This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.3152 2461172.8152 11.91 16:07:57.01 -13:39:20.7
358.69489 27.27533 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 2 -1 2 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:07:57.01 -13:39:20.7: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:07:57.01 -13:39:20.7: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.8152,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.3152 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.3152 2461172.8152 12.48 15:50:04.68 -08:49:34.0
359.58573 33.75062 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.776 Berbericia 2 -1 2 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:50:04.68 -08:49:34.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:50:04.68 -08:49:34.0: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.8152,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.3152 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.3152 2461172.8152 12.90 16:09:50.61 -08:21:35.3
3.69240 30.29012 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.559 Nanon 2 -1 2 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:09:50.61 -08:21:35.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:09:50.61 -08:21:35.3: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.8152,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.3152 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.3152 2461172.8152 13.27 15:59:17.17 -13:37:32.2
357.14276 28.87415 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika 1 -2 2 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:59:17.17 -13:37:32.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:59:17.17 -13:37:32.2: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.8152,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.3152 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.3152 2461172.8152 12.82 16:39:17.20 -05:32:31.5
11.15229 26.03430 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 1 -1 2 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:39:17.20 -05:32:31.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:39:17.20 -05:32:31.5: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.8152,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.3152 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
First image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Last image: 2461172.81639256 12.05.2026 07:35:26.317 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 58
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7834
Objects passed selection criteria: 7831
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7125
Average stars matched: 6724 (94.3719 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 02:42:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
First image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Last image: 2461172.81639256 12.05.2026 07:35:26.317 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55728
Objects passed selection criteria: 55637
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 49337.8
Average stars matched: 47412.8 (96.0983 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 158620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 02:45:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.81406030
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5972 high-SNR stars for plate solving
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 8121 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out429131.xyls"...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out429129.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 938.0'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.767 -09:59:38.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7722 stars ###
### Converted positions of 5066 stars ###
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky430272.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky430246.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out429129.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out429131.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 75.8337 (8.59301e+32), 11 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (244.286,-9.95652), pixel scale 5.97278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+---+---+-------+-+-+---+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
log-odds ratio 79.5165 (3.41637e+34), 18 match, 0 conflict, 44 distractors, 45 index.
RA,Dec = (244.293,-9.94961), pixel scale 5.9714 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----+--+--++-++-++-+---+-----+-+--------+--++--+-----------+(best)--------------------------------------
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out429129.solved to indicate this.
Field: out429129.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.290166, -9.954808) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:17:09.640, -09:57:17.307).
Field size: 15.7915 x 10.5751 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.53562 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits' -> 'fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out429131.solved to indicate this.
Field: out429131.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.298869, -9.947138) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:17:11.729, -09:56:49.698).
Field size: 15.7927 x 10.5771 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.53449 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:42 fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:42 out429129.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits' -> 'fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits'
Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:42 fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:42 out429131.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits (fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits (fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out429129.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out429131.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out429129.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7217 degrees of RA,Dec (244.291,-9.95403)
log-odds ratio 75.8337 (8.59301e+32), 11 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (244.286,-9.95652), pixel scale 5.97278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+---+---+-------+-+-+---+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out429129.solved to indicate this.
Field: out429129.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.290918, -9.955088) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:17:09.820, -09:57:18.317).
Field size: 15.7478 x 10.5697 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.52855 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:42 fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:42 out429129.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits)... done!
Reading file "./out429131.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7233 degrees of RA,Dec (244.3,-9.94636)
log-odds ratio 72.9656 (4.88154e+31), 12 match, 0 conflict, 23 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (244.295,-9.94778), pixel scale 5.97542 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-----+---+---+-+-+-+---+-+---+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------
done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out429131.solved to indicate this.
Field: out429131.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.299979, -9.946555) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:17:11.995, -09:56:47.597).
Field size: 15.7559 x 10.5768 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.53164 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:42 fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:42 out429131.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 27335 sources.
simplexy: found 43832 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7446, 955.571] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 54.7174 (5.80042e+23), 11 match, 0 conflict, 184 distractors, 11 index.
