This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2810 2461176.7810 12.43 14:49:54.60 +40:13:49.8
68.73700 62.27467 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 5150858
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.231 CV Y 0.990 CV 2453553.22360 0.595065600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 14:49:54.60 +40:13:49.8: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 14:49:54.60 +40:13:49.8: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 5150858,2461176.7810,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 5150858 20260516.2810 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2810 2461176.7810 9.73 15:17:14.71 +36:21:33.4
58.82444 57.86832 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" RT Boo
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.700 V 13.400 V 2459315.00000 276.500000000000 M6.5e-M8e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:17:14.71 +36:21:33.4: 10.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:17:14.71 +36:21:33.4: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.67 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RT Boo,2461176.7810,9.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RT Boo 20260516.2810 9.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.94407007 16.04.2026 10:39:17.654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
First image: 2461146.94407007 16.04.2026 10:39:17.654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Last image: 2461176.78119527 16.05.2026 06:44:45.271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8081
Objects passed selection criteria: 8078
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7769
Average stars matched: 7454 (95.9454 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 01:55:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.94407007 16.04.2026 10:39:17.654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
First image: 2461146.94407007 16.04.2026 10:39:17.654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Last image: 2461176.78119527 16.05.2026 06:44:45.271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 51
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40767
Objects passed selection criteria: 40672
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38883
Average stars matched: 37903.2 (97.4803 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141752 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 01:57:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.78072279
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:32.306 +37:58:43.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:25.253 +37:58:05.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:16:32.306 +37:58:43.54
Second-epoch image center 15:16:25.253 +37:58:05.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:22.804 +37:58:10.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:16:32.306 +37:58:43.54
Second-epoch image center 15:16:22.804 +37:58:10.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0325 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:16:25.253 +37:58:05.48
Second-epoch second image center 15:16:22.804 +37:58:10.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00818 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eiE14JbXI5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4BcmghV01Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nGYFtvXkgC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TfNIdXdOnn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7433 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.9181 to 240.1635 deg, Dec +31.8722 to +43.4385 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.9181 to 240.1635 deg, Dec 31.8722 to 43.4385 deg
Loaded 5463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3856 out of 4030 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4030 out of 7433 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.886750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.886750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7433 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.9181 to 240.1635 deg, Dec +31.8722 to +43.4385 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.9181 to 240.1635 deg, Dec 31.8722 to 43.4385 deg
Loaded 5463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3856 out of 4030 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4030 out of 7433 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7478 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.9194 to 240.1636 deg, Dec +31.8723 to +43.4385 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.9194 to 240.1636 deg, Dec 31.8723 to 43.4385 deg
Loaded 5463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3852 out of 4031 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4031 out of 7478 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.1 pix Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
3.1 pix fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
3.1 pix fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
15.5 mag. Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eiE14JbXI5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, passed=7433
Got 7433 stars (including 6963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7433 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=263 n_q2=242 n_q3=244 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -region wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4BcmghV01Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=471, passed=7471
Got 7471 stars (including 6988 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7471 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits N_match=982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=263 n_q2=241 n_q3=242 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -region wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nGYFtvXkgC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, passed=8193
Got 8193 stars (including 7855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=273 n_q2=236 n_q3=250 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TfNIdXdOnn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=8147
Got 8147 stars (including 7798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8147 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=268 n_q2=235 n_q3=252 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.108
ref2=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits sigma_overall=0.296 worst_q_ratio=1.087
new1=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.278 worst_q_ratio=1.093
reference average sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.0975
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365_astrometric_residuals.png (982 matched stars from wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132_astrometric_residuals.png (982 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:19:17.17 +38:48:15.5: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 14:49:54.63 +40:13:49.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:25:21.34 +39:35:58.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:25:21.24 +39:56:51.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:09:02.30 +36:11:33.5: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 14:49:54.63 +40:13:49.8: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:19:17.17 +38:48:15.5: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:49:54.63 +40:13:49.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4394 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:25:21.34 +39:35:58.8: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:25:21.24 +39:56:51.1: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:21.34 +39:35:58.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4146 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:17.17 +38:48:15.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5230 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:21.24 +39:56:51.1: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2299 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:09:02.30 +36:11:33.5: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:02.30 +36:11:33.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4838 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20421.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20417_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20419_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20421_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20421_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:49:54.63 +40:13:49.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.633 1488671437577394816 222.47777243443 +40.23036486325 13.0963 12.7421 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.633#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20422_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:21.70 +35:40:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20423_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20424_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04333_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 04333_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:53.36 +36:14:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:32.306 +37:58:43.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:25.253 +37:58:05.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:16:32.306 +37:58:43.54
Second-epoch image center 15:16:25.253 +37:58:05.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:22.804 +37:58:10.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:16:32.306 +37:58:43.54
Second-epoch image center 15:16:22.804 +37:58:10.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0325 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:16:25.253 +37:58:05.48
Second-epoch second image center 15:16:22.804 +37:58:10.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00818 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l1935iHHJm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P2FuH9L0zx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8RT6g3kCbo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lbvrXT0gG8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42547 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.9032 to 240.1787 deg, Dec +31.8722 to +43.4391 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.9032 to 240.1787 deg, Dec 31.8722 to 43.4391 deg
Loaded 5472 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3632 out of 4044 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4044 out of 42547 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.767400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.767400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42547 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.9032 to 240.1787 deg, Dec +31.8722 to +43.4391 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.9032 to 240.1787 deg, Dec 31.8722 to 43.4391 deg
Loaded 5472 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3632 out of 4044 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4044 out of 42547 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 42189 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.9032 to 240.1790 deg, Dec +31.8723 to +43.4405 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.9032 to 240.1790 deg, Dec 31.8723 to 43.4405 deg
Loaded 5473 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3633 out of 4040 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4040 out of 42189 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.0 pix Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
2.9 pix fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.9 pix fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
15.6 mag. Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.l1935iHHJm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1860, passed=42530
Got 42530 stars (including 40580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42530 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=255 n_q2=238 n_q3=248 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -region wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.P2FuH9L0zx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1841, passed=42179
Got 42179 stars (including 40254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42179 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=260 n_q2=233 n_q3=249 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -region wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8RT6g3kCbo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1319, passed=35906
Got 35906 stars (including 34535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35906 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=270 n_q2=229 n_q3=249 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lbvrXT0gG8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1316, passed=36041
Got 36041 stars (including 34675 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36041 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.228 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=265 n_q2=230 n_q3=249 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_014722_TTUQ1b1x1_151904_O4dCButO/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:02:46.81 +39:55:47.8: 15.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 14:44:27.07 +34:54:15.8: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:38:06.62 +38:00:21.4: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:22:20.34 +33:41:38.8: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:41:05.10 +38:16:02.9: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:35:40.96 +33:17:58.5: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:40:08.31 +36:29:24.2: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:29:25.28 +34:57:45.5: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:37:00.79 +32:36:01.5: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:02:46.81 +39:55:47.8: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:46.81 +39:55:47.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9624 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 14:44:27.07 +34:54:15.8: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:22:20.34 +33:41:38.8: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:27.07 +34:54:15.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8472 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:20.34 +33:41:38.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8674 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:29:25.28 +34:57:45.5: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:27:11.79 +35:56:34.2: 14.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:35:40.96 +33:17:58.5: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:25.28 +34:57:45.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2960 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:40.96 +33:17:58.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9662 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:41:05.10 +38:16:02.9: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:05.10 +38:16:02.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3529 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:40:08.31 +36:29:24.2: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:38:06.62 +38:00:21.4: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:08.31 +36:29:24.2: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3756 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:06.62 +38:00:21.4: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9759 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:37:00.79 +32:36:01.5: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:00.79 +32:36:01.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4041 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:27:11.79 +35:56:34.2: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:11.79 +35:56:34.2: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5335 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 14:49:40.12 +34:09:44.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:38:12.65 +37:07:54.7: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:49:23.54 +32:29:42.7: 15.72 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:24:47.01 +38:30:53.5: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:50:28.76 +32:53:34.5: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:12:27.16 +36:49:35.7: 14.94 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:41:02.55 +33:11:57.2: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:50:01.59 +33:30:21.6: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 14:49:40.12 +34:09:44.9: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:38:12.65 +37:07:54.7: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:40.12 +34:09:44.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6121 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:42:23.79 +32:29:25.1: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:12.65 +37:07:54.7: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5222 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 14:51:34.92 +33:02:33.1: 15.60 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:24:47.01 +38:30:53.5: 14.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:49:23.54 +32:29:42.7: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:47.01 +38:30:53.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6345 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:23.54 +32:29:42.7: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7535 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:50:28.76 +32:53:34.5: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:28.76 +32:53:34.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7125 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:12:27.16 +36:49:35.7: 14.79 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:27.16 +36:49:35.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8891 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:41:02.55 +33:11:57.2: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:02.55 +33:11:57.2: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9186 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:50:01.59 +33:30:21.6: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:01.59 +33:30:21.6: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8393 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:42:23.79 +32:29:25.1: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 14:51:34.92 +33:02:33.1: 15.66 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:23.79 +32:29:25.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7900 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:34.92 +33:02:33.1: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9709 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 14:53:10.95 +42:56:17.5: 15.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 14:41:53.13 +39:12:03.9: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:02:30.92 +36:45:31.9: 15.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 14:49:54.60 +40:13:49.8: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-39-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0364.fits at 15:17:14.71 +36:21:33.4: 10.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 14:41:53.13 +39:12:03.9: 14.97 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 14:53:10.95 +42:56:17.5: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:53.13 +39:12:03.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9518 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:10.95 +42:56:17.5: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9066 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:02:30.92 +36:45:31.9: 15.83 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 14:49:54.60 +40:13:49.8: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:02:30.92 +36:45:31.9: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3888 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:49:54.60 +40:13:49.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4190 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_05-40-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0365.fits at 15:17:14.71 +36:21:33.4: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:17:14.71 +36:21:33.4: ref_mag=10.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7317 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out34227.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13313.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41813.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52882_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52883_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52883_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52886_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52886_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52939_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52968_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52973_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52993_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:53.85 +34:36:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52995_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53001_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53001_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:20.23 +35:34:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53005_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53007_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53020_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53034_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53037_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:04.53 +33:04:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53041_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53046_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53053_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53053_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53060_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53063_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53067_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:16.14 +33:35:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53069_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53071_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53072_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53072_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53095_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53096_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53096_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53140_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53140_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34227_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 34227_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:30.92 +36:45:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.022 1294945666381185792 225.62886492940 +36.75857821757 15.3152 14.9552 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.022#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13313_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 13313_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20191_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20191_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:57.73 +37:58:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41813_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 41813_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25690_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 25690_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks