NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Vir-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    10.46    11:38:03.93 +02:09:41.9   8271 0881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    10.46    11:38:03.97 +02:09:41.8   8272 0886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.2226  2461172.7226  10.46  11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8
264.68335  59.47020 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
20 Massalia                -1      0       1  10.5     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8:  15.62 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8:  15.71 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    12.80    12:05:41.34 -01:37:19.2   3957 2907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    12.75    12:05:41.36 -01:37:17.9   3957 2912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.2226  2461172.7226  12.78  12:05:41.35 -01:37:18.5
280.14952  59.21127 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
204 Kallisto                -0      0       0  12.8    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:41.35 -01:37:18.5:  16.08 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:41.35 -01:37:18.5:  16.11 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    12.92    11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.8   5906 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    12.91    11:53:27.25 +01:17:41.5   5907 1272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.2226  2461172.7226  12.91  11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.6
272.21875  60.66149 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
122 Gerda                   -0      1       1  13.0     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.6:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.6:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    13.34    12:21:49.05 +02:01:39.2   1652 0547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    13.34    12:21:48.99 +02:01:40.6   1651 0552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.2226  2461172.7226  13.34  12:21:49.02 +02:01:39.9
285.89774  63.91552 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
238 Hypatia                  0      0       0  13.2    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:21:49.02 +02:01:39.9:  15.78 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:21:49.02 +02:01:39.9:  15.81 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    13.38    12:16:43.32 -03:04:16.0   2242 3678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    13.28    12:16:43.31 -03:04:15.9   2242 3684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.2226  2461172.7226  13.33  12:16:43.32 -03:04:15.9
286.09100  58.66092 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
184 Dejopeja                 0      1       1  13.3     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:16:43.32 -03:04:15.9:  15.92 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:16:43.32 -03:04:15.9:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    14.25    11:55:03.61 -01:44:23.1   5547 3078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    14.22    11:55:03.54 -01:44:22.6   5548 3083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.2226  2461172.7226  14.23  11:55:03.58 -01:44:22.8
275.50618  58.09812 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
109 Felicitas               -0      1       1  14.1    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:55:03.58 -01:44:22.8:  16.09 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:55:03.58 -01:44:22.8:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    14.39    11:38:28.64 -05:01:43.2   7919 5227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    14.40    11:38:28.79 -05:01:44.2   7920 5233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.2226  2461172.7226  14.39  11:38:28.71 -05:01:43.7
271.46312  53.32599 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
193 Ambrosia                 1     -0       1  14.5    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:38:28.71 -05:01:43.7:  15.74 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:38:28.71 -05:01:43.7:  15.84 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    14.59    11:59:41.10 -01:49:51.4   4850 3089   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    14.43    11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.8   4850 3095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 12.2226  2461172.7226  14.51  11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1
277.59419  58.47143 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
766 Moguntia                 2     -1       2  15.1    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1:  15.65 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1:  16.15 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.65 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 8

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Vir-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Vir-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Vir-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 524084 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 524084 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.png' -> 'transient_report/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits_preview.png'
Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits

renamed 'Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.png' -> 'transient_report/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits_preview.png'
Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 692.5938 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 482.5319 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1147.8260 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 486.6589 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1149.3675 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 494.0102 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.65729 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.015 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-12T00:18:42.5954600' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-12T05:18:42.5954600' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61172.2213263311 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-12T05:18:52.4980552' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61172.221440949 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999202092487 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.9999105546192 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.7619444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 221.3425 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.39447080399685 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Vir-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 5.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 43.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 13.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.300664 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/d_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits :) Spent 0.817344 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/d_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-12T00:22:00.0902966' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-12T05:22:00.0902966' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61172.223612153 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-12T05:22:09.9986797' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61172.2237268286 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999202223273 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99991060640521 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.3033333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 222.323333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40543105028218 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Vir-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29394 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29394 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 5.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 43.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 13.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.300664 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/d_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits :) Spent 0.652869 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/d_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37850.569222 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24504.0, right_median=28262.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-22_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits


fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.72144207 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits was not set. Trying to guess... No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits .... Determining astrometry method... The guess is 573 arcmin. Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 4996 high-SNR stars for plate solving It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits was not set. Trying to guess... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5322 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ The guess is 573 arcmin. ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out104377.xyls"... This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out104375.xyls"... Generating wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat from image00002.cat Generating wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat from image00001.cat Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 5784 stars ### ### Converted positions of 5852 stars ### 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky104810.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky104842.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out104375.axy"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 77.5895 (4.97395e+33), 9 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.01056), pixel scale 5.97937 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+---+--+-+-+-+---+--+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reading file "./out104377.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out104375.solved to indicate this. Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 78.4457 (1.171e+34), 9 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (180.016,-2.00099), pixel scale 5.97666 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-+----+-+-+-+-++-+(best)----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Field: out104375.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.011125, -2.012320) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:02.670, -02:00:44.351). Field size: 15.7913 x 10.5772 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.395 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out104377.solved to indicate this. Field: out104377.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.012314, -2.003039) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:02.955, -02:00:10.942). Field size: 15.7847 x 10.5731 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.395 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 00:26 fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 00:26 out104375.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits)... done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 00:26 fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 00:26 out104377.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits)... done! done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out104375.xyls"... Reading input file 1 of 1: "out104377.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out104375.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7267 degrees of RA,Dec (180.01,-2.0131) log-odds ratio 77.5895 (4.97395e+33), 9 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.01056), pixel scale 5.97937 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+---+--+-+-+-+---+--+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reading file "./out104377.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.7217 degrees of RA,Dec (180.011,-2.00382) log-odds ratio 78.4457 (1.171e+34), 9 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (180.016,-2.00099), pixel scale 5.97666 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-+----+-+-+-+-++-+(best)----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out104375.solved to indicate this. Field: out104375.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.012456, -2.012956) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:02.989, -02:00:46.642). Field size: 15.7751 x 10.5843 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.42 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out104377.solved to indicate this. Field: out104377.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.013666, -2.003757) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:03.280, -02:00:13.524). Field size: 15.7679 x 10.5796 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.422 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 00:26 fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 00:26 out104375.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits)... done! WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 12 00:26 fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 12 00:26 out104377.