RA,Dec = (244.29,-9.95587), pixel scale 5.98729 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +------+-----------+--------------------------------+----------------+--------+----------+----------
--> log-odds 54.7174
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 197.389 (5.30581e+85), 22 match, 0 conflict, 179 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (244.29,-9.95587), pixel scale 5.98729 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +------+------+-+--+--------+------+-+--+------+-+--+--------+-------+--------+---------++----------
--> log-odds 197.389
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 437.49 (9.98518e+189), 44 match, 0 conflict, 157 distractors, 45 index.
RA,Dec = (244.29,-9.95587), pixel scale 5.98729 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-----+-+-++-+-+-++-----+-+++----++-++-+-+---++-++-+--+----++---+---+-------++---------++------+---
--> log-odds 437.49
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 839.52 (inf), 87 match, 0 conflict, 162 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (244.29,-9.95587), pixel scale 5.98729 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-----+-+-++-+-++++----+++++++++-++-++++-+--+++-++++-++-+-+++-+++-+++++++---++------++-++-+-++++---
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7651, 955.877] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 839.52
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1495.49 (inf), 172 match, 0 conflict, 325 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (244.29,-9.95587), pixel scale 5.98729 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++-++++-++++++--++++++++++-++++++++-++++++-+++++++-+-+++-+++++++++++-++++-+++-+++-++++++++++++
--> log-odds 15.8167
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 99.5987 (1.79951e+43), 22 match, 0 conflict, 467 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (244.299,-9.94733), pixel scale 5.98921 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+-+-----+-----------+--------------------------------+----+--+---------+-----+---------------
--> log-odds 1495.49
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2815.34 (inf), 344 match, 0 conflict, 614 distractors, 379 index.
RA,Dec = (244.29,-9.95587), pixel scale 5.98729 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++-++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 99.5987
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 355.616 (2.76778e+154), 43 match, 0 conflict, 446 distractors, 45 index.
RA,Dec = (244.299,-9.94733), pixel scale 5.98921 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----+-+-+---+-----------+------+-+------+-----------+----+-+--+-++-------+-+---+-++-----+--------
--> log-odds 2815.34
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 4955.48 (inf), 650 match, 0 conflict, 1121 distractors, 721 index.
RA,Dec = (244.29,-9.95587), pixel scale 5.98729 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 355.616
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 776.888 (inf), 86 match, 0 conflict, 483 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (244.299,-9.94733), pixel scale 5.98921 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++----+-+-++--+----+-----++---+--+-+-+--+-++----+-+---+----+-++-+-++---+---+++---+-++---+-+---+--+-
--> log-odds 4955.48
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 8809.67 (inf), 1280 match, 0 conflict, 2249 distractors, 1459 index.
RA,Dec = (244.29,-9.95587), pixel scale 5.98729 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 776.888
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1532.43 (inf), 175 match, 0 conflict, 410 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (244.299,-9.94733), pixel scale 5.98921 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+-++++-+++++--+-+--+-+++-+++-++-+++-+++++-++--+++-++++--+-++-+-++--++-+++++++-++++--++-+---+--++
--> log-odds 8809.67
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.291322, -9.956859) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:17:09.917, -09:57:24.691).
Field size: 15.7637 x 10.5707 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.53559 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.new"...
--> log-odds 1532.43
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2968.87 (inf), 349 match, 0 conflict, 525 distractors, 379 index.
RA,Dec = (244.299,-9.94733), pixel scale 5.98921 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++++-+++++--+-++++-+++-+++-++-++++++++++++-++++-++++-++-++-+-++++++++++++-+++-++-+++-+-+++-+++
renamed 'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
--> log-odds 2968.87
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5257.74 (inf), 663 match, 0 conflict, 979 distractors, 722 index.
