######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0 FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Leo-01-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 320342 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 320342 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 470.5140 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.8452 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1091.4867 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 498.0728 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1091.6189 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 497.9750 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.31978 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-12T23:56:10.7067258' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-13T04:56:10.7067258' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61173.2056794674 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-13T04:56:20.6102391' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61173.2057940974 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 149.995886270868 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 30.0002472722728 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.4802777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 280.076111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40117138191783 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29424 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29424 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 10.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.00104 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits :) Spent 0.638796 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-12T23:56:57.0708984' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-13T04:56:57.0708984' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61173.206216088 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-13T04:57:06.9750405' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61173.2063307292 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 149.995886322378 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 30.0002472582923 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.3230555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 280.154444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40495432687145 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29424 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29424 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 10.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.00104 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits :) Spent 0.688897 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.70579521 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits was not set. Trying to guess... It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits .... Determining astrometry method... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits .... Determining astrometry method... The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... Choosing aperture... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits was not set. Trying to guess... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 573 arcmin. Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits The guess is 573 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5358 high-SNR stars for plate solving /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5360 high-SNR stars for plate solving Generating wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat from image00001.cat Generating wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat from image00002.cat This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2954365.xyls"... Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2954367.xyls"... verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:59:57.516 +29:59:40.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 7299 stars ### 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 7322 stars ### '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2954960.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2954963.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2954365.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading file "./out2954367.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20). log-odds ratio 57.8419 (1.31946e+25), 10 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (150.098,30.0189), pixel scale 5.97413 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-++--+++--+--+-------+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2954365.solved to indicate this. Field: out2954365.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (150.097843, 30.020706) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:00:23.482, +30:01:14.543). Field size: 15.787 x 10.5635 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.51 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:16 fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:16 out2954365.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits)... done! Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20). log-odds ratio 56.5736 (3.71201e+24), 10 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (150.089,30.0085), pixel scale 5.97406 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++++---+++---++----------+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2954367.solved to indicate this. Field: out2954367.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (150.089248, 30.010219) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:00:21.419, +30:00:36.789). Field size: 15.787 x 10.5636 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.51 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:16 fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:16 out2954367.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2954365.xyls"... All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits (fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2954367.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2954365.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7167 degrees of RA,Dec (150.097,30.0199) log-odds ratio 57.8419 (1.31946e+25), 10 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (150.098,30.0189), pixel scale 5.97413 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-++--+++--+--+-------+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2954365.solved to indicate this. Field: out2954365.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (150.103778, 30.023146) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:00:24.907, +30:01:23.324). Field size: 15.7658 x 10.5761 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.481 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Reading file "./out2954367.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7167 degrees of RA,Dec (150.088,30.0094) log-odds ratio 56.5736 (3.71201e+24), 10 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (150.089,30.0085), pixel scale 5.97406 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++++---+++---++----------+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------ WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:16 fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:16 out2954365.