This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2569 2461173.7569 12.82 17:10:38.64 -28:56:03.8
355.75905 6.37354 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX23" Gaia DR3 4107635051898977024
Type: SR|M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.550 G 14.780 G 319.300000000000 M
The object was found in astcheck.108 Hecuba 2 -1 2 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:10:38.64 -28:56:03.8: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:10:38.64 -28:56:03.8: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4107635051898977024,2461173.7569,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4107635051898977024 20260513.2569 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2569 2461173.7569 13.00 17:14:44.60 -26:35:27.1
358.21028 6.99586 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache 2 -0 2 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:14:44.60 -26:35:27.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:14:44.60 -26:35:27.1: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7569,13.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2569 13.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2569 2461173.7569 13.25 17:09:52.85 -22:39:55.7
0.81104 10.16088 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 1 1 2 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:09:52.85 -22:39:55.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:09:52.85 -22:39:55.7: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7569,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2569 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2569 2461173.7569 13.84 17:23:17.56 -24:16:42.3
1.23056 6.71315 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.425 Cornelia 2 1 2 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:23:17.56 -24:16:42.3: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:23:17.56 -24:16:42.3: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7569,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2569 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461173.75711404 13.05.2026 06:10:04.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7495
Objects passed selection criteria: 7491
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6516.75
Average stars matched: 6334 (97.1957 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114344 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 02:58:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461173.75711404 13.05.2026 06:10:04.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 135
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 69 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 83671
Objects passed selection criteria: 83568
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 78030
Average stars matched: 75590 (96.873 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1966528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 03:02:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.75669031
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
The guess is 571 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits was not found.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6164 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
The guess is 573 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6168 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1992490.xyls"...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat from image00002.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1992488.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:38.903 -26:00:22.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10448 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1993673.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
### Converted positions of 11434 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1993812.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1992490.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out1992488.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 78.6665 (1.46025e+34), 13 match, 0 conflict, 31 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9901), pixel scale 5.95813 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----+--+---+----+(best)-------------------------+-----++-----------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1992490.solved to indicate this.
log-odds ratio 83.383 (1.63229e+36), 13 match, 0 conflict, 25 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (259.198,-25.9927), pixel scale 5.95811 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----++-+--+(best)-------------------------++----------+------------------------
Field: out1992490.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (259.195536, -25.988235) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:16:46.929, -25:59:17.644).
Field size: 15.7293 x 10.5436 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.251398 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits' -> 'fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1992488.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1992488.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (259.197146, -25.990814) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:16:47.315, -25:59:26.929).
Field size: 15.7294 x 10.5435 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.253736 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> 'fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 02:58 fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 02:58 out1992490.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 02:58 fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 02:58 out1992488.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits (fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits (fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1992490.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1992488.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1992490.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6517 degrees of RA,Dec (259.196,-25.9874)
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1992488.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6533 degrees of RA,Dec (259.198,-25.99)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 78.6665 (1.46025e+34), 13 match, 0 conflict, 31 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9901), pixel scale 5.95813 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----+--+---+----+(best)-------------------------+-----++-----------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 83.383 (1.63229e+36), 13 match, 0 conflict, 25 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (259.198,-25.9927), pixel scale 5.95811 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----++-+--+(best)-------------------------++----------+------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1992490.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1992488.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1992490.xyls
Field: out1992488.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (259.195056, -25.987644) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:16:46.813, -25:59:15.520).
Field size: 15.719 x 10.548 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.248325 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (259.196664, -25.990229) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:16:47.199, -25:59:24.824).
Field size: 15.7192 x 10.5479 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.250484 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 02:58 fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 02:59 out1992490.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits)... -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 02:58 fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 02:59 out1992488.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... done!
Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 51089 sources.
simplexy: found 49845 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.526, 952.293] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 313.152 (1.00022e+136), 39 match, 0 conflict, 427 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (259.194,-25.9885), pixel scale 5.96675 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++---------------+---+----+--------+---------+------------+---++---+--+----+-++--+----+------+-+-
--> log-odds 313.152
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 804.515 (inf), 84 match, 0 conflict, 446 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (259.194,-25.9885), pixel scale 5.96675 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-++-+-+-+-+-+-++--+---+--+-+--------+-+--++---+--------+-+-++-+++---+--+----+-++--+---++------+-+-
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5255, 952.285] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 56.2055 (2.56885e+24), 19 match, 0 conflict, 415 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9911), pixel scale 5.9667 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------------------------------+--------------+------------+------+---------+----------------+++-+--
--> log-odds 804.515
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1775.29 (inf), 181 match, 0 conflict, 555 distractors, 190 index.
RA,Dec = (259.194,-25.9885), pixel scale 5.96675 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-++-+-+++-+++-+++-+--+++++++-+++---++-+--++++++--+--+-++++++++++++-++-++-++-+-++-++-++++++--+-++++
--> log-odds 56.2055
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 351.287 (3.64854e+152), 41 match, 0 conflict, 393 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9911), pixel scale 5.9667 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-------------+------+---+--+-+--------+---+---+-------++------+-------+-+---+------------+++-+-+
--> log-odds 351.287
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 811.159 (inf), 84 match, 0 conflict, 429 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9911), pixel scale 5.9667 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+-++-+-+-+---+++-+---+---+--+-+-+------+---+-+-+--+----++-----++-----+-+-++--+--+----+----+++-+++
--> log-odds 1775.29
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
--> log-odds 811.159
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3227.49 (inf), 345 match, 0 conflict, 1213 distractors, 360 index.
RA,Dec = (259.194,-25.9885), pixel scale 5.96675 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+++++++++++++-++-++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++-+-+++++++++++---++++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1774.45 (inf), 180 match, 0 conflict, 373 distractors, 190 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9911), pixel scale 5.9667 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--++++-+++++--+++++++-++-+-++-+-+-+--+-+++++++++-++-+++--++---+++++-++-+-+-++--+-++++--+-+-++++-+++
--> log-odds 1774.45
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3207.96 (inf), 342 match, 0 conflict, 1049 distractors, 360 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9911), pixel scale 5.9667 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-++++++++++++-++++++++-++-++++++++++++-+++-++++++++++++++++-+-++-++-+++++++-++++++++++
--> log-odds 3227.49
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6114.77 (inf), 694 match, 0 conflict, 1448 distractors, 723 index.
RA,Dec = (259.194,-25.9885), pixel scale 5.96675 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3207.96
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6110.57 (inf), 694 match, 0 conflict, 1549 distractors, 723 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9911), pixel scale 5.9667 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6114.77
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11328.9 (inf), 1409 match, 1 conflict, 4897 distractors, 1465 index.
RA,Dec = (259.194,-25.9885), pixel scale 5.96675 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6110.57
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11385.2 (inf), 1414 match, 1 conflict, 5089 distractors, 1465 index.
RA,Dec = (259.196,-25.9911), pixel scale 5.9667 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11328.9
Got 6 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (259.195171, -25.988007) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:16:46.841, -25:59:16.826).
Field size: 15.718 x 10.5456 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.248453 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
--> log-odds 11385.2
Got 7 solutions.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Field: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (259.196822, -25.990604) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:16:47.237, -25:59:26.175).
Field size: 15.7182 x 10.5455 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.250568 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.new"...
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.061 -25:59:13.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
renamed 'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
### Converted positions of 6503 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2073025.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.457 -25:59:23.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6583 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2073175.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.457 -25:59:23.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:47.457 -25:59:23.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0215 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.061 -25:59:13.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:47.061 -25:59:13.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0241 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:47.457 -25:59:23.18
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:47.061 -25:59:13.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00299 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5PUohv1kht
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k7ICs2OdZU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eAlca6Fjzn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JjeJTiTJlw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Loaded 11333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7330 out of 7692 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7692 out of 11434 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.802900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.802900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Loaded 11333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7330 out of 7692 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7692 out of 11434 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10448 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.7244 to 267.9414 deg, Dec -31.5299 to -20.1054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.7244 to 267.9414 deg, Dec -31.5299 to -20.1054 deg
Loaded 11826 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7072 out of 7305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7305 out of 10448 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.7 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.7 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.2 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5PUohv1kht (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=894, passed=11434
Got 11434 stars (including 10527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.985 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.822 n_q1=277 n_q2=292 n_q3=182 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.543
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.k7ICs2OdZU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=616, passed=10448
Got 10448 stars (including 9823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10448 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=304 n_q2=261 n_q3=197 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eAlca6Fjzn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=418, passed=6583
Got 6583 stars (including 6157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.786 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.766 n_q1=297 n_q2=244 n_q3=197 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JjeJTiTJlw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=441, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 6052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.861 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.777 n_q1=292 n_q2=245 n_q3=203 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.457 -25:59:23.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.061 -25:59:13.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:38.903 -26:00:22.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 74677 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 77030 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2156159.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2156168.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
### Converted positions of 109163 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2156450.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
### Converted positions of 128283 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2156509.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.457 -25:59:23.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:47.457 -25:59:23.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0215 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.061 -25:59:13.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:47.061 -25:59:13.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0241 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:47.457 -25:59:23.18
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:47.061 -25:59:13.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00299 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ApqcYljeah
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LZwTDQETaH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xek3jzKZFK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2cdGmxaUxd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 128283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Loaded 11378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7909 out of 9675 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9675 out of 128283 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.584200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.584200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 128283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Loaded 11378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7909 out of 9675 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9675 out of 128283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 109163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.6942 to 267.9448 deg, Dec -31.5317 to -20.0498 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.6942 to 267.9448 deg, Dec -31.5317 to -20.0498 deg
Loaded 11895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8453 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 109163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 102 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ApqcYljeah (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=11806, passed=128268
Got 128268 stars (including 116305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.972 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.896 n_q1=284 n_q2=290 n_q3=171 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.501
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LZwTDQETaH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=7684, passed=109157
Got 109157 stars (including 101310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=291 n_q2=254 n_q3=207 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xek3jzKZFK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4407, passed=74664
Got 74664 stars (including 70137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74664 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.719 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.743 n_q1=299 n_q2=239 n_q3=189 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2cdGmxaUxd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4404, passed=77024
Got 77024 stars (including 72500 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77024 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.819 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.749 n_q1=294 n_q2=244 n_q3=192 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-09-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025348_TTUQ2b1x1_1716126_ErC8nT59/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:55:45.69 -24:24:47.4: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:22:48.82 -28:09:16.3: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:53:43.55 -24:03:12.1: 13.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:05:02.71 -26:20:49.1: 13.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:56:05.22 -27:58:58.9: 13.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:56:43.68 -23:38:34.3: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:57:10.69 -29:15:41.7: 13.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:36.59 -27:45:14.2: 13.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:59:17.97 -28:10:56.7: 13.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:55:45.69 -24:24:47.4: 13.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:53:43.55 -24:03:12.1: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:45.69 -24:24:47.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5281 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:22:48.82 -28:09:16.3: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:56:05.22 -27:58:58.9: 13.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:05:02.71 -26:20:49.1: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:43.55 -24:03:12.1: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6205 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:02.71 -26:20:49.1: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3904 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:56:43.68 -23:38:34.3: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:48.82 -28:09:16.3: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3616 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:05.22 -27:58:58.9: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5047 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:43.68 -23:38:34.3: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9869 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:57:10.69 -29:15:41.7: 13.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:10.69 -29:15:41.7: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2218 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:36.59 -27:45:14.2: 13.37 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:36.59 -27:45:14.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5686 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:07:05.92 -24:51:40.8: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:59:17.97 -28:10:56.7: 13.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:17.97 -28:10:56.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6189 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:07:05.92 -24:51:40.8: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:05.92 -24:51:40.8: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2381 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:29.70 -29:29:24.8: 12.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:54.78 -28:50:17.5: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:19:20.02 -23:19:20.4: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:53.60 -28:39:44.2: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:25:38.75 -29:22:25.0: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:29.70 -29:29:24.8: 12.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:54.78 -28:50:17.5: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:19:20.02 -23:19:20.4: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:54.78 -28:50:17.5: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8525 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:29.70 -29:29:24.8: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9769 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:20.02 -23:19:20.4: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8598 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:11:50.07 -26:38:52.1: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:53.60 -28:39:44.2: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:53.60 -28:39:44.2: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8343 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:25:38.75 -29:22:25.0: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:25:15.42 -28:54:28.1: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:38.75 -29:22:25.