This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1238 2461177.6238 11.62 04:55:33.02 +54:40:39.4
153.57438 7.05342 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS 2134204
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.540 g Y 0.794 g 2458522.60670 148.125319500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 04:55:33.02 +54:40:39.4: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 04:55:33.02 +54:40:39.4: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 2134204,2461177.6238,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 2134204 20260517.1238 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1238 2461177.6238 13.20 05:32:11.17 +54:04:05.9
157.16573 11.08100 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS J0532113+540409
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.688 R1 Y 0.413 R1 115.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:32:11.17 +54:04:05.9: 14.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:32:11.17 +54:04:05.9: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0532113+540409,2461177.6238,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0532113+540409 20260517.1238 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1238 2461177.6238 12.71 05:25:08.77 +54:10:41.2
156.51350 10.26550 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0525083+541043
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.090 r Y 1.104 r 2458346.49400 362.460965200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:25:08.77 +54:10:41.2: 13.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:25:08.77 +54:10:41.2: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0525083+541043,2461177.6238,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0525083+541043 20260517.1238 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461177.62397801 17.05.2026 02:58:21.700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18269
Objects passed selection criteria: 18233
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16397.2
Average stars matched: 15753 (96.071 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 123716 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 22:04:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461177.62397801 17.05.2026 02:58:21.700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 128333
Objects passed selection criteria: 128095
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107904
Average stars matched: 103205 (95.6448 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1903300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 22:07:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.62352354
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:39:00.652 +54:00:09.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:00.652 +54:00:09.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0344 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:59.972 +53:59:40.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:38:59.972 +53:59:40.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:39:00.652 +54:00:09.14
Second-epoch second image center 05:38:59.972 +53:59:40.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00805 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4IAizvL8tZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VrhvLSa0gl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J0Dl1xfFvb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pDlqG17sTC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4455 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4455 deg
Loaded 11842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7480 out of 8307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8307 out of 21171 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.951300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.951300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4455 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4455 deg
Loaded 11842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7480 out of 8307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8307 out of 21171 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 19819 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.2049 to 100.1174 deg, Dec +47.7375 to +59.3621 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.2049 to 100.1174 deg, Dec 47.7375 to 59.3621 deg
Loaded 11628 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7484 out of 8216 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8216 out of 19819 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.1 pix Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.3 mag. Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4IAizvL8tZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1951, passed=21171
Got 21171 stars (including 19188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=205 n_q2=257 n_q3=195 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VrhvLSa0gl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1796, passed=19819
Got 19819 stars (including 17995 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19819 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=228 n_q2=196 n_q3=235 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.J0Dl1xfFvb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=606, passed=12391
Got 12391 stars (including 11772 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12391 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=262 n_q2=181 n_q3=266 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.423
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pDlqG17sTC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=659, passed=12638
Got 12638 stars (including 11965 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12638 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=260 n_q2=187 n_q3=264 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.497
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.095
ref2=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.423
new2=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.497
reference average sigma_overall=0.3985 worst_q_ratio=1.192
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32486_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 32486_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:56.10 +51:37:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32494_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 32494_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:46.36 +54:26:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32497_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 32497_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:04.51 +51:46:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32504_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 32504_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:44.37 +54:17:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13894_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 13894_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:31.00 +55:27:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04199_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 04199_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:01.58 +50:29:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05858_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 05858_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:15.31 +49:54:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04099_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 04099_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:04.38 +50:07:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15065_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 15065_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:25.53 +54:28:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17026_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 17026_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:51.87 +56:10:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:39:00.652 +54:00:09.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:00.652 +54:00:09.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0344 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:59.972 +53:59:40.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:38:59.972 +53:59:40.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:39:00.652 +54:00:09.14
Second-epoch second image center 05:38:59.972 +53:59:40.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00805 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h4mXYg7Sp9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UM7ndcESiV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sVFjMwgBDO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5DmQQRGEkK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 155080 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4472 deg
Loaded 11908 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6184 out of 8396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8396 out of 155080 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 155080 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4472 deg
Loaded 11908 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6184 out of 8396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8396 out of 155080 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 142069 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.1270 to 100.1968 deg, Dec +47.6937 to +59.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.1270 to 100.1968 deg, Dec 47.6937 to 59.3623 deg
Loaded 11742 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6279 out of 8346 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8346 out of 142069 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 89 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.h4mXYg7Sp9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=17009, passed=155028
Got 155028 stars (including 137750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=210 n_q2=258 n_q3=202 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UM7ndcESiV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=15126, passed=142029
Got 142029 stars (including 126649 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142029 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=239 n_q2=189 n_q3=243 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sVFjMwgBDO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=4592, passed=68368
Got 68368 stars (including 63706 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=263 n_q2=181 n_q3=260 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5DmQQRGEkK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=4418, passed=69260
Got 69260 stars (including 64767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=263 n_q2=185 n_q3=257 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.345
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_220201_TTUQ1b1x1_4088938_oinLrHma/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 06:13:10.02 +52:11:01.4: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:46:13.85 +56:11:22.3: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 06:10:21.52 +51:21:28.4: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:53:08.96 +49:54:33.8: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:46:13.85 +56:11:22.3: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:13.85 +56:11:22.3: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9648 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:53:08.96 +49:54:33.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 06:13:10.02 +52:11:01.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:08.96 +49:54:33.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4833 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:10.02 +52:11:01.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8951 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 06:10:21.52 +51:21:28.4: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:21.52 +51:21:28.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4547 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 06:01:54.84 +49:18:26.6: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:07:22.10 +50:19:25.2: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 06:27:26.09 +54:21:21.6: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 06:01:54.84 +49:18:26.6: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:54.84 +49:18:26.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4582 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 06:27:26.09 +54:21:21.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:07:22.10 +50:19:25.2: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:26.09 +54:21:21.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5106 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:22.10 +50:19:25.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2962 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:54:17.48 +52:15:13.6: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:34:52.94 +52:57:02.5: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:41:35.71 +53:28:03.8: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:54:17.48 +52:15:13.6: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:17.48 +52:15:13.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6857 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:20:31.25 +54:50:58.1: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:41:35.71 +53:28:03.8: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:35.71 +53:28:03.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7903 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:34:52.94 +52:57:02.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:52.94 +52:57:02.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6926 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:55:59.17 +54:49:43.8: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 04:49:51.60 +49:54:32.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:20:31.25 +54:50:58.1: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:31.25 +54:50:58.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7092 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:55:59.17 +54:49:43.8: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:59.17 +54:49:43.8: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8768 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 04:49:51.60 +49:54:32.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:51.60 +49:54:32.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 04:55:33.02 +54:40:39.4: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:32:11.17 +54:04:05.9: 14.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 04:55:33.02 +54:40:39.4: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 04:49:16.18 +51:00:54.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:55:33.02 +54:40:39.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6208 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 04:50:31.98 +48:50:03.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:32:11.17 +54:04:05.9: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:32:11.17 +54:04:05.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1891 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 04:49:16.18 +51:00:54.4: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:16.18 +51:00:54.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 04:50:31.98 +48:50:03.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:31.98 +48:50:03.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:25:08.77 +54:10:41.2: 13.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 05:50:24.65 +51:50:16.6: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:25:08.77 +54:10:41.2: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:25:08.77 +54:10:41.