This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2007 2461172.7007 11.64 16:54:40.89 -08:48:05.5
10.51221 21.04858 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 1 -0 1 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:54:40.89 -08:48:05.5: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:54:40.89 -08:48:05.5: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7007,11.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2007 11.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2007 2461172.7007 12.37 17:18:43.56 -08:29:28.5
14.16600 16.20767 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 -0 1 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:18:43.56 -08:29:28.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:18:43.56 -08:29:28.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7007,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2007 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2007 2461172.7007 13.22 17:22:49.15 -10:32:07.0
12.91150 14.27592 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 1 -0 1 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:22:49.15 -10:32:07.0: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:22:49.15 -10:32:07.0: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.2007* 17 22 49.15 -10 32 07.0 13.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7007,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2007 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2007 2461172.7007 13.82 17:12:09.40 -11:28:40.9
10.63845 15.98497 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:09.40 -11:28:40.9: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:09.40 -11:28:40.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7007,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2007 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.2007 2461172.7007 14.16 16:55:46.99 -12:10:06.7
7.70690 18.93636 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 1 -1 2 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:46.99 -12:10:06.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:46.99 -12:10:06.7: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.7007,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.2007 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461172.70102730 12.05.2026 04:49:18.759 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3882
Objects passed selection criteria: 3875
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3553.5
Average stars matched: 3475.75 (97.812 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110688 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:58:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461172.70102730 12.05.2026 04:49:18.759 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40394
Objects passed selection criteria: 40335
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37990.5
Average stars matched: 36561.2 (96.2379 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 145784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 12 00:00:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.70041655
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 3957 high-SNR stars for plate solving
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
The guess is 571 arcmin.
The guess is 571 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3270264.xyls"...
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 3939 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat from image00001.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3270267.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.180 -09:57:37.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5737 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3271194.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
### Converted positions of 5776 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3271251.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3270267.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3270264.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 427.449 (4.35043e+185), 45 match, 0 conflict, 83 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (257.173,-10.0069), pixel scale 5.95717 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++-++++++++-++--+++-+-++++-+--+-+++--------------------+------------------+--------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3270267.solved to indicate this.
log-odds ratio 439.925 (1.1401e+191), 46 match, 0 conflict, 88 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (257.162,-10.0203), pixel scale 5.95726 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++-++-+++-+++---++++++--+--++---+----------------+------------------+--------
Field: out3270267.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.154783, -9.988542) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:37.148, -09:59:18.750).
Field size: 15.7421 x 10.5416 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.559504 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3270264.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3270264.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.144050, -10.001740) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:34.572, -10:00:06.264).
Field size: 15.7424 x 10.542 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.563064 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> 'fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:58 fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:58 out3270267.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:58 fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:58 out3270264.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits (fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3270267.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3270264.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3270267.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6767 degrees of RA,Dec (257.156,-9.98771)
log-odds ratio 109.824 (4.96516e+47), 14 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (257.147,-9.98946), pixel scale 5.95724 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++--++++--++--+-+----+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3270264.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6767 degrees of RA,Dec (257.145,-10.0009)
log-odds ratio 109.199 (2.65816e+47), 14 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (257.137,-10.0027), pixel scale 5.95737 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++--++++--++--+---+--+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3270267.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3270267.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.153669, -9.987680) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:36.881, -09:59:15.647).
Field size: 15.728 x 10.5433 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.560582 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:58 fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:58 out3270267.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3270264.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3270264.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.142993, -10.000948) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:34.318, -10:00:03.413).
Field size: 15.7283 x 10.5434 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.562918 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:58 fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:58 out3270264.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 30842 sources.
simplexy: found 30783 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5385, 952.481] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 95.8058 (4.05463e+41), 13 match, 0 conflict, 292 distractors, 13 index.
RA,Dec = (257.153,-9.98852), pixel scale 5.96793 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+------++--------+---------------------+---------+--+------------------------------+---+----------
Solving...