RA,Dec = (244.299,-9.94733), pixel scale 5.98921 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++++-+++++-++-++++-+++-+++-++-++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++-+-++++++++++++++++-++++++-+++++++++
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.132 -09:57:21.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7269 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky547192.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
--> log-odds 5257.74
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 9328.91 (inf), 1300 match, 0 conflict, 2053 distractors, 1462 index.
RA,Dec = (244.299,-9.94733), pixel scale 5.98921 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++++-+++++-++-++++-+++-+++-++-++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++-+--+++++++++++++++-++++++-+++++++++
--> log-odds 9328.91
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.300380, -9.947850) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:17:12.091, -09:56:52.259).
Field size: 15.7696 x 10.5748 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.53511 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.306 -09:56:49.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8604 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky553561.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.132 -09:57:21.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:10.132 -09:57:21.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.306 -09:56:49.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:12.306 -09:56:49.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0540 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:10.132 -09:57:21.89
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:12.306 -09:56:49.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01268 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vQuqN7g9CI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J8NttMnchY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fL5J5JfLn6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r6eNbgVVdm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Loaded 4809 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3998 out of 4171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4171 out of 7722 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Loaded 4809 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3998 out of 4171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4171 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5066 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.2082 to 252.3187 deg, Dec -15.2481 to -4.6756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.2082 to 252.3187 deg, Dec -15.2481 to -4.6756 deg
Loaded 4791 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3538 out of 3621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3621 out of 5066 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.4 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
4.9 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
14.5 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vQuqN7g9CI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=7719
Got 7719 stars (including 7254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7719 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=262 n_q2=215 n_q3=262 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.J8NttMnchY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, passed=5066
Got 5066 stars (including 4773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=279 n_q2=221 n_q3=254 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fL5J5JfLn6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=299, passed=7269
Got 7269 stars (including 6966 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=253 n_q2=214 n_q3=272 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.450
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r6eNbgVVdm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=426, passed=8604
Got 8604 stars (including 8165 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8604 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=286 n_q2=213 n_q3=259 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:48:00.87 -08:21:39.7: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:21.65 -12:11:58.7: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:58.95 -14:57:22.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:44.28 -13:06:49.1: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:13:43.93 -10:53:07.0: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:21:19.67 -11:35:03.9: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:31:20.39 -05:15:59.9: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:48:00.87 -08:21:39.7: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:00.87 -08:21:39.7: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9448 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:21.65 -12:11:58.7: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:21.65 -12:11:58.7: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9307 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:58.95 -14:57:22.3: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:58.95 -14:57:22.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9519 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:23:41.30 -10:10:27.4: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:44.28 -13:06:49.1: 12.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:44.28 -13:06:49.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6242 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:13:43.93 -10:53:07.0: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:43.93 -10:53:07.0: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9729 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:31:20.39 -05:15:59.9: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:20.39 -05:15:59.9: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8349 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:21:19.67 -11:35:03.9: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:19.67 -11:35:03.9: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8747 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:10:52.05 -11:13:46.1: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:23:41.30 -10:10:27.4: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:41.30 -10:10:27.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0522 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:20:50.22 -09:15:17.6: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:10:52.05 -11:13:46.1: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:52.05 -11:13:46.1: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0426 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:17:31.16 -09:06:24.4: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:18:38.81 -05:46:01.8: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:33.57 -10:11:37.9: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:18:39.31 -15:06:08.8: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:50:41.47 -08:06:15.0: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:20:50.22 -09:15:17.6: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:12.98 -08:37:14.1: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:50.22 -09:15:17.6: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1394 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:57:50.58 -08:52:48.7: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:17:31.16 -09:06:24.4: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:08:49.75 -07:04:19.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:31.16 -09:06:24.4: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0778 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:18:38.81 -05:46:01.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:33.57 -10:11:37.9: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:38.81 -05:46:01.8: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0972 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:33.57 -10:11:37.9: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0845 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:18:39.31 -15:06:08.8: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:39.31 -15:06:08.8: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2010 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:50:41.47 -08:06:15.0: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:41.47 -08:06:15.0: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1092 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:12.98 -08:37:14.1: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:12.98 -08:37:14.1: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0752 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:11:39.61 -09:27:02.6: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:57:50.58 -08:52:48.7: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:08:49.75 -07:04:19.0: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:49.75 -07:04:19.0: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1391 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:50.58 -08:52:48.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1087 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:05.29 -08:10:50.4: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:11:39.61 -09:27:02.6: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:39.61 -09:27:02.6: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1205 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:15:51.19 -06:27:43.2: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:48.57 -06:18:38.5: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:05.29 -08:10:50.4: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:05.29 -08:10:50.4: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1380 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:13:34.78 -09:30:35.1: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:12:28.17 -05:52:01.3: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:14:26.48 -09:13:04.9: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:15:51.19 -06:27:43.2: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:20:09.45 -08:31:56.4: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:51.19 -06:27:43.2: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2227 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:48.57 -06:18:38.5: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:48.57 -06:18:38.5: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1676 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:13:34.78 -09:30:35.1: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:34.78 -09:30:35.1: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1050 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:14:26.48 -09:13:04.9: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:12:28.17 -05:52:01.3: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:26.48 -09:13:04.9: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2030 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:20:09.45 -08:31:56.4: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:09.45 -08:31:56.4: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1716 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:28.17 -05:52:01.