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7103 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:50:24.65 +51:50:16.6: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:24.65 +51:50:16.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8899 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out143242.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88477.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92140.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182710_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182710_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:25.03 +56:58:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182718_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182718_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182724_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182724_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:20.60 +54:46:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182727_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182727_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182731_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182731_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182737_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182737_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:29.56 +49:51:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182740_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182740_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182764_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182764_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:44.41 +54:17:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182774_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182774_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:13.04 +55:41:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182775_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182775_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:04.93 +53:35:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182776_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182776_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:44.58 +54:23:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182783_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182783_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:50.24 +54:15:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182788_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182788_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:42.18 +55:40:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182803_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182803_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:27.50 +50:19:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182811_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182811_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:39.82 +58:06:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182817_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182817_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.00 +58:48:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182825_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182825_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:45.82 +49:53:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182827_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182827_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:45.96 +56:56:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182828_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182828_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:03.39 +55:42:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182834_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182834_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:08.31 +51:03:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182872_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182872_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:35.73 +52:39:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182898_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182898_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:56.79 +54:35:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182962_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182962_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:10.26 +56:43:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182968_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 182968_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:25.76 +52:30:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183012_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183012_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:53.42 +51:20:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183033_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183033_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:15.22 +54:54:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183048_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183048_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:16.31 +52:52:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183054_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183054_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:03.47 +53:56:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183059_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183059_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:04.87 +50:00:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183070_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183070_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183086_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183086_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183090_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183090_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183098_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183098_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.41 +56:56:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183104_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183104_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:00.06 +56:51:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183119_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183119_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:22.64 +55:21:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183123_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183123_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:59.81 +49:03:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183135_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183135_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:01.95 +50:57:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183145_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183145_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:05.86 +56:24:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183163_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183163_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:46.39 +56:55:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183178_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183178_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:24.14 +57:53:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183184_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183184_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:02.18 +54:46:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183185_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183185_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:43.97 +55:30:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183190_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183190_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183196_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183196_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:30.03 +49:55:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183197_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183197_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:25.65 +52:43:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183204_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183204_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:12.68 +56:22:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183216_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183216_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:00.64 +54:45:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183238_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183238_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183247_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183247_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183251_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183251_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:01.38 +58:12:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183254_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183254_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:39.57 +50:23:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183256_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183256_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:25.11 +53:33:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183260_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183260_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:04.07 +49:32:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183262_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183262_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:50.28 +50:34:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183268_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183268_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:06.63 +54:48:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183295_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183295_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183300_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183300_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:24.90 +56:05:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183303_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183303_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.94 +57:49:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183304_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183304_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183307_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183307_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:11.73 +53:10:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183311_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 183311_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:59.69 +53:35:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143242_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 143242_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171748_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 171748_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121974_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 121974_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:48.27 +57:15:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88477_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 88477_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51762_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 51762_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:16.52 +50:51:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126849_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 126849_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:59.24 +57:53:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29073_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 29073_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:04.38 +50:07:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140800_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 140800_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:25.53 +54:28:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88976_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 88976_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:49.44 +54:21:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150174_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 150174_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:31.02 +55:27:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124117_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 124117_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:51.86 +56:10:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178764_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 178764_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:55.73 +51:37:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171506_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 171506_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94357_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 94357_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:04.17 +53:51:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171137_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 171137_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56402_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 56402_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:27.92 +51:03:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136027_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 136027_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:23.79 +55:49:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42001_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 42001_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:15.31 +49:54:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57109_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 57109_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:18.96 +51:37:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50775_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 50775_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:04.46 +51:46:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141855_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 141855_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:51.03 +55:53:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133856_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 133856_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:56.81 +56:05:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148807_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 148807_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:03.64 +54:02:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92140_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 92140_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91864_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 91864_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:26.09 +53:41:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56837_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 56837_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.72 +52:02:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29380_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 29380_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:01.56 +50:29:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51160_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 51160_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-58-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks