This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2976 2461172.7976 9.68 14:21:51.90 +03:54:28.0
349.79743 58.29564 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" AO Vir
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.960 V 13.300 : V 2453797.00000 255.000000000000 M2e-M4e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:21:51.90 +03:54:28.0: 11.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:21:51.90 +03:54:28.0: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.66 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2976* 14 21 51.90 +03 54 28.0 9.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AO Vir,2461172.7976,9.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AO Vir 20260512.2976 9.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2976 2461172.7976 13.85 14:54:36.61 +01:31:48.6
357.22744 50.93422 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 3 -3 4 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:54:36.61 +01:31:48.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:54:36.61 +01:31:48.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2976* 14 54 36.61 +01 31 48.6 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7976,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2976 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2976 2461172.7976 14.64 14:29:40.59 +02:38:18.6
350.97207 56.05795 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.986 Amelia 2 0 2 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:29:40.59 +02:38:18.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:29:40.59 +02:38:18.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2976* 14 29 40.59 +02 38 18.6 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7976,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2976 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2976 2461172.7976 14.77 14:15:17.61 +02:19:23.7
345.48715 58.08979 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.590 Tomyris 2 -1 2 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:15:17.61 +02:19:23.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:15:17.61 +02:19:23.7: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2976* 14 15 17.61 +02 19 23.7 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7976,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2976 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2976 2461172.7976 11.38 14:28:03.56 +04:06:33.4
352.22069 57.42078 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSV 20111
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.700 V 13.300 V 2452672.00000 203.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:28:03.56 +04:06:33.4: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:28:03.56 +04:06:33.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2976* 14 28 03.56 +04 06 33.4 11.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 20111,2461172.7976,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 20111 20260512.2976 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.98046007 21.03.2026 11:31:41.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
First image: 2461120.98046007 21.03.2026 11:31:41.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Last image: 2461172.79788756 12.05.2026 07:08:47.485 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7608
Objects passed selection criteria: 7603
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6999
Average stars matched: 6641.25 (94.8886 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 02:21:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.98046007 21.03.2026 11:31:41.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
First image: 2461120.98046007 21.03.2026 11:31:41.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Last image: 2461172.79788756 12.05.2026 07:08:47.485 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 83
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35276
Objects passed selection criteria: 35195
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33743
Average stars matched: 32778.5 (97.1416 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137356 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 02:23:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.79734756
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Choosing aperture...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
The guess is 570 arcmin.
The guess is 570 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6139 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6122 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2556416.xyls"...
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat from image00002.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2556419.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:20.705 +05:58:46.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6881 stars ###
### Converted positions of 5944 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2556809.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2556807.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2556416.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 45.8321 (8.02826e+19), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (218.63,5.9987), pixel scale 5.97023 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----+---++---+----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out2556419.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2556416.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 44.8303 (2.94823e+19), 7 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (218.643,5.9883), pixel scale 5.9703 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----+----++--+------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field: out2556416.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.634291, 5.989463) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:32.230, +05:59:22.068).
Field size: 15.7847 x 10.5759 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.306 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2556419.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2556419.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.646608, 5.979116) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:35.186, +05:58:44.818).
Field size: 15.7848 x 10.5758 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.307 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:21 fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:21 out2556416.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:21 fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:21 out2556419.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits (fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2556416.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2556419.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2556416.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7367 degrees of RA,Dec (218.633,5.98869)
log-odds ratio 45.8321 (8.02826e+19), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (218.63,5.9987), pixel scale 5.97023 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----+---++---+----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2556419.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.735 degrees of RA,Dec (218.646,5.97834)
log-odds ratio 44.8303 (2.94823e+19), 7 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (218.643,5.9883), pixel scale 5.9703 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----+----++--+------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2556416.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2556416.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.635630, 5.990413) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:32.551, +05:59:25.485).
Field size: 15.7678 x 10.5749 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.313 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:21 fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:21 out2556416.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2556419.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2556419.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.647980, 5.980052) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:35.515, +05:58:48.186).
Field size: 15.7677 x 10.5749 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.313 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:21 fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:21 out2556419.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 25320 sources.
simplexy: found 25262 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.712, 955.082] arcmin
Solving...
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 54.8083 (6.35215e+23), 10 match, 0 conflict, 231 distractors, 10 index.
RA,Dec = (218.649,5.98083), pixel scale 5.98422 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+----------------+-------+------+------+--------------------+-----------------+-----------------
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7119, 955.08] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 41.6928 (1.27921e+18), 10 match, 0 conflict, 239 distractors, 10 index.
