This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2917 2461173.7917 14.16 14:42:48.87 -01:49:30.5
350.19533 50.53604 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 1 -1 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:42:48.87 -01:49:30.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:42:48.87 -01:49:30.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2917* 14 42 48.87 -01 49 30.5 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7917,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2917 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2917 2461173.7917 14.28 14:53:41.27 +01:30:01.1
356.93960 51.07989 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 2 0 2 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:41.27 +01:30:01.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:41.27 +01:30:01.1: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2917* 14 53 41.27 +01 30 01.1 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7917,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2917 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2917 2461173.7917 14.35 14:33:19.31 -05:13:59.6
344.02045 49.33606 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1107 Lictoria 2 0 2 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:19.31 -05:13:59.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:33:19.31 -05:13:59.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2917* 14 33 19.31 -05 13 59.6 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7917,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2917 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2917 2461173.7917 14.50 14:47:59.85 -02:44:02.3
350.78119 49.00009 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.598 Octavia 1 1 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:47:59.85 -02:44:02.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:47:59.85 -02:44:02.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7917,14.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2917 14.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2917 2461173.7917 14.62 14:30:12.30 -02:30:51.1
345.58942 51.98354 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3002 Delasalle 2 -1 2 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:30:12.30 -02:30:51.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:30:12.30 -02:30:51.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2917* 14 30 12.30 -02 30 51.1 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7917,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2917 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2917 2461173.7917 14.97 14:28:56.15 +02:38:53.9
350.73478 56.18763 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.986 Amelia 2 1 2 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:28:56.15 +02:38:53.9: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:28:56.15 +02:38:53.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2917* 14 28 56.15 +02 38 53.9 15.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7917,14.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2917 14.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461173.79196470 13.05.2026 07:00:15.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7128
Objects passed selection criteria: 7126
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6853.25
Average stars matched: 6565 (95.794 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 03:25:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461173.79196470 13.05.2026 07:00:15.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 101
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39268
Objects passed selection criteria: 39200
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38149.8
Average stars matched: 36974.5 (96.9194 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141032 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 03:27:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.79135719
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is 605 arcmin.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6674 high-SNR stars for plate solving
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6669 high-SNR stars for plate solving
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat from image00002.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out978162.xyls"...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits created.
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat from image00001.cat
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out978160.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6865 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky978611.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.294 -02:00:52.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6283 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky978567.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out978162.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 129.525 (1.7865e+56), 11 match, 0 conflict, 6 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (218.533,-2.00294), pixel scale 5.97417 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++++-+-+---+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4117.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out978162.solved to indicate this.
Field: out978162.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.541274, -2.000965) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:09.906, -02:00:03.473).
Field size: 15.793 x 10.5715 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.301 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out978160.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:25 fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 03:25 out978162.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits)... done!
log-odds ratio 129.645 (2.01448e+56), 11 match, 0 conflict, 5 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (218.519,-2.003), pixel scale 5.97413 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++-+-+--+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4117.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out978160.solved to indicate this.
Field: out978160.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.527699, -2.000929) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:06.648, -02:00:03.345).
Field size: 15.7931 x 10.5713 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.301 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:25 fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 03:25 out978160.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out978160.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out978162.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out978160.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7217 degrees of RA,Dec (218.527,-2.0017)
log-odds ratio 48.8502 (1.64205e+21), 9 match, 0 conflict, 17 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.531,-2.00504), pixel scale 5.96442 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++---+--+-++----+---+-+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out978160.solved to indicate this.
Field: out978160.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.528146, -2.002980) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:06.755, -02:00:10.730).
Field size: 15.7623 x 10.5025 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.271 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:25 fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 03:25 out978160.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits)... done!
done!
Reading file "./out978162.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7217 degrees of RA,Dec (218.54,-2.00174)
log-odds ratio 49.7301 (3.95827e+21), 9 match, 0 conflict, 17 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.545,-2.00505), pixel scale 5.96445 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++---+--+-+++-------+-+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out978162.solved to indicate this.
Field: out978162.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.541701, -2.002974) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:10.008, -02:00:10.707).
Field size: 15.7622 x 10.5027 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.271 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:25 fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 03:25 out978162.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 29086 sources.
simplexy: found 29158 sources.
Solving...
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5117, 952.08] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 7.9023
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 72.7332 (3.86926e+31), 19 match, 0 conflict, 209 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-2.00221), pixel scale 5.96541 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-----------------------+-----+---+------------+-----------+---------------------------+-------++
--> log-odds 72.7332
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 151.464 (6.02497e+65), 29 match, 0 conflict, 199 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-2.00221), pixel scale 5.96541 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+------++--+----+-------+-----+---+------------+-----------+---------------------------+-------++
--> log-odds 151.464
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 431.346 (2.14397e+187), 60 match, 0 conflict, 241 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-2.00221), pixel scale 5.96541 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+--+---++--+---++-------+-----++--+------+-----+---------+-+-----+-------------+-+-----+-------++
--> log-odds 431.346
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 944.847 (inf), 125 match, 0 conflict, 232 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-2.00221), pixel scale 5.96541 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--++--++-++--+++--+--+-+-+---+++++-----++-----+++-+---+++++----++-+---++--+---+++-+---+------+++
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5125, 952.091] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 66 (4.60708e+28), 21 match, 0 conflict, 287 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.543,-2.0022), pixel scale 5.96548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-----+--------------------------+---+-+------------------+-------------------------------------
--> log-odds 66
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 142.381 (6.84637e+61), 31 match, 0 conflict, 240 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (218.543,-2.0022), pixel scale 5.96548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+-----+---+---+------------------+---+-+------------------+-------------------------------------
--> log-odds 142.381
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 432.403 (6.16677e+187), 61 match, 0 conflict, 247 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (218.543,-2.0022), pixel scale 5.96548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+--+---+---+-------+---------++---+-+----------------+-+---+-+------+------+-+-------------+-
--> log-odds 432.403
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 944.589 (inf), 124 match, 0 conflict, 195 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (218.543,-2.0022), pixel scale 5.96548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++-+--++--+---+---+---+--+----+-++---+-++----++-+-+---+++-+---+++-+--+++------+++++----++-+---++
--> log-odds 944.589
--> log-odds 944.847
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1729.43 (inf), 237 match, 0 conflict, 295 distractors, 379 index.
RA,Dec = (218.543,-2.0022), pixel scale 5.96548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++-+-++++-+---++--+---++++----+-++---++++-+--++-+-+---+++-+--++++-+--++++----++++++---+++-+--+++
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1728.77 (inf), 239 match, 0 conflict, 336 distractors, 379 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-2.00221), pixel scale 5.96541 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--++-+++-++--+++-++--+-+++---+++++---+-++-+---+++-+--++++++---+++-+---+++-+---+++-+--++++-+--+++
--> log-odds 1729.43
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1728.77
log-odds ratio 2977.83 (inf), 461 match, 0 conflict, 714 distractors, 739 index.
RA,Dec = (218.543,-2.0022), pixel scale 5.96548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++-+-++++-+--+++--+---++++----+-++---++++-+--++-+-+---+++++--++++-+--++++-+--++++-+---+++-+--+++
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2952.22 (inf), 454 match, 0 conflict, 672 distractors, 738 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-2.00221), pixel scale 5.96541 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-++-+++-++--+++-++--+-+++---+++++---+-++-+---+++-+--++++-+---+++-+---+++-+---+++-+--++++-+--+++
--> log-odds 2977.83
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5266.71 (inf), 893 match, 0 conflict, 1447 distractors, 1476 index.
RA,Dec = (218.543,-2.0022), pixel scale 5.96548 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++-+-++++-+--+++--+---++++----+-++---++++-+--++-+-+---+++++--++++-+--++++-+--++++-+---+++-+--+++
--> log-odds 2952.22
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5252.3 (inf), 890 match, 0 conflict, 1442 distractors, 1475 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-2.00221), pixel scale 5.96541 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-++-+++-++--+++-++--+-+++---+++++---+-++-+---+++-+--++++-+---+++-+---+++-+---+++-+--++++-+--+++
--> log-odds 5266.71
--> log-odds 5252.3
Got 7 solutions.
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.541515, -2.000782) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:09.964, -02:00:02.817).
Field size: 15.7682 x 10.573 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.315 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.new"...
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.527951, -2.000773) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:06.708, -02:00:02.781).
Field size: 15.7682 x 10.5729 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.315 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:06.496 -02:00:05.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:09.752 -02:00:05.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7248 stars ###
### Converted positions of 7277 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky993166.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky993163.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:06.496 -02:00:05.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:06.496 -02:00:05.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0733 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:09.752 -02:00:05.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:09.752 -02:00:05.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0598 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:06.496 -02:00:05.57
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:09.752 -02:00:05.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01356 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KxsaHwDcms
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PX7DBT2Zs0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NkvPjyBuvA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L0swVjDb1b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to +3.3059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to 3.3059 deg
Loaded 4006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3333 out of 3439 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3439 out of 6283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.9 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
2.9 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KxsaHwDcms (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PX7DBT2Zs0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=6283
Got 6283 stars (including 5846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.596 n_q1=260 n_q2=206 n_q3=204 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.404
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NkvPjyBuvA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=359, passed=7248
Got 7248 stars (including 6882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7248 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=275 n_q2=188 n_q3=212 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L0swVjDb1b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=7277
Got 7277 stars (including 6900 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=278 n_q2=188 n_q3=208 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:02.79 -04:26:09.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:39:30.23 -00:34:28.5: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:16:27.17 +01:45:17.3: 11.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:37:20.03 -00:29:54.8: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:07.24 -00:32:23.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:27.75 -00:50:40.9: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:37:20.03 -00:29:54.8: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:16:27.17 +01:45:17.3: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:33:07.24 -00:32:23.6: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:20.03 -00:29:54.8: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3092 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:27.17 +01:45:17.3: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4735 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:07.24 -00:32:23.6: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2007 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:27.75 -00:50:40.9: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:39:30.23 -00:34:28.5: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:02.79 -04:26:09.7: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:27.75 -00:50:40.9: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2996 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:30.23 -00:34:28.5: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2724 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:02.79 -04:26:09.7: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2872 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 20419_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20438_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 20438_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20443_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 20443_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 20444_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 20445_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20446_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 20446_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:06.496 -02:00:05.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:09.752 -02:00:05.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.294 -02:00:52.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 37351 stars ###
### Converted positions of 36035 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 37240 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1147867.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1147916.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1147874.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
### Converted positions of 43198 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1147944.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:06.496 -02:00:05.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:06.496 -02:00:05.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0733 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:09.752 -02:00:05.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:09.752 -02:00:05.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0598 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:06.496 -02:00:05.57
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:09.752 -02:00:05.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01356 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.20YWBFyn7i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9eKAzro7g2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4l4q4bQsnJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AyvcVJk67P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.725950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.725950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 36035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to +3.3190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to 3.3190 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3249 out of 3501 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3501 out of 36035 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.7 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
2.7 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.20YWBFyn7i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1997, passed=43167
Got 43167 stars (including 41100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=265 n_q2=181 n_q3=216 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9eKAzro7g2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1833, passed=36030
Got 36030 stars (including 34148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36030 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.608 n_q1=271 n_q2=194 n_q3=212 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.426
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4l4q4bQsnJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1381, passed=37336
Got 37336 stars (including 35903 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=279 n_q2=184 n_q3=212 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AyvcVJk67P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1341, passed=37233
Got 37233 stars (including 35828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=283 n_q2=179 n_q3=213 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0237.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_031811_TTUQ1b1x1_379747_oa4ZyxWy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:52.04 -04:32:26.9: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:22:28.65 +00:49:04.6: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:52.58 -03:30:29.0: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:07.19 -05:28:33.8: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:42:34.59 -03:33:18.3: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:15.92 -00:57:29.6: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:11:42.05 +00:29:48.0: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:22.25 -02:17:56.6: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:52.04 -04:32:26.9: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:52.58 -03:30:29.0: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:07.19 -05:28:33.8: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:42:34.59 -03:33:18.3: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:52.04 -04:32:26.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8929 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:22:28.65 +00:49:04.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:52.58 -03:30:29.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6696 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:15.92 -00:57:29.6: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:11:42.05 +00:29:48.0: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:22.25 -02:17:56.6: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:07.19 -05:28:33.8: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5232 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:34.59 -03:33:18.3: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6375 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:22:28.65 +00:49:04.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4264 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:15.92 -00:57:29.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8543 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:42.05 +00:29:48.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4615 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:22.25 -02:17:56.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2082 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:14.79 -03:53:03.6: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:03:34.52 -01:44:00.3: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:14.79 -03:53:03.6: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:14.79 -03:53:03.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9519 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:03:34.52 -01:44:00.3: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:34.52 -01:44:00.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3542 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:41.27 +01:30:01.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:42:48.87 -01:49:30.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:03:03.26 -03:27:06.9: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:19.31 -05:13:59.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:43.24 -02:20:36.9: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:05.64 -05:17:17.8: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:11:38.13 -01:09:35.7: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:18:27.93 -06:50:29.7: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:11:38.13 -01:09:35.7: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:33:19.31 -05:13:59.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:43.24 -02:20:36.9: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:41.27 +01:30:01.1: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:42:48.87 -01:49:30.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:03:03.26 -03:27:06.9: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:38.13 -01:09:35.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3493 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:05.64 -05:17:17.8: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:18:27.93 -06:50:29.7: 14.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:43.24 -02:20:36.9: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4718 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:03.26 -03:27:06.9: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4544 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:05.64 -05:17:17.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5386 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:27.93 -06:50:29.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2618 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:04:13.09 -04:39:41.8: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:57.60 -02:19:56.2: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:04:13.09 -04:39:41.8: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:13.09 -04:39:41.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4382 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:57.60 -02:19:56.2: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:57.60 -02:19:56.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5277 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:24:10.54 -04:36:11.1: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:17.49 -05:44:24.3: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:52.52 -05:42:26.1: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:15.89 -00:54:25.8: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:47:59.85 -02:44:02.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:17.49 -05:44:24.3: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:24:10.54 -04:36:11.1: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:52.52 -05:42:26.1: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:10.54 -04:36:11.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5112 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:17.49 -05:44:24.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4909 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:52.52 -05:42:26.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4035 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:18.73 -06:18:41.2: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:30:12.30 -02:30:51.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:47:59.85 -02:44:02.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:15.89 -00:54:25.8: 14.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:15.89 -00:54:25.8: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4197 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:18.73 -06:18:41.2: 15.36 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:18.73 -06:18:41.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5882 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:30:12.30 -02:30:51.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:53.94 -04:17:01.8: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:04:15.48 +02:27:55.3: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:04:33.46 +02:45:09.5: 15.35 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:15.56 -07:01:03.7: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:04:33.46 +02:45:09.5: 15.25 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:04:15.48 +02:27:55.3: 14.99 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:53.94 -04:17:01.8: 15.33 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:33.46 +02:45:09.5: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6625 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:53.94 -04:17:01.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7093 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:15.48 +02:27:55.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6736 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:06:19.73 +03:09:52.3: 14.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:06:19.73 +03:09:52.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:19.73 +03:09:52.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:15.56 -07:01:03.7: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:15.56 -07:01:03.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4941 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:53.89 -00:44:02.5: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:04.73 -02:06:36.9: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:15:21.46 +03:05:27.1: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:08:43.20 +02:14:13.1: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:05:28.75 +01:27:01.6: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:04.73 -02:06:36.9: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:53.89 -00:44:02.5: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:15:21.46 +03:05:27.1: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:04.73 -02:06:36.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7227 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:53.89 -00:44:02.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7649 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:15:21.46 +03:05:27.1: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7742 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:08:43.20 +02:14:13.1: 15.12 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:43.20 +02:14:13.1: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7726 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:05:28.75 +01:27:01.6: 15.66 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:28.75 +01:27:01.6: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7771 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:13:18.76 +03:15:27.2: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:21:21.20 -06:30:11.0: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:43.43 -00:46:39.6: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:13:18.76 +03:15:27.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:18.76 +03:15:27.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:54.07 -00:38:16.0: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:05:21.93 -00:07:00.1: 15.29 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:21:21.20 -06:30:11.0: 15.12 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:43.43 -00:46:39.6: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:21.20 -06:30:11.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7092 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:43.43 -00:46:39.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8255 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:54.07 -00:38:16.0: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:54.07 -00:38:16.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7300 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:05:21.93 -00:07:00.1: 14.79 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:21.93 -00:07:00.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7086 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:15:45.39 +01:05:29.4: 15.46 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:34.57 +00:06:26.8: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:07:03.94 -06:17:27.2: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:15:45.39 +01:05:29.4: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:15:45.39 +01:05:29.4: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8552 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:09:43.20 -04:53:05.6: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:26.88 -03:53:30.9: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:34.57 +00:06:26.8: 15.35 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:07:03.94 -06:17:27.2: 15.45 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:34.57 +00:06:26.8: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7001 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:03.94 -06:17:27.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6257 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:09:43.20 -04:53:05.6: 15.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:43.20 -04:53:05.6: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5623 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:26.88 -03:53:30.9: 14.85 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:26.88 -03:53:30.9: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6718 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:47:55.90 +01:43:18.0: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:10.72 -02:49:05.2: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:30:45.85 +00:02:13.5: 15.76 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:47:55.90 +01:43:18.0: 15.12 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:55.90 +01:43:18.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8686 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:10:42.91 -05:37:39.7: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:24.13 +02:31:29.6: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:30:45.85 +00:02:13.5: 15.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:45.85 +00:02:13.5: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8469 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:10.72 -02:49:05.2: 15.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:10.72 -02:49:05.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7750 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:10:42.91 -05:37:39.7: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:42.91 -05:37:39.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7254 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:24.13 +02:31:29.6: 15.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:24.13 +02:31:29.6: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8868 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:33.75 -04:34:21.2: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:22.40 -02:07:51.5: 15.36 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:33.75 -04:34:21.2: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:32.61 -05:56:22.8: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:33.75 -04:34:21.2: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7490 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:02.41 +00:14:37.6: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:14.95 +01:38:36.0: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:22.40 -02:07:51.5: 15.31 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:22.40 -02:07:51.5: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8323 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:32.61 -05:56:22.8: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:32.61 -05:56:22.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7339 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:02.41 +00:14:37.6: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:02.41 +00:14:37.6: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7490 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:14.95 +01:38:36.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:14.95 +01:38:36.0: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.9465 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:53.37 +01:49:16.1: 15.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:14:59.59 -03:33:30.4: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:53.37 +01:49:16.1: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:53.37 +01:49:16.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8528 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:34.57 +02:34:29.0: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:23.46 -00:50:49.8: 15.62 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:03:45.01 +00:47:06.5: 15.45 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:14:59.59 -03:33:30.4: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:14:59.59 -03:33:30.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7838 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:33:34.57 +02:34:29.0: 15.48 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:34.57 +02:34:29.0: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9574 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:23.46 -00:50:49.8: 15.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:03:45.01 +00:47:06.5: 15.41 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:12.08 -00:58:47.9: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:23.46 -00:50:49.8: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.9084 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:45.01 +00:47:06.5: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.7744 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:12.08 -00:58:47.9: 15.25 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:30.06 -05:37:45.3: 15.54 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:12.08 -00:58:47.9: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8395 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:36:05.33 -04:24:48.5: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:24.60 -06:48:18.9: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:33:30.06 -05:37:45.3: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:30.06 -05:37:45.3: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8288 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:36:05.33 -04:24:48.5: 15.58 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:05.33 -04:24:48.5: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9371 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:54.00 -00:10:31.7: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:28:56.15 +02:38:53.9: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:24.60 -06:48:18.9: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:24.60 -06:48:18.9: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7446 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:54.00 -00:10:31.7: 15.24 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:54.00 -00:10:31.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9203 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:28:56.15 +02:38:53.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:09:12.41 +01:41:52.2: 15.51 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:36:02.00 +02:51:06.6: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:14:22.81 +00:21:37.6: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:36.24 -06:22:09.1: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:09:12.41 +01:41:52.2: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:12.41 +01:41:52.2: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7632 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:36:02.00 +02:51:06.6: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:02.00 +02:51:06.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8977 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:40:57.45 -05:37:35.8: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:14:22.81 +00:21:37.6: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:14:22.81 +00:21:37.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7391 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:36.24 -06:22:09.1: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:36.24 -06:22:09.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6307 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:40:57.45 -05:37:35.8: 15.37 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:57.45 -05:37:35.8: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9187 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:04:47.36 +01:59:48.0: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:04:47.36 +01:59:48.0: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:47.36 +01:59:48.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5308 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52990.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53010.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53057.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53065.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53292.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52791_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52794_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52796_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52800_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52805_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52805_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52806_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52865_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52887_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52887_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:09.86 -07:16:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52903_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52903_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:50.04 +02:33:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52919_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52919_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52931_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:54.80 -04:57:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52939_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:08:58.43 -06:09:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52941_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52941_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52986_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 52986_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52990_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
Preparing report for the candidate 52990_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
Preparing report for the candidate 52991_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53005_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
Preparing report for the candidate 53010_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53022_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53025_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53026_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53029_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53029_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53034_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53037_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53041_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53043_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:20.44 -06:28:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53046_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53049_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:59.08 -06:17:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53052_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53052_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53055_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53055_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53057_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
Preparing report for the candidate 53057_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53060_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
Preparing report for the candidate 53065_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53069_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53070_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53070_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53076_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53076_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53090_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53099_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53099_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53101_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:43.45 +02:13:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53106_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53106_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53114_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53114_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53119_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53119_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53123_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53123_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53136_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53139_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53139_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53144_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53144_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53152_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53152_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53156_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53156_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53158_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53158_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53160_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53160_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53161_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53161_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53164_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53164_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53172_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53172_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53185_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53203_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53203_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53209_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53211_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53211_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53215_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53215_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53218_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53218_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53221_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53221_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53223_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53223_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53227_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53230_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53233_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53233_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53237_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53237_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53238_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53239_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53239_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53246_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53246_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53251_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53251_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53256_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53256_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53261_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53268_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53268_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53281_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:15:05.80 +02:49:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53282_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53282_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53289_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53289_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53292_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
Preparing report for the candidate 53292_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53295_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53304_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53304_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53308_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53308_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53337_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53337_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53347_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 53347_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50075_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 50075_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:05:56.66 +02:34:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50051_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 50051_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:31.37 -05:21:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50023_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238
The candidate 50023_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-00-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0238 did not pass the final checks