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits)... done! done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 20593 sources. simplexy: found 25377 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7134, 955.103] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 42.8084 (3.9036e+18), 9 match, 0 conflict, 126 distractors, 9 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.00298), pixel scale 5.98435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+-----------------------------+----+--------+-+---------------+-----------+------------------ fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (9 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (8 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) --> log-odds 42.8084 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 163.745 (1.29939e+71), 20 match, 0 conflict, 238 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.00298), pixel scale 5.98435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+--+--+----------+------------+---++--------+-+---------------+-----------+-+---------------- --> log-odds 163.745 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 443.514 (4.12623e+192), 46 match, 0 conflict, 212 distractors, 47 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.00298), pixel scale 5.98435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+-+--+--+-----+----+-------+-++-+--+++------+-+-+------+---+----+--------+--+-+++----+++---+--- --> log-odds 443.514 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 911.781 (inf), 92 match, 0 conflict, 166 distractors, 93 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.00298), pixel scale 5.98435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-++-+++-+++++--++-+----+++++-++-+++++----+-++++---+-+---+++--+--+-++--+--+-+++++--+++--+++-+ --> log-odds 911.781 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1833.97 (inf), 199 match, 0 conflict, 154 distractors, 201 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.00298), pixel scale 5.98435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++-+++-+++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++ Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7344, 955.417] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. --> log-odds 7.91558 Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 92.3887 (1.33022e+40), 20 match, 0 conflict, 557 distractors, 20 index. RA,Dec = (180.013,-2.01218), pixel scale 5.98632 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+---------------------+--+-+---------------+------------------+------------------------------ --> log-odds 1833.97 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3152.82 (inf), 368 match, 1 conflict, 334 distractors, 371 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.00298), pixel scale 5.98435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 92.3887 Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 375.928 (1.83336e+163), 46 match, 0 conflict, 531 distractors, 47 index. RA,Dec = (180.013,-2.01218), pixel scale 5.98632 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--++-+-----------------++--+-++--------------++----+------+-----+-----------++-----+----------- --> log-odds 3152.82 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5836.89 (inf), 737 match, 0 conflict, 691 distractors, 745 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.00298), pixel scale 5.98435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 375.928 Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 831.93 (inf), 92 match, 1 conflict, 484 distractors, 93 index. RA,Dec = (180.013,-2.01218), pixel scale 5.98632 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--++++--+----+----+++--+++-+-++---+--+-------++---++------+--+--+--------+--++-----+-++--+-+--- --> log-odds 831.93 Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1783.2 (inf), 200 match, 0 conflict, 377 distractors, 202 index. RA,Dec = (180.013,-2.01218), pixel scale 5.98632 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++++++++++-+++---++++++++-+++++--++++--+++++++---++--+--++--+++++++-+---+++++-+-+++-++--+++--- --> log-odds 5836.89 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 10587.8 (inf), 1454 match, 0 conflict, 2312 distractors, 1475 index. RA,Dec = (180.015,-2.00298), pixel scale 5.98435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 1783.2 Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3119.5 (inf), 369 match, 1 conflict, 409 distractors, 372 index. RA,Dec = (180.013,-2.01218), pixel scale 5.98632 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++--++-++++++++++++-+++++++++++-++++++++++ --> log-odds 10587.8 Got 8 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.013542, -2.003363) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:03.250, -02:00:12.107). Field size: 15.7665 x 10.5715 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.403 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.new"... --> log-odds 3119.5 Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5775.31 (inf), 737 match, 1 conflict, 1187 distractors, 745 index. RA,Dec = (180.013,-2.01218), pixel scale 5.98632 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++ renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits --> log-odds 5775.31 Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Generating wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat from image00004.cat Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 10486.1 (inf), 1456 match, 0 conflict, 2218 distractors, 1476 index. RA,Dec = (180.013,-2.01218), pixel scale 5.98632 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++ Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.038 -02:00:14.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6270 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky107324.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits --> log-odds 10486.1 Got 7 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (180.012357, -2.013012) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (12:00:02.966, -02:00:46.842). Field size: 15.7722 x 10.5757 degrees Field rotation angle: up is -176.404 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Generating wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.754 -02:00:49.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 5423 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky107500.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.754 -02:00:49.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.754 -02:00:49.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.038 -02:00:14.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 Second-epoch image center 12:00:03.038 -02:00:14.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0140 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.754 -02:00:49.64 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:03.038 -02:00:14.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00972 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iSmAYqJ06Z Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6TI7GFDHjn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TnMcTHhQQI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sGh6eTJY6t Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to +3.3108 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to 3.3108 deg Loaded 3755 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3122 out of 3271 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3271 out of 5852 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to +3.3108 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to 3.3108 deg Loaded 3755 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3122 out of 3271 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3271 out of 5852 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 5784 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.8081 to 188.1615 deg, Dec -7.7215 to +3.7639 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.8081 to 188.1615 deg, Dec -7.7215 to 3.7639 deg Loaded 4166 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3130 out of 3252 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3252 out of 5784 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 2.2 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 4.3 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.iSmAYqJ06Z (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, passed=5852 