######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0 FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-11-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 486292 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 486292 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
renamed 'UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 430.8737 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 466.9058 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 900.3165 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 443.6088 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 905.0264 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 449.2902 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.08951 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.013 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.9300003051758 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-12T01:23:20.1756478' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-12T06:23:20.1756478' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61172.266205729 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-12T06:23:30.0783744' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61172.2663203473 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999946090197 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 46.0002646305618 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 54.8469444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.374444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.22241604969599 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20409 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20409 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.9300003051758 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.9300003051758 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 5.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.38 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits :) Spent 0.893540 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 42267.109959 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27349.0, right_median=33499.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-12T01:26:55.7281112' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-12T06:26:55.7281112' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61172.2687005554 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-12T06:27:05.6288915' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61172.2688151388 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.99994631353 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 46.0002644819721 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 54.22 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.296944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.23195697611511 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20390 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20390 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 5.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.38 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits :) Spent 0.992253 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 42267.109959 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27349.0, right_median=33499.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.76632147 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits was not set. Trying to guess... It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits .... Determining astrometry method... No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits .... Determining astrometry method... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits was not set. Trying to guess... FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 570 arcmin. /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5711 high-SNR stars for plate solving The guess is 570 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5857 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2839275.xyls"... This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ Generating wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat from image00002.cat ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code Generating wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat from image00001.cat IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2839277.xyls"... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits created. Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.819 +45:59:52.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6666 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 6678 stars ### '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2839711.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2839713.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2839275.axy"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Reading file "./out2839277.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 41.6409 (1.2145e+18), 11 match, 1 conflict, 45 distractors, 46 index. RA,Dec = (179.978,46.0152), pixel scale 5.92273 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+--------+-----+-----+--+-c+--+--+--------------+--+(best)--------------------------------+---------- log-odds ratio 60.7898 (2.51584e+26), 12 match, 0 conflict, 36 distractors, 46 index. RA,Dec = (179.988,46.0083), pixel scale 5.9271 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+-++-----+-----+-----+--+--+--+--+--------+(best)-----------------------+-----------+-----+-----+---- Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2839275.solved to indicate this. Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2839277.solved to indicate this. Field: out2839275.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.002340, 46.006833) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:00.561, +46:00:24.598). Field size: 15.7314 x 10.5307 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.985 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Field: out2839277.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.007919, 46.003813) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:01.900, +46:00:13.727). Field size: 15.727 x 10.5278 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.994 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' -> 'fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 01:51 fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 01:51 out2839275.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits)... done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 01:51 fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 01:51 out2839277.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits)... done! done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits (fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2839277.xyls"... Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2839275.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2839275.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.6683 degrees of RA,Dec (180.001,46.006) log-odds ratio 23.9954 (2.63671e+10), 6 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (179.986,46.0144), pixel scale 5.94791 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------++----+---+-----+-+(best)-------------------------------------------------------+------------------ Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2839277.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.6633 degrees of RA,Dec (180.007,46.003) log-odds ratio 22.3309 (4.99097e+09), 6 match, 0 conflict, 20 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (179.992,46.0115), pixel scale 5.94627 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+--+---+-+---+---+(best)-----------------------------------------+-------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2839275.solved to indicate this. Field: out2839275.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.003697, 46.008034) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:00.887, +46:00:28.922). Field size: 15.7208 x 10.5283 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.973 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2839277.solved to indicate this. Field: out2839277.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.009288, 46.005042) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:02.229, +46:00:18.151). Field size: 15.7161 x 10.5261 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.965 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 01:51 fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 01:51 out2839275.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits)... done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 01:51 fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 01:51 out2839277.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits)... done! done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 21424 sources. simplexy: found 22278 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4379, 950.973] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 7.88325 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 131.488 (1.27206e+57), 20 match, 0 conflict, 237 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (180.01,46.0059), pixel scale 5.95848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++------------------------------------+--+-----+--------------++--+------+---------+---+-------- Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4549, 951.227] arcmin --> log-odds 131.488 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 343.829 (2.10404e+149), 42 match, 0 conflict, 215 distractors, 46 index. RA,Dec = (180.01,46.0059), pixel scale 5.95848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++++-----+-+----++--+-----++------+----+--+----++----+---------++--+------++---+----+---++------- Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 11.0235 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 147.566 (1.22185e+64), 20 match, 0 conflict, 249 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (180.005,46.0089), pixel scale 5.96007 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+----------------+--+-------+--------------------+------------+---------------+----------++---- --> log-odds 343.829 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 733.783 (inf), 84 match, 0 conflict, 270 distractors, 88 index. RA,Dec = (180.01,46.0059), pixel scale 5.95848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++-+-++-+-----+--+-----++---+--+-+-+++-+-++-++----+---------+++-++--++-++-+-+----++-+++-++--++ --> log-odds 147.566 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 349.624 (6.91382e+151), 42 match, 0 conflict, 227 distractors, 46 index. RA,Dec = (180.005,46.0089), pixel scale 5.96007 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+------+----++--+++-++--++--+---------+-+---++---+------------+--+------------+----+---+-++++-- --> log-odds 733.783 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1362.54 (inf), 163 match, 0 conflict, 429 distractors, 176 index. RA,Dec = (180.01,46.0059), pixel scale 5.95848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++++-+-++-++-++++++++---++++--++++-+-+++-++++-+++---+--+-++-+-++++++--+++++-+-++-+-++++++-++--++ --> log-odds 349.624 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 739.571 (inf), 84 match, 0 conflict, 238 distractors, 88 index. RA,Dec = (180.005,46.0089), pixel scale 5.96007 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++--+-+-+--+-----++-+++-+++-++--+-+---+-+-+-+-+-++---+------+---+++--++++--------++-+--+---+-++++-+ --> log-odds 1362.54 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2611.08 (inf), 327 match, 0 conflict, 496 distractors, 363 index. RA,Dec = (180.01,46.0059), pixel scale 5.95848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++++-+++++--++++++-++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++++++++++++-++ --> log-odds 739.571 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1365.28 (inf), 163 match, 0 conflict, 349 distractors, 176 index. RA,Dec = (180.005,46.0089), pixel scale 5.96007 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-++++-++++-++++++-+++-+++-+++-+++++-+-+++++++++++-+++-+-+-+-+++++++++++-+----++++++--+-+-+-++++-+ --> log-odds 2611.08 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4690.34 (inf), 634 match, 0 conflict, 798 distractors, 715 index. RA,Dec = (180.01,46.0059), pixel scale 5.95848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++++-+++++--++++++-++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++++++++++++-++ --> log-odds 1365.28 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2566.93 (inf), 325 match, 0 conflict, 667 distractors, 363 index. RA,Dec = (180.005,46.0089), pixel scale 5.96007 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+-+++++-+++++++++++-+++-+++++--++++++++++++ --> log-odds 4690.34 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8332.89 (inf), 1236 match, 0 conflict, 1834 distractors, 1446 index. RA,Dec = (180.01,46.0059), pixel scale 5.95848 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++++-+++++--++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++-+-+++++++-+++++++-++ --> log-odds 2566.93 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4598.95 (inf), 621 match, 0 conflict, 714 distractors, 715 index. RA,Dec = (180.005,46.0089), pixel scale 5.96007 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+-+++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++-++++++++++++ --> log-odds 8332.89 --> log-odds 4598.95 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Got 7 solutions. Verifying WCS of field 1. Field: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.007946, 46.005106) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:01.907, +46:00:18.380). Field size: 15.7045 x 10.5281 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.995 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.new"... log-odds ratio 8149.62 (inf), 1225 match, 0 conflict, 2182 distractors, 1448 index. RA,Dec = (180.005,46.0089), pixel scale 5.96007 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-+++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++---+++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++-++++++++++++ renamed 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat from image00004.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits --> log-odds 8149.62 Got 7 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.002218, 46.007989) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:00.532, +46:00:28.760). Field size: 15.7087 x 10.531 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -179.985 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.new"... Image size: 937.0'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:01.621 +46:00:15.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6127 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2849006.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits renamed 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:00.246 +46:00:25.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 5955 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2849128.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:00.246 +46:00:25.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.246 +46:00:25.78 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Image size: 937.0'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:01.621 +46:00:15.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.621 +46:00:15.40 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0086 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.246 +46:00:25.78 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:01.621 +46:00:15.40 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00491 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xmQwC1xR7l Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fQfLiYW2rJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0p1NoOURKO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EdsAQDnryU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2476 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2476 deg Loaded 3765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2801 out of 2905 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6666 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.954000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.954000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2476 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9173 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2476 deg Loaded 3765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2801 out of 2905 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6666 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 6678 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9174 to 192.3674 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2477 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9174 to 192.3674 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2477 deg Loaded 3764 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2798 out of 2905 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 6678 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 15.4 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.xmQwC1xR7l (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=6666 Got 6666 stars (including 6308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6622 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=258 n_q2=245 n_q3=248 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.fQfLiYW2rJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, passed=6678 Got 6678 stars (including 6317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6678 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6639 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=252 n_q2=249 n_q3=249 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0p1NoOURKO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, passed=5955 Got 5955 stars (including 5652 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5955 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5925 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=213 n_q2=270 n_q3=223 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.EdsAQDnryU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=321, passed=6127 Got 6127 stars (including 5802 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6127 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6086 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6085 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6085 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.575 n_q1=222 n_q2=261 n_q3=231 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.372 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21056_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 21056_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 11:37:32.90 +44:41:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits was not set. Trying to guess... It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. The guess is 605 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits was not found. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits was not found. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits was not set. Trying to guess... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 570 arcmin. The guess is 570 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits was not found. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat from image00003.cat Generating wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat from image00004.cat Generating wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat from image00001.cat Generating wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat from image00002.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits created. verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Image size: 937.0'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:01.621 +46:00:15.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.819 +45:59:52.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:00.246 +46:00:25.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 27785 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 26363 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2873192.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2873188.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits ### Converted positions of 29946 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2873249.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits ### Converted positions of 30011 stars ### 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2873233.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:00.246 +46:00:25.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.246 +46:00:25.78 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Image size: 937.0'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:01.621 +46:00:15.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.794 +45:59:50.79 Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.621 +46:00:15.40 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0086 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.246 +46:00:25.78 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:01.621 +46:00:15.40 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00491 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fJsrJkJ5Ky Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nDjasibDTm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7LFL8qtMvy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits &> /tmp/tmp.neUSg3NC3T Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 29946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2778 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2778 deg Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2686 out of 2907 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2907 out of 29946 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65 Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 12.31 11:37:32.93 +44:41:53.4 7206 3902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 29946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2778 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8345 to 192.4258 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2778 deg Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2686 out of 2907 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2907 out of 29946 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=5.2) Read 30011 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8350 to 192.4261 deg, Dec +40.1391 to +51.2775 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8350 to 192.4261 deg, Dec 40.1391 to 51.2775 deg Loaded 3792 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2687 out of 2905 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2905 out of 30011 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.2 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 2.3 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 15.5 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 15.4 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.fJsrJkJ5Ky (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1201, passed=29932 Got 29932 stars (including 28685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29932 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29774 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29773 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29773 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=260 n_q2=250 n_q3=238 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nDjasibDTm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1184, passed=29997 Got 29997 stars (including 28770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29997 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29830 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29829 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29829 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=259 n_q2=256 n_q3=236 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.7LFL8qtMvy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1105, passed=27767 Got 27767 stars (including 26633 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27767 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27520 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27520 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=208 n_q2=268 n_q3=219 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.neUSg3NC3T (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1500, passed=26354 Got 26354 stars (including 24822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26354 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=237 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:00:44.05 +48:36:14.3: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:03:44.67 +45:48:40.9: 13.68 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:00:44.05 +48:36:14.3: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 12:03:44.67 +45:48:40.9: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:44.05 +48:36:14.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6675 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:44.67 +45:48:40.