--> log-odds 95.8058
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 220.299 (4.72923e+95), 23 match, 0 conflict, 282 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (257.153,-9.98852), pixel scale 5.96793 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+------++-+---+--+---------+++---------+---------+--+---------+--------------+-----+--++----------
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5394, 952.495] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 106.779 (2.36246e+46), 13 match, 0 conflict, 300 distractors, 13 index.
RA,Dec = (257.142,-10.0018), pixel scale 5.96801 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++----+-+-------------+-----------------------+----+--++---------------------------+-------------
--> log-odds 220.299
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 510.54 (5.30771e+221), 49 match, 0 conflict, 256 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (257.153,-9.98852), pixel scale 5.96793 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-----+++-+++-+-++-----+--++++---------+++--+----+-++--+------+---+---+---+--+--+-++--++---------+
--> log-odds 106.779
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 225.694 (1.0414e+98), 23 match, 0 conflict, 290 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (257.142,-10.0018), pixel scale 5.96801 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-+--+-+----+--------+-----------+++---------+----+-+++---------------------------+-+-----------
--> log-odds 510.54
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 952.332 (inf), 91 match, 0 conflict, 246 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (257.153,-9.98852), pixel scale 5.96793 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-+-++++-+++-+-+++--+-+--+++++--+-+-+-+++--+-+--+-++--+-+--+-+++-+-+-++--+--+--+-++-+++-----+---+
--> log-odds 225.694
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 511.362 (1.20671e+222), 49 match, 0 conflict, 264 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (257.142,-10.0018), pixel scale 5.96801 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-+-++-+--+-++--+----+--------+-++++--+----+-+-+--+-+++-++--+---------+-+----+--+-+-+--+--------
--> log-odds 952.332
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1869.14 (inf), 186 match, 0 conflict, 664 distractors, 189 index.
RA,Dec = (257.153,-9.98852), pixel scale 5.96793 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-++++++++++-++--+++++++++++--+++-+-++++-+++-++++++-++++++++++++++-++++++++-++-++-+++++++++++++
--> log-odds 511.362
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 952.309 (inf), 91 match, 0 conflict, 230 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (257.142,-10.0018), pixel scale 5.96801 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-++++-+-++-+++-+----+---++-+-+++++++-+--+++-+-+--+-+++-++--+-++--+--++-+----+--+-+-++-+-+-+-+--
--> log-odds 952.309
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
--> log-odds 1869.14
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1856.27 (inf), 185 match, 0 conflict, 634 distractors, 189 index.
RA,Dec = (257.142,-10.0018), pixel scale 5.96801 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++++++-++++++-++++++++--+-++++++++++++++++-+++-++++++-+++++-++++++-++++++-+++-++++++++-++++++-
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3474.36 (inf), 370 match, 0 conflict, 808 distractors, 377 index.
RA,Dec = (257.153,-9.98852), pixel scale 5.96793 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++-+++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++-+++++++
--> log-odds 1856.27
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3486.09 (inf), 371 match, 0 conflict, 831 distractors, 378 index.
RA,Dec = (257.142,-10.0018), pixel scale 5.96801 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++-++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++
--> log-odds 3474.36
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6201.61 (inf), 712 match, 0 conflict, 2330 distractors, 727 index.
RA,Dec = (257.153,-9.98852), pixel scale 5.96793 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3486.09
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6208.63 (inf), 714 match, 0 conflict, 2520 distractors, 729 index.
RA,Dec = (257.142,-10.0018), pixel scale 5.96801 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6201.61
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11424.4 (inf), 1427 match, 1 conflict, 4275 distractors, 1452 index.
RA,Dec = (257.153,-9.98852), pixel scale 5.96793 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6208.63
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11432 (inf), 1429 match, 1 conflict, 4372 distractors, 1452 index.
RA,Dec = (257.142,-10.0018), pixel scale 5.96801 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11424.4
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.154436, -9.988386) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:37.065, -09:59:18.190).
Field size: 15.727 x 10.5414 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.558519 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.new"...
--> log-odds 11432
Got 8 solutions.
renamed 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
Field: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (257.143729, -10.001645) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (17:08:34.495, -10:00:05.920).
Field size: 15.7274 x 10.5415 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.561335 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.new"...
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.264 -09:59:15.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
renamed 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits was not found.
### Converted positions of 4146 stars ###
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3348927.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.695 -10:00:02.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4159 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3349050.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.695 -10:00:02.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.695 -10:00:02.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.264 -09:59:15.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:37.264 -09:59:15.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.695 -10:00:02.91
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:37.264 -09:59:15.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01694 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lZjB7KBHPs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q8sC5Yf6Tw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rlWdiveifu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RqPzmoMGmi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.672700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.672700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3332 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3332 out of 5776 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lZjB7KBHPs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5737
Got 5737 stars (including 5384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.779 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.699 n_q1=183 n_q2=350 n_q3=215 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q8sC5Yf6Tw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=5776
Got 5776 stars (including 5426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=180 n_q2=353 n_q3=214 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rlWdiveifu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=239, passed=4159
Got 4159 stars (including 3916 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4159 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.719 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.633 n_q1=191 n_q2=331 n_q3=228 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RqPzmoMGmi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=241, passed=4146
Got 4146 stars (including 3899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.748 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.644 n_q1=188 n_q2=334 n_q3=229 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:54:40.89 -08:48:05.5: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:54:40.89 -08:48:05.5: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20290.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 20288_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.69 -10:50:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20290_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
Preparing report for the candidate 20290_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20298_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 20298_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:11.51 -10:52:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.81 -10:28:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:54:40.89 -08:48:05.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
The guess is 571 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.264 -09:59:15.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 938.8'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.695 -10:00:02.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.180 -09:57:37.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 43611 stars ###
### Converted positions of 43424 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3399098.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3399092.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
### Converted positions of 57367 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3399132.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
### Converted positions of 57760 stars ###
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3399184.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.8'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.695 -10:00:02.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.695 -10:00:02.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.264 -09:59:15.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:37.264 -09:59:15.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.695 -10:00:02.91
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:37.264 -09:59:15.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01694 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zalJTb8T5y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GKfuiwXRDS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x4Rj2OsdcT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.su1j2sBFR2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.433700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.433700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 57367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Loaded 4168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3229 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zalJTb8T5y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2917, passed=57752
Got 57752 stars (including 54750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.789 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.663 n_q1=195 n_q2=361 n_q3=190 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GKfuiwXRDS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2923, passed=57361
Got 57361 stars (including 54345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.665 n_q1=195 n_q2=358 n_q3=190 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x4Rj2OsdcT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1697, passed=43420
Got 43420 stars (including 41664 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.707 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=199 n_q2=330 n_q3=205 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.su1j2sBFR2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1770, passed=43609
Got 43609 stars (including 41788 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43609 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43252 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.646 n_q1=196 n_q2=340 n_q3=205 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-48-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_235617_TTUQ2b1x1_3111665_JCkZTBwy/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:03:50.59 -10:37:22.3: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:45.97 -06:42:55.4: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:57:57.14 -12:28:11.5: 14.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:09:57.45 -10:05:40.9: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:53:42.85 -11:24:57.7: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:06:49.19 -06:32:24.8: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:11:59.59 -10:46:40.7: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:03:34.73 -11:27:55.2: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:16:15.62 -13:34:02.4: 13.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:52.74 -11:33:16.4: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:09:57.45 -10:05:40.9: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:11:59.59 -10:46:40.7: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:53:42.85 -11:24:57.7: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:45.97 -06:42:55.4: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:03:50.59 -10:37:22.3: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:57:57.14 -12:28:11.5: 14.17 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:06:49.19 -06:32:24.8: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:03:34.73 -11:27:55.2: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:16:15.62 -13:34:02.4: 13.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:57.45 -10:05:40.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8352 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:42.85 -11:24:57.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4063 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:59.59 -10:46:40.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0069 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:57.14 -12:28:11.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0545 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:50.59 -10:37:22.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6507 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:45.97 -06:42:55.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5843 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:49.19 -06:32:24.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1095 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:34.73 -11:27:55.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8361 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:15.62 -13:34:02.