Got 5852 stars (including 5404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5820 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5820 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=243 n_q2=233 n_q3=258 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203 The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.6TI7GFDHjn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, passed=5784 Got 5784 stars (including 5364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5784 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5726 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=248 n_q2=214 n_q3=265 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.TnMcTHhQQI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=376, passed=5423 Got 5423 stars (including 5032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5423 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=252 n_q2=213 n_q3=270 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.sGh6eTJY6t (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=255, passed=6270 Got 6270 stars (including 6008 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6270 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6224 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6224 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6224 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=262 n_q2=210 n_q3=265 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:28:37.87 -00:34:48.4: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:08:03.12 -02:24:04.9: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:08:03.12 -02:24:04.9: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:08:03.12 -02:24:04.9: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2125 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:28:37.87 -00:34:48.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:37.87 -00:34:48.4: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1720 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20530.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 20528_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    12.21    12:28:37.93 -00:34:48.2   0519 2063   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    12.12    12:28:37.82 -00:34:48.6   0518 2068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 20530_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20536_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 20536_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    12.21    12:08:03.11 -02:24:04.8   3573 3353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    12.21    12:08:03.12 -02:24:05.0   3573 3359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Entering WCS image calibration mode. Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits was not found. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits was not set. Trying to guess... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 573 arcmin. The guess is 573 arcmin. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits was not found. WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Generating wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat from image00004.cat Generating wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat from image00003.cat Generating wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat from image00001.cat Generating wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat from image00002.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits created. verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.038 -02:00:14.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.754 -02:00:49.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 24727 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 32492 stars ### '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky370429.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky370501.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits ### Converted positions of 33433 stars ### 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' ### Converted positions of 32552 stars ### '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky370524.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky370483.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.754 -02:00:49.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.754 -02:00:49.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.038 -02:00:14.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 Second-epoch image center 12:00:03.038 -02:00:14.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0140 deg. ################################### ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A ref2=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new1=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A new2=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A) ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.754 -02:00:49.64 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:03.038 -02:00:14.91 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00972 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o4miB0iq5p Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kb0glLrkyo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5AvFZSDI11 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YjYlf4sAUR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to +3.3170 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to 3.3170 deg Loaded 3770 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3039 out of 3314 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 32492 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.767000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.767000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to +3.3170 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to 3.3170 deg Loaded 3770 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3039 out of 3314 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 32492 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 33433 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.7993 to 188.2138 deg, Dec -7.7228 to +3.7639 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.7993 to 188.2138 deg, Dec -7.7228 to 3.7639 deg Loaded 4179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3062 out of 3307 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3307 out of 33433 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 2.0 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 3.8 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 15.4 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.o4miB0iq5p (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1375, passed=32477 Got 32477 stars (including 31049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32477 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=240 n_q2=231 n_q3=264 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Kb0glLrkyo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1372, passed=33420 Got 33420 stars (including 32000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33420 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=242 n_q2=213 n_q3=270 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074 The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.5AvFZSDI11 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1178, passed=32530 Got 32530 stars (including 31286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32530 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32294 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32293 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32293 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits N_match=982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=256 n_q2=211 n_q3=269 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.YjYlf4sAUR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=842, passed=24715 Got 24715 stars (including 23864 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24715 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=264 n_q2=210 n_q3=267 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:16:43.32 -03:04:15.