This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1726 2461173.6726 13.94 07:58:50.38 +32:42:39.6
188.27023 27.61220 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.751 Faina -1 -0 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:50.38 +32:42:39.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:50.38 +32:42:39.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6726,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1726 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1726 2461173.6726 13.99 08:00:15.42 +29:02:56.4
192.31125 26.84243 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.432 Pythia -1 -1 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:00:15.42 +29:02:56.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:00:15.42 +29:02:56.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6726,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1726 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1726 2461173.6726 13.78 07:25:30.81 +29:51:03.5
188.79238 19.95676 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.146 Lucina -0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:30.81 +29:51:03.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:30.81 +29:51:03.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6726,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1726 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1726 2461173.6726 14.45 08:16:42.33 +29:59:22.1
192.45621 30.53985 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.186 Celuta -2 -1 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:16:42.33 +29:59:22.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:16:42.33 +29:59:22.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6726,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1726 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461173.67287905 13.05.2026 04:08:46.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14073
Objects passed selection criteria: 14060
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12516
Average stars matched: 12237.5 (97.7748 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 00:12:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461173.67287905 13.05.2026 04:08:46.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 147
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 79581
Objects passed selection criteria: 79397
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 71519.8
Average stars matched: 69257.5 (96.8369 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1934540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 13 00:14:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.67228736
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 9977 high-SNR stars for plate solving
The guess is 570 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 10024 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2800715.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat from image00001.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2800714.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:07.765 +30:02:10.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14578 stars ###
### Converted positions of 14611 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2801172.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2801181.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2800715.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out2800714.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 61.4628 (4.93145e+26), 45 match, 1 conflict, 149 distractors, 179 index.
RA,Dec = (120.035,30.0493), pixel scale 5.93986 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--+++----+--------++--+++----+----+---+---++----++----c---+----++--+-+----+---+---+-+----+----+
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2800715.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field: out2800715.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (120.066177, 30.029813) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (08:00:15.882, +30:01:47.328).
Field size: 15.7946 x 10.5736 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.561 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... log-odds ratio 58.2857 (2.05658e+25), 40 match, 1 conflict, 115 distractors, 178 index.
RA,Dec = (120.045,30.0576), pixel scale 5.93996 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--+++----+--------++--+++----+----+---+---++----++----c---+----++--+-+----+---+---+-+----+----+
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2800714.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2800714.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (120.076234, 30.038217) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (08:00:18.296, +30:02:17.580).
Field size: 15.7946 x 10.5736 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.56 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:12 fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:12 out2800715.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:12 fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:12 out2800714.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2800715.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2800714.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2800714.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7267 degrees of RA,Dec (120.075,30.0374)
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
log-odds ratio 91.6444 (6.31904e+39), 13 match, 0 conflict, 21 distractors, 26 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0374), pixel scale 5.97627 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---+--++++-+--+-+-+-+-+---------+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out2800715.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7267 degrees of RA,Dec (120.065,30.029)
log-odds ratio 30.1414 (1.23096e+13), 4 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (120.068,30.0182), pixel scale 5.96003 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+----+-++(best)-------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2800714.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2800714.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (120.077615, 30.037795) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (08:00:18.628, +30:02:16.061).
Field size: 15.7773 x 10.5781 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.567 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2800715.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2800715.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (120.067561, 30.030046) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (08:00:16.215, +30:01:48.165).
Field size: 15.7776 x 10.5696 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.561 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:12 fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:12 out2800714.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 13 00:12 fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 13 00:12 out2800715.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 45497 sources.
simplexy: found 45045 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7156, 955.136] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 68.7198 (6.99248e+29), 17 match, 0 conflict, 293 distractors, 19 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0386), pixel scale 5.98456 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------------------+-------+-----+-+-----------------------+---------------++--------------+-
--> log-odds 68.7198
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 142.432 (7.20334e+61), 23 match, 0 conflict, 287 distractors, 26 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0386), pixel scale 5.98456 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+----+-------------+-------+-----+-+-----------------------+---------------++--------------+-
Solving...
--> log-odds 142.432
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 316.971 (4.5591e+137), 43 match, 0 conflict, 406 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0386), pixel scale 5.98456 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+----+---------+---+-------+-----+-+---------+------------++++----+--------++--------------+-
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7109, 955.064] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 74.6959 (2.7543e+32), 17 match, 0 conflict, 300 distractors, 19 index.
