This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 10.34 11:38:16.86 +02:08:42.1
264.78968 59.48596 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -1 1 1 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:38:16.86 +02:08:42.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:38:16.86 +02:08:42.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 11 38 16.86 +02 08 42.1 10.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,10.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 10.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 12.03 11:02:41.73 +05:10:16.8
248.36371 56.05249 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna -1 1 1 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:02:41.73 +05:10:16.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:02:41.73 +05:10:16.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 11 02 41.73 +05 10 16.8 12.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 12.11 11:23:33.16 +06:18:36.1
253.86347 60.51279 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele -0 0 0 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:33.16 +06:18:36.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:33.16 +06:18:36.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 11 23 33.16 +06 18 36.1 12.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 13.05 11:08:44.25 +01:33:47.2
254.67972 54.51379 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -1 1 1 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:08:44.25 +01:33:47.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:08:44.25 +01:33:47.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 11 08 44.25 +01 33 47.2 13.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 13.19 10:50:43.44 +04:17:21.4
246.01011 53.25552 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita -1 0 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:50:43.44 +04:17:21.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:50:43.44 +04:17:21.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 10 50 43.44 +04 17 21.4 13.2 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 13.52 11:16:13.81 +04:04:46.7
254.16558 57.63636 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea -1 -0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:16:13.81 +04:04:46.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:16:13.81 +04:04:46.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 11 16 13.81 +04 04 46.7 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 13.32 10:41:27.01 +07:20:50.6
239.59928 53.39677 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria -1 2 2 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:41:27.01 +07:20:50.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:41:27.01 +07:20:50.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 10 41 27.01 +07 20 50.6 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 13.79 11:36:18.79 +03:55:35.7
261.95106 60.67407 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda -1 -1 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:36:18.79 +03:55:35.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:36:18.79 +03:55:35.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 11 36 18.79 +03 55 35.7 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 13.66 11:03:23.49 +03:59:41.2
250.08030 55.36035 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia -1 1 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:03:23.49 +03:59:41.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:03:23.49 +03:59:41.2: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 11 03 23.49 +03 59 41.2 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 13.71 10:58:46.97 +10:30:49.1
239.57760 58.72065 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa -1 0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:58:46.97 +10:30:49.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:58:46.97 +10:30:49.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 10 58 46.97 +10 30 49.1 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 13.61 10:41:26.45 +07:26:12.8
239.47645 53.44833 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.136 Austria -1 0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:41:26.45 +07:26:12.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:41:26.45 +07:26:12.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 10 41 26.45 +07 26 12.8 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.2217 2461173.7217 14.11 11:01:16.51 +08:54:08.3
242.74136 58.23281 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope 1 2 2 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:16.51 +08:54:08.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:16.51 +08:54:08.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 13.2217* 11 01 16.51 +08 54 08.3 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.7217,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.2217 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461173.72208529 13.05.2026 05:19:38.169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6015
Objects passed selection criteria: 6013
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5880
Average stars matched: 5684 (96.6667 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 00:31:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461173.72208529 13.05.2026 05:19:38.169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 25
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29310
Objects passed selection criteria: 29247
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27330.2
Average stars matched: 26145.5 (95.6651 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 00:32:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.72139623
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 4710 high-SNR stars for plate solving
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits was not found.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 4739 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3965454.xyls"...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat from image00002.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3965456.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.011 +05:58:19.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6014 stars ###
### Converted positions of 5979 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3965897.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3965888.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3965454.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3965456.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 200.962 (1.89174e+87), 19 match, 0 conflict, 3 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.207,6.01837), pixel scale 5.97199 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++--+-++(best)----------------------------------------------------c-------------------------
log-odds ratio 200.829 (1.6548e+87), 19 match, 0 conflict, 3 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.218,6.02873), pixel scale 5.97203 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++--+-++(best)----------------------------------------------------c-------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3965454.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3965456.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3965454.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.196291, 6.024655) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:47.110, +06:01:28.759).
Field size: 15.7833 x 10.5681 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.453 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... Field: out3965456.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.207415, 6.035013) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:49.779, +06:02:06.048).
Field size: 15.7833 x 10.5682 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.453 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:31 fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:31 out3965454.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:31 fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:31 out3965456.wcs
Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits for reading... Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits)... done!
Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits (fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3965456.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3965454.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3965456.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.715 degrees of RA,Dec (167.207,6.03424)
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
log-odds ratio 200.829 (1.6548e+87), 19 match, 0 conflict, 3 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.218,6.02873), pixel scale 5.97203 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++--+-++(best)----------------------------------------------------c-------------------------
Reading file "./out3965454.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.715 degrees of RA,Dec (167.195,6.02388)
log-odds ratio 200.962 (1.89174e+87), 19 match, 0 conflict, 3 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.207,6.01837), pixel scale 5.97199 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++--+-++(best)----------------------------------------------------c-------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3965456.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3965456.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.208173, 6.034503) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:49.961, +06:02:04.211).
Field size: 15.7706 x 10.5716 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.446 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:31 fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:31 out3965456.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3965454.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3965454.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.197010, 6.024128) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:47.282, +06:01:26.862).
Field size: 15.7702 x 10.5714 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.447 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:31 fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:31 out3965454.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 19259 sources.
simplexy: found 19197 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.721, 955.217] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 30.9968 (2.89554e+13), 9 match, 0 conflict, 165 distractors, 9 index.
RA,Dec = (167.209,6.03528), pixel scale 5.98507 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+---------------------------+----++-------------------------------------------------------+-----
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
--> log-odds 30.9968
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 198.838 (2.26137e+86), 22 match, 1 conflict, 154 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.209,6.03528), pixel scale 5.98507 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++---------------+------+----+----++---+------+c-------++--------------++----+-------------+-----
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7209, 955.215] arcmin
--> log-odds 198.838
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 406.807 (4.72321e+176), 41 match, 1 conflict, 135 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (167.209,6.03528), pixel scale 5.98507 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--+-----+--+---+--++--+----+----++-+-+----+-+c-+-----++--------------++----+-------+-+---+--+-+
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 41.0172 (6.50915e+17), 9 match, 0 conflict, 173 distractors, 9 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,6.02491), pixel scale 5.98506 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------+--------------------+-+--+--------+-----------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10)
--> log-odds 41.0172
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 190.724 (6.7682e+82), 22 match, 1 conflict, 159 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,6.02491), pixel scale 5.98506 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+-----+--------------------+-++-+---+----+----+-----------------------+-------+----+c+------+--
--> log-odds 406.807
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 925.832 (inf), 90 match, 1 conflict, 121 distractors, 92 index.
RA,Dec = (167.209,6.03528), pixel scale 5.98507 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-+-++--++++--++-++++-++---+----++-++++--++++c++---++++---+-+--+-++--+++---++-++++-+++---+--+-+
--> log-odds 190.724
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 407.89 (1.3937e+177), 41 match, 1 conflict, 140 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,6.02491), pixel scale 5.98506 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----++----++--++-------++-----++-++-+---+--+-+-+--+---+-+-----------------+-------+----+c+-----++--
--> log-odds 925.832
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1815.56 (inf), 185 match, 0 conflict, 136 distractors, 189 index.
RA,Dec = (167.209,6.03528), pixel scale 5.98507 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+++++++++-++++++-++++++++++-++++--++++++++--++++++++++++++++++-+-++++++-+++++++++++++++++-+-++++++
--> log-odds 407.89
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 917.792 (inf), 89 match, 1 conflict, 115 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,6.02491), pixel scale 5.98506 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---++-+++--++-+-++++---+++++-+---++++-+-++++--++++--+---+-+----++--++++++--++++-+c+---+-++-+
--> log-odds 1815.56
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3264.12 (inf), 358 match, 0 conflict, 523 distractors, 364 index.
RA,Dec = (167.209,6.03528), pixel scale 5.98507 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 917.792
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1808.71 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 133 distractors, 188 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,6.02491), pixel scale 5.98506 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++--++++++++++-++++-+++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++--+++++++
--> log-odds 1808.71
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
--> log-odds 3264.12
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
log-odds ratio 3272.92 (inf), 359 match, 0 conflict, 595 distractors, 365 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,6.02491), pixel scale 5.98506 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6039.97 (inf), 717 match, 0 conflict, 748 distractors, 727 index.
RA,Dec = (167.209,6.03528), pixel scale 5.98507 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3272.92
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6048.35 (inf), 717 match, 0 conflict, 753 distractors, 727 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,6.02491), pixel scale 5.98506 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6039.97
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11080.3 (inf), 1432 match, 0 conflict, 3300 distractors, 1450 index.
RA,Dec = (167.209,6.03528), pixel scale 5.98507 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6048.35
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11123.1 (inf), 1433 match, 0 conflict, 1820 distractors, 1453 index.
RA,Dec = (167.198,6.02491), pixel scale 5.98506 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11080.3
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.207171, 6.035125) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:49.721, +06:02:06.451).
Field size: 15.7669 x 10.5705 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.443 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.new"...
--> log-odds 11123.1
Got 8 solutions.
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (167.196011, 6.024751) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:08:47.043, +06:01:29.105).
Field size: 15.7669 x 10.5703 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.443 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.new"...
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits'
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:49.508 +06:02:03.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits was not found.
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat from image00003.cat
### Converted positions of 5849 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3975152.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:46.830 +06:01:26.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5842 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3975343.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:46.830 +06:01:26.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:46.830 +06:01:26.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:49.508 +06:02:03.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:49.508 +06:02:03.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0712 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:46.830 +06:01:26.31
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:49.508 +06:02:03.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01519 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6r1KvFi6jf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EBpVofoaMU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w8sVOdpzsA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.67WFRbisft
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec +0.1921 to +11.6322 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec 0.1921 to 11.6322 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3233 out of 3365 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3365 out of 5979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
4.0 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
4.0 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6r1KvFi6jf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=6014
Got 6014 stars (including 5628 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=237 n_q2=269 n_q3=220 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EBpVofoaMU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, passed=5979
Got 5979 stars (including 5577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=235 n_q2=251 n_q3=238 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.w8sVOdpzsA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=256, passed=5842
Got 5842 stars (including 5579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5842 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=244 n_q2=250 n_q3=239 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.67WFRbisft (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=265, passed=5849
Got 5849 stars (including 5582 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=246 n_q2=248 n_q3=238 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:02:41.73 +05:10:16.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:05:37.64 +06:42:52.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:23:33.16 +06:18:36.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:04:08.47 +07:06:58.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:33:01.21 +09:37:21.2: 10.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:21.84 +01:09:26.4: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:05:28.79 +06:57:46.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:00:03.73 +05:49:08.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:38:16.86 +02:08:42.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:15:18.15 +08:14:22.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:23:33.16 +06:18:36.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:05:37.64 +06:42:52.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:02:41.73 +05:10:16.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:21.84 +01:09:26.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:37.64 +06:42:52.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2814 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:04:08.47 +07:06:58.3: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:33:01.21 +09:37:21.2: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:05:28.79 +06:57:46.2: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:38:16.86 +02:08:42.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:21.84 +01:09:26.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2226 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:15:18.15 +08:14:22.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:00:03.73 +05:49:08.1: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:08.47 +07:06:58.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3527 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:01.21 +09:37:21.2: ref_mag=11.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2741 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:28.79 +06:57:46.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2581 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:15:18.15 +08:14:22.1: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2622 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:03.73 +05:49:08.1: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3205 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:26:24.63 +03:28:52.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:12:59.55 +08:03:47.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:05:53.24 +06:10:47.4: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:14:46.99 +07:30:52.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:26:24.63 +03:28:52.7: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:24.63 +03:28:52.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3674 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:12:59.55 +08:03:47.2: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:59.55 +08:03:47.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3718 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:05:53.24 +06:10:47.4: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:53.24 +06:10:47.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3639 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:14:46.99 +07:30:52.1: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:14:46.99 +07:30:52.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4027 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20616.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20624.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20616_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 20616_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20618_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20618_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20624_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 20624_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20626_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 20626_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20628_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20628_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20629_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20629_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20630_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20631_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20633_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20634_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20635_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20635_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20636_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20637_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20637_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20639_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 20639_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:50.79 +05:27:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:38:16.86 +02:08:42.1
11:02:41.73 +05:10:16.8
11:23:33.16 +06:18:36.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits was not found.
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:46.830 +06:01:26.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:49.508 +06:02:03.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.011 +05:58:19.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 23169 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4018587.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 23348 stars ###
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4018581.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
### Converted positions of 31020 stars ###
### Converted positions of 32625 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4018622.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4018652.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:46.830 +06:01:26.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:46.830 +06:01:26.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:49.508 +06:02:03.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:49.508 +06:02:03.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0712 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:46.830 +06:01:26.31
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:49.508 +06:02:03.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01519 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gs8STCyi26
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cEUVJAXmHH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HZWt3CSc4z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2EEI98x0JD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.669100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.669100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 32625 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec +0.1922 to +11.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec 0.1922 to 11.6821 deg
Loaded 4428 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3126 out of 3432 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3432 out of 32625 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
3.6 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
3.6 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Gs8STCyi26 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1265, passed=31002
Got 31002 stars (including 29705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.519 n_q1=226 n_q2=276 n_q3=221 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cEUVJAXmHH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1301, passed=32613
Got 32613 stars (including 31248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=239 n_q2=251 n_q3=241 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HZWt3CSc4z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=789, passed=23163
Got 23163 stars (including 22356 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=247 n_q2=251 n_q3=238 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2EEI98x0JD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=770, passed=23341
Got 23341 stars (including 22547 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23341 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=249 n_q2=245 n_q3=238 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-18-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_002812_TTUQ1b1x1_3940790_9lmuEk6b/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:50:43.44 +04:17:21.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:41:08.41 +04:09:57.1: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:38:55.76 +04:57:16.8: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:16:13.81 +04:04:46.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:39:17.60 +09:22:43.0: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:08:44.25 +01:33:47.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:03:23.49 +03:59:41.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:36:18.79 +03:55:35.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:41:27.01 +07:20:50.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:38:55.76 +04:57:16.8: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:50:43.44 +04:17:21.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:41:08.41 +04:09:57.1: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:16:13.81 +04:04:46.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:55.76 +04:57:16.8: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4696 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:08.41 +04:09:57.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8905 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:39:17.60 +09:22:43.0: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:08:44.25 +01:33:47.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:17.60 +09:22:43.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2465 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:32:22.15 +04:39:09.3: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:41:27.01 +07:20:50.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:36:18.79 +03:55:35.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:03:23.49 +03:59:41.2: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:32:22.15 +04:39:09.3: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:22.15 +04:39:09.3: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9295 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:05:55.50 +01:12:39.0: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:58:46.97 +10:30:49.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:41:26.45 +07:26:12.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:05:55.50 +01:12:39.0: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:58:46.97 +10:30:49.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:41:26.45 +07:26:12.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:55.50 +01:12:39.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8020 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:16.51 +08:54:08.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:16.51 +08:54:08.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54522.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54528.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54530.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54531.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54538.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54547.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54482_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54482_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54490_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54490_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54491_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54491_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54496_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54496_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:16.84 +02:08:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54505_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54505_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:45.03 +01:57:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54506_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54506_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:02:41.72 +05:10:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54507_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54507_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:33.14 +06:18:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54518_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54518_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54522_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54522_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54526_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54526_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54528_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54528_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54529_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54529_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:07.91 +03:02:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54530_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54530_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54531_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54531_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54534_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54534_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54537_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54537_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54538_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54538_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54541_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 54541_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54547_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
Preparing report for the candidate 54547_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:50.78 +05:27:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05030_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124
The candidate 05030_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_00-19-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124 did not pass the final checks