RA,Dec = (218.637,5.99119), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---------------+-------------+------+-------+---------------------+-------------+-------------------
--> log-odds 54.8083
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 164.823 (3.81866e+71), 21 match, 0 conflict, 300 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (218.649,5.98083), pixel scale 5.98422 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+----------------++------+------+------+--------+------+----+-----------------+-------------+---
--> log-odds 41.6928
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 167.1 (3.72189e+72), 21 match, 0 conflict, 285 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (218.637,5.99119), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+---------+------+------+-----++-------+-------+-------------+-------------+-------------------
--> log-odds 164.823
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 502.638 (1.96241e+218), 51 match, 0 conflict, 302 distractors, 52 index.
RA,Dec = (218.649,5.98083), pixel scale 5.98422 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++--+--+-----+++---+-++----+-+------+-----++----+--++-----++---++--+--+-----------+-------------+--+
--> log-odds 167.1
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 506.56 (9.91618e+219), 51 match, 0 conflict, 295 distractors, 52 index.
RA,Dec = (218.637,5.99119), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +----+++----+--+----+++---++-++--++++-------+-------+----------++-++--+---+-----+-----------------+-
--> log-odds 502.638
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 965.856 (inf), 95 match, 0 conflict, 258 distractors, 98 index.
RA,Dec = (218.649,5.98083), pixel scale 5.98422 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++----+++---+-+++++-+++-+-+--+---+-+++-+-+-+++++-+-++---++--+-++---++---+--+-------+-+---+--+
--> log-odds 506.56
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 967.836 (inf), 95 match, 0 conflict, 251 distractors, 98 index.
RA,Dec = (218.637,5.99119), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---+++--+++-+++---+++++-+++++++++++-----+-+-+-++--+++-+------++-++-+++-+++----+-+-+-----+------++-
--> log-odds 967.836
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1919.51 (inf), 194 match, 0 conflict, 305 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (218.637,5.99119), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++--++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++++++++-+--++++++-+++++++++++++++-+-+++-+-+++++-++++
--> log-odds 965.856
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1916.75 (inf), 194 match, 0 conflict, 344 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (218.649,5.98083), pixel scale 5.98422 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++-+++++++-+++++-+++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++-++-+++-++--++-+
--> log-odds 1919.51
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3428.53 (inf), 367 match, 0 conflict, 450 distractors, 376 index.
RA,Dec = (218.637,5.99119), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 1916.75
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3426.77 (inf), 367 match, 0 conflict, 469 distractors, 376 index.
RA,Dec = (218.649,5.98083), pixel scale 5.98422 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3428.53
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6274.22 (inf), 722 match, 1 conflict, 891 distractors, 735 index.
RA,Dec = (218.637,5.99119), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3426.77
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6277.86 (inf), 723 match, 1 conflict, 882 distractors, 736 index.
RA,Dec = (218.649,5.98083), pixel scale 5.98422 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6274.22
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11474 (inf), 1434 match, 0 conflict, 2652 distractors, 1459 index.
RA,Dec = (218.637,5.99119), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6277.86
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11478.3 (inf), 1435 match, 1 conflict, 2567 distractors, 1460 index.
RA,Dec = (218.649,5.98083), pixel scale 5.98422 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11474
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.635576, 5.990933) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:32.538, +05:59:27.358).
Field size: 15.7671 x 10.5714 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.311 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.new"...
--> log-odds 11478.3
Got 8 solutions.
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.647943, 5.980578) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:35.506, +05:58:50.083).
Field size: 15.767 x 10.5714 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.311 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.new"...
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat from image00003.cat
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits'
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:32.325 +05:59:24.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7659 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2562453.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:35.293 +05:58:47.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7676 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2562524.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:32.325 +05:59:24.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66
Second-epoch image center 14:34:32.325 +05:59:24.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0902 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:35.293 +05:58:47.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66
Second-epoch image center 14:34:35.293 +05:58:47.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1041 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:32.325 +05:59:24.57
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:35.293 +05:58:47.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01608 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fEMuelpgnj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OPnJCxdB2o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xZDpPFeVvR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6xmEYvJaGa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6881 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6514 to 226.5542 deg, Dec +0.6415 to +11.2850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6514 to 226.5542 deg, Dec 0.6415 to 11.2850 deg
Loaded 4024 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3419 out of 6881 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.908900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.908900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6881 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6514 to 226.5542 deg, Dec +0.6415 to +11.2850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6514 to 226.5542 deg, Dec 0.6415 to 11.2850 deg
Loaded 4024 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3419 out of 6881 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5944 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5926 to 226.4838 deg, Dec +0.6132 to +11.2719 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5926 to 226.4838 deg, Dec 0.6132 to 11.2719 deg
Loaded 4037 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3377 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3377 out of 5944 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
2.5 pix Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
4.2 pix fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
4.2 pix fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fEMuelpgnj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=442, passed=6878
Got 6878 stars (including 6429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6878 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.595 n_q1=256 n_q2=237 n_q3=250 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -region wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OPnJCxdB2o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, passed=5944
Got 5944 stars (including 5569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.595 n_q1=252 n_q2=226 n_q3=251 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.494
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits -region wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xZDpPFeVvR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, passed=7659
Got 7659 stars (including 7354 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=265 n_q2=212 n_q3=265 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6xmEYvJaGa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, passed=7676
Got 7676 stars (including 7364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.514 n_q1=270 n_q2=210 n_q3=263 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.388
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:34:10.15 +04:51:09.6: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:38:51.09 +05:47:40.1: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:46:29.48 +01:46:23.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:58:01.51 +09:24:06.5: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:31:12.94 +01:30:38.3: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:47:33.60 +04:26:50.2: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:50:44.00 +02:25:55.2: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:52:36.83 +08:28:35.4: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:44:01.21 +06:38:06.6: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:34:13.42 +04:19:48.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:46:29.48 +01:46:23.6: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:38:51.09 +05:47:40.1: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:31:12.94 +01:30:38.3: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:50:44.00 +02:25:55.2: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:47:33.60 +04:26:50.2: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:58:01.51 +09:24:06.5: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:52:36.83 +08:28:35.4: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:34:10.15 +04:51:09.6: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:01.51 +09:24:06.5: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7688 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:44.00 +02:25:55.2: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2855 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:51.09 +05:47:40.1: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3328 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:12.94 +01:30:38.3: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0416 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:33.60 +04:26:50.2: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3612 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:29.48 +01:46:23.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3830 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:10.15 +04:51:09.6: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2366 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:36.83 +08:28:35.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2431 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:34:13.42 +04:19:48.3: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:13.42 +04:19:48.3: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3796 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:44:01.21 +06:38:06.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:01.21 +06:38:06.6: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3970 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:05:00.04 +08:21:29.7: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:49:19.74 +04:24:15.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:37:23.11 +02:48:51.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:25:51.24 +02:39:50.1: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:59:27.47 +10:38:44.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:21:51.90 +03:54:28.0: 11.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:37:23.11 +02:48:51.4: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:05:00.04 +08:21:29.7: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:59:27.47 +10:38:44.2: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:25:51.24 +02:39:50.1: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:00.04 +08:21:29.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4014 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:23.11 +02:48:51.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4510 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:27.47 +10:38:44.2: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4478 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:25:51.24 +02:39:50.1: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4099 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:49:19.74 +04:24:15.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:21:51.90 +03:54:28.0: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:19.74 +04:24:15.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3870 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:21:51.90 +03:54:28.0: ref_mag=10.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6802 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04795.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20185_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20185_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:45:30.03 +00:43:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20294_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20294_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20318_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20318_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20336_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20340_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20343_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20343_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20354_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:17.98 +08:30:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20358_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20358_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20359_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20364_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20367_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20368_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20369_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20370_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20370_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20375_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20375_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20377_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20377_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20378_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 20378_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04795_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
Preparing report for the candidate 04795_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
14:21:51.90 +03:54:28.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:35.293 +05:58:47.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:32.325 +05:59:24.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:20.705 +05:58:46.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 31247 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 31275 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2584593.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2584596.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
### Converted positions of 34124 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2584618.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
### Converted positions of 39488 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2584649.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:32.325 +05:59:24.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66
Second-epoch image center 14:34:32.325 +05:59:24.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0902 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:35.293 +05:58:47.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66
Second-epoch image center 14:34:35.293 +05:58:47.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1041 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:32.325 +05:59:24.57