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2315 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:30:18.83 -05:38:36.6: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:07:29.44 -12:13:28.8: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:58:38.38 -05:30:59.4: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:30:18.83 -05:38:36.6: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:18.83 -05:38:36.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2960 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:07:29.44 -12:13:28.8: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:29.44 -12:13:28.8: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2234 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:58:38.38 -05:30:59.4: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:57:26.22 -07:32:51.1: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:38.38 -05:30:59.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2486 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:31:40.08 -08:00:39.9: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:18:01.21 -05:06:11.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:37.06 -07:55:35.7: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:14:44.09 -08:06:35.4: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:47:22.99 -08:46:12.6: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:57:26.22 -07:32:51.1: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:26.22 -07:32:51.1: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1924 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:31:40.08 -08:00:39.9: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:40:56.00 -14:37:45.6: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:40.08 -08:00:39.9: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2318 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:37.06 -07:55:35.7: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:37.06 -07:55:35.7: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2101 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:45:42.74 -11:20:01.3: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:08:25.62 -07:14:57.0: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:10:49.52 -05:29:16.8: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:14:44.09 -08:06:35.4: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:18:01.21 -05:06:11.9: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:44.09 -08:06:35.4: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2086 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:01.21 -05:06:11.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2995 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:47:22.99 -08:46:12.6: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:22.99 -08:46:12.6: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1856 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:40:56.00 -14:37:45.6: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:56.00 -14:37:45.6: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2576 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:08:25.62 -07:14:57.0: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:25.62 -07:14:57.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2373 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:45:42.74 -11:20:01.3: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:42.74 -11:20:01.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2102 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:10:49.52 -05:29:16.8: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:49.52 -05:29:16.8: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3427 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:00:39.59 -08:36:46.1: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:00:39.59 -08:36:46.1: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:39.59 -08:36:46.1: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2210 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20021_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20021_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:47.45 -06:31:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20124_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20124_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20143_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20143_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20144_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20144_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:19.16 -12:47:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20148_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20148_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20160_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20160_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20169_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20169_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20176_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20176_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20179_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20179_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:27.41 -11:46:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20184_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20184_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20186_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20186_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20189_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20189_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:50.94 -06:52:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20190_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20193_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20193_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20195_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20195_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20197_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20197_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20202_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20202_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20204_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20204_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20205_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20205_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:47.85 -06:41:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20209_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20209_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20213_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20213_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20214_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20214_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20216_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20217_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20220_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20220_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20222_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20222_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20223_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20224_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:29.37 -06:19:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20225_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20225_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20229_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20230_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20230_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:26.76 -05:33:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20231_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20231_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20232_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20237_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20237_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:17.11 -12:36:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20238_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20238_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20239_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20239_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:35.57 -05:51:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20240_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20240_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20242_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20242_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20243_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20243_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:40.33 -08:07:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20245_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20245_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20247_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20247_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20248_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20248_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20249_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20249_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:09.41 -06:20:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20251_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20251_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20252_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20252_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20253_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20253_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20255_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20255_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20258_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20258_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20261_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20261_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20262_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20262_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20263_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 20263_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.132 -09:57:21.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.767 -09:59:38.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.306 -09:56:49.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 35250 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1149083.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
### Converted positions of 40555 stars ###
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1149248.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
### Converted positions of 60755 stars ###
### Converted positions of 62439 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1149825.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1149926.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.132 -09:57:21.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:10.132 -09:57:21.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.306 -09:56:49.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:12.306 -09:56:49.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0540 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:10.132 -09:57:21.89
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:12.306 -09:56:49.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01268 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PGGPmaLVin
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y3gYAja9yO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BoKpV8Wqav
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ppJS5rMF68
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62439 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Loaded 4831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3832 out of 4290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4290 out of 62439 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62439 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Loaded 4831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3832 out of 4290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4290 out of 62439 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 40555 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1835 to 252.3628 deg, Dec -15.2669 to -4.6542 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1835 to 252.3628 deg, Dec -15.2669 to -4.6542 deg
Loaded 4815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3958 out of 4238 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4238 out of 40555 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
4.3 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
14.7 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PGGPmaLVin (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2730, passed=62428
Got 62428 stars (including 59597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62428 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=269 n_q2=218 n_q3=263 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y3gYAja9yO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1580, passed=40542
Got 40542 stars (including 38911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40542 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.552 n_q1=281 n_q2=231 n_q3=232 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BoKpV8Wqav (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2737, passed=35240
Got 35240 stars (including 32484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.687 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=242 n_q2=210 n_q3=281 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.530
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ppJS5rMF68 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2803, passed=60742
Got 60742 stars (including 57859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60742 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=282 n_q2=216 n_q3=265 n_q4=205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-32-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_023833_TTUQ1b1x1_231317_wJ2f24Zh/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:40:27.21 -10:01:31.7: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:48:53.50 -12:50:57.8: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:44:18.16 -14:58:33.9: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:44:59.61 -14:13:54.7: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:47:19.46 -06:07:05.5: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:52:43.77 -06:42:00.4: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:50:13.50 -07:13:42.3: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:46:14.68 -09:12:07.0: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:20.54 -11:51:42.5: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:44:22.35 -14:56:12.0: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:40:27.21 -10:01:31.7: 13.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:48:53.50 -12:50:57.8: 13.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:27.21 -10:01:31.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6987 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:46:14.68 -09:12:07.0: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:53.50 -12:50:57.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6244 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:44:18.16 -14:58:33.9: 13.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:14.68 -09:12:07.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6270 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:18.16 -14:58:33.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3116 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:52:43.77 -06:42:00.4: 14.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:50:13.50 -07:13:42.3: 13.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:44:59.61 -14:13:54.7: 13.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:43.77 -06:42:00.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0354 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:20.54 -11:51:42.5: 13.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:13.50 -07:13:42.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7402 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:59.61 -14:13:54.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5334 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:20.54 -11:51:42.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5541 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:47:19.46 -06:07:05.5: 14.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:19.46 -06:07:05.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8344 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:44:22.35 -14:56:12.0: 13.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:22.35 -14:56:12.0: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5245 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:15:46.89 -12:59:15.6: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:07:57.01 -13:39:20.7: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:50:04.68 -08:49:34.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:09:50.61 -08:21:35.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:59:59.13 -07:06:48.4: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:59:17.17 -13:37:32.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:51:22.31 -04:59:39.0: 15.12 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:15:46.89 -12:59:15.6: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:46.89 -12:59:15.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0073 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:07:57.01 -13:39:20.7: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:29.04 -08:37:43.1: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:50:04.68 -08:49:34.0: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:33:17.55 -06:35:53.0: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:09:50.61 -08:21:35.3: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:59:59.13 -07:06:48.4: 14.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:59:17.17 -13:37:32.2: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:44:34.45 -06:39:57.5: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:51:22.31 -04:59:39.0: 14.57 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:59.13 -07:06:48.4: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8820 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:51:22.31 -04:59:39.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.9298 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:33:17.55 -06:35:53.0: 14.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:29.04 -08:37:43.1: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:17.55 -06:35:53.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3278 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:29.04 -08:37:43.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0669 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:44:34.45 -06:39:57.5: 14.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:34.45 -06:39:57.