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:55:03.58 -01:44:22.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:07:44.95 +02:29:31.9: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:41.35 -01:37:18.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:21:49.02 +02:01:39.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:27:12.94 -03:28:57.2: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1: 15.65 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:38:28.71 -05:01:43.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:22:30.54 +00:50:34.0: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:41.35 -01:37:18.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:16:43.32 -03:04:15.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:07:44.95 +02:29:31.9: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:55:03.58 -01:44:22.8: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:21:49.02 +02:01:39.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:07:44.95 +02:29:31.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3932 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:27:12.94 -03:28:57.2: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:38:28.71 -05:01:43.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:22:30.54 +00:50:34.0: 15.39 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:12.94 -03:28:57.2: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2796 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.24 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:30.54 +00:50:34.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8173 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.5268 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54338.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54354.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54419.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54464.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54323_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 54323_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    10.43    11:38:03.96 +02:09:41.8   8272 0886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits **** FOUND 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54338_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 54338_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54344_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 54344_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54354_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 54354_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54359_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 54359_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54364_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 54364_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    13.60    12:26:14.34 +00:32:07.5   0923 1414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits **** FOUND 12:26:14.31 +00:32:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54368_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 54368_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    13.47    11:50:31.80 -02:24:59.5   6203 3534   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits **** FOUND 11:50:31.87 -02:24:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54419_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 54419_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54421_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 54421_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    14.18    12:14:53.87 +01:02:54.5   2667 1216   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits **** FOUND 12:14:53.79 +01:02:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54424_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 54424_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    14.40    12:07:45.14 +02:29:32.8   3799 0408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    14.39    12:07:44.75 +02:29:30.9   3800 0413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54441_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 54441_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    14.47    12:27:12.75 -03:28:58.4   0633 3837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    14.11    12:27:13.13 -03:28:55.9   0630 3842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54449_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 54449_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54464_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 54464_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54525_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 The candidate 54525_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 12.22144    2461172.72144    14.82    12:22:30.51 +00:50:33.7   1505 1260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-18-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 12.22373    2461172.72373    14.81    12:22:30.57 +00:50:34.4   1504 1265   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-12_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_002411_TTUQ1b1x1_99997_8jHajP1e/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_00-22-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8 12:05:41.35 -01:37:18.5 11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.6 12:21:49.02 +02:01:39.9 12:16:43.32 -03:04:15.9 11:55:03.58 -01:44:22.8 11:38:28.71 -05:01:43.7 11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1 ########### Completed Vir-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8 12:05:41.35 -01:37:18.5 11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.6 12:21:49.02 +02:01:39.9 12:16:43.32 -03:04:15.9 11:55:03.58 -01:44:22.8 11:38:28.71 -05:01:43.7 11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1 ################################################################################### 11:38:03.95 +02:09:41.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 12:05:41.35 -01:37:18.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:53:27.26 +01:17:41.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 12:21:49.02 +02:01:39.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 12:16:43.32 -03:04:15.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:55:03.58 -01:44:22.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:38:28.71 -05:01:43.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:59:41.09 -01:49:52.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461172.72144207 -observatory V36 03:03:35.21 +17:00:36.6 Mercury (-2.0mag) 05:22:23.70 +24:30:58.5 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:32:10.51 +08:46:00.6 Mars (1.2mag) 07:27:46.84 +22:18:21.0 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:40:12.18 +01:56:08.9 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:53:40.80 +20:06:09.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:13:56.28 +00:03:50.2 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:13.67 -22:56:15.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 23:19:39.65 -03:43:28.9 Moon (-9.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 12 00:26 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461172.72144207: 07:27:40.37 +22:18:37.2 Io (5.9mag) 07:27:53.94 +22:18:01.3 Europa (6.1mag) 07:27:45.16 +22:18:31.5 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:27:17.25 +22:19:35.1 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:29:42.96 +21:56:47.9 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:27:51.38 +22:18:08.8 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:30:10.96 +22:23:26.4 Elara (17.4mag) 07:28:23.81 +22:44:34.3 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:35:23.60 +22:18:20.0 Carme (18.7mag) 00:40:22.05 +01:55:55.3 Titan (8.7mag) 00:40:09.00 +01:56:22.7 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:40:02.28 +01:54:15.2 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:40:02.92 +01:56:32.6 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:41:25.01 +02:01:48.6 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 12 00:26 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461172.72144207: 16:59:51.29 -29:32:30.1 JWST 20:58:19.23 -18:13:04.5 Chandra 08:19:04.74 -44:37:00.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 12 00:26 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461172.72144207 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 07:48:28.17 +25:20:27.2 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:55:21.84 -30:33:55.8 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:28:01.53 -68:37:41.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:39:37.91 +31:39:29.1 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:24:46.49 +13:22:43.3 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:38.24 +30:23:56.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:00:47.11 +26:38:40.2 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:13:02.66 +31:49:23.5 16.4mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:38:08.24 +02:14:57.9 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:43:59.67 +20:28:52.2 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:30:24.45 -11:09:35.0 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:00:16.90 -08:11:47.6 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:12:56.91 +64:39:31.3 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:45:00.39 -04:36:39.9 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 15:52:04.71 +88:05:00.0 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:37:49.21 +63:39:00.7 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:03:28.83 +24:30:36.6 12.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:59:33.65 +10:25:57.7 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:23:14.04 +22:52:52.3 14.3mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:51:08.46 -18:47:11.8 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:40:27.31 +39:29:04.5 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:09:57.78 +53:12:07.5 16.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 05:40:30.64 -08:02:43.3 10.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:44:12.10 +04:16:43.6 17.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 05:28:30.69 +01:20:47.5 17.9mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 01:06:27.38 +40:59:40.1 15.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:33:24.74 -08:23:38.8 10.3mag 10P/Tempel 14:28:16.47 -00:19:57.9 16.4mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:01.40 -00:56:07.7 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:43:25.61 -02:43:20.7 17.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:29:35.34 +21:45:07.7 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:02:49.76 +30:57:58.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:00:17.19 -08:34:41.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:18:15.96 +28:52:48.3 16.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:05:06.24 +13:06:52.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:16:29.89 -01:49:26.5 15.0mag 88P/Howell 03:28:36.29 +26:41:33.1 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:48:32.84 +33:15:19.6 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:05:15.32 +26:26:16.7 16.3mag 124P/Mrkos 03:14:49.06 +17:04:22.1 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:39:36.08 +17:15:47.6 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 03:47:31.09 +19:12:40.6 11.5mag 141P/Machholz 03:51:40.98 +13:32:38.3 11.4mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:32:05.73 +09:47:06.3 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:37:37.54 -29:04:23.2 17.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:17:28.58 +11:37:56.9 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:11:49.32 -10:45:33.1 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 06:33:05.46 +35:52:18.7 17.2mag 240P/NEAT 07:54:59.71 -02:50:57.3 18.0mag 242P/Spahr 23:22:53.17 -12:55:14.4 17.1mag 260P/McNaught 02:55:46.45 +26:49:59.0 17.8mag 295P/LINEAR 15:29:32.77 +08:13:42.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:47:43.54 +21:15:07.3 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:16:13.54 +43:28:36.6 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K May 12 00:26 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 2026-05-9.06 17.5 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 12 00:26 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 12 00:26 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 13:42:37.932 +03:25:31.87 AT 2026lnp 2026-05-07.23 19.3378 13:05:48.294 -23:51:09.88 AT 2026lno 2026-05-07.23 19.2731 13:28:10.220 -24:58:07.02 AT 2026lnn 2026-05-07.23 19.1862 13:01:10.346 -26:29:29.03 AT 2026lnm 2026-05-07.21 19.8458 13:06:44.896 +73:12:18.55 AT 2026lnl 2026-05-07.22 18.8585 16:53:20.972 +24:45:10.02 AT 2026lnk 2026-04-29.39 20.1096 15:20:12.330 +05:17:27.37 AT 2026lnj 2026-04-23.40 20.1549 17:43:07.678 +22:57:21.39 AT 2026lni 2026-04-23.41 20.7995 16:52:47.004 +68:05:03.93 AT 2026lnh 2026-05-06.48 18.813 11:50:05.757 +07:28:43.49 AT 2026lng 2026-05-07.19 19.3993 10:13:11.650 +10:44:10.92 AT 2026lnf 2026-05-07.20 19.5524 13:47:31.946 -04:25:18.73 AT 2026lne 2026-04-28.36 19.7647 14:21:34.611 +52:09:51.86 AT 2026lnd 2026-04-28.38 20.0861 13:52:20.676 +51:56:47.09 AT 2026lnc 2026-05-07.24 19.4231 14:12:02.479 +08:55:50.34 AT 2026lnb 2026-04-15.42 20.4511 14:54:28.469 -01:36:18.19 AT 2026lna 2026-04-23.34 20.2666 16:46:01.930 +52:07:14.56 AT 2026lmz 2026-04-28.46 20.4175 12:23:24.705 +07:03:02.11 AT 2026lmy 2026-05-02.22 19.5671 12:33:27.343 +05:00:27.57 AT 2026lmx 2026-04-20.31 20.5263 13:07:35.674 +15:13:24.73 SN 2026lmw 2026-05-02.25 19.2447 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 12 00:26 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C