Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 16.3361  2461176.8361  14.46  10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8
136.33674  39.37648 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 0.8 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 1"  CP Dra                        
Type: UGSU
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    14.500   V            20.100   V                                0.080800000000   em:                          
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8:  16.06 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8:  16.09 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -crosshair 3257.70654 918.70050 image    wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits -crosshair 3258.38184 919.17639 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 16.33614 10 15 40.02 +73 26 04.8          14.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 16.33593 10 15 40.03 +73 26 05.7          14.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 16.33634 10 15 40.02 +73 26 04.0          14.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 16.3361*  10 15 40.02 +73 26 04.8  14.5 U             Dra       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CP Dra,2461176.8361,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CP Dra 20260516.3361 14.46CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 16.3361  2461176.8361  14.63  09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5
146.37163  38.56811 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.6" and 0.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5:  16.17 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -crosshair 5878.46924 4850.47461 image    wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits -crosshair 5878.77686 4851.00586 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 16.33614 09 16 18.06 +67 19 32.5          14.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 16.33593 09 16 17.67 +67 19 34.2          14.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 16.33634 09 16 18.44 +67 19 30.9          14.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 16.3361*  09 16 18.06 +67 19 32.5  14.6 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461176.8361,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260516.3361 14.63CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
First image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Last  image: 2461176.83634451 16.05.2026 08:04:10.166   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 19
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  8828
Objects passed selection criteria:  8819
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 7957.25
Average stars matched: 7725.25 (97.0844 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   114100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat May 16 04:02:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
First image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Last  image: 2461176.83634451 16.05.2026 08:04:10.166   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.25
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  49409
Objects passed selection criteria:  49285
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 43473.5
Average stars matched: 42076.8 (96.7871 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   149416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat May 16 04:04:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 621694 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 621694 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits_preview.png'

UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits


renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits_preview.png'

UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1144.4880
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 520.9182
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1144.5395
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 520.9196
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.14677
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-16T03:03:34.2441179' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-16T08:03:34.2441179' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61176.3358130092 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-16T08:03:44.1453218' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61176.3359276042 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      143.99988566362 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     69.9998188167613 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     25.5277777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     338.813333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.31064154489822 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29446 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29446 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            31.302504 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            19.101528 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits :)

Spent 0.806780 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-16T03:04:10.1668538' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-16T08:04:10.1668538' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61176.336228773 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-16T08:04:20.0691428' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61176.3363433913 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     143.999885758167 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     69.9998188253801 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     25.4827777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     338.841111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.31440755219471 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29446 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29446 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits :)

Spent 0.797838 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits



fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.83592875
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:46.392 +70:02:36.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:46.392 +70:02:36.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0667 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:47.470 +70:02:36.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:47.470 +70:02:36.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0676 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:36:46.392 +70:02:36.74
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:47.470 +70:02:36.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00153 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00153 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nQD8VmbC0K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BX6Z39Mu1T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cVGwDNwaVp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3dxHJkO7hT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5136 out of 5418 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5418 out of 8894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  12.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nQD8VmbC0K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, passed=8779
Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=198 n_q2=294 n_q3=212 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BX6Z39Mu1T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, passed=8894
Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=199 n_q2=283 n_q3=224 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cVGwDNwaVp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, passed=7175
Got 7175 stars (including 6826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7175 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=235 n_q2=270 n_q3=242 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3dxHJkO7hT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=7159
Got 7159 stars (including 6809 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7159 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=234 n_q2=275 n_q3=240 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.330
ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.111
new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.149
reference average sigma_overall=0.3945 worst_q_ratio=1.302
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:55:33.43 +71:04:04.0:  12.39 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:57:08.82 +69:58:07.4:  12.39 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:51:57.01 +67:08:57.4:  12.57 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:41:53.92 +69:06:36.3:  12.33 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:49:18.02 +70:10:23.6:  12.55 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:47:20.40 +71:34:23.1:  12.37 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:46:46.69 +70:33:07.9:  12.24 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:53:30.51 +71:24:01.6:  12.33 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:11:32.64 +70:40:02.7:  12.56 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:36:16.69 +71:11:23.6:  12.42 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:57:08.82 +69:58:07.4:  12.40 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:08.82 +69:58:07.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2414 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:51:57.01 +67:08:57.4:  12.63 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:57.01 +67:08:57.4: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1559 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:41:53.92 +69:06:36.3:  12.32 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:49:18.02 +70:10:23.6:  12.58 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:53.92 +69:06:36.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2137 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:49:18.02 +70:10:23.6: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3071 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:53:30.51 +71:24:01.6:  12.36 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:30.51 +71:24:01.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1563 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:47:20.40 +71:34:23.1:  12.41 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:55:33.43 +71:04:04.0:  12.44 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:55:33.43 +71:04:04.0: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2594 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:20.40 +71:34:23.1: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2050 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:11:32.64 +70:40:02.7:  12.54 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:36:16.69 +71:11:23.6:  12.42 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:46:46.69 +70:33:07.9:  12.22 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:16.69 +71:11:23.6: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2565 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:46:46.69 +70:33:07.9: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1191 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:32.64 +70:40:02.7: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2967 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:57:16.83 +72:02:09.1:  12.67 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:37:49.26 +65:33:13.9:  12.59 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:37:30.60 +71:58:12.2:  12.47 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:51:40.90 +67:00:19.3:  12.61 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:47:31.41 +72:28:17.5:  12.64 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:57:16.83 +72:02:09.1:  12.66 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:57:16.83 +72:02:09.1: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3502 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:37:49.26 +65:33:13.9:  12.57 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:51:40.90 +67:00:19.3:  12.54 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:49.26 +65:33:13.9: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3249 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:40.90 +67:00:19.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3012 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:37:30.60 +71:58:12.2:  12.48 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:37:30.60 +71:58:12.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3435 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:47:31.41 +72:28:17.5:  12.64 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:31.41 +72:28:17.5: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3935 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20805_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20805_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.13    09:46:46.69 +70:33:08.0   4308 2849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.11    09:46:46.68 +70:33:07.8   4309 2849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20806_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20806_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.15    10:51:57.00 +67:08:57.3   0373 4014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.16    10:51:57.02 +67:08:57.5   0374 4015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20809_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20809_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.16    09:53:30.49 +71:24:01.8   4039 2304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.15    09:53:30.53 +71:24:01.4   4040 2304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20812_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.18    09:41:53.91 +69:06:36.2   4481 3736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.25    09:41:53.94 +69:06:36.4   4482 3736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20827_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20827_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.22    09:47:20.39 +71:34:23.1   4344 2235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.19    09:47:20.40 +71:34:23.1   4345 2235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20828_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20828_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.23    09:57:08.88 +69:58:07.8   3742 3134   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.25    09:57:08.76 +69:58:07.1   3743 3134   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20830_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20830_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.23    09:55:33.41 +71:04:03.9   3914 2490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.29    09:55:33.45 +71:04:04.0   3915 2490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20831_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20831_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.24    09:36:16.69 +71:11:23.6   4855 2508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.28    09:36:16.68 +71:11:23.7   4855 2508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20838_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20838_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.29    10:49:18.06 +70:10:23.6   1169 2349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.33    10:49:17.98 +70:10:23.6   1170 2349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20840_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20840_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.30    10:11:32.68 +70:40:02.7   3095 2593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.29    10:11:32.61 +70:40:02.7   3096 2594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20848_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20848_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.34    09:37:30.62 +71:58:12.2   4825 2035   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.35    09:37:30.59 +71:58:12.1   4826 2035   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20849_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20849_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.31    10:51:40.89 +67:00:19.5   0356 4102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.29    10:51:40.91 +67:00:19.1   0357 4102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20850_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20850_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.32    10:37:49.31 +65:33:13.9   0866 5214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.33    10:37:49.21 +65:33:13.8   0868 5214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20851_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20851_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.33    10:57:16.78 +72:02:09.2   1215 1153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.38    10:57:16.88 +72:02:08.9   1216 1153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20854_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20854_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.35    09:34:45.35 +74:08:33.0   5022 0732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  09:34:45.33 +74:08:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20866_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 20866_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    12.38    09:47:31.37 +72:28:17.5   4392 1696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.40    09:47:31.45 +72:28:17.4   4392 1696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    8.65    10:44:37.68 +68:46:32.0   1115 3230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  10:44:37.70 +68:46:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    10.93    08:04:00.16 +73:24:29.4   8875 0627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:04:00.19 +73:24:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    9.30    10:55:40.13 +71:52:07.8   1249 1276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  10:55:40.11 +71:52:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:46.392 +70:02:36.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:46.392 +70:02:36.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0667 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:47.470 +70:02:36.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:47.470 +70:02:36.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0676 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:36:46.392 +70:02:36.74
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:47.470 +70:02:36.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00153 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00153 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aafILJoODz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PMU20O5HPy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JQUlH5rUWK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Siy6FmyiaU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec +62.8134 to +75.4919 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec 62.8134 to 75.4919 deg
Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4857 out of 5495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5495 out of 51887 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 1.9 pix  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
 1.9 pix  wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 1.9 pix  wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aafILJoODz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, passed=51519
Got 51519 stars (including 48800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=207 n_q2=283 n_q3=214 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PMU20O5HPy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, passed=51863
Got 51863 stars (including 49079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=214 n_q2=275 n_q3=217 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JQUlH5rUWK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1240, passed=35807
Got 35807 stars (including 34514 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=244 n_q2=261 n_q3=244 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Siy6FmyiaU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1305, passed=35841
Got 35841 stars (including 34489 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35841 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=240 n_q2=265 n_q3=245 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:11:41.58 +70:13:34.5:  13.04 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:11:41.58 +70:13:34.5:  13.03 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:41.58 +70:13:34.5: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2458 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:46:31.81 +65:55:15.6:  13.93 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:02:40.76 +70:44:35.8:  14.15 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:46:31.81 +65:55:15.6:  14.00 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:46:31.81 +65:55:15.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1272 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:02:40.76 +70:44:35.8:  14.13 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:40.76 +70:44:35.8: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1392 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8:  16.06 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8:  16.09 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5:  16.17 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66830.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65381_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65381_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.02    08:56:10.74 +74:54:44.6   6563 0217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65383_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65383_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.34    08:24:41.90 +66:01:00.5   9057 5247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:24:41.76 +66:01:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65384_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65384_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    13.24    08:11:41.66 +70:13:34.7   9105 2585   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.25    08:11:41.51 +70:13:34.3   9106 2584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65385_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65385_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.00    08:19:06.84 +68:06:55.8   9065 3927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65527_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65527_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    11.12    08:17:02.57 +71:49:18.9   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65542_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65542_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    11.49    09:50:01.23 +72:12:41.9   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65583_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65583_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    11.68    09:25:24.93 +66:23:04.2   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65614_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65614_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.03    10:53:30.91 +70:36:33.4   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65622_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65622_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    11.90    10:04:51.20 +67:25:50.8   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65684_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65684_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.35    10:07:31.66 +73:48:39.5   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65689_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65689_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.31    09:55:13.96 +65:13:18.4   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65744_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65744_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.56    09:50:28.06 +73:09:42.0   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65765_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65765_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.55    09:38:30.72 +64:58:10.3   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65878_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65878_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.86    09:36:39.89 +70:45:12.3   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65983_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 65983_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.01    09:26:53.45 +66:08:21.1   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66016_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66016_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.04    08:31:20.17 +66:19:28.9   8613 5151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:31:20.31 +66:19:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66017_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66017_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.28    10:44:00.77 +64:37:08.8   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66081_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66081_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.66    09:44:27.37 +75:03:26.8   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66082_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66082_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.14    08:12:30.00 +68:27:38.7   9370 3626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:12:30.38 +68:27:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66110_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66110_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.34    09:13:06.52 +69:38:49.9   6013 3447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  09:13:06.50 +69:38:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66164_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66164_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.78    10:47:52.46 +65:28:26.3   0246 5059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  10:47:52.53 +65:28:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66249_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66249_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.80    10:52:18.42 +69:47:46.4   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66251_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66251_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.52    08:26:08.06 +70:06:55.2   8398 2842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:26:07.98 +70:06:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66278_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66278_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.84    11:07:23.85 +70:22:34.0   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66299_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66299_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.89    10:07:01.54 +66:17:25.4   2832 5235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  10:07:01.47 +66:17:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66385_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66385_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.99    10:38:06.79 +65:09:12.0   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66397_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66397_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.51    10:53:56.92 +67:31:44.6   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66405_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66405_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.15    10:48:13.92 +67:30:46.0   0659 3883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  10:48:13.94 +67:30:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66432_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66432_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.15    09:51:28.78 +67:51:42.1   3880 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66455_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66455_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.25    10:49:42.72 +66:25:10.3   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66469_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66469_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.14    08:32:57.70 +64:48:08.6   8704 6083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:32:57.61 +64:48:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66492_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66492_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.18    10:49:27.29 +65:55:52.7   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66499_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66499_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.07    09:06:08.19 +68:26:43.7   6425 4151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  09:06:08.10 +68:26:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66525_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66525_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    14.13    09:46:31.71 +65:55:15.3   4040 5630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.13    09:46:31.91 +65:55:16.0   4041 5630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66531_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66531_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.95    09:06:33.61 +68:25:55.1   6402 4160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  09:06:33.55 +68:25:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66535_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66535_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.28    10:18:56.60 +74:19:20.8   3245 0363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  10:18:56.61 +74:19:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66540_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66540_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.72    08:27:41.56 +72:00:53.1   8064 1738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:27:41.71 +72:00:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66541_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66541_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 16.33593    2461176.83593    14.18    10:02:40.74 +70:44:35.7   3538 2630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-03-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.11    10:02:40.78 +70:44:35.8   3539 2630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66555_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66555_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.53    10:49:56.10 +73:47:06.9   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66562_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66562_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.17    09:51:40.93 +66:56:24.5   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66580_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66580_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.46    11:06:18.22 +69:54:19.7   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66601_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66601_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.27    10:53:34.36 +66:38:60.0   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66609_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66609_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.33    10:39:19.59 +69:06:23.0   1455 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66613_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66613_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.03    08:15:55.20 +68:46:23.9   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66616_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66616_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.44    10:51:06.43 +70:16:39.7   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66632_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66632_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.31    10:48:08.00 +72:32:13.1   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66633_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66633_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.60    10:42:11.22 +69:34:39.7   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66660_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66660_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.60    10:25:21.94 +64:07:39.4   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66673_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66673_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.37    10:50:49.41 +68:29:54.2   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66684_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66684_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.36    11:05:01.32 +72:03:12.0   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66688_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66688_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.21    09:25:38.26 +71:17:51.1   5372 2461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  09:25:38.49 +71:17:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66705_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
Preparing report for the candidate 66705_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66726_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66726_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.35    09:49:14.94 +71:34:35.4   4255 2223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  09:49:15.04 +71:34:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66735_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66735_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.63    09:46:34.59 +70:54:33.4   4341 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  09:46:34.28 +70:54:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66742_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66742_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.38    08:15:34.46 +69:01:46.3   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66752_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66752_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.42    08:39:49.82 +72:31:44.0   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66755_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66755_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.57    10:18:06.04 +73:42:10.2   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66803_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66803_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.23    08:19:37.01 +67:49:57.8   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66805_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66805_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.81    10:25:04.47 +66:25:43.4   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66808_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66808_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.85    11:13:07.89 +71:08:57.9   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66830_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
Preparing report for the candidate 66830_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66835_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66835_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.54    09:18:44.44 +74:54:55.5   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66841_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 66841_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    14.54    09:20:56.47 +72:39:41.1   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15185_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 15185_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    12.49    10:42:17.31 +70:51:27.3   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    10.81    08:04:00.19 +73:24:29.5   8875 0627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:04:00.20 +73:24:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    9.55    10:55:40.13 +71:52:07.8   1249 1276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  10:55:40.10 +71:52:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    8.88    10:44:37.67 +68:46:32.0   1115 3230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  10:44:37.69 +68:46:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61594_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225
The candidate 61594_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 16.33634    2461176.83634    13.10    08:25:34.90 +64:59:30.2   9149 5871   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_035126_TTUQ1b1x1_281642_GsYdtVau/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-04-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits

**** FOUND  08:25:34.86 +64:59:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 27s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8
09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5
########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8
09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5
###################################################################################
10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5  -- not a known variable star
10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8  -- a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:16:18.06 +67:19:32.5
10:15:40.02 +73:26:04.8
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461176.83592875 -observatory V36
03:39:20.44 +19:58:33.5 Mercury (-2.2mag)
05:44:04.32 +24:53:35.3 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:43:53.50 +09:55:29.8 Mars (1.2mag)
07:30:39.58 +22:12:24.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:41:46.49 +02:05:25.7 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:54:40.45 +20:09:09.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:14:20.96 +00:06:19.4 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:10.84 -22:57:15.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
02:58:09.58 +21:00:41.9 Moon (-8.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 16 04:02 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461176.83592875:
07:30:44.30 +22:12:14.8 Io (5.9mag)
07:30:35.90 +22:12:32.3 Europa (6.1mag)
07:30:34.63 +22:12:31.6 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:30:50.01 +22:12:06.5 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:32:20.87 +21:50:01.4 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:30:43.21 +22:12:14.0 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:32:47.45 +22:15:15.6 Elara (17.4mag)
07:31:31.99 +22:36:26.7 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:38:08.13 +22:12:38.6 Carme (18.7mag)
00:41:53.97 +02:05:44.8 Titan (8.7mag)
00:41:45.11 +02:05:41.2 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:41:46.57 +02:03:56.5 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:41:38.55 +02:05:17.6 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:42:54.99 +02:10:32.9 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 16 04:02 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461176.83592875:
17:05:58.00 -30:53:40.9 JWST
17:39:26.89 +38:48:17.1 Chandra
08:53:46.16 -50:25:10.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 16 04:02 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461176.83592875 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
13:30:39.53 -28:01:56.5 14.6mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:20:31.39 +30:52:45.1 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:35:20.92 +00:48:02.2 14.8mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:12:25.57 +24:14:54.1 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
08:19:19.72 +22:40:48.4 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:54:31.25 -30:52:58.1 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:31:43.76 -68:30:24.7 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:40:58.59 +31:41:59.9 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:23:25.51 +13:45:14.4 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:48.60 +30:35:35.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:05:51.05 +26:42:58.8 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:15:11.93 +31:44:22.6 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:39:44.07 +02:33:27.2 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:41:53.65 +20:43:23.1 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:28:38.11 -11:06:56.5 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:53.41 -07:43:02.4 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:14:26.22 +64:57:23.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:37:27.32 -04:50:49.7 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
14:47:24.96 +87:34:15.2 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:42:06.79 +63:43:02.5 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:10:33.92 +25:09:35.2 12.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:56:08.21 +10:59:30.7 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:22:36.39 +24:08:22.5 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:55:11.51 -18:17:41.6 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:44:20.19 +38:40:26.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
12:01:10.81 +53:22:45.7 16.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
05:58:30.95 -09:03:23.7 11.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:43:03.34 +04:24:20.2 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:15:40.28 +41:26:19.9 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:12:32.36 -13:53:32.4 16.1mag A/2026 E1
19:41:12.23 -08:15:29.0 10.0mag 10P/Tempel
14:24:46.65 -00:59:07.3 16.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:01.85 -00:53:43.8 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:45:27.10 -02:38:13.7 17.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:36:02.50 +22:22:51.9 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:11:25.85 +29:56:04.0 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:04:45.33 -08:11:06.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:30:50.68 +29:48:15.6 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:14:42.85 +13:48:54.3 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
00:27:01.83 -00:42:42.9 15.1mag 88P/Howell
03:41:29.44 +27:26:12.7 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
05:57:38.74 +33:18:46.6 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:11:47.43 +24:36:21.6 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:21:30.11 +17:26:59.6 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:47:50.60 +17:36:49.1 17.6mag 131P/Mueller
04:09:08.24 +19:31:39.7 11.9mag 141P/Machholz
04:12:41.87 +14:32:19.6 11.8mag 141P-A/Machholz
02:53:59.75 +11:03:30.6 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:40:45.85 -28:19:29.0 17.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:29:45.77 +13:37:41.8 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
17:09:21.73 -10:18:29.4 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
06:42:29.68 +35:54:49.4 17.2mag 240P/NEAT
07:58:07.43 -02:34:47.7 18.0mag 242P/Spahr
23:33:21.09 -11:27:48.0 17.0mag 260P/McNaught
03:05:35.88 +27:46:25.8 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
15:27:13.13 +08:18:39.7 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:50:22.92 +21:11:59.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:22:49.33 +43:13:14.6 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 16 04:02 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.12 16.24
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10    2026-05-13.41 16.8
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10    2026-05-13.41 16.8
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50  ASASSN-26by  2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60  SN2026fjc  2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20  ASASSN-26bv  2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40  ASASSN-26bt  2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10  ASASSN-26bu  2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00  SN 2026eza  2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90  AT2026fsf  2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30  SN 2026enn  2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00  AT 2026ezy  2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30  ASASSN-26bs  2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20  ASASSN-26br  2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40  AT 2023uk  2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10  AT2026fhw  2026-03-14.06 SDSS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 16 04:02 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1  TCP J07032576-1241401  2026-03-10.4268  15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8  PNV J00423682+4116058  2026-03-12.5744  17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1  TCP J07264579-2745141  2026-03-17.4417  14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 16 04:02 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
18:51:53.437 -14:24:27.20  AT 2026mbe  2026-05-09.50 18.22
19:57:19.177 +14:53:10.19  AT 2026mbd  2026-05-07.47 18
16:40:52.672 -01:10:17.77  SN 2026mbc  2026-05-02.42 17.55
17:06:12.819 -16:40:54.28  AT 2026mbb  2026-02-06.56 19.5689
16:57:35.331 +21:47:47.40  AT 2026mba  2026-05-07.43 20.53
06:29:52.132 +51:37:24.24  AT 2026maz  2026-05-06.25 20.11
14:24:27.954 +49:06:41.65  AT 2026may  2026-05-06.42 20.89
08:12:26.744 -14:34:02.26  AT 2026max  2026-05-08.26 19.55
08:26:21.218 -19:09:53.70  AT 2026maw  2026-05-08.26 20.81
14:10:04.550 -06:02:36.44  AT 2026mav  2026-05-07.48 20.04
11:50:36.810 -33:08:06.10  AT 2026mau  2026-04-27.58 19.6
11:31:20.374 -35:35:52.80  AT 2026mat  2026-05-09.39 20.21
14:30:50.141 +14:30:15.50  AT 2026mas  2026-05-07.56 19.63
16:58:28.044 +36:44:17.70  AT 2026mar  2026-05-06.05 19.69
13:52:14.583 +00:55:59.22  AT 2026maq  2026-04-20.100 20.12
18:03:57.548 +11:56:42.99  AT 2026map  2026-05-09.65 19.82
23:31:41.989 +52:34:02.56  AT 2026mao  2026-05-10.59 18.452
14:36:21.491 +29:55:10.64  AT 2026man  2026-05-10.41 19.7749
12:04:17.976 -00:20:39.59  AT 2026mam  2026-04-10.36 18.5394
14:46:55.250 -18:19:26.38  AT 2026mal  2026-04-17.35 18.7819
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 16 04:02 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sat May 16 04:02:06 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 43s (0.72 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 47s (0.78 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 3s (0.05 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 105s (1.75 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 13 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 37s (0.62 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 2s (0.03 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 113s (1.88 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 2s (0.03 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 27s (0.45 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 183s (3.05 min)
FIELD_UMa-01-Q1b1x1: 306s (5.10 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 308s (5.13 min)
Finished: Sat May 16 04:07:14 CDT 2026