This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2756 2461172.7756 14.25 14:48:51.18 -02:45:34.0
350.99928 48.83963 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.598 Octavia 1 -1 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:51.18 -02:45:34.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:51.18 -02:45:34.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7756,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2756 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2756 2461172.7756 14.28 14:54:37.81 +01:31:53.5
357.23448 50.93154 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 1 -1 2 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:37.81 +01:31:53.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:37.81 +01:31:53.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2756* 14 54 37.81 +01 31 53.5 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7756,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2756 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2756 2461172.7756 14.34 14:34:02.92 -05:16:06.3
344.21290 49.20112 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1107 Lictoria 1 -1 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:02.92 -05:16:06.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:02.92 -05:16:06.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2756* 14 34 02.92 -05 16 06.3 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7756,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2756 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2756 2461172.7756 14.46 14:43:53.46 -01:50:19.7
350.50019 50.34936 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 1 -0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:53.46 -01:50:19.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:43:53.46 -01:50:19.7: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2756* 14 43 53.46 -01 50 19.7 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7756,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2756 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2756 2461172.7756 14.80 14:31:06.29 -02:32:02.5
345.85997 51.83174 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3002 Delasalle 1 1 1 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:31:06.29 -02:32:02.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:31:06.29 -02:32:02.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2756* 14 31 06.29 -02 32 02.5 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7756,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2756 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461172.77579440 12.05.2026 06:36:58.636 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5599
Objects passed selection criteria: 5595
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5399
Average stars matched: 5180.25 (95.9483 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 02:12:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461172.77579440 12.05.2026 06:36:58.636 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 227
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32154
Objects passed selection criteria: 32109
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31447.5
Average stars matched: 30403.2 (96.6794 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 02:15:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.77535708
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6607 high-SNR stars for plate solving
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6626 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out750579.xyls"...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out750577.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.294 -02:00:52.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6283 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky751070.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 6865 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky751076.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out750577.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out750579.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 54.6063 (5.19061e+23), 10 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.553,-2.05642), pixel scale 5.94123 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++++-+----++--+-------+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 128.032 (4.01289e+55), 20 match, 0 conflict, 15 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.557,-2.04678), pixel scale 5.95081 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-+++---++-++--+-+---+----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out750577.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out750579.solved to indicate this.
Field: out750577.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.551936, -2.051332) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:12.465, -02:03:04.796).
Field size: 15.7247 x 10.5248 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.902 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out750579.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.552965, -2.047786) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:12.712, -02:02:52.031).
Field size: 15.7247 x 10.5249 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.902 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header...
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:12 fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:12 out750577.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:12 fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:12 out750579.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out750579.xyls"...
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits (fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out750577.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out750579.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6483 degrees of RA,Dec (218.552,-2.04861)
log-odds ratio 128.032 (4.01289e+55), 20 match, 0 conflict, 15 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.557,-2.04678), pixel scale 5.95081 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-+++---++-++--+-+---+----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out750579.solved to indicate this.
Field: out750579.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.551320, -2.049746) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:12.317, -02:02:59.085).
Field size: 15.7093 x 10.5304 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.903 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Reading file "./out750577.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6483 degrees of RA,Dec (218.551,-2.05216)
log-odds ratio 54.6063 (5.19061e+23), 10 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.553,-2.05642), pixel scale 5.94123 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++++-+----++--+-------+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:12 fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:12 out750579.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits)... done!
done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out750577.solved to indicate this.
Field: out750577.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.550266, -2.053316) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:12.064, -02:03:11.937).
Field size: 15.7092 x 10.5303 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.904 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 02:12 fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 02:13 out750577.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 28105 sources.
