This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2781 2461174.7781 12.79 21:31:37.23 +58:22:21.3
99.16588 5.04759 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" ZTF J213136.45+582222.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.707 g Y 0.121 g 2458608.68060 28.933659900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:31:37.23 +58:22:21.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:31:37.23 +58:22:21.3: 13.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J213136.45+582222.1,2461174.7781,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J213136.45+582222.1 20260514.2781 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2781 2461174.7781 12.90 22:46:58.21 +65:00:14.8
110.26482 5.23948 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2211502407589002112 | 22:46:58.60 +65:00:17.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:46:58.21 +65:00:14.8: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:46:58.21 +65:00:14.8: 13.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2211502407589002112,2461174.7781,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2211502407589002112 20260514.2781 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2781 2461174.7781 11.34 22:50:12.62 +58:49:37.3
107.78965 -0.43410 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" OP Cep
Type: LB:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 V 13.400 V C(N)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:50:12.62 +58:49:37.3: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:50:12.62 +58:49:37.3: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
OP Cep,2461174.7781,11.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
OP Cep 20260514.2781 11.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2781 2461174.7781 12.97 21:44:09.14 +59:59:19.6
101.44860 5.17784 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 21:44:09.14 +59:59:19.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:44:09.14 +59:59:19.6: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:44:09.14 +59:59:19.6: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461174.7781,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260514.2781 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2781 2461174.7781 12.06 22:46:15.44 +57:39:05.5
106.79078 -1.24329 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ZTF J224616.01+573903.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.618 g Y 0.238 g 2458429.70990 48.154467200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:46:15.44 +57:39:05.5: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:46:15.44 +57:39:05.5: 13.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J224616.01+573903.3,2461174.7781,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J224616.01+573903.3 20260514.2781 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2781 2461174.7781 13.02 21:42:40.10 +59:27:37.2
100.95980 4.90007 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 2203412201037415424
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.070 G 14.090 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:42:40.10 +59:27:37.2: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:42:40.10 +59:27:37.2: 13.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2203412201037415424,2461174.7781,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2203412201037415424 20260514.2781 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2781 2461174.7781 12.31 22:45:34.04 +64:14:39.0
109.77726 4.63603 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J224534.15+641441.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.770 V 13.970 V 2457513.00000 366.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:45:34.04 +64:14:39.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:45:34.04 +64:14:39.0: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J224534.15+641441.3,2461174.7781,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J224534.15+641441.3 20260514.2781 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.62570392 23.12.2025 03:00:50.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
First image: 2461032.62570392 23.12.2025 03:00:50.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Last image: 2461174.77842819 14.05.2026 06:40:46.196 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10279
Objects passed selection criteria: 10264
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11086
Average stars matched: 10195.8 (91.9696 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 02:00:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.62570392 23.12.2025 03:00:50.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
First image: 2461032.62570392 23.12.2025 03:00:50.819 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Last image: 2461174.77842819 14.05.2026 06:40:46.196 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 135
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 89666
Objects passed selection criteria: 89504
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86411.2
Average stars matched: 79859.2 (92.4177 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1956040 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 02:02:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461174.77786926
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits'
wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:05.936 +62:00:12.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42
Second-epoch image center 22:17:05.936 +62:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0184 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:08.035 +61:59:42.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42
Second-epoch image center 22:17:08.035 +61:59:42.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:17:05.936 +62:00:12.97
Second-epoch second image center 22:17:08.035 +61:59:42.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00940 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cxLzOLM0Yk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hq3mDqUrMK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sqR1OMmqdK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NzmAh0CB5S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.7073 to 354.1451 deg, Dec +55.3424 to +67.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.7073 to 354.1451 deg, Dec 55.3424 to 67.4078 deg
Loaded 22030 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12349 out of 13829 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13829 out of 26505 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.942700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.942700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.7073 to 354.1451 deg, Dec +55.3424 to +67.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.7073 to 354.1451 deg, Dec 55.3424 to 67.4078 deg
Loaded 22030 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12349 out of 13829 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13829 out of 26505 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 13833 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.3774 to 354.0209 deg, Dec +55.5200 to +67.3681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.3774 to 354.0209 deg, Dec 55.5200 to 67.3681 deg
Loaded 21406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9846 out of 10295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10295 out of 13833 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
2.2 pix Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
14.4 mag. Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cxLzOLM0Yk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3069, passed=26505
Got 26505 stars (including 23407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=174 n_q2=263 n_q3=248 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Hq3mDqUrMK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1104, passed=13833
Got 13833 stars (including 12711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=256 n_q2=218 n_q3=273 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sqR1OMmqdK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, passed=7275
Got 7275 stars (including 6911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7275 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.709 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.736 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.744 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.851 n_q1=237 n_q2=129 n_q3=349 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NzmAh0CB5S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, passed=7786
Got 7786 stars (including 7359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7786 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.722 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.895 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.880 n_q1=241 n_q2=136 n_q3=322 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.136
ref2=Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.432 worst_q_ratio=1.030
new1=fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.709 worst_q_ratio=1.200
new2=fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.722 worst_q_ratio=1.240
reference average sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.083
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:31:00.83 +58:39:14.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:31:00.83 +58:39:14.7: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:00.83 +58:39:14.7: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0587 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33224_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 33224_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:29:09.38 +58:24:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33084_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 33084_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:05.936 +62:00:12.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42
Second-epoch image center 22:17:05.936 +62:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0184 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:17:08.035 +61:59:42.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:13.968 +61:59:38.42
Second-epoch image center 22:17:08.035 +61:59:42.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:17:05.936 +62:00:12.97
