This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.4098 2461175.9098 13.04 00:26:48.48 +49:32:12.0
118.83293 -13.13896 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:26:48.48 +49:32:12.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:26:48.48 +49:32:12.0: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:26:48.48 +49:32:12.0: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 15.4098* 00 26 48.48 +49 32 12.0 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461175.9098,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260515.4098 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.4098 2461175.9098 12.22 00:20:53.02 +50:09:03.8
117.92850 -12.42363 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" Mis V1165
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.972 g Y 4.926 g 2451603.00000 : 320.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:20:53.02 +50:09:03.8: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:53.02 +50:09:03.8: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 15.4098* 00 20 53.02 +50 09 03.8 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Mis V1165,2461175.9098,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Mis V1165 20260515.4098 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.4098 2461175.9098 12.70 00:03:45.30 +57:02:57.2
116.45407 -5.22159 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J000345.27+570256.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.970 V 14.300 V 2458307.85570 60.674397400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:03:45.30 +57:02:57.2: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:03:45.30 +57:02:57.2: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 15.4098* 00 03 45.30 +57 02 57.2 12.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J000345.27+570256.5,2461175.9098,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J000345.27+570256.5 20260515.4098 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461175.91000265 15.05.2026 09:50:14.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27280
Objects passed selection criteria: 27169
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17648.5
Average stars matched: 17192.8 (97.4176 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 06:13:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461175.91000265 15.05.2026 09:50:14.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 50
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 59 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 188242
Objects passed selection criteria: 187675
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125286
Average stars matched: 118064 (94.2352 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1948696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 06:19:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461175.90956179
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:50.611 +54:00:44.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 23:59:50.611 +54:00:44.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.069 +54:00:51.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 23:59:52.069 +54:00:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:50.611 +54:00:44.96
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:52.069 +54:00:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00400 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jqqf0CaMyC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6t631ep0Qy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VG7Uflu1zN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rrn7ur6cnD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30002 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3704 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3704 deg
Loaded 163379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15843 out of 17844 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17844 out of 30002 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.951200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.951200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.99
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.99
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30002 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3704 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3704 deg
Loaded 163379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15843 out of 17844 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17844 out of 30002 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Jqqf0CaMyC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3597, passed=30002
Got 30002 stars (including 26372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5133 through 0 to 15.4425, gap 15.4425 to 345.5133
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5133 through 0 to 15.4430, gap 15.4430 to 345.5133
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=236 n_q2=265 n_q3=220 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6t631ep0Qy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3209, passed=29225
Got 29225 stars (including 25982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4494 through 0 to 15.3164, gap 15.3164 to 345.4494
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4490 through 0 to 15.3182, gap 15.3182 to 345.4490
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=194 n_q2=269 n_q3=218 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VG7Uflu1zN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, passed=6945
Got 6945 stars (including 6652 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6945 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.8413 through 0 to 14.8089, gap 14.8089 to 345.8413
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.8411 through 0 to 14.8094, gap 14.8094 to 345.8411
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=163 n_q2=444 n_q3=160 n_q4=185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rrn7ur6cnD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, passed=4846
Got 4846 stars (including 4640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4846 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.6534 through 0 to 14.5595, gap 14.5595 to 345.6534
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.6534 through 0 to 14.5600, gap 14.5600 to 345.6534
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=97 n_q2=493 n_q3=105 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.553 worst_q_ratio=1.220
ref2=Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.147
new1=fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.054
new2=fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.114
reference average sigma_overall=0.5285 worst_q_ratio=1.1835
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51810_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 51810_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:02.97 +55:12:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51811_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 51811_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:40.68 +55:32:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51814_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 51814_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:20.53 +51:21:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:50.611 +54:00:44.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 23:59:50.611 +54:00:44.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.069 +54:00:51.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 23:59:52.069 +54:00:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:50.611 +54:00:44.96
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:52.069 +54:00:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00400 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GKdPPf5IFJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.roSWmSzAIr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cRwvSUa9YY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Px1r8DZDi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 205184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3741 deg
Loaded 163418 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11964 out of 18942 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18942 out of 205184 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.784150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.784150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 205184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3741 deg
Loaded 163418 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11964 out of 18942 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18942 out of 205184 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GKdPPf5IFJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=77, blended=35015, passed=205107
Got 205107 stars (including 169770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 205107 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4449 through 0 to 15.4823, gap 15.4823 to 345.4449
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4447 through 0 to 15.4832, gap 15.4832 to 345.4447
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=241 n_q2=254 n_q3=229 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.roSWmSzAIr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=76, blended=32857, passed=217533
Got 217533 stars (including 184380 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4355 through 0 to 15.4567, gap 15.4567 to 345.4355
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4349 through 0 to 15.4584, gap 15.4584 to 345.4349
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=213 n_q2=263 n_q3=236 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cRwvSUa9YY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=4161, passed=46973