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9002 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31892_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 31892_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checksRejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32264_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 32264_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 10.84 11:39:30.69 +47:31:07.1 6885 2210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32444_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 32444_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 11.90 11:36:46.47 +48:34:56.0 7119 1546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32531_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 32531_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 12.29 12:14:01.60 +46:24:03.1 3330 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32558_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 32558_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 12.42 12:05:57.85 +48:45:35.6 4197 1522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32577_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 32577_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 12.45 12:00:10.15 +46:10:05.2 4774 3096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32722_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 32722_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 12.45 12:08:07.28 +42:29:09.9 3885 5314 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32851_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 32851_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 12.67 11:47:09.43 +45:32:20.4 6151 3449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32865_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 32865_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 13.00 12:03:47.89 +48:45:21.0 4413 1528 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33110_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 33110_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 12.90 12:16:06.24 +46:23:49.1 3113 2915 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33744_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 33744_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 13.09 12:21:44.11 +46:24:17.7 2525 2875 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 12.26632 2461172.76632 13.66 12:00:44.05 +48:36:14.7 4716 1624 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33770_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 33770_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 13.68 12:00:44.05 +48:36:13.9 4718 1622 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33805_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 33805_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 13.79 11:35:19.17 +45:44:20.1 7398 3255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33818_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 33818_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 13.72 12:17:52.10 +41:58:07.1 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34132_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34132_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 13.90 11:50:33.34 +49:53:39.8 5714 0824 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 12.26632 2461172.76632 13.87 12:03:44.71 +45:48:41.0 4395 3311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-23-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34306_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34306_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 13.94 12:03:44.62 +45:48:40.7 4398 3309 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits **** FOUND 11:36:31.24 +49:24:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34518_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34518_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.10 11:36:31.22 +49:24:29.8 7108 1043 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34603_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34603_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.11 12:23:54.67 +43:34:36.8 2168 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34604_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34604_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.31 12:02:54.85 +42:02:33.0 4464 5593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34637_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34637_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.14 11:44:48.89 +44:45:13.2 6422 3913 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34725_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34725_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.24 11:53:48.47 +43:34:52.5 5470 4654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34796_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34796_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.46 12:09:47.34 +42:20:35.9 3696 5396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34853_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34853_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.46 11:40:45.13 +42:18:22.8 6950 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34911_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34911_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.54 11:37:37.54 +49:12:57.0 7007 1168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34940_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 34940_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.47 12:24:20.67 +47:47:36.7 2316 2015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35070_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35070_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.04 12:15:08.38 +43:48:21.3 3139 4487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35111_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35111_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.49 11:38:10.88 +49:31:49.3 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35134_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35134_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.43 11:39:25.48 +46:18:26.7 6941 2942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35177_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35177_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.46 11:42:00.83 +49:48:14.6 6552 0840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35293_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35293_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.41 12:24:01.34 +45:21:39.3 2238 3489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits **** FOUND 11:40:24.31 +49:49:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35401_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35401_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.56 11:40:24.30 +49:49:53.6 6709 0813 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35529_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35529_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.75 12:22:56.99 +42:50:15.5 2241 5026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35622_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35622_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.75 11:47:43.01 +44:17:15.3 6121 4208 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35627_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35627_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.57 12:14:55.01 +49:42:35.8 3330 0914 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35722_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35722_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.40 12:21:57.24 +44:45:07.1 2433 3873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35737_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35737_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.75 11:44:38.79 +46:13:46.5 6397 3020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35751_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35751_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.70 11:36:42.35 +43:24:52.2 7355 4673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35857_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35857_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.34 12:10:05.63 +41:50:31.5 3652 5700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35962_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 35962_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.95 12:27:29.39 +48:57:10.3 2055 1285 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36004_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 36004_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.84 11:59:26.90 +46:32:43.5 4849 2868 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36219_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 36219_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.76 12:08:52.44 +46:33:55.3 3870 2843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36283_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 36283_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.93 11:41:46.52 +43:29:38.8 6793 4659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits **** FOUND 11:45:59.53 +43:38:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36373_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 The candidate 36373_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.70 11:45:59.45 +43:38:41.5 6325 4590 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461172.76632147 -observatory V36 03:03:58.08 +17:02:39.7 Mercury (-2.0mag) 05:22:37.93 +24:31:16.7 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:32:18.23 +08:46:46.6 Mars (1.2mag) 07:27:48.68 +22:18:17.2 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:40:13.24 +01:56:15.1 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:53:41.46 +20:06:11.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:13:56.57 +00:03:51.9 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:13.66 -22:56:16.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 23:22:26.41 -03:27:15.7 Moon (-9.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 12 01:51 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461172.76632147: 07:27:42.44 +22:18:33.1 Io (5.9mag) 07:27:55.01 +22:17:59.3 Europa (6.1mag) 07:27:47.73 +22:18:25.8 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:27:19.29 +22:19:31.0 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:29:44.65 +21:56:43.4 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:27:52.70 +22:18:05.7 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:30:12.64 +22:23:21.1 Elara (17.4mag) 07:28:25.83 +22:44:29.0 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:35:25.36 +22:18:16.3 Carme (18.7mag) 00:40:23.22 +01:56:01.8 Titan (8.7mag) 00:40:09.92 +01:56:28.5 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:40:03.44 +01:54:21.6 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:40:03.87 +01:56:38.6 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:41:26.02 +02:01:54.4 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 12 01:51 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461172.76632147: 16:59:45.67 -29:34:26.3 JWST 21:56:44.67 -32:08:02.8 Chandra 08:30:01.71 -46:49:41.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 12 01:51 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461172.76632147 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 07:48:48.34 +25:18:51.7 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:55:21.39 -30:34:08.5 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:28:03.94 -68:37:36.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:39:38.79 +31:39:30.6 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:24:45.62 +13:22:58.5 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:38.42 +30:24:04.6 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:00:50.44 +26:38:43.1 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:13:04.01 +31:49:20.3 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:38:09.24 +02:15:10.4 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:43:58.33 +20:29:02.2 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:30:23.27 -11:09:33.2 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:00:16.58 -08:11:28.1 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:12:58.05 +64:39:43.2 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:44:55.63 -04:36:48.6 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 15:51:11.35 +88:04:44.7 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:37:51.95 +63:39:02.8 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:03:33.55 +24:31:03.2 12.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:59:31.40 +10:26:20.2 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:23:13.73 +22:53:41.7 14.3mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:51:11.13 -18:46:52.0 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:40:29.87 +39:28:32.0 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:09:51.46 +53:12:17.0 16.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 05:40:44.72 -08:03:34.2 10.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:44:11.27 +04:16:49.0 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 05:28:38.10 +01:20:42.1 17.9mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 01:06:33.57 +40:59:58.3 15.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:33:29.83 -08:23:33.1 10.3mag 10P/Tempel 14:28:13.86 -00:20:23.2 16.4mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:01.34 -00:56:05.8 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:43:26.82 -02:43:16.7 17.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:29:39.60 +21:45:32.6 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:02:55.37 +30:57:17.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:00:20.18 -08:34:25.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:18:24.18 +28:53:25.8 16.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:05:12.55 +13:07:20.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:16:36.93 -01:48:42.3 15.0mag 88P/Howell 03:28:44.73 +26:42:03.5 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:48:38.77 +33:15:22.1 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:05:19.53 +26:25:04.0 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos 03:14:53.45 +17:04:37.2 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:39:41.50 +17:16:01.7 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 03:47:45.44 +19:12:56.2 11.5mag 141P/Machholz 03:51:54.90 +13:33:19.8 11.4mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:32:20.09 +09:47:57.7 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:37:39.64 -29:03:53.2 17.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:17:36.62 +11:39:16.0 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:11:47.76 -10:45:15.1 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 06:33:11.62 +35:52:20.7 17.2mag 240P/NEAT 07:55:01.72 -02:50:46.2 18.0mag 242P/Spahr 23:23:00.07 -12:54:18.3 17.1mag 260P/McNaught 02:55:52.85 +26:50:36.3 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR 15:29:31.22 +08:13:46.0 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:47:45.24 +21:15:05.3 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:16:17.86 +43:28:26.4 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K May 12 01:51 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 12 01:51 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 12 01:51 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 13:42:37.932 +03:25:31.87 AT 2026lnp 2026-05-07.23 19.3378 13:05:48.294 -23:51:09.88 AT 2026lno 2026-05-07.23 19.2731 13:28:10.220 -24:58:07.02 AT 2026lnn 2026-05-07.23 19.1862 13:01:10.346 -26:29:29.03 AT 2026lnm 2026-05-07.21 19.8458 13:06:44.896 +73:12:18.55 AT 2026lnl 2026-05-07.22 18.8585 16:53:20.972 +24:45:10.02 AT 2026lnk 2026-04-29.39 20.1096 15:20:12.330 +05:17:27.37 AT 2026lnj 2026-04-23.40 20.1549 17:43:07.678 +22:57:21.39 AT 2026lni 2026-04-23.41 20.7995 16:52:47.004 +68:05:03.93 AT 2026lnh 2026-05-06.48 18.813 11:50:05.757 +07:28:43.49 AT 2026lng 2026-05-07.19 19.3993 10:13:11.650 +10:44:10.92 AT 2026lnf 2026-05-07.20 19.5524 13:47:31.946 -04:25:18.73 AT 2026lne 2026-04-28.36 19.7647 14:21:34.611 +52:09:51.86 AT 2026lnd 2026-04-28.38 20.0861 13:52:20.676 +51:56:47.09 AT 2026lnc 2026-05-07.24 19.4231 14:12:02.479 +08:55:50.34 AT 2026lnb 2026-04-15.42 20.4511 14:54:28.469 -01:36:18.19 AT 2026lna 2026-04-23.34 20.2666 16:46:01.930 +52:07:14.56 AT 2026lmz 2026-04-28.46 20.4175 12:23:24.705 +07:03:02.11 AT 2026lmy 2026-05-02.22 19.5671 12:33:27.343 +05:00:27.57 AT 2026lmx 2026-04-20.31 20.5263 13:07:35.674 +15:13:24.73 SN 2026lmw 2026-05-02.25 19.2447 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 12 01:51 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 05 12.26882 2461172.76882 14.95 12:16:53.49 +49:49:45.3 3140 0831 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_013809_TTUQ2b1x1_1721045_viPDO39V/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_01-26-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
