:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52380_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52380_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52382_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52384_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52386_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52391_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52391_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:18:41.05 -06:16:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52396_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52402_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52410_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52411_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52413_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52415_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:28.90 -05:15:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52418_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52427_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52427_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52430_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:35:54.78 -12:05:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52431_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52431_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52440_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52440_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52441_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52444_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52444_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:40.51 -06:59:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52449_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52449_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52451_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52456_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52459_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52464_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52472_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52479_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:20:46.96 -05:46:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52486_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:21:37.15 -05:50:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52487_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52487_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52489_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52489_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52493_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52493_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52499_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52499_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52500_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52500_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52508_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52514_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52515_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52517_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52521_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52521_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52524_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52525_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52530_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52534_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52534_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52538_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:47:38.04 -05:52:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52558_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52575_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 52586_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
