This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2363 2461176.7363 13.89 12:07:28.71 +31:35:18.8
185.33283 79.44148 galactic Com Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.350 Ornamenta -0 1 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:07:28.71 +31:35:18.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:07:28.71 +31:35:18.8: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.2363* 12 07 28.71 +31 35 18.8 13.9 U Com 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7363,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2363 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2363 2461176.7363 14.87 12:10:09.27 +29:49:43.3
193.93270 80.53881 galactic Com Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.679 Pax -0 0 1 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:10:09.27 +29:49:43.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:10:09.27 +29:49:43.3: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.2363* 12 10 09.27 +29 49 43.3 14.9 U Com 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7363,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2363 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.81175025 22.02.2026 07:28:45.222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
First image: 2461093.81175025 22.02.2026 07:28:45.222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Last image: 2461176.73647790 16.05.2026 05:40:21.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5928
Objects passed selection criteria: 5923
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5521.5
Average stars matched: 5356.25 (97.0072 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111624 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 00:59:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.81175025 22.02.2026 07:28:45.222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
First image: 2461093.81175025 22.02.2026 07:28:45.222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Last image: 2461176.73647790 16.05.2026 05:40:21.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 45
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29080
Objects passed selection criteria: 29002
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27228.5
Average stars matched: 26179 (96.1456 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 130324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 01:01:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.73604439
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits'
wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.753 +30:00:21.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.524 +30:00:10.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:01.753 +30:00:21.09
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.524 +30:00:10.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0053 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.475 +30:00:06.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:01.753 +30:00:21.09
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.475 +30:00:06.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.524 +30:00:10.48
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:02.475 +30:00:06.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00714 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FZTi92ucRy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bSQWOZTG0X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ouJdOOVlA0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.np0YgXt2Av
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.2957 to 189.2939 deg, Dec +24.2888 to +35.3606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.2957 to 189.2939 deg, Dec 24.2888 to 35.3606 deg
Loaded 3870 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2812 out of 2964 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2964 out of 5757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.905400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.905400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.2957 to 189.2939 deg, Dec +24.2888 to +35.3606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.2957 to 189.2939 deg, Dec 24.2888 to 35.3606 deg
Loaded 3870 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2812 out of 2964 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2964 out of 5757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5712 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.2957 to 189.2939 deg, Dec +24.2889 to +35.3609 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.2957 to 189.2939 deg, Dec 24.2889 to 35.3609 deg
Loaded 3870 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2817 out of 2965 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2965 out of 5712 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
2.3 pix UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
2.3 pix wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
2.3 pix wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FZTi92ucRy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=431, passed=5757
Got 5757 stars (including 5315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5757 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=252 n_q2=246 n_q3=233 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bSQWOZTG0X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, passed=5712
Got 5712 stars (including 5284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=253 n_q2=240 n_q3=234 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ouJdOOVlA0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=5374
Got 5374 stars (including 5040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.196 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=239 n_q2=231 n_q3=242 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.np0YgXt2Av (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=325, passed=5385
Got 5385 stars (including 5054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5385 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=240 n_q2=230 n_q3=242 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.184
ref2=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.220
new1=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.247
new2=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.041
reference average sigma_overall=0.4025 worst_q_ratio=1.202
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:17:00.35 +27:45:08.6: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:17:00.35 +27:45:08.6: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:00.35 +27:45:08.6: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5838 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 20381_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.753 +30:00:21.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.524 +30:00:10.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:01.753 +30:00:21.09
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.524 +30:00:10.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0053 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.475 +30:00:06.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:01.753 +30:00:21.09
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.475 +30:00:06.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.524 +30:00:10.48
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:02.475 +30:00:06.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00714 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OlKoX5uOrb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BdGoN72k6m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bmt3un4ShQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cn3rGyJaIa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28501 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.2672 to 189.2949 deg, Dec +24.2295 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.2672 to 189.2949 deg, Dec 24.2295 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 3901 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2711 out of 2980 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2980 out of 28501 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.811300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.811300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28501 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.2672 to 189.2949 deg, Dec +24.2295 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.2672 to 189.2949 deg, Dec 24.2295 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 3901 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2711 out of 2980 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2980 out of 28501 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 28642 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.2682 to 189.2939 deg, Dec +24.2296 to +35.3727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.2682 to 189.2939 deg, Dec 24.2296 to 35.3727 deg
Loaded 3904 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2697 out of 2980 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2980 out of 28642 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
2.1 pix UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
15.4 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
15.4 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OlKoX5uOrb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1244, passed=28486
Got 28486 stars (including 27184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=250 n_q2=240 n_q3=235 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BdGoN72k6m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1277, passed=28622
Got 28622 stars (including 27293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28622 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=253 n_q2=236 n_q3=237 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bmt3un4ShQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=912, passed=26270
Got 26270 stars (including 25323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26270 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.199 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=243 n_q2=236 n_q3=235 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cn3rGyJaIa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=908, passed=26297
Got 26297 stars (including 25353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=242 n_q2=235 n_q3=240 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-39-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_005322_TTUQ1b1x1_721700_lGEItvtF/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:16:52.70 +32:08:49.6: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 11:40:56.28 +31:02:58.3: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:09:16.99 +29:27:36.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:17:00.37 +27:45:08.5: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 11:41:01.98 +31:50:28.1: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:07:28.71 +31:35:18.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:00:09.94 +26:36:29.0: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:17:00.37 +27:45:08.5: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 11:40:56.28 +31:02:58.3: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:09:16.99 +29:27:36.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:16:52.70 +32:08:49.6: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:00.37 +27:45:08.5: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6765 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:40:56.28 +31:02:58.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.5082 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:16:52.70 +32:08:49.6: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7111 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:09:16.99 +29:27:36.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6256 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:00:09.94 +26:36:29.0: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 11:41:01.98 +31:50:28.1: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:09.94 +26:36:29.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3581 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:07:28.71 +31:35:18.8: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:41:01.98 +31:50:28.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1093 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 11:55:53.63 +28:24:58.6: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:16:03.03 +27:42:10.0: 14.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 11:25:40.08 +28:15:18.4: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 11:41:17.41 +26:04:03.2: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:06:46.55 +29:41:57.9: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:10:09.27 +29:49:43.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:21:41.87 +30:10:20.8: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 11:55:53.63 +28:24:58.6: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:53.63 +28:24:58.6: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3878 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:16:03.03 +27:42:10.0: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:16:03.03 +27:42:10.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5004 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:31:00.86 +31:36:38.3: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 12:00:18.27 +32:13:34.4: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 11:25:40.08 +28:15:18.4: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:40.08 +28:15:18.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5981 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:10:09.27 +29:49:43.3: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:06:46.55 +29:41:57.9: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 11:41:17.41 +26:04:03.2: 15.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:21:41.87 +30:10:20.8: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:46.55 +29:41:57.9: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9037 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:41:17.41 +26:04:03.2: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8159 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:41.87 +30:10:20.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8176 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:31:00.86 +31:36:38.3: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 12:00:18.27 +32:13:34.4: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:00.86 +31:36:38.3: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8796 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:18.27 +32:13:34.4: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7343 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-28-45_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0338.fits at 11:51:05.57 +28:13:09.0: 15.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits at 11:51:05.57 +28:13:09.0: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:51:05.57 +28:13:09.0: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9557 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32636.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33079.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32020_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32020_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32023_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32023_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:57:30.48 +32:20:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32027_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32027_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32141_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32141_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32275_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32275_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32341_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32341_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:03:09.59 +29:01:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32517_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32517_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:28:59.85 +25:53:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32521_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32521_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:32:55.40 +27:32:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32573_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32573_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:44:18.72 +29:54:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32592_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32592_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:48:02.89 +27:20:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32636_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
Preparing report for the candidate 32636_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32713_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32713_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32718_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32718_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:02.81 +32:15:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32801_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32801_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32817_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32817_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:59:31.85 +29:14:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32818_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32818_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:56:11.89 +28:50:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32828_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32828_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:03:30.60 +33:04:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32832_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32832_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:44.32 +29:19:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32868_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32868_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:30.18 +27:11:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32902_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32902_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32908_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32908_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32910_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32910_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:26:18.06 +34:08:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32945_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 32945_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33051_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 33051_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33059_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 33059_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33079_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
Preparing report for the candidate 33079_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33083_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 33083_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33184_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 33184_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33197_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 33197_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33221_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 33221_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17780_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056
The candidate 17780_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-40-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0056 did not pass the final checks