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits)... done! done! Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2954367.solved to indicate this. Field: out2954367.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (150.095146, 30.012649) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:00:22.835, +30:00:45.535). Field size: 15.7661 x 10.5759 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.482 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:16 fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:16 out2954367.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 20879 sources. simplexy: found 21276 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.725, 955.276] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 5.81382 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 176.5 (4.4968e+76), 21 match, 0 conflict, 215 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (150.105,30.0239), pixel scale 5.98544 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-----+-----------+-----++----------+---------------------+-------+-+--+-----+----+--+---++--+ --> log-odds 176.5 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 414.178 (7.50143e+179), 45 match, 0 conflict, 191 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (150.105,30.0239), pixel scale 5.98544 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+--+-----+-----------++----++-+----+---+++------+-----+-+----+------++-+--++----++---+--++--+++++ --> log-odds 414.178 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 866.561 (inf), 95 match, 0 conflict, 170 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (150.105,30.0239), pixel scale 5.98544 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-++-++-++-+-++--++---+++----++-+-+-++---+++---++++++-+++-++---++++--+++-++-++--++++---+-+++--+++++ --> log-odds 866.561 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1664.57 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 152 distractors, 184 index. RA,Dec = (150.105,30.0239), pixel scale 5.98544 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++-+++-++++++-++++++++++++-+++++-++++++-+++-++-+-++++-+++++++-+++++++++-+++++++-+++++ --> log-odds 1664.57 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3120.95 (inf), 371 match, 0 conflict, 405 distractors, 372 index. RA,Dec = (150.105,30.0239), pixel scale 5.98544 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Solving... --> log-odds 3120.95 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5731.13 (inf), 737 match, 1 conflict, 1367 distractors, 742 index. RA,Dec = (150.105,30.0239), pixel scale 5.98544 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7251, 955.278] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 25.6421 (1.36841e+11), 8 match, 0 conflict, 203 distractors, 8 index. RA,Dec = (150.096,30.0134), pixel scale 5.98545 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+--------------------------+----------------------------+--+-----------------+-------+----------- fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) --> log-odds 25.6421 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 174.719 (7.57361e+75), 21 match, 0 conflict, 215 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (150.096,30.0134), pixel scale 5.98545 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-----------+--------------+-+---------+-------------+--+--+-----------------+--+----+--------+-- --> log-odds 174.719 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 412.055 (8.97615e+178), 45 match, 0 conflict, 191 distractors, 45 index. RA,Dec = (150.096,30.0134), pixel scale 5.98545 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+-+---------++---------+---+++---+----++--------+----++-+--+----------+-++-+-+--++--++--+-----+-- --> log-odds 5731.13 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 10152 (inf), 1427 match, 1 conflict, 2315 distractors, 1447 index. RA,Dec = (150.105,30.0239), pixel scale 5.98544 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 412.055 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 870.994 (inf), 95 match, 0 conflict, 186 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (150.096,30.0134), pixel scale 5.98545 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++++--++--+++-++--+--++-+-+++---++--+++++---+--+----++++-+++-+++-+---++++-+-+--++--+++++--+--++- --> log-odds 870.994 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1679.33 (inf), 185 match, 0 conflict, 194 distractors, 185 index. RA,Dec = (150.096,30.0134), pixel scale 5.98545 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++-++-+++-+++++-+++++-++++++++++++-+--++++++++++++-++-+++++++-++++++-+++++++++++++ --> log-odds 1679.33 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3149.31 (inf), 374 match, 0 conflict, 573 distractors, 374 index. RA,Dec = (150.096,30.0134), pixel scale 5.98545 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 10152 Got 7 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (150.102022, 30.022999) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:00:24.485, +30:01:22.797). Field size: 15.7667 x 10.5687 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.498 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.new"... --> log-odds 3149.31 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5765.53 (inf), 740 match, 1 conflict, 925 distractors, 743 index. RA,Dec = (150.096,30.0134), pixel scale 5.98545 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Generating wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits --> log-odds 5765.53 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 10206.6 (inf), 1429 match, 1 conflict, 2396 distractors, 1448 index. RA,Dec = (150.096,30.0134), pixel scale 5.98545 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:24.241 +30:01:20.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6561 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3014533.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits --> log-odds 10206.6 Got 8 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (150.093392, 30.012510) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:00:22.414, +30:00:45.037). Field size: 15.7669 x 10.5687 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.498 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Generating wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat from image00004.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:22.170 +30:00:42.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6595 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3015230.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:24.241 +30:01:20.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 Second-epoch image center 10:00:24.241 +30:01:20.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0890 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:22.170 +30:00:42.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 Second-epoch image center 10:00:22.170 +30:00:42.23 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0801 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:00:24.241 +30:01:20.00 Second-epoch second image center 10:00:22.170 +30:00:42.23 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01288 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F4FDxNCcbH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9FSp9CJMN8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nVMm52qZdQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yuokbznRPv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec +24.2125 to +35.3503 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec 24.2125 to 35.3503 deg Loaded 5549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4003 out of 4255 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4255 out of 7322 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.921700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.921700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec +24.2125 to +35.3503 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec 24.2125 to 35.3503 deg Loaded 5549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4003 out of 4255 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4255 out of 7322 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7299 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec +24.2059 to +35.3397 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec 24.2059 to 35.3397 deg Loaded 5551 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3994 out of 4263 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7299 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 2.2 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 4.2 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 4.2 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.F4FDxNCcbH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, passed=7322 Got 7322 stars (including 6763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7169 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=239 n_q2=209 n_q3=226 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.9FSp9CJMN8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=579, passed=7299 Got 7299 stars (including 6711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7299 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7139 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=245 n_q2=211 n_q3=224 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nVMm52qZdQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, passed=6561 Got 6561 stars (including 6297 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6561 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6407 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=232 n_q2=213 n_q3=200 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.yuokbznRPv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, passed=6595 Got 6595 stars (including 6326 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6595 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6456 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6456 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6456 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=235 n_q2=214 n_q3=201 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:58:11.99 +28:25:09.5: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:02:52.81 +28:54:56.7: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:58:11.99 +28:25:09.5: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:02:52.81 +28:54:56.7: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:58:11.99 +28:25:09.5: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4507 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:52.81 +28:54:56.7: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4991 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 20339_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 10:26:31.22 +34:18:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 20340_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 12.19 10:26:31.23 +34:18:36.7 1686 0296 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 10:34:47.33 +34:23:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20618_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 20618_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 11.39 10:34:47.33 +34:23:00.7 0652 0107 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 12.44 09:58:11.97 +28:25:09.6 5021 4175 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20626_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 20626_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 12.46 09:58:12.02 +28:25:09.3 5017 4169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 12.48 10:02:52.80 +28:54:56.7 4423 3839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07076_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 07076_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 12.53 10:02:52.81 +28:54:56.6 4419 3832 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.20 +34:55:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01311_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 01311_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 7.80 09:53:43.21 +34:55:33.6 5794 0275 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 10:02:40.90 +26:41:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06231_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 06231_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 10.31 10:02:40.90 +26:41:37.7 4355 5172 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.49 +34:30:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits was not set. Trying to guess... It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. The guess is 605 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits was not found. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits was not found. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 573 arcmin. '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 573 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Generating wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat from image00004.cat Generating wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat from image00003.cat Generating wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat from image00001.cat Generating wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat from image00002.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:22.170 +30:00:42.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:24.241 +30:01:20.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:59:57.516 +29:59:40.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 25399 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 25342 stars ### '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3043935.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3043922.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits ### Converted positions of 38207 stars ### ### Converted positions of 38198 stars ### 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3044126.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3044117.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:24.241 +30:01:20.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 Second-epoch image center 10:00:24.241 +30:01:20.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0890 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:22.170 +30:00:42.