This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,7.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 7.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,7.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 7.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,7.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 7.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1592 2461173.6592 11.96 07:51:19.76 +23:40:06.9
197.19108 23.18177 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.40 Harmonia -0 0 1 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:51:19.76 +23:40:06.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:51:19.76 +23:40:06.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,7.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 7.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,7.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 7.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.9286+22.1603,2461173.6592,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.9286+22.1603 20260513.1592 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1592 2461173.6592 13.18 07:03:08.22 +26:55:25.3
189.69941 14.29771 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 3 -0 3 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:03:08.22 +26:55:25.3: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:08.22 +26:55:25.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1592 2461173.6592 13.36 07:19:17.56 +22:16:42.8
195.62295 15.82592 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 2 0 2 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:17.56 +22:16:42.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:17.56 +22:16:42.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1592 2461173.6592 13.70 07:38:55.10 +22:46:59.2
196.96432 20.20368 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 0 0 0 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:55.10 +22:46:59.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:55.10 +22:46:59.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1592 2461173.6592 13.67 07:34:35.34 +17:53:04.4
201.32054 17.37135 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 2 1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:35.34 +17:53:04.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:35.34 +17:53:04.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1592 2461173.6592 14.04 07:36:43.05 +22:48:52.6
196.73165 19.74494 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 0 0 0 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:43.05 +22:48:52.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:43.05 +22:48:52.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1592 2461173.6592 14.32 07:41:40.40 +20:41:00.5
199.29211 20.00509 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 1 -0 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:40.40 +20:41:00.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:40.40 +20:41:00.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 13.1592 2461173.6592 14.43 07:40:45.51 +25:14:47.8
194.67323 21.49268 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.143 Adria 2 0 2 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:45.51 +25:14:47.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:45.51 +25:14:47.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461173.6592,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260513.1592 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461173.65943764 13.05.2026 03:49:25.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21180
Objects passed selection criteria: 21133
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18466.8
Average stars matched: 17593 (95.2685 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 22:55:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461173.65943764 13.05.2026 03:49:25.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 173
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 59 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 138710
Objects passed selection criteria: 138391
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 120727
Average stars matched: 115652 (95.7963 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2164000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 22:59:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461173.65901696
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Choosing aperture...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
The guess is 573 arcmin.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 13361 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 13277 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2658489.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2658488.xyls"...
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 22550 stars ###
### Converted positions of 23656 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2658913.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2658881.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2658489.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 32.9169 (1.97529e+14), 7 match, 0 conflict, 24 distractors, 42 index.
RA,Dec = (110.828,22.035), pixel scale 5.95578 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----+-----+-----+--+--+-----+(best)--------------------+------+-----------------------------------------
Reading file "./out2658488.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2658489.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field: out2658489.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.804815, 22.027945) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:13.156, +22:01:40.601).
Field size: 15.8036 x 10.5752 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.562 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits'
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 32.8539 (1.85475e+14), 7 match, 0 conflict, 24 distractors, 42 index.
RA,Dec = (110.833,22.0329), pixel scale 5.95575 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----+-----+-----+--+--+-----+(best)--------------------+------+-----------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2658488.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2658488.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.809745, 22.025892) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:14.339, +22:01:33.211).
Field size: 15.8038 x 10.5753 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.562 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 22:55 fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 22:55 out2658489.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 22:55 fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 22:55 out2658488.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2658489.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2658488.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2658489.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.735 degrees of RA,Dec (110.804,22.0272)
log-odds ratio 133.344 (8.14216e+57), 15 match, 0 conflict, 22 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (110.803,22.0279), pixel scale 5.97492 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-++++++----+-+---+++----------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2658488.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.735 degrees of RA,Dec (110.809,22.0251)
log-odds ratio 133.306 (7.83454e+57), 15 match, 0 conflict, 22 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (110.807,22.0258), pixel scale 5.97493 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-+-++-++++---+-+---+++----------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2658489.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2658489.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.805739, 22.027331) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:13.377, +22:01:38.393).
Field size: 15.782 x 10.5772 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.567 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2658488.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2658488.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.810678, 22.025290) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:14.563, +22:01:31.043).
Field size: 15.7823 x 10.5774 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.566 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 22:55 fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 22:55 out2658489.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 22:55 fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 22:55 out2658488.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 65668 sources.
simplexy: found 66318 sources.
Solving...
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7541, 955.712] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7545, 955.718] arcmin
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 70.8988 (6.17977e+30), 23 match, 0 conflict, 510 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (110.807,22.0281), pixel scale 5.98817 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+-----+---+----------+------+---------+------------------------------+-------------------------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 52.3464 (5.41695e+22), 23 match, 0 conflict, 510 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (110.812,22.0261), pixel scale 5.98821 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------+------------+------------++---------------------------------------------------+--------+-
--> log-odds 70.8988
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 297.014 (9.80539e+128), 42 match, 0 conflict, 591 distractors, 42 index.
RA,Dec = (110.807,22.0281), pixel scale 5.98817 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----++----+--++----------+------+---------+-----+---+--------------------+--+-----------+----------
--> log-odds 52.3464
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 291.888 (5.82588e+126), 42 match, 0 conflict, 552 distractors, 42 index.
RA,Dec = (110.812,22.0261), pixel scale 5.98821 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------+----------+-+-----+------++------------+---+--+-+---------+-------------------+--------+-
--> log-odds 297.014
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 291.888
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
log-odds ratio 766.811 (inf), 85 match, 0 conflict, 548 distractors, 86 index.
RA,Dec = (110.807,22.0281), pixel scale 5.98817 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+-----+--++--+-++----+-+----+-+-------+-----+---+---+--------+--+--+-+--+-------+---+--+---+---
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 749.628 (inf), 84 match, 0 conflict, 541 distractors, 86 index.
RA,Dec = (110.812,22.0261), pixel scale 5.98821 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+------+---+---+----+-++--+------++---+--+----++---+--+-+--+-+-+--+-------+-----------+-------++-
--> log-odds 749.628
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
--> log-odds 766.811
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1756.31 (inf), 183 match, 0 conflict, 466 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (110.812,22.0261), pixel scale 5.98821 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+--++--+++++-++++++++++++-++--+-+++-+-++-++--+++-+-++-+++--+-+-++-+----+++++++-+------+++-+--++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1747.06 (inf), 182 match, 0 conflict, 451 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (110.807,22.0281), pixel scale 5.98817 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-++++++-+--+++++++++-++++++-+-+++-+-++--+++---++-++---++----++-++-++++++-++---+-+-+--++-++---+---
--> log-odds 1747.06
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1756.31
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
log-odds ratio 3310.73 (inf), 354 match, 0 conflict, 571 distractors, 371 index.
RA,Dec = (110.807,22.0281), pixel scale 5.98817 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++++---++-++-+++++++++++++++-+-+++-+++-+++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3307.53 (inf), 354 match, 0 conflict, 412 distractors, 373 index.
RA,Dec = (110.812,22.0261), pixel scale 5.98821 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+++-++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++--++++++--++++++-+++++++++++++++---+++++-++-++++
--> log-odds 3310.73
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
--> log-odds 3307.53
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6057.19 (inf), 695 match, 1 conflict, 835 distractors, 741 index.
RA,Dec = (110.807,22.0281), pixel scale 5.98817 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6030.15 (inf), 693 match, 1 conflict, 870 distractors, 743 index.
RA,Dec = (110.812,22.0261), pixel scale 5.98821 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6057.19
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11115.2 (inf), 1381 match, 0 conflict, 1799 distractors, 1461 index.
RA,Dec = (110.807,22.0281), pixel scale 5.98817 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6030.15
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11019.6 (inf), 1372 match, 0 conflict, 1865 distractors, 1463 index.
RA,Dec = (110.812,22.0261), pixel scale 5.98821 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11115.2
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.805460, 22.027657) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:13.310, +22:01:39.566).
Field size: 15.7815 x 10.5745 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.563 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.new"...
--> log-odds 11019.6
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.810376, 22.025603) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:14.490, +22:01:32.170).
Field size: 15.7818 x 10.5746 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.562 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:14.262 +22:01:29.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.082 +22:01:36.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13983 stars ###
### Converted positions of 14142 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2664608.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2664609.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.082 +22:01:36.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.082 +22:01:36.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0767 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:14.262 +22:01:29.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:14.262 +22:01:29.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0800 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:13.082 +22:01:36.76
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:14.262 +22:01:29.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00500 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eTETVh5Sn5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PLsfxlVdUV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I0XB29NAra
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pdMAGHYFkC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.904800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.904800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eTETVh5Sn5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=221 n_q2=247 n_q3=258 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PLsfxlVdUV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=167 n_q2=275 n_q3=215 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I0XB29NAra (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=795, passed=14142
Got 14142 stars (including 13336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14142 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=194 n_q2=250 n_q3=244 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pdMAGHYFkC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=794, passed=13983
Got 13983 stars (including 13174 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13983 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=191 n_q2=252 n_q3=249 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:03:35.99 +19:55:35.0: 11.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:51:19.76 +23:40:06.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:51:19.76 +23:40:06.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:35.99 +19:55:35.0: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:35.99 +19:55:35.0: ref_mag=11.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8825 delta=-0.82 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33410.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 33132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 33133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 33134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33241_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33241_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:33.24 +26:08:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33410_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 33410_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.50 +23:26:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:51:19.76 +23:40:06.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits was not found.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.082 +22:01:36.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:14.262 +22:01:29.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 89821 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3169249.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
### Converted positions of 91078 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3169259.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
### Converted positions of 151496 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3169431.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
### Converted positions of 153680 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3169441.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.082 +22:01:36.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.082 +22:01:36.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0767 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:14.262 +22:01:29.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:14.262 +22:01:29.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0800 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:13.082 +22:01:36.76
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:14.262 +22:01:29.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00500 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7l8bP1SwVK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LQPhK7X76r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m2N6aebpMR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nxk5d8qdbm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 163 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7l8bP1SwVK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=17863, passed=153629
Got 153629 stars (including 135492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=232 n_q2=238 n_q3=246 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LQPhK7X76r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=182 n_q2=266 n_q3=224 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m2N6aebpMR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=5479, passed=89802
Got 89802 stars (including 84167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89802 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=209 n_q2=249 n_q3=250 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nxk5d8qdbm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=5365, passed=91069
Got 91069 stars (including 85543 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 91069 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=203 n_q2=256 n_q3=249 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_225213_TTUQ1b1x1_2648009_tTOwb3WK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:46:21.90 +17:01:04.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:53.93 +23:39:40.5: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:44:15.50 +20:58:30.7: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:08.89 +22:08:35.4: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:21.49 +23:49:15.4: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:53.93 +23:39:40.5: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:46:21.90 +17:01:04.2: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:21.49 +23:49:15.4: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:08.89 +22:08:35.4: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:44:15.50 +20:58:30.7: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:53.93 +23:39:40.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2847 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:08.89 +22:08:35.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1410 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:21.49 +23:49:15.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3830 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:46:21.90 +17:01:04.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4984 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:15.50 +20:58:30.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7173 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:40.20 +23:05:35.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:40.20 +23:05:35.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:40.20 +23:05:35.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3326 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:03:08.22 +26:55:25.3: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:08.22 +26:55:25.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:17.56 +22:16:42.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:17.56 +22:16:42.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:50:42.97 +23:41:40.9: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:50:42.97 +23:41:40.9: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:42.97 +23:41:40.9: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3019 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:36.58 +23:32:16.4: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:53:09.99 +23:16:42.9: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:36.58 +23:32:16.4: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:36.58 +23:32:16.4: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6291 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:53:09.99 +23:16:42.9: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:09.99 +23:16:42.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8029 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:55.10 +22:46:59.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:55.10 +22:46:59.2: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:35.34 +17:53:04.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:06:46.22 +20:31:54.8: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:35.34 +17:53:04.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:46.22 +20:31:54.8: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:46.22 +20:31:54.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6155 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:26.54 +21:32:35.6: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.38 +19:51:30.0: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:26.54 +21:32:35.6: 13.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:37.92 +19:20:30.6: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:26.54 +21:32:35.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8372 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.38 +19:51:30.0: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.38 +19:51:30.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8045 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:53:42.14 +20:44:44.6: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:27.65 +22:47:25.5: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:37.92 +19:20:30.6: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:37.92 +19:20:30.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7063 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:42.14 +20:44:44.6: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:42.14 +20:44:44.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5455 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:27.65 +22:47:25.5: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:27.65 +22:47:25.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8060 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:57:59.00 +21:29:43.7: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:59.00 +21:29:43.7: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:59.00 +21:29:43.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7054 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:29.69 +18:58:51.9: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:20:29.10 +26:43:12.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:56:08.38 +23:29:47.6: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:29.69 +18:58:51.9: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:29.69 +18:58:51.9: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9793 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:29.10 +26:43:12.0: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:33.21 +20:12:14.3: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:29.10 +26:43:12.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8377 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:56:08.38 +23:29:47.6: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:56:08.38 +23:29:47.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8859 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.21 +20:12:14.3: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.21 +20:12:14.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8551 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:59.01 +22:30:35.0: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:12.11 +26:11:50.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:23.87 +19:52:23.0: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:59.01 +22:30:35.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:59.01 +22:30:35.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8289 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:05.27 +24:19:22.3: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:12.11 +26:11:50.9: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:12.11 +26:11:50.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8564 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:23.87 +19:52:23.0: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:23.87 +19:52:23.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9300 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:05.27 +24:19:22.3: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:05.27 +24:19:22.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1401 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:43.05 +22:48:52.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:09.80 +26:38:10.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:18.91 +26:28:37.3: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:25.52 +24:07:36.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:43.05 +22:48:52.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:09.80 +26:38:10.5: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:09.80 +26:38:10.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1480 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:18.91 +26:28:37.3: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:18.91 +26:28:37.3: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2497 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:25.52 +24:07:36.7: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:25.52 +24:07:36.7: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1355 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:40.40 +20:41:00.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:45.51 +25:14:47.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:28.20 +23:53:16.9: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:40.40 +20:41:00.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:50:39.12 +17:13:29.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:45.51 +25:14:47.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:28.20 +23:53:16.9: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:28.20 +23:53:16.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6367 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:50:39.12 +17:13:29.8: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:39.12 +17:13:29.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182059.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182118.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182399.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182438.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183054.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:52.68 +24:48:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181124_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181124_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:18.48 +25:39:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181126_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181126_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:40.79 +22:36:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181136_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181136_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:42.50 +25:23:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181139_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181139_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:42.93 +23:17:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181143_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181143_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181146_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181146_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:25.81 +22:06:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181148_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181148_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:14.70 +23:49:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181149_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181149_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:12.03 +22:07:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:00.07 +19:41:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:56.81 +22:06:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181155_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 181155_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 181156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 181159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181429_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181429_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:54.76 +24:09:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:19.75 +23:40:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.24 +24:07:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.67 +19:12:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.48 +22:23:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181549_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181549_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181634_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181634_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.39 +25:56:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181638_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181638_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.95 +19:13:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181695_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181695_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:29.42 +18:40:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181723_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 181723_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181759_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181759_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.50 +21:18:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.79 +23:56:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181777_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181777_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.90 +20:58:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181778_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181778_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.39 +26:03:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181785_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181785_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:52.54 +27:05:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181810_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181810_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.29 +23:37:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181841_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181841_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.34 +24:32:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181842_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181842_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:28.37 +18:20:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.67 +22:17:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181908_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181908_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:10.92 +23:57:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181910_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181910_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.39 +25:34:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181916_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181916_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:02.25 +26:11:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181930_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181930_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.37 +21:47:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.82 +18:51:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182006_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182006_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.44 +21:31:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182027_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182027_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.86 +23:26:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182031_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182031_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:17.82 +26:51:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182043_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182043_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.46 +24:54:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182047_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182047_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.14 +18:14:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182056_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182056_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.47 +20:30:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182059_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182059_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182060_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182060_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:11.33 +25:40:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182077_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182077_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:21.41 +26:41:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182092_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182092_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:49.99 +17:03:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182095_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182095_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:12.89 +20:54:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182100_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182100_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:49.17 +22:03:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.73 +24:40:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182151_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182151_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.34 +22:04:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.42 +20:05:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182177_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182177_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.61 +26:19:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182203_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182203_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:25.16 +24:28:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182243_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182243_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:00.31 +20:48:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182262_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182262_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182267_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182267_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:43.67 +26:07:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182269_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182269_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.68 +20:31:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182297_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182297_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:00.25 +17:19:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182298_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182298_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.09 +25:18:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:59.77 +25:32:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182341_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182341_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182349_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182349_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:14.75 +23:44:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182367_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182367_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.46 +25:10:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182387_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182387_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.04 +20:06:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182399_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182399_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182404_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182404_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.03 +24:28:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182405_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182405_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.81 +24:19:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182409_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182409_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:08.49 +26:12:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182425_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182425_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:53.78 +18:55:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.26 +22:57:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182438_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182438_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.66 +19:56:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:19.07 +18:19:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:22.64 +24:42:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.25 +23:05:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182527_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182527_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.08 +25:27:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:35.49 +22:37:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.56 +20:00:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.56 +22:40:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:39.60 +26:00:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182588_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182588_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.13 +19:14:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.69 +20:16:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182607_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182607_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.61 +25:50:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182639_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182639_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.01 +25:23:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182644_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182644_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.39 +18:07:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182647_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182647_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182652_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182652_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182656_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182656_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.49 +20:35:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182665_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182665_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.62 +19:09:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182667_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182667_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182668_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182668_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182674_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182674_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:39.17 +25:35:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182693_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182693_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182696_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182696_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182701_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182701_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.58 +21:44:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182716_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182716_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.75 +21:27:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182738_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182738_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:50.87 +26:08:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182753_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182753_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:26.10 +25:37:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182755_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182755_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.72 +21:21:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182773_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182773_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.31 +18:53:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182780_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182780_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.82 +20:49:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182787_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182787_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182789_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182789_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:33.09 +19:14:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182805_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182805_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:41.52 +19:34:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182813_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182813_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.49 +19:03:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182816_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182816_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:54.13 +23:53:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182818_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182818_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182819_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182819_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:08.66 +20:50:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182829_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182829_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:10.22 +23:40:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182831_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182831_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182832_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182832_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.96 +22:53:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182869_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182869_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182888_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182888_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182904_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182904_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:58.40 +26:47:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:51.77 +25:02:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182937_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182937_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182972_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182972_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.87 +17:52:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182974_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182974_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:58.71 +23:24:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182982_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182982_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:52.27 +26:24:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.04 +21:35:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183003_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183003_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.75 +23:02:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183006_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183006_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:44.20 +24:12:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183013_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183013_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.63 +17:29:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.68 +25:49:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183028_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183028_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.96 +21:26:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183054_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 183054_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:38.55 +26:01:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183070_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183070_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183109_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183109_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:46.78 +26:33:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.64 +25:44:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:43.82 +22:50:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183162_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183162_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:30.97 +25:14:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183194_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183194_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:24.28 +24:47:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183197_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183197_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:01.30 +20:29:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183212_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 183212_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183273_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183273_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:59.89 +20:18:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183303_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 183303_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166070_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 166070_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.49 +23:26:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.42 +26:47:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168691_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 168691_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_22-49-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
