This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2006 2461173.7006 10.27 11:38:16.56 +02:08:43.4
264.78723 59.48558 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -1 1 1 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:38:16.56 +02:08:43.4: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:38:16.56 +02:08:43.4: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2006* 11 38 16.56 +02 08 43.4 10.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7006,10.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2006 10.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2006 2461173.7006 12.99 11:08:44.01 +01:33:49.5
254.67770 54.51361 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -2 1 2 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:08:44.01 +01:33:49.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:08:44.01 +01:33:49.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2006* 11 08 44.01 +01 33 49.5 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7006,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2006 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2006 2461173.7006 14.09 10:41:17.30 +00:42:43.4
247.69860 49.10449 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.420 Bertholda -3 2 3 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:17.30 +00:42:43.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:17.30 +00:42:43.4: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2006* 10 41 17.30 +00 42 43.4 14.1 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7006,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2006 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2006 2461173.7006 10.73 10:57:44.96 -04:33:26.0
257.68987 48.07400 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J105745-0433.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.560 V Y 0.890 V 2452775.80000 1521.000000000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:57:44.96 -04:33:26.0: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:57:44.96 -04:33:26.0: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2006* 10 57 44.96 -04 33 26.0 10.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J105745-0433.5,2461173.7006,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J105745-0433.5 20260513.2006 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.72774068 09.04.2026 05:27:46.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
First image: 2461139.72774068 09.04.2026 05:27:46.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Last image: 2461173.70087366 13.05.2026 04:49:05.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6436
Objects passed selection criteria: 6435
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6047.25
Average stars matched: 5818.75 (96.2214 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112040 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 00:34:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.72774068 09.04.2026 05:27:46.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
First image: 2461139.72774068 09.04.2026 05:27:46.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Last image: 2461173.70087366 13.05.2026 04:49:05.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 51
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31748
Objects passed selection criteria: 31674
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29696.8
Average stars matched: 28389.5 (95.598 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 00:35:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.70027376
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5315 high-SNR stars for plate solving
The guess is 571 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5292 high-SNR stars for plate solving
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not found.
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits was not found.
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4071990.xyls"...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4071996.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6113 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4072466.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
### Converted positions of 6012 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4072475.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out4071996.axy"...
Reading file "./out4071990.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 64.6295 (1.17017e+28), 9 match, 0 conflict, 12 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (167.191,-1.98116), pixel scale 5.97205 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+++--++---+-+----+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 62.953 (2.18856e+27), 9 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (167.203,-1.97257), pixel scale 5.97218 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++++--+--+-+---+----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4071996.solved to indicate this.
Field: out4071996.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.198311, -1.979438) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:47.595, -01:58:45.978).
Field size: 15.7905 x 10.573 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.428 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4071990.solved to indicate this.
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits'
Field: out4071990.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.208688, -1.970311) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:50.085, -01:58:13.121).
Field size: 15.7903 x 10.5735 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.433 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:34 fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:34 out4071996.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:34 fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:34 out4071990.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits (fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4071996.xyls"...
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4071990.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out4071996.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7 degrees of RA,Dec (167.197,-1.98022)
log-odds ratio 64.6295 (1.17017e+28), 9 match, 0 conflict, 12 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (167.191,-1.98116), pixel scale 5.97205 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+++--++---+-+----+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4071996.solved to indicate this.
Field: out4071996.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.197047, -1.982440) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:47.291, -01:58:56.782).
Field size: 15.7665 x 10.5755 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.443 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Reading file "./out4071990.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7067 degrees of RA,Dec (167.208,-1.97109)
log-odds ratio 62.953 (2.18856e+27), 9 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (167.203,-1.97257), pixel scale 5.97218 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++++--+--+-+---+----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:34 fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:34 out4071996.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits)... done!
done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4071990.solved to indicate this.
Field: out4071990.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.208793, -1.973822) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:50.110, -01:58:25.761).
Field size: 15.7667 x 10.5756 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.45 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:34 fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:34 out4071990.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 21918 sources.
simplexy: found 21979 sources.
Solving...
