This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2449 2461173.7449 10.54 11:38:17.12 +02:08:40.4
264.79197 59.48616 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -1 1 1 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:38:17.12 +02:08:40.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:38:17.12 +02:08:40.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2448* 11 38 17.12 +02 08 40.4 10.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7449,10.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2449 10.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2449 2461173.7449 12.92 11:53:23.19 +01:18:23.0
272.17725 60.66402 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.122 Gerda -0 0 0 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:53:23.19 +01:18:23.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:53:23.19 +01:18:23.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2448* 11 53 23.19 +01 18 23.0 12.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7449,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2449 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2449 2461173.7449 13.21 12:21:36.30 +02:04:57.0
285.74876 63.95448 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.238 Hypatia 0 0 0 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:21:36.30 +02:04:57.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:21:36.30 +02:04:57.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2448* 12 21 36.30 +02 04 57.0 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7449,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2449 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2449 2461173.7449 13.77 11:58:21.21 +07:43:26.7
267.53810 66.87450 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.232 Russia -1 1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:58:21.21 +07:43:26.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:58:21.21 +07:43:26.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2448* 11 58 21.21 +07 43 26.7 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7449,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2449 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2449 2461173.7449 13.87 11:36:19.00 +03:55:31.4
261.95394 60.67361 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda -1 -0 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:36:19.00 +03:55:31.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:36:19.00 +03:55:31.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2448* 11 36 19.00 +03 55 31.4 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7449,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2449 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2449 2461173.7449 14.60 12:11:04.02 +04:02:00.3
278.52374 64.97439 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.339 Dorothea 0 1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:11:04.02 +04:02:00.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:11:04.02 +04:02:00.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2448* 12 11 04.02 +04 02 00.3 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7449,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2449 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2449 2461173.7449 14.58 11:56:16.16 +05:42:32.4
268.96342 64.87713 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.274 Philagoria -0 0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:56:16.16 +05:42:32.4: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:56:16.16 +05:42:32.4: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2448* 11 56 16.16 +05 42 32.4 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7449,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2449 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2449 2461173.7449 14.91 12:20:14.56 +09:10:50.5
279.15016 70.59827 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.542 Susanna -1 1 1 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:20:14.56 +09:10:50.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:20:14.56 +09:10:50.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2448* 12 20 14.56 +09 10 50.5 14.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7449,14.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2449 14.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.88759324 11.02.2026 09:17:58.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
First image: 2461082.88759324 11.02.2026 09:17:58.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Last image: 2461173.74505399 13.05.2026 05:52:42.665 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5429
Objects passed selection criteria: 5429
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5283.75
Average stars matched: 5071 (95.9735 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111380 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 01:44:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.88759324 11.02.2026 09:17:58.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
First image: 2461082.88759324 11.02.2026 09:17:58.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Last image: 2461173.74505399 13.05.2026 05:52:42.665 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29994
Objects passed selection criteria: 29928
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29090.5
Average stars matched: 27888.5 (95.8681 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131920 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 01:46:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.74464990
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 569 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5074 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5030 high-SNR stars for plate solving
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat from image00002.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out98634.xyls"...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out98636.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.402 +05:59:41.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:56.919 +05:59:26.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5680 stars ###
### Converted positions of 5340 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky99069.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky99098.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out98634.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out98636.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 94.2016 (8.15157e+40), 86 match, 1 conflict, 217 distractors, 367 index.
RA,Dec = (180.038,6.07805), pixel scale 5.93283 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+++----+++++----++++------++-------+----+++-----+c++-----+++-------+-------+-----++-----+++-----
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1: solved with index index-4112.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out98634.solved to indicate this.
Field: out98634.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.038344, 6.053950) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:09.203, +06:03:14.219).
Field size: 15.634 x 10.5826 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.33 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 01:44 fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 01:44 out98634.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits)... done!
log-odds ratio 88.145 (1.90935e+38), 12 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (180.053,6.05569), pixel scale 5.97727 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++--+++---+-+-+---+--+-+------+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out98636.solved to indicate this.
Field: out98636.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.058117, 6.053348) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:13.948, +06:03:12.053).
Field size: 15.7896 x 10.5713 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.42 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 01:44 fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 01:44 out98636.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... done!
Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out98634.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out98636.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out98634.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6383 degrees of RA,Dec (180.037,6.05317)
log-odds ratio 88.2298 (2.07833e+38), 12 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (180.055,6.05551), pixel scale 5.97727 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---+++---+-+-+-+----+-+------+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out98636.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7183 degrees of RA,Dec (180.057,6.05257)
log-odds ratio 88.145 (1.90935e+38), 12 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (180.053,6.05569), pixel scale 5.97727 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++--+++---+-+-+---+--+-+------+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out98634.solved to indicate this.
Field: out98634.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.062489, 6.051467) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:14.997, +06:03:05.280).
Field size: 15.764 x 10.5747 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.404 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 01:44 fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 01:44 out98634.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out98636.solved to indicate this.
done!
Field: out98636.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.059787, 6.051641) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:14.349, +06:03:05.906).
Field size: 15.7643 x 10.5749 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.405 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 01:44 fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 01:44 out98636.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 22249 sources.
simplexy: found 22241 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7326, 955.391] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 15.655
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 152.827 (2.35408e+66), 24 match, 0 conflict, 378 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (180.063,6.05224), pixel scale 5.98616 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-----+------++--------------------------+-+------------+--------+-----------------------------++-
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7324, 955.387] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.67552
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 147.117 (7.79896e+63), 24 match, 0 conflict, 394 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (180.061,6.05242), pixel scale 5.98614 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+------+-----------++---+-+---+----+------+----------------------+--------------------------
--> log-odds 152.827
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 404.387 (4.19593e+175), 48 match, 0 conflict, 354 distractors, 48 index.
RA,Dec = (180.063,6.05224), pixel scale 5.98616 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+--++-----++----+----+-------+------+++-+---------+--++------++-----------------------------++-
--> log-odds 147.117
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
--> log-odds 404.387
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 408.516 (2.60752e+177), 48 match, 0 conflict, 370 distractors, 48 index.
RA,Dec = (180.061,6.05242), pixel scale 5.98614 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+----+--+----++---+----+--++---+++-+-++---+------+-------+--------------+-+------------------------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 865.475 (inf), 95 match, 0 conflict, 370 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (180.063,6.05224), pixel scale 5.98616 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-++-++-----+++--++-+-+++---+--+-+----+++-+-----+--++--+++--+--++-----+------++----------+----++-
--> log-odds 865.475
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1715.56 (inf), 189 match, 0 conflict, 276 distractors, 189 index.
RA,Dec = (180.063,6.05224), pixel scale 5.98616 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+++++-+++-+++--+++++++++-++++++++-++++++++-+-++-++++-++++-+-+++-+--+++++--+++-+-++++--++--+++++
--> log-odds 408.516
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 855.516 (inf), 95 match, 0 conflict, 410 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (180.061,6.05242), pixel scale 5.98614 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---++-++----++---+---++-+++---+++++-++---+---+-++-+-----+-------+----+-+-+-+----++------+--------+
--> log-odds 1715.56
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3161.74 (inf), 369 match, 1 conflict, 702 distractors, 375 index.
RA,Dec = (180.063,6.05224), pixel scale 5.98616 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 855.516
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1706.1 (inf), 189 match, 0 conflict, 316 distractors, 189 index.
RA,Dec = (180.061,6.05242), pixel scale 5.98614 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+++-++++-++++-++-++++-+++-+++++++-+++--++-++-++-++--+++--++-+++-+-++++-+-++-++++---++-++---++-++
--> log-odds 3161.74
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5741.87 (inf), 730 match, 0 conflict, 832 distractors, 744 index.
RA,Dec = (180.063,6.05224), pixel scale 5.98616 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 1706.1
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3163.47 (inf), 370 match, 1 conflict, 565 distractors, 375 index.
RA,Dec = (180.061,6.05242), pixel scale 5.98614 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++-+++++-+++++-+++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++++-+++++++--++++++
--> log-odds 3163.47
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
--> log-odds 5741.87
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5746.16 (inf), 731 match, 0 conflict, 1023 distractors, 744 index.
RA,Dec = (180.061,6.05242), pixel scale 5.98614 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10376.1 (inf), 1427 match, 1 conflict, 1880 distractors, 1459 index.
RA,Dec = (180.063,6.05224), pixel scale 5.98616 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5746.16
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10386.6 (inf), 1426 match, 1 conflict, 1977 distractors, 1459 index.
RA,Dec = (180.061,6.05242), pixel scale 5.98614 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10376.1
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.061687, 6.051832) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:14.805, +06:03:06.594).
Field size: 15.7708 x 10.5736 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.41 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.new"...
--> log-odds 10386.6
Got 7 solutions.
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.058995, 6.051997) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:14.159, +06:03:07.188).
Field size: 15.7709 x 10.5737 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.411 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.new"...
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:14.592 +06:03:03.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
### Converted positions of 5154 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky105377.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:13.946 +06:03:04.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5108 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky105704.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits'
wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:56.919 +05:59:26.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:14.592 +06:03:03.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:56.919 +05:59:26.73
Second-epoch image center 12:00:14.592 +06:03:03.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0949 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:13.946 +06:03:04.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:56.919 +05:59:26.73
Second-epoch image center 12:00:13.946 +06:03:04.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0929 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:14.592 +06:03:03.79
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:13.946 +06:03:04.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00268 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pUZuwSDrnQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ygi8BNPIN5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ICLXexTavO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6YaqRcKnAv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5340 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9403 to 187.9037 deg, Dec +0.6004 to +11.2974 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9403 to 187.9037 deg, Dec 0.6004 to 11.2974 deg
Loaded 3816 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3034 out of 3179 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3179 out of 5340 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.882900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.882900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5340 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9403 to 187.9037 deg, Dec +0.6004 to +11.2974 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9403 to 187.9037 deg, Dec 0.6004 to 11.2974 deg
Loaded 3816 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3034 out of 3179 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3179 out of 5340 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.8319 to 188.3078 deg, Dec +0.2216 to +11.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.8319 to 188.3078 deg, Dec 0.2216 to 11.6837 deg
Loaded 4163 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3080 out of 3193 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3193 out of 5680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
2.2 pix Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pUZuwSDrnQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=406, passed=5340
Got 5340 stars (including 4929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5340 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=233 n_q2=263 n_q3=249 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.388
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits -region wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ygi8BNPIN5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, passed=5680
Got 5680 stars (including 5308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.219 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=226 n_q2=237 n_q3=251 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ICLXexTavO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=331, passed=5154
Got 5154 stars (including 4816 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5154 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.214 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=234 n_q2=243 n_q3=247 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6YaqRcKnAv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, passed=5108
Got 5108 stars (including 4765 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=234 n_q2=243 n_q3=245 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:41:09.39 +10:47:51.9: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:38:17.12 +02:08:40.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:13.69 +10:17:40.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:26.27 +10:26:49.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:41:09.39 +10:47:51.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:38:17.12 +02:08:40.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:13.69 +10:17:40.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:26.27 +10:26:49.8: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:41:09.39 +10:47:51.9: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2417 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:26.27 +10:26:49.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:13.69 +10:17:40.2: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7877 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20747.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20744_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 20744_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:14.08 +10:19:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20747_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 20747_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20748_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 20748_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20752_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 20752_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:15:01.98 +07:31:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20759_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 20759_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20764_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 20764_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:38:17.12 +02:08:40.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
The guess is 573 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 569 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:14.592 +06:03:03.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:56.919 +05:59:26.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:13.946 +06:03:04.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.402 +05:59:41.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 27950 stars ###
### Converted positions of 28157 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 30325 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky210505.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky210504.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky210523.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
### Converted positions of 30795 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky210534.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:56.919 +05:59:26.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:14.592 +06:03:03.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:56.919 +05:59:26.73
Second-epoch image center 12:00:14.592 +06:03:03.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0949 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:13.946 +06:03:04.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:56.919 +05:59:26.73
Second-epoch image center 12:00:13.946 +06:03:04.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0929 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:14.592 +06:03:03.79
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:13.946 +06:03:04.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00268 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nb57jc8tly
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5mUQe6VxbP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TiwyOjiuTn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QjrqUHRJPz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9157 to 187.9160 deg, Dec +0.5941 to +11.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9157 to 187.9160 deg, Dec 0.5941 to 11.3062 deg
Loaded 3833 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2973 out of 3248 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3248 out of 30325 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9157 to 187.9160 deg, Dec +0.5941 to +11.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9157 to 187.9160 deg, Dec 0.5941 to 11.3062 deg
Loaded 3833 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2973 out of 3248 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3248 out of 30325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 30795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.8265 to 188.3134 deg, Dec +0.1899 to +11.6919 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.8265 to 188.3134 deg, Dec 0.1899 to 11.6919 deg
Loaded 4183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2991 out of 3239 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3239 out of 30795 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
2.1 pix Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
15.4 mag. Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Nb57jc8tly (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1115, passed=30307
Got 30307 stars (including 29142 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30307 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=230 n_q2=262 n_q3=252 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.346
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits -region wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5mUQe6VxbP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1127, passed=30784
Got 30784 stars (including 29616 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30784 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.207 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=225 n_q2=244 n_q3=247 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TiwyOjiuTn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=848, passed=27944
Got 27944 stars (including 27052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.202 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.220 n_q1=234 n_q2=247 n_q3=246 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QjrqUHRJPz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=853, passed=28148
Got 28148 stars (including 27249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28148 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=240 n_q2=242 n_q3=247 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_014214_TTUQ1b1x1_4186848_FTxdLbFN/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:05.80 +10:09:31.1: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:01.77 +10:14:09.9: 10.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:50:58.26 +08:33:27.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:13.68 +10:17:40.2: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:30:54.17 +10:19:05.2: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:05.80 +10:09:31.1: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:01.77 +10:14:09.9: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:50:58.26 +08:33:27.6: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:13.68 +10:17:40.2: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:13.68 +10:17:40.2: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8910 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:05.80 +10:09:31.1: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7048 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:01.77 +10:14:09.9: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9359 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:50:58.26 +08:33:27.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.6187 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:29:21.36 +10:38:09.5: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:09.06 +10:18:27.7: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:53:23.19 +01:18:23.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:30:54.17 +10:19:05.2: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:54.17 +10:19:05.2: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2308 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:29:21.36 +10:38:09.5: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:21.36 +10:38:09.5: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8004 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:21:36.30 +02:04:57.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:53:23.19 +01:18:23.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:09.06 +10:18:27.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:09.06 +10:18:27.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9515 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:01:48.56 +06:06:06.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:45:07.90 +07:49:49.8: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:32.42 +10:15:15.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:21:36.30 +02:04:57.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:58:21.21 +07:43:26.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:29.87 +10:18:26.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:01:48.56 +06:06:06.1: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:01:48.56 +06:06:06.1: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3257 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:45:07.90 +07:49:49.8: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:32.42 +10:15:15.2: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:32.42 +10:15:15.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:45:07.90 +07:49:49.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5155 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:27.63 +10:24:07.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:58:21.21 +07:43:26.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:36:19.00 +03:55:31.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:29.87 +10:18:26.1: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:29.87 +10:18:26.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:27.63 +10:24:07.4: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:27.63 +10:24:07.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:36:19.00 +03:55:31.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:27:03.00 +10:24:10.9: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:22:29.64 +10:21:29.8: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:23.46 +10:06:48.0: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:30:36.57 +10:29:53.2: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:24.01 +09:58:31.0: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:27:03.00 +10:24:10.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:22:29.64 +10:21:29.8: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:03.00 +10:24:10.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1578 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:29.64 +10:21:29.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1345 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:23.46 +10:06:48.0: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:23.46 +10:06:48.0: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2033 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:30:36.57 +10:29:53.2: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:36.57 +10:29:53.2: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1799 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:24.01 +09:58:31.0: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:24.01 +09:58:31.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1538 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:13:54.34 +06:54:26.3: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:13.35 +10:27:25.7: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:13:54.34 +06:54:26.3: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:07:15.39 +09:40:17.9: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:13:54.34 +06:54:26.3: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2666 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:13.35 +10:27:25.7: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:07:15.39 +09:40:17.9: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:13.35 +10:27:25.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3080 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:07:15.39 +09:40:17.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2665 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:30:23.13 +10:35:49.5: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:30:23.13 +10:35:49.5: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:23.13 +10:35:49.5: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3332 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:11:04.02 +04:02:00.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:17:25.74 +06:34:57.0: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:24:46.88 +07:21:09.8: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:25.50 +09:01:49.9: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:11:04.02 +04:02:00.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:24:46.88 +07:21:09.8: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:17:25.74 +06:34:57.0: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:46.88 +07:21:09.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6407 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:25.74 +06:34:57.0: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3907 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:25.50 +09:01:49.9: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:25.50 +09:01:49.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6456 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:08:19.28 +08:18:52.7: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:21.96 +09:47:56.3: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:08:19.28 +08:18:52.7: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:08:19.28 +08:18:52.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5024 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:56:16.16 +05:42:32.4: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:14:13.19 +03:57:19.2: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:21.96 +09:47:56.3: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:21.96 +09:47:56.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7757 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:56:16.16 +05:42:32.4: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:14:13.19 +03:57:19.2: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:27:13.34 +06:44:58.4: 15.30 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:14:13.19 +03:57:19.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7031 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:31:11.99 +08:41:31.7: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:27:13.34 +06:44:58.4: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:13.34 +06:44:58.4: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8095 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:31:11.99 +08:41:31.7: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:11.99 +08:41:31.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7744 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:25:04.38 +04:46:39.0: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:25:04.38 +04:46:39.0: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:04.38 +04:46:39.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8304 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:29:15.26 +06:59:06.4: 15.44 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:39:31.24 +07:45:48.8: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:53:39.32 +08:33:12.6: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:29:15.26 +06:59:06.4: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:15.26 +06:59:06.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8527 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:30:28.21 +06:18:59.8: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:39:31.24 +07:45:48.8: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:53:39.32 +08:33:12.6: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:31.24 +07:45:48.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8152 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:53:39.32 +08:33:12.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6401 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:30:28.21 +06:18:59.8: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:28.21 +06:18:59.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7416 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:22:07.85 +09:35:36.5: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:23:58.69 +05:57:44.9: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:10:07.15 +01:08:07.2: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:22:07.85 +09:35:36.5: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:07.85 +09:35:36.5: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8604 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:23:58.69 +05:57:44.9: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:58.69 +05:57:44.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8007 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:10:07.15 +01:08:07.2: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:10:07.15 +01:08:07.2: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8672 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:26:31.69 +09:07:24.3: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:26:31.69 +09:07:24.3: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:31.69 +09:07:24.3: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8814 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:21:04.75 +05:43:34.8: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:21:04.75 +05:43:34.8: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:04.75 +05:43:34.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8082 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:23:54.70 +06:31:17.7: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:23:54.70 +06:31:17.7: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:54.70 +06:31:17.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9242 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:20:14.56 +09:10:50.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 11:31:22.62 +02:00:43.3: 15.69 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-17-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0426.fits at 12:20:21.07 +07:03:54.9: 15.53 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:20:14.56 +09:10:50.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 11:31:22.62 +02:00:43.3: 15.49 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:22.62 +02:00:43.3: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.9161 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-13-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0188.fits at 12:20:21.07 +07:03:54.9: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:21.07 +07:03:54.9: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9014 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53628.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53641.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53673.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53733.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53779.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53862.