This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,7.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 7.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,7.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 7.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,7.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 7.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,7.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 7.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,7.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 7.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.9286+22.1603,2461173.6444,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.9286+22.1603 20260513.1444 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1444 2461173.6444 13.40 07:19:16.27 +22:16:44.7
195.62040 15.82157 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 2 1 2 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:16.27 +22:16:44.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:16.27 +22:16:44.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1444 2461173.6444 13.69 07:38:53.78 +22:47:03.6
196.96110 20.19943 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 -0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:53.78 +22:47:03.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:53.78 +22:47:03.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1444 2461173.6444 13.66 07:34:33.81 +17:53:07.4
201.31719 17.36612 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 1 2 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:33.81 +17:53:07.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:33.81 +17:53:07.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1444 2461173.6444 14.10 07:36:42.03 +22:48:56.5
196.72902 19.74171 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene -0 1 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:42.03 +22:48:56.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:42.03 +22:48:56.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1444 2461173.6444 14.29 07:41:39.08 +20:41:04.1
199.28904 20.00071 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 0 1 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:39.08 +20:41:04.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:39.08 +20:41:04.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1444 2461173.6444 14.44 07:36:37.57 +22:05:28.1
197.43465 19.45294 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.382 Dodona 1 0 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:37.57 +22:05:28.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:37.57 +22:05:28.1: 15.98 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.98 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1444 2461173.6444 14.95 07:40:44.13 +25:14:54.4
194.66940 21.48847 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.143 Adria -0 1 1 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:44.13 +25:14:54.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:44.13 +25:14:54.4: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,14.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 14.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6444,7.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1444 7.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461173.64469789 13.05.2026 03:28:11.898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13810
Objects passed selection criteria: 13789
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13713.5
Average stars matched: 12547.8 (91.4993 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 23:28:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461173.64469789 13.05.2026 03:28:11.898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 100
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95899
Objects passed selection criteria: 95692
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 93810.2
Average stars matched: 85549.8 (91.1945 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1899972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 23:31:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.64406697
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 13182 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 13115 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out592736.xyls"...
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out592739.xyls"...
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 22550 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 23656 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky593117.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky593111.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out592736.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 28.9404 (3.70402e+12), 10 match, 0 conflict, 33 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.872,22.0069), pixel scale 5.93122 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------------+-----+--++-+-----+--++-+-----+(best)--------+------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out592736.solved to indicate this.
Field: out592736.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.849809, 22.002207) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:23.954, +22:00:07.946).
Field size: 15.7342 x 10.5285 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.233 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Reading file "./out592739.axy"...
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 25.6467 (1.37472e+11), 9 match, 0 conflict, 34 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (110.875,22.0146), pixel scale 5.93121 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------------+-----+--++-+-----+-----+---+-+(best)--+-----+------------------------------------------------
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 23:28 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 23:28 out592736.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out592739.solved to indicate this.
Field: out592739.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.852688, 22.009996) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:24.645, +22:00:35.985).
Field size: 15.7348 x 10.529 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.23 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 23:28 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 23:28 out592739.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out592736.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out592739.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out592736.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6633 degrees of RA,Dec (110.849,22.0014)
log-odds ratio 130.931 (7.28926e+56), 16 match, 0 conflict, 17 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.849,22.0019), pixel scale 5.9501 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-++--++++-+------+++--+-+--+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out592739.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6633 degrees of RA,Dec (110.852,22.0092)
log-odds ratio 130.575 (5.10257e+56), 16 match, 0 conflict, 17 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.852,22.0096), pixel scale 5.9501 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++++---++++-+------++++---+--+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out592736.solved to indicate this.
Field: out592736.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.850986, 22.001694) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:24.237, +22:00:06.097).
Field size: 15.7115 x 10.5316 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.228 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 23:28 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 23:28 out592736.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out592739.solved to indicate this.
Field: out592739.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.853739, 22.009340) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:24.897, +22:00:33.625).
Field size: 15.7118 x 10.5317 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.225 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 23:28 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 23:28 out592739.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 59564 sources.
simplexy: found 58272 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4801, 951.606] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 16.906
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Solving...
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 132.463 (3.37371e+57), 25 match, 0 conflict, 568 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.855,22.0102), pixel scale 5.96244 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+---+-----+------+-----------+-----------+------+--------------++--------------+-----------------
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4791, 951.59] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 6.94993
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 111.56 (2.81852e+48), 24 match, 0 conflict, 585 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.852,22.0025), pixel scale 5.96234 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+------------+-----------+--++-------+------+----+--+----------------------------------------
--> log-odds 111.56
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
--> log-odds 132.463
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 330.696 (4.16193e+143), 43 match, 0 conflict, 566 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.852,22.0025), pixel scale 5.96234 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-++---+--------+-----------+-+++-----+-+------+--+-+--+------+--+---------------+--------------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 353.493 (3.31342e+153), 44 match, 0 conflict, 557 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.855,22.0102), pixel scale 5.96244 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+--++--++-+----+-+-----------+-----------+----+++--+-----------++-+-------+----+---------+-------
--> log-odds 330.696
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 789.003 (inf), 86 match, 0 conflict, 523 distractors, 88 index.
RA,Dec = (110.852,22.0025), pixel scale 5.96234 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-++---+--------++----------+-+++-+-----+-+---++--+-+--+-----+++-+----++----+----+---+-------++-
--> log-odds 353.493
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 786.53 (inf), 86 match, 0 conflict, 515 distractors, 88 index.
RA,Dec = (110.855,22.0102), pixel scale 5.96244 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--+++-++-+----+-++----------+-++--+--+-++-+--+-+--+-----------++-+-------+----++--------+-------
--> log-odds 786.53
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
--> log-odds 789.003
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1746.28 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 417 distractors, 187 index.
RA,Dec = (110.855,22.0102), pixel scale 5.96244 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-++++++-+-++-++++----+-++-++++++-++++-++-+-+++++++---+-----+-+++++--++--+-+-+++---+---+++----+-
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1748.88 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 425 distractors, 187 index.
RA,Dec = (110.852,22.0025), pixel scale 5.96234 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++++++--++---+-+-+++----+++--+++++-+++-+-++++++++--+-+-+++--+-+++-+----++-++-+-++-+-+++++--+--++-
--> log-odds 1746.28
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3275.46 (inf), 358 match, 0 conflict, 697 distractors, 371 index.
RA,Dec = (110.855,22.0102), pixel scale 5.96244 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++++++-+--+-+++++++++++++++-++++++-++++-++++--++-
--> log-odds 1748.88
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3329.94 (inf), 362 match, 0 conflict, 629 distractors, 371 index.
RA,Dec = (110.852,22.0025), pixel scale 5.96234 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-++++-++++++-++-+++++++-+++++-++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++--+++++-
--> log-odds 3275.46
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6001.18 (inf), 708 match, 1 conflict, 1738 distractors, 732 index.
RA,Dec = (110.855,22.0102), pixel scale 5.96244 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++
--> log-odds 3329.94
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6051.64 (inf), 712 match, 1 conflict, 1542 distractors, 733 index.
RA,Dec = (110.852,22.0025), pixel scale 5.96234 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6001.18
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10967.5 (inf), 1401 match, 0 conflict, 3230 distractors, 1448 index.
RA,Dec = (110.855,22.0102), pixel scale 5.96244 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6051.64
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11100 (inf), 1413 match, 0 conflict, 2842 distractors, 1447 index.
RA,Dec = (110.852,22.0025), pixel scale 5.96234 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10967.5
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.853490, 22.009524) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:24.838, +22:00:34.286).
Field size: 15.7112 x 10.528 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.23 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
--> log-odds 11100
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.850771, 22.001899) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:24.185, +22:00:06.835).
Field size: 15.711 x 10.5278 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.232 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.new"...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:24.626 +22:00:31.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
### Converted positions of 13721 stars ###
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:23.974 +22:00:03.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13823 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky602992.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky603109.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:23.974 +22:00:03.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:23.974 +22:00:03.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:24.626 +22:00:31.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:24.626 +22:00:31.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1149 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:23.974 +22:00:03.82
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:24.626 +22:00:31.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00803 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RRYzi9oDkl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xCXcK4d8TQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0LGd3PCyBC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U2gTqwPlNE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RRYzi9oDkl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=221 n_q2=248 n_q3=257 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xCXcK4d8TQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=167 n_q2=274 n_q3=215 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0LGd3PCyBC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=932, passed=13823
Got 13823 stars (including 12882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13823 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.877 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.776 n_q1=193 n_q2=277 n_q3=214 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U2gTqwPlNE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=950, passed=13721
Got 13721 stars (including 12754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13721 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.932 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.751 n_q1=205 n_q2=275 n_q3=208 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.415
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.40 +23:26:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits was not found.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:23.974 +22:00:03.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:24.626 +22:00:31.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 81212 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 82020 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky865642.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky865640.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
### Converted positions of 151496 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 153680 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky865822.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky865832.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:23.974 +22:00:03.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:23.974 +22:00:03.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:24.626 +22:00:31.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:24.626 +22:00:31.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1149 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:23.974 +22:00:03.82
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:24.626 +22:00:31.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00803 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xBXcKxxerW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pbaFMtM4CH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MTwwMp33x3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yhxfInPzS7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 85 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xBXcKxxerW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=234 n_q2=237 n_q3=245 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pbaFMtM4CH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=183 n_q2=265 n_q3=224 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MTwwMp33x3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=7268, passed=81205
Got 81205 stars (including 73852 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81205 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79445 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.799 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=221 n_q2=239 n_q3=247 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.360
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yhxfInPzS7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=7343, passed=82006
Got 82006 stars (including 74577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82006 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=223 n_q2=244 n_q3=244 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-27-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_232540_TTUQ2b1x1_580813_cqkHvu3X/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:51.43 +18:57:16.5: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:18.72 +18:08:22.5: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:21.29 +18:08:01.1: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:25.09 +24:56:42.3: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:44.94 +18:31:39.3: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:44.88 +21:03:14.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:44.94 +18:31:39.3: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:44.88 +21:03:14.6: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:44.94 +18:31:39.3: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5597 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:44.88 +21:03:14.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2626 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:25.09 +24:56:42.3: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:18.72 +18:08:22.5: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:21.29 +18:08:01.1: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:51.43 +18:57:16.5: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:25.09 +24:56:42.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1040 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:18.72 +18:08:22.5: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2882 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:21.29 +18:08:01.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1248 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:51.43 +18:57:16.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4243 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:29.46 +18:40:30.2: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:29.46 +18:40:30.2: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:29.46 +18:40:30.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7822 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:36.60 +23:32:16.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:16.27 +22:16:44.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:36.60 +23:32:16.6: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:53.78 +22:47:03.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:36.60 +23:32:16.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5421 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:16.27 +22:16:44.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:53.78 +22:47:03.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:33.81 +17:53:07.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:09.73 +18:31:46.5: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:09.73 +18:31:46.5: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:33.81 +17:53:07.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:09.73 +18:31:46.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7625 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:33.20 +20:12:14.8: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:41.85 +23:18:54.8: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:25.63 +21:29:26.2: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.20 +20:12:14.8: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.20 +20:12:14.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8573 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:18.16 +22:13:46.5: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.24 +19:51:31.7: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:41.85 +23:18:54.8: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:41.85 +23:18:54.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0441 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:25.63 +21:29:26.2: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:25.63 +21:29:26.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0705 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:18.16 +22:13:46.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.24 +19:51:31.7: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:18.16 +22:13:46.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2023 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.24 +19:51:31.7: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9683 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:42.03 +22:48:56.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:39.08 +20:41:04.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:42.03 +22:48:56.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:49.20 +20:17:56.7: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:42.24 +20:50:41.7: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:53.83 +23:39:40.6: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:39.08 +20:41:04.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:35.31 +19:16:57.0: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:49.20 +20:17:56.7: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:49.20 +20:17:56.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0599 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:42.24 +20:50:41.7: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:42.24 +20:50:41.7: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2183 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:53.83 +23:39:40.6: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:53.83 +23:39:40.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1671 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:35.31 +19:16:57.0: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:35.31 +19:16:57.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3005 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:50.09 +20:22:24.0: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:37.57 +22:05:28.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:55.57 +19:58:18.2: 15.37 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:44.13 +25:14:54.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:50.09 +20:22:24.0: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:50.09 +20:22:24.0: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4203 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:55.57 +19:58:18.2: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:37.57 +22:05:28.1: 15.98 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.98 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:55.57 +19:58:18.2: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7040 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:36:37.57 +22:05:28.1: ref_mag=15.98 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=14.3938 delta=1.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:44.13 +25:14:54.4: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:05.43 +25:13:21.0: 14.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:05.43 +25:13:21.0: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:05.43 +25:13:21.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8471 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195775.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195803.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195838.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196157.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196202.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196383.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195463_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195463_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195465_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195465_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195472_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195472_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195475_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195475_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195480_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195480_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:01.85 +19:06:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195513_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195513_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195519_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195519_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:58.73 +18:06:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195596_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195596_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.28 +24:07:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195619_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.14 +22:38:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195627_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195627_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:56.33 +24:55:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195643_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195643_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.38 +25:56:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195654_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195654_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195661_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195661_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.78 +23:56:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195668_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195668_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.47 +21:18:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195694_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195694_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.35 +24:32:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195707_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195707_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.69 +22:17:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.44 +21:31:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195726_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.88 +18:51:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195750_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195750_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.16 +18:14:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195751_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.35 +21:47:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:03.06 +18:51:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195775_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195781_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195781_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.75 +19:56:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195786_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195786_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.53 +20:30:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.45 +20:05:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195798_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195798_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.58 +20:26:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195812_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195812_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.62 +20:31:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195814_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195814_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.16 +24:08:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.92 +22:47:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195826_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195826_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.67 +19:09:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:27.62 +22:47:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195837_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195837_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.23 +22:57:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195841_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195841_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195845_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.92 +18:10:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195846_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195846_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.07 +20:06:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.47 +25:10:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:51.59 +24:24:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195858_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195858_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.82 +24:19:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195880_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195880_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:26.54 +21:32:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195887_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195887_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.85 +24:17:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195900_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195900_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.83 +22:53:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195901_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195901_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.14 +25:27:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.58 +22:40:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195919_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195919_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.44 +18:53:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195923_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195923_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.63 +20:00:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195944_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195944_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:40.92 +22:08:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195959_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195959_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:12.08 +21:26:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.17 +21:35:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195976_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195976_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.77 +21:21:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195994_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195994_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196009_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196009_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.10 +25:23:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196011_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196011_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:37.95 +20:47:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196027_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196027_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:03.22 +17:51:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196046_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196046_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196068_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196068_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196084_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196084_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196106_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196106_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.83 +17:52:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196129_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196129_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.80 +20:49:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196147_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196147_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:22.97 +19:59:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196157_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 196157_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196163_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196163_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.51 +20:49:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:31.24 +19:26:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196169_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196169_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.67 +25:44:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196202_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 196202_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196246_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196246_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:38.54 +26:01:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196249_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196249_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196264_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196264_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196288_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196288_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196341_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196341_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196342_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 196342_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196378_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196378_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196383_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 196383_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196390_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196390_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84495_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 84495_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.38 +23:26:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40494_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 40494_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_22-28-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