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7164, 955.147] arcmin
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7178, 955.168] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 54.9381 (7.23305e+23), 14 match, 0 conflict, 227 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (167.21,-1.97304), pixel scale 5.98463 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+------------------------------------+---------+--+-------+---------------------------+--------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 57.6334 (1.07125e+25), 14 match, 0 conflict, 205 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,-1.98166), pixel scale 5.98476 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---------------------+------------+----------+---------+------+-------------------------------+----+
--> log-odds 54.9381
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
--> log-odds 57.6334
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 202.185 (6.42238e+87), 23 match, 0 conflict, 218 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (167.21,-1.97304), pixel scale 5.98463 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +----+-----------+-----------------++-----+--+--+---+--+--+----+--+------------------------+--------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 201.474 (3.15558e+87), 23 match, 0 conflict, 196 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,-1.98166), pixel scale 5.98476 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+------------------+------+---+-++-+-------+---------+--+---+------------------------+------+----+
--> log-odds 202.185
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
--> log-odds 201.474
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 450.691 (5.40279e+195), 47 match, 0 conflict, 259 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (167.21,-1.97304), pixel scale 5.98463 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---+--+-----+--+--+--------------++-----+--+--+---+--+--+----+--+++------+---------------+--------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 454.116 (1.66057e+197), 47 match, 0 conflict, 236 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,-1.98166), pixel scale 5.98476 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-----+-+---+---+--+------+---+-++-+-----+-+-------+-+--+---+-----------+--------+---+---+--+----+
--> log-odds 454.116
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
--> log-odds 450.691
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 919.093 (inf), 92 match, 0 conflict, 261 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,-1.98166), pixel scale 5.98476 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++---++-+---+---+--+++-++++++-++++-++---++-++--+-+-+++--+-+-+-++++-++++-+---++---+---++-+++-++---+
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 924.897 (inf), 92 match, 0 conflict, 261 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (167.21,-1.97304), pixel scale 5.98463 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+-++++-----++-+--+++-------+--+-++-+---++++--+-+-++++-+++--++-++++-+----++-+-+-+---+-+-++--------
--> log-odds 919.093
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
--> log-odds 924.897
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1789.49 (inf), 187 match, 0 conflict, 269 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,-1.98166), pixel scale 5.98476 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++--+++++--+++-++--++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++++++++-+-+++++++++++-++--++++++-+-+++++++++-+++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1842.54 (inf), 189 match, 0 conflict, 251 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (167.21,-1.97304), pixel scale 5.98463 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+-++++++--+++-++-+++++++-++++-+++++++-+++++--+++-+++++++++-+++++++-++++-++++++-+++-+-+-++-++-+-+-
--> log-odds 1842.54
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
--> log-odds 1789.49
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3316.39 (inf), 362 match, 0 conflict, 343 distractors, 379 index.
RA,Dec = (167.21,-1.97304), pixel scale 5.98463 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++
log-odds ratio 3238.22 (inf), 357 match, 1 conflict, 310 distractors, 378 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,-1.98166), pixel scale 5.98476 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3316.39
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3238.22
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
log-odds ratio 5946.75 (inf), 704 match, 0 conflict, 947 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (167.21,-1.97304), pixel scale 5.98463 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5800.25 (inf), 690 match, 1 conflict, 895 distractors, 729 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,-1.98166), pixel scale 5.98476 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5946.75
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10930.5 (inf), 1403 match, 1 conflict, 1901 distractors, 1450 index.
RA,Dec = (167.21,-1.97304), pixel scale 5.98463 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5800.25
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10682.7 (inf), 1381 match, 1 conflict, 1851 distractors, 1448 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,-1.98166), pixel scale 5.98476 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10930.5
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.208786, -1.972967) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:50.109, -01:58:22.681).
Field size: 15.767 x 10.5717 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.443 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.new"...
--> log-odds 10682.7
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.196917, -1.981603) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:47.260, -01:58:53.770).
