This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2769 2461174.7769 10.46 16:44:29.91 -20:47:28.9
358.74250 16.00854 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 2 -1 2 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:29.91 -20:47:28.9: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:29.91 -20:47:28.9: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7769,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2769 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2769 2461174.7769 11.98 16:59:04.23 -14:17:43.5
6.34614 17.06848 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 0 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:59:04.23 -14:17:43.5: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:59:04.23 -14:17:43.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7769,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2769 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2769 2461174.7769 13.55 16:42:57.09 -15:45:49.7
2.69308 19.36267 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 1 -0 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:57.09 -15:45:49.7: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:57.09 -15:45:49.7: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7769,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2769 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2769 2461174.7769 14.07 16:46:18.18 -14:34:17.2
4.21906 19.42454 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia 1 -1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:18.18 -14:34:17.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:18.18 -14:34:17.2: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7769,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2769 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2769 2461174.7769 14.12 16:44:03.83 -17:24:55.9
1.47222 18.15316 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.358 Apollonia 0 0 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:03.83 -17:24:55.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:03.83 -17:24:55.9: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7769,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2769 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2769 2461174.7769 13.05 16:56:05.66 -19:40:19.1
1.37126 14.51840 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J165605.66-194018.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.300 V 14.600 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:05.66 -19:40:19.1: 14.03 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:05.66 -19:40:19.1: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J165605.66-194018.4,2461174.7769,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J165605.66-194018.4 20260514.2769 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2769 2461174.7769 11.86 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.2
1.73807 17.95505 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J164522-1720.1
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.700 V Y 1.030 V 2452184.70000 120.394104000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.2: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.2: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J164522-1720.1,2461174.7769,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J164522-1720.1 20260514.2769 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461174.77712580 14.05.2026 06:38:53.669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5317
Objects passed selection criteria: 5311
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5067.5
Average stars matched: 4574.25 (90.2664 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 01:48:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461174.77712580 14.05.2026 06:38:53.669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 202
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 60513
Objects passed selection criteria: 60418
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57323
Average stars matched: 51570.2 (89.9643 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 166168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 01:51:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461174.77668752
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.660 -17:59:24.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:19.660 -17:59:24.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.903 -17:59:32.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:19.903 -17:59:32.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:19.660 -17:59:24.69
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:19.903 -17:59:32.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00226 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T3E8OWD0k8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b4lde4jKfY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LhXu0XVwhX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TVTkonPGxE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.624800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.624800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6563 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4621 out of 4787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4787 out of 7698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.T3E8OWD0k8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6602
Got 6602 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=163 n_q2=377 n_q3=156 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b4lde4jKfY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7698
Got 7698 stars (including 7205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=181 n_q2=332 n_q3=168 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LhXu0XVwhX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=420, passed=8264
Got 8264 stars (including 7834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.765 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.988 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.959 n_q1=172 n_q2=345 n_q3=152 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.291
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TVTkonPGxE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=8338
Got 8338 stars (including 7908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.769 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.950 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.955 n_q1=170 n_q2=349 n_q3=149 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.618 worst_q_ratio=1.229
ref2=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.064
new1=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits sigma_overall=0.765 worst_q_ratio=1.291
new2=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits sigma_overall=0.769 worst_q_ratio=1.243
reference average sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.1465
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:29.91 -20:47:28.9: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:42.57 -20:27:28.4: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:33.51 -14:35:08.8: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:33.51 -14:35:08.8: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:29.91 -20:47:28.9: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:42.57 -20:27:28.4: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:33.51 -14:35:08.8: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4734 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:42.57 -20:27:28.4: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6716 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21115_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 21115_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21116_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21116_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.85 -19:08:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21118_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21118_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:14.71 -20:10:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21121_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21121_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.63 -18:32:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21123_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21123_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.61 -18:06:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21124_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21124_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21126_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 21126_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:22.62 -17:36:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 20641_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.03 -20:12:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.50 -18:48:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 20177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.29 -17:09:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:44:29.91 -20:47:28.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.660 -17:59:24.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:19.660 -17:59:24.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.903 -17:59:32.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:19.903 -17:59:32.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:19.660 -17:59:24.69
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:19.903 -17:59:32.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00226 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d8yzPMPwZZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AIQAArkc4K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PaTxIQVXgJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Ji52J8RA1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.389800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.389800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 90958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4745 out of 5431 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5431 out of 90958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 120 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.d8yzPMPwZZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4634, passed=76351
Got 76351 stars (including 71611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=166 n_q2=382 n_q3=135 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AIQAArkc4K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=5325, passed=90948
Got 90948 stars (including 85458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90948 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=182 n_q2=326 n_q3=175 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PaTxIQVXgJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=5271, passed=77814
Got 77814 stars (including 72468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77814 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.740 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.961 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.920 n_q1=181 n_q2=320 n_q3=164 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7Ji52J8RA1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=5087, passed=76642
Got 76642 stars (including 71484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76642 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.899 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.983 n_q1=178 n_q2=327 n_q3=161 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.392
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_014333_TTUQ2b1x1_1967795_EjG1ZiDX/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:54:58.91 -19:50:34.7: 13.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:04:30.82 -15:48:37.9: 14.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:49.53 -18:11:44.9: 14.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:04:29.95 -20:48:20.2: 14.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:41:15.10 -20:28:31.5: 13.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:25:32.74 -18:18:53.1: 14.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:49:32.46 -21:04:50.1: 14.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:34.19 -19:51:25.1: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:49.53 -18:11:44.9: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:04:30.82 -15:48:37.9: 14.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:54:58.91 -19:50:34.7: 13.87 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:04:29.95 -20:48:20.2: 14.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:41:15.10 -20:28:31.5: 14.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:25:32.74 -18:18:53.1: 13.88 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:49:32.46 -21:04:50.1: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:32.46 -21:04:50.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1630 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:30.82 -15:48:37.9: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2072 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:15.10 -20:28:31.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1474 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:49.53 -18:11:44.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3025 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:58.91 -19:50:34.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1132 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:29.95 -20:48:20.2: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0364 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:32.74 -18:18:53.1: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2210 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:30:19.60 -15:38:18.1: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:34.19 -19:51:25.1: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:34.19 -19:51:25.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5784 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:30:19.60 -15:38:18.1: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.60 -15:38:18.1: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1094 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:59:04.23 -14:17:43.5: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:43.62 -16:41:36.2: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:59:04.23 -14:17:43.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:57.09 -15:45:49.7: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:34.06 -17:42:50.9: 13.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:43.62 -16:41:36.2: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:43.62 -16:41:36.2: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0255 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:57.09 -15:45:49.7: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:26:45.70 -22:05:25.2: 14.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:18.18 -14:34:17.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:34.06 -17:42:50.9: 13.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:34.06 -17:42:50.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9033 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:23:50.39 -21:40:08.4: 14.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:37.28 -20:51:28.9: 14.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:26:45.70 -22:05:25.2: 14.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:45.70 -22:05:25.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0360 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:18.18 -14:34:17.2: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:15.49 -21:55:01.0: 13.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:23:50.39 -21:40:08.4: 14.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:37.28 -20:51:28.9: 14.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:50.39 -21:40:08.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1381 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:37.28 -20:51:28.9: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1653 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:25:08.04 -21:32:05.9: 14.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:15.49 -21:55:01.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:15.49 -21:55:01.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7628 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:26:08.22 -17:02:22.9: 14.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:23.89 -17:57:37.2: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:25:08.04 -21:32:05.9: 14.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:08.04 -21:32:05.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2129 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:26:08.22 -17:02:22.9: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:08.22 -17:02:22.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2708 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:27:31.92 -21:43:20.2: 14.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:03.83 -17:24:55.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:23.89 -17:57:37.2: 14.08 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:23.89 -17:57:37.2: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3209 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:27:31.92 -21:43:20.2: 14.62 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:31.92 -21:43:20.2: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0512 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:03.83 -17:24:55.9: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:24:50.73 -21:29:50.9: 14.35 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:25:09.51 -19:47:22.4: 14.90 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:26:05.99 -21:08:46.8: 14.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:24:50.73 -21:29:50.9: 14.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:50.73 -21:29:50.9: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2856 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:30:34.10 -20:36:41.0: 14.73 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:25:09.51 -19:47:22.4: 14.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:09.51 -19:47:22.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3752 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:26:05.99 -21:08:46.8: 14.23 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:04.31 -19:52:47.7: 14.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:05.99 -21:08:46.8: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2761 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:30:24.69 -21:56:21.7: 14.70 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:30:34.10 -20:36:41.0: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:34.10 -20:36:41.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3706 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:04.31 -19:52:47.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:04.31 -19:52:47.7: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0918 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:30:24.69 -21:56:21.7: 14.61 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:24.69 -21:56:21.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2017 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:42.40 -21:12:26.1: 14.88 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:58:29.48 -21:27:52.3: 14.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:42.40 -21:12:26.1: 14.78 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:29:10.59 -20:43:12.8: 14.70 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:27.32 -18:13:13.3: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:42.40 -21:12:26.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3547 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:58:29.48 -21:27:52.3: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:29.48 -21:27:52.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9664 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:29:10.59 -20:43:12.8: 14.57 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:38:07.99 -20:43:55.6: 13.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:10.59 -20:43:12.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3143 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:27.32 -18:13:13.3: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:27.32 -18:13:13.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2264 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:27:59.55 -21:47:48.1: 14.55 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:38:07.99 -20:43:55.6: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:07.99 -20:43:55.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1061 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:37:29.98 -20:31:15.4: 14.59 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:41.87 -21:48:48.4: 14.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:27:59.55 -21:47:48.1: 14.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:59.55 -21:47:48.1: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2485 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:37:29.98 -20:31:15.4: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:08:17.40 -14:31:35.1: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:41.87 -21:48:48.4: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:29.98 -20:31:15.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1965 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:41.87 -21:48:48.4: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2636 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:08:17.40 -14:31:35.1: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:17.40 -14:31:35.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3077 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:53:07.70 -22:03:43.5: 14.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:08.93 -21:24:20.9: 14.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:37.16 -20:56:23.9: 14.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:01.70 -19:17:17.4: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:53:07.70 -22:03:43.5: 14.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:07.70 -22:03:43.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0908 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:08.93 -21:24:20.9: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:08.93 -21:24:20.9: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1977 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:37.16 -20:56:23.9: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:37.16 -20:56:23.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1265 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:43.11 -17:43:42.1: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:01.70 -19:17:17.4: 14.59 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:55.76 -20:06:37.6: 14.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:01.70 -19:17:17.4: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2610 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:43.11 -17:43:42.1: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:43.11 -17:43:42.1: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3316 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:55.76 -20:06:37.6: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:55.76 -20:06:37.6: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2786 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:31.10 -19:34:12.3: 14.77 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:31.10 -19:34:12.3: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:04:12.49 -20:38:57.7: 14.92 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:03.19 -19:14:29.7: 14.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:31.10 -19:34:12.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.1433 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:03.19 -19:14:29.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:04:12.49 -20:38:57.7: 15.03 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:03.19 -19:14:29.7: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2359 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:12.49 -20:38:57.7: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.2160 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:05.66 -19:40:19.1: 14.03 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:05.66 -19:40:19.1: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:56:05.66 -19:40:19.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0525 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.2: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.2: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.2: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8545 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103288.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103381.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27251.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49054.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103217_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103217_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103222_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103222_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103225_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103225_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:49.61 -17:33:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103232_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103232_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103234_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103234_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103240_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103240_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103241_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103241_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103245_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103245_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103249_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103249_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103250_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103250_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:08.79 -21:32:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103258_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103258_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103264_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103264_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:45.05 -18:53:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103276_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103276_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:06.45 -21:00:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103277_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103277_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103281_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103281_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:29.91 -20:47:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103283_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103283_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103288_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 103288_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103292_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103292_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103295_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103295_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103298_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103298_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:46.30 -18:21:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103301_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103301_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:47.17 -20:30:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103304_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103304_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:13.51 -20:44:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103306_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103306_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:56.35 -16:08:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103307_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103307_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103309_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103309_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103310_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103310_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103315_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103315_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103316_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103316_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:27.39 -19:15:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103323_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103323_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.55 -21:44:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103326_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 103326_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103328_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103328_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:08.89 -15:54:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:04.89 -16:39:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103333_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103333_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:02.26 -20:30:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103343_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103343_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:23.51 -20:33:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103344_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103344_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103349_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103349_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:15.00 -19:06:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103353_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103353_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103354_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103354_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:01.60 -18:29:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103366_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103366_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:43.70 -20:53:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103371_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103371_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103376_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103376_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:47.16 -20:22:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 103381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103382_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103382_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:14.71 -19:53:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103389_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103389_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:12.77 -19:41:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103390_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103390_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103395_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103395_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103399_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103399_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.23 -21:52:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103401_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103401_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103404_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103404_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:21.80 -16:18:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103411_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103411_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103413_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103413_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:59.84 -18:29:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103421_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103421_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103422_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103422_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103423_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103423_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:57.67 -14:40:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103425_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103425_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:11.27 -16:35:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103431_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103431_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103432_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 103432_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103434_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103434_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:06.69 -19:18:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103438_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103438_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.31 -13:55:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103447_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103447_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103452_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103452_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:22.04 -20:46:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103457_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103457_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103460_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103460_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:06.87 -20:33:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103462_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103462_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103464_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103464_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103470_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103470_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:55.26 -18:02:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103493_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103493_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:18.91 -21:54:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103495_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103495_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103498_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103498_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103501_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103501_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103509_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103509_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103514_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103514_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103520_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103520_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103521_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103521_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:22.14 -21:35:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103522_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103522_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:20.64 -22:07:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103525_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103525_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103527_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103527_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103536_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103536_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103546_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103546_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103560_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103560_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103563_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103563_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103570_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103570_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:29.63 -18:06:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103576_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103576_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103592_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103592_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:49.33 -20:12:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103597_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103597_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103600_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103600_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:29.28 -22:01:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103622_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103622_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103640_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103640_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103646_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103646_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103656_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103656_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103701_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103701_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:59.30 -19:08:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103704_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103704_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103743_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103743_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103755_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103755_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:24.97 -18:29:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103767_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103767_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:28.08 -21:15:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103795_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103795_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103809_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103809_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:52.19 -17:28:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103855_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103855_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:31.27 -18:36:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103882_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103882_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103912_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103912_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103946_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 103946_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:44.19 -20:51:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.63 -18:06:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88925_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 88925_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:08.15 -20:30:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.87 -21:07:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 89327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.04 -20:59:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.47 -18:48:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92462_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 92462_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:04.95 -20:59:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.82 -19:08:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.29 -15:27:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:09.27 -21:29:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:31.55 -18:05:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95095_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 95095_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:29.13 -18:41:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:16.00 -18:56:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.02 -20:12:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.30 -17:09:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89638_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 89638_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.60 -18:32:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11549_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 11549_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:59.02 -21:22:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94594_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025
The candidate 94594_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_01-38-53_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0025 did not pass the final checks
