This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1897 2461172.6897 10.37 10:11:38.61 +04:14:18.9
236.76235 45.57103 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.7 Iris -2 1 2 10.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:11:38.61 +04:14:18.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:11:38.61 +04:14:18.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.1897* 10 11 38.61 +04 14 18.9 10.4 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6897,10.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1897 10.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1897 2461172.6897 12.50 10:32:26.76 +02:38:07.0
243.27995 48.71751 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.88 Thisbe -2 1 2 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:32:26.76 +02:38:07.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:32:26.76 +02:38:07.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.1897* 10 32 26.76 +02 38 07.0 12.5 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6897,12.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1897 12.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1897 2461172.6897 13.01 10:27:41.07 +08:25:43.7
234.94691 51.22699 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.35 Leukothea -2 1 2 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:27:41.07 +08:25:43.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:27:41.07 +08:25:43.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.1897* 10 27 41.07 +08 25 43.7 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6897,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1897 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1897 2461172.6897 13.26 10:41:02.12 +07:25:21.7
239.39513 53.35913 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria -2 1 2 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:41:02.12 +07:25:21.7: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:41:02.12 +07:25:21.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.1897* 10 41 02.12 +07 25 21.7 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6897,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1897 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1897 2461172.6897 13.58 10:16:52.08 +07:20:30.4
234.07354 48.39172 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.554 Peraga -2 1 2 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:16:52.08 +07:20:30.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:16:52.08 +07:20:30.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.1897* 10 16 52.08 +07 20 30.4 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6897,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1897 13.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1897 2461172.6897 13.91 10:40:52.54 +07:25:43.9
239.34737 53.33099 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.136 Austria -2 1 2 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:40:52.54 +07:25:43.9: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:40:52.54 +07:25:43.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.1897* 10 40 52.54 +07 25 43.9 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6897,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1897 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1897 2461172.6897 14.14 10:19:43.57 +04:12:43.6
238.50361 47.18940 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.336 Lacadiera -1 1 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:19:43.57 +04:12:43.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:19:43.57 +04:12:43.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.1897* 10 19 43.57 +04 12 43.6 14.1 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6897,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1897 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1897 2461172.6897 14.72 10:18:22.12 +09:54:29.2
231.04196 50.06692 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.808 Merxia -2 2 3 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:18:22.12 +09:54:29.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:18:22.12 +09:54:29.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 12.1897* 10 18 22.12 +09 54 29.2 14.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6897,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1897 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
First image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Last image: 2461172.68997677 12.05.2026 04:33:23.993 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7171
Objects passed selection criteria: 7169
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6940.75
Average stars matched: 6652.25 (95.8434 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112896 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:48:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
First image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Last image: 2461172.68997677 12.05.2026 04:33:23.993 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 40
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35614
Objects passed selection criteria: 35539
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34292
Average stars matched: 32658 (95.235 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:49:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.68950321
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6031 high-SNR stars for plate solving
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits was not found.
The guess is 570 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6081 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2646898.xyls"...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2646899.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Generating wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:12.546 +05:58:35.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6928 stars ###
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2647328.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
### Converted positions of 6613 stars ###
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2647367.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2646898.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out2646899.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 81.0943 (1.65508e+35), 13 match, 0 conflict, 28 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (154.285,6.00927), pixel scale 5.97763 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+-+++-+++----+--+-+-----------------+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2646898.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 82.8339 (9.42546e+35), 13 match, 0 conflict, 26 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (154.285,5.9985), pixel scale 5.97761 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+-+++-+++--++---+-----------------+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2646899.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2646898.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (154.286215, 6.006670) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:17:08.692, +06:00:24.012).
Field size: 15.7838 x 10.5733 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.476 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out2646899.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (154.286146, 5.995874) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:17:08.675, +05:59:45.147).
Field size: 15.7838 x 10.5733 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.476 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header...
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits' -> 'fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> 'fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:48 fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:48 out2646898.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:48 fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:48 out2646899.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits)... done!
Opening FITS image file fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits (fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits (fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2646898.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2646899.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2646898.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.74 degrees of RA,Dec (154.285,6.00589)
log-odds ratio 81.0943 (1.65508e+35), 13 match, 0 conflict, 28 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (154.285,6.00927), pixel scale 5.97763 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+-+++-+++----+--+-+-----------------+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2646899.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.74 degrees of RA,Dec (154.285,5.9951)
log-odds ratio 82.8339 (9.42546e+35), 13 match, 0 conflict, 26 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (154.285,5.9985), pixel scale 5.97761 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+-+++-+++--++---+-----------------+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2646898.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2646898.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (154.285495, 6.008768) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:17:08.519, +06:00:31.565).
Field size: 15.7702 x 10.5747 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.474 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:48 fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:48 out2646898.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits)... Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2646899.solved to indicate this.
done!
Field: out2646899.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (154.285455, 5.997960) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:17:08.509, +05:59:52.656).
Field size: 15.7703 x 10.5745 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.474 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:48 fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:48 out2646899.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... done!
Opening FITS image file fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 25234 sources.
simplexy: found 25648 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7114, 955.073] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 10.6928
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 195.89 (1.18526e+85), 24 match, 0 conflict, 337 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,6.00955), pixel scale 5.98416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--------++----+----------+-----------+-----+---+-----+----------+-------------------------+---+--
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7119, 955.08] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 195.89
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 534.039 (8.5115e+231), 53 match, 0 conflict, 308 distractors, 54 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,6.00955), pixel scale 5.98416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----+---++-++-++--+-+----+-------+---++----+---+----++-++----+--++---+----++-+------------+---+-+
--> log-odds 17.6504
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 201.441 (3.05155e+87), 24 match, 0 conflict, 321 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,5.99874), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+------+-------+--+-----+++-----------------+---++---------------------------------+------+-------
--> log-odds 534.039
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 941.882 (inf), 93 match, 0 conflict, 324 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,6.00955), pixel scale 5.98416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+---++---++-++-++--+-+--+-++--++-++-++++----++--+----++-+++-+-+--++---+-+--++-++---+-+-----+---+-+
--> log-odds 201.441
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 539.37 (1.76024e+234), 53 match, 0 conflict, 292 distractors, 54 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,5.99874), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+---+--+---+---+--+-++--++++----------+-+-+++-+-++----+-++--+-----++--------+-+----+--+--++-------
--> log-odds 941.882
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1927.37 (inf), 193 match, 0 conflict, 280 distractors, 196 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,6.00955), pixel scale 5.98416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++++++-+++++-++++-++-+++++++++--++++++++++-++--+++++++++-+++++-++++++-+++++--++-+-+++-+--++++
--> log-odds 539.37
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 949.656 (inf), 93 match, 0 conflict, 308 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,5.99874), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+-++-+---++--+-++-+++++++++------+--+-+-+++++-++----+-++++++----++--+--+--+++----+-++-+++--+----
--> log-odds 949.656
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1931.61 (inf), 193 match, 0 conflict, 248 distractors, 196 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,5.99874), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++-++-+++++++++++++++++-+++-+++-++++++++++--+-+++++++++-++++-+++-+++++++---++++-++++-++---
--> log-odds 1927.37
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3555.34 (inf), 377 match, 0 conflict, 506 distractors, 380 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,6.00955), pixel scale 5.98416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++-+++++++++++++
--> log-odds 1931.61
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3556.5 (inf), 377 match, 0 conflict, 381 distractors, 380 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,5.99874), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++-+++++++++++++-++
--> log-odds 3555.34
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6342.52 (inf), 724 match, 0 conflict, 835 distractors, 736 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,6.00955), pixel scale 5.98416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3556.5
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6330.9 (inf), 723 match, 0 conflict, 972 distractors, 735 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,5.99874), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6342.52
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11601.9 (inf), 1437 match, 0 conflict, 2751 distractors, 1454 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,6.00955), pixel scale 5.98416 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6330.9
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11592.9 (inf), 1435 match, 0 conflict, 2729 distractors, 1452 index.
RA,Dec = (154.286,5.99874), pixel scale 5.98421 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11601.9
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (154.284666, 6.009249) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:17:08.320, +06:00:33.295).
Field size: 15.7681 x 10.5714 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.468 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
--> log-odds 11592.9
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (154.284623, 5.998438) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (10:17:08.309, +05:59:54.378).
Field size: 15.7681 x 10.5714 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.469 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.new"...
Generating wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:08.107 +06:00:30.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
renamed 'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
### Converted positions of 7188 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2660537.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:08.097 +05:59:51.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7220 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2660674.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:08.097 +05:59:51.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:08.097 +05:59:51.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0153 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:08.107 +06:00:30.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:08.107 +06:00:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0229 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:08.097 +05:59:51.58
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:08.107 +06:00:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01081 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0r77fISNRh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l0KkPn9dzn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jn9dDM4wTB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.td0rNvntKo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2921 deg
Loaded 4744 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3795 out of 3932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3932 out of 6928 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.778300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.778300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2921 deg
Loaded 4744 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3795 out of 3932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3932 out of 6928 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6613 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1402 to 162.6215 deg, Dec +0.1984 to +11.5941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1402 to 162.6215 deg, Dec 0.1984 to 11.5941 deg
Loaded 5210 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3754 out of 3927 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3927 out of 6613 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
3.6 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
3.6 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.2 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0r77fISNRh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, passed=6928
Got 6928 stars (including 6481 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.468 n_q1=213 n_q2=231 n_q3=223 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l0KkPn9dzn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=6613
Got 6613 stars (including 6136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=220 n_q2=207 n_q3=235 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jn9dDM4wTB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=310, passed=7220
Got 7220 stars (including 6908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=232 n_q2=219 n_q3=225 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.td0rNvntKo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, passed=7188
Got 7188 stars (including 6881 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7188 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=231 n_q2=220 n_q3=228 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:45:06.02 +04:21:00.1: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:14:08.25 +07:26:08.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:17:54.32 +07:34:59.0: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:40:19.28 +10:35:42.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:21:22.86 +06:31:09.0: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:35:18.99 +03:45:32.4: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:20:35.19 +05:38:57.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:11:38.61 +04:14:18.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:00:38.63 +08:23:50.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:19:14.50 +07:02:06.3: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:45:06.02 +04:21:00.1: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:45:06.02 +04:21:00.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2958 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:35:18.99 +03:45:32.4: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:14:08.25 +07:26:08.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:40:19.28 +10:35:42.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:11:38.61 +04:14:18.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:21:22.86 +06:31:09.0: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:20:35.19 +05:38:57.4: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:08.25 +07:26:08.6: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3600 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:18.99 +03:45:32.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3438 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:19.28 +10:35:42.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3004 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:00:38.63 +08:23:50.8: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:17:54.32 +07:34:59.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:22.86 +06:31:09.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3544 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:35.19 +05:38:57.4: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2176 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:38.63 +08:23:50.8: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2408 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:54.32 +07:34:59.0: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3299 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:19:14.50 +07:02:06.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:14.50 +07:02:06.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3507 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:25:16.49 +05:14:01.2: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:18:23.34 +05:59:51.9: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:20:08.27 +06:22:40.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:13:39.67 +06:41:42.5: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:07:26.81 +06:28:08.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:19:07.67 +05:16:58.0: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:25:16.49 +05:14:01.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:25:16.49 +05:14:01.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3748 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:18:23.34 +05:59:51.9: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:20:08.27 +06:22:40.9: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:07:26.81 +06:28:08.6: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:19:07.67 +05:16:58.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:13:39.67 +06:41:42.5: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:18:23.34 +05:59:51.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3554 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:08.27 +06:22:40.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3933 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:07.67 +05:16:58.0: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3730 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:07:26.81 +06:28:08.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3959 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:39.67 +06:41:42.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3576 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20590_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 20590_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20592_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20592_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20593_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20593_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20596_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20596_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20597_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20597_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20598_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:26.51 +05:34:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20599_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20600_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20600_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20601_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20602_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20602_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20603_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20604_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20606_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20606_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20607_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20607_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20608_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20608_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20609_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20609_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20610_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20610_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:11:38.61 +04:14:18.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:08.097 +05:59:51.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:08.107 +06:00:30.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:12.546 +05:58:35.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 31249 stars ###
### Converted positions of 31325 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2692223.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2692222.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
### Converted positions of 36425 stars ###
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2692257.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
### Converted positions of 39278 stars ###
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2692270.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:08.097 +05:59:51.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:08.097 +05:59:51.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0153 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:08.107 +06:00:30.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:08.107 +06:00:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0229 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:08.097 +05:59:51.58
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:08.107 +06:00:30.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01081 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XweJKUh3KG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cLPHREzuuw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DXuQ7j4xOl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dgkDWEWFWh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2954 deg
Loaded 4750 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4031 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4031 out of 36425 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.665200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.665200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 36425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2954 deg
Loaded 4750 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4031 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4031 out of 36425 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 39278 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1293 to 162.6351 deg, Dec +0.1788 to +11.6671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1293 to 162.6351 deg, Dec 0.1788 to 11.6671 deg
Loaded 5262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3705 out of 4075 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4075 out of 39278 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
3.3 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
3.3 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.4 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XweJKUh3KG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1564, passed=36403
Got 36403 stars (including 34801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=211 n_q2=241 n_q3=205 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cLPHREzuuw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1637, passed=39258
Got 39258 stars (including 37533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=221 n_q2=212 n_q3=225 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DXuQ7j4xOl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1196, passed=31307
Got 31307 stars (including 30074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31307 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=234 n_q2=221 n_q3=223 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dgkDWEWFWh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1201, passed=31238
Got 31238 stars (including 29994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31238 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=233 n_q2=220 n_q3=224 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-32-43_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_234609_TTUQ1b1x1_2638465_UP33LJ8V/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:35:01.81 +06:16:17.6: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:32:26.76 +02:38:07.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:42:30.08 +05:02:29.8: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 09:47:08.23 +09:57:38.1: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:27:41.07 +08:25:43.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 09:59:37.96 +06:02:41.7: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:19:00.52 +01:00:52.9: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:41:02.12 +07:25:21.7: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:16:52.08 +07:20:30.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:32:26.76 +02:38:07.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:35:01.81 +06:16:17.6: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:59:37.96 +06:02:41.7: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:01.81 +06:16:17.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4354 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:42:30.08 +05:02:29.8: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:47:08.23 +09:57:38.1: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:27:41.07 +08:25:43.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:19:00.52 +01:00:52.9: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:41:02.12 +07:25:21.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:37.96 +06:02:41.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2604 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:30.08 +05:02:29.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2252 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:08.23 +09:57:38.1: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4295 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:00.52 +01:00:52.9: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7912 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:44:48.36 +06:01:17.7: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:16:52.08 +07:20:30.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:48.36 +06:01:17.7: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:48.36 +06:01:17.7: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8062 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:20:22.21 +08:41:40.4: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:40:52.54 +07:25:43.9: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:38:07.65 +03:28:37.5: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:45:02.67 +02:12:28.9: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:20:22.21 +08:41:40.4: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:22.21 +08:41:40.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6950 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:40:52.54 +07:25:43.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:38:07.65 +03:28:37.5: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:07.65 +03:28:37.5: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1428 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:32:46.23 +01:23:58.8: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:19:43.57 +04:12:43.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:45:02.67 +02:12:28.9: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:45:02.67 +02:12:28.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3606 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:32:46.23 +01:23:58.8: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:32:46.23 +01:23:58.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2909 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:19:43.57 +04:12:43.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:44:10.46 +05:05:41.1: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:46:53.28 +06:00:43.3: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:10.46 +05:05:41.1: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:10.46 +05:05:41.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5466 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:46:53.28 +06:00:43.3: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:53.28 +06:00:43.3: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4947 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:41:50.49 +04:19:50.6: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:32:36.24 +09:09:20.1: 15.47 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:41:50.49 +04:19:50.6: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:50.49 +04:19:50.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5547 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:28:17.10 +10:43:45.6: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:37:15.88 +05:47:19.0: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:32:36.24 +09:09:20.1: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:32:36.24 +09:09:20.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7846 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:28:17.10 +10:43:45.6: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:17.10 +10:43:45.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7642 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:37:15.88 +05:47:19.0: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:15.88 +05:47:19.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7983 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:36:59.31 +05:16:54.3: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:18:22.12 +09:54:29.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:36:59.31 +05:16:54.3: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:59.31 +05:16:54.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7103 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:09:02.15 +07:55:23.2: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:18:22.12 +09:54:29.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:09:02.15 +07:55:23.2: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:02.15 +07:55:23.2: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8325 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55899.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55916.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55932.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55964.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56070.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55872_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55872_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55873_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55873_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55875_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55875_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55876_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55876_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55881_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55881_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55882_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55882_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:22.40 +06:03:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55884_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55884_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:38.61 +04:14:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55891_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 55891_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55899_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 55899_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55902_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 55902_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55916_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 55916_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55919_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55919_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:15.46 +08:59:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55922_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55922_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55923_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55923_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55927_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55927_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:42:06.43 +09:22:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55932_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 55932_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55942_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55942_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:55.27 +06:58:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55951_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55951_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55960_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55960_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55962_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55962_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:03:02.70 +05:05:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55963_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55963_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55964_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 55964_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55987_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55987_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55999_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 55999_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56000_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56000_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:10.58 +04:12:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56015_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56015_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56021_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56021_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56033_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56033_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56043_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56043_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56046_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56046_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56052_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56052_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56070_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 56070_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56085_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 56085_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15175_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 15175_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-33-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