Field size: 15.7669 x 10.5717 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.443 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:49.897 -01:58:25.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:47.048 -01:58:56.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6159 stars ###
### Converted positions of 6117 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4080797.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4080798.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:47.048 -01:58:56.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:47.048 -01:58:56.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0551 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:49.897 -01:58:25.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:49.897 -01:58:25.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0691 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:47.048 -01:58:56.57
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:49.897 -01:58:25.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01467 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LTODrmGbzF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UUtWtjgoXg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oDBQTnCKDZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SyujcxYRg4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3154 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3154 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3221 out of 3325 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3325 out of 6012 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.770800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.770800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3154 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3154 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3221 out of 3325 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3325 out of 6012 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg
Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.4 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
3.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
3.4 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LTODrmGbzF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, passed=6012
Got 6012 stars (including 5599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=220 n_q2=241 n_q3=237 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UUtWtjgoXg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=6113
Got 6113 stars (including 5671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.594 n_q1=219 n_q2=240 n_q3=231 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oDBQTnCKDZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, passed=6159
Got 6159 stars (including 5848 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6159 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=228 n_q2=208 n_q3=256 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SyujcxYRg4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=6117
Got 6117 stars (including 5822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=229 n_q2=212 n_q3=251 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:38:16.56 +02:08:43.4: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:37:43.82 +02:11:18.1: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:10:16.87 -02:14:59.1: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:04:29.56 -05:22:00.5: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:37:43.82 +02:11:18.1: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:10:16.87 -02:14:59.1: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:38:16.56 +02:08:43.4: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2044 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:43.82 +02:11:18.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9099 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:04:29.56 -05:22:00.5: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:16.87 -02:14:59.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1421 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1911 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:29.56 -05:22:00.5: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2434 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20376.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
Preparing report for the candidate 20376_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20507_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 20507_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 20526_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20536_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 20536_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20544_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 20544_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20547_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 20547_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:38:16.56 +02:08:43.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:47.048 -01:58:56.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:49.897 -01:58:25.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 26852 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4090519.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
### Converted positions of 27101 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4090509.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
### Converted positions of 31985 stars ###
### Converted positions of 33877 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4090531.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4090554.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:47.048 -01:58:56.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:47.048 -01:58:56.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0551 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:49.897 -01:58:25.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:49.897 -01:58:25.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0691 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:47.048 -01:58:56.57
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:49.897 -01:58:25.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01467 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DABdOk4gVq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.guAvFO6rjO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ovl8wsmcwo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Vd7ifv3rD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3410 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3410 deg
Loaded 3861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3362 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3362 out of 31985 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.652600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.652600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3410 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3410 deg
Loaded 3861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3362 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3362 out of 31985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg
Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
3.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
3.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DABdOk4gVq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1557, passed=31965
Got 31965 stars (including 30362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=221 n_q2=231 n_q3=239 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.451
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.guAvFO6rjO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1524, passed=33848
Got 33848 stars (including 32278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=216 n_q2=238 n_q3=228 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ovl8wsmcwo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=909, passed=26843
Got 26843 stars (including 25899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=231 n_q2=206 n_q3=255 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0Vd7ifv3rD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=908, passed=27094
Got 27094 stars (including 26149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27094 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=229 n_q2=206 n_q3=257 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-48-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_003010_TTUQ1b1x1_3979988_afrPlCAl/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:32:09.66 -07:06:15.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:33:58.47 -07:05:21.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:05.43 +03:01:29.6: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:08:44.01 +01:33:49.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:06:29.66 -00:07:39.4: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:17.30 +00:42:43.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:11.71 -06:32:51.1: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:32.45 -05:36:47.4: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:32:09.66 -07:06:15.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:09.66 -07:06:15.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:33:58.47 -07:05:21.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:58.47 -07:05:21.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:05.43 +03:01:29.6: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:05.43 +03:01:29.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4669 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:08:44.01 +01:33:49.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:22.72 -04:08:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:36.32 -03:18:31.9: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:06:29.66 -00:07:39.4: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:29.66 -00:07:39.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6584 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:11.71 -06:32:51.1: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:32.45 -05:36:47.4: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:17.30 +00:42:43.4: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:32.45 -05:36:47.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0280 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:11.71 -06:32:51.1: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8815 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:22.72 -04:08:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:22.72 -04:08:03.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:36.32 -03:18:31.9: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:36.32 -03:18:31.9: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9948 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:05.71 -05:44:01.1: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:37.89 +02:12:38.7: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:15.67 -05:29:36.8: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:05.71 -05:44:01.1: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:37.89 +02:12:38.7: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:03.66 -03:59:06.1: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:39:58.74 +03:03:52.2: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:05.71 -05:44:01.1: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2767 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:37.89 +02:12:38.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1217 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:15.67 -05:29:36.8: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:15.67 -05:29:36.8: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1594 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:24.51 -06:34:31.2: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:03.91 -02:09:44.2: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:35:42.48 -00:26:32.1: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:58.74 +03:03:52.2: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:58.74 +03:03:52.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3690 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:03.66 -03:59:06.1: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:03.66 -03:59:06.