RA,Dec = (120.069,30.0308), pixel scale 5.98411 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+------+---------------+--------+------------------------+-----------+---+---+----------+---------
--> log-odds 316.971
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 639.757 (6.9679e+277), 75 match, 0 conflict, 398 distractors, 81 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0386), pixel scale 5.98456 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+--+-+---------+---+-+-----+----++-+---+-----+------------++++----+-+------++-------------++-
--> log-odds 74.6959
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 145.995 (2.54004e+63), 23 match, 0 conflict, 294 distractors, 26 index.
RA,Dec = (120.069,30.0308), pixel scale 5.98411 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-+----+----------+----+--------+------------------------+-----------+---+---+----------+--------+
--> log-odds 639.757
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 145.995
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
log-odds ratio 1661.77 (inf), 177 match, 0 conflict, 416 distractors, 185 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0386), pixel scale 5.98456 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++++++-+++--++++--++---++++-++++--++++-++--+-+-+++--++--+---+-++++---++-+----+-++---++-+++----+++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 288.257 (1.54328e+125), 41 match, 0 conflict, 352 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (120.069,30.0308), pixel scale 5.98411 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-+----+----------+-+--+--------+-----------------+------+--------+--+---+---+----------+----+---+
--> log-odds 288.257
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 554.645 (7.5763e+240), 70 match, 0 conflict, 387 distractors, 82 index.
RA,Dec = (120.069,30.0308), pixel scale 5.98411 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-+----+--+-------+-+--+-+---+--+-+-----++--------+------+--+-----+--+---+---+-----+---++----+-+++
--> log-odds 554.645
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1368.71 (inf), 160 match, 0 conflict, 449 distractors, 187 index.
RA,Dec = (120.069,30.0308), pixel scale 5.98411 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++---+--+--+-+--+-++-+++---+-+++++-+-+++--++-+-+++---+-+--++-+-++--+---++----+---+++-+++---+++++
--> log-odds 1661.77
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3242.11 (inf), 358 match, 0 conflict, 515 distractors, 369 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0386), pixel scale 5.98456 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+++++++-++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++-+++-+++--+-++++++++++++--++-+++-+++++++---++++
--> log-odds 1368.71
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2684.47 (inf), 316 match, 0 conflict, 509 distractors, 371 index.
RA,Dec = (120.069,30.0308), pixel scale 5.98411 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++-+-+-++-++--+++-++-++++--+-+++++++-++++-++-++++-++-+-+++++-+++++++-++++----+++++++-+++++-+++++
--> log-odds 3242.11
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6000.27 (inf), 713 match, 1 conflict, 1085 distractors, 724 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0386), pixel scale 5.98456 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++c+++++++++++++-++++
--> log-odds 2684.47
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 4937.56 (inf), 625 match, 0 conflict, 893 distractors, 726 index.
RA,Dec = (120.069,30.0308), pixel scale 5.98411 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++-+-+-++-++-++++-++-++++-++-+++++++-++++-++-++++-++-+-+++++-+++++++-++++++--+++++++-+++++++++++
--> log-odds 6000.27
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11007 (inf), 1427 match, 1 conflict, 1972 distractors, 1454 index.
RA,Dec = (120.079,30.0386), pixel scale 5.98456 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++c+++++++++++++-++++
--> log-odds 4937.56
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 9062.75 (inf), 1244 match, 0 conflict, 1575 distractors, 1455 index.
RA,Dec = (120.069,30.0308), pixel scale 5.98411 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++-+-+-++-++-++++-++-++++-++-+++++++-++++-++-++++-++-+-+++++-+++++++-++++++--+++++++-+++++++++++
--> log-odds 11007
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (120.076786, 30.038034) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (08:00:18.429, +30:02:16.921).
Field size: 15.7756 x 10.5723 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.559 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
--> log-odds 9062.75
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (120.066704, 30.029612) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (08:00:16.009, +30:01:46.604).
Field size: 15.7757 x 10.5722 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.559 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.new"...
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:18.185 +30:02:14.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
### Converted positions of 10576 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat from image00004.cat
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2882101.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:15.765 +30:01:43.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10604 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2883877.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:18.185 +30:02:14.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:18.185 +30:02:14.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0371 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:15.765 +30:01:43.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:15.765 +30:01:43.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:18.185 +30:02:14.11
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:15.765 +30:01:43.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MFBkCRyvtt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v6LKvR12Ji
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hVsVXeN27y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RJFWOySNV9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3044 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3044 deg
Loaded 9463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7187 out of 7676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7676 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MFBkCRyvtt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=222 n_q2=286 n_q3=200 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v6LKvR12Ji (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=225 n_q2=287 n_q3=197 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hVsVXeN27y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, passed=10576
Got 10576 stars (including 10011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10576 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=220 n_q2=269 n_q3=226 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RJFWOySNV9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, passed=10604
Got 10604 stars (including 10067 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10604 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=219 n_q2=265 n_q3=226 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:44.86 +31:46:25.7: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:44.86 +31:46:25.7: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:44.86 +31:46:25.7: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2771 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20775_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 20775_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:11.18 +24:47:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20942_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 20942_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:07.04 +34:13:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20968_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 20968_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:29.72 +27:17:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21041_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 21041_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Generating wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:18.185 +30:02:14.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:15.765 +30:01:43.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:07.765 +30:02:10.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 60478 stars ###
### Converted positions of 59654 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2907597.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2907587.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
### Converted positions of 84140 stars ###
### Converted positions of 84052 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2907696.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2907689.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:18.185 +30:02:14.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:18.185 +30:02:14.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0371 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:15.765 +30:01:43.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:15.765 +30:01:43.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:18.185 +30:02:14.11
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:15.765 +30:01:43.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dKe3iAybit
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AHxjLuSLw7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lQDfntcmpk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LEQRICBzFD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3113 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3113 deg
Loaded 9485 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6460 out of 7793 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7793 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 137 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dKe3iAybit (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6475, passed=84011
Got 84011 stars (including 77428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=233 n_q2=286 n_q3=193 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AHxjLuSLw7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6514, passed=84099
Got 84099 stars (including 77496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=230 n_q2=290 n_q3=191 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lQDfntcmpk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2931, passed=60465
Got 60465 stars (including 57443 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60465 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=229 n_q2=261 n_q3=230 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LEQRICBzFD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2729, passed=59647
Got 59647 stars (including 56833 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59647 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=227 n_q2=260 n_q3=227 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-07-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001012_TTUQ1b1x1_2795041_YKkrKuMX/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:13:14.79 +30:50:14.6: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:27:17.39 +29:11:22.8: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:29:13.54 +33:31:45.8: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:20:14.17 +25:21:49.3: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:12:08.28 +30:12:42.5: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:13:14.79 +30:50:14.6: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:13:14.79 +30:50:14.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3566 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:23.64 +24:41:20.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:27:17.39 +29:11:22.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:17.39 +29:11:22.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7403 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:49:42.58 +25:07:06.9: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:12.80 +33:12:32.8: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:21:21.39 +34:14:17.7: 14.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:29:13.54 +33:31:45.8: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:13.54 +33:31:45.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2101 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:26:48.97 +34:11:12.0: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:20:14.17 +25:21:49.3: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:12:08.28 +30:12:42.5: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:12:08.28 +30:12:42.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2245 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:14.17 +25:21:49.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3033 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:23.64 +24:41:20.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:23.64 +24:41:20.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:21:21.39 +34:14:17.7: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:49:42.58 +25:07:06.9: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:21:21.39 +34:14:17.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5586 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:42.58 +25:07:06.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2139 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:26:48.97 +34:11:12.0: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:48.97 +34:11:12.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6397 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:12.80 +33:12:32.8: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:12.80 +33:12:32.8: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0571 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:35:32.84 +34:59:35.7: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:26:26.58 +31:58:53.3: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:35:32.84 +34:59:35.7: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:32.84 +34:59:35.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5880 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:26:26.58 +31:58:53.3: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:26.58 +31:58:53.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9690 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:44.90 +31:46:25.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:44.90 +31:46:25.7: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:44.90 +31:46:25.7: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2928 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:20:25.95 +26:46:30.2: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:28:40.79 +28:18:40.2: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:20:25.95 +26:46:30.2: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:25.95 +26:46:30.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1606 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:36.24 +25:32:12.5: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:28:40.79 +28:18:40.2: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:28:40.79 +28:18:40.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2836 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:50.35 +27:00:52.6: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:35.46 +29:29:34.6: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:36.24 +25:32:12.5: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:36.24 +25:32:12.5: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4974 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:50.35 +27:00:52.6: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:50.35 +27:00:52.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5553 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:31:47.07 +26:13:17.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:35.46 +29:29:34.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:35.46 +29:29:34.6: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2233 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:05:36.55 +28:16:39.3: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:31:47.07 +26:13:17.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:47.07 +26:13:17.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4245 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:26:19.63 +33:17:38.0: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:05:36.55 +28:16:39.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:05:36.55 +28:16:39.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6743 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:14.47 +26:30:37.0: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:04.21 +32:25:54.6: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:25:55.73 +30:15:37.8: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:05:20.49 +28:15:01.6: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:26:19.63 +33:17:38.0: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:19.63 +33:17:38.0: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3168 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:54.10 +29:37:49.3: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:14.47 +26:30:37.0: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:14.47 +26:30:37.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6116 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:09:48.66 +28:07:51.9: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:05:20.49 +28:15:01.6: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:25:55.73 +30:15:37.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:04.21 +32:25:54.6: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:55.73 +30:15:37.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8306 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:05:20.49 +28:15:01.6: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7873 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:04.21 +32:25:54.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7603 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:23:34.84 +25:04:05.8: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:31:37.68 +34:12:15.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:54.10 +29:37:49.3: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:54.10 +29:37:49.3: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9455 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:09:48.66 +28:07:51.9: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:48.66 +28:07:51.9: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8400 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:23:34.84 +25:04:05.8: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:23:34.84 +25:04:05.8: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9854 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:31:37.68 +34:12:15.7: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:37.68 +34:12:15.