NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 03 20.24630    2461119.74630    12.12    14:26:10.04 +63:50:44.8   7616 4644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 04 17.37901    2461147.87901    11.19    14:26:10.28 +63:50:46.1   1894 1863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    10.18    14:26:10.28 +63:50:45.5   2028 1647   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    10.16    14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.6   2028 1652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.3484  2461172.8484  10.17  14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5
106.86610  50.22398 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.1 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 2"  NSVS J1426111+635046          
Type: M
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    13.091   g       Y     2.221   g         2458248.34330        212.050148700000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5:  12.16 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5:  11.21 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.39 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 444325 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 444325 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits

renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 483.0947 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 505.4854 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 948.5857 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 499.3332 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 948.4681 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 498.9580 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.96356 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-12T03:21:08.6958257' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-12T08:21:08.6958257' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61172.3480173033 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-12T08:21:18.5961538' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61172.3481318983 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 205.712848185231 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999110674178 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.9658333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 327.975277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.32468741560099 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29373 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29373 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 4.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 55.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits :) Spent 0.640262 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-12T03:21:54.5971012' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-12T08:21:54.5971012' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61172.3485485762 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-12T08:22:04.5021716' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61172.3486632174 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 205.712848223955 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999110219947 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.8811111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 327.926666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.32639049712801 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29373 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29373 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 4.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 55.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits :) Spent 0.756719 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits


fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.84813304 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits .... Determining astrometry method... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits was not set. Trying to guess... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5630 high-SNR stars for plate solving '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 570 arcmin. /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometThe guess is 570 arcmin. This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ric_calibration found 5590 high-SNR stars for plate solving WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits was not found. ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits was not found. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3268131.xyls"... This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ Generating wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat from image00001.cat ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3268132.xyls"... Generating wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat from image00002.cat Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:52.147 +62:00:14.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 7551 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3268543.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 7062 stars ### The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3268575.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3268131.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading file "./out3268132.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 26.4135 (2.95975e+11), 12 match, 0 conflict, 56 distractors, 48 index. RA,Dec = (205.795,61.9938), pixel scale 5.96047 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+----+----+------------------++----+----+-+---+-----------------++(best)-------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3268131.solved to indicate this. Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 30.5747 (1.89865e+13), 13 match, 0 conflict, 55 distractors, 48 index. RA,Dec = (205.797,62.0021), pixel scale 5.96058 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+----+----+------------------++----++---+-----+-+---------------++(best)-------------------------------- Field: out3268131.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.770781, 61.986640) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:43:04.987, +61:59:11.906). Field size: 15.7829 x 10.5681 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.24 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits' -> 'fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits' Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3268132.solved to indicate this. Field: out3268132.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.772545, 61.995005) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:43:05.411, +61:59:42.019). Field size: 15.783 x 10.5679 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.239 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits' -> 'fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits' WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 03:33 fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 03:33 out3268131.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits)... done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 03:33 fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 03:33 out3268132.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits)... done! done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits (fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits (fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3268131.xyls"... Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3268132.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3268131.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7183 degrees of RA,Dec (205.769,61.9859) log-odds ratio 86.227 (2.80478e+37), 15 match, 0 conflict, 21 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (205.766,61.9822), pixel scale 5.97589 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-+++--++--------+------+-+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------- Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3268132.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7183 degrees of RA,Dec (205.771,61.9942) log-odds ratio 85.7517 (1.74379e+37), 15 match, 0 conflict, 23 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (205.768,61.9904), pixel scale 5.97594 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-+++--+--+----+----------+-+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3268131.solved to indicate this. Field: out3268131.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.771698, 61.984943) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:43:05.207, +61:59:05.796). Field size: 15.7659 x 10.5743 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.242 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 03:33 fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 03:33 out3268131.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits)... done! done! Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3268132.solved to indicate this. Field: out3268132.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.773471, 61.993262) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:43:05.633, +61:59:35.744). Field size: 15.7661 x 10.5743 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.243 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 03:33 fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 03:33 out3268132.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 21086 sources. simplexy: found 21094 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.704, 954.961] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 32.7644 (1.69593e+14), 7 match, 0 conflict, 117 distractors, 7 index. RA,Dec = (205.775,61.994), pixel scale 5.98346 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-------+-------+--------------------------------------------------------+---------------------- fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10) --> log-odds 32.7644 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 186.982 (1.60453e+81), 21 match, 0 conflict, 160 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (205.775,61.994), pixel scale 5.98346 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-------+----+--+------+---------+-----+---------------------+----+------+-----+--------------++ --> log-odds 186.982 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 481.072 (8.45441e+208), 48 match, 0 conflict, 133 distractors, 48 index. RA,Dec = (205.775,61.994), pixel scale 5.98346 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+++-+---++-+-+--+-+---++++-----+-+-----+----++------+--------++---+-----+++----++--------++--+++ --> log-odds 481.072 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 924.208 (inf), 92 match, 0 conflict, 117 distractors, 92 index. RA,Dec = (205.775,61.994), pixel scale 5.98346 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+++-+-++++-+-+--+-+---++++---+++-+--+-+++++-++++---+++-+-++-++++--+--++++++-+++++---+--+-++-++++ Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7036, 954.955] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 9.25915 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 180.157 (1.74254e+78), 21 match, 0 conflict, 160 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (205.774,61.9857), pixel scale 5.98343 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------+--------------+---------+-+--+--+-------+-------+--+----+---------+-----+---+---+-----+-- --> log-odds 924.208 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1903.04 (inf), 200 match, 0 conflict, 170 distractors, 200 index. RA,Dec = (205.775,61.994), pixel scale 5.98346 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--+-+++++++ --> log-odds 180.157 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 482.391 (3.16091e+209), 48 match, 0 conflict, 133 distractors, 48 index. RA,Dec = (205.774,61.9857), pixel scale 5.98343 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++--+----+--+------+--+++----+-+--++-+-------+-------+--+-+--+----++--++---+++-+++---+-+---++- --> log-odds 1903.04 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3431.46 (inf), 384 match, 0 conflict, 238 distractors, 386 index. RA,Dec = (205.775,61.994), pixel scale 5.98346 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++ --> log-odds 482.391 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 927.267 (inf), 92 match, 0 conflict, 95 distractors, 92 index. RA,Dec = (205.774,61.9857), pixel scale 5.98343 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++++++-+++--+-+++-----+-++++-++++-++-++++++---+-+----++-+--++++-+-++-++++++--++++-+++-+-+-+--++++ --> log-odds 3431.46 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6140.1 (inf), 743 match, 0 conflict, 1127 distractors, 746 index. RA,Dec = (205.775,61.994), pixel scale 5.98346 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 927.267 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1907.28 (inf), 201 match, 0 conflict, 147 distractors, 201 index. RA,Dec = (205.774,61.9857), pixel scale 5.98343 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++++ --> log-odds 6140.1 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 11085.2 (inf), 1466 match, 1 conflict, 2930 distractors, 1477 index. RA,Dec = (205.775,61.994), pixel scale 5.98346 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 1907.28 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3436.42 (inf), 385 match, 0 conflict, 285 distractors, 387 index. RA,Dec = (205.774,61.9857), pixel scale 5.98343 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++ --> log-odds 3436.42 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 6127.21 (inf), 741 match, 0 conflict, 1257 distractors, 744 index. RA,Dec = (205.774,61.9857), pixel scale 5.98343 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 11085.2 Got 8 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.772940, 61.994363) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:43:05.506, +61:59:39.706). Field size: 15.767 x 10.5689 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.239 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.new"... --> log-odds 6127.21 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 11069.9 (inf), 1464 match, 1 conflict, 3204 distractors, 1475 index. RA,Dec = (205.774,61.9857), pixel scale 5.98343 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ renamed 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat from image00004.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:43:05.054 +61:59:36.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### --> log-odds 11069.9 Got 7 solutions. ### Converted positions of 7010 stars ### Field: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (205.771192, 61.986024) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:43:05.086, +61:59:09.685). Field size: 15.7669 x 10.569 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.24 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.new"... 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3273280.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits renamed 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:43:04.635 +61:59:06.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6991 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3273402.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:43:04.635 +61:59:06.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 Second-epoch image center 13:43:04.635 +61:59:06.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0309 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:43:05.054 +61:59:36.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 Second-epoch image center 13:43:05.054 +61:59:36.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0244 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:43:04.635 +61:59:06.90 Second-epoch second image center 13:43:05.054 +61:59:36.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00838 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LdrulLVloZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.94MxSMWdsc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pBhxnvARoe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7uboGGMpHt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6104 to 225.4415 deg, Dec +55.7896 to +67.2870 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6104 to 225.4415 deg, Dec 55.7896 to 67.2870 deg Loaded 6234 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3963 out of 4107 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 7551 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6104 to 225.4415 deg, Dec +55.7896 to +67.2870 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6104 to 225.4415 deg, Dec 55.7896 to 67.2870 deg Loaded 6234 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3963 out of 4107 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 7551 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 7062 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6575 to 224.9383 deg, Dec +55.9545 to +67.2617 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6575 to 224.9383 deg, Dec 55.9545 to 67.2617 deg Loaded 6026 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4057 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4057 out of 7062 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits (aperture=6.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 2.5 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 5.2 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits 5.2 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits 2.4 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 2.5 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 15.2 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.LdrulLVloZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=445, passed=7551 Got 7551 stars (including 7102 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7551 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=219 n_q2=256 n_q3=215 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.94MxSMWdsc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=449, passed=7062 Got 7062 stars (including 6606 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7062 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.628 n_q1=279 n_q2=217 n_q3=232 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.560 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.pBhxnvARoe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=257, passed=6991 Got 6991 stars (including 6731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6991 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=259 n_q2=217 n_q3=258 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.7uboGGMpHt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, passed=7010 Got 7010 stars (including 6742 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7010 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6934 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6934 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=260 n_q2=216 n_q3=257 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:39:29.63 +64:40:21.1: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:03:52.44 +61:21:02.4: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:47:30.07 +60:40:45.2: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:35:22.44 +56:01:42.1: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:45:35.67 +60:42:45.8: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:25:56.49 +62:22:52.1: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:35:22.44 +56:01:42.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:22.44 +56:01:42.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:03:52.44 +61:21:02.4: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:39:29.63 +64:40:21.1: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:52.44 +61:21:02.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5563 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:45:35.67 +60:42:45.8: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:29.63 +64:40:21.1: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9734 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:35.67 +60:42:45.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5315 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:47:30.07 +60:40:45.2: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:25:56.49 +62:22:52.1: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:47:30.07 +60:40:45.2: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1518 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:25:56.49 +62:22:52.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6215 delta=1.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.1678 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20474.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05356.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20398_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20398_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    11.94    14:26:57.90 +58:09:02.7   1170 4997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits **** FOUND 14:26:57.96 +58:09:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20474_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20474_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    11.62    13:25:56.48 +62:22:52.3   6000 3001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits **** FOUND 13:25:56.49 +62:22:52.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.733 1663975613003745536 201.48494019272 +62.38110990771 10.8359 9.3981 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.733#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20495_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20495_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.03    12:39:29.63 +64:40:20.4   9007 1328   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    11.93    12:39:29.63 +64:40:21.7   9007 1333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20499_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20499_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.08    13:01:53.89 +65:54:05.8   7486 0798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits **** FOUND 13:01:53.88 +65:54:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20502_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20502_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.13    13:47:30.08 +60:40:45.2   4412 3955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.17    13:47:30.07 +60:40:45.2   4412 3961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20522_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20522_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.35    14:35:22.48 +56:01:42.2   0161 6086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.36    14:35:22.40 +56:01:41.9   0161 6091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20536_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20536_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.51    13:45:35.65 +60:42:45.8   4554 3946   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.55    13:45:35.69 +60:42:45.8   4554 3951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20541_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20541_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.54    14:03:52.42 +61:21:02.6   3271 3418   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.58    14:03:52.45 +61:21:02.2   3271 3423   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20185_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 20185_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    11.59    14:26:04.91 +58:05:12.6   1230 5051   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits **** FOUND 14:26:04.90 +58:05:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05356_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 Preparing report for the candidate 05356_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits was not set. Trying to guess... Entering WCS image calibration mode. The guess is 605 arcmin. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits was not found. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 570 arcmin. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits was not found. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits was not found. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits was not set. Trying to guess... verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits The guess is 570 arcmin. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Generating wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat from image00001.cat Generating wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat from image00003.cat Generating wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat from image00004.cat Generating wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat from image00002.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:43:05.054 +61:59:36.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:43:04.635 +61:59:06.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:52.147 +62:00:14.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 25188 stars ### ### Converted positions of 25137 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3300500.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3300494.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits ### Converted positions of 36890 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3300572.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits ### Converted positions of 32649 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3300617.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:43:04.635 +61:59:06.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 Second-epoch image center 13:43:04.635 +61:59:06.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0309 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:43:05.054 +61:59:36.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:57.023 +62:00:44.26 Second-epoch image center 13:43:05.054 +61:59:36.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0244 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:43:04.635 +61:59:06.90 Second-epoch second image center 13:43:05.054 +61:59:36.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00838 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lR1TniHfmB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DaMWrV4BL1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DoKh8K02KL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.69cst0dWK2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 36890 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.4651 to 225.4414 deg, Dec +55.7896 to +67.2893 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.4651 to 225.4414 deg, Dec 55.7896 to 67.2893 deg Loaded 6263 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3770 out of 4119 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4119 out of 36890 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.807000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.807000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 36890 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.4651 to 225.4414 deg, Dec +55.7896 to +67.2893 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.4651 to 225.4414 deg, Dec 55.7896 to 67.2893 deg Loaded 6263 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3770 out of 4119 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4119 out of 36890 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits (aperture=5.2) Read 32649 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.2770 to 225.0772 deg, Dec +55.9198 to +67.2675 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.2770 to 225.0772 deg, Dec 55.9198 to 67.2675 deg Loaded 6126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 4057 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4057 out of 32649 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits (aperture=5.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 2.3 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 4.6 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits 4.6 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits 2.3 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 2.3 pix wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lR1TniHfmB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1687, passed=36874 Got 36874 stars (including 35147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36874 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36371 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36370 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36370 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=220 n_q2=251 n_q3=215 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.DaMWrV4BL1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2144, passed=32635 Got 32635 stars (including 30451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32635 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32017 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32016 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32016 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.628 n_q1=291 n_q2=212 n_q3=237 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.489 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.DoKh8K02KL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=49, blended=1350, passed=25088 Got 25088 stars (including 23722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25088 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24867 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=261 n_q2=219 n_q3=257 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.69cst0dWK2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=1369, passed=25147 Got 25147 stars (including 23759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25147 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24940 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=265 n_q2=215 n_q3=254 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:32:15.96 +59:45:48.2: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:45:13.54 +66:43:50.4: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:13:22.08 +58:24:11.8: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:33:41.33 +64:41:53.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:43:42.29 +59:14:55.5: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:39:13.18 +58:18:04.8: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:50:51.24 +66:36:17.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:50:46.66 +58:15:12.4: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:26:45.81 +62:51:19.9: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:45:13.54 +66:43:50.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:45:13.54 +66:43:50.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:44:08.51 +66:31:36.7: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:44:08.51 +66:31:36.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:44:08.51 +66:31:36.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:32:15.96 +59:45:48.2: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:50:51.24 +66:36:17.9: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:43:42.29 +59:14:55.5: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:33:41.33 +64:41:53.7: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:39:13.18 +58:18:04.8: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:13:22.08 +58:24:11.8: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:50:46.66 +58:15:12.4: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:32:15.96 +59:45:48.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2165 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:26:45.81 +62:51:19.9: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:50:51.24 +66:36:17.9: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9032 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:33:41.33 +64:41:53.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7469 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:43:42.29 +59:14:55.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0907 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:13.18 +58:18:04.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0962 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:50:46.66 +58:15:12.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1988 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:22.08 +58:24:11.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0377 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:45.81 +62:51:19.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0841 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:48:46.76 +66:49:13.7: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:48:46.76 +66:49:13.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:48:46.76 +66:49:13.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:23:54.73 +56:18:00.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:23:54.73 +56:18:00.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:54.73 +56:18:00.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 13:01:47.26 +61:21:29.7: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:30:06.08 +56:05:59.7: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:13:56.99 +56:23:56.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:24:41.80 +56:14:35.1: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:35:00.93 +56:05:05.0: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:30:09.39 +56:14:49.0: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:30:06.08 +56:05:59.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:06.08 +56:05:59.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:13:56.99 +56:23:56.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:56.99 +56:23:56.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:34:09.31 +56:05:54.4: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:24:41.80 +56:14:35.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:41.80 +56:14:35.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:30:09.39 +56:14:49.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:09.39 +56:14:49.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:35:00.93 +56:05:05.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:00.93 +56:05:05.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:34:09.31 +56:05:54.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:09.31 +56:05:54.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 13:01:47.26 +61:21:29.7: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:01:47.26 +61:21:29.7: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6080 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:12:59.04 +57:16:46.9: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:12:59.04 +57:16:46.9: 15.77 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:32:42.56 +65:05:11.7: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:39:56.43 +65:37:56.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:59.04 +57:16:46.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8055 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 14:35:22.48 +56:01:42.1: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:38:54.26 +65:44:11.5: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-54-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0243.fits at 12:36:34.09 +65:46:38.8: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 14:35:22.48 +56:01:42.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:22.48 +56:01:42.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:39:56.43 +65:37:56.5: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:32:42.56 +65:05:11.7: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:56.43 +65:37:56.5: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0535 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:42.56 +65:05:11.7: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3959 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:38:54.26 +65:44:11.5: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-05-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0329.fits at 12:36:34.09 +65:46:38.8: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:38:54.26 +65:44:11.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4429 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:34.09 +65:46:38.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3721 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52394_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52394_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.29    14:31:23.62 +57:00:15.4   0645 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52403_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52403_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.29    13:13:22.17 +58:24:14.6   6998 5376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.92    13:13:21.99 +58:24:09.0   6999 5382   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52408_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52408_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.21    12:43:42.51 +59:14:54.2   9275 4633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.01    12:43:42.07 +59:14:56.9   9276 4638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52411_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52411_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.21    13:32:16.30 +59:45:45.9   5520 4568   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.22    13:32:15.62 +59:45:50.4   5521 4572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52412_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52412_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.30    14:39:13.34 +58:18:06.4   0235 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.01    14:39:13.03 +58:18:03.3   0235 4664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52415_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52415_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.16    12:50:46.66 +58:15:10.9   8809 5313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.24    12:50:46.65 +58:15:14.0   8809 5318   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52416_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52416_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.19    13:50:51.08 +66:36:17.8   4507 0374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.79    13:50:51.41 +66:36:18.0   4506 0379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52421_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52421_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.18    14:26:45.97 +62:51:20.1   1850 2220   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.01    14:26:45.65 +62:51:19.7   1851 2226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52423_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52423_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    13.97    12:45:13.57 +66:43:48.1   8439 0155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.65    12:45:13.52 +66:43:52.7   8439 0159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52433_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52433_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    13.79    12:33:41.26 +64:41:50.5   9380 1238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.71    12:33:41.40 +64:41:56.9   9380 1242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52438_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52438_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    13.71    12:44:08.46 +66:31:35.4   8524 0266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.39    12:44:08.56 +66:31:38.0   8524 0271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52444_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52444_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    13.46    12:48:46.71 +66:49:12.7   8219 0135   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.17    12:48:46.82 +66:49:14.7   8218 0139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52647_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52647_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    13.12    14:23:54.81 +56:18:00.6   1157 6149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.13    14:23:54.65 +56:18:00.8   1157 6154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52718_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52718_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.30    12:43:28.66 +65:57:17.0   8621 0609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits **** FOUND 12:43:28.94 +65:57:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52735_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52735_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    13.56    14:30:06.03 +56:05:59.1   0613 6152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.59    14:30:06.13 +56:06:00.3   0613 6157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52772_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52772_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    13.72    14:34:09.53 +56:05:54.7   0274 6070   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.98    14:34:09.09 +56:05:54.1   0275 6075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52899_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52899_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.14    14:35:00.85 +56:05:04.7   0201 6060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.14    14:35:01.01 +56:05:05.3   0201 6065   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52950_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 52950_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.30    14:30:09.45 +56:14:48.9   0630 6063   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.42    14:30:09.33 +56:14:49.2   0631 6069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53000_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 53000_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.38    14:24:41.66 +56:14:35.5   1084 6169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.22    14:24:41.93 +56:14:34.8   1084 6175   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53039_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 53039_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.50    14:13:57.14 +56:23:57.6   1996 6252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.79    14:13:56.84 +56:23:55.9   1997 6258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53077_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 53077_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.59    13:01:47.14 +61:21:28.7   7749 3532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.63    13:01:47.39 +61:21:30.7   7749 3537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53104_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 53104_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    14.81    14:12:58.98 +57:16:46.1   2174 5738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    14.81    14:12:59.11 +57:16:47.6   2174 5743   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28538_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 28538_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.06    13:01:53.89 +65:54:05.8   7486 0798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits **** FOUND 13:01:53.87 +65:54:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50236_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 50236_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.08    12:39:56.38 +65:37:56.8   8874 0758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.03    12:39:56.47 +65:37:56.1   8874 0763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50195_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 50195_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.44    12:32:42.62 +65:05:11.6   9395 0992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.36    12:32:42.50 +65:05:11.7   9395 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50192_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 50192_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.45    12:38:54.28 +65:44:11.6   8928 0683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.44    12:38:54.23 +65:44:11.4   8928 0688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50033_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 50033_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    13.38    12:36:34.18 +65:46:38.2   9069 0629   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    13.36    12:36:34.00 +65:46:39.4   9069 0634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34040_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 34040_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    10.21    14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5   2028 1652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits **** FOUND 14:26:10.28 +63:50:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00583_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 The candidate 00583_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.34813    2461172.84813    12.44    14:35:22.53 +56:01:42.2   0161 6086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0310.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.34866    2461172.84866    12.44    14:35:22.43 +56:01:41.9   0161 6091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_032809_TTUQ1b1x1_3087784_Ow0IoSd1/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_03-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0311.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5 ########### Completed UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5 ################################################################################### 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 14:26:10.29 +63:50:45.5 13:25:56.49 +62:22:52.1 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461172.84813304 -observatory V36 03:04:39.80 +17:06:24.1 Mercury (-2.1mag) 05:23:03.92 +24:31:49.9 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:32:32.29 +08:48:10.7 Mars (1.2mag) 07:27:52.07 +22:18:10.1 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:40:15.17 +01:56:26.4 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:53:42.65 +20:06:14.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:13:57.08 +00:03:54.9 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:13.63 -22:56:17.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 23:27:01.22 -02:57:37.7 Moon (-9.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 12 03:33 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461172.84813304: 07:27:46.68 +22:18:24.6 Io (5.9mag) 07:27:56.89 +22:17:55.9 Europa (6.1mag) 07:27:52.43 +22:18:15.6 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:27:23.05 +22:19:23.3 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:29:47.75 +21:56:35.2 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:27:53.87 +22:18:04.0 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:30:15.73 +22:23:11.4 Elara (17.4mag) 07:28:29.54 +22:44:19.4 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:35:28.59 +22:18:09.6 Carme (18.7mag) 00:40:25.35 +01:56:13.5 Titan (8.7mag) 00:40:11.65 +01:56:39.0 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:40:05.55 +01:54:33.3 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:40:05.61 +01:56:49.4 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:41:27.86 +02:02:05.1 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 12 03:33 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461172.84813304: 16:59:30.34 -29:37:00.2 JWST 05:14:55.87 -38:10:42.2 Chandra 08:54:38.66 -50:30:05.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 12 03:33 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461172.84813304 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 07:49:25.27 +25:15:57.3 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:55:20.53 -30:34:31.4 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:28:08.36 -68:37:27.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:39:40.38 +31:39:33.5 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:24:44.03 +13:23:26.3 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:38.73 +30:24:18.8 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:00:56.52 +26:38:48.4 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:13:06.50 +31:49:14.4 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:38:11.09 +02:15:33.1 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:43:55.88 +20:29:20.4 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:30:21.11 -11:09:29.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:00:16.02 -08:10:52.8 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:13:00.08 +64:40:05.1 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:44:46.90 -04:37:04.6 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 15:49:34.57 +88:04:16.1 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:37:56.99 +63:39:06.7 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:03:42.18 +24:31:51.6 12.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:59:27.30 +10:27:01.2 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:23:13.14 +22:55:11.7 14.3mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:51:15.99 -18:46:16.1 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:40:34.55 +39:27:33.0 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:09:40.02 +53:12:33.8 16.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 05:41:10.30 -08:05:06.4 10.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:44:09.79 +04:16:58.8 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 05:28:51.63 +01:20:32.2 17.9mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 01:06:44.84 +41:00:31.8 15.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:33:39.01 -08:23:22.6 10.3mag 10P/Tempel 14:28:09.13 -00:21:09.3 16.4mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:01.24 -00:56:02.4 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:43:29.06 -02:43:09.3 17.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:29:47.36 +21:46:18.2 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:03:05.64 +30:56:03.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:00:25.62 -08:33:57.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:18:39.18 +28:54:34.4 16.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:05:24.06 +13:08:11.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:16:49.73 -01:47:21.8 15.0mag 88P/Howell 03:29:00.13 +26:42:59.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:48:49.62 +33:15:26.9 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:05:27.27 +26:22:51.5 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos 03:15:01.47 +17:05:04.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:39:51.41 +17:16:27.7 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 03:48:11.62 +19:13:24.6 11.5mag 141P/Machholz 03:52:20.28 +13:34:35.3 11.4mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:32:46.27 +09:49:31.7 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:37:43.47 -29:02:58.7 17.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:17:51.29 +11:41:40.1 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:11:44.86 -10:44:42.1 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 06:33:22.90 +35:52:24.5 17.2mag 240P/NEAT 07:55:05.40 -02:50:26.0 18.0mag 242P/Spahr 23:23:12.59 -12:52:36.2 17.1mag 260P/McNaught 02:56:04.53 +26:51:44.5 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR 15:29:28.38 +08:13:53.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:47:48.36 +21:15:01.7 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:16:25.76 +43:28:07.9 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K May 12 03:33 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 12 03:33 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 12 03:33 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 15:08:03.565 +59:43:20.93 AT 2026lnr 2026-05-07.24 19.8187 13:19:56.192 +04:42:46.60 AT 2026lnq 2026-05-07.23 19.7266 13:42:37.932 +03:25:31.87 AT 2026lnp 2026-05-07.23 19.3378 13:05:48.294 -23:51:09.88 AT 2026lno 2026-05-07.23 19.2731 13:28:10.220 -24:58:07.02 AT 2026lnn 2026-05-07.23 19.1862 13:01:10.346 -26:29:29.03 AT 2026lnm 2026-05-07.21 19.8458 13:06:44.896 +73:12:18.55 AT 2026lnl 2026-05-07.22 18.8585 16:53:20.972 +24:45:10.02 AT 2026lnk 2026-04-29.39 20.1096 15:20:12.330 +05:17:27.37 AT 2026lnj 2026-04-23.40 20.1549 17:43:07.678 +22:57:21.39 AT 2026lni 2026-04-23.41 20.7995 16:52:47.004 +68:05:03.93 AT 2026lnh 2026-05-06.48 18.813 11:50:05.757 +07:28:43.49 AT 2026lng 2026-05-07.19 19.3993 10:13:11.650 +10:44:10.92 AT 2026lnf 2026-05-07.20 19.5524 13:47:31.946 -04:25:18.73 AT 2026lne 2026-04-28.36 19.7647 14:21:34.611 +52:09:51.86 AT 2026lnd 2026-04-28.38 20.0861 13:52:20.676 +51:56:47.09 AT 2026lnc 2026-05-07.24 19.4231 14:12:02.479 +08:55:50.34 AT 2026lnb 2026-04-15.42 20.4511 14:54:28.469 -01:36:18.19 AT 2026lna 2026-04-23.34 20.2666 16:46:01.930 +52:07:14.56 AT 2026lmz 2026-04-28.46 20.4175 12:23:24.705 +07:03:02.11 AT 2026lmy 2026-05-02.22 19.5671 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 12 03:33 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C