This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1789 2461172.6789 11.29 13:54:18.57 -33:43:12.9
317.62753 27.35100 galactic Cen Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.704 Interamnia 2 -1 2 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:54:18.57 -33:43:12.9: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:54:18.57 -33:43:12.9: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6789,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1789 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1789 2461172.6789 11.03 13:38:14.45 -36:45:19.7
313.27462 25.17454 galactic Cen Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J133815-3645.3
Type: SR|ESD|ED
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.770 Ic Y 0.283 Ic 2453525.70000 308.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:38:14.45 -36:45:19.7: 11.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:38:14.45 -36:45:19.7: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J133815-3645.3,2461172.6789,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J133815-3645.3 20260512.1789 11.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1789 2461172.6789 12.02 13:55:12.15 -32:18:08.4
318.27305 28.66277 galactic Cen Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J135512-3218.1
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 V Y 0.960 V 2452082.20000 201.775626000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:55:12.15 -32:18:08.4: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:55:12.15 -32:18:08.4: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J135512-3218.1,2461172.6789,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J135512-3218.1 20260512.1789 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1789 2461172.6789 11.24 13:52:27.51 -37:11:47.4
316.20544 24.09743 galactic Cen Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J135227-3711.8
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.640 V Y 0.290 V 2452008.30000 60.851929000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:52:27.51 -37:11:47.4: 12.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:52:27.51 -37:11:47.4: 12.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J135227-3711.8,2461172.6789,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J135227-3711.8 20260512.1789 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1789 2461172.6789 8.76 13:48:20.79 -36:51:47.2
315.42381 24.62436 galactic Cen Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" RT Cen
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.100 V 13.600 V 2453833.00000 250.000000000000 M6-M9II:e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:48:20.79 -36:51:47.2: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:48:20.79 -36:51:47.2: 10.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.91 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RT Cen,2461172.6789,8.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RT Cen 20260512.1789 8.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1789 2461172.6789 11.40 13:36:29.35 -38:37:46.3
312.50197 23.40360 galactic Cen Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J133629.43-383748.2
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.160 V 13.690 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:36:29.35 -38:37:46.3: 12.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:36:29.35 -38:37:46.3: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J133629.43-383748.2,2461172.6789,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J133629.43-383748.2 20260512.1789 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1789 2461172.6789 10.73 14:00:56.98 -34:23:25.0
318.89210 26.31794 galactic Cen Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASAS J140057-3423.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.397 Ic Y 0.381 Ic 2452895.50000 215.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:00:56.98 -34:23:25.0: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:00:56.98 -34:23:25.0: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J140057-3423.4,2461172.6789,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J140057-3423.4 20260512.1789 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.79871279 22.03.2026 07:09:58.785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
First image: 2461121.79871279 22.03.2026 07:09:58.785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Last image: 2461172.67911456 12.05.2026 04:17:45.498 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 37
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6068
Objects passed selection criteria: 6068
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5774.75
Average stars matched: 5650.5 (97.8484 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112132 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:32:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.79871279 22.03.2026 07:09:58.785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
First image: 2461121.79871279 22.03.2026 07:09:58.785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Last image: 2461172.67911456 12.05.2026 04:17:45.498 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 61
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40249
Objects passed selection criteria: 40206
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35536.8
Average stars matched: 33174.5 (93.3527 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 143980 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:35:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.67866179
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 4315 high-SNR stars for plate solving
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
The guess is 573 arcmin.
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 4320 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1928659.xyls"...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat from image00001.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1928658.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 937.6'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:55.748 -34:00:37.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.1'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:34:01.877 -34:00:29.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6749 stars ###
### Converted positions of 5901 stars ###
'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1929074.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1929127.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1928659.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out1928658.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 46.0051 (9.54493e+19), 10 match, 0 conflict, 21 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (203.484,-34.0026), pixel scale 5.97787 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+++-++----+----+-----+-----+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1928659.solved to indicate this.
log-odds ratio 42.0941 (1.91084e+18), 9 match, 0 conflict, 22 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (203.494,-34.0025), pixel scale 5.97784 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+-+-+--+--+----+-----+-----+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field: out1928659.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (203.477566, -34.005155) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:33:54.616, -34:00:18.559).