Got 46973 stars (including 42786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46973 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.6544 through 0 to 15.3365, gap 15.3365 to 345.6544
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.6541 through 0 to 15.3370, gap 15.3370 to 345.6541
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=159 n_q2=431 n_q3=163 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0Px1r8DZDi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2874, passed=34233
Got 34233 stars (including 31341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.3959 through 0 to 14.9067, gap 14.9067 to 345.3959
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.3959 through 0 to 14.9073, gap 14.9073 to 345.3959
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=97 n_q2=483 n_q3=109 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-49-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_045047_TTUQ1b1x1_776550_WdujaOSZ/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:26:48.48 +49:32:12.0: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:01:22.72 +56:07:53.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 23:53:48.96 +59:03:05.1: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:44:11.46 +48:12:23.0: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:07:40.80 +53:33:06.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:01:22.72 +56:07:53.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:53:48.96 +59:03:05.1: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:22.72 +56:07:53.0: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6596 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:26:48.48 +49:32:12.0: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:44:11.46 +48:12:23.0: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:26:48.48 +49:32:12.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0396 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:11.46 +48:12:23.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3473 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:53:48.96 +59:03:05.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0948 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:15:12.28 +52:38:20.9: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:07:40.80 +53:33:06.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:07:40.80 +53:33:06.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8226 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:19:58.83 +51:51:59.1: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:15:12.28 +52:38:20.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:12.28 +52:38:20.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9402 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:19:58.83 +51:51:59.1: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:58.83 +51:51:59.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1440 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:20:53.02 +50:09:03.8: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 00:03:45.30 +57:02:57.2: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:53.02 +50:09:03.8: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:20:53.02 +50:09:03.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2224 delta=1.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:03:45.30 +57:02:57.2: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:03:45.30 +57:02:57.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6954 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out179684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243835.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243815_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243815_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243833_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243833_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243835_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 243835_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243839_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243839_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:29.43 +56:31:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243842_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243842_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243852_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243852_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243855_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243855_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:02.96 +55:12:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243859_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243859_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243860_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243860_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:14:58.29 +53:15:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243868_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243868_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243872_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243872_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243883_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243883_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243894_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243894_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243896_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243896_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243904_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243904_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243911_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243911_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:16:59.53 +49:29:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243916_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243916_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243919_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243919_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243921_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243921_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:20:27.88 +49:12:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:23.10 +56:50:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243930_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243930_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:34.00 +57:16:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243942_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243942_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:08:37.33 +52:21:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243943_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243943_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243949_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243949_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:27.29 +54:33:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243962_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243962_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:20:10.28 +51:53:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243965_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243965_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:10:04.57 +50:47:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243970_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243970_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243973_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243973_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:08:30.39 +54:02:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243976_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 243976_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179684_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 179684_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40590_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 40590_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41118_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 41118_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:19.62 +57:02:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73098_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 73098_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:40.68 +55:32:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81544_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 81544_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:09:14.35 +55:08:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46081_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 46081_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:28.55 +56:45:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217597_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 217597_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:20.53 +51:21:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132896_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 132896_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:13:29.73 +52:36:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138140_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 138140_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:42.59 +52:27:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65467_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 65467_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:01:24.64 +55:55:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15065_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165
The candidate 15065_fd_Cas-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_04-50-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0165 did not pass the final checks