Second-epoch second image center 22:17:08.035 +61:59:42.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00940 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9HdKoagAiI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RBlt4T1CRL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VaQmNxDJQ6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WsQgqU8hF5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 188195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.5210 to 354.3390 deg, Dec +55.2961 to +67.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.5210 to 354.3390 deg, Dec 55.2961 to 67.4232 deg
Loaded 22379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9775 out of 14307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14307 out of 188195 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.813300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.813300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 188195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.5210 to 354.3390 deg, Dec +55.2961 to +67.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.5210 to 354.3390 deg, Dec 55.2961 to 67.4232 deg
Loaded 22379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9775 out of 14307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14307 out of 188195 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 116103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.2238 to 354.1808 deg, Dec +55.4894 to +67.3777 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.2238 to 354.1808 deg, Dec 55.4894 to 67.3777 deg
Loaded 21668 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11797 out of 14186 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14186 out of 116103 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
2.0 pix Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
14.6 mag. Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9HdKoagAiI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=27430, passed=188152
Got 188152 stars (including 160411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188152 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 180215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 180218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 180218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=194 n_q2=269 n_q3=228 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RBlt4T1CRL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=10079, passed=116070
Got 116070 stars (including 105773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116070 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 114577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=264 n_q2=221 n_q3=252 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VaQmNxDJQ6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3086, passed=51155
Got 51155 stars (including 48008 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.678 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.769 n_q1=243 n_q2=120 n_q3=354 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WsQgqU8hF5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3519, passed=56766
Got 56766 stars (including 53167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.716 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.849 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.821 n_q1=247 n_q2=124 n_q3=331 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-39-57_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_015456_TTUQ2b1x1_3201130_FD8SShl7/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:52:38.42 +62:45:52.0: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:50:55.02 +63:39:47.6: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:45:36.25 +64:54:09.0: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:54:13.88 +62:13:27.0: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:43:26.46 +65:23:12.2: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:45:36.25 +64:54:09.0: 13.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:52:38.42 +62:45:52.0: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:45:36.25 +64:54:09.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3052 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:38.42 +62:45:52.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8293 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:43:26.46 +65:23:12.2: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:50:55.02 +63:39:47.6: 13.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:54:13.88 +62:13:27.0: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:55.02 +63:39:47.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4127 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:43:26.46 +65:23:12.2: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9454 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:13.88 +62:13:27.0: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0143 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:44:03.00 +63:16:56.3: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:54:56.38 +62:01:22.4: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:44:03.00 +63:16:56.3: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:44:03.00 +63:16:56.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9394 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:54:56.38 +62:01:22.4: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:56.38 +62:01:22.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8503 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:39:32.44 +58:47:33.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:31:31.62 +58:22:38.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:34:49.65 +59:09:57.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:29:55.84 +57:36:57.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:30:57.00 +57:50:23.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:39:19.39 +59:12:48.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:39:32.44 +58:47:33.7: 13.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:32.44 +58:47:33.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9782 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:31:31.62 +58:22:38.2: 13.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:34:49.65 +59:09:57.1: 13.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:31.62 +58:22:38.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.6169 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:34:49.65 +59:09:57.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.0034 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:29:55.84 +57:36:57.3: 13.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:39:30.04 +58:05:09.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:30:57.00 +57:50:23.6: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:55.84 +57:36:57.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.7072 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:30:57.00 +57:50:23.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.7845 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:39:19.39 +59:12:48.1: 13.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:19.39 +59:12:48.1: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8685 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:22:16.23 +65:01:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:32:25.41 +57:54:02.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:39:30.04 +58:05:09.3: 13.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:30.04 +58:05:09.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8510 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:22:16.23 +65:01:14.5: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:16.23 +65:01:14.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8858 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:32:25.41 +57:54:02.7: 13.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:31:37.23 +58:22:21.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:25.41 +57:54:02.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.8378 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:37:24.35 +58:34:45.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:31:56.72 +58:40:56.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:37:47.76 +57:57:39.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:32:43.52 +57:49:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:31:37.23 +58:22:21.3: 13.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:31:37.23 +58:22:21.3: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.7796 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:37:24.35 +58:34:45.9: 13.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:31:56.72 +58:40:56.4: 13.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:24.35 +58:34:45.9: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.6040 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:56.72 +58:40:56.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.7441 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:32:43.52 +57:49:06.0: 13.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:37:47.76 +57:57:39.7: 13.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:43.52 +57:49:06.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.6996 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:47.76 +57:57:39.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.6021 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:29:59.43 +59:15:48.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:46:58.21 +65:00:14.8: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:34:53.60 +58:39:21.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:38:43.86 +59:25:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:29:59.43 +59:15:48.3: 13.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:59.43 +59:15:48.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.7158 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:46:58.21 +65:00:14.8: 13.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:34:53.60 +58:39:21.4: 13.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:46:58.21 +65:00:14.8: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9018 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:34:53.60 +58:39:21.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.6247 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:31:37.93 +58:01:30.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:38:43.86 +59:25:34.6: 13.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:43.86 +59:25:34.