Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 13.2854  2461173.7854  14.39  12:14:57.92 +63:47:15.9
129.59035  52.86644 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 1.4 pix   This object is listed in asassn_transients_list.txt    1.6"  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | SN 2026fvx                   | 12:14:57.92 +63:47:15.9 (user input)  | SN (VSX @ VizieR) | Ia (VSX @ VizieR)    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -crosshair 3795.10767 2077.49438 image    wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits -crosshair 3795.12183 2078.89038 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28543 12 14 57.92 +63 47 15.9          14.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28523 12 14 58.05 +63 47 16.1          14.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28564 12 14 57.79 +63 47 15.6          14.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 13.2854*  12 14 57.92 +63 47 15.9  14.4 U             Dra       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SN 2026fvx,2461173.7854,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SN 2026fvx 20260513.2854 14.39CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 13.2854  2461173.7854  14.94  11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3
137.73148  54.07654 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 0.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3:  16.32 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3:  16.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -crosshair 6281.23633 3788.98145 image    wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits -crosshair 6281.99170 3789.04419 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28543 11 39 33.44 +60 56 16.3          14.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28523 11 39 33.84 +60 56 13.3          15.1 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28564 11 39 33.03 +60 56 19.3          14.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 13.2854*  11 39 33.44 +60 56 16.3  14.9 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461173.7854,14.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260513.2854 14.94CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 13.2854  2461173.7854  13.96  12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2
130.14247  57.36007 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.2 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 1"  NSV 5566                      
Type: RRAB
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    14.780   R1      Y     1.310   R1        2456064.72890          0.632460000000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2:  15.00 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2:  14.87 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.93 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits


UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs   wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -crosshair 6600.80566 1886.65771 image    wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -crosshair 6455.86768 1702.33154 image    wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -crosshair 3162.37720 4729.73145 image    wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits -crosshair 3162.34155 4730.95801 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28543 12 20 55.40 +59 20 20.2          14.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28523 12 20 55.43 +59 20 19.9          14.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 13.28564 12 20 55.37 +59 20 20.5          13.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 13.2854*  12 20 55.40 +59 20 20.2  14.0 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 5566,2461173.7854,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 5566 20260513.2854 13.96CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.81413130 22.02.2026 07:32:10.944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
First image: 2461093.81413130 22.02.2026 07:32:10.944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Last  image: 2461173.78563873 13.05.2026 06:51:09.186   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  7074
Objects passed selection criteria:  7056
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5620.5
Average stars matched: 5110.5 (90.9261 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed May 13 03:39:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.81413130 22.02.2026 07:32:10.944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
First image: 2461093.81413130 22.02.2026 07:32:10.944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Last  image: 2461173.78563873 13.05.2026 06:51:09.186   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  34720
Objects passed selection criteria:  34614
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 28514
Average stars matched: 25986 (91.1342 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   134528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed May 13 03:41:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-04-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-04-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 219613 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 219613 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits_preview.png'

UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits


renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits_preview.png'

UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 460.2937
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 533.2207
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 951.2281
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 508.8794
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 951.2951
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 507.2917
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.06657
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     19.3999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 21.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-13T01:50:33.4540275' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-13T06:50:33.4540275' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61173.2851094212 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-13T06:50:43.3579416' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61173.2852240396 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     180.000444816525 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     61.9997239730566 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =              47.2375 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     327.079722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.36091434635862 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20410 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20410 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     19.3999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     19.3999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 21.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  0.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =              6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits :)

Spent 0.711114 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 42267.109959
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27349.0, right_median=33499.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     19.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 21.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-13T01:51:09.1865777' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-13T06:51:09.1865777' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61173.2855229862 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-13T06:51:19.0877646' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61173.2856375808 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     180.000444881373 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     61.9997239471458 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     47.1694444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =               327.05 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.36240687756505 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20410 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20410 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     19.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     19.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 21.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  0.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =              6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits :)

Spent 0.708989 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 42267.109959
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27349.0, right_median=33499.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits



fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.78522516
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is  605 arcmin.
The guess is  605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
The guess is  570 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Choosing aperture...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
The guess is  570 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6518 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
 
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ 

WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388    SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6454 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2073008.xyls"...
Generating wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat from image00002.cat
 
