This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3272 2461173.8272 14.75 05:45:04.86 +80:21:58.6
133.04471 24.01841 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.0" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:45:04.86 +80:21:58.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 05:45:04.86 +80:21:58.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 05:45:04.86 +80:21:58.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461173.8272,14.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260513.3272 14.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3272 2461173.8272 14.74 02:26:11.21 +79:31:10.2
127.32561 17.46516 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:26:11.21 +79:31:10.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:26:11.21 +79:31:10.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:26:11.21 +79:31:10.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461173.8272,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260513.3272 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3272 2461173.8272 14.40 06:03:12.44 +76:27:29.0
137.39895 23.56403 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.0" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:03:12.44 +76:27:29.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 06:03:12.44 +76:27:29.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 06:03:12.44 +76:27:29.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461173.8272,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260513.3272 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3272 2461173.8272 14.61 03:33:29.24 +77:21:33.3
131.49338 17.26911 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:33:29.24 +77:21:33.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:33:29.24 +77:21:33.3: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:33:29.24 +77:21:33.3: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.3272* 03 33 29.24 +77 21 33.3 14.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461173.8272,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260513.3272 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3272 2461173.8272 11.60 04:11:42.30 +79:06:54.7
131.78865 19.87095 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 1.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0411418+790654
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.862 g Y 1.042 g 2458410.73100 270.748525400000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:11:42.30 +79:06:54.7: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:11:42.30 +79:06:54.7: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0411418+790654,2461173.8272,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0411418+790654 20260513.3272 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3272 2461173.8272 12.87 03:39:27.57 +77:26:54.3
131.70494 17.53967 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V1023 Cep
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.450 R1 11.800 R1 M3III
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:39:27.57 +77:26:54.3: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:39:27.57 +77:26:54.3: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1023 Cep,2461173.8272,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1023 Cep 20260513.3272 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69447938 09.01.2026 04:39:53.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
First image: 2461049.69447938 09.01.2026 04:39:53.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Last image: 2461173.82744656 13.05.2026 07:51:21.383 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16214
Objects passed selection criteria: 16192
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13770.2
Average stars matched: 13275 (96.4035 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120316 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 04:50:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
***** MAGNITUDE CALIBRATION ERROR (mag calibration script exited with code 1) *****
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69447938 09.01.2026 04:39:53.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
First image: 2461049.69447938 09.01.2026 04:39:53.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Last image: 2461173.82744656 13.05.2026 07:51:21.383 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 135 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 106029
Objects passed selection criteria: 105767
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86693.5
Average stars matched: 82980 (95.7165 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1934216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 04:55:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.82703031
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 10376 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2004115.xyls"...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 10368 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
Generating wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat from image00001.cat
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Generating wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2004118.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2004115.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
log-odds ratio 81.3564 (2.15102e+35), 15 match, 0 conflict, 28 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3533,77.515), pixel scale 5.98432 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +----+++---+-+-+-+-+--++-+--++------------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2004115.solved to indicate this.
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits created.
Reading file "./out2004118.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 55.5376 (1.31721e+24), 17 match, 0 conflict, 72 distractors, 56 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3641,77.5201), pixel scale 5.97195 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-----+-----+-+-----+---+--+--+-----+-----+-+---+-------------+--+--+-----------+-----+(best)-----------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2004118.solved to indicate this.
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:06.607 +77:30:36.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 16361 stars ###
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 16218 stars ###
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2005531.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2005588.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Field: out2004118.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.361808, 77.516940) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:01:26.834, +77:31:00.984).
Field size: 15.7844 x 10.5875 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 2.67859 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out2004115.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.348356, 77.517226) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:01:23.606, +77:31:02.013).
Field size: 15.7803 x 10.5857 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 2.67847 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header...
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits' -> 'fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits' -> 'fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 04:50 fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 04:50 out2004115.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 04:50 fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 04:50 out2004118.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits)... done!
done!
done!
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits (fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits (fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2004115.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2004118.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2004118.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.735 degrees of RA,Dec (60.3658,77.5177)
Reading file "./out2004115.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.73 degrees of RA,Dec (60.3524,77.518)
log-odds ratio 78.2464 (9.59326e+33), 15 match, 0 conflict, 32 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3612,77.5146), pixel scale 5.9841 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+-++----+-+-+-+-+---+-++-++----------------+(best)-----------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 81.3564 (2.15102e+35), 15 match, 0 conflict, 28 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3533,77.515), pixel scale 5.98432 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +----+++---+-+-+-+-+--++-+--++------------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2004115.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2004118.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2004118.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.362522, 77.514028) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:01:27.005, +77:30:50.501).
Field size: 15.7686 x 10.5914 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 2.69768 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out2004115.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.354655, 77.514457) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:01:25.117, +77:30:52.046).
Field size: 15.7686 x 10.5913 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 2.69546 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 04:50 fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 04:50 out2004118.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 04:50 fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 04:50 out2004115.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
All done!
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 47272 sources.
simplexy: found 47406 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7453, 955.581] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 51.256 (1.8206e+22), 14 match, 0 conflict, 315 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3585,77.5132), pixel scale 5.98735 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------++--------------------------------------------------+--+-------------------------------------
--> log-odds 51.256
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 165.389 (6.7251e+71), 25 match, 0 conflict, 304 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3585,77.5132), pixel scale 5.98735 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------++--------+-----------------------------------------+--+-----+--------------+----------------
--> log-odds 165.389
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 532.59 (1.99908e+231), 58 match, 0 conflict, 416 distractors, 58 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3585,77.5132), pixel scale 5.98735 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------++-+------+--+---+-+--------+---------+-----+-------+-++++---+-----+--------+-------+-+------
--> log-odds 532.59
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 993.169 (inf), 102 match, 0 conflict, 372 distractors, 102 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3585,77.5132), pixel scale 5.98735 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--++-+--+---+--+---+-+--+----+++-+---+--+-+-+-+-+-----+-++++---+----++--+---+-+-----+-+-+-----+
--> log-odds 993.169
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1960.15 (inf), 201 match, 0 conflict, 273 distractors, 201 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3585,77.5132), pixel scale 5.98735 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+++-+--+-++++-++--+-++-+++-++++++++-++-+++-+++-++----+-++++--+++---+++++++++++----++++-+---+++
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7457, 955.586] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 59.1495 (4.8786e+25), 14 match, 0 conflict, 323 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3506,77.5137), pixel scale 5.98738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+--------++--------------------------------------------+--------------+--------+-------------
--> log-odds 1960.15
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3447.18 (inf), 369 match, 0 conflict, 435 distractors, 371 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3585,77.5132), pixel scale 5.98735 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++++++-+++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++-+++++-+++++++++++++-++++++++--+++
--> log-odds 3447.18
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6239.7 (inf), 721 match, 0 conflict, 1029 distractors, 733 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3585,77.5132), pixel scale 5.98735 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6239.7
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11368.7 (inf), 1431 match, 1 conflict, 2542 distractors, 1455 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3585,77.5132), pixel scale 5.98735 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 59.1495
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 161.841 (1.93462e+70), 25 match, 0 conflict, 312 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3506,77.5137), pixel scale 5.98738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+--------++------------------------------------------+-+----+---------+--------+-------------
--> log-odds 161.841
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 534.16 (9.61129e+231), 58 match, 0 conflict, 464 distractors, 58 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3506,77.5137), pixel scale 5.98738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+---+---+----+++-+---+----+-----+-------------+---+--++--+-+----+---+-----+-------++---++-------+
--> log-odds 534.16
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 997.949 (inf), 102 match, 0 conflict, 420 distractors, 102 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3506,77.5137), pixel scale 5.98738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+-+--+++---+++-++--+-+--++--+-++-+----------++--+--++--+-++-+-+---+--+--+----+--++---++----+-++
--> log-odds 997.949
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1963.04 (inf), 201 match, 0 conflict, 321 distractors, 201 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3506,77.5137), pixel scale 5.98738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-+++++++++-+++++++--+++--+++-+-++++---++-++++++-+++-+++++-++-+++-+-+++++-+++-+++-++--+++----+-++
--> log-odds 1963.04
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3455.83 (inf), 370 match, 0 conflict, 472 distractors, 371 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3506,77.5137), pixel scale 5.98738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++--+++++++++-++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++-+++++
--> log-odds 3455.83
--> log-odds 11368.7
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6258.17 (inf), 723 match, 0 conflict, 1091 distractors, 733 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3506,77.5137), pixel scale 5.98738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6258.17
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11434.1 (inf), 1438 match, 0 conflict, 2187 distractors, 1455 index.
RA,Dec = (60.3506,77.5137), pixel scale 5.98738 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11434.1
Got 8 solutions.
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.362222, 77.513864) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:01:26.933, +77:30:49.910).
Field size: 15.767 x 10.5872 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 2.68271 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.new"...
Field: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (60.354444, 77.514293) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:01:25.067, +77:30:51.456).
Field size: 15.7671 x 10.5872 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 2.68033 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat from image00003.cat
renamed 'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits'
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Image size: 940.8'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:01:26.031 +77:30:54.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
### Converted positions of 11388 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2016988.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:01:27.898 +77:30:52.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11413 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2017261.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:01:26.031 +77:30:54.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 04:01:26.031 +77:30:54.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0782 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:01:27.898 +77:30:52.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 04:01:27.898 +77:30:52.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0798 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:01:26.031 +77:30:54.31
Second-epoch second image center 04:01:27.898 +77:30:52.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00174 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.10eRbUxckK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w7Inm3rxFM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7JR2lp5bWK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ilxW085Tx9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
ERROR in util/transients/calibrate_current_field_with_tycho2.sh : cannot find the WCS-calibrated image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits which was supposed to be created by util/wcs_image_calibration.sh
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Forced-photometry filter: lightcurve calib.png was not archived at transient_report/calib_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1.png; skipping per-reference-image calibration
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.10eRbUxckK (3) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1344, passed=16361
Got 16361 stars (including 14997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=221 n_q2=262 n_q3=230 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.w7Inm3rxFM (3) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1323, passed=16218
Got 16218 stars (including 14876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=219 n_q2=268 n_q3=229 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7JR2lp5bWK (3) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=582, passed=11388
Got 11388 stars (including 10801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=220 n_q2=233 n_q3=250 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ilxW085Tx9 (3) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=566, passed=11413
Got 11413 stars (including 10841 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11413 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=219 n_q2=234 n_q3=251 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Last image: 2461173.82703031 13.05.2026 07:50:45.419 UTC
ERROR calibrating magnitudes in the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION_SCRIPT_EXIT_CODE=1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits was not found.
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
The guess is 573 arcmin.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits created.
Image size: 940.8'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:01:26.031 +77:30:54.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:01:27.898 +77:30:52.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:06.607 +77:30:36.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 62839 stars ###
### Converted positions of 63296 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2267053.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2266925.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
### Converted positions of 111565 stars ###
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 111259 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2268158.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2268103.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:01:26.031 +77:30:54.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 04:01:26.031 +77:30:54.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0782 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:01:27.898 +77:30:52.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 04:01:27.898 +77:30:52.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0798 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:01:26.031 +77:30:54.31
Second-epoch second image center 04:01:27.898 +77:30:52.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00174 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OmWbn9X9L3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lnl6L2jaUM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZXWwMB1Og9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8rgTJgvyv8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 111259 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec +69.5589 to +83.1453 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec 69.5589 to 83.1453 deg
Loaded 18250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7278 out of 9109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9109 out of 111259 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.773250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.773250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 111259 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec +69.5589 to +83.1453 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec 69.5589 to 83.1453 deg
Loaded 18250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7278 out of 9109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9109 out of 111259 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 111565 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9567 to 104.0455 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1563 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9567 to 104.0455 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1563 deg
Loaded 18244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7245 out of 9101 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9101 out of 111565 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 136 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
1.9 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OmWbn9X9L3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=9167, passed=111229
Got 111229 stars (including 101869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=226 n_q2=264 n_q3=236 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lnl6L2jaUM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=9221, passed=111540
Got 111540 stars (including 102140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=228 n_q2=271 n_q3=223 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZXWwMB1Og9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3485, passed=63284
Got 63284 stars (including 59730 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=207 n_q2=232 n_q3=260 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8rgTJgvyv8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3342, passed=62822
Got 62822 stars (including 59406 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=209 n_q2=231 n_q3=260 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-50-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0289.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_035413_TTUQ1b1x1_3748257_bGtpuirj/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 05:44:33.20 +74:34:20.4: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 05:44:33.20 +74:34:20.4: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:33.20 +74:34:20.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2463 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:38:12.67 +75:32:47.1: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:38:12.67 +75:32:47.1: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:38:12.67 +75:32:47.1: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5638 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 05:25:47.44 +78:25:41.4: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 05:25:47.44 +78:25:41.4: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:47.44 +78:25:41.4: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8071 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:32:31.31 +81:58:24.6: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:32:31.31 +81:58:24.6: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:31.31 +81:58:24.6: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0565 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 05:45:04.86 +80:21:58.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 05:45:04.86 +80:21:58.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:58:17.51 +80:34:10.6: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 06:03:12.44 +76:27:29.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:26:11.21 +79:31:10.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:58:17.51 +80:34:10.6: 14.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:58:17.51 +80:34:10.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7036 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:26:11.21 +79:31:10.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 06:03:12.44 +76:27:29.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:33:29.24 +77:21:33.3: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:33:29.24 +77:21:33.3: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:11:42.30 +79:06:54.7: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:11:42.30 +79:06:54.7: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:11:42.30 +79:06:54.7: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5970 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:39:27.57 +77:26:54.3: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:39:27.57 +77:26:54.3: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:39:27.57 +77:26:54.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8696 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135397.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135543.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135644.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33685.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 30s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130960_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 130960_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:27.77 +76:00:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130966_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 130966_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:57.41 +81:05:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130969_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 130969_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130971_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 130971_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:20.70 +72:25:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130972_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 130972_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:03.28 +79:32:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131210_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 131210_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131500_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 131500_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:36.38 +80:18:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131549_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 131549_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131586_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 131586_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:07.81 +79:43:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131621_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 131621_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131703_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 131703_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:52.52 +80:09:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131745_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 131745_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131844_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 131844_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132172_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132172_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132448_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132448_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:06:48.11 +79:26:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132452_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132452_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:14.72 +76:27:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132469_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132469_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132551_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132551_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132603_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132603_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:06:13.28 +75:30:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132832_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132832_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:09:10.76 +80:05:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132853_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132853_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:28.99 +80:19:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132889_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132889_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132955_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132955_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:38.05 +81:39:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132964_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132964_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132966_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132966_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:47.10 +73:40:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132979_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 132979_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:18.68 +79:44:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133021_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133021_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133088_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133088_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:16.48 +80:02:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133121_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133121_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:49.83 +73:22:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133136_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133136_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:09.87 +75:57:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133228_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133228_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133238_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133238_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133289_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133289_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:25.93 +80:31:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133310_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133310_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:22.37 +78:44:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133321_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133321_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:58.25 +72:49:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133377_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133377_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:14.05 +76:18:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133423_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133423_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133452_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133452_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:08.12 +82:23:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133474_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133474_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133541_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133541_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:58:30.73 +77:04:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133565_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133565_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133625_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133625_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133742_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133742_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:09.85 +75:18:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133743_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133743_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:04:35.93 +75:55:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133756_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133756_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133764_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133764_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133798_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133798_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:03.46 +80:00:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133801_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133801_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133810_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133810_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:08.79 +75:32:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133844_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133844_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133850_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133850_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133856_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133856_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133884_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133884_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133946_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133946_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133984_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133984_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:50.29 +78:20:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133997_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 133997_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134015_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134015_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134024_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134024_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:04.98 +76:24:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134026_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134026_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:28.15 +75:13:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134032_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134032_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:35.06 +76:35:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134044_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134044_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134064_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134064_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134089_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134089_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:16.54 +73:34:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134091_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134091_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134131_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134131_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:16.13 +74:37:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134151_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134151_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:04.09 +81:02:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134172_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134172_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:54:25.83 +79:03:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134184_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134184_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:46.42 +80:05:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134220_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134220_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:04.61 +78:02:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134239_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134239_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134271_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134271_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:21.35 +79:18:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134298_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134298_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134306_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134306_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134331_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134331_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:00.23 +79:46:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134378_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134378_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:45.86 +76:59:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134386_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134386_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134407_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134407_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134458_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134458_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134475_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134475_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134493_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134493_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134506_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134506_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:56.32 +81:02:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134525_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134525_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134539_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134539_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134567_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134567_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134580_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134580_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134592_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134592_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134596_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134596_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:11.15 +75:56:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134652_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134652_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:43.41 +79:03:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134674_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134674_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134680_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134680_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134745_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134745_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:28.85 +78:31:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134796_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134796_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134797_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134797_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134919_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134919_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134935_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134935_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134943_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134943_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:21.14 +79:39:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134967_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134967_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134975_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134975_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134987_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 134987_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135012_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135012_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135017_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135017_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:47.09 +81:29:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135048_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135048_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135050_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135050_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135071_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135071_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135127_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135127_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135164_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135164_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135178_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135178_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135184_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135184_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135185_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135185_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135222_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135222_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135267_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135267_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135289_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135289_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135368_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135368_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135397_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
Preparing report for the candidate 135397_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135485_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135485_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135486_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135486_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135490_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135490_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135507_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135507_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135533_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135533_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135543_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
Preparing report for the candidate 135543_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135555_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
Preparing report for the candidate 135555_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135616_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135616_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135620_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135620_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135639_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135639_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135640_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135640_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135644_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
Preparing report for the candidate 135644_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135666_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 135666_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62490_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 62490_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:18.05 +76:51:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80495_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 80495_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59555_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 59555_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33685_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
Preparing report for the candidate 33685_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88814_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 88814_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:48.32 +73:56:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40462_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 40462_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:15.32 +78:45:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55347_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
Preparing report for the candidate 55347_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63198_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 63198_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:19.45 +76:43:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100292_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290
The candidate 100292_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290 did not pass the final checks