Field size: 15.7891 x 10.5861 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.42898 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1928658.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1928658.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (203.488041, -34.005129) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:33:57.130, -34:00:18.463).
Field size: 15.7893 x 10.5862 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.42822 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:32 fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:32 out1928659.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:32 fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:32 out1928658.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1928659.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1928658.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1928658.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7083 degrees of RA,Dec (203.489,-34.0044)
log-odds ratio 42.0941 (1.91084e+18), 9 match, 0 conflict, 22 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (203.494,-34.0025), pixel scale 5.97784 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+-+-+--+--+----+-----+-----+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1928659.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7067 degrees of RA,Dec (203.479,-34.0044)
log-odds ratio 46.0051 (9.54493e+19), 10 match, 0 conflict, 21 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (203.484,-34.0026), pixel scale 5.97787 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+++-++----+----+-----+-----+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1928658.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1928658.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (203.488354, -34.004398) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:33:57.205, -34:00:15.833).
Field size: 15.7612 x 10.5852 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.44402 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1928659.solved to indicate this.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:32 fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:32 out1928658.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits)... done!
Field: out1928659.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (203.477828, -34.004441) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:33:54.679, -34:00:15.989).
Field size: 15.7611 x 10.5848 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.44458 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:32 fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:32 out1928659.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 21079 sources.
simplexy: found 21025 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.748, 955.621] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 96.1381 (5.6524e+41), 14 match, 0 conflict, 188 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (203.487,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.9876 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----------+-+----------------------+-----++---------+---+-------+--------------------+------------
--> log-odds 96.1381
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 137.789 (6.93716e+59), 19 match, 0 conflict, 183 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (203.487,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.9876 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----------+------------------------+-----++-------+-+---+----+--+------+-+-----------+-+----------
--> log-odds 137.789
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 427.158 (3.25345e+185), 49 match, 0 conflict, 296 distractors, 50 index.
RA,Dec = (203.487,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.9876 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+-+--+-++-+-+--++----+-+---++--+-++++--++-------+-+---+--+-+--+----+-+-+-----------+-+----------
--> log-odds 427.158
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 708.56 (5.29456e+307), 83 match, 0 conflict, 262 distractors, 93 index.
RA,Dec = (203.487,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.9876 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+-+--+-++-+-+--++-+--+++--+++--+-++++-+++-+-+-+++-+-+-+--+-++-+-+--+-+-+-----+---+-+++---+--+--+
--> log-odds 708.56
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1401.73 (inf), 170 match, 0 conflict, 187 distractors, 190 index.
RA,Dec = (203.487,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.9876 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+--++++++-+++++++-++++--+++-++-++++--++++-+-+++++++-++++-++++-++++-+-++-++-+-+++++++-+-+-+++-+
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7478, 955.618] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 97.7147 (2.73502e+42), 14 match, 0 conflict, 204 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (203.477,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.98758 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-----------+---+--------+-+---------------+--------+-----------+---------------------------------
--> log-odds 1401.73
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2603.72 (inf), 339 match, 0 conflict, 485 distractors, 379 index.
RA,Dec = (203.487,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.9876 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++-+++++++++++++++++++--+++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++-++++++-++-++++-+++++++-+++++++-+
--> log-odds 97.7147
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 138.358 (1.2245e+60), 19 match, 0 conflict, 199 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (203.477,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.98758 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+---------------+--------+-+--------------++--------+-----------+----------------+-----+----+--+--
--> log-odds 2603.72
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
--> log-odds 138.358
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
log-odds ratio 4515.9 (inf), 640 match, 0 conflict, 808 distractors, 734 index.
RA,Dec = (203.487,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.9876 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++-++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++-++++++-++-++++-+++++++-+++++++-+
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 421.44 (1.06883e+183), 49 match, 0 conflict, 296 distractors, 50 index.
RA,Dec = (203.477,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.98758 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++---+--+--+++---+--+--+--+-+-+--------+---++----+---++--+---++--+-----+-+--------+--+--+----+--+--
--> log-odds 421.44
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 709.459 (1.30038e+308), 83 match, 0 conflict, 262 distractors, 93 index.
RA,Dec = (203.477,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.98758 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++--+--+--+++--+++-+-++--+-+-+--+----++---+++-+-+---+++-++--+++++-+---+-++--+-+--+--+--+--+-++-+--
--> log-odds 4515.9
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 8157.71 (inf), 1267 match, 0 conflict, 1592 distractors, 1461 index.
RA,Dec = (203.487,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.9876 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++-++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++--++++++++++++++-+++++++++-++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+
--> log-odds 709.459
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1400.05 (inf), 170 match, 0 conflict, 203 distractors, 190 index.
RA,Dec = (203.477,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.98758 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++--++-++--++++++++++-+++++++++++++-+-++--++++-+-+-+++++-+++-+++++++---+-+-+-+++--+-++--+-+++++++-+
--> log-odds 1400.05
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2606.19 (inf), 339 match, 0 conflict, 460 distractors, 379 index.
RA,Dec = (203.477,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.98758 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++--++++++++++-+++++++++++++-+++++-++++++-+-+++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++++--+++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 8157.71
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (203.487261, -34.005113) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:33:56.943, -34:00:18.406).
Field size: 15.7636 x 10.584 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.43243 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.new"...
--> log-odds 2606.19
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 4517.45 (inf), 642 match, 0 conflict, 1014 distractors, 734 index.
RA,Dec = (203.477,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.98758 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++--++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++-++++++-+-+++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++--+++++++-+++++++++
renamed 'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
--> log-odds 4517.45
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 8151 (inf), 1265 match, 0 conflict, 1714 distractors, 1461 index.
RA,Dec = (203.477,-34.0052), pixel scale 5.98758 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++--++++-+++++-+++++++++++++++++++-++++++-+-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++--+++++++-+++++-+++
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:57.197 -34:00:15.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5323 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1941037.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
--> log-odds 8151
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (203.476796, -34.005234) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:33:54.431, -34:00:18.841).
Field size: 15.7634 x 10.5838 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.43297 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:54.685 -34:00:16.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5302 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1941159.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Image size: 937.6'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:55.748 -34:00:37.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:57.197 -34:00:15.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:33:55.748 -34:00:37.58
Second-epoch image center 13:33:57.197 -34:00:15.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:54.685 -34:00:16.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:33:55.748 -34:00:37.58
Second-epoch image center 13:33:54.685 -34:00:16.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0070 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:33:57.197 -34:00:15.60
Second-epoch second image center 13:33:54.685 -34:00:16.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00868 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pGswkNKHBt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pIqrfvYIpl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DwuqBoqb7y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vnw16G2TWi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits and wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits and wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits and wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6749 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 193.5076 to 213.3601 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5631 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 193.5076 to 213.3601 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5631 deg
Loaded 9940 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5587 out of 5686 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5686 out of 6749 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.668500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.668500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6749 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 193.5076 to 213.3601 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5631 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 193.5076 to 213.3601 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5631 deg
Loaded 9940 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5587 out of 5686 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5686 out of 6749 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5901 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 193.1520 to 213.1503 deg, Dec -39.4682 to -28.0177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 193.1520 to 213.1503 deg, Dec -39.4682 to -28.0177 deg
Loaded 10574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4902 out of 5021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5021 out of 5901 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.2 pix Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
4.8 pix fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
4.8 pix fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
14.2 mag. Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pGswkNKHBt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=6749
Got 6749 stars (including 6341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6749 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=256 n_q2=252 n_q3=206 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pIqrfvYIpl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, passed=5901
Got 5901 stars (including 5409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5901 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.617 n_q1=272 n_q2=238 n_q3=210 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DwuqBoqb7y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=236, passed=5323
Got 5323 stars (including 5087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5323 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=227 n_q2=245 n_q3=226 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vnw16G2TWi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=240, passed=5302
Got 5302 stars (including 5062 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=229 n_q2=242 n_q3=225 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cen-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:29:48.73 -34:45:59.8: 11.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:54:18.57 -33:43:12.9: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:30:21.99 -30:07:13.8: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:00:57.07 -34:23:24.6: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:08:06.63 -28:36:16.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:27:12.54 -30:07:59.8: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:21:29.50 -28:43:15.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:29:48.73 -34:45:59.8: 11.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:23:23.31 -28:54:28.0: 11.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:29:48.73 -34:45:59.8: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0575 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:36:36.56 -30:05:46.0: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:27:12.54 -30:07:59.8: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:23:23.31 -28:54:28.0: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:27:12.54 -30:07:59.8: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3732 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:23:23.31 -28:54:28.0: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3810 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:21:29.50 -28:43:15.7: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:29.50 -28:43:15.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:15:39.33 -28:59:56.1: 11.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:54:18.57 -33:43:12.9: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:30:21.99 -30:07:13.8: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:30:21.99 -30:07:13.8: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1375 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:00:57.07 -34:23:24.6: 11.