NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-11-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 15.28540    2461175.78540    14.45    12:18:32.81 +48:58:27.0   3086 1236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    14.45    12:18:32.62 +48:58:27.3   3091 1241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 15.2857  2461175.7857  14.45  12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2
136.98064  67.24707 galactic  CVn  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                            J-Ks=0.921+/-0.031 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2:  16.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2:  16.17 +/- 0.33  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  16.17 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMa-11-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-11-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-11-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-11-Q1b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 6113 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 6113 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits

renamed 'UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 430.8737 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 466.9058 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1037.4539 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 434.1545 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1035.2394 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 433.8611 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.40779 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-15T01:50:48.7860913' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-15T06:50:48.7860913' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61175.285286875 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-15T06:50:58.6902715' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61175.2854015045 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.996065039195 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998163013583 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 47.9936111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.21 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.3446750856442 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29445 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29445 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.6 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.101208 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-05-11.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-05-11.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits :) Spent 0.531795 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-15T01:51:44.9160283' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-15T06:51:44.9160283' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61175.2859365279 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-15T06:51:54.8204517' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61175.2860511574 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.996065101729 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998162691625 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 47.8247222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.2225 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.34824847762371 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29445 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29445 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.6 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.101208 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-05-11.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-05-11.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits :) Spent 0.503679 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits


fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461175.78540262 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:08.500 +45:59:59.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.500 +45:59:59.06 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0253 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:11.274 +46:00:28.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.274 +46:00:28.07 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0348 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:08.500 +45:59:59.06 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:11.274 +46:00:28.07 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01137 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nHieRdtIt0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Shbovw0xP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JvofkElIfD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.boSGegG2a6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2476 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2476 deg Loaded 3765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2801 out of 2905 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6666 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.954000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.954000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2476 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2476 deg Loaded 3765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2801 out of 2905 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6666 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 6678 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9174 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2477 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9174 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2477 deg Loaded 3764 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2798 out of 2905 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6678 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.4 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 3.4 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 3.3 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.nHieRdtIt0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=6666 Got 6666 stars (including 6308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=258 n_q2=245 n_q3=248 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.1Shbovw0xP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, passed=6678 Got 6678 stars (including 6317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6678 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6639 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=252 n_q2=249 n_q3=249 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.JvofkElIfD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, passed=5288 Got 5288 stars (including 5087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5288 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5206 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5206 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5206 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.194 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=208 n_q2=271 n_q3=230 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.boSGegG2a6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=194, passed=5308 Got 5308 stars (including 5113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5308 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5224 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.222 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.184 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=237 n_q2=246 n_q3=252 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.173 ref2=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.230 new1=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.240 worst_q_ratio=1.081 new2=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits sigma_overall=0.222 worst_q_ratio=1.219 reference average sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.2015 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:44:46.16 +47:31:21.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:20:05.27 +49:00:02.3: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 11:44:46.16 +47:31:21.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:20:05.27 +49:00:02.3: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:44:46.16 +47:31:21.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4960 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:05.27 +49:00:02.3: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1887 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20293_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 20293_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 15.28540    2461175.78540    12.50    11:44:46.19 +47:31:21.5   6409 2339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    12.50    11:44:46.13 +47:31:21.9   6414 2344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20294_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 20294_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    12.07    12:27:13.53 +40:26:05.4   1468 6246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:27:13.54 +40:26:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20335_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 20335_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    11.88    11:30:23.04 +47:24:49.4   7888 2394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:30:22.97 +47:24:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20356_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 20356_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 15.28540    2461175.78540    12.18    12:20:05.13 +49:00:01.7   2937 1200   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    12.19    12:20:05.41 +49:00:02.9   2940 1206   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:08.500 +45:59:59.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.500 +45:59:59.06 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0253 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:11.274 +46:00:28.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.274 +46:00:28.07 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0348 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:08.500 +45:59:59.06 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:11.274 +46:00:28.07 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01137 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4QCL6Z2aXl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fbBdvuiklZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RUEVGK3zSD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P993Bm84kS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 29946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2778 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2778 deg Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2686 out of 2907 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2907 out of 29946 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 29946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2778 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2778 deg Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2686 out of 2907 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2907 out of 29946 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=5.3) Read 30011 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8350 to 192.4261 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2775 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8350 to 192.4261 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2775 deg Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2687 out of 2905 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 30011 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=5.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.2 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 3.2 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 3.2 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 2.3 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4QCL6Z2aXl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1201, passed=29928 Got 29928 stars (including 28681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29928 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29770 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=261 n_q2=250 n_q3=237 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.fbBdvuiklZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1184, passed=29994 Got 29994 stars (including 28767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29994 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29827 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29828 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29828 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=259 n_q2=256 n_q3=237 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.RUEVGK3zSD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=605, passed=21309 Got 21309 stars (including 20677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21309 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.209 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=208 n_q2=262 n_q3=230 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.P993Bm84kS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=580, passed=21416 Got 21416 stars (including 20818 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21416 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21099 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.222 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.174 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.216 n_q1=234 n_q2=236 n_q3=255 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:24:19.91 +45:34:36.6: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:38:53.43 +40:43:24.6: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 11:24:19.91 +45:34:36.6: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:24:19.91 +45:34:36.6: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3072 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2: 16.17 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 11:34:10.82 +49:40:21.9: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.17 +/- 0.33 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2: ref_mag=16.17 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=14.4521 delta=1.72 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:38:53.43 +40:43:24.6: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:38:53.43 +40:43:24.6: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7284 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 11:34:10.82 +49:40:21.9: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:10.82 +49:40:21.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3190 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32424.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31980_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 31980_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.54    11:22:14.45 +50:29:54.9   8625 0479   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:22:14.45 +50:29:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31981_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 31981_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.01    12:37:41.24 +42:53:22.7   0534 4582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:37:41.22 +42:53:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31982_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 31982_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    12.11    12:27:13.54 +40:26:05.5   1468 6246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:27:13.52 +40:26:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32012_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32012_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    11.54    11:17:40.22 +50:55:56.3   9053 0180   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:17:40.24 +50:55:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32024_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32024_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    11.79    11:30:23.05 +47:24:49.4   7888 2394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:30:22.97 +47:24:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32083_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32083_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    12.59    11:20:39.47 +45:00:34.4   8983 3803   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:20:39.54 +45:00:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32137_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32137_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.27    12:33:34.22 +44:04:43.9   1112 3945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:33:34.22 +44:04:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32144_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32144_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 15.28540    2461175.78540    13.28    11:24:19.92 +45:34:37.6   8563 3475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.38    11:24:19.90 +45:34:35.6   8568 3480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32190_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32190_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.52    12:46:27.66 +47:22:16.2   0129 1723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:46:27.72 +47:22:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32200_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32200_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.67    11:28:58.41 +48:14:40.3   8015 1886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:28:58.40 +48:14:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32203_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32203_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.75    12:38:37.35 +40:52:19.1   0201 5778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:38:37.40 +40:52:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32217_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32217_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.68    11:37:19.98 +46:07:35.0   7180 3187   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:37:20.04 +46:07:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32236_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32236_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.70    11:32:00.96 +45:54:25.4   7743 3310   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:32:01.10 +45:54:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32250_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32250_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.99    12:43:05.09 +48:24:33.3   0599 1175   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:43:05.19 +48:24:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32271_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32271_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.81    11:22:11.43 +46:48:43.3   8755 2719   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 11:22:11.43 +46:48:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32309_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 32309_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.91    12:21:43.63 +40:42:02.3   2123 6167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:21:43.62 +40:42:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32424_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 Preparing report for the candidate 32424_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00768_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 00768_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.75    12:34:19.58 +40:32:35.5   0660 6059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits **** FOUND 12:34:19.58 +40:32:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01554_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 01554_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 15.28540    2461175.78540    13.71    12:38:53.37 +40:43:24.4   0148 5857   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.73    12:38:53.48 +40:43:24.8   0153 5863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23813_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 The candidate 23813_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 15.28540    2461175.78540    13.36    11:34:10.85 +49:40:21.6   7468 1032   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-50-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 15.28605    2461175.78605    13.27    11:34:10.79 +49:40:22.1   7472 1036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_015237_TTUQ1b1x1_3769598_OPDW7qNf/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_01-51-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2 ########### Completed UMa-11-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2 ################################################################################### 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 12:18:32.71 +48:58:27.2 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461175.78540262 -observatory V36 03:30:02.70 +19:15:26.8 Mercury (-2.4mag) 05:38:31.85 +24:48:56.9 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:40:53.82 +09:37:55.5 Mars (1.2mag) 07:29:54.81 +22:13:58.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:41:22.71 +02:03:05.8 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:54:25.17 +20:08:23.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:14:14.80 +00:05:42.2 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:11.75 -22:56:59.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 01:55:44.66 +15:29:23.1 Moon (-8.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 15 01:54 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461175.78540262: 07:29:55.64 +22:13:54.0 Io (5.9mag) 07:30:06.95 +22:13:27.0 Europa (6.1mag) 07:30:05.84 +22:13:25.4 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:29:52.87 +22:14:11.2 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:31:39.90 +21:51:46.7 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:29:52.17 +22:14:06.4 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:32:06.96 +22:17:23.5 Elara (17.4mag) 07:30:43.30 +22:38:33.8 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:37:25.49 +22:14:08.3 Carme (18.7mag) 00:41:33.19 +02:03:16.2 Titan (8.7mag) 00:41:27.53 +02:03:13.0 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:41:20.18 +02:01:29.2 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:41:12.49 +02:03:06.2 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:42:32.33 +02:08:21.4 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 15 01:54 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461175.78540262: 17:04:42.59 -30:33:56.0 JWST 13:33:03.32 +57:19:24.8 Chandra 19:02:38.08 -10:53:23.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 15 01:54 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461175.78540262 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 13:31:52.91 -28:07:36.5 14.6mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:18:46.63 +30:53:44.8 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:36:17.76 +00:43:34.2 14.8mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:10:45.38 +24:11:59.8 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 08:11:26.68 +23:24:33.3 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:54:46.31 -30:48:04.1 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:30:46.53 -68:32:12.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:40:37.72 +31:41:20.6 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:23:46.73 +13:39:37.5 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:46.86 +30:32:37.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:04:33.31 +26:41:55.2 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:14:38.00 +31:45:43.7 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:39:18.91 +02:28:50.7 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:42:26.61 +20:39:48.4 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:29:05.33 -11:07:34.9 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:58.36 -07:50:13.5 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:14:05.88 +64:52:48.9 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:39:26.41 -04:47:02.4 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 15:01:01.83 +87:43:17.2 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:40:59.43 +63:41:56.5 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:08:46.29 +25:00:00.0 12.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:57:00.89 +10:51:06.1 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:22:47.78 +23:49:02.3 14.3mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:54:09.28 -18:25:06.4 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:43:20.61 +38:52:44.0 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:03:17.07 +53:20:53.6 16.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 05:54:29.17 -08:50:46.9 11.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:43:20.07 +04:22:31.2 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:13:21.17 +41:19:41.8 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:12:55.78 -14:27:50.8 16.1mag A/2026 E1 19:39:13.22 -08:17:20.8 10.1mag 10P/Tempel 14:25:37.12 -00:49:03.0 16.7mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:00.79 -00:54:15.2 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:44:54.55 -02:39:19.9 17.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:34:23.65 +22:13:17.9 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:09:13.64 +30:12:00.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:03:37.61 -08:17:01.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:27:36.87 +29:34:33.7 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:12:15.23 +13:38:18.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:24:21.98 -00:59:35.0 15.1mag 88P/Howell 03:38:11.25 +27:15:10.6 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:55:18.43 +33:18:04.2 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:10:06.45 +25:04:22.1 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:19:47.50 +17:21:18.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:45:44.25 +17:31:35.5 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 04:03:39.55 +19:27:45.9 11.8mag 141P/Machholz 04:07:21.77 +14:17:49.2 11.7mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:48:23.47 +10:44:27.9 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:39:57.81 -28:30:46.8 17.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:26:36.53 +13:07:19.5 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:10:01.46 -10:25:14.8 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 06:40:05.46 +35:54:23.8 17.2mag 240P/NEAT 07:57:18.79 -02:38:46.4 18.0mag 242P/Spahr 23:30:40.55 -11:50:25.0 17.0mag 260P/McNaught 03:03:04.08 +27:32:08.7 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR 15:27:48.84 +08:17:35.8 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:49:41.49 +21:12:51.0 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:21:08.00 +43:17:11.8 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 15 01:54 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 15 01:54 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 15 01:54 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 13:53:54.310 +04:00:01.41 AT 2026lyj 2026-05-08.65 21.94 13:20:40.330 -01:03:09.00 AT 2026lyi 2026-05-08.62 21.64 14:23:47.600 +02:29:52.13 AT 2026lyh 2026-05-07.73 22.27 13:32:07.790 -00:53:14.26 AT 2026lyg 2026-05-07.63 21.54 11:08:52.320 +05:28:37.82 AT 2026lyf 2026-05-07.60 20.75 13:38:09.140 +05:25:57.10 AT 2026lye 2026-05-03.69 21.63 14:26:28.620 -01:34:58.52 AT 2026lyd 2026-05-03.65 21.66 13:34:21.330 +03:12:50.41 AT 2026lyc 2026-05-03.63 21.35 10:47:16.760 +02:02:04.54 AT 2026lyb 2026-05-03.61 22.1 10:21:54.040 +03:41:59.33 AT 2026lya 2026-05-03.60 21.13 11:06:11.440 -00:33:35.21 AT 2026lxz 2026-05-03.60 21.33 10:58:56.840 -01:58:51.50 AT 2026lxy 2026-05-03.59 21.84 10:51:09.260 -00:54:46.17 AT 2026lxx 2026-05-03.59 22.04 10:34:52.070 +02:39:15.54 AT 2026lxw 2026-05-03.59 21.74 11:18:28.780 -01:07:33.99 AT 2026lxv 2026-05-02.60 21.31 10:15:24.440 +02:57:45.98 AT 2026lxu 2026-05-02.59 21.1 13:47:52.360 +01:54:39.00 AT 2026lxt 2026-04-28.70 21.13 13:54:30.310 -01:39:59.25 AT 2026lxs 2026-04-26.75 21.67 13:47:51.810 -01:22:49.76 AT 2026lxr 2026-04-26.74 21.94 10:26:20.740 -01:33:56.81 AT 2026lxq 2026-04-24.58 21.83 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 15 01:54 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C