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7074 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:52.74 -11:33:16.4: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:52.74 -11:33:16.4: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4830 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:07:42.57 -09:26:02.5: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:08:20.31 -05:51:22.7: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:28.30 -12:01:01.1: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:18:43.56 -08:29:28.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:05.44 -08:52:06.7: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:22:49.15 -10:32:07.0: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:50.56 -06:11:05.1: 15.32 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:42.66 -14:00:04.8: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:08:20.31 -05:51:22.7: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:20.31 -05:51:22.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3824 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:28.30 -12:01:01.1: 13.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:18:43.56 -08:29:28.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:07:42.57 -09:26:02.5: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:28.30 -12:01:01.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3376 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:05.44 -08:52:06.7: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:42.57 -09:26:02.5: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3038 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:05.44 -08:52:06.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3477 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:22:49.15 -10:32:07.0: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:50.56 -06:11:05.1: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:42.66 -14:00:04.8: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:44:50.56 -06:11:05.1: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=13.9523 delta=1.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:42.66 -14:00:04.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4546 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:32.51 -09:22:38.0: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:09.40 -11:28:40.9: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:01.02 -11:41:09.3: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:46.99 -12:10:06.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:17.63 -08:26:45.9: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:32.51 -09:22:38.0: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:32.51 -09:22:38.0: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9826 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:05.57 -14:11:23.2: 14.81 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:09.40 -11:28:40.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:17.63 -08:26:45.9: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:01.02 -11:41:09.3: 14.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:46.99 -12:10:06.7: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:17.63 -08:26:45.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1781 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:01.02 -11:41:09.3: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2128 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:54:21.33 -12:04:42.8: 14.91 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:05.57 -14:11:23.2: 14.63 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:05.57 -14:11:23.2: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.1258 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:47:39.53 -12:55:00.5: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:54:21.33 -12:04:42.8: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:21.33 -12:04:42.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2445 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:47.06 -13:46:54.1: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:06.13 -07:32:01.3: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:47:39.53 -12:55:00.5: 14.55 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:39.53 -12:55:00.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2306 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:51.01 -07:01:53.1: 14.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:47.06 -13:46:54.1: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:06.13 -07:32:01.3: 14.72 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:47.06 -13:46:54.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2305 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:06.13 -07:32:01.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.3253 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:01.87 -11:05:13.2: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:51.01 -07:01:53.1: 14.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:51.01 -07:01:53.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3321 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:52.65 -06:32:42.5: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:53.37 -07:10:17.5: 14.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:01.87 -11:05:13.2: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:01.87 -11:05:13.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0562 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:49:17.85 -13:41:40.1: 14.73 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:49:27.81 -06:39:15.2: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:52.65 -06:32:42.5: 14.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:52.65 -06:32:42.5: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1819 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:53.37 -07:10:17.5: 14.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:53.37 -07:10:17.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2903 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:22:38.89 -07:04:29.7: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:49:27.81 -06:39:15.2: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:27.81 -06:39:15.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3620 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:49:17.85 -13:41:40.1: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:17.85 -13:41:40.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2610 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:51:50.67 -13:06:09.1: 14.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:22:38.89 -07:04:29.7: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:38.89 -07:04:29.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3388 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:51:50.67 -13:06:09.1: 14.73 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:50.80 -10:33:56.6: 15.00 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:50.67 -13:06:09.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2853 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:57:19.05 -08:00:38.4: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:40:59.72 -07:53:34.1: 14.71 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:45:40.26 -12:24:25.9: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:50.80 -10:33:56.6: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:50.80 -10:33:56.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4862 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:57:19.05 -08:00:38.4: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:19.05 -08:00:38.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4814 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:40:59.72 -07:53:34.1: 14.71 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:59.72 -07:53:34.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3980 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:04:32.59 -14:00:59.7: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:45:40.26 -12:24:25.9: 14.99 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:40.26 -12:24:25.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3721 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:59:01.91 -07:11:28.8: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:04:32.59 -14:00:59.7: 14.90 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:32.59 -14:00:59.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3701 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:01:55.95 -10:34:04.7: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:59:08.19 -11:17:13.1: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:59:01.91 -07:11:28.8: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:01.91 -07:11:28.8: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3336 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:33.31 -09:48:13.7: 14.90 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:34.13 -10:50:41.9: 14.79 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:01:55.95 -10:34:04.7: 15.32 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:59:08.19 -11:17:13.1: 14.90 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:55.95 -10:34:04.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4440 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:08.19 -11:17:13.1: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4344 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:33.31 -09:48:13.7: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:33.31 -09:48:13.7: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5409 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:34.13 -10:50:41.9: 14.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:34.13 -10:50:41.9: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4521 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:09:10.16 -07:27:56.8: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:01:19.82 -08:25:21.1: 14.85 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:09:10.16 -07:27:56.8: 14.20 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:10.16 -07:27:56.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2784 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:56.35 -07:06:40.1: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:54:42.41 -14:01:29.2: 14.57 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:01:19.82 -08:25:21.1: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:19.82 -08:25:21.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5124 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:20:09.59 -07:57:27.8: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:56.35 -07:06:40.1: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:56.35 -07:06:40.1: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5321 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:54:42.41 -14:01:29.2: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:42.41 -14:01:29.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3605 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:20:09.59 -07:57:27.8: 14.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:09.59 -07:57:27.8: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3246 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72197.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72034.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72123.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72244.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72267.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71927_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71927_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71928_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71928_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71938_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71938_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71942_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71942_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71945_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71945_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71951_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71951_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71961_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71961_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71962_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71962_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71974_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71974_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71975_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71975_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71976_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71976_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71988_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 71988_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:51.04 -12:50:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72015_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72015_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:40.89 -08:48:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72034_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
Preparing report for the candidate 72034_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72070_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72070_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:11.80 -08:24:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.46 -14:09:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72106_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72106_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72120_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72120_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72123_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
Preparing report for the candidate 72123_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72147_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72147_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72185_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72185_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.98 -06:51:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72195_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72195_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:16.77 -13:16:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72197_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72197_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.56 -06:11:05.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.029 4352886854132808192 251.21027199778 -06.18434550436 13.1952 11.0169 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.029#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72219_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72219_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:57.38 -06:46:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72221_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72221_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:19.94 -06:45:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72229_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72229_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72239_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72239_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:10.09 -13:55:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72244_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
Preparing report for the candidate 72244_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72252_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72252_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72255_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72255_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:42.64 -07:11:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72267_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
Preparing report for the candidate 72267_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72277_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72277_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72279_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72279_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72289_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72289_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:23.01 -14:00:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72302_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72302_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72307_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72307_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72315_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72315_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72321_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72321_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72329_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72329_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72331_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72331_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:08.62 -07:06:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72334_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72334_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72340_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72340_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72359_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72359_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72376_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72376_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72393_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72393_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72404_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72404_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72422_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72422_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72423_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72423_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72429_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72429_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72434_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72434_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72453_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72453_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72461_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72461_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72471_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72471_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72472_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72472_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72484_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72484_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72488_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72488_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72494_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72494_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72502_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72502_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72507_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72507_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72517_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72517_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72546_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 72546_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:13.60 -11:50:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:09.37 -09:32:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.28 -07:07:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:06.29 -12:51:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:30.35 -11:28:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.73 -08:16:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.80 -10:28:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69808_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111
The candidate 69808_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_23-49-18_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks