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53576_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53577_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53577_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:13:50.56 +10:22:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53578_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:26:08.71 +10:17:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53580_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53580_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:14.07 +10:19:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53584_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53584_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:17.12 +02:08:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53588_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53588_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53590_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53590_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:15:01.95 +07:31:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53596_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53596_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53597_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53597_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53601_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53604_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53604_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53605_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53605_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53608_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53608_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53612_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53612_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53617_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53617_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:11.39 +07:19:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53618_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53618_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:05.50 +10:26:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53619_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53619_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53623_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53623_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53628_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53628_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53631_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53631_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:24:27.70 +04:20:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53632_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53632_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:34.13 +03:25:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53634_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53634_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53641_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53641_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53645_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53645_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53654_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53654_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53659_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53659_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:09.37 +10:21:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53660_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53660_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53664_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53664_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53671_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53671_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53673_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53678_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53678_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53679_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53679_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:30:56.01 +10:32:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53680_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53680_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53681_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53681_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53682_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53682_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53683_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53683_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53689_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53689_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53690_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53690_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53691_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53691_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53692_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53692_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53695_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53695_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53696_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53696_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53698_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53698_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53699_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53699_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53700_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53705_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53705_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:45.26 +04:18:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53706_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53707_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53709_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53709_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53710_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53710_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:22.09 +08:09:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53712_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53712_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53714_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53714_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53715_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53715_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53720_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:44.15 +02:19:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53722_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53725_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53725_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53728_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53728_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53729_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53729_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53731_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53731_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53732_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53732_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53733_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53736_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:29.64 +02:50:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53737_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53737_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53740_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53742_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53742_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53745_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53745_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53748_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53752_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53754_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53754_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53757_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53759_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53759_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53762_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:34.71 +09:38:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53769_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53769_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53771_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53771_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:30:14.86 +10:22:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53777_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53777_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53779_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53779_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53781_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53781_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53782_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53782_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53785_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53785_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53788_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53788_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53792_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53793_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53793_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53794_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53794_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53797_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53797_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53801_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53801_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53804_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53804_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53806_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53806_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53809_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53809_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53817_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53817_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53820_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53820_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53821_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53821_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53822_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53822_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:30:08.09 +05:17:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53829_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53829_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53831_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53831_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53837_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53837_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53842_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53845_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53845_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53856_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53856_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53857_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53857_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53858_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53858_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53862_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 53862_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53867_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53867_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53871_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53871_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53872_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53872_fd_Vir-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-52-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