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8224 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:57:33.16 -23:14:39.8: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:11:50.07 -26:38:52.1: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:50.07 -26:38:52.1: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7169 delta=-0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:25:15.42 -28:54:28.1: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:15.42 -28:54:28.1: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6528 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:57:33.16 -23:14:39.8: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:33.16 -23:14:39.8: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7147 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:53.55 -29:16:45.2: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:43.40 -28:47:27.9: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:20.47 -24:29:14.9: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:04.58 -28:41:17.0: 12.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:53.55 -29:16:45.2: 12.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:53.55 -29:16:45.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6090 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:45:53.42 -27:51:23.0: 12.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:20.47 -24:29:14.9: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:43.40 -28:47:27.9: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:20.47 -24:29:14.9: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6734 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:43.40 -28:47:27.9: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4465 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:57.95 -24:46:45.5: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:47:05.37 -25:48:52.6: 11.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:04.58 -28:41:17.0: 11.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:04.58 -28:41:17.0: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4192 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:33:33.72 -29:18:57.8: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:45:53.42 -27:51:23.0: 11.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:47:05.37 -25:48:52.6: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:05.37 -25:48:52.6: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7044 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:57.95 -24:46:45.5: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:53.42 -27:51:23.0: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2028 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:57.95 -24:46:45.5: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1635 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:33:33.72 -29:18:57.8: 11.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:33.72 -29:18:57.8: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1208 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:50:36.45 -26:46:37.4: 12.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:50:36.45 -26:46:37.4: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:36.45 -26:46:37.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2414 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:00:56.89 -27:15:09.3: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:52:16.28 -28:36:45.7: 12.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:10:38.64 -28:56:03.8: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:29.37 -27:58:34.3: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:00:17.15 -29:48:29.9: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:00:56.89 -27:15:09.3: 12.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:52:16.28 -28:36:45.7: 12.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:56.89 -27:15:09.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9773 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:16.28 -28:36:45.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8358 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:14:44.60 -26:35:27.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:10:38.64 -28:56:03.8: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:29.37 -27:58:34.3: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:29.37 -27:58:34.3: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9232 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:09:52.85 -22:39:55.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:00:17.15 -29:48:29.9: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:17.15 -29:48:29.9: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0545 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:14:44.60 -26:35:27.1: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:09:52.85 -22:39:55.7: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:51:19.96 -29:02:27.6: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:15:05.15 -29:41:35.0: 13.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:26:09.89 -28:57:44.4: 13.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:51:19.96 -29:02:27.6: 12.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:19.96 -29:02:27.6: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3128 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:19:54.18 -29:59:43.4: 13.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:46:54.59 -27:59:26.1: 14.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:30:05.66 -29:24:43.7: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:55:01.90 -28:10:17.2: 13.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:15:05.15 -29:41:35.0: 13.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:05.15 -29:41:35.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.2742 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:26:09.89 -28:57:44.4: 13.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:09.89 -28:57:44.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3480 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:19:54.18 -29:59:43.4: 13.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:54.18 -29:59:43.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3262 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:46:54.59 -27:59:26.1: 13.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:54.59 -27:59:26.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4553 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:30:05.66 -29:24:43.7: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:30:05.66 -29:24:43.7: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3165 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:55:01.90 -28:10:17.2: 13.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:01.90 -28:10:17.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3801 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:02.96 -29:20:16.3: 13.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:05:23.95 -27:49:48.4: 14.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:11:49.90 -26:57:33.9: 14.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:55:06.74 -24:58:21.7: 14.00 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:07:07.18 -29:02:53.9: 14.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:15:03.18 -29:10:09.4: 14.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:05:23.95 -27:49:48.4: 13.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:02.96 -29:20:16.3: 13.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:23.95 -27:49:48.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6179 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:02.96 -29:20:16.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5592 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:11:49.90 -26:57:33.9: 14.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:49.90 -26:57:33.9: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8022 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:07:07.18 -29:02:53.9: 13.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:07.18 -29:02:53.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5611 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:15:03.18 -29:10:09.4: 14.31 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:55:06.74 -24:58:21.7: 13.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:03.18 -29:10:09.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7452 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:06.74 -24:58:21.7: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7380 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:23:17.56 -24:16:42.3: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:23:17.56 -24:16:42.3: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:10:19.35 -28:24:54.3: 14.53 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:21:32.61 -24:09:38.4: 14.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:10:19.35 -28:24:54.3: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:19.35 -28:24:54.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8696 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:21:32.61 -24:09:38.4: 14.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:32.61 -24:09:38.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9949 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147186.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147260.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146745_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146745_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146749_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146749_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146751_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146751_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146758_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146758_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146759_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146759_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146761_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146761_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146769_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146769_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146770_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146770_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146781_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146781_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146783_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146783_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146790_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146790_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146793_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146793_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146808_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146808_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:39.81 -26:17:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146809_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146809_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:54.48 -24:08:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146815_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146815_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:53.38 -26:34:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146817_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146817_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146819_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146819_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146822_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146822_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146823_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146823_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:41.60 -29:47:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:46.74 -27:59:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146827_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146827_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146828_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146828_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146831_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146831_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:55.60 -26:52:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146833_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146833_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146835_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146835_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:38.18 -28:12:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146837_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146837_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146840_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146840_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:50.73 -22:17:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146841_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146841_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146845_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146845_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146846_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146846_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146847_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146847_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146981_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146981_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146993_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 146993_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:39.44 -27:40:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147012_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147012_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147019_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147019_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:28.56 -27:46:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147022_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147022_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147026_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147026_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:19.33 -24:53:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147037_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147037_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.38 -22:43:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147048_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147048_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:14.66 -29:31:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147099_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147099_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:50.11 -27:45:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147104_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147104_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:51.90 -30:05:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147105_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147105_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:44.71 -29:34:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147140_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147140_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147157_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147157_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:50.51 -27:57:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147176_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147176_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147181_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147181_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147182_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147182_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147186_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 147186_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147198_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147198_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:07.08 -28:14:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147206_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147206_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147214_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147214_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:32.68 -29:55:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147242_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147242_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147260_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 147260_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147263_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 147263_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147265_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147265_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:58.89 -30:11:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147271_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147271_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:58.19 -29:24:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147288_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147288_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:24.80 -26:26:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147289_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147289_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:50.53 -24:51:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147297_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147297_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:01.04 -22:29:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147299_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147299_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:16.97 -29:15:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147307_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147307_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147315_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147315_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:23.05 -27:34:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147322_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147322_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:33.60 -28:42:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147330_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147330_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.17 -22:41:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147334_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147334_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:56.44 -22:40:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147358_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147358_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147363_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147363_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147367_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147367_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147372_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147372_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147379_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147379_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147395_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147395_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147414_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147414_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:35.98 -22:43:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147422_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147422_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:22.86 -21:40:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147442_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147442_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:24.27 -28:16:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147463_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147463_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:31.41 -25:28:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147471_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147471_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147472_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147472_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147484_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147484_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147497_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147497_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147503_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147503_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147523_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147523_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147527_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147527_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147537_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 147537_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147540_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147540_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147545_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147545_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147563_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 147563_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:34.43 -26:07:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 120031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:39.69 -23:45:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140033_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 140033_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:10.89 -22:04:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 59225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:25.76 -27:02:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 141401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:31.15 -25:42:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 141132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:12.53 -28:42:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 140903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:16.72 -24:13:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 140201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:18.43 -25:34:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 140045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:09.59 -22:44:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139980_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 139980_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:52.64 -27:57:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 139779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:40.25 -27:26:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99727_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 99727_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.24 -22:01:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59524_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 59524_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:16.18 -26:57:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199
The candidate 30432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-10-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
