NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-05-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 203884 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 203884 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits

renamed 'UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 483.0947 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 505.4854 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 915.8918 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 483.7635 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 916.2467 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 483.9771 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.89588 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-13T02:45:35.4504495' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-13T07:45:35.4504495' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61173.3233269677 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-13T07:45:45.3500392' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61173.3234415511 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 205.717111470551 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9998220800289 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.3455555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 330.484444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.26230630606245 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20402 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20402 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 14.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits :) Spent 0.668231 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 42267.109959 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27349.0, right_median=33499.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-13T02:46:27.0442844' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-13T07:46:27.0442844' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61173.3239241205 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-13T07:46:36.9486409' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61173.32403875 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 205.717111523697 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9998220269811 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.2561111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 330.401388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.2638259018811 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20402 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20402 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 14.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits :) Spent 0.654558 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 42267.109959 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27349.0, right_median=33499.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits


fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.82344271 Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits was not set. Trying to guess... Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits .... Determining astrometry method... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits was not set. Trying to guess... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... The guess is 570 arcmin. /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6775 high-SNR stars for plate solving '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 570 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits was not found. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6777 high-SNR stars for plate solving ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3056984.xyls"... ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3056985.xyls"... Generating wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat from image00002.cat Generating wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat from image00001.cat Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:52.147 +62:00:14.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 7551 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 7062 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3057474.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3057424.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3056985.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading file "./out3056984.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 24.8824 (6.40131e+10), 9 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 47 index. RA,Dec = (205.712,62.0295), pixel scale 5.93393 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+-++--+-+-----++--+--+(best)----------------------------+-----+-------------------------------------- log-odds ratio 24.607 (4.86032e+10), 9 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 47 index. RA,Dec = (205.725,62.0165), pixel scale 5.93378 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+-++--+-+---+--+----++(best)----------------------------+-----------+-------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3056985.solved to indicate this. Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3056984.solved to indicate this. Field: out3056985.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.711062, 62.020942) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:42:50.655, +62:01:15.390). Field size: 15.7203 x 10.5 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.295 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Field: out3056984.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.723887, 62.007919) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:42:53.733, +62:00:28.509). Field size: 15.7202 x 10.4999 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.292 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 04:19 fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 04:19 out3056984.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 04:19 fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 04:19 out3056985.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits)... done! Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits)... done! done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits (fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3056984.xyls"... Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3056985.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3056984.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.6567 degrees of RA,Dec (205.722,62.0071) log-odds ratio 85.4039 (1.23148e+37), 16 match, 0 conflict, 15 distractors, 22 index. RA,Dec = (205.709,61.998), pixel scale 5.95292 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++++-+-----+++--+---+---++(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------- Reading file "./out3056985.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.6567 degrees of RA,Dec (205.709,62.0201) log-odds ratio 87.0526 (6.40436e+37), 16 match, 0 conflict, 15 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (205.696,62.0111), pixel scale 5.95301 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+++++-+++------++++--+-----++(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3056984.solved to indicate this. Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3056985.solved to indicate this. Field: out3056984.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.715127, 62.000363) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:42:51.631, +62:00:01.308). Field size: 15.7074 x 10.5341 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.245 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Field: out3056985.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.702340, 62.013437) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:42:48.562, +62:00:48.372). Field size: 15.7075 x 10.5341 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.248 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 04:19 fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 04:19 out3056984.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits)... done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 04:19 fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 04:19 out3056985.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits)... done! done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits"... The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... 'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt' simplexy: found 27262 sources. simplexy: found 27304 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4681, 951.426] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 0 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 110.335 (8.27653e+47), 21 match, 0 conflict, 351 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (205.704,62.0143), pixel scale 5.96131 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------------+---------------------+-----+++--+----+-----------------------------------------+------ --> log-odds 110.335 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 418.398 (5.10474e+181), 47 match, 0 conflict, 325 distractors, 47 index. RA,Dec = (205.704,62.0143), pixel scale 5.96131 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----------+-+---+-++---+--+-----+-+---+++--+----++------------+---------+------+-+--+-----+------ --> log-odds 418.398 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 841.901 (inf), 89 match, 0 conflict, 283 distractors, 89 index. RA,Dec = (205.704,62.0143), pixel scale 5.96131 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++----+--+--+-+-+-++++--+++-+-----+-++--+++--+----++------+---+-+--------++------+-+--+--++-+--+-+- --> log-odds 841.901 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1866.16 (inf), 198 match, 0 conflict, 298 distractors, 198 index. RA,Dec = (205.704,62.0143), pixel scale 5.96131 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+--+--++++++-+++++++-++++++-++-+-+++++++-++++-+++--+--+++++++++++-++--++--+-+-+++-++++++++-++-++ --> log-odds 1866.16 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3407.81 (inf), 379 match, 0 conflict, 436 distractors, 381 index. RA,Dec = (205.704,62.0143), pixel scale 5.96131 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++-++++++++++++++++++++ Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4684, 951.43] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 8.22837 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 113.443 (1.85126e+49), 21 match, 0 conflict, 366 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (205.717,62.0012), pixel scale 5.96134 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+----+-----------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+------------------------ --> log-odds 3407.81 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6100.71 (inf), 733 match, 0 conflict, 1209 distractors, 736 index. RA,Dec = (205.704,62.0143), pixel scale 5.96131 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 113.443 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 409.676 (8.31454e+177), 47 match, 0 conflict, 340 distractors, 48 index. RA,Dec = (205.717,62.0012), pixel scale 5.96134 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+-+++---------++----+------++----------+-+----+--+-+---------+------+-------+--------+------- --> log-odds 409.676 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 835.538 (inf), 89 match, 0 conflict, 305 distractors, 90 index. RA,Dec = (205.717,62.0012), pixel scale 5.96134 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+-++++----+---++----+------++----+--+--+-++++-++++-++-------++------+-------+------+-+----+-- --> log-odds 835.538 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1852.11 (inf), 197 match, 0 conflict, 251 distractors, 198 index. RA,Dec = (205.717,62.0012), pixel scale 5.96134 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++++++++++--+-+--++++-+-++++++++++--++-++--++++++-+++++++-++++-++++--+--+-++-+++++-+--++++--++++- --> log-odds 6100.71 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 10983.4 (inf), 1437 match, 1 conflict, 2209 distractors, 1449 index. RA,Dec = (205.704,62.0143), pixel scale 5.96131 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 1852.11 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3396.87 (inf), 378 match, 0 conflict, 365 distractors, 381 index. RA,Dec = (205.717,62.0012), pixel scale 5.96134 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++++++++++- --> log-odds 10983.4 Got 7 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.702058, 62.013910) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:42:48.494, +62:00:50.075). Field size: 15.7073 x 10.5301 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.238 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.new"... --> log-odds 3396.87 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6086.13 (inf), 733 match, 0 conflict, 1171 distractors, 737 index. RA,Dec = (205.717,62.0012), pixel scale 5.96134 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ renamed 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat from image00004.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits --> log-odds 6086.13 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 10967.5 (inf), 1439 match, 2 conflict, 2790 distractors, 1451 index. RA,Dec = (205.717,62.0012), pixel scale 5.96134 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:48.065 +62:00:47.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 7073 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3158560.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits --> log-odds 10967.5 Got 7 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.714794, 62.000851) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:42:51.550, +62:00:03.065). Field size: 15.7073 x 10.5301 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.235 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:51.122 +62:00:00.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 7059 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3163331.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:51.122 +62:00:00.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 Second-epoch image center 13:42:51.122 +62:00:00.13 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:48.065 +62:00:47.