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6035 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:37.96 +33:30:54.8: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:32:40.52 +27:30:30.4: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:07:46.20 +26:54:54.1: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:01.08 +29:51:48.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:37.96 +33:30:54.8: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:37.96 +33:30:54.8: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6375 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:26.68 +30:13:15.4: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:50.38 +32:42:39.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:07:46.20 +26:54:54.1: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:32:40.52 +27:30:30.4: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:07:46.20 +26:54:54.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0236 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:32:40.52 +27:30:30.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0930 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:00:15.42 +29:02:56.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:01.08 +29:51:48.1: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:01.08 +29:51:48.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1220 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:26.68 +30:13:15.4: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:50.38 +32:42:39.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:25:30.81 +29:51:03.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:26.68 +30:13:15.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9965 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:06:55.30 +31:33:32.3: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:00:15.42 +29:02:56.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:21.99 +28:17:46.9: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:25:30.81 +29:51:03.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:49:34.75 +25:06:27.8: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:06:55.30 +31:33:32.3: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:06:55.30 +31:33:32.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1438 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:21.99 +28:17:46.9: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:21.99 +28:17:46.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2948 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:49:34.75 +25:06:27.8: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:49:34.75 +25:06:27.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0477 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:19.89 +27:34:42.0: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:18:18.72 +26:23:06.2: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:31:21.10 +31:11:56.4: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:19.89 +27:34:42.0: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:19.89 +27:34:42.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3120 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:54:53.49 +30:47:34.0: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:18:18.72 +26:23:06.2: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:18:18.72 +26:23:06.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4106 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:31:21.10 +31:11:56.4: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:21.10 +31:11:56.4: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5843 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:38:18.55 +34:29:56.5: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:54:53.49 +30:47:34.0: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:53.49 +30:47:34.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2071 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:26:27.66 +29:33:13.3: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:16:42.33 +29:59:22.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:38:18.55 +34:29:56.5: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:18.55 +34:29:56.5: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1427 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:32:45.39 +28:40:25.1: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:59.93 +25:09:34.9: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:26:27.66 +29:33:13.3: 14.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:27.66 +29:33:13.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5850 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:16:42.33 +29:59:22.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:32:45.39 +28:40:25.1: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:23:06.27 +24:42:49.3: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:32:45.39 +28:40:25.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4995 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:59.93 +25:09:34.9: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:59.93 +25:09:34.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6281 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:25.19 +28:50:27.0: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:26:38.23 +27:57:24.2: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:23:06.27 +24:42:49.3: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:23:06.27 +24:42:49.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5160 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:27:58.97 +29:19:46.6: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:25.19 +28:50:27.0: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:25.19 +28:50:27.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5870 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:26:38.23 +27:57:24.2: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:38.23 +27:57:24.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6871 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:25:51.44 +25:16:25.0: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:30:02.18 +35:00:47.7: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:27:58.97 +29:19:46.6: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:27:58.97 +29:19:46.6: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8237 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:25:51.44 +25:16:25.0: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:51.44 +25:16:25.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7574 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:30:02.18 +35:00:47.7: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:02.18 +35:00:47.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3388 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:09:05.64 +33:10:46.4: 15.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:09:05.64 +33:10:46.4: 15.55 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:05.64 +33:10:46.4: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8987 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101638.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101640.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102131.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100531_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100531_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100538_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100538_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100539_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100539_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100547_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100547_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100548_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100548_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:35.93 +34:24:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100549_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100549_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100551_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100551_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100552_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100552_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100553_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100553_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100555_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100555_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100556_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100556_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100557_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100557_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:13.68 +34:16:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100558_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100558_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:50.30 +31:33:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100559_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100559_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:00.73 +30:09:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100561_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100561_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:47.81 +27:35:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100681_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100681_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.08 +31:52:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100732_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100732_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:07.04 +34:13:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100758_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100758_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:29.74 +27:17:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100820_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100820_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100856_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100856_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:15.54 +26:14:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100914_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100914_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:37.15 +32:14:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100922_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100922_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:00.22 +26:26:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100926_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100926_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:34.97 +26:43:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100996_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 100996_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:14.21 +33:29:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101029_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101029_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.30 +25:56:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101036_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101036_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.69 +31:51:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101045_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101045_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101077_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101077_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:50.77 +34:00:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101082_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101082_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:55.84 +30:20:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101085_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101085_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:10.46 +29:28:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101088_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101088_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:11.94 +31:29:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101096_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101096_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101106_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101106_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:16.88 +28:49:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101107_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101107_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:58.57 +28:34:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101113_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101113_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:02.37 +28:27:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101133_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101133_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:00.37 +34:23:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101141_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101141_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:06.00 +27:04:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101152_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101152_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101156_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101156_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.38 +25:02:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101165_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101165_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:33.31 +30:37:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101183_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101183_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:59.52 +27:14:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101208_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101208_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:52.44 +27:05:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101209_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101209_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101246_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101246_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101284_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101284_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:53.60 +28:30:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101300_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101300_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.01 +31:10:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101302_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101302_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:06.97 +28:01:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101314_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101314_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:29.88 +34:51:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:45.46 +25:43:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101320_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101320_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101323_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101323_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:49.29 +29:44:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101331_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101331_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.80 +27:56:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:12.09 +27:54:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101343_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101343_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101349_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101349_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:29.11 +25:13:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101356_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101356_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:16.01 +33:29:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101371_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101371_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:10.15 +34:24:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101377_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101377_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101394_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101394_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:55.07 +28:01:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101408_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101408_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:08.76 +34:08:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101410_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101410_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:42.91 +30:53:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101417_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101417_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:47.19 +28:58:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101421_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101421_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:05.99 +33:23:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101429_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101429_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:40.67 +27:30:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101430_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101430_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101436_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101436_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:47.75 +26:57:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101441_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101441_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101443_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101443_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101449_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101449_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101453_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101453_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:29.08 +25:31:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101455_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101455_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:01.50 +25:18:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101461_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101461_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:34.57 +27:12:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101462_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101462_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101475_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101475_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.35 +25:10:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101477_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101477_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101503_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101503_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101519_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101519_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:55.08 +25:04:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101525_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101525_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:46.83 +28:49:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101528_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101528_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:33.95 +34:37:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101533_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101533_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:17.34 +34:07:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101549_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101549_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:48.41 +34:02:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101553_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101553_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101561_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101561_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101573_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101573_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101580_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101580_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:30.51 +32:29:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101586_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101586_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101588_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
Preparing report for the candidate 101588_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101601_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101601_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:01.83 +32:55:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101603_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101603_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:36.42 +29:15:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101611_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101611_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.72 +32:11:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101638_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
Preparing report for the candidate 101638_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101640_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
Preparing report for the candidate 101640_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101673_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101673_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:46.51 +31:22:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101691_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101691_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101694_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101694_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101707_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101707_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:22.72 +28:48:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101711_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101711_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101714_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101714_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.71 +30:36:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101725_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101725_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:33.28 +25:57:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101743_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101743_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:30.19 +26:57:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101752_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101752_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.64 +30:13:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101759_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101759_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:07.87 +31:29:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101809_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101809_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:11.47 +32:23:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101813_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101813_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101831_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101831_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:01.22 +28:11:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101841_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101841_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101849_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101849_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:03.26 +29:19:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101876_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101876_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:38.21 +32:25:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101930_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101930_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101943_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101943_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101958_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101958_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101996_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 101996_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:07.28 +25:14:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102010_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102010_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:19.06 +27:57:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102041_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102041_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:36.62 +34:05:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102118_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102118_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102131_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
Preparing report for the candidate 102131_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102146_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102146_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102159_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102159_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102181_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102181_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:46.04 +30:39:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102195_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102195_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102242_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102242_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102291_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102291_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102306_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102306_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102427_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102427_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102437_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102437_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:03.64 +28:28:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102506_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 102506_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64703_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 64703_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:16.61 +25:53:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:27.50 +30:46:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01892_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 01892_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:52.72 +34:52:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 11699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.96 +33:22:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 56633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_23-08-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
