This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.4343 2461175.9343 12.73 15:25:24.80 +17:47:55.7
26.40951 53.38041 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.148 Gallia 1 -0 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:25:24.80 +17:47:55.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:25:24.80 +17:47:55.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 15.4344* 15 25 24.80 +17 47 55.7 12.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.9343,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.4343 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.4343 2461175.9343 14.35 14:59:07.09 +17:13:32.3
21.06543 58.93248 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.667 Denise 0 1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:59:07.09 +17:13:32.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:59:07.09 +17:13:32.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.9343,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.4343 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.96259111 21.03.2026 11:05:57.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
First image: 2461120.96259111 21.03.2026 11:05:57.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Last image: 2461175.93456023 15.05.2026 10:25:36.004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5853
Objects passed selection criteria: 5850
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5465.5
Average stars matched: 5367.75 (98.2115 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 05:31:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.96259111 21.03.2026 11:05:57.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
First image: 2461120.96259111 21.03.2026 11:05:57.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Last image: 2461175.93456023 15.05.2026 10:25:36.004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 94
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33525
Objects passed selection criteria: 33450
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30637.5
Average stars matched: 29808 (97.2925 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 05:33:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461175.93413377
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:41.481 +13:59:49.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92
Second-epoch image center 15:06:41.481 +13:59:49.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:40.902 +13:59:57.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92
Second-epoch image center 15:06:40.902 +13:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:41.481 +13:59:49.81
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:40.902 +13:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00316 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yNqn85nxJA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jc6A01gMvo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EnUvANNsZo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ybRK1dCByv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7821 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6200 to +19.2990 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6200 to 19.2990 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3688 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3688 out of 7821 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.933000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.933000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7821 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6200 to +19.2990 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6200 to 19.2990 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3688 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3688 out of 7821 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 7818 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5474 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6201 to +19.2992 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5474 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6201 to 19.2992 deg
Loaded 4353 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3530 out of 3691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3691 out of 7818 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
2.4 pix Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
2.4 pix fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.4 pix fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
15.4 mag. Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yNqn85nxJA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=509, passed=7821
Got 7821 stars (including 7307 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7821 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=244 n_q2=222 n_q3=235 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jc6A01gMvo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=497, passed=7818
Got 7818 stars (including 7317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7818 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=239 n_q2=225 n_q3=233 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EnUvANNsZo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5917
Got 5917 stars (including 5524 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5917 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=253 n_q2=212 n_q3=249 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.480
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ybRK1dCByv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=416, passed=5875
Got 5875 stars (including 5456 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.544 n_q1=253 n_q2=213 n_q3=247 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.525
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.145
ref2=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new1=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.480
new2=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.525
reference average sigma_overall=0.415 worst_q_ratio=1.1225
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:41.481 +13:59:49.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92
Second-epoch image center 15:06:41.481 +13:59:49.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:40.902 +13:59:57.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92
Second-epoch image center 15:06:40.902 +13:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:41.481 +13:59:49.81
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:40.902 +13:59:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00316 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GN6K0s01tW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A0AtI2irnm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ujj5so5GFA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.auV2Nkj1Vr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6024 to +19.3034 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6024 to 19.3034 deg
Loaded 4376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3281 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 43217 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.799700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.799700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6024 to +19.3034 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6024 to 19.3034 deg
Loaded 4376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3281 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 43217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 42714 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5042 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6022 to +19.3010 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5042 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6022 to 19.3010 deg
Loaded 4369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3312 out of 3700 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3700 out of 42714 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 57 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
2.2 pix Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
2.4 pix fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.4 pix fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
15.5 mag. Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GN6K0s01tW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2030, passed=43204
Got 43204 stars (including 41115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43204 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=244 n_q2=226 n_q3=226 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A0AtI2irnm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2000, passed=42700
Got 42700 stars (including 40642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42700 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=241 n_q2=226 n_q3=231 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ujj5so5GFA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1734, passed=30120
Got 30120 stars (including 28350 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30120 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=264 n_q2=199 n_q3=266 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.574
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.auV2Nkj1Vr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1890, passed=30417
Got 30417 stars (including 28488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30417 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.545 n_q1=262 n_q2=201 n_q3=267 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.566