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 Second-epoch image center 13:42:48.065 +62:00:47.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0175 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:42:51.122 +62:00:00.13 Second-epoch second image center 13:42:48.065 +62:00:47.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01436 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2kIzyLzPmx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t4zwhQ7lhQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dbhb3LFT9N Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.95Qf433pwW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6104 to 225.4415 deg, Dec +55.7896 to +67.2870 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6104 to 225.4415 deg, Dec 55.7896 to 67.2870 deg Loaded 6234 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3963 out of 4107 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 7551 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.908300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.908300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6104 to 225.4415 deg, Dec +55.7896 to +67.2870 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6104 to 225.4415 deg, Dec 55.7896 to 67.2870 deg Loaded 6234 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3963 out of 4107 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 7551 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 7062 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6575 to 224.9383 deg, Dec +55.9545 to +67.2617 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6575 to 224.9383 deg, Dec 55.9545 to 67.2617 deg Loaded 6026 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4057 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4057 out of 7062 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 2.5 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 2.4 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 2.5 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.2kIzyLzPmx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=445, passed=7551 Got 7551 stars (including 7102 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=219 n_q2=256 n_q3=216 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.t4zwhQ7lhQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=449, passed=7062 Got 7062 stars (including 6606 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7062 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.616 n_q1=282 n_q2=212 n_q3=235 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.568 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Dbhb3LFT9N (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, passed=7059 Got 7059 stars (including 6666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7059 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7000 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7000 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7000 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=262 n_q2=229 n_q3=227 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.370 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.95Qf433pwW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=7073 Got 7073 stars (including 6688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7073 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=264 n_q2=234 n_q3=223 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.379 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21902_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 21902_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    12.14    13:01:54.04 +65:54:06.8   7349 0665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:01:54.00 +65:54:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21904_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 21904_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    12.12    13:25:56.52 +62:22:51.9   5972 2950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:25:56.53 +62:22:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21909_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 21909_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    12.31    13:47:30.24 +60:40:44.5   4431 3993   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:47:30.26 +60:40:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits was not set. Trying to guess... It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. The guess is 605 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits was not found. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits was not found. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits was not set. Trying to guess... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 570 arcmin. The guess is 570 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits was not found. Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat from image00004.cat Generating wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat from image00003.cat verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Generating wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat from image00001.cat Generating wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat from image00002.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:51.122 +62:00:00.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:48.065 +62:00:47.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:52.147 +62:00:14.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 34652 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 32649 stars ### ### Converted positions of 34369 stars ### ### Converted positions of 36890 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3312731.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3312794.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3312705.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3312872.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:51.122 +62:00:00.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 Second-epoch image center 13:42:51.122 +62:00:00.13 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:48.065 +62:00:47.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 Second-epoch image center 13:42:48.065 +62:00:47.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0175 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:42:51.122 +62:00:00.13 Second-epoch second image center 13:42:48.065 +62:00:47.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01436 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fxm1vzI9uS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ouwh83FOJY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nhRFRo3B9w Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ilijaLCvix Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 36890 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.4651 to 225.4414 deg, Dec +55.7896 to +67.2893 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.4651 to 225.4414 deg, Dec 55.7896 to 67.2893 deg Loaded 6263 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3770 out of 4119 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4119 out of 36890 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 36890 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.4651 to 225.4414 deg, Dec +55.7896 to +67.2893 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.4651 to 225.4414 deg, Dec 55.7896 to 67.2893 deg Loaded 6263 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3770 out of 4119 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4119 out of 36890 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 32649 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.2770 to 225.0772 deg, Dec +55.9198 to +67.2675 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.2770 to 225.0772 deg, Dec 55.9198 to 67.2675 deg Loaded 6126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 4057 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4057 out of 32649 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 2.3 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 2.3 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 2.3 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 15.4 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 15.4 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Fxm1vzI9uS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1687, passed=36878 Got 36878 stars (including 35151 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36878 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36375 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36373 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36373 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=220 n_q2=251 n_q3=215 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ouwh83FOJY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2144, passed=32641 Got 32641 stars (including 30457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32641 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32021 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.627 n_q1=293 n_q2=210 n_q3=238 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nhRFRo3B9w (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1592, passed=34645 Got 34645 stars (including 33014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34645 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34326 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34325 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34325 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.521 n_q1=267 n_q2=235 n_q3=220 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ilijaLCvix (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1585, passed=34357 Got 34357 stars (including 32734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34357 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34012 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34013 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34013 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=272 n_q2=228 n_q3=222 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.382 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:07:05.73 +57:51:35.0: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:13:09.66 +57:41:06.7: 15.10 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:40:58.59 +65:19:36.9: 15.53 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:14:40.75 +61:28:12.5: 14.44 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:24:13.78 +64:13:18.4: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:07:05.73 +57:51:35.0: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:33:09.86 +65:38:28.6: 15.11 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:58:40.30 +61:53:00.7: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:40:58.59 +65:19:36.9: 15.67 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:05.73 +57:51:35.0: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7211 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:09:37.90 +59:17:41.1: 15.37 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:40:58.59 +65:19:36.9: ref_mag=15.58 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7280 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:13:09.66 +57:41:06.7: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:14:40.75 +61:28:12.5: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:13:02.70 +65:46:39.5: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:09.66 +57:41:06.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7593 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:24:13.78 +64:13:18.4: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:14:40.75 +61:28:12.5: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6339 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:13.78 +64:13:18.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7025 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:33:09.86 +65:38:28.6: 14.97 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:58:40.30 +61:53:00.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:33:09.86 +65:38:28.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7653 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:58:40.30 +61:53:00.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7432 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:09:37.90 +59:17:41.1: 14.96 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:13:02.70 +65:46:39.5: 15.71 +/- 0.31 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:09:37.90 +59:17:41.1: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8217 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:02.70 +65:46:39.5: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9067 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58475_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58475_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.85    14:13:09.63 +57:41:07.1   2301 5640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.70    14:13:09.69 +57:41:06.3   2297 5648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58487_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58487_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.67    14:24:13.37 +64:13:18.9   2093 1593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.74    14:24:14.19 +64:13:17.9   2089 1600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58496_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58496_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    13.41    13:37:06.78 +60:40:60.0   5199 3999   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:37:06.71 +60:40:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58498_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58498_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    12.97    13:14:12.96 +64:16:15.0   6683 1749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:14:12.90 +64:16:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58499_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58499_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    12.95    13:50:02.41 +58:38:15.4   4192 5222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:50:02.44 +58:38:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58548_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58548_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    12.86    13:55:46.93 +63:10:00.8   3914 2464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:55:46.95 +63:10:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58658_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58658_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.36    13:34:21.73 +64:55:47.5   5353 1429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:34:21.91 +64:55:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58719_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58719_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.57    14:14:40.65 +61:28:11.5   2492 3345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.73    14:14:40.85 +61:28:13.4   2488 3352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58750_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58750_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.73    13:40:58.57 +65:19:37.3   4934 1183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.73    13:40:58.61 +65:19:36.6   4931 1191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58761_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58761_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.64    14:07:05.79 +57:51:35.4   2803 5590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.86    14:07:05.68 +57:51:34.6   2799 5597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58776_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58776_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.88    14:03:20.99 +61:03:02.6   3280 3698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 14:03:20.91 +61:03:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58796_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58796_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.83    13:33:09.82 +65:38:28.5   5424 0987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.72    13:33:09.90 +65:38:28.7   5420 0995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58846_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58846_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.91    13:13:02.68 +65:46:39.9   6672 0821   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.91    13:13:02.72 +65:46:39.1   6668 0830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58848_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58848_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.82    13:09:37.98 +59:17:41.3   7334 4706   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.82    13:09:37.81 +59:17:40.9   7330 4715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58881_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 58881_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 13.32344    2461173.82344    14.87    13:58:40.34 +61:53:01.5   3663 3216   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    14.66    13:58:40.26 +61:52:59.9   3659 3224   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28538_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 The candidate 28538_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 13.32404    2461173.82404    12.29    13:01:54.05 +65:54:06.7   7349 0665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_033342_TTUQ2b1x1_1772378_0c4WqsKa/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-46-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits **** FOUND 13:01:54.01 +65:54:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461173.82344271 -observatory V36 03:12:58.79 +17:50:26.5 Mercury (-2.2mag) 05:28:11.77 +24:38:11.1 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:35:18.72 +09:04:47.7 Mars (1.2mag) 07:28:32.42 +22:16:48.0 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:40:37.77 +01:58:40.4 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:53:56.74 +20:06:57.4 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:14:03.04 +00:04:31.1 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:13.11 -22:56:31.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 00:13:56.97 +03:17:18.9 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 13 04:19 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461173.82344271: 07:28:37.72 +22:16:33.2 Io (5.9mag) 07:28:21.96 +22:17:14.1 Europa (6.1mag) 07:28:46.70 +22:16:16.8 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:28:09.74 +22:17:48.8 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:30:24.60 +21:55:00.3 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:28:31.13 +22:16:53.1 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:30:52.34 +22:21:17.4 Elara (17.4mag) 07:29:13.57 +22:42:26.1 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:36:07.03 +22:16:51.0 Carme (18.7mag) 00:40:49.60 +01:58:33.8 Titan (8.7mag) 00:40:36.31 +01:58:40.2 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:40:30.46 +01:56:52.1 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:40:26.72 +01:58:56.9 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:41:49.45 +02:04:11.4 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 13 04:19 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461173.82344271: 17:01:22.03 -29:56:33.1 JWST 16:59:25.83 +45:29:50.0 Chandra 19:23:16.00 +00:23:21.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 13 04:19 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461173.82344271 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 67 May 13 04:19 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 13 04:19 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 13 04:19 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 16:41:22.394 +13:54:09.90 AT 2026lqp 2026-05-07.34 19.5433 13:59:13.517 -07:06:16.95 AT 2026lqo 2026-05-07.29 20.0474 16:06:17.802 +01:31:51.31 AT 2026lqn 2026-05-07.33 19.6684 19:47:24.194 +05:07:23.61 AT 2026lqm 2026-05-07.37 19.6683 16:04:43.617 +22:06:14.17 AT 2026lql 2026-05-07.33 19.8474 16:29:59.999 -11:56:47.82 AT 2026lqk 2026-05-07.34 19.7484 20:27:21.425 +83:01:37.26 AT 2026lqj 2026-05-08.31 19.889 10:36:13.003 -11:05:58.46 AT 2026lqi 2026-05-07.21 18.876 15:48:00.654 +16:46:23.35 AT 2026lqh 2026-05-06.03 20.03 14:09:34.482 +54:26:30.92 AT 2026lqg 2026-05-06.01 19.54 11:36:44.072 +07:14:34.91 AT 2026lqf 2026-05-07.27 19.909 11:50:54.655 +61:14:46.88 AT 2026lqe 2026-05-07.19 19.9549 08:08:30.782 +17:43:25.65 AT 2026lqd 2026-05-07.30 19.184 14:49:57.889 -13:06:09.83 AT 2026lqc 2026-05-07.37 19.424 12:47:29.648 +01:58:18.11 AT 2026lqb 2026-05-07.19 19.818 12:41:42.770 -17:46:00.00 AT 2026lqa 2026-05-07.67 17.69 14:59:35.556 -04:53:05.25 AT 2026lpz 2026-05-04.04 17.981 10:00:05.945 +11:34:48.39 AT 2026lpy 2026-05-02.17 19.606 09:24:01.028 +02:28:47.37 AT 2026lpx 2026-05-08.02 19.201 09:04:00.273 -08:22:58.60 AT 2026lpw 2026-05-08.02 19.371 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 13 04:19 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 87 C