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:35.293 +05:58:47.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01608 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wM5nSMqDQj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cij1ayMPJv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8yyEK2eqJL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CnmUTrsF5R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 39488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6471 to 226.5782 deg, Dec +0.6415 to +11.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6471 to 226.5782 deg, Dec 0.6415 to 11.2955 deg
Loaded 4037 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3115 out of 3434 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3434 out of 39488 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.783000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.783000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 39488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6471 to 226.5782 deg, Dec +0.6415 to +11.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6471 to 226.5782 deg, Dec 0.6415 to 11.2955 deg
Loaded 4037 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3115 out of 3434 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3434 out of 39488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 34124 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5529 to 226.4852 deg, Dec +0.6132 to +11.2746 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5529 to 226.4852 deg, Dec 0.6132 to 11.2746 deg
Loaded 4053 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3173 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 34124 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
2.2 pix Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
3.7 pix fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
3.7 pix fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wM5nSMqDQj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1720, passed=39465
Got 39465 stars (including 37692 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39465 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.578 n_q1=262 n_q2=238 n_q3=244 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -region wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cij1ayMPJv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1344, passed=34102
Got 34102 stars (including 32727 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34102 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=242 n_q2=246 n_q3=243 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.427
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits -region wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8yyEK2eqJL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1200, passed=31239
Got 31239 stars (including 30013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=265 n_q2=213 n_q3=268 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.507
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CnmUTrsF5R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1253, passed=31258
Got 31258 stars (including 29967 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=269 n_q2=212 n_q3=261 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.348
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_021625_TTUQ1b1x1_2520538_UYNqy1iz/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:30:49.65 +02:01:28.2: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:10:23.82 +07:50:16.1: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:03:21.42 +03:08:44.1: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:45:04.61 +03:50:02.9: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:05:42.52 +10:18:40.1: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:58:27.41 +04:31:04.8: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:56:30.92 +01:33:48.9: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:05:00.47 +01:26:17.3: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:03:21.42 +03:08:44.1: 14.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:45:04.61 +03:50:02.9: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:10:23.82 +07:50:16.1: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:21.42 +03:08:44.1: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6786 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:23.82 +07:50:16.1: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2201 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:04.61 +03:50:02.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4227 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:30:49.65 +02:01:28.2: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:49.65 +02:01:28.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7013 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:56:30.92 +01:33:48.9: 14.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:05:42.52 +10:18:40.1: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:58:27.41 +04:31:04.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:42.52 +10:18:40.1: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1692 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:30.92 +01:33:48.9: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2990 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:27.41 +04:31:04.8: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9481 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:05:00.47 +01:26:17.3: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:00.47 +01:26:17.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2353 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:54:36.61 +01:31:48.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:02:59.03 +01:51:28.5: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:06:10.05 +03:42:55.1: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:02:59.03 +01:51:28.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:59.03 +01:51:28.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:49:04.70 +05:41:44.5: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:02:53.67 +02:21:35.0: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:01:18.47 +06:17:48.8: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:02:53.67 +02:21:35.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:53.67 +02:21:35.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:04:21.15 +02:22:40.5: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:54:36.61 +01:31:48.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:06:10.05 +03:42:55.1: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:10.05 +03:42:55.1: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9370 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:49:04.70 +05:41:44.5: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:05:33.71 +07:38:30.0: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:04.70 +05:41:44.5: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0971 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:04:21.15 +02:22:40.5: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:21.15 +02:22:40.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4675 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:01:18.47 +06:17:48.8: 15.15 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:18.47 +06:17:48.8: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5666 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:02:59.65 +03:03:09.7: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:02:59.65 +03:03:09.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:59.65 +03:03:09.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:06:48.56 +10:27:53.4: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:05:33.71 +07:38:30.0: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:29:40.59 +02:38:18.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:33.71 +07:38:30.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4977 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:58:46.43 +07:40:13.6: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:05:59.64 +10:13:00.6: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:03:28.54 +02:29:27.1: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:06:48.56 +10:27:53.4: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:48.56 +10:27:53.4: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5471 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:29:40.59 +02:38:18.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:05:48.73 +10:44:18.2: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:58:46.43 +07:40:13.6: 15.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:51:04.74 +07:06:51.9: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:46.43 +07:40:13.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6778 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:00:48.25 +04:10:52.8: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:06:58.52 +09:13:24.6: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:05:59.64 +10:13:00.6: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:03:28.54 +02:29:27.1: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:59.64 +10:13:00.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4485 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:28.54 +02:29:27.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6229 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:05:48.73 +10:44:18.2: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:48.73 +10:44:18.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4981 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:51:04.74 +07:06:51.9: 15.31 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:04.74 +07:06:51.9: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6191 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:00:48.25 +04:10:52.8: 15.17 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:48.25 +04:10:52.8: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5579 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:04:14.45 +04:38:49.4: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:06:58.52 +09:13:24.6: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:58.52 +09:13:24.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4806 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:05:07.44 +08:51:33.0: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:05:02.99 +09:07:56.2: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:04:15.99 +08:52:54.3: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:04:14.45 +04:38:49.4: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:14.45 +04:38:49.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5414 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:04:55.75 +08:03:46.5: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:05:07.44 +08:51:33.0: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:03:33.40 +05:21:44.4: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:07.44 +08:51:33.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5996 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:43:16.97 +04:23:22.3: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:05:02.99 +09:07:56.2: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:02.99 +09:07:56.2: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3829 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:04:15.99 +08:52:54.3: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:15.99 +08:52:54.3: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5974 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:51:35.08 +03:33:22.3: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:03:33.40 +05:21:44.4: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:04:55.75 +08:03:46.5: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:33.40 +05:21:44.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6212 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:55.75 +08:03:46.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5541 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:43:16.97 +04:23:22.3: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:16.97 +04:23:22.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8623 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:09:00.15 +11:08:04.0: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:51:35.08 +03:33:22.3: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:09:00.15 +11:08:04.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:00.15 +11:08:04.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:35.08 +03:33:22.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7248 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:09:31.08 +11:08:55.0: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:09:31.08 +11:08:55.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:31.08 +11:08:55.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:05:29.96 +06:49:59.3: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:41:58.65 +10:36:22.9: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:30:05.17 +09:49:55.6: 15.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:49:11.24 +08:02:03.7: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:04:17.76 +02:05:29.8: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:41:58.65 +10:36:22.9: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:04:21.10 +09:09:55.7: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:58.65 +10:36:22.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6372 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:05:29.96 +06:49:59.3: 15.20 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:02:16.29 +03:25:01.9: 15.64 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:29.96 +06:49:59.3: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6587 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:06:30.05 +04:02:34.7: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:49:11.24 +08:02:03.7: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:30:05.17 +09:49:55.6: 15.72 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:11.24 +08:02:03.7: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.7260 delta=-1.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:05.17 +09:49:55.6: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7200 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:04:17.76 +02:05:29.8: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:04:21.10 +09:09:55.7: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:17.76 +02:05:29.8: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7523 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:21.10 +09:09:55.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5760 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:02:16.29 +03:25:01.9: 15.08 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:16.29 +03:25:01.9: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.9310 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:06:30.05 +04:02:34.7: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:30.05 +04:02:34.7: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7787 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:07:39.13 +10:28:24.8: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:34:53.50 +01:34:03.5: 15.53 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:52:02.40 +07:58:25.7: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:03:59.62 +01:59:16.4: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:53:38.59 +02:00:33.4: 15.39 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:15:17.61 +02:19:23.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:08:37.71 +06:39:18.1: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:07:39.13 +10:28:24.8: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:39.13 +10:28:24.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7191 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:41:46.34 +08:22:49.2: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:52:02.40 +07:58:25.7: 15.16 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:34:53.50 +01:34:03.5: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:02.40 +07:58:25.7: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9244 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:53.50 +01:34:03.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8906 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:03:59.62 +01:59:16.4: 15.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:59.62 +01:59:16.4: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9433 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:53:38.59 +02:00:33.4: 15.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:38.59 +02:00:33.4: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8706 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:08:37.71 +06:39:18.1: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:15:17.61 +02:19:23.7: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:37.71 +06:39:18.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8368 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:41:46.34 +08:22:49.2: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:46.34 +08:22:49.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8821 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:07:21.10 +11:04:40.9: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:07:21.10 +11:04:40.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:21.10 +11:04:40.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:28:03.56 +04:06:33.4: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:28:03.56 +04:06:33.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:28:03.56 +04:06:33.4: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3791 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27466.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52870.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51971_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 51971_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51972_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 51972_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51975_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 51975_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51977_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 51977_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51980_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 51980_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51982_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 51982_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51986_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 51986_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51991_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 51991_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:45:30.04 +00:43:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52210_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52210_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:43.09 +00:41:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52268_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52268_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52410_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:01.52 +00:59:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52423_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52423_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:58.68 +05:25:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52424_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52424_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:11.64 +07:38:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52474_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
Preparing report for the candidate 52474_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52609_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52638_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52653_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52653_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:08:44.54 +01:33:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52692_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52708_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52708_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52810_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52827_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52827_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52838_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:06:04.12 +09:00:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52839_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:05:00.42 +11:11:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52852_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52858_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:12:28.81 +11:12:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52859_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52859_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52869_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52869_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
Preparing report for the candidate 52870_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52877_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52877_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52881_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52890_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52891_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52891_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52897_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52897_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52917_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52917_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52924_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52925_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52949_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52953_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52956_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52969_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52970_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52979_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52979_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52980_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52984_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52984_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52986_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52986_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 52995_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53007_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53018_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53020_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53026_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53043_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53048_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53048_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53050_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53050_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53051_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53051_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53060_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53070_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53070_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53091_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53093_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53093_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53102_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53111_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
Preparing report for the candidate 53111_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53135_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53135_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 53146_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27326_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 27326_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:21:51.89 +03:54:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00707_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240
The candidate 00707_fd_Vir-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0240 did not pass the final checks