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 Second-epoch image center 10:00:22.170 +30:00:42.23 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0801 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:00:24.241 +30:01:20.00 Second-epoch second image center 10:00:22.170 +30:00:42.23 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01288 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dnLP1ZlIhP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oZUy96kVZx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TYm3567TWQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.knYEkOyeT7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 38207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec +24.1997 to +35.3652 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec 24.1997 to 35.3652 deg Loaded 5570 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3855 out of 4322 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38207 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56 Discovery image 3 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 7.84 09:45:34.49 +34:30:39.2 6797 0561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 38207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec +24.1997 to +35.3652 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec 24.1997 to 35.3652 deg Loaded 5570 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3855 out of 4322 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38207 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 38198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec +24.1770 to +35.3601 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec 24.1770 to 35.3601 deg Loaded 5577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3842 out of 4322 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38198 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 3.8 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 3.8 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dnLP1ZlIhP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1809, passed=38184 Got 38184 stars (including 36309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38184 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37521 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37520 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37518 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=238 n_q2=210 n_q3=224 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.oZUy96kVZx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1825, passed=38173 Got 38173 stars (including 36282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38173 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37462 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37463 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37462 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=243 n_q2=211 n_q3=218 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.TYm3567TWQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=960, passed=25337 Got 25337 stars (including 24360 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25337 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24705 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24704 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24704 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=230 n_q2=209 n_q3=203 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.knYEkOyeT7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=946, passed=25388 Got 25388 stars (including 24420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25388 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=231 n_q2=209 n_q3=201 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.363 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:32:10.55 +26:22:00.9: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:23:50.13 +25:06:02.0: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:27:31.72 +34:42:13.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:57:06.68 +32:50:30.6: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:25:24.35 +30:36:54.5: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:09:15.00 +33:12:18.0: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:11:44.31 +27:06:23.1: 15.79 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:32:10.55 +26:22:00.9: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:23:50.13 +25:06:02.0: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:27:31.72 +34:42:13.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:27:31.72 +34:42:13.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:50.13 +25:06:02.0: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1366 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:32:10.55 +26:22:00.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1298 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:57:06.68 +32:50:30.6: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:06.68 +32:50:30.6: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9703 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:25:24.35 +30:36:54.5: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:25:24.35 +30:36:54.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8662 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:19:08.57 +34:40:30.6: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:09:15.00 +33:12:18.0: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:15.00 +33:12:18.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1057 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:11:44.31 +27:06:23.1: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:44.31 +27:06:23.1: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9650 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:19:08.57 +34:40:30.6: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:08.57 +34:40:30.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9203 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52578_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 14.26 09:32:10.64 +26:21:59.2 8488 5528 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52579_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 14.06 09:32:10.45 +26:22:02.6 8484 5521 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 14.39 10:23:50.20 +25:06:03.0 1398 5900 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52582_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 14.03 10:23:50.06 +25:06:01.0 1394 5893 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 14.24 09:57:06.57 +32:50:31.6 5309 1523 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52585_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 13.85 09:57:06.79 +32:50:29.7 5305 1516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 14.07 09:25:24.32 +30:36:55.6 9379 2938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52586_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 13.77 09:25:24.38 +30:36:53.3 9375 2932 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:26:26.50 +28:17:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52590_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52590_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 13.61 09:26:26.39 +28:17:56.9 9257 4344 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:26:03.80 +34:37:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52591_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 13.33 09:26:03.82 +34:37:17.2 9256 