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:00:57.07 -34:23:24.6: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.7805 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:08:06.63 -28:36:16.0: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:08:06.63 -28:36:16.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:36:36.56 -30:05:46.0: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:36:36.56 -30:05:46.0: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3712 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:08:06.39 -29:40:01.8: 11.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:15:39.33 -28:59:56.1: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:39.33 -28:59:56.1: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4220 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:33:06.76 -29:52:39.9: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:10:22.25 -28:55:37.1: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:07:48.63 -29:18:02.5: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:08:06.39 -29:40:01.8: 11.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:07:03.67 -30:19:56.8: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:08:06.39 -29:40:01.8: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3918 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:33:06.76 -29:52:39.9: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:10:22.25 -28:55:37.1: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:33:06.76 -29:52:39.9: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4082 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:22.25 -28:55:37.1: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3962 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:07:48.63 -29:18:02.5: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:48.63 -29:18:02.5: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3930 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:33:25.13 -30:39:44.5: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:07:03.67 -30:19:56.8: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:03.67 -30:19:56.8: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3959 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:44:50.60 -31:50:15.6: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:05:22.76 -29:19:05.5: 11.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:27:20.26 -29:27:42.1: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:33:25.13 -30:39:44.5: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:33:25.13 -30:39:44.5: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4170 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:44:50.60 -31:50:15.6: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:44:50.60 -31:50:15.6: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4500 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:05:22.76 -29:19:05.5: 11.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:27:20.26 -29:27:42.1: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:05:22.76 -29:19:05.5: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4637 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:27:20.26 -29:27:42.1: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4172 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:06:00.40 -28:52:17.2: 11.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:06:00.40 -28:52:17.2: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:06:00.40 -28:52:17.2: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4683 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20349.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20344_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20344_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:32:12.75 -33:54:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20347_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20347_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:51:53.41 -37:36:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20349_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:00:57.07 -34:23:24.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.666 6122395242439041920 210.23891987370 -34.38975419055 9.6347 8.1080 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.666#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20350_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:01:05.78 -30:11:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20351_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:28:00.37 -36:25:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20352_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20352_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20353_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:34:54.82 -32:41:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20356_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:49:14.48 -29:40:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20357_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 20359_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20360_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:00:18.17 -28:37:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20361_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20361_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20364_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:02:34.91 -29:35:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20369_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20370_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20370_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20371_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20373_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20373_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20374_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20375_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20375_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20376_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20377_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20377_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20379_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20379_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:42:40.12 -29:49:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20380_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20380_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20381_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20382_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:00:28.51 -29:22:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20383_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20383_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:59:21.26 -29:52:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20384_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20384_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:03:08.88 -30:08:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20386_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20389_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20389_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:49:30.55 -30:23:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20390_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20390_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20392_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20392_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20396_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20396_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20397_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20397_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20398_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20398_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:01:53.58 -30:07:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03937_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 03937_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:41:45.31 -33:35:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cen-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
13:54:18.57 -33:43:12.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 571 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:57.197 -34:00:15.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:54.685 -34:00:16.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.6'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:55.748 -34:00:37.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.1'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:34:01.877 -34:00:29.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 26326 stars ###
### Converted positions of 26191 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2123251.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2123241.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
### Converted positions of 42916 stars ###
'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2123343.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
### Converted positions of 48265 stars ###
'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2123387.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Image size: 937.6'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:55.748 -34:00:37.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:57.197 -34:00:15.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:33:55.748 -34:00:37.58
Second-epoch image center 13:33:57.197 -34:00:15.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:33:54.685 -34:00:16.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:33:55.748 -34:00:37.58
Second-epoch image center 13:33:54.685 -34:00:16.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0070 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:33:57.197 -34:00:15.60
Second-epoch second image center 13:33:54.685 -34:00:16.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00868 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h1E68lF36I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wq4rH1vOlu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T0G4Nnmt1z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jCGVIJGHVC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits and wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits and wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits and wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 193.4228 to 213.4845 deg, Dec -39.2845 to -28.4724 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 193.4228 to 213.4845 deg, Dec -39.2845 to -28.4724 deg
Loaded 10116 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7834 out of 8365 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8365 out of 42916 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.513000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.513000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 193.4228 to 213.4845 deg, Dec -39.2845 to -28.4724 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 193.4228 to 213.4845 deg, Dec -39.2845 to -28.4724 deg
Loaded 10116 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7834 out of 8365 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8365 out of 42916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 48265 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 193.1087 to 213.1675 deg, Dec -39.4754 to -27.9666 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 193.1087 to 213.1675 deg, Dec -39.4754 to -27.9666 deg
Loaded 10650 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7903 out of 8477 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8477 out of 48265 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
1.9 pix Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
4.2 pix fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
4.2 pix fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
14.3 mag. Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.h1E68lF36I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1913, passed=42911
Got 42911 stars (including 40945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42911 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=254 n_q2=253 n_q3=203 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wq4rH1vOlu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1979, passed=48258
Got 48258 stars (including 46199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.529 n_q1=287 n_q2=252 n_q3=205 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T0G4Nnmt1z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1570, passed=26319
Got 26319 stars (including 24729 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26319 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=207 n_q2=242 n_q3=238 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jCGVIJGHVC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1590, passed=26185
Got 26185 stars (including 24583 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26185 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=211 n_q2=240 n_q3=234 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_232814_TTUQ1b1x1_1806885_WCtkd5rk/wcs_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cen-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:07:12.21 -34:53:04.9: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:43:51.08 -35:51:56.2: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:03:01.59 -33:06:19.0: 12.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:04:56.80 -32:26:07.9: 13.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:23:23.38 -33:27:48.6: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:37:05.10 -35:10:30.6: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:10:55.15 -38:16:06.8: 12.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:03:01.59 -33:06:19.0: 12.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:11:23.75 -37:58:17.6: 12.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:01.59 -33:06:19.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1079 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:07:12.21 -34:53:04.9: 12.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:43:51.08 -35:51:56.2: 13.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:12.21 -34:53:04.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5630 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:43:51.08 -35:51:56.2: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5391 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 12:54:55.94 -37:34:51.6: 11.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:23:23.38 -33:27:48.6: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:37:05.10 -35:10:30.6: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:23:23.38 -33:27:48.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9328 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:37:05.10 -35:10:30.6: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4001 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:10:55.15 -38:16:06.8: 12.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:55.15 -38:16:06.8: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.4294 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:11:23.75 -37:58:17.6: 11.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:23.75 -37:58:17.6: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7730 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 12:54:55.94 -37:34:51.6: 11.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:54:55.94 -37:34:51.6: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6285 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:04:56.80 -32:26:07.9: 13.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:56.80 -32:26:07.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0006 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:52:39.39 -30:29:31.5: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:24:53.70 -30:20:03.2: 13.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:36:37.18 -29:58:56.2: 13.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:07:16.21 -29:15:00.1: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:17:41.28 -29:58:33.7: 14.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:29:55.14 -29:58:28.0: 14.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:52:39.39 -30:29:31.5: 13.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:52:39.39 -30:29:31.5: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7501 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:24:53.70 -30:20:03.2: 13.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:36:37.18 -29:58:56.2: 14.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:24:53.70 -30:20:03.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2238 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:36:37.18 -29:58:56.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4838 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:07:16.21 -29:15:00.1: 14.24 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:16.21 -29:15:00.1: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6560 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:17:41.28 -29:58:33.7: 14.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:41.28 -29:58:33.7: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5469 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:29:55.14 -29:58:28.0: 14.79 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:29:55.14 -29:58:28.0: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6871 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:02:10.24 -37:05:09.7: 12.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:02:10.24 -37:05:09.7: 12.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:38:14.45 -36:45:19.7: 11.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:10.24 -37:05:09.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5870 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:55:01.16 -34:31:24.0: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:52:27.51 -37:11:47.4: 12.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:55:12.15 -32:18:08.4: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:38:14.45 -36:45:19.7: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:38:14.45 -36:45:19.7: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0272 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:55:01.16 -34:31:24.0: 13.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:01.16 -34:31:24.0: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2644 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:14:40.11 -37:19:08.3: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:48:20.79 -36:51:47.2: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:36:29.35 -38:37:46.3: 12.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:52:27.51 -37:11:47.4: 12.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:52:27.51 -37:11:47.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2465 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:55:12.15 -32:18:08.4: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:55:12.15 -32:18:08.4: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0143 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:14:40.11 -37:19:08.3: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:48:20.79 -36:51:47.2: 10.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:40.11 -37:19:08.3: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4096 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.91 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:48:20.79 -36:51:47.2: ref_mag=9.91 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.7511 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 14:00:56.98 -34:23:25.0: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:33:53.05 -33:43:41.2: 14.37 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:36:29.35 -38:37:46.3: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:36:29.35 -38:37:46.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4003 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 14:00:56.98 -34:23:25.0: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:00:56.98 -34:23:25.0: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.7302 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_02-09-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 13:04:40.51 -29:57:36.0: 12.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:33:53.05 -33:43:41.2: 14.69 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:33:53.05 -33:43:41.2: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.0264 delta=1.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_01-52-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 13:04:40.51 -29:57:36.0: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:04:40.51 -29:57:36.0: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8324 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out23243.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02270.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07543.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08920.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09696.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19435.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42239.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59080_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59080_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59095_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59095_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59096_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59096_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59117_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59117_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:07:50.74 -30:23:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59120_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59120_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59122_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59122_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59127_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59127_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59132_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59132_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:53.09 -38:50:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59133_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59133_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59145_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59145_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:58:10.77 -37:35:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59151_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59151_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59154_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59154_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59157_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59157_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59169_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59169_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:45:22.75 -35:56:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59172_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59172_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:54:18.57 -33:43:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59180_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59180_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:06:42.21 -34:23:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59182_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59182_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:51.98 -35:29:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59190_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59190_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59196_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59196_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:57:03.19 -36:54:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59199_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59199_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:46:16.16 -31:26:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59204_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59204_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59211_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59211_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59215_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59215_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59217_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59217_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59231_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59231_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59237_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 59237_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:39:32.84 -30:46:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04419_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 04419_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:12:02.58 -37:48:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09083_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 09083_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:20:35.52 -36:42:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25511_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 25511_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:23:28.05 -33:10:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07560_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 07560_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50534_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 50534_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:32:12.75 -33:54:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11045_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 11045_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:28:00.38 -36:25:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31346_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 31346_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09696_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 09696_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05905_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 05905_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:51:53.41 -37:36:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50088_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 50088_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42239_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 42239_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07543_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 07543_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30168_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 30168_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:34:54.82 -32:41:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08920_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 08920_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06895_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 06895_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30839_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 30839_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:35:37.05 -29:55:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02270_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 02270_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27966_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 27966_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:53:32.70 -29:05:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19435_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 19435_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23243_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 23243_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:33:53.05 -33:43:41.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.972 6168317823041332480 203.47157499617 -33.72778961851 11.4916 9.8611 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.972#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42497_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 42497_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12941_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 12941_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:57:30.44 -35:53:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23245_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 23245_fd_Cen-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_23-17-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
