NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields LMi-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
LMi-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing LMi-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 515368 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 515368 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits_preview.png'
LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits

renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits_preview.png'
LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 446.3853 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 557.4480 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1006.5337 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 506.2526 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1007.3304 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 506.6019 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.25485 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-16T23:25:57.4074816' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-17T04:25:57.4074816' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61177.1846922105 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-17T04:26:07.3113332' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61177.1848068405 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 147.272378009529 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 38.0002081897291 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.3038888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 291.108611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.3381892661886 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 48.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 891.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 43.903512 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 34.602768 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits :) Spent 0.502484 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-16T23:26:31.5945043' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-17T04:26:31.5945043' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61177.1850878936 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-17T04:26:41.4980841' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61177.1852025231 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 147.272378027001 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 38.0002081931721 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.1936111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 291.139722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.34048278032426 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 48.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 891.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 43.903512 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 34.602768 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits :) Spent 0.512902 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits


fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.68480795 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits' wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:17.032 +37:58:27.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 Second-epoch image center 09:49:17.032 +37:58:27.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0462 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:17.467 +37:58:26.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 Second-epoch image center 09:49:17.467 +37:58:26.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0475 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:49:17.032 +37:58:27.19 Second-epoch second image center 09:49:17.467 +37:58:26.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00144 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00144 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KAd4CCsf7L Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pBOJ2BzIxO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LP2YWkD4ry Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nQkzEEX1QB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat) found 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec +32.0100 to +43.3731 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec 32.0100 to 43.3731 deg Loaded 5376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3731 out of 3967 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3967 out of 7740 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.916600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.916600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec +32.0100 to +43.3731 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec 32.0100 to 43.3731 deg Loaded 5376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3731 out of 3967 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3967 out of 7740 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7724 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3436 to 157.6108 deg, Dec +32.0331 to +43.3964 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3436 to 157.6108 deg, Dec 32.0331 to 43.3964 deg Loaded 5377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3728 out of 3970 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3970 out of 7724 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.2 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 3.9 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 3.8 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits 2.2 pix wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.2 pix wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 15.5 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 14.8 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 14.8 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.KAd4CCsf7L (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, passed=7740 Got 7740 stars (including 7160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7632 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7630 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7630 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=235 n_q2=215 n_q3=244 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.pBOJ2BzIxO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=572, passed=7724 Got 7724 stars (including 7147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=230 n_q2=211 n_q3=252 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LP2YWkD4ry (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, passed=6828 Got 6828 stars (including 6581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6828 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6765 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6765 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6765 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=245 n_q2=250 n_q3=204 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nQkzEEX1QB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=247, passed=6820 Got 6820 stars (including 6572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6820 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6761 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.211 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=243 n_q2=250 n_q3=206 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.143 ref2=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.402 worst_q_ratio=1.220 new1=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.233 new2=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.254 reference average sigma_overall=0.3925 worst_q_ratio=1.1815 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20516_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 20516_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    10.90    10:20:07.45 +32:51:07.8   0679 5906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    10.91    10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.8   0680 5906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20735_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 20735_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.50    09:24:30.59 +42:18:17.8   7724 0651   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:24:30.59 +42:18:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01580_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 01580_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    7.88    09:53:43.19 +34:55:35.9   4131 4992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.19 +34:55:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01302_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 01302_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    7.96    09:45:34.33 +34:30:43.4   5123 5305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.33 +34:30:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:17.032 +37:58:27.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 Second-epoch image center 09:49:17.032 +37:58:27.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0462 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:17.467 +37:58:26.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 Second-epoch image center 09:49:17.467 +37:58:26.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0475 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:49:17.032 +37:58:27.19 Second-epoch second image center 09:49:17.467 +37:58:26.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00144 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00144 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rYXPn8scQT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vgRTQ60Gw6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I5gyu4bKOw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DVv1KMV0vg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat) found 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec +31.9971 to +43.3850 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec 31.9971 to 43.3850 deg Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3545 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec +31.9971 to +43.3850 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec 31.9971 to 43.3850 deg Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3545 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 40814 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3396 to 157.6197 deg, Dec +32.0331 to +43.3967 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3396 to 157.6197 deg, Dec 32.0331 to 43.3967 deg Loaded 5381 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3990 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3990 out of 40814 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 37 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.0 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 3.6 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 3.6 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits 2.0 pix wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.0 pix wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 15.6 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 15.0 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 15.0 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.rYXPn8scQT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1991, passed=40726 Got 40726 stars (including 38650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40726 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40287 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=231 n_q2=212 n_q3=243 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.vgRTQ60Gw6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2016, passed=40792 Got 40792 stars (including 38709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40792 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=233 n_q2=208 n_q3=246 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.I5gyu4bKOw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=972, passed=27210 Got 27210 stars (including 26223 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27210 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26978 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26978 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26978 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=240 n_q2=247 n_q3=210 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.DVv1KMV0vg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=968, passed=27235 Got 27235 stars (including 26246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27235 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27016 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27016 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=242 n_q2=247 n_q3=206 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:19:58.79 +35:49:27.0: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:16:40.64 +33:44:32.4: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:36:34.87 +35:11:31.0: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:11:35.91 +38:21:09.9: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:19:58.79 +35:49:27.0: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:16:40.64 +33:44:32.4: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:36:34.87 +35:11:31.0: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:58.79 +35:49:27.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4665 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:16:40.64 +33:44:32.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6696 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:34.87 +35:11:31.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2944 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:11:35.91 +38:21:09.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:11:35.91 +38:21:09.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7932 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:19.5: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:34:51.58 +39:37:37.3: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:25:40.47 +38:35:56.6: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:19.5: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:19.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1252 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:34:51.58 +39:37:37.3: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:51.58 +39:37:37.3: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3857 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:25:40.47 +38:35:56.6: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:25:40.47 +38:35:56.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6141 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:19:27.04 +32:51:14.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:19:27.04 +32:51:14.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:27.04 +32:51:14.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52806_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 52806_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    14.65    09:16:40.62 +33:44:32.0   8751 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    14.69    09:16:40.66 +33:44:32.8   8752 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52815_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 52815_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    14.47    10:19:58.89 +35:49:28.2   0961 4113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    14.46    10:19:58.68 +35:49:25.9   0962 4113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52816_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 52816_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    14.33    09:36:34.79 +35:11:28.8   6251 4940   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    14.27    09:36:34.95 +35:11:33.2   6252 4939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52819_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 52819_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    13.79    09:11:35.82 +38:21:07.3   9284 3011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.79    09:11:36.01 +38:21:12.4   9284 3010   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52821_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 52821_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.49    10:26:09.90 +39:10:19.8   0527 1990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 10:26:09.94 +39:10:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52931_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 52931_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    11.00    10:20:07.45 +32:51:07.8   0679 5906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    10.99    10:20:07.43 +32:51:08.0   0680 5906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53000_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53000_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    11.60    09:54:34.69 +40:09:36.2   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53115_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53115_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.27    09:18:36.34 +36:47:41.2   8462 3982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:18:36.37 +36:47:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53116_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53116_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.28    09:20:30.76 +40:56:04.4   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53133_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53133_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.42    10:00:46.00 +41:50:20.8   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53171_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53171_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.59    09:58:30.11 +33:12:04.8   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53184_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53184_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.50    09:27:13.77 +37:54:45.4   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53199_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53199_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.73    09:44:19.37 +42:54:36.1   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53244_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53244_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.83    09:54:33.09 +41:06:36.8   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53245_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53245_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.99    10:16:43.29 +39:18:08.3   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53351_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53351_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.13    09:49:14.38 +38:41:01.1   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53359_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53359_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    13.19    09:59:36.01 +36:33:19.3   3492 3955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.07    09:59:36.02 +36:33:19.7   3493 3955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53412_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53412_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.30    09:48:36.08 +33:25:20.8   4708 5943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:48:36.04 +33:25:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53475_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53475_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.35    09:50:08.80 +32:54:09.2   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53503_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53503_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    13.44    09:34:51.61 +39:37:37.9   6522 2269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.34    09:34:51.56 +39:37:36.7   6523 2269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53541_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53541_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.53    09:52:00.37 +42:59:27.6   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53583_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53583_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    13.62    09:25:40.44 +38:35:57.6   7595 2899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.61    09:25:40.50 +38:35:55.7   7596 2899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53587_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53587_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.69    09:44:27.16 +34:05:12.7   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53595_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53595_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.69    10:23:19.58 +33:12:23.2   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53629_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53629_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.87    10:03:34.67 +40:38:01.6   3257 1462   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 10:03:34.72 +40:38:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53639_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53639_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.99    10:18:28.67 +37:15:32.9   1268 3276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 10:18:28.65 +37:15:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53651_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53651_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    14.01    10:03:18.19 +41:18:51.4   3328 1055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 10:03:18.26 +41:18:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53664_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53664_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.81    10:07:18.39 +39:22:56.8   2749 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53681_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53681_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.90    09:13:12.36 +40:52:41.2   9036 1482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:13:12.38 +40:52:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53799_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53799_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    14.08    10:02:56.08 +37:52:06.4   3168 3130   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 10:02:55.99 +37:52:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53800_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 53800_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    13.82    09:59:42.16 +41:12:52.9   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54059_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 54059_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.18481    2461177.68481    14.64    10:19:27.14 +32:51:15.6   0765 5916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    14.63    10:19:26.94 +32:51:12.5   0766 5917   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54080_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 54080_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    14.66    09:43:05.27 +39:55:39.0   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12707_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 12707_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    10.01    09:40:15.20 +36:06:18.7   5819 4373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:40:15.20 +36:06:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06169_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 06169_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    8.04    09:45:34.34 +34:30:43.4   5123 5305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.33 +34:30:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06076_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 06076_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    12.74    09:39:25.66 +34:14:52.7   5881 5499   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:39:25.65 +34:14:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07716_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 The candidate 07716_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.18520    2461177.68520    7.89    09:53:43.19 +34:55:35.9   4131 4992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_234401_TTUQ1b1x1_2078010_qFzS1S6W/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-26-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0113.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.19 +34:55:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461177.68480795 -observatory V36 03:46:54.40 +20:31:58.0 Mercury (-2.1mag) 05:48:32.72 +24:56:47.8 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:46:18.53 +10:09:36.3 Mars (1.2mag) 07:31:16.06 +22:11:08.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:05.49 +02:07:17.4 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:54:52.78 +20:09:47.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:14:25.85 +00:06:48.9 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:10.00 -22:57:28.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 03:48:09.94 +24:27:23.7 Moon (99.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 16 23:47 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461177.68480795: 07:31:13.77 +22:11:12.3 Io (5.9mag) 07:31:06.22 +22:11:34.9 Europa (6.1mag) 07:31:01.02 +22:11:44.0 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:31:35.43 +22:10:26.3 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:32:54.24 +21:48:36.1 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:31:14.29 +22:11:12.6 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:33:20.38 +22:13:31.5 Elara (17.4mag) 07:32:11.59 +22:34:43.2 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:38:42.84 +22:11:25.3 Carme (18.7mag) 00:42:09.78 +02:07:42.2 Titan (8.7mag) 00:42:01.68 +02:07:25.8 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:42:07.70 +02:05:54.8 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:42:00.08 +02:07:03.5 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:43:13.09 +02:12:17.8 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 16 23:48 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461177.68480795: 17:07:45.72 -31:05:58.8 JWST 19:13:58.54 +14:51:52.3 Chandra 18:13:45.01 -33:10:18.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 16 23:48 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461177.68480795 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 13:29:41.93 -27:57:16.5 14.6mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:21:56.39 +30:51:55.0 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:34:35.01 +00:51:31.3 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:13:46.54 +24:17:12.5 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 08:25:41.25 +22:04:08.0 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:54:18.14 -30:56:55.3 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:32:30.07 -68:29:00.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:41:15.53 +31:42:32.0 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:23:08.15 +13:49:41.9 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:49.45 +30:37:58.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:06:53.79 +26:43:49.2 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:15:39.77 +31:43:15.8 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:40:04.74 +02:37:07.7 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:41:26.70 +20:46:12.6 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:28:16.22 -11:06:26.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:49.92 -07:37:19.0 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:14:41.41 +65:01:03.2 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:35:49.55 -04:53:58.7 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 14:37:42.73 +87:26:29.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:43:01.83 +63:43:59.1 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:12:00.28 +25:17:10.7 12.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:55:25.66 +11:06:13.4 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:22:26.32 +24:24:00.5 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:56:01.78 -18:11:45.9 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:45:08.24 +38:30:34.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:59:33.14 +53:23:56.7 16.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:01:31.99 -09:12:29.2 11.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:42:50.38 +04:25:44.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:17:31.49 +41:31:35.2 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:12:15.05 -13:26:14.4 16.1mag A/2026 E1 19:42:48.56 -08:14:04.7 10.0mag 10P/Tempel 14:24:08.10 -01:07:18.2 16.8mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:03.25 -00:53:21.4 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:45:54.20 -02:37:26.2 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:37:22.25 +22:30:33.7 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:13:12.80 +29:43:08.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:05:39.56 -08:06:22.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:33:27.62 +29:59:07.2 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:16:42.14 +13:57:24.1 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:29:10.00 -00:29:10.4 15.1mag 88P/Howell 03:44:09.70 +27:34:56.6 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:59:32.37 +33:19:16.9 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:13:09.40 +24:13:48.1 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:22:52.95 +17:31:33.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:49:32.53 +17:40:58.3 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 04:13:32.11 +19:34:21.1 12.0mag 141P/Machholz 04:16:59.17 +14:43:40.6 11.9mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:58:31.39 +11:18:38.8 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:41:24.47 -28:10:26.4 17.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:32:18.93 +14:02:07.5 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:30:45.94 -03:43:01.4 18.0mag 169P/NEAT 17:08:49.06 -10:13:06.3 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 06:44:26.11 +35:55:04.9 17.2mag 240P/NEAT 23:35:30.73 -11:09:22.1 17.0mag 260P/McNaught 03:07:38.95 +27:57:54.3 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR 15:26:44.47 +08:19:24.9 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:50:56.72 +21:11:17.6 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:24:11.22 +43:10:03.3 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 16 23:48 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 16 23:47 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 16 23:47 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 11:05:13.920 -00:28:49.93 AT 2026mci 2026-05-03.59 21.84 10:43:17.140 +04:09:18.06 AT 2026mch 2026-05-03.59 21.97 13:59:38.170 +00:14:00.67 AT 2026mcg 2026-04-12.73 22.18 13:22:56.780 -01:33:23.87 AT 2026mcf 2026-04-12.71 22.19 14:27:03.250 -01:08:37.27 AT 2026mce 2026-03-18.85 22.34 13:00:36.733 +01:30:56.56 AT 2026mcd 2026-05-07.71 21.3 13:33:34.230 -20:38:04.35 AT 2026mcc 2026-05-10.28 16.89 12:30:05.331 -04:12:46.40 AT 2026mcb 2026-05-07.46 20.36 15:16:07.359 +03:48:05.28 AT 2026mca 2026-05-10.32 19.8154 10:14:10.957 +74:43:32.14 AT 2026mbz 2026-05-08.20 19.8513 14:32:22.297 +06:03:53.38 AT 2026mby 2026-05-07.25 20.4511 16:13:49.469 +47:54:54.22 AT 2026mbx 2026-05-10.34 19.5733 15:37:46.542 +37:59:22.34 AT 2026mbw 2026-05-09.37 19.7777 16:01:23.989 +62:24:50.37 AT 2026mbv 2026-05-07.32 20.0951 11:48:23.834 -40:55:34.22 AT 2026mbu 2026-05-11.39 19.96 12:10:44.247 +34:44:39.26 AT 2026mbt 2026-05-09.90 19.13 10:20:00.378 -03:51:57.56 AT 2026mbs 2026-05-11.05 19.493 10:48:39.561 -06:48:28.31 AT 2026mbr 2026-05-11.38 20.26 10:50:02.082 -38:17:48.70 AT 2026mbq 2026-04-21.46 20.67 15:00:09.974 -20:41:38.57 AT 2026mbp 2026-01-15.56 19.2499 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 16 23:47 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C