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3168 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:47.87 -06:34:23.6: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:55.79 -06:11:04.5: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:43:45.31 -05:17:49.9: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:48:29.89 -07:06:59.9: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:47.87 -06:34:23.6: 14.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:47.87 -06:34:23.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4121 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:55.79 -06:11:04.5: 14.71 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:24.22 -07:40:12.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:55.79 -06:11:04.5: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5422 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:43:45.31 -05:17:49.9: 14.91 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:45.31 -05:17:49.9: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5468 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:48:29.89 -07:06:59.9: 14.60 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:29.89 -07:06:59.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4682 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:24.22 -07:40:12.2: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:24.22 -07:40:12.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5576 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:44:04.27 -05:44:03.0: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:36:41.07 -05:19:55.8: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:36:16.96 -05:53:15.5: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:47:53.61 -05:56:37.1: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:47:54.68 -06:32:26.6: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:44:04.27 -05:44:03.0: 14.92 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:36:41.07 -05:19:55.8: 14.43 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:04.27 -05:44:03.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6106 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:41.07 -05:19:55.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4646 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:42:33.61 -07:46:09.7: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:36:16.96 -05:53:15.5: 14.84 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:16.96 -05:53:15.5: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6515 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:47:53.61 -05:56:37.1: 14.56 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:53.61 -05:56:37.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4802 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:47:54.68 -06:32:26.6: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:54.68 -06:32:26.6: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.5491 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:42:33.61 -07:46:09.7: 14.77 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:33.61 -07:46:09.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6288 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:43:54.02 -06:06:06.1: 15.38 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:30:19.36 -06:56:40.6: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:14.24 -06:10:45.6: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:40:35.42 -05:41:24.9: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:48:05.78 -06:01:20.5: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:43:54.02 -06:06:06.1: 14.65 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:54.02 -06:06:06.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6728 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:30:19.36 -06:56:40.6: 14.57 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.36 -06:56:40.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5288 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:14.24 -06:10:45.6: 14.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:14.24 -06:10:45.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5452 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:17:41.10 -12:04:38.0: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:48:05.78 -06:01:20.5: 14.86 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:05.78 -06:01:20.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7001 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:40:35.42 -05:41:24.9: 15.02 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:35.42 -05:41:24.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6150 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:17:41.10 -12:04:38.0: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:41.10 -12:04:38.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4686 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:38:12.52 -07:47:21.7: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:24:44.27 -08:47:39.2: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:42:44.33 -08:10:00.9: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:38:12.18 -10:46:50.9: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:40:59.85 -05:47:15.3: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:38:12.52 -07:47:21.7: 14.56 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:12.52 -07:47:21.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6735 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:24:44.27 -08:47:39.2: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:44.27 -08:47:39.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5001 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:42:44.33 -08:10:00.9: 14.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:44.33 -08:10:00.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6390 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:40:13.14 -07:39:42.2: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:38:12.18 -10:46:50.9: 14.79 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:12.18 -10:46:50.9: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7235 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:40:59.85 -05:47:15.3: 15.11 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:59.85 -05:47:15.3: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8085 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:40:13.14 -07:39:42.2: 14.62 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:13.14 -07:39:42.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7022 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:36:49.03 -07:18:44.4: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:42:07.83 -09:30:58.1: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:01.95 -05:17:07.2: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:26:52.41 -08:10:07.8: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:36:49.03 -07:18:44.4: 14.77 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:42:07.83 -09:30:58.1: 14.70 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:49.03 -07:18:44.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7481 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:07.83 -09:30:58.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6855 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:30:45.48 -05:13:48.0: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:01.95 -05:17:07.2: 14.84 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:01.95 -05:17:07.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6716 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:26:52.41 -08:10:07.8: 15.02 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:52.41 -08:10:07.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5927 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:26:41.40 -06:31:31.8: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:30:45.48 -05:13:48.0: 14.56 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:45.48 -05:13:48.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7853 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:26:41.40 -06:31:31.8: 14.70 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:41.40 -06:31:31.8: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7392 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:42:26.81 -05:31:24.4: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:38:21.97 -05:38:43.7: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:13.58 -05:45:41.6: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:58.18 -05:16:02.5: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:29:16.28 -06:46:56.0: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:38:21.97 -05:38:43.7: 14.91 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:42:26.81 -05:31:24.4: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:21.97 -05:38:43.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7687 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:26.81 -05:31:24.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7252 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:13.58 -05:45:41.6: 15.26 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:13.58 -05:45:41.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8775 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:58.18 -05:16:02.5: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:58.18 -05:16:02.5: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8747 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:26:01.89 -08:00:00.3: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:29:16.28 -06:46:56.0: 15.07 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:16.28 -06:46:56.0: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9451 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:26:01.89 -08:00:00.3: 14.77 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:01.89 -08:00:00.3: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8626 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:31:10.37 -07:24:04.5: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:46.32 -07:26:01.4: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:39:17.20 -05:32:31.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:31:10.37 -07:24:04.5: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:10.37 -07:24:04.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8485 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:46.32 -07:26:01.4: 14.90 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:46.32 -07:26:01.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7822 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:39:17.20 -05:32:31.5: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73766.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73163.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73234.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73349.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73593.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72920_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72920_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72922_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72922_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72923_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72923_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72926_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72926_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72927_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72927_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:44.47 -05:55:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72930_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72930_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72944_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72944_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72945_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72945_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72951_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72951_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72953_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72953_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72962_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72962_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72975_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72975_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:09.83 -14:21:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72976_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72976_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72979_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72979_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72984_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72984_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72989_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72989_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:25.60 -14:15:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72991_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72991_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:09.56 -14:21:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72992_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 72992_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73163_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 73163_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73234_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 73234_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73252_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73252_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73349_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 73349_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73554_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73554_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:20.01 -10:46:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73593_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 73593_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73653_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73653_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73709_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73709_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73766_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73766_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:22.31 -04:59:39.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.451 4399013570240298112 237.84288235003 -04.99377074104 14.5633 14.0468 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.451#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73786_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73786_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:44.87 -12:56:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73789_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73789_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73900_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73900_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73906_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73906_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73938_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73938_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:44.97 -05:25:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73965_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73965_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73969_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73969_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73974_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73974_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73981_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73981_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73984_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73984_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73987_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73987_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73993_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73993_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73996_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 73996_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74005_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74005_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74012_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74012_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74013_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74013_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74020_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74020_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:03.64 -11:30:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74021_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74021_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:08.04 -08:07:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74022_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74022_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:47.72 -06:37:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74023_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74023_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74029_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74029_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74041_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74041_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74044_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74044_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:03.75 -10:06:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74045_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74045_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74053_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74053_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74055_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74055_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74057_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74057_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74058_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74058_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74068_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74068_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74074_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74074_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74079_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74079_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74081_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74081_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74083_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74083_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74087_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74087_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74088_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74088_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74089_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74089_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74090_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74090_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74093_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74093_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74104_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74104_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74115_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74115_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74116_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74116_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74117_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74117_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74118_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74118_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74121_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74121_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74123_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 74123_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42427_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
Preparing report for the candidate 42427_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262
The candidate 14434_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-35-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0262 did not pass the final checks
