This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2733 2461176.7733 13.38 16:42:02.81 -04:09:26.0
12.86140 26.22424 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid 2 -2 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:42:02.81 -04:09:26.0: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:42:02.81 -04:09:26.0: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7733,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2733 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2733 2461176.7733 14.11 16:11:48.94 +03:03:09.7
15.21512 36.47142 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.491 Carina 2 -1 2 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:11:48.94 +03:03:09.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:11:48.94 +03:03:09.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.2733* 16 11 48.94 +03 03 09.7 14.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7733,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2733 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2733 2461176.7733 12.63 16:26:35.06 -05:58:02.8
8.74240 28.39485 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V2616 Oph
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.700 V 13.800 V 2452692.40000 334.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:26:35.06 -05:58:02.8: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:26:35.06 -05:58:02.8: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2616 Oph,2461176.7733,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2616 Oph 20260516.2733 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.98419880 22.02.2026 11:37:04.776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
First image: 2461093.98419880 22.02.2026 11:37:04.776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Last image: 2461176.77438518 16.05.2026 06:34:56.880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 28
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9193
Objects passed selection criteria: 9192
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8899.75
Average stars matched: 8659.25 (97.2977 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117812 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 02:13:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.98419880 22.02.2026 11:37:04.776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
First image: 2461093.98419880 22.02.2026 11:37:04.776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Last image: 2461176.77438518 16.05.2026 06:34:56.880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 71
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57064
Objects passed selection criteria: 56966
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53934
Average stars matched: 52449 (97.2466 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 159652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 02:16:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.77229988
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:04.557 -01:59:15.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92
Second-epoch image center 16:17:04.557 -01:59:15.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0099 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.520 -01:58:46.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92
Second-epoch image center 16:17:07.520 -01:58:46.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0166 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:04.557 -01:59:15.83
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:07.520 -01:58:46.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01471 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4MaxBnRqbm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nHWclrq3PR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qJZtgJdsNa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WnKLxyirxv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9904 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.3823 to 252.2025 deg, Dec -7.2902 to +3.3001 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.3823 to 252.2025 deg, Dec -7.2902 to 3.3001 deg
Loaded 5177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4387 out of 4611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4611 out of 9904 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.964500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.964500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9904 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.3823 to 252.2025 deg, Dec -7.2902 to +3.3001 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.3823 to 252.2025 deg, Dec -7.2902 to 3.3001 deg
Loaded 5177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4387 out of 4611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4611 out of 9904 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8941 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0420 to 252.4955 deg, Dec -7.7609 to +3.8299 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0420 to 252.4955 deg, Dec -7.7609 to 3.8299 deg
Loaded 5975 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4461 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4461 out of 8941 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.4 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
3.6 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
15.0 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4MaxBnRqbm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=620, passed=9902
Got 9902 stars (including 9264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9902 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=204 n_q2=224 n_q3=221 n_q4=319 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nHWclrq3PR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=557, passed=8941
Got 8941 stars (including 8375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 471 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 471 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=221 n_q2=230 n_q3=210 n_q4=310 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.536
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qJZtgJdsNa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=8487
Got 8487 stars (including 8080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.224 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.219 n_q1=231 n_q2=212 n_q3=229 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WnKLxyirxv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=359, passed=8527
Got 8527 stars (including 8162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8527 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=219 n_q2=205 n_q3=239 n_q4=301 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.419
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.169
ref2=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.536
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.272
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.419
reference average sigma_overall=0.3685 worst_q_ratio=1.3525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:56:56.50 +01:18:10.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:02:17.88 -03:00:58.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:04:18.31 +03:02:49.1: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:31:20.38 -05:15:59.5: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:17:00.73 -01:52:56.5: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:27:16.27 -02:32:36.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:05:26.28 -04:12:11.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:04:18.31 +03:02:49.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:31:20.38 -05:15:59.5: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:02:17.88 -03:00:58.3: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:56:56.50 +01:18:10.2: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:20.38 -05:15:59.5: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8182 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:18.31 +03:02:49.1: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0797 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:17.88 -03:00:58.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2445 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:56.50 +01:18:10.2: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1103 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:17:00.73 -01:52:56.5: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:00.73 -01:52:56.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1483 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:10:32.98 +00:22:12.4: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:58:05.11 +00:47:37.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:27:16.27 -02:32:36.5: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:16.27 -02:32:36.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2896 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:05:26.28 -04:12:11.0: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:26.28 -04:12:11.0: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3060 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:10:32.98 +00:22:12.4: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:32.98 +00:22:12.4: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3213 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:58:21.83 -01:36:46.0: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:58:05.11 +00:47:37.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:05.11 +00:47:37.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2540 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:06:54.06 -01:48:44.4: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:10:08.09 -02:17:41.8: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:57:35.54 -03:25:42.2: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:58:21.83 -01:36:46.0: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:21.83 -01:36:46.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3182 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:06:54.06 -01:48:44.4: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:10:08.09 -02:17:41.8: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:57:35.54 -03:25:42.2: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:54.06 -01:48:44.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3180 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:35.54 -03:25:42.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3774 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:08.09 -02:17:41.