0489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:26:47.81 +27:43:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52592_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 12.56 09:26:47.82 +27:43:24.9 9213 4695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 10:34:45.90 +34:22:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 52628_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 11.45 10:34:45.91 +34:22:37.5 0654 0112 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 9.68 09:27:31.71 +34:42:13.3 9074 0449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 53071_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 9.66 09:27:31.72 +34:42:13.3 9070 0443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:29:39.69 +27:23:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 53311_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 13.17 09:29:39.65 +27:23:43.9 8825 4896 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 10:36:42.26 +34:09:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 53473_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 13.92 10:36:42.29 +34:09:08.4 0390 0211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 14.15 10:09:15.06 +33:12:17.5 3793 1200 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53498_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 53498_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 14.07 10:09:14.95 +33:12:18.5 3789 1193 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 10:05:00.64 +29:44:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53499_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 53499_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 14.06 10:05:00.82 +29:44:38.6 4174 3316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 10:22:23.06 +30:48:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53686_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 53686_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 14.33 10:22:22.98 +30:48:31.4 1975 2471 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 14.97 10:11:44.32 +27:06:22.7 3164 4840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23757_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 23757_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 14.95 10:11:44.31 +27:06:23.4 3159 4833 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.20 +34:55:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50025_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 50025_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 7.75 09:53:43.20 +34:55:33.8 5794 0275 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits Discovery image 2 2026 05 13.20580 2461173.70580 13.92 10:19:08.55 +34:40:31.3 2636 0192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06400_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 06400_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 13.92 10:19:08.59 +34:40:29.9 2632 0185 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 10:02:40.94 +26:41:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24770_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 24770_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 10.39 10:02:40.94 +26:41:37.3 4355 5172 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.49 +34:30:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25373_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 The candidate 25373_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 7.81 09:45:34.48 +34:30:39.0 6797 0561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits **** FOUND 09:39:25.83 +34:14:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461173.70579521 -observatory V36 03:11:57.94 +17:45:11.3 Mercury (-2.2mag) 05:27:34.40 +24:37:28.4 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:34:58.48 +09:02:47.6 Mars (1.2mag) 07:28:27.52 +22:16:58.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:40:35.02 +01:58:24.3 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:53:55.02 +20:06:52.3 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:14:02.31 +00:04:26.8 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:13.17 -22:56:29.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 00:06:21.68 +02:30:41.9 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 13 00:16 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461173.70579521: 07:28:34.68 +22:16:39.6 Io (5.9mag) 07:28:17.74 +22:17:22.2 Europa (6.1mag) 07:28:40.45 +22:16:30.9 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:28:03.88 +22:18:01.1 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:30:20.11 +21:55:12.2 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:28:24.57 +22:17:06.3 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:30:47.89 +22:21:31.6 Elara (17.4mag) 07:29:08.21 +22:42:40.2 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:36:02.35 +22:17:00.9 Carme (18.7mag) 00:40:46.73 +01:58:16.8 Titan (8.7mag) 00:40:32.93 +01:58:25.6 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:40:27.43 +01:56:35.3 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:40:24.09 +01:58:41.7 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:41:46.82 +02:03:56.2 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 13 00:16 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461173.70579521: 17:01:40.25 -29:52:01.2 JWST 16:51:17.48 +47:01:04.2 Chandra 18:18:56.50 -31:23:40.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 13 00:16 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461173.70579521 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 67 May 13 00:16 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 13 00:16 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 13 00:16 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 16:29:59.999 -11:56:47.82 AT 2026lqk 2026-05-07.34 19.7484 20:27:21.425 +83:01:37.26 AT 2026lqj 2026-05-08.31 19.889 10:36:13.003 -11:05:58.46 AT 2026lqi 2026-05-07.21 18.876 15:48:00.654 +16:46:23.35 AT 2026lqh 2026-05-06.03 20.03 14:09:34.482 +54:26:30.92 AT 2026lqg 2026-05-06.01 19.54 11:36:44.072 +07:14:34.91 AT 2026lqf 2026-05-07.27 19.909 11:50:54.655 +61:14:46.88 AT 2026lqe 2026-05-07.19 19.9549 08:08:30.782 +17:43:25.65 AT 2026lqd 2026-05-07.30 19.184 14:49:57.889 -13:06:09.83 AT 2026lqc 2026-05-07.37 19.424 12:47:29.648 +01:58:18.11 AT 2026lqb 2026-05-07.19 19.818 12:41:42.770 -17:46:00.00 AT 2026lqa 2026-05-07.67 17.69 14:59:35.556 -04:53:05.25 AT 2026lpz 2026-05-04.04 17.981 10:00:05.945 +11:34:48.39 AT 2026lpy 2026-05-02.17 19.606 09:24:01.028 +02:28:47.37 AT 2026lpx 2026-05-08.02 19.201 09:04:00.273 -08:22:58.60 AT 2026lpw 2026-05-08.02 19.371 08:19:26.710 +00:35:29.67 AT 2026lpv 2026-05-07.98 18.819 09:10:11.557 -08:23:38.47 AT 2026lpu 2026-05-08.02 18.758 11:58:59.820 +07:36:46.15 AT 2026lpt 2026-05-07.19 19.9615 06:45:50.210 +34:19:06.35 AT 2026lps 2026-04-29.16 19.0996 11:29:16.011 +57:03:30.62 AT 2026lpr 2026-05-07.24 19.9571 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 13 00:16 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 05 13.20633 2461173.70633 12.81 09:39:25.82 +34:14:50.6 7565 0733 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_001412_TTUQ1b1x1_2945980_XQMNTgaH/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-56-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