simplexy: found 28300 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4374, 950.965] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 69.5157 (1.54985e+30), 14 match, 0 conflict, 247 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (218.552,-2.04892), pixel scale 5.95843 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------------+----------+----+--------+------------------------------+------------------------------
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4377, 950.969] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 78.5763 (1.33424e+34), 14 match, 0 conflict, 263 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (218.551,-2.05249), pixel scale 5.95846 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------------------+-----+----+--------+----+---------------------+---+--------------------------+--+
--> log-odds 69.5157
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 259.521 (5.1112e+112), 28 match, 0 conflict, 233 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.552,-2.04892), pixel scale 5.95843 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+--+-------+----------+--+-+--+-----+---+--------+-----------+-----+-------+----------------------
--> log-odds 78.5763
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 259.931 (7.6991e+112), 28 match, 0 conflict, 249 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.551,-2.05249), pixel scale 5.95846 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----+------+----+--+--+----+--+-----+--+-+-------------------+-+---+-------+------------------+--+
--> log-odds 259.521
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 492.339 (6.60774e+213), 49 match, 0 conflict, 264 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (218.552,-2.04892), pixel scale 5.95843 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++++----+----+-----+--+-+--+-----+-+-+----+---+-----------++----+------++-----++-+-------+-----
--> log-odds 259.931
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 495.759 (2.02047e+215), 49 match, 0 conflict, 232 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (218.551,-2.05249), pixel scale 5.95846 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----++++-+-++---+--+--+----+--+-+---+-++-+-----------+--+----+-+--++-------++-----+-----------+-++
--> log-odds 492.339
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 906.17 (inf), 90 match, 0 conflict, 317 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (218.552,-2.04892), pixel scale 5.95843 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++++----++++-+-----+--+-+--+++---+-+-+--++++--+--+++--+---++---++-----+++---++++-++-+----+---+-
--> log-odds 495.759
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 914.931 (inf), 90 match, 0 conflict, 341 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (218.551,-2.05249), pixel scale 5.95846 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---+-++++-+-++++-+--+--++++-+--+-+---++++-+--+-+----++++-+++--+-++-++---+-++++---+-+-----------+-++
--> log-odds 906.17
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1874.5 (inf), 191 match, 0 conflict, 288 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (218.552,-2.04892), pixel scale 5.95843 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-++-++++-++++--+++++++-+++++++++-+--++++--+--+++-+++--+++-+++++-+++++++++++++++-++---++--+-
--> log-odds 914.931
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1872.48 (inf), 190 match, 0 conflict, 409 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (218.551,-2.05249), pixel scale 5.95846 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++-++++-++-+--+++++++++-+++++++++++-+++++++++++-+++--+-+++++++++-+++++-++-+++++++-++++++++
--> log-odds 1874.5
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3425.94 (inf), 369 match, 1 conflict, 641 distractors, 374 index.
RA,Dec = (218.552,-2.04892), pixel scale 5.95843 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++-++
--> log-odds 1872.48
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3425.37 (inf), 368 match, 1 conflict, 398 distractors, 374 index.
RA,Dec = (218.551,-2.05249), pixel scale 5.95846 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3425.94
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6259.74 (inf), 724 match, 0 conflict, 863 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (218.552,-2.04892), pixel scale 5.95843 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3425.37
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6262.17 (inf), 724 match, 0 conflict, 1179 distractors, 731 index.
RA,Dec = (218.551,-2.05249), pixel scale 5.95846 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6259.74
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11456.2 (inf), 1446 match, 0 conflict, 2805 distractors, 1461 index.
RA,Dec = (218.552,-2.04892), pixel scale 5.95843 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6262.17
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11464.1 (inf), 1446 match, 0 conflict, 2646 distractors, 1462 index.
RA,Dec = (218.551,-2.05249), pixel scale 5.95846 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11456.2
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.551420, -2.049909) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:12.341, -02:02:59.672).
Field size: 15.7027 x 10.5292 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.905 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.new"...
--> log-odds 11464.1
Got 8 solutions.
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.550380, -2.053470) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:12.091, -02:03:12.494).
Field size: 15.7027 x 10.5292 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.906 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.new"...
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:12.142 -02:03:02.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
### Converted positions of 6981 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky797361.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:11.893 -02:03:15.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7000 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky798263.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:11.893 -02:03:15.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:11.893 -02:03:15.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0689 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:12.142 -02:03:02.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:12.142 -02:03:02.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0658 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:11.893 -02:03:15.48
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:12.142 -02:03:02.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00371 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UadsOMhF1N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.myU7FOZsry
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NNLxZWDe7U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SJcPETYpST
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to +3.3059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to 3.3059 deg
Loaded 4006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3333 out of 3439 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3439 out of 6283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.5 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
2.5 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UadsOMhF1N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.myU7FOZsry (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=6283
Got 6283 stars (including 5846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=261 n_q2=207 n_q3=204 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.399
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NNLxZWDe7U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=403, passed=7000
Got 7000 stars (including 6592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7000 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=268 n_q2=203 n_q3=208 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.574
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SJcPETYpST (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, passed=6981
Got 6981 stars (including 6569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6981 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=268 n_q2=199 n_q3=205 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.443
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:29.88 -00:24:08.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:39:30.27 -00:34:28.8: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:29.88 -00:24:08.9: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:29.88 -00:24:08.9: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3039 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:39:30.27 -00:34:28.8: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:30.27 -00:34:28.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2653 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20327_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 20327_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:19.06 -02:06:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 20336_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:07.26 -00:32:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20338_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 20338_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 20339_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits was not found.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits was not found.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
The guess is 573 arcmin.
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat from image00003.cat
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat from image00004.cat
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:12.142 -02:03:02.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:11.893 -02:03:15.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.294 -02:00:52.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 35582 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1385225.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
### Converted positions of 36078 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1385478.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
### Converted positions of 36035 stars ###
### Converted positions of 43198 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1386062.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1386551.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:11.893 -02:03:15.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:11.893 -02:03:15.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0689 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:12.142 -02:03:02.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:12.142 -02:03:02.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0658 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:11.893 -02:03:15.48
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:12.142 -02:03:02.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00371 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jXSd6cdznT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L4C5gbO1Wo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c3sZ57lNsn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WWHaK33ogX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.715350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.715350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to +3.3190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to 3.3190 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3249 out of 3501 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3501 out of 36035 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 142 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.5 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jXSd6cdznT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1997, passed=43174
Got 43174 stars (including 41107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=266 n_q2=181 n_q3=215 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L4C5gbO1Wo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1833, passed=36031
Got 36031 stars (including 34149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=275 n_q2=191 n_q3=213 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.c3sZ57lNsn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1950, passed=35578
Got 35578 stars (including 33587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=286 n_q2=189 n_q3=213 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.676
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WWHaK33ogX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2054, passed=36074
Got 36074 stars (including 33980 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=284 n_q2=190 n_q3=214 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.531
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0223.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_020251_TTUQ2b1x1_467060_SHovKJA4/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:15.46 -04:41:40.3: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:08.18 -05:28:44.8: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:51.06 -05:42:07.3: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:03.15 +02:02:18.8: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:15.46 -04:41:40.3: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:03.15 +02:02:18.8: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:15.46 -04:41:40.3: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3429 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:03.15 +02:02:18.8: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0879 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:08.18 -05:28:44.8: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:51.06 -05:42:07.3: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:08.18 -05:28:44.8: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5538 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:51.06 -05:42:07.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5171 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:14.75 -03:53:05.2: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:14.75 -03:53:05.2: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:14.75 -03:53:05.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8731 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:51.18 -02:45:34.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:37.81 +01:31:53.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:02.92 -05:16:06.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:51.18 -02:45:34.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:43.27 -02:20:38.3: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:29.84 -04:10:16.6: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:37.81 +01:31:53.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:09.05 -05:27:57.4: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:17.44 -05:44:26.4: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:02.92 -05:16:06.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:53.46 -01:50:19.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:43.27 -02:20:38.3: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:43.27 -02:20:38.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4092 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:29.84 -04:10:16.6: 14.80 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:29.84 -04:10:16.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5233 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:17.44 -05:44:26.4: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:09.05 -05:27:57.4: 14.97 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:21.01 -05:35:34.3: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:09.05 -05:27:57.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5214 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:17.44 -05:44:26.4: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4851 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:43:53.46 -01:50:19.7: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:04.95 -03:57:33.1: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:21.01 -05:35:34.3: 14.84 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:21.01 -05:35:34.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6015 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:43.98 -04:01:23.8: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:59.14 -04:57:08.5: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:54.30 -03:27:27.2: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:50.09 -05:02:18.7: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:04.95 -03:57:33.1: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:04.95 -03:57:33.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5331 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:43.98 -04:01:23.8: 15.09 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:43.98 -04:01:23.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6646 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:59.14 -04:57:08.5: 14.98 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:59.14 -04:57:08.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6818 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:54.30 -03:27:27.2: 14.98 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:17.91 -05:16:55.0: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:50.09 -05:02:18.7: 15.07 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:54.30 -03:27:27.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6597 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:50.09 -05:02:18.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6387 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:17.91 -05:16:55.0: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:17.91 -05:16:55.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5526 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:08.89 -04:35:17.0: 15.30 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:02.21 -03:16:22.4: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:58.33 -05:19:53.3: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:04.77 -02:06:37.8: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:32:06.55 -02:47:24.8: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:08.89 -04:35:17.0: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:08.89 -04:35:17.0: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7271 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:02.21 -03:16:22.4: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:58.33 -05:19:53.3: 15.18 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:02.21 -03:16:22.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6632 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:58.33 -05:19:53.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6571 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:04.77 -02:06:37.8: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:04.77 -02:06:37.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5448 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:13.21 +01:51:31.5: 15.41 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:32:06.55 -02:47:24.8: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:06.55 -02:47:24.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7237 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:13.21 +01:51:31.5: 15.22 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:13.21 +01:51:31.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8412 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:10.83 -02:49:17.3: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:06.16 -05:10:53.0: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:53.96 -04:17:03.4: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:12.80 -01:16:21.2: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:01.26 +00:54:05.6: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:10.83 -02:49:17.3: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:10.83 -02:49:17.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8003 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:06.16 -05:10:53.0: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:06.16 -05:10:53.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6996 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:53.96 -04:17:03.4: 15.40 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:12.80 -01:16:21.2: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:53.96 -04:17:03.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6810 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:12.80 -01:16:21.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8522 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:11.85 -00:29:51.2: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:01.26 +00:54:05.6: 15.34 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:01.26 +00:54:05.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8243 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:11.85 -00:29:51.2: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:11.85 -00:29:51.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7921 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:12.40 +01:56:00.9: 15.42 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:19.61 -03:32:28.5: 15.55 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:22.42 -02:07:53.9: 15.45 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:43.32 -05:17:29.3: 15.21 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:12.40 +01:56:00.9: 15.30 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:12.40 +01:56:00.9: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7018 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:02.49 +00:14:38.9: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:22.42 -02:07:53.9: 15.29 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:22.42 -02:07:53.9: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8269 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:19.61 -03:32:28.5: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:10.17 +00:33:38.5: 15.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.28
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:19.61 -03:32:28.5: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.28 new_mean_mag=14.8574 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:43.32 -05:17:29.3: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:43.32 -05:17:29.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7506 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:02.49 +00:14:38.9: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:02.49 +00:14:38.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7280 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:10.17 +00:33:38.5: 15.31 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:10.17 +00:33:38.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8884 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:25.67 -02:34:37.1: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:37.63 -02:49:13.3: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:14.21 -04:16:20.3: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:25.67 -02:34:37.1: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:31:06.29 -02:32:02.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:25.67 -02:34:37.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7894 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:27.35 -05:41:20.3: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:37.63 -02:49:13.3: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:53.53 -04:34:14.7: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:37.63 -02:49:13.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6355 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:14.21 -04:16:20.3: 15.30 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:14.21 -04:16:20.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7908 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:31:06.29 -02:32:02.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:27.35 -05:41:20.3: 15.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:53.53 -04:34:14.7: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:27.35 -05:41:20.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6534 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:53.53 -04:34:14.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8556 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:14.69 -01:13:15.4: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:27.52 -02:06:23.9: 15.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:40:37.80 -05:25:14.1: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:25.56 -04:07:27.1: 15.38 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:16.96 +02:09:25.2: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:14.69 -01:13:15.4: 15.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:14.69 -01:13:15.4: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9042 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:27.52 -02:06:23.9: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:27.52 -02:06:23.9: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8145 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:25.56 -04:07:27.1: 15.01 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:40:37.80 -05:25:14.1: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:25.56 -04:07:27.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.7095 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:16.96 +02:09:25.2: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:37.80 -05:25:14.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7981 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:16.96 +02:09:25.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8945 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:52.87 -05:19:26.0: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:15.56 -04:26:48.7: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:07.22 -05:57:51.3: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:59.87 -04:23:46.0: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:27.09 -04:39:13.3: 15.38 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:52.87 -05:19:26.0: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:52.87 -05:19:26.0: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8500 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:15.56 -04:26:48.7: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:15.56 -04:26:48.7: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6963 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:59.87 -04:23:46.0: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:07.22 -05:57:51.3: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:59.87 -04:23:46.0: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8284 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:07.22 -05:57:51.3: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8628 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:27.09 -04:39:13.3: 15.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:27.09 -04:39:13.3: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7667 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:54.16 -00:38:16.9: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:54.16 -00:38:16.9: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:54.16 -00:38:16.9: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8048 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:45.21 -05:49:23.1: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:05.04 -01:38:21.9: 15.58 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:52.78 +00:25:08.6: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:14.65 -06:16:24.1: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:05.04 -01:38:21.9: 15.24 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:45.21 -05:49:23.1: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:05.04 -01:38:21.9: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9719 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:45.21 -05:49:23.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7494 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:17.70 -03:46:51.9: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:52.78 +00:25:08.6: 15.17 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:52.78 +00:25:08.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8494 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:14.65 -06:16:24.1: 14.94 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:45.86 -04:53:39.6: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:14.65 -06:16:24.1: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8394 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:34.80 -01:38:13.5: 15.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:21.12 -02:12:25.6: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:17.70 -03:46:51.9: 15.11 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:17.70 -03:46:51.9: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9397 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:45.86 -04:53:39.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:51.98 -05:27:02.2: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:45.86 -04:53:39.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8491 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:34.80 -01:38:13.5: 15.45 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:34.80 -01:38:13.5: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9349 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:01.58 -03:05:27.1: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:19.10 -02:49:35.1: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:21.12 -02:12:25.6: 15.41 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:21.12 -02:12:25.6: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7560 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:39.34 -00:45:57.8: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:51.98 -05:27:02.2: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:01.58 -03:05:27.1: 15.43 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:51.98 -05:27:02.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8574 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:01.58 -03:05:27.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9627 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:19.10 -02:49:35.1: 15.43 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:19.10 -02:49:35.1: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9337 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:12.08 -00:58:47.6: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:39.34 -00:45:57.8: 15.13 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:39.34 -00:45:57.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8367 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:28.20 -00:29:37.7: 15.48 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:44.70 -05:36:55.1: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:18:07.19 -01:45:34.2: 15.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:39:15.45 -02:36:28.4: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:12.08 -00:58:47.6: 15.27 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:12.08 -00:58:47.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9785 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:28.20 -00:29:37.7: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:35.88 -05:11:32.9: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:28.20 -00:29:37.7: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9594 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:18:07.19 -01:45:34.2: 15.32 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:40.09 -06:13:14.2: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:07.19 -01:45:34.2: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8661 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:44.70 -05:36:55.1: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:44.70 -05:36:55.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7184 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:39:15.45 -02:36:28.4: 15.36 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:15.45 -02:36:28.4: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9482 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:31.02 -01:51:24.9: 15.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:35.88 -05:11:32.9: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:05.59 -05:17:15.7: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:40.09 -06:13:14.2: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:35.88 -05:11:32.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8272 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:40.09 -06:13:14.2: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8901 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:31.02 -01:51:24.9: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:47:42.27 -05:34:47.7: 15.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:31.02 -01:51:24.9: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8111 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:35:26.82 -06:10:27.5: 15.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:19.75 -05:15:59.5: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:58.90 -05:24:05.7: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:47:42.27 -05:34:47.7: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:05.59 -05:17:15.7: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:42.27 -05:34:47.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8946 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:05.59 -05:17:15.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5332 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:35:26.82 -06:10:27.5: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:26.82 -06:10:27.5: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8689 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:19.75 -05:15:59.5: 14.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:58.90 -05:24:05.7: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:19.75 -05:15:59.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8789 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:58.90 -05:24:05.7: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9550 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52566.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52607.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52400_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52401_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52401_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52402_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:42:34.51 -03:33:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52409_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52409_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:21.28 -03:07:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52410_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:51.21 -04:32:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52411_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52413_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:22:28.65 +00:49:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52414_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52417_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52417_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52428_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52429_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52432_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52432_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52434_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52439_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52439_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52442_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52446_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52450_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52450_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52453_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52460_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52483_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52488_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52488_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:52.61 -03:30:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52495_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52495_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52501_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52501_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52504_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52506_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52512_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52512_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52521_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52521_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52524_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52525_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52531_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52536_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52538_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52539_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52540_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:43:03.62 -02:22:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52545_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52547_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52547_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52548_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52550_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
Preparing report for the candidate 52552_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52553_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52559_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52560_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52561_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52562_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
Preparing report for the candidate 52566_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52569_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:15.99 -00:54:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52571_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52572_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
Preparing report for the candidate 52578_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52580_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52580_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52586_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52589_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52590_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52590_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52592_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52594_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52595_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52598_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52600_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52600_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52602_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52604_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52604_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52607_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
Preparing report for the candidate 52607_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52609_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52610_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52612_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52613_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52613_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52621_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52632_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52632_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52634_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52635_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52636_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52637_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52641_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52646_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52657_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52657_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52658_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52662_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52675_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52684_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52693_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52696_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52702_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52705_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52709_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52717_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52717_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52720_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52723_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52724_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52725_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52726_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52728_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52730_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52740_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52745_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52747_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52748_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52748_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52754_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52754_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52761_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
Preparing report for the candidate 52761_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52764_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52768_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52776_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52778_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52778_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52780_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52780_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52784_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52786_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52796_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52802_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52804_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52806_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52808_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52812_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52816_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52818_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52820_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:40.74 -01:17:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52822_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52828_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52830_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52836_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52839_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52846_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52846_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52847_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52848_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52855_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52857_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52863_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52865_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52867_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52867_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52878_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:03.08 -02:57:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52881_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52884_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52886_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52886_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52887_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52887_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52888_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52892_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52895_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52896_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52897_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52897_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52898_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52926_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52926_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52929_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52945_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52947_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224
The candidate 52949_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-36-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0224 did not pass the final checks
