This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3166 2461173.8166 12.80 15:27:07.98 +17:42:16.1
26.51698 52.96520 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.148 Gallia 1 -0 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:27:07.98 +17:42:16.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:27:07.98 +17:42:16.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.3166* 15 27 07.98 +17 42 16.1 12.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.8166,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.3166 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3166 2461173.8166 14.99 14:47:51.73 +18:37:29.8
21.48937 61.94617 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:47:51.73 +18:37:29.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:47:51.73 +18:37:29.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:47:51.73 +18:37:29.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461173.8166,14.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260513.3166 14.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3166 2461173.8166 13.20 15:03:17.42 +14:17:36.8
16.95005 56.73900 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 10562210
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.210 V 14.200 V 2454976.90000 0.618577500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:03:17.42 +14:17:36.8: 14.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:03:17.42 +14:17:36.8: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 10562210,2461173.8166,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 10562210 20260513.3166 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3166 2461173.8166 12.93 15:08:25.81 +09:36:19.6
11.02595 53.26827 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" FV Boo
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.000 V < 15.100 V 2454178.00000 313.000000000000 M9III
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:08:25.81 +09:36:19.6: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:08:25.81 +09:36:19.6: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FV Boo,2461173.8166,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FV Boo 20260513.3166 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.3166 2461173.8166 10.61 15:21:39.53 +14:18:52.9
20.49809 52.78651 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" S Ser
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.500 V 14.000 V 2450616.00000 370.400000000000 M5e-M6e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:21:39.53 +14:18:52.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:21:39.53 +14:18:52.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.3166* 15 21 39.53 +14 18 52.9 10.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
S Ser,2461173.8166,10.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
S Ser 20260513.3166 10.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.96259111 21.03.2026 11:05:57.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
First image: 2461120.96259111 21.03.2026 11:05:57.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Last image: 2461173.81677479 13.05.2026 07:35:59.342 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8241
Objects passed selection criteria: 8236
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7824
Average stars matched: 7572.5 (96.7855 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113568 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 03:19:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.96259111 21.03.2026 11:05:57.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
First image: 2461120.96259111 21.03.2026 11:05:57.872 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Last image: 2461173.81677479 13.05.2026 07:35:59.342 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 166
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40752
Objects passed selection criteria: 40650
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 36551.8
Average stars matched: 35486 (97.0843 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 142256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 03:21:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.81635868
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits was not found.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
The guess is 570 arcmin.
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6243 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6255 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Generating wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat from image00001.cat
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits created.
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out323724.xyls"...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out323722.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:47.336 +14:01:16.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7818 stars ###
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky324385.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
### Converted positions of 7821 stars ###
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky324421.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out323722.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 41.5322 (1.08949e+18), 10 match, 0 conflict, 29 distractors, 56 index.
RA,Dec = (226.619,14.0074), pixel scale 5.94518 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--+-+---+--+--+-+-----+--------+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out323724.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out323722.solved to indicate this.
Field: out323722.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.644603, 13.993991) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:34.705, +13:59:38.369).
Field size: 15.7828 x 10.5674 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.3 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> 'fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits'
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 41.8062 (1.43287e+18), 10 match, 0 conflict, 29 distractors, 56 index.
RA,Dec = (226.619,14.005), pixel scale 5.94524 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--+-+---+--+--+-+-----+--------+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:19 fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 03:19 out323722.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out323724.solved to indicate this.
Field: out323724.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.643929, 13.991728) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:34.543, +13:59:30.222).
Field size: 15.7829 x 10.5674 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.3 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> 'fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:19 fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 03:19 out323724.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits (fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits (fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out323722.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out323724.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out323722.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7183 degrees of RA,Dec (226.644,13.9932)
Reading file "./out323724.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7183 degrees of RA,Dec (226.643,13.991)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 41.8062 (1.43287e+18), 10 match, 0 conflict, 29 distractors, 56 index.
RA,Dec = (226.619,14.005), pixel scale 5.94524 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--+-+---+--+--+-+-----+--------+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 41.5322 (1.08949e+18), 10 match, 0 conflict, 29 distractors, 56 index.
RA,Dec = (226.619,14.0074), pixel scale 5.94518 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--+-+---+--+--+-+-----+--------+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out323724.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out323722.solved to indicate this.
Field: out323722.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.642057, 13.994964) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:34.094, +13:59:41.872).
Field size: 15.7674 x 10.5706 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.308 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:19 fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 03:19 out323722.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits)... done!
done!
Field: out323724.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.641386, 13.992691) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:33.933, +13:59:33.686).
Field size: 15.7675 x 10.5705 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.308 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 03:19 fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 03:19 out323724.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits"...
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 25335 sources.
simplexy: found 25346 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6985, 954.879] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 32.765 (1.69685e+14), 11 match, 0 conflict, 255 distractors, 12 index.
RA,Dec = (226.643,13.9957), pixel scale 5.98295 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+------------+--------------------------------+----+-------+--------+--------+-----------------
--> log-odds 32.765
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 186.67 (1.17451e+81), 21 match, 0 conflict, 183 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (226.643,13.9957), pixel scale 5.98295 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+-+-----+------+------------------+-------------+----+----+--++---+--++--------+--------+--------
--> log-odds 186.67
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Solving...
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 580.162 (9.14707e+251), 56 match, 0 conflict, 210 distractors, 58 index.
RA,Dec = (226.643,13.9957), pixel scale 5.98295 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+-+-+-+-+---+--+--+-+------++++--++---+----+----+----+----+--+++--+--+++------++--+---+-+----+++-
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6986, 954.881] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 17.3537
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 176.641 (5.17768e+76), 21 match, 0 conflict, 183 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (226.642,13.9935), pixel scale 5.98297 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +----+---+---------------+---+------------------+-------+-------++--++----------+--+------+-------+-
--> log-odds 176.641
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 586.767 (6.75631e+254), 56 match, 0 conflict, 195 distractors, 58 index.
RA,Dec = (226.642,13.9935), pixel scale 5.98297 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+-+-+-+---+-+----++-+++---+++----+------++---+--+-+--+-++----++--++---+------+-+++---+++------++-
--> log-odds 580.162
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 992.273 (inf), 95 match, 0 conflict, 171 distractors, 99 index.
RA,Dec = (226.643,13.9957), pixel scale 5.98295 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+++---+++-++++++++++---+++++++-+++--+----+----++-+-+-++-+--++-+++--++++----+++--+---+-+-++--++-
--> log-odds 586.767
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 990.717 (inf), 95 match, 0 conflict, 156 distractors, 99 index.
RA,Dec = (226.642,13.9935), pixel scale 5.98297 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++++-+--+-+++---++-+++--++++--+-+++-+++++---++++-+--+++--+-+++-+++--------+-++++++-++++-------++
--> log-odds 992.273
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1939.83 (inf), 194 match, 0 conflict, 215 distractors, 200 index.
RA,Dec = (226.643,13.9957), pixel scale 5.98295 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-+++-+++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++-+--++++++++++++-+--++++-+++++-+++++++++
--> log-odds 990.717
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1940.15 (inf), 194 match, 1 conflict, 190 distractors, 200 index.
RA,Dec = (226.642,13.9935), pixel scale 5.98297 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++--++++++-+++-+++-++++++-+-+++++++++--+++++-++-++++-++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 1939.83
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3587.75 (inf), 382 match, 1 conflict, 465 distractors, 390 index.
RA,Dec = (226.643,13.9957), pixel scale 5.98295 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 1940.15
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3589.21 (inf), 382 match, 1 conflict, 505 distractors, 390 index.
RA,Dec = (226.642,13.9935), pixel scale 5.98297 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3587.75
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6427.24 (inf), 729 match, 0 conflict, 1115 distractors, 739 index.
RA,Dec = (226.643,13.9957), pixel scale 5.98295 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3589.21
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6428.64 (inf), 729 match, 0 conflict, 965 distractors, 739 index.
RA,Dec = (226.642,13.9935), pixel scale 5.98297 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6427.24
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11720.5 (inf), 1439 match, 0 conflict, 1942 distractors, 1462 index.
RA,Dec = (226.643,13.9957), pixel scale 5.98295 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6428.64
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11705.3 (inf), 1438 match, 0 conflict, 2325 distractors, 1461 index.
RA,Dec = (226.642,13.9935), pixel scale 5.98297 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11720.5
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.642258, 13.995602) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:34.142, +13:59:44.167).
Field size: 15.7659 x 10.57 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.302 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.new"...
--> log-odds 11705.3
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.641560, 13.993323) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:33.974, +13:59:35.964).
Field size: 15.7659 x 10.5701 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.302 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.924 +13:59:41.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.756 +13:59:33.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7925 stars ###
### Converted positions of 7927 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky370396.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky370405.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.924 +13:59:41.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92
Second-epoch image center 15:06:33.924 +13:59:41.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0589 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.756 +13:59:33.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92
Second-epoch image center 15:06:33.756 +13:59:33.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0606 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:33.924 +13:59:41.38
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:33.756 +13:59:33.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00238 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H6P1QJfHMy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3XjEuwxsQg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CFIu3gkguB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wDPdEhkoaJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7821 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6200 to +19.2990 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6200 to 19.2990 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3688 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3688 out of 7821 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.933000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.933000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7821 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6200 to +19.2990 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6200 to 19.2990 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3511 out of 3688 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3688 out of 7821 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 7818 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5474 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6201 to +19.2992 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5474 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6201 to 19.2992 deg
Loaded 4353 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3530 out of 3691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3691 out of 7818 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
2.4 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
4.7 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
4.7 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
15.4 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.H6P1QJfHMy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=509, passed=7821
Got 7821 stars (including 7307 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7821 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=244 n_q2=222 n_q3=235 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3XjEuwxsQg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=497, passed=7818
Got 7818 stars (including 7317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7818 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=239 n_q2=225 n_q3=233 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CFIu3gkguB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, passed=7925
Got 7925 stars (including 7591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7925 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=244 n_q2=210 n_q3=253 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wDPdEhkoaJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, passed=7927
Got 7927 stars (including 7589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=245 n_q2=208 n_q3=253 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:00:28.45 +12:02:04.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:28:32.38 +18:01:46.8: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:01:46.65 +14:21:19.2: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:18:53.59 +10:25:31.1: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:30:17.26 +11:57:19.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:34:33.03 +12:12:49.3: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:36:04.82 +11:14:07.2: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:30:17.26 +11:57:19.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:01:46.65 +14:21:19.2: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:28:32.38 +18:01:46.8: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:00:28.45 +12:02:04.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:18:53.59 +10:25:31.1: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:17.26 +11:57:19.4: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4502 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:28.45 +12:02:04.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5292 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:32.38 +18:01:46.8: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3945 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:46.65 +14:21:19.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4478 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:53.59 +10:25:31.1: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5685 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:34:33.03 +12:12:49.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:33.03 +12:12:49.3: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4641 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:36:04.82 +11:14:07.2: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:04.82 +11:14:07.2: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0842 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20574_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 20574_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20615_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 20615_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20622_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 20622_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20623_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 20623_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20625_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 20625_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 20633_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 20634_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.756 +13:59:33.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.924 +13:59:41.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:47.336 +14:01:16.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 30886 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky429318.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 30701 stars ###
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky429320.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
### Converted positions of 43217 stars ###
### Converted positions of 42714 stars ###
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky429487.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky429453.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.924 +13:59:41.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92
Second-epoch image center 15:06:33.924 +13:59:41.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0589 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.756 +13:59:33.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:46.630 +14:01:24.92
Second-epoch image center 15:06:33.756 +13:59:33.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0606 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:33.924 +13:59:41.38
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:33.756 +13:59:33.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00238 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JCWojx90XT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PkjB01ahK2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y3k00lLTRo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1EWtgFbkT7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6024 to +19.3034 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6024 to 19.3034 deg
Loaded 4376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3281 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 43217 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.812600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.812600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6024 to +19.3034 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5013 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6024 to 19.3034 deg
Loaded 4376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3281 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 43217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 42714 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5042 to 235.0269 deg, Dec +8.6022 to +19.3010 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5042 to 235.0269 deg, Dec 8.6022 to 19.3010 deg
Loaded 4369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3312 out of 3700 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3700 out of 42714 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 137 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
2.2 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
4.1 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
4.1 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
15.5 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JCWojx90XT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2030, passed=43202
Got 43202 stars (including 41113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43202 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=243 n_q2=226 n_q3=227 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PkjB01ahK2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2000, passed=42697
Got 42697 stars (including 40639 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=239 n_q2=228 n_q3=232 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y3k00lLTRo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1447, passed=30685
Got 30685 stars (including 29212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30685 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=238 n_q2=208 n_q3=260 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1EWtgFbkT7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1467, passed=30862
Got 30862 stars (including 29364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=237 n_q2=208 n_q3=259 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_031211_TTUQ1b1x1_3816476_Fyj1U3A3/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:35:26.84 +10:50:03.1: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:35:37.13 +12:25:16.8: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:40:14.55 +17:41:53.7: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:03:24.39 +18:16:17.1: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:37:28.34 +15:49:41.6: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:34:01.36 +12:15:29.8: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:00:20.15 +14:01:54.7: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:36:56.26 +12:35:49.4: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:36:18.00 +17:16:08.0: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:43:54.91 +17:07:16.7: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:35:26.84 +10:50:03.1: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:26.84 +10:50:03.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3515 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:37:28.34 +15:49:41.6: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:35:37.13 +12:25:16.8: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:28.34 +15:49:41.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3933 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:37.13 +12:25:16.8: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6978 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:34:01.36 +12:15:29.8: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:03:24.39 +18:16:17.1: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:00:20.15 +14:01:54.7: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:40:14.55 +17:41:53.7: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:01.36 +12:15:29.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8864 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:36:56.26 +12:35:49.4: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:24.39 +18:16:17.1: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2928 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:20.15 +14:01:54.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3613 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:14.55 +17:41:53.7: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1053 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:56.26 +12:35:49.4: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2224 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:36:18.00 +17:16:08.0: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:18.00 +17:16:08.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2218 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:43:54.91 +17:07:16.7: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:54.91 +17:07:16.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0164 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:36:03.27 +09:04:32.8: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:15:37.00 +10:01:48.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:36:04.86 +11:14:06.4: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:27:07.98 +17:42:16.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:36:03.27 +09:04:32.8: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:15:37.00 +10:01:48.8: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:03.27 +09:04:32.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9964 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:37.00 +10:01:48.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4855 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:36:04.86 +11:14:06.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:27:07.98 +17:42:16.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:07:26.64 +09:13:59.0: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:04.86 +11:14:06.4: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3852 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:35:12.51 +10:25:08.3: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:45:25.47 +10:37:17.5: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:35:22.82 +13:15:05.8: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:07:26.64 +09:13:59.0: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:07:26.64 +09:13:59.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6497 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:35:12.51 +10:25:08.3: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:12.51 +10:25:08.3: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6008 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:45:25.47 +10:37:17.5: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:25.47 +10:37:17.5: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6544 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:32:46.64 +16:51:14.9: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:35:22.82 +13:15:05.8: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:22.82 +13:15:05.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5994 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:22:55.25 +13:22:57.5: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:32:46.64 +16:51:14.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:46.64 +16:51:14.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9044 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:22:55.25 +13:22:57.5: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:55.25 +13:22:57.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9147 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:37:45.84 +16:44:42.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:36:45.52 +10:36:17.3: 14.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:16:20.39 +09:56:03.0: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:37:45.84 +16:44:42.5: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:45.84 +16:44:42.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7042 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:26:09.83 +11:17:19.4: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:36:45.52 +10:36:17.3: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:45.52 +10:36:17.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1208 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:16:20.39 +09:56:03.0: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:20.39 +09:56:03.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1954 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:26:09.83 +11:17:19.4: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:09.83 +11:17:19.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1955 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:37:54.18 +15:51:45.3: 14.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:35:51.97 +09:31:22.8: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:09:08.09 +13:24:57.7: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:37:54.18 +15:51:45.3: 14.68 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:54.18 +15:51:45.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2677 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:35:51.97 +09:31:22.8: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:51.97 +09:31:22.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5794 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:09:08.09 +13:24:57.7: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:08.09 +13:24:57.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3053 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:14:59.58 +09:41:39.9: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:36:42.75 +12:03:07.0: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:14:59.58 +09:41:39.9: 14.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:59.58 +09:41:39.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8271 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:36:42.75 +12:03:07.0: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:42.75 +12:03:07.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7535 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:19:07.69 +14:24:45.4: 15.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:36:02.74 +13:34:45.8: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 14:47:51.73 +18:37:29.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:19:07.69 +14:24:45.4: 15.23 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:07.69 +14:24:45.4: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7243 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:03:17.42 +14:17:36.8: 14.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:08:25.81 +09:36:19.6: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:21:39.53 +14:18:52.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:36:02.74 +13:34:45.8: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-05-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits at 15:32:00.10 +09:24:27.2: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:02.74 +13:34:45.8: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7363 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 14:47:51.73 +18:37:29.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:03:17.42 +14:17:36.8: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:08:25.81 +09:36:19.6: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:03:17.42 +14:17:36.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1987 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:08:25.81 +09:36:19.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9285 delta=1.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:21:39.53 +14:18:52.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:21:39.53 +14:18:52.9: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6091 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-06-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:32:00.10 +09:24:27.2: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:00.10 +09:24:27.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4947 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20245.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29305.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52969_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52973_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52974_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52977_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52980_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52981_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52981_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52982_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52982_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 52985_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53001_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53001_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53007_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53009_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53009_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53011_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53128_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53128_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53189_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53189_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53220_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53220_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53235_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53263_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
Preparing report for the candidate 53263_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53297_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53311_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53313_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53313_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53372_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53372_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53380_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53380_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53394_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53394_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53444_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53444_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53447_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53452_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53452_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53467_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53467_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53476_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53476_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53478_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53478_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53484_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53484_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53502_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53502_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53509_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53509_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53526_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53526_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53527_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53527_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53529_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53529_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53530_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53530_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53536_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53536_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53541_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53541_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53550_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53550_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53554_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53554_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53563_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53563_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:27.85 +16:20:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53564_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53564_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53572_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53572_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53576_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53597_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53597_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53601_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53607_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53608_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53608_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53613_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53613_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53617_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53617_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53623_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53623_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53628_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53628_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53630_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53630_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53642_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53642_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53643_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53643_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53656_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53656_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53660_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53660_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53663_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53663_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53674_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53674_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53676_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53676_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53680_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53680_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53690_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53690_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53691_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53691_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53695_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53695_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53698_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53698_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53704_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53704_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53706_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53717_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53717_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53721_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53721_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:34.75 +12:33:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53723_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53723_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53731_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53731_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53736_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53745_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53745_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53748_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53749_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53749_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53757_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53760_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53760_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53775_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53775_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53784_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53784_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53792_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53797_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53797_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53798_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53798_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53813_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53813_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53826_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53826_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53829_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53829_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53832_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53832_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53834_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53834_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53838_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53838_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53841_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53841_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53842_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53843_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53843_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53846_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53848_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53848_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53849_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53849_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53850_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53850_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53851_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53851_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53854_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53854_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53855_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53861_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53861_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53866_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53866_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53867_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53867_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53869_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53869_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53870_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53870_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53876_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53876_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53880_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53880_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53881_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53881_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53888_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53888_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53891_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53891_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53895_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53895_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53898_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53898_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53900_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53900_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53901_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53902_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53902_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53903_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53903_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53905_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53905_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53906_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53906_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53909_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53909_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53912_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53912_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53913_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53913_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53917_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53917_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53919_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53919_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53922_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53922_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53926_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53926_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53928_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53928_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53933_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53933_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53941_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53941_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53954_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53954_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53961_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53961_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53970_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53970_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53973_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53973_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53977_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53977_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53980_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
Preparing report for the candidate 53980_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 53982_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20245_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
Preparing report for the candidate 20245_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29305_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
Preparing report for the candidate 29305_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19359_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
Preparing report for the candidate 19359_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28996_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274
The candidate 28996_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-35-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0274 did not pass the final checks