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ 

######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat from image00001.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388    SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2073009.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:56.300 +61:59:59.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 8020 stars ###
 ### Converted positions of 7898 stars ###
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2073452.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2073443.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2073008.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
  log-odds ratio 353.822 (4.60289e+153), 38 match, 0 conflict, 30 distractors, 44 index.
  RA,Dec = (180.042,61.9856), pixel scale 5.95105 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: -++++-++++++++++-++++++++++-+++-+++++---+-------------+----+--+-+--+(best)--------------------------------
Reading file "./out2073009.axy"...
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2073008.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field: out2073008.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.987946, 62.001690) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:57.107, +62:00:06.083).
Field size: 15.7273 x 10.5289 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.601 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

Inserting WCS header...  Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:39 fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K May 13 03:39 out2073008.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits)...  done!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
  log-odds ratio 449.912 (2.47819e+195), 167 match, 3 conflict, 295 distractors, 379 index.
  RA,Dec = (180.027,61.9911), pixel scale 5.93126 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ++------+++-----+++++---+++++-----+++++-+-------+++-----+++++---+++++-----+++++++-------++++-----+++
done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4112.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2073009.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2073009.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.993825, 62.001543) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:58.518, +62:00:05.555).
Field size: 15.73 x 10.5301 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.618 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

Inserting WCS header...  '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits' -> 'fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:39 fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K May 13 03:39 out2073009.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01'        / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2073008.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2073008.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6467 degrees of RA,Dec (179.986,62.0009)
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits (fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01'        / astrometry.net run
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
  log-odds ratio 353.822 (4.60289e+153), 38 match, 0 conflict, 30 distractors, 44 index.
  RA,Dec = (180.042,61.9856), pixel scale 5.95105 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: -++++-++++++++++-++++++++++-+++-+++++---+-------------+----+--+-+--+(best)--------------------------------
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2073009.xyls"...
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2073008.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2073008.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.991431, 61.999774) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:57.943, +61:59:59.187).
Field size: 15.7102 x 10.5314 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.605 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:39 fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K May 13 03:39 out2073008.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits)...  done!
done!
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2073009.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.665 degrees of RA,Dec (179.992,62.0007)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
  log-odds ratio 354.407 (8.25855e+153), 38 match, 0 conflict, 30 distractors, 44 index.
  RA,Dec = (180.041,61.9877), pixel scale 5.95104 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++++--+++++++++-++++++++++-+++-+-+++--++-+----------------+--+-+--+(best)--------------------------------
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02'        / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2073009.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2073009.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.990793, 62.001824) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:57.790, +62:00:06.567).
Field size: 15.7102 x 10.5315 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.609 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:39 fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K May 13 03:39 out2073009.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02'        / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 25934 sources.
simplexy: found 26002 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4597, 951.3] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 24.3098 (3.61072e+10), 7 match, 0 conflict, 99 distractors, 9 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0006), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: --------------------+-------+-------+----------------------+++--------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

 --> log-odds 24.3098
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 172.84 (1.15736e+75), 24 match, 0 conflict, 316 distractors, 24 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0006), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +-------------------+-------+-------+-------+------+----+--+++---------+----------+-----------------
 --> log-odds 172.84
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 392.511 (2.91946e+170), 44 match, 0 conflict, 296 distractors, 44 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0006), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +--+-------+------+-+-------+-------+-------+------++-+-+--+++---------+--+-------+-+---------------
 --> log-odds 392.511
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 956.818 (inf), 96 match, 0 conflict, 274 distractors, 97 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0006), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ++++--+-++-+--+---+-+--++-+-+-----+-+-----+++------++-+++--+++----++---+--++-----++++---+-++--+---++
 --> log-odds 956.818
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 1912.04 (inf), 193 match, 0 conflict, 646 distractors, 196 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0006), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++++++-++-++-++++++++-++-+++--++-+++-+--++++++-+++++-+++-++++++--+++-++--+++-+-+++++++++-+++-++--++
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4594, 951.295] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 23.7634 (2.09089e+10), 6 match, 0 conflict, 70 distractors, 9 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0026), pixel scale 5.96049 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ------------+-------+-------+-----------------------+--------+-------------+(best)------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)

 --> log-odds 23.7634
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 186.163 (7.07188e+80), 23 match, 0 conflict, 340 distractors, 24 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0026), pixel scale 5.96049 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +-------+---+-------+-------+-------+----+---------++--------+---------+-+++--------------------+---
 --> log-odds 1912.04
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 3646.23 (inf), 386 match, 0 conflict, 621 distractors, 390 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0006), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++-++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 --> log-odds 186.163
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 403.719 (2.15316e+175), 43 match, 0 conflict, 320 distractors, 44 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0026), pixel scale 5.96049 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +--+----+---+-------+-------+------++----+--+----++++------+-++--------+-+++--------+-----------+---
 --> log-odds 3646.23
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 6516.59 (inf), 737 match, 0 conflict, 1598 distractors, 744 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0006), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 --> log-odds 403.719
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 962.311 (inf), 96 match, 0 conflict, 274 distractors, 98 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0026), pixel scale 5.96049 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +-++-+--+--++-+----++---++++++--+--++----++++----++++--+---+-++-+--+---+-+++----+--++-+---++---++-++
 --> log-odds 962.311
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 1911.6 (inf), 193 match, 0 conflict, 638 distractors, 197 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0026), pixel scale 5.96049 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +-+++++-+-+++++--++++++-++++++--+-+++++-+++++-+--++++-+++++++++++-++++++-+++-++-+--+++++--++-+-++-++
 --> log-odds 6516.59
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 11833.3 (inf), 1449 match, 0 conflict, 4286 distractors, 1463 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0006), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 --> log-odds 1911.6
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 3647.81 (inf), 386 match, 0 conflict, 445 distractors, 392 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0026), pixel scale 5.96049 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 --> log-odds 3647.81
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 6514.48 (inf), 737 match, 0 conflict, 1613 distractors, 747 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0026), pixel scale 5.96049 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 --> log-odds 11833.3
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.991870, 62.000016) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:58.049, +62:00:00.056).
Field size: 15.7085 x 10.5297 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.61 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.new"...

 --> log-odds 6514.48
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 11830.3 (inf), 1448 match, 0 conflict, 3024 distractors, 1466 index.
  RA,Dec = (179.993,62.0026), pixel scale 5.96049 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
renamed 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Generating wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.623 +61:59:57.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 6775 stars ###
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2080536.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 --> log-odds 11830.3
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.991182, 62.002063) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:57.884, +62:00:07.425).
Field size: 15.7084 x 10.5297 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.613 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.new"...

renamed 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Generating wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.458 +62:00:04.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 6741 stars ###
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2080709.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.623 +61:59:57.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43
Second-epoch image center 11:59:57.623 +61:59:57.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.458 +62:00:04.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43
Second-epoch image center 11:59:57.458 +62:00:04.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0138 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:59:57.623 +61:59:57.10
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:57.458 +62:00:04.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00207 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ureycoKHNn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NCVKeL1079
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O1PeEo8yYo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EGfW164R96
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 161.7657 to 199.8673 deg, Dec +55.1060 to +67.5518 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 161.7657 to 199.8673 deg, Dec 55.1060 to 67.5518 deg
Loaded 6658 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3980 out of 4151 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4151 out of 8020 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.962150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.962150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.49

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.49

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 161.7657 to 199.8673 deg, Dec +55.1060 to +67.5518 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 161.7657 to 199.8673 deg, Dec 55.1060 to 67.5518 deg
Loaded 6658 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3980 out of 4151 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4151 out of 8020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 160.7334 to 199.4568 deg, Dec +55.8733 to +67.2738 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 160.7334 to 199.4568 deg, Dec 55.8733 to 67.2738 deg
Loaded 6167 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3997 out of 4157 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4157 out of 7898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.2 (SNR )  12.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ureycoKHNn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, passed=8020
Got 8020 stars (including 7524 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.1 to 67.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.1 to 67.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=244 n_q2=240 n_q3=262 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NCVKeL1079 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=7898
Got 7898 stars (including 7427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=239 n_q2=243 n_q3=263 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O1PeEo8yYo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=397, passed=6775
Got 6775 stars (including 6372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=232 n_q2=297 n_q3=199 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.310
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EGfW164R96 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6741
Got 6741 stars (including 6353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6741 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=234 n_q2=296 n_q3=199 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is  605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is  605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
The guess is  570 arcmin.
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits was not found.
The guess is  570 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Generating wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.458 +62:00:04.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.623 +61:59:57.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:56.300 +61:59:59.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.8'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 32448 stars ###
 ### Converted positions of 32482 stars ###
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
 ### Converted positions of 36817 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2330143.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
 ### Converted positions of 37529 stars ###
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2330192.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2330335.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2330436.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.623 +61:59:57.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43
Second-epoch image center 11:59:57.623 +61:59:57.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.458 +62:00:04.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43
Second-epoch image center 11:59:57.458 +62:00:04.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0138 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:59:57.623 +61:59:57.10
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:57.458 +62:00:04.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00207 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4dQkcsAXee
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b5r6iL4mzo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S93aPRfUx9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yPPY4f6bzH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 161.7326 to 200.0177 deg, Dec +55.1060 to +67.5533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 161.7326 to 200.0177 deg, Dec 55.1060 to 67.5533 deg
Loaded 6693 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3759 out of 4152 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4152 out of 37529 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.853800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.853800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.65

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.65

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 161.7326 to 200.0177 deg, Dec +55.1060 to +67.5533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 161.7326 to 200.0177 deg, Dec 55.1060 to 67.5533 deg
Loaded 6693 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3759 out of 4152 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4152 out of 37529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 36817 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 160.6955 to 199.6809 deg, Dec +55.8734 to +67.2780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 160.6955 to 199.6809 deg, Dec 55.8734 to 67.2780 deg
Loaded 6206 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3781 out of 4157 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4157 out of 36817 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
 2.3 pix  UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.7 mag.  UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
 15.6 mag.  UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 15.4 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
 15.4 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.4 (SNR )  14.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4dQkcsAXee (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1970, passed=37515
Got 37515 stars (including 35501 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.1 to 67.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.1 to 67.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=245 n_q2=242 n_q3=256 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b5r6iL4mzo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1641, passed=36812
Got 36812 stars (including 35126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=236 n_q2=246 n_q3=261 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S93aPRfUx9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1517, passed=32465
Got 32465 stars (including 30914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32465 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=233 n_q2=290 n_q3=205 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yPPY4f6bzH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1437, passed=32436
Got 32436 stars (including 30952 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32436 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=234 n_q2=289 n_q3=207 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 12:09:25.23 +60:15:36.6:  14.59 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 12:15:13.59 +59:30:20.6:  14.34 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 12:12:58.19 +61:07:02.6:  13.70 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 12:12:58.19 +61:07:02.6:  13.71 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 12:15:13.59 +59:30:20.6:  14.46 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:58.19 +61:07:02.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.5210 delta=-0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:15:13.59 +59:30:20.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5927 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 12:09:25.23 +60:15:36.6:  14.38 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:09:25.23 +60:15:36.6: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6342 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 11:25:54.44 +65:16:59.6:  14.27 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 11:25:54.44 +65:16:59.6:  14.35 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3:  16.32 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:54.44 +65:16:59.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6267 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2:  15.00 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3:  16.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2:  14.87 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.93 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9593 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58962.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 52796_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 13.28523    2461173.78523    14.79    12:09:25.23 +60:15:36.2   4073 4229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.57    12:09:25.24 +60:15:37.1   4073 4230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52798_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 52798_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 13.28523    2461173.78523    14.66    12:12:58.21 +61:07:01.5   3837 3698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.45    12:12:58.17 +61:07:03.7   3837 3699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 52802_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 13.28523    2461173.78523    14.60    12:15:13.64 +59:30:20.2   3608 4661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.58    12:15:13.54 +59:30:21.0   3608 4663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 52803_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.46    11:35:10.99 +58:01:49.6   6760 5523   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  11:35:10.96 +58:01:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 52809_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.50    11:28:34.90 +60:31:55.8   7115 3960   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  11:28:34.90 +60:31:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 52812_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.25    12:34:58.97 +64:06:00.1   2488 1750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  12:34:58.92 +64:06:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53319_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 53319_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    11.47    11:24:19.65 +64:28:57.2   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53529_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 53529_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    11.93    11:25:59.72 +65:26:32.7   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 54309_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    12.89    11:45:01.63 +64:47:37.2   5762 1484   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  11:45:01.61 +64:47:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54590_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 54590_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    12.82    11:42:59.28 +59:11:22.1   6092 4863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  11:42:59.31 +59:11:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55061_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55061_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.30    11:28:26.76 +59:07:04.9   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55106_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55106_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.45    12:00:10.81 +62:09:53.8   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55186_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55186_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.53    11:58:21.28 +61:26:10.9   4902 3537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  11:58:21.26 +61:26:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55391_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55391_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.64    11:34:37.55 +63:46:12.0   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55526_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55526_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.50    12:24:44.29 +57:52:42.3   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55658_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55658_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.68    11:23:34.42 +61:37:46.0   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55739_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55739_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.85    12:22:23.70 +63:06:36.4   3262 2447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  12:22:23.65 +63:06:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55808_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55808_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.83    11:32:39.32 +58:14:44.1   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55979_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 55979_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    13.94    12:20:47.98 +62:20:15.5   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56248_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 56248_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.22    11:35:38.83 +62:38:15.9   6479 2742   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  11:35:38.84 +62:38:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56557_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 56557_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.08    12:46:21.85 +65:13:14.3   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56713_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 56713_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.50    11:31:10.90 +59:42:57.8   6973 4473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  11:31:10.90 +59:42:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56762_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 56762_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.13    12:14:59.82 +64:36:32.3   3825 1582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  12:14:59.83 +64:36:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56886_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 56886_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.51    12:08:13.33 +63:45:35.8   4244 2119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  12:08:13.38 +63:45:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56915_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 56915_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.31    12:25:58.70 +62:11:15.5   2958 2978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  12:25:58.68 +62:11:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56940_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 56940_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.40    11:34:20.46 +59:37:06.3   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56966_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 56966_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.21    12:43:18.92 +65:23:56.8   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57011_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
Preparing report for the candidate 57011_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57201_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57201_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.28    12:11:11.88 +58:27:34.9   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57387_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57387_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.54    11:31:51.53 +65:44:49.4   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57510_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57510_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.50    11:31:17.34 +63:24:21.7   6733 2250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

**** FOUND  11:31:17.39 +63:24:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57597_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57597_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 13.28523    2461173.78523    14.63    11:25:54.48 +65:17:00.2   6957 1075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-50-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.63    11:25:54.40 +65:16:59.1   6957 1077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57617_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57617_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.38    12:03:48.79 +58:02:01.6   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57880_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57880_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.76    11:33:45.43 +59:26:22.8   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57901_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57901_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.27    12:35:00.69 +61:12:13.5   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57920_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57920_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.70    12:26:48.07 +65:57:32.4   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57924_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57924_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.68    12:07:54.31 +57:54:12.7   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57978_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 57978_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.32    12:13:50.27 +57:48:21.8   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58025_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 58025_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    15.15    11:20:32.58 +63:15:04.8   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58162_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 58162_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.35    12:31:41.75 +60:37:08.3   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58210_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 58210_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.73    12:26:43.60 +65:44:19.1   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 58326_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.55    12:13:11.28 +62:32:04.3   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58431_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 58431_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.56    12:21:30.44 +59:44:11.2   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58455_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 58455_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.59    11:52:25.30 +59:00:19.0   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58474_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 58474_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.74    11:26:33.86 +59:19:14.4   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58717_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 58717_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.93    11:42:47.93 +58:03:55.7   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58962_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
Preparing report for the candidate 58962_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59052_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
The candidate 59052_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 13.28564    2461173.78564    14.83    11:43:09.82 +58:00:14.4   6121 5583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_033142_TTUQ2b1x1_1463760_t123wJnT/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10146_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
Preparing report for the candidate 10146_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0242
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2
11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3
########### Completed UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
12:14:57.92 +63:47:15.9
11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3
12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2
###################################################################################
12:14:57.92 +63:47:15.9  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:14:57.92 +63:47:15.9  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3  -- not a known variable star
12:14:57.92 +63:47:15.9  -- a known object
12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2  -- a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
3 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
11:39:33.44 +60:56:16.3
12:14:57.92 +63:47:15.9
12:20:55.40 +59:20:20.2
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461173.78522516 -observatory V36
03:12:39.01 +17:48:44.1 Mercury (-2.2mag)
05:27:59.62 +24:37:57.2 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:35:12.15 +09:04:08.6 Mars (1.2mag)
07:28:30.82 +22:16:51.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:40:36.88 +01:58:35.2 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:53:56.18 +20:06:55.8 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:14:02.81 +00:04:29.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:13.13 -22:56:30.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
00:11:35.86 +03:01:59.3 Moon (-9.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 13 03:39 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461173.78522516:
07:28:36.83 +22:16:35.0 Io (5.9mag)
07:28:20.53 +22:17:16.9 Europa (6.1mag)
07:28:44.68 +22:16:21.3 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:28:07.83 +22:17:52.8 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:30:23.14 +21:55:04.2 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:28:28.55 +22:16:58.7 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:30:50.89 +22:21:22.0 Elara (17.4mag)
07:29:11.82 +22:42:30.7 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:36:05.50 +22:16:54.2 Carme (18.7mag)
00:40:48.67 +01:58:28.3 Titan (8.7mag)
00:40:35.20 +01:58:35.5 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:40:29.47 +01:56:46.6 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:40:25.87 +01:58:52.0 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:41:48.60 +02:04:06.5 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 13 03:39 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461173.78522516:
17:01:29.53 -29:55:21.5 JWST
16:57:17.30 +46:04:16.0 Chandra
18:59:39.61 -12:36:24.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 13 03:39 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461173.78522516 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 67 May 13 03:39 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.12 16.24
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80    2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80    2026-05-9.06 17.5
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50  ASASSN-26by  2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60  SN2026fjc  2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20  ASASSN-26bv  2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40  ASASSN-26bt  2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10  ASASSN-26bu  2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00  SN 2026eza  2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90  AT2026fsf  2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30  SN 2026enn  2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00  AT 2026ezy  2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30  ASASSN-26bs  2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20  ASASSN-26br  2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40  AT 2023uk  2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10  AT2026fhw  2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10  SN2026drr  2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90  ASASSN-26bo  2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40  SN2026ebt  2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50  SN2026ehe  2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70  SN2026efq  2026-03-12.16 0.06
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 13 03:39 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1  TCP J07032576-1241401  2026-03-10.4268  15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8  PNV J00423682+4116058  2026-03-12.5744  17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1  TCP J07264579-2745141  2026-03-17.4417  14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 13 03:39 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:41:22.394 +13:54:09.90  AT 2026lqp  2026-05-07.34 19.5433
13:59:13.517 -07:06:16.95  AT 2026lqo  2026-05-07.29 20.0474
16:06:17.802 +01:31:51.31  AT 2026lqn  2026-05-07.33 19.6684
19:47:24.194 +05:07:23.61  AT 2026lqm  2026-05-07.37 19.6683
16:04:43.617 +22:06:14.17  AT 2026lql  2026-05-07.33 19.8474
16:29:59.999 -11:56:47.82  AT 2026lqk  2026-05-07.34 19.7484
20:27:21.425 +83:01:37.26  AT 2026lqj  2026-05-08.31 19.889
10:36:13.003 -11:05:58.46  AT 2026lqi  2026-05-07.21 18.876
15:48:00.654 +16:46:23.35  AT 2026lqh  2026-05-06.03 20.03
14:09:34.482 +54:26:30.92  AT 2026lqg  2026-05-06.01 19.54
11:36:44.072 +07:14:34.91  AT 2026lqf  2026-05-07.27 19.909
11:50:54.655 +61:14:46.88  AT 2026lqe  2026-05-07.19 19.9549
08:08:30.782 +17:43:25.65  AT 2026lqd  2026-05-07.30 19.184
14:49:57.889 -13:06:09.83  AT 2026lqc  2026-05-07.37 19.424
12:47:29.648 +01:58:18.11  AT 2026lqb  2026-05-07.19 19.818
12:41:42.770 -17:46:00.00  AT 2026lqa  2026-05-07.67 17.69
14:59:35.556 -04:53:05.25  AT 2026lpz  2026-05-04.04 17.981
10:00:05.945 +11:34:48.39  AT 2026lpy  2026-05-02.17 19.606
09:24:01.028 +02:28:47.37  AT 2026lpx  2026-05-08.02 19.201
09:04:00.273 -08:22:58.60  AT 2026lpw  2026-05-08.02 19.371
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 13 03:39 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed May 13 03:38:56 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 30s (0.50 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 40s (0.67 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 77s (1.28 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 12 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 3 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 26s (0.43 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 65s (1.08 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 2s (0.03 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 20s (0.33 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 116s (1.93 min)
FIELD_UMa-04-Q2b1x1: 209s (3.48 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 217s (3.62 min)
Finished: Wed May 13 03:42:33 CDT 2026