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.6432 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:29:33.24 +57:53:43.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:34:14.09 +58:53:02.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:50:12.62 +58:49:37.3: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:31:37.93 +58:01:30.4: 13.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:37.93 +58:01:30.4: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.5590 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:34:14.09 +58:53:02.7: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:29:33.24 +57:53:43.6: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:34:14.09 +58:53:02.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.6699 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:33.24 +57:53:43.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4850 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:50:12.62 +58:49:37.3: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:50:12.62 +58:49:37.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3347 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:34:40.93 +58:55:47.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:27:23.89 +57:45:54.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:34:40.93 +58:55:47.4: 13.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:30:40.76 +58:05:08.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:34:40.93 +58:55:47.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.3991 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:44:09.14 +59:59:19.6: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:41:59.50 +65:20:55.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:27:23.89 +57:45:54.0: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:23.89 +57:45:54.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.3867 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:30:40.76 +58:05:08.8: 13.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:44:09.14 +59:59:19.6: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:41:59.50 +65:20:55.1: 13.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:30:40.76 +58:05:08.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.0140 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:44:09.14 +59:59:19.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9297 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:59.50 +65:20:55.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2590 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:46:15.44 +57:39:05.5: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:50:45.58 +58:01:45.3: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:46:15.44 +57:39:05.5: 13.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:46:15.44 +57:39:05.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0117 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:32:38.22 +58:05:08.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:50:45.58 +58:01:45.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:50:45.58 +58:01:45.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0770 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:32:38.22 +58:05:08.7: 13.85 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:38.22 +58:05:08.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0065 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:49:48.68 +57:59:46.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:38:01.35 +58:34:46.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:49:48.68 +57:59:46.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:49:48.68 +57:59:46.6: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5785 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:44:18.63 +58:03:37.9: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:38:01.35 +58:34:46.7: 13.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:38:01.35 +58:34:46.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=12.9373 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:42:40.10 +59:27:37.2: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:44:18.63 +58:03:37.9: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:44:18.63 +58:03:37.9: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3606 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:42:40.10 +59:27:37.2: 13.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:42:40.10 +59:27:37.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0164 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 22:45:34.04 +64:14:39.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 22:45:34.04 +64:14:39.0: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:45:34.04 +64:14:39.0: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2689 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:30:46.40 +58:12:23.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:39:40.53 +57:57:13.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-00-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0082.fits at 21:37:55.21 +59:10:11.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:30:46.40 +58:12:23.8: 13.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:30:46.40 +58:12:23.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.8678 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:39:40.53 +57:57:13.2: 13.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:40.53 +57:57:13.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9188 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_03-02-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0211.fits at 21:37:55.21 +59:10:11.7: 13.75 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:55.21 +59:10:11.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9778 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out145338.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146622.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out214296.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out215210.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out215913.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120668.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out126838.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130844.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out140356.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out211307.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23407.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220924_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220924_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220934_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220934_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220949_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220949_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220950_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220950_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:59.13 +63:10:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220966_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220966_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220969_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220969_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220970_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220970_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:51.12 +61:08:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220972_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220972_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:45:43.50 +64:21:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220992_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 220992_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:29:09.37 +58:24:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221348_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 221348_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:53:40.54 +62:35:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221471_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 221471_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:39:32.78 +62:23:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221756_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 221756_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:18:10.72 +62:46:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221788_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 221788_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:53:52.68 +62:38:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221864_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 221864_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:49:23.56 +62:41:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221960_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 221960_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:46.34 +61:55:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222073_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222073_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:44:39.76 +58:12:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222083_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222083_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222213_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222213_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:33:45.80 +61:47:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222215_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222215_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:51:45.08 +61:57:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222246_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222246_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:12:12.19 +63:43:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222260_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222260_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:47:24.61 +60:58:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222282_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222282_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222297_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222297_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:47:43.44 +65:04:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222317_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222317_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:59:53.64 +65:54:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222338_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222338_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:26:52.40 +65:28:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222344_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222344_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:45:51.61 +62:17:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222389_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222389_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:42:19.54 +63:22:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222622_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222622_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:25.62 +64:10:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222664_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222664_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:04:32.35 +61:22:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222685_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222685_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:22:00.10 +63:09:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222933_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 222933_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:42:03.63 +65:20:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214402_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 214402_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215913_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 215913_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:34:49.65 +59:09:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.669 2179608633289845376 323.70696718763 +59.16604095450 13.3400 12.2234 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.669#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210322_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 210322_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211317_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 211317_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212207_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 212207_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133507_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133507_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:40:59.63 +58:44:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212228_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 212228_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184260_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 184260_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:37:53.40 +57:53:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211819_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 211819_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211665_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 211665_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211657_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 211657_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149879_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 149879_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:47:26.10 +58:18:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211307_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 211307_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211253_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 211253_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211031_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 211031_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141000_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 141000_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:18.98 +57:39:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210785_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 210785_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210774_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 210774_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29133_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 29133_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:14.17 +64:30:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23407_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 23407_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210318_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 210318_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209895_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 209895_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209880_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 209880_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217732_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 217732_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:25:22.68 +62:21:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209283_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 209283_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126838_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 126838_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209145_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 209145_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209108_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 209108_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127982_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 127982_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:40:06.46 +59:35:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17131_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 17131_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:50:47.32 +65:21:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46680_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 46680_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:55:28.92 +63:12:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15596_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 15596_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208288_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 208288_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143183_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 143183_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:33:45.63 +58:16:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120668_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 120668_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21494_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 21494_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:44:42.59 +65:11:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207840_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 207840_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27550_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 27550_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215210_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 215210_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:30:40.76 +58:05:08.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.594 2179268025206428672 322.66995139310 +58.08593045642 13.7355 13.0177 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.594#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140356_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 140356_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133519_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133519_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:49:57.74 +58:27:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146622_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 146622_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:50:45.58 +58:01:45.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.401 2007381127614631040 342.69215513759 +58.02895058434 11.7253 10.3102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.401#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214554_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 214554_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148148_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 148148_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:41:42.66 +58:21:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127181_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 127181_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:45:43.80 +58:57:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214407_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 214407_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145338_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 145338_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:49:48.68 +57:59:46.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.265 2007380096818844032 342.45357902808 +57.99546152286 11.3361 10.0093 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.265#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144029_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 144029_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214296_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 214296_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:38:01.35 +58:34:46.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.444 2179346674645688576 324.50679458763 +58.57993746267 13.5784 12.9674 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.444#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130844_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 130844_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35146_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 35146_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38563_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 38563_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:37:33.74 +64:10:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213595_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 213595_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213509_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 213509_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213409_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 213409_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103524_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 103524_fd_Cep-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-40-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