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1922 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:24.51 -06:34:31.2: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:24.51 -06:34:31.2: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3504 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:03.91 -02:09:44.2: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:03.91 -02:09:44.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3220 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:35:42.48 -00:26:32.1: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:42.48 -00:26:32.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5409 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:35.86 -05:09:36.9: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:05.11 -05:41:11.5: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:33:12.63 -03:12:03.1: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:46.11 -05:31:06.5: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:21.59 -06:12:22.0: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:05.11 -05:41:11.5: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:35.86 -05:09:36.9: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:05.11 -05:41:11.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2373 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:35.86 -05:09:36.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2673 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:39:29.44 -06:03:43.7: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:52.03 +02:47:41.1: 15.20 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:33:12.63 -03:12:03.1: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:12.63 -03:12:03.1: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6020 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:00.94 +01:00:25.3: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:46.11 -05:31:06.5: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:46.11 -05:31:06.5: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4163 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:21.59 -06:12:22.0: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:21.59 -06:12:22.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3794 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:29.44 -06:03:43.7: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:52.03 +02:47:41.1: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:29.44 -06:03:43.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4334 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:52.03 +02:47:41.1: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5010 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:00.94 +01:00:25.3: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:00.94 +01:00:25.3: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5147 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:43:18.71 -06:25:39.7: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:36:33.97 -04:13:14.4: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:55:19.76 +02:51:22.6: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:43:18.71 -06:25:39.7: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:46:23.23 +02:12:17.5: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:43:18.71 -06:25:39.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4558 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:36:33.97 -04:13:14.4: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:33.97 -04:13:14.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7111 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:49.16 -06:25:28.9: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:08.86 -01:18:18.9: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:55:19.76 +02:51:22.6: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:55:19.76 +02:51:22.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5678 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:22:54.18 -02:51:28.7: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:57:44.96 -04:33:26.0: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:46:23.23 +02:12:17.5: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:23.23 +02:12:17.5: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5446 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:08.86 -01:18:18.9: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:08.86 -01:18:18.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5227 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:49.16 -06:25:28.9: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:49.16 -06:25:28.9: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3408 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:22:54.18 -02:51:28.7: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:22:54.18 -02:51:28.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6881 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:57:44.96 -04:33:26.0: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:11.28 -03:09:39.6: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:57:44.96 -04:33:26.0: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7351 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:39:44.57 -06:27:35.9: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:39:59.29 -03:46:56.0: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:44.57 -06:27:35.9: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:11.28 -03:09:39.6: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:44.57 -06:27:35.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0609 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:59.29 -03:46:56.0: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:11.28 -03:09:39.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5938 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:59.29 -03:46:56.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6737 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28939.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54085.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54538.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53737_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 53737_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:24.91 +02:04:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53774_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 53774_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:16.56 +02:08:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54057_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:10.52 -06:19:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54085_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
Preparing report for the candidate 54085_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54120_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54120_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54217_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54217_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:33.42 +00:11:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54262_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54262_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54265_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54265_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:14:03.23 +02:50:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54269_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54269_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54303_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54303_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:37.65 -00:49:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54329_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54329_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54436_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54436_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:55.86 -05:02:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54485_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54485_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:52:36.25 -00:13:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54501_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54501_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54523_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54523_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54538_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
Preparing report for the candidate 54538_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54546_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54546_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54557_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54557_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54634_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54634_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54638_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54638_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54643_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54643_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54649_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54649_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54683_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54683_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54684_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54684_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54703_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54703_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54708_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54708_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54733_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54733_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54735_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54735_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54739_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54739_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54748_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54748_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54751_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54751_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54759_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54759_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54783_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54783_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54784_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54784_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54785_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54785_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54786_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54786_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54801_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54801_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54813_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54813_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54821_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54821_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54824_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54824_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54828_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54828_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54835_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 54835_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
Preparing report for the candidate 28939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23417_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 23417_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50056_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 50056_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22128_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098
The candidate 22128_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-49-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0098 did not pass the final checks
