This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2458 2461174.7458 10.45 16:44:31.51 -20:47:29.4
358.74638 16.00355 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 1 -1 2 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:31.51 -20:47:29.4: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:31.51 -20:47:29.4: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7458,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2458 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2458 2461174.7458 11.97 16:59:05.48 -14:17:49.1
6.34781 17.06345 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -0 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:59:05.48 -14:17:49.1: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:59:05.48 -14:17:49.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7458,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2458 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2458 2461174.7458 11.97 16:42:46.81 -22:47:19.8
356.86020 15.08091 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 2 -0 2 11.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:46.81 -22:47:19.8: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:46.81 -22:47:19.8: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7458,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2458 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2458 2461174.7458 12.52 17:14:41.64 -16:35:34.2
6.57315 12.66379 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 1 -1 2 12.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:14:41.64 -16:35:34.2: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:14:41.64 -16:35:34.2: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7458,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2458 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2458 2461174.7458 12.93 17:09:16.76 -22:40:40.2
0.71938 10.26703 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 0 -1 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:16.76 -22:40:40.2: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:16.76 -22:40:40.2: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7458,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2458 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2458 2461174.7458 13.29 17:18:09.59 -15:35:52.2
7.89389 12.51694 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.159 Aemilia 1 -2 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:18:09.59 -15:35:52.2: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:18:09.59 -15:35:52.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 14.2458* 17 18 09.59 -15 35 52.2 13.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7458,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2458 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2458 2461174.7458 13.80 16:46:19.79 -14:34:17.6
4.22304 19.41924 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia 2 -1 3 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:19.79 -14:34:17.6: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:19.79 -14:34:17.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7458,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2458 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.2458 2461174.7458 13.69 16:42:58.94 -15:45:52.4
2.69717 19.35629 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 2 -1 2 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:58.94 -15:45:52.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:58.94 -15:45:52.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.7458,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.2458 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461174.74603538 14.05.2026 05:54:07.457 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7327
Objects passed selection criteria: 7324
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7014
Average stars matched: 6567.25 (93.6306 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 00:58:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461174.74603538 14.05.2026 05:54:07.457 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 206
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 80805
Objects passed selection criteria: 80700
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 76361.2
Average stars matched: 70191 (91.9197 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1873060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 01:00:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461174.74560836
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:12.294 -17:59:32.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:12.294 -17:59:32.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0282 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:12.058 -17:59:46.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:12.058 -17:59:46.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0323 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:12.294 -17:59:32.12
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:12.058 -17:59:46.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00411 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CU41n1xK0D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MciaSGB1LS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t1miQIRdiK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GE2BdTdUXS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.617200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.617200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6563 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4621 out of 4787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4787 out of 7698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CU41n1xK0D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6602
Got 6602 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=163 n_q2=379 n_q3=154 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MciaSGB1LS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7698
Got 7698 stars (including 7205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=181 n_q2=332 n_q3=168 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t1miQIRdiK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=317, passed=6907
Got 6907 stars (including 6584 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6907 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=184 n_q2=321 n_q3=162 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.029
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GE2BdTdUXS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=324, passed=7016
Got 7016 stars (including 6683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=181 n_q2=322 n_q3=164 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.617 worst_q_ratio=1.232
ref2=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.064
new1=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.029
new2=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.137
reference average sigma_overall=0.5055 worst_q_ratio=1.148
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:31.51 -20:47:29.4: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:48.02 -16:22:50.2: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:57.30 -18:24:57.0: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:58:28.56 -16:20:15.8: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:31.51 -20:47:29.4: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:48.02 -16:22:50.2: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:48.02 -16:22:50.2: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6714 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:57.30 -18:24:57.0: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:57.30 -18:24:57.0: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7534 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:58:28.56 -16:20:15.8: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:28.56 -16:20:15.8: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7357 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21503_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
Preparing report for the candidate 21503_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21505_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21505_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.94 -19:08:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21506_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21506_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.54 -18:06:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21508_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21508_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.53 -14:35:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21510_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21510_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.09 -22:01:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21511_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21511_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:14.71 -20:10:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21512_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21512_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:06.11 -16:58:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21513_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21513_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:01.70 -18:42:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21514_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21514_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.79 -18:32:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21516_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21516_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21518_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21518_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.90 -17:20:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21522_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21522_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21523_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 21523_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 20284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.22 -17:09:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.54 -18:48:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 20839_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:49.98 -20:12:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:44:31.51 -20:47:29.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:12.294 -17:59:32.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:12.294 -17:59:32.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0282 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:12.058 -17:59:46.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:12.058 -17:59:46.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0323 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:12.294 -17:59:32.12
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:12.058 -17:59:46.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00411 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9oQhrWEn0N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ggShPInBgx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oJ3yqwvag8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5ddgpDnobE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.389800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.389800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 90958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4745 out of 5431 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5431 out of 90958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 177 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9oQhrWEn0N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4634, passed=76351
Got 76351 stars (including 71611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=166 n_q2=382 n_q3=135 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ggShPInBgx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5325, passed=90947
Got 90947 stars (including 85457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=182 n_q2=325 n_q3=175 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oJ3yqwvag8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3355, passed=69784
Got 69784 stars (including 66321 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69784 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=185 n_q2=317 n_q3=174 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.994
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5ddgpDnobE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3508, passed=70480
Got 70480 stars (including 66859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70480 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=189 n_q2=310 n_q3=172 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.971
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-53-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005518_TTUQ1b1x1_2154634_57iS1Zw3/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:04.13 -13:42:18.9: 13.89 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:32:23.14 -22:22:02.7: 14.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:49.53 -15:38:08.7: 13.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:48:12.62 -20:10:33.4: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:15:43.42 -19:45:16.3: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:22.07 -19:13:23.6: 14.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:28.16 -18:43:55.7: 14.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:39.92 -14:23:47.3: 13.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:28.77 -20:45:06.3: 13.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:00.71 -15:24:01.9: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:49.53 -15:38:08.7: 13.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:04.13 -13:42:18.9: 14.41 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:49.53 -15:38:08.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8786 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:48:12.62 -20:10:33.4: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:04.13 -13:42:18.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0618 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:32:23.14 -22:22:02.7: 14.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:15:43.42 -19:45:16.3: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:28.16 -18:43:55.7: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:12.62 -20:10:33.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8527 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:22.07 -19:13:23.6: 14.20 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:28.77 -20:45:06.3: 13.61 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:23.14 -22:22:02.7: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1250 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:43.42 -19:45:16.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9284 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:39.92 -14:23:47.3: 14.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:28.16 -18:43:55.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0651 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:28.77 -20:45:06.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7859 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:22.07 -19:13:23.6: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2051 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:39.92 -14:23:47.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1190 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:00.71 -15:24:01.9: 14.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:00.71 -15:24:01.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0808 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:20:03.65 -17:08:57.7: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:21:58.54 -18:15:32.7: 13.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:46.81 -22:47:19.8: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:55.19 -18:44:03.2: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:59:05.48 -14:17:49.1: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:20:03.65 -17:08:57.7: 13.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:21:58.54 -18:15:32.7: 13.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:03.65 -17:08:57.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6025 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:58.54 -18:15:32.7: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4604 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:55.19 -18:44:03.2: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:46.81 -22:47:19.8: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:59:05.48 -14:17:49.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:55.19 -18:44:03.2: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6200 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:14:41.64 -16:35:34.2: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:43.61 -16:41:37.8: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:14:41.64 -16:35:34.2: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:16.76 -22:40:40.2: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:43.61 -16:41:37.8: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:43.61 -16:41:37.8: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8973 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:08:31.43 -19:22:23.7: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:16.76 -22:40:40.2: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:08:31.43 -19:22:23.7: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:31.43 -19:22:23.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2175 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:18:09.59 -15:35:52.2: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:18:09.59 -15:35:52.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:34.07 -17:42:50.8: 13.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:19.79 -14:34:17.6: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:58.94 -15:45:52.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:34.07 -17:42:50.8: 13.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:34.07 -17:42:50.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7957 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:19.79 -14:34:17.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:58.94 -15:45:52.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:24:52.72 -13:09:29.4: 13.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:24:52.72 -13:09:29.4: 13.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:52.72 -13:09:29.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0875 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:16.18 -15:22:50.7: 13.64 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:21:41.44 -22:45:48.1: 13.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:16.18 -15:22:50.7: 13.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:16.18 -15:22:50.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6782 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:21:41.44 -22:45:48.1: 13.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:41.44 -22:45:48.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2831 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:32:41.55 -13:02:01.6: 14.22 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:32:41.55 -13:02:01.6: 14.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:41.55 -13:02:01.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2626 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:20:05.68 -16:14:19.3: 14.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:01.56 -18:31:21.4: 14.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:20:05.68 -16:14:19.3: 14.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:05.68 -16:14:19.3: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7961 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:01.56 -18:31:21.4: 14.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:01.56 -18:31:21.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7326 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:23:15.73 -19:51:42.8: 14.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:08:47.24 -20:22:35.9: 14.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:39:47.01 -16:34:39.4: 14.85 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:23:15.73 -19:51:42.8: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:15.73 -19:51:42.8: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1966 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:08:47.24 -20:22:35.9: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:47.24 -20:22:35.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7943 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:39:47.01 -16:34:39.4: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:47.01 -16:34:39.4: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2391 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:15:12.19 -21:15:55.8: 13.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:13:59.71 -17:22:11.1: 14.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:59:25.00 -19:47:24.9: 14.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:15:12.19 -21:15:55.8: 13.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:13:59.71 -17:22:11.1: 15.04 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:12.19 -21:15:55.8: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4533 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:13:59.71 -17:22:11.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8227 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:59:25.00 -19:47:24.9: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:25.00 -19:47:24.