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_052835_TTUQ2b1x1_1761764_l9YvUOAq/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:22:19.66 +13:18:48.8: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:25:24.80 +17:47:55.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:34:00.06 +12:15:28.5: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:22:19.66 +13:18:48.8: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:25:24.80 +17:47:55.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:19.66 +13:18:48.8: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4044 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:34:00.06 +12:15:28.5: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:00.06 +12:15:28.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0147 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:17:28.76 +10:30:11.4: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:34:43.20 +12:24:35.3: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:20:27.90 +10:41:29.8: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:17:28.76 +10:30:11.4: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:28.76 +10:30:11.4: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9343 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:34:43.20 +12:24:35.3: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:43.20 +12:24:35.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6386 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:28:27.06 +10:30:08.6: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:16:20.40 +09:56:01.9: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:20:27.90 +10:41:29.8: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:27.90 +10:41:29.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0359 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:23:14.72 +11:06:45.9: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:28:27.06 +10:30:08.6: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:16:20.40 +09:56:01.9: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:27.06 +10:30:08.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1239 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:20.40 +09:56:01.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0907 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:23:14.72 +11:06:45.9: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:25:30.50 +14:27:13.6: 14.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:14.72 +11:06:45.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2882 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:59:07.09 +17:13:32.3: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:29:18.42 +10:26:47.2: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:27:55.21 +11:56:18.7: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:25:30.50 +14:27:13.6: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:30.50 +14:27:13.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3755 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:59:07.09 +17:13:32.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:29:18.42 +10:26:47.2: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:18.42 +10:26:47.2: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6438 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:32:45.77 +13:13:49.5: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:27:55.21 +11:56:18.7: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:55.21 +11:56:18.7: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8207 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:32:45.77 +13:13:49.5: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:22:54.82 +10:50:07.2: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:45.77 +13:13:49.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8654 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:23:08.61 +13:29:47.3: 15.55 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:28:52.12 +10:52:51.2: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:33:31.42 +10:08:59.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:33:05.71 +10:32:15.5: 15.25 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:22:54.82 +10:50:07.2: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:54.82 +10:50:07.2: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8970 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:23:55.74 +14:18:16.8: 15.37 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:23:08.61 +13:29:47.3: 15.83 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:08.61 +13:29:47.3: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7919 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:28:52.12 +10:52:51.2: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:33:31.42 +10:08:59.7: 15.52 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:33:05.71 +10:32:15.5: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:52.12 +10:52:51.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7479 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:16:56.47 +11:27:21.9: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:05.71 +10:32:15.5: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8916 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:31.42 +10:08:59.7: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=14.8625 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:28:39.37 +13:54:00.7: 15.34 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:23:55.74 +14:18:16.8: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:55.74 +14:18:16.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9053 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:28:39.37 +13:54:00.7: 15.79 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:39.37 +13:54:00.7: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9109 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:16:56.47 +11:27:21.9: 15.57 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:56.47 +11:27:21.9: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9768 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:25:05.09 +15:30:41.3: 15.45 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:25:05.09 +15:30:41.3: 15.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:05.09 +15:30:41.3: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9013 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52709.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52454_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52454_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52458_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52458_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52459_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52462_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:15:36.94 +10:01:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52480_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52480_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52492_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52492_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52498_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52506_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:33.80 +11:55:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52518_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 52518_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52529_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:23.71 +12:10:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52531_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52555_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52555_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52558_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52577_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52579_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52591_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52605_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:27.77 +16:20:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52614_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52614_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52620_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52620_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:22:55.46 +13:22:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52635_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52636_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52639_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52639_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52643_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52652_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52665_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52665_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52669_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:29.22 +11:09:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52670_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52677_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:15:07.18 +14:07:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52687_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52703_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52703_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52704_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 52709_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52714_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52714_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52747_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52750_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52751_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52753_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52760_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52762_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52762_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52763_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52775_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52780_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52780_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52781_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52781_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52783_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52796_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52803_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52818_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52823_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52824_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52827_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52827_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52835_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52835_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52842_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52858_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52880_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52880_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52890_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52896_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10783_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 10783_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_05-25-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks