This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3352 2461176.8352 14.78 11:19:38.66 +60:30:16.2
141.60890 53.16794 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.8" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:19:38.66 +60:30:16.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:19:38.66 +60:30:16.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:19:38.66 +60:30:16.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.3352* 11 19 38.66 +60 30 16.2 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461176.8352,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260516.3352 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3352 2461176.8352 14.84 10:05:46.86 +66:55:43.8
143.66559 42.92713 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:05:46.86 +66:55:43.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:05:46.86 +66:55:43.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:05:46.86 +66:55:43.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.3352* 10 05 46.86 +66 55 43.8 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461176.8352,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260516.3352 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3352 2461176.8352 14.90 10:40:19.49 +57:49:04.2
150.63924 51.67150 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:40:19.49 +57:49:04.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:40:19.49 +57:49:04.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:40:19.49 +57:49:04.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.3352* 10 40 19.49 +57 49 04.2 14.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461176.8352,14.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260516.3352 14.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3352 2461176.8352 14.74 09:31:52.01 +60:05:10.8
154.32949 42.93453 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:31:52.01 +60:05:10.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 09:31:52.01 +60:05:10.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:31:52.01 +60:05:10.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.3352* 09 31 52.01 +60 05 10.8 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461176.8352,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260516.3352 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3352 2461176.8352 14.93 10:56:54.23 +61:49:53.7
143.72763 50.41948 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:56:54.23 +61:49:53.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:56:54.23 +61:49:53.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:56:54.23 +61:49:53.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.3352* 10 56 54.23 +61 49 53.7 14.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461176.8352,14.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260516.3352 14.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.80532322 11.02.2026 07:19:29.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
First image: 2461082.80532322 11.02.2026 07:19:29.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Last image: 2461176.83543350 16.05.2026 08:02:51.454 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7712
Objects passed selection criteria: 7701
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6814.75
Average stars matched: 6581.75 (96.5809 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 04:02:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.80532322 11.02.2026 07:19:29.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
First image: 2461082.80532322 11.02.2026 07:19:29.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Last image: 2461176.83543350 16.05.2026 08:02:51.454 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41464
Objects passed selection criteria: 41340
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35532.5
Average stars matched: 34177 (96.1852 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 04:04:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.83503324
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:42.336 +62:02:19.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80
Second-epoch image center 10:17:42.336 +62:02:19.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0868 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:42.707 +62:02:23.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80
Second-epoch image center 10:17:42.707 +62:02:23.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0880 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:42.336 +62:02:19.54
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:42.707 +62:02:23.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00135 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00135 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AL3lgjQreG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xrRxmPSpBw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RZMnhA2DxJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aonGCNvwtI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7643 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1814 to 172.7540 deg, Dec +55.2234 to +67.4791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1814 to 172.7540 deg, Dec 55.2234 to 67.4791 deg
Loaded 7304 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4370 out of 4605 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4605 out of 7643 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7643 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1814 to 172.7540 deg, Dec +55.2234 to +67.4791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1814 to 172.7540 deg, Dec 55.2234 to 67.4791 deg
Loaded 7304 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4370 out of 4605 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4605 out of 7643 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1813 to 172.7538 deg, Dec +55.2234 to +67.4798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1813 to 172.7538 deg, Dec 55.2234 to 67.4798 deg
Loaded 7305 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4361 out of 4610 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4610 out of 7662 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
2.1 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
2.8 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
2.8 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AL3lgjQreG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, passed=7643
Got 7643 stars (including 7078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7643 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=236 n_q2=225 n_q3=242 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xrRxmPSpBw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=562, passed=7662
Got 7662 stars (including 7088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=229 n_q2=228 n_q3=238 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.359
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RZMnhA2DxJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=284, passed=6043
Got 6043 stars (including 5748 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=262 n_q2=246 n_q3=229 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aonGCNvwtI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=292, passed=6084
Got 6084 stars (including 5786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6084 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=263 n_q2=248 n_q3=226 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.317
ref2=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.359
new1=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new2=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.141
reference average sigma_overall=0.3715 worst_q_ratio=1.338
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:28:44.34 +61:34:53.6: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:05:59.33 +61:20:56.3: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:28:44.34 +61:34:53.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:44.34 +61:34:53.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2701 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:05:59.33 +61:20:56.3: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:59.33 +61:20:56.3: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2745 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20670_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 20670_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:17.32 +59:56:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20833_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 20833_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20836_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 20836_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:42.336 +62:02:19.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80
Second-epoch image center 10:17:42.336 +62:02:19.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0868 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:42.707 +62:02:23.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80
Second-epoch image center 10:17:42.707 +62:02:23.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0880 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:42.336 +62:02:19.54
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:42.707 +62:02:23.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00135 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00135 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C978PZqYS1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IowU6Hzu7G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OgtzdTYv4V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FSBGJPjTFt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1815 to 172.8776 deg, Dec +55.2077 to +67.4859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1815 to 172.8776 deg, Dec 55.2077 to 67.4859 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4155 out of 4668 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4668 out of 42264 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.756400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.756400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1815 to 172.8776 deg, Dec +55.2077 to +67.4859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1815 to 172.8776 deg, Dec 55.2077 to 67.4859 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4155 out of 4668 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4668 out of 42264 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 42564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1813 to 172.8782 deg, Dec +55.2076 to +67.4899 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1813 to 172.8782 deg, Dec 55.2076 to 67.4899 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4153 out of 4662 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4662 out of 42564 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
1.9 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.C978PZqYS1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1963, passed=42243
Got 42243 stars (including 40203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits N_match=982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=235 n_q2=225 n_q3=245 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.390
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IowU6Hzu7G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1976, passed=42549
Got 42549 stars (including 40495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42549 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=232 n_q2=223 n_q3=242 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OgtzdTYv4V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=889, passed=29216
Got 29216 stars (including 28280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=266 n_q2=243 n_q3=233 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FSBGJPjTFt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=928, passed=29087
Got 29087 stars (including 28113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=271 n_q2=247 n_q3=224 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_035928_TTUQ1b1x1_1840148_C47YBR01/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:25:58.18 +63:20:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:28:36.58 +65:13:49.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:25:58.18 +63:20:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:58.18 +63:20:42.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:28:36.58 +65:13:49.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:36.58 +65:13:49.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:14:38.17 +63:56:44.8: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:27:59.65 +64:48:52.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:14:38.17 +63:56:44.8: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:38.17 +63:56:44.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1035 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:27:59.65 +64:48:52.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:59.65 +64:48:52.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:59:29.34 +65:09:36.7: 15.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:19:38.66 +60:30:16.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:05:46.86 +66:55:43.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:40:19.49 +57:49:04.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 09:31:52.01 +60:05:10.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:59:29.34 +65:09:36.7: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:59:29.34 +65:09:36.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8283 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:19:38.66 +60:30:16.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:05:46.86 +66:55:43.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:56:54.23 +61:49:53.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:40:19.49 +57:49:04.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:48:58.48 +61:51:24.3: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:31:52.01 +60:05:10.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:56:54.23 +61:49:53.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:48:58.48 +61:51:24.3: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:48:58.48 +61:51:24.3: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8738 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 168: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55105.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55127.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55140.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55164.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 26s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53040_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53044_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:58.29 +66:47:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53256_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53256_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53337_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53337_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53364_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53364_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53385_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53385_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53400_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53400_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:57.42 +63:32:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53471_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53471_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53480_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53480_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53593_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53593_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53625_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53625_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53651_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53651_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53733_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53841_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53841_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53842_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53859_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53859_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53931_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53992_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53992_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:07.79 +61:43:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53999_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 53999_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:47:52.40 +65:28:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54072_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54072_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54083_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54083_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54204_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54204_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54215_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54215_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:36:47.36 +56:59:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54276_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54276_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54300_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54300_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54340_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54340_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54346_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54346_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:25:08.74 +63:32:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54378_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54378_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:26.68 +59:25:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54418_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54418_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54419_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54422_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54422_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:50.36 +58:25:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54463_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54463_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:38.49 +64:58:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54477_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54477_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54479_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54479_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54495_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54495_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54535_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54535_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54567_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54580_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54580_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:29:38.34 +60:01:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54593_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54593_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:57.28 +58:41:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54597_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54597_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:47.06 +58:42:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54626_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54626_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:53.57 +59:40:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54651_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54651_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54679_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54679_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54684_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54684_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54709_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54709_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54724_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54724_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54732_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54732_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54760_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54760_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54769_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54769_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54835_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54835_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54856_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54856_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54925_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54925_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54938_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54938_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54952_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54952_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55019_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55019_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55039_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55039_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55050_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55050_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55055_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55055_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55056_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55056_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55057_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55057_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55072_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55072_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55084_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55084_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55088_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55088_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55102_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55102_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55104_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55104_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55105_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 55105_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55124_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55124_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55127_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 55127_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55129_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55129_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55140_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 55140_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55141_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 55141_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55164_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 55164_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55168_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55168_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55174_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55174_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55178_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 55178_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01359_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 01359_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11017_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 11017_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