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9268 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:17:00.71 -17:07:46.5: 14.96 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:17:00.71 -17:07:46.5: 14.89 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:17:00.71 -17:07:46.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8627 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:25:08.13 -21:32:08.1: 14.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:04:08.17 -21:02:54.9: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:04:58.99 -13:22:44.8: 14.16 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:25:08.13 -21:32:08.1: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:24.94 -18:29:08.4: 14.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:08.13 -21:32:08.1: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2356 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:08:36.89 -22:05:49.0: 14.60 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:16:01.30 -16:30:42.1: 14.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:04:08.17 -21:02:54.9: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:04:58.99 -13:22:44.8: 14.19 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:58.99 -13:22:44.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1454 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:24.94 -18:29:08.4: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:24.94 -18:29:08.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0294 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:08:36.89 -22:05:49.0: 14.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:36.89 -22:05:49.0: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9111 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:16:01.30 -16:30:42.1: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:01.30 -16:30:42.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8455 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:22:21.89 -14:02:43.6: 14.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:07:31.75 -21:46:51.2: 14.97 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:21:09.65 -20:00:24.1: 14.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:22:21.89 -14:02:43.6: 14.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:21.89 -14:02:43.6: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8676 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:07:31.75 -21:46:51.2: 14.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:10.66 -22:38:01.5: 14.56 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:31.75 -21:46:51.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8544 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:33.07 -13:28:14.5: 14.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:16:15.83 -20:46:11.6: 13.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:21:09.65 -20:00:24.1: 14.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:09.65 -20:00:24.1: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8528 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:13:02.46 -18:20:07.8: 14.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:58:20.68 -20:08:49.9: 14.85 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:29.33 -20:00:58.2: 14.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:10.66 -22:38:01.5: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:33.07 -13:28:14.5: 14.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:10.66 -22:38:01.5: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9607 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:33.07 -13:28:14.5: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9862 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:16:15.83 -20:46:11.6: 14.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:15.83 -20:46:11.6: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7315 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:13:02.46 -18:20:07.8: 14.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:02.46 -18:20:07.8: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0217 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:20:13.73 -13:47:33.5: 14.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:09.60 -20:13:50.8: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:54.61 -16:41:10.3: 14.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:58:20.68 -20:08:49.9: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:20.68 -20:08:49.9: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2217 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:29.33 -20:00:58.2: 14.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:29.33 -20:00:58.2: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8401 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:58:28.16 -21:15:14.9: 14.58 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:20:13.73 -13:47:33.5: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:13.73 -13:47:33.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1189 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:09.60 -20:13:50.8: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:09.60 -20:13:50.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1116 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:54.61 -16:41:10.3: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:54.61 -16:41:10.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1648 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:26.69 -22:04:24.0: 14.56 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:47.46 -21:09:05.3: 14.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:21:26.47 -13:31:20.5: 14.52 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:58:28.16 -21:15:14.9: 14.97 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:28.16 -21:15:14.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2111 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:45.85 -18:03:23.1: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:26.69 -22:04:24.0: 14.82 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:47.46 -21:09:05.3: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:26.69 -22:04:24.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2721 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:47.46 -21:09:05.3: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0906 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:21:26.47 -13:31:20.5: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:26.47 -13:31:20.5: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0320 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:55.31 -18:02:22.0: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:03:26.49 -22:27:06.6: 14.54 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:41.33 -14:14:58.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:45.85 -18:03:23.1: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:45.85 -18:03:23.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2712 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:55.31 -18:02:22.0: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:55.31 -18:02:22.0: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0650 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:03:26.49 -22:27:06.6: 14.65 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:26.49 -22:27:06.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1726 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:41.33 -14:14:58.6: 12.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:41.33 -14:14:58.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:59:29.26 -18:41:05.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:59:29.26 -18:41:05.1: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:59:29.26 -18:41:05.1: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5111 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out108427.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out108445.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out108481.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out98926.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108245.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108248.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108283.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108328.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108332.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108187_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108187_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108188_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108188_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108191_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108191_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108193_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108193_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108194_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108194_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108199_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108199_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108202_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108202_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108203_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108203_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108208_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108208_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108209_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108209_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:30.45 -15:55:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108216_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108216_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108219_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108219_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:34.43 -13:11:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108222_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108222_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108228_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108228_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108234_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108234_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108240_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108240_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:31.50 -20:47:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108245_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
Preparing report for the candidate 108245_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108246_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108246_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108248_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
Preparing report for the candidate 108248_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108249_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108249_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108253_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108253_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108256_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108256_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108257_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108257_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108258_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108258_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108259_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
Preparing report for the candidate 108259_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108263_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108263_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:46.46 -18:20:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108264_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108264_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:13.47 -20:44:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108265_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108265_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:06.15 -21:13:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108268_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108268_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108269_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108269_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108270_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108270_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108271_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108271_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:56.52 -16:08:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108272_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108272_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.13 -22:42:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108275_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108275_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108282_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108282_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.16 -14:20:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108283_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
Preparing report for the candidate 108283_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108286_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108286_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108292_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108292_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:35.84 -22:43:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108293_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108293_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108296_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108296_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:34.24 -16:44:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108298_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108298_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108299_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108299_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108301_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108301_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108302_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108302_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108303_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
Preparing report for the candidate 108303_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108305_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108305_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:38.25 -14:37:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108306_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108306_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:02.21 -20:30:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108308_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108308_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.65 -21:44:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108309_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108309_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108310_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108310_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108311_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108311_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108313_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108313_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108314_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108314_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:08.99 -15:54:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108318_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108318_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108322_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108322_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108323_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108323_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108326_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108326_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108328_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
Preparing report for the candidate 108328_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108332_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
Preparing report for the candidate 108332_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108334_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108334_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108337_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108337_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108338_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108338_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:41.15 -18:31:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108339_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108339_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108340_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108340_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108341_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108341_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108342_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108342_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:22.95 -14:00:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108349_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108349_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:10.02 -13:55:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108350_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108350_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108352_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108352_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108353_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108353_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108354_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108354_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:23.99 -16:12:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108362_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108362_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108364_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108364_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108365_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108365_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108373_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108373_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:57.59 -14:40:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108376_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108376_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108378_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108378_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108379_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108379_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:15.07 -19:06:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108380_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108380_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:33.62 -21:18:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108382_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108382_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108383_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108383_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108387_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108387_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108391_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108391_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108397_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108397_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108399_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108399_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108405_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108405_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108408_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108408_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:23.79 -16:42:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108409_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108409_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108415_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108415_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:35.81 -14:18:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108418_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108418_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108421_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108421_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108423_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108423_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108424_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108424_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108427_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108427_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:59.71 -17:22:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.968 4134827722382657792 258.49878255042 -17.36948123327 14.3828 12.5954 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.968#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108429_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108429_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108433_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108433_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108435_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108435_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:21.84 -16:18:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108437_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108437_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:11.20 -16:35:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108439_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108439_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108444_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108444_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108445_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108445_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:00.71 -17:07:46.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.509 4135222142142891392 259.25338705202 -17.12949452874 12.9619 11.6378 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.509#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108451_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108451_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:55.41 -13:45:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108454_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108454_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:32.64 -16:23:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108456_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108456_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108473_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108473_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:09.09 -13:24:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108474_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108474_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108478_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108478_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.21 -13:37:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108480_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108480_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108481_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108481_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:08.17 -21:02:54.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.549 4127669459332168704 256.03296212901 -21.04975000617 14.3960 13.6108 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.549#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108490_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108490_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108495_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108495_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108499_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108499_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108504_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108504_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108507_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108507_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108521_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108521_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108523_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108523_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108533_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108533_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108539_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108539_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.38 -13:55:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108547_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108547_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108558_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108558_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108576_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108576_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108583_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108583_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108585_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108585_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:29.53 -18:06:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108614_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108614_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108616_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108619_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108619_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108623_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108623_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108629_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108629_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108644_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108644_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108653_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108653_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108678_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108678_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108695_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108695_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108698_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108698_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108701_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108701_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108717_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108717_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108720_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108720_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108730_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108730_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108732_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108732_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108733_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108733_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108750_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108750_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108774_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 108774_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11549_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 11549_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:59.09 -21:22:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88850_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 88850_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:49.89 -23:11:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.55 -18:06:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 87647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:09.44 -21:29:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50158_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 50158_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:06.11 -16:58:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 41742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:14.87 -17:54:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:49.97 -20:12:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 95742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:04.95 -20:59:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61883_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 61883_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.51 -14:09:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68411_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 68411_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:38.86 -15:05:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.23 -17:09:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.36 -15:27:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:16.01 -18:56:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91435_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 91435_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:26.06 -16:37:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91358_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 91358_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.77 -18:32:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:31.56 -18:05:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98926_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 98926_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:29.26 -18:41:05.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.603 4129163867415896576 254.87174764794 -18.68479875083 13.7192 11.7770 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.603#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.53 -18:48:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90882_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 90882_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.10 -20:59:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:05.66 -19:40:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02167_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 02167_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:09.44 -22:44:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48402_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 48402_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:49.13 -17:14:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 90243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:08.11 -20:30:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27220_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 27220_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:20.10 -19:22:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.93 -19:08:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90163_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 90163_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:45.47 -15:48:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69995_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 69995_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:05.59 -15:26:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.89 -21:07:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01697_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 01697_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.33 -22:43:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.92 -17:20:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98138_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 98138_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:25.21 -19:53:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05907_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008
The candidate 05907_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_00-54-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0008 did not pass the final checks