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3432 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20628_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20628_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.11 +02:10:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20635_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20635_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:08.14 -00:18:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20641_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:39.98 -05:08:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20642_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20642_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:48.76 -03:50:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20646_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20646_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:56.20 +01:57:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20662_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20662_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20676_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20676_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20678_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20678_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20681_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20681_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20686_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20686_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20687_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20687_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:15.17 -00:58:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20689_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20689_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:15.42 +01:49:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20692_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20692_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20693_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20693_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20695_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:01.79 -01:48:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20702_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20702_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:58.44 -03:40:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20703_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20703_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20705_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20705_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20706_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20706_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20710_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20710_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20711_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20711_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20712_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20712_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03303_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 03303_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:28.19 -03:17:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01224_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 01224_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:42.81 -05:46:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07266_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 07266_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:52.69 +01:01:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00519_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 00519_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.22 -06:40:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:04.557 -01:59:15.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92
Second-epoch image center 16:17:04.557 -01:59:15.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0099 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.520 -01:58:46.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92
Second-epoch image center 16:17:07.520 -01:58:46.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0166 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:04.557 -01:59:15.83
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:07.520 -01:58:46.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01471 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Df9BjnmbI9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rsKwduRCRl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yys4wxxjqw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cbb1DrXBMU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66692 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.3802 to 252.2055 deg, Dec -7.2920 to +3.3005 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.3802 to 252.2055 deg, Dec -7.2920 to 3.3005 deg
Loaded 5183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4101 out of 4649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4649 out of 66692 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.841400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.841400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66692 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.3802 to 252.2055 deg, Dec -7.2920 to +3.3005 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.3802 to 252.2055 deg, Dec -7.2920 to 3.3005 deg
Loaded 5183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4101 out of 4649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4649 out of 66692 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 57783 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0235 to 252.5090 deg, Dec -7.8273 to +3.8411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0235 to 252.5090 deg, Dec -7.8273 to 3.8411 deg
Loaded 6018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4021 out of 4523 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4523 out of 57783 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.2 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
3.4 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Df9BjnmbI9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=3339, passed=66677
Got 66677 stars (including 63218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.228 n_q1=203 n_q2=222 n_q3=226 n_q4=319 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rsKwduRCRl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3390, passed=57763
Got 57763 stars (including 54306 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 410 to 471 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 410 to 471 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=220 n_q2=230 n_q3=203 n_q4=320 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.455
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yys4wxxjqw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2183, passed=49982
Got 49982 stars (including 47724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49982 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.241 n_q1=220 n_q2=210 n_q3=239 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cbb1DrXBMU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2230, passed=43224
Got 43224 stars (including 40944 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43224 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=217 n_q2=195 n_q3=243 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-31-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_020724_TTUQ1b1x1_1297456_Fi2K6ril/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:20:29.84 +02:52:51.1: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:47:50.02 +00:41:47.7: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:48:21.07 +00:11:50.2: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:46:26.35 +00:04:58.2: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:42:02.81 -04:09:26.0: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:14:57.73 -02:03:06.1: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:48:26.81 +01:17:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:34.27 +00:03:50.9: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:24:48.94 -02:26:40.6: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:18:04.29 +02:38:24.3: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:20:29.84 +02:52:51.1: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:47:50.02 +00:41:47.7: 13.85 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:48:21.07 +00:11:50.2: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:42:02.81 -04:09:26.0: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:14:57.73 -02:03:06.1: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:29.84 +02:52:51.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5962 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:48:26.81 +01:17:24.5: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:21.07 +00:11:50.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8719 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:50.02 +00:41:47.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5921 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:26.81 +01:17:24.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:46:26.35 +00:04:58.2: 14.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:57.73 -02:03:06.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9525 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:26.35 +00:04:58.2: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3133 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:34.27 +00:03:50.9: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:34.27 +00:03:50.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8532 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:24:48.94 -02:26:40.6: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:48.94 -02:26:40.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7051 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:18:04.29 +02:38:24.3: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:04.29 +02:38:24.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9451 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:37:13.15 -06:22:52.7: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:43:41.50 +00:00:01.6: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:09.51 -01:14:01.3: 15.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:47.34 +02:05:17.4: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:11:48.94 +03:03:09.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:59:56.11 +00:01:59.2: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:43:52.62 -02:52:52.8: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:31:03.23 -06:00:39.6: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:37:13.15 -06:22:52.7: 14.33 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:43:41.50 +00:00:01.6: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:13.15 -06:22:52.7: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.0625 delta=-1.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:41.50 +00:00:01.6: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8167 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:09.51 -01:14:01.3: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:09.51 -01:14:01.3: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1081 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:47.34 +02:05:17.4: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:57:05.13 +02:55:35.2: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:59:56.11 +00:01:59.2: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:11:48.94 +03:03:09.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:47.34 +02:05:17.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3594 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:56.11 +00:01:59.2: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3737 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:43:52.62 -02:52:52.8: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:52.62 -02:52:52.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4813 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:31:03.23 -06:00:39.6: 15.13 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:03.23 -06:00:39.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4149 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:57:05.13 +02:55:35.2: 15.11 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:05.13 +02:55:35.2: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6605 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:43:04.95 +02:05:05.0: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:42:18.92 -01:41:56.4: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:44:57.67 -03:42:09.6: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:44:21.59 +01:05:52.0: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:32:39.72 -07:00:03.6: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:43:11.82 -00:44:47.2: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:06:20.81 -00:24:08.8: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:32:39.72 -07:00:03.6: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:44:57.67 -03:42:09.6: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:46:56.52 -02:03:06.3: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:39.72 -07:00:03.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4715 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:43:04.95 +02:05:05.0: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:57.67 -03:42:09.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4167 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:42:18.92 -01:41:56.4: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:04.95 +02:05:05.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5595 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:44:21.59 +01:05:52.0: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:18.92 -01:41:56.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4861 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:21.59 +01:05:52.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4447 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:43:11.82 -00:44:47.2: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:06:20.81 -00:24:08.8: 15.36 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:11.82 -00:44:47.2: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6457 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:46:56.52 -02:03:06.3: 14.91 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:20.81 -00:24:08.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5300 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:56.52 -02:03:06.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5170 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:18:37.59 +02:18:37.8: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:34:44.24 +00:47:34.9: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:02:35.85 +02:03:22.3: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:22:24.47 +01:38:50.2: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:34:44.24 +00:47:34.9: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:18:37.59 +02:18:37.8: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:02:35.85 +02:03:22.3: 15.36 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:22:24.47 +01:38:50.2: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:44.24 +00:47:34.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8205 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:35.85 +02:03:22.3: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6680 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:37.59 +02:18:37.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.7397 delta=-1.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:24.47 +01:38:50.2: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7306 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:41:52.49 -07:25:07.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:20.81 -05:16:08.7: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:41:56.18 -07:20:14.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:43:58.57 -07:20:12.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:44:57.15 -07:24:37.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:49.61 -07:22:05.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:26:35.06 -05:58:02.8: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:41:52.49 -07:25:07.7: 13.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:52.49 -07:25:07.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:20.81 -05:16:08.7: 13.90 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:20.81 -05:16:08.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4351 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:44:57.15 -07:24:37.4: 13.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:57.15 -07:24:37.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:43:58.57 -07:20:12.8: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:49.61 -07:22:05.5: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:49.61 -07:22:05.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:41:56.18 -07:20:14.6: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:58.57 -07:20:12.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:56.18 -07:20:14.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:26:35.06 -05:58:02.8: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:26:35.06 -05:58:02.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6306 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:44:23.09 -07:21:38.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:33.25 -07:10:25.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:44:23.09 -07:21:38.4: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:23.09 -07:21:38.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:33.25 -07:10:25.4: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:33.25 -07:10:25.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81585.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81826.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81365_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81365_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81375_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81375_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81378_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81378_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81379_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81379_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81474_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81474_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.17 -06:11:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81538_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81538_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:40.10 +01:12:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81585_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 81585_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81598_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81598_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81603_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81603_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:16.82 -01:59:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81635_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81635_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81674_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81674_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81710_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81710_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81714_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81714_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81720_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81720_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81815_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81815_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81826_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 81826_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81841_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81841_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81853_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81853_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81930_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81930_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81935_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81935_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81940_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81940_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81941_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81941_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81973_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81973_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81989_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 81989_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82010_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82010_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82017_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82017_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82033_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82033_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82075_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82075_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82082_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82082_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82085_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82085_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82105_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82105_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82184_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82184_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82215_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 82215_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57826_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 57826_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:52.69 +01:01:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22996_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 22996_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:28.20 -03:17:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06561_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 06561_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:25.46 -06:06:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03049_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 03049_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.21 -06:40:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78371_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78371_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07342_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 07342_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78094_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78094_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50997_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 50997_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.11 +02:10:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77902_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 77902_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77814_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 77814_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77564_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 77564_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77539_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 77539_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 77356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77314_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 77314_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36231_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 36231_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:37.24 -01:15:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65276_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 65276_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:08.14 -00:18:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11803_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 11803_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:39.98 -05:08:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08064_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 08064_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:42.82 -05:46:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 28181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-34-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks