This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1426 2461172.6426 11.24 04:56:34.42 +62:52:56.8
147.07143 12.17779 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J045634.39+625256.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.020 V 12.560 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:56:34.42 +62:52:56.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:56:34.42 +62:52:56.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J045634.39+625256.7,2461172.6426,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J045634.39+625256.7 20260512.1426 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1426 2461172.6426 13.47 04:14:55.80 +58:31:14.7
146.94545 5.48612 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0414552+583112
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.895 r Y 3.666 r 2458356.69420 323.248573300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:14:55.80 +58:31:14.7: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:14:55.80 +58:31:14.7: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0414552+583112,2461172.6426,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0414552+583112 20260512.1426 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1426 2461172.6426 13.75 04:16:55.90 +64:34:32.3
142.84235 9.98016 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Gaia DR3 477122797312252928
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.350 G 12.610 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:16:55.90 +64:34:32.3: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:16:55.90 +64:34:32.3: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 477122797312252928,2461172.6426,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 477122797312252928 20260512.1426 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1426 2461172.6426 13.82 04:34:39.18 +60:38:44.1
147.15204 8.75644 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 2071902
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.501 g Y 0.972 g 2451455.16000 115.231135600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:34:39.18 +60:38:44.1: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:34:39.18 +60:38:44.1: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 2071902,2461172.6426,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 2071902 20260512.1426 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1426 2461172.6426 11.90 04:57:04.27 +64:43:57.6
145.58602 13.32997 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in ASASSN-V 1" ASASSN-V J045704.19+644358.2
Type: SR
MeanMag 13.26 m Amp. 0.85 m Period 229.5451647 d
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:57:04.27 +64:43:57.6: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:57:04.27 +64:43:57.6: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6426,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1426 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461172.64287177 12.05.2026 03:25:34.121 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18437
Objects passed selection criteria: 18398
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15791.8
Average stars matched: 15206.8 (96.2955 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:04:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461172.64287177 12.05.2026 03:25:34.121 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 123895
Objects passed selection criteria: 123613
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101458
Average stars matched: 97122.5 (95.7263 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1949972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:07:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.64236892
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 11423 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not found.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 11442 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
Generating wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat from image00001.cat
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out481715.xyls"...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out481713.xyls"...
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:30.834 +62:00:00.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 18487 stars ###
### Converted positions of 18409 stars ###
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky482149.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky482148.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out481713.axy"...
Reading file "./out481715.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 192.497 (3.98318e+83), 19 match, 0 conflict, 36 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (77.1995,61.9995), pixel scale 5.97705 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++--++-+++-----+-+--+--+----+----+---+------------+(best)---------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 194.629 (3.35939e+84), 19 match, 0 conflict, 38 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (77.1961,62.01), pixel scale 5.97772 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-+++--++-----+-+++---------+--+----+--------------+(best)-------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out481713.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out481715.solved to indicate this.
Field: out481715.xyls
Field: out481713.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (77.204924, 61.991410) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:08:49.182, +61:59:29.078).
Field size: 15.799 x 10.5751 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.661 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (77.201523, 62.001882) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:08:48.366, +62:00:06.776).
Field size: 15.7991 x 10.5752 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.661 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> 'fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> 'fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:04 fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:04 out481715.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:04 fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:04 out481713.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits)... done!
Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out481715.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out481713.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out481715.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.745 degrees of RA,Dec (77.1997,62.0011)
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out481713.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.745 degrees of RA,Dec (77.2031,61.9906)
log-odds ratio 194.629 (3.35939e+84), 19 match, 0 conflict, 38 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (77.1961,62.01), pixel scale 5.97772 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-+++--++-----+-+++---------+--+----+--------------+(best)-------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 192.497 (3.98318e+83), 19 match, 0 conflict, 36 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (77.1995,61.9995), pixel scale 5.97705 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++--++-+++-----+-+--+--+----+----+---+------------+(best)---------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out481715.solved to indicate this.
Field: out481715.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (77.201848, 62.003534) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:08:48.444, +62:00:12.721).
Field size: 15.7808 x 10.5796 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.655 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out481713.solved to indicate this.
Field: out481713.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (77.205248, 61.993035) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:08:49.259, +61:59:34.926).
Field size: 15.7806 x 10.5796 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.655 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:04 fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:04 out481715.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:04 fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:04 out481713.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 54819 sources.
simplexy: found 54713 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7461, 955.592] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 99.1397 (1.1372e+43), 22 match, 0 conflict, 411 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2071,61.9938), pixel scale 5.98742 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------------------+-----+---+------+--+-------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----
--> log-odds 99.1397
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 379.542 (6.80904e+164), 45 match, 0 conflict, 404 distractors, 46 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2071,61.9938), pixel scale 5.98742 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-----------+---+--+--+---+------+--+-----------+-----+-++--------+-------+----------+------+-----
Solving...
--> log-odds 379.542
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7469, 955.605] arcmin
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 846.357 (inf), 88 match, 0 conflict, 441 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2071,61.9938), pixel scale 5.98742 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+---+-+---+-+++-+--+--+-+++------++-+--+--+---+-+-----++++--------+---+---+----------+-+---++--+--
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 121.301 (4.78928e+52), 22 match, 0 conflict, 371 distractors, 22 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2037,62.0043), pixel scale 5.9875 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------+-----------------++--+-+--------------------------++-----------+-------------------------
--> log-odds 121.301
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 384.766 (1.26381e+167), 44 match, 0 conflict, 357 distractors, 45 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2037,62.0043), pixel scale 5.9875 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+---+--------+-----++-++--+-+-----------------+---+--+-++-----------++-----+--------+----+----
--> log-odds 846.357
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1743.38 (inf), 177 match, 0 conflict, 376 distractors, 180 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2071,61.9938), pixel scale 5.98742 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++++-++-++++++++-++-+++-+-+--++-+--++++--++++---+++++++---+++-+++++-+-+++---+----+++-+-++++++-
--> log-odds 384.766
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 838.633 (inf), 87 match, 0 conflict, 410 distractors, 89 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2037,62.0043), pixel scale 5.9875 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+-+-++--+-+---+--+----+++-++--+-+---------+-----+-+---+--+-++-+-------+-++-----+--------+----+-+--
--> log-odds 1743.38
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3404.53 (inf), 365 match, 0 conflict, 755 distractors, 371 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2071,61.9938), pixel scale 5.98742 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++++
--> log-odds 838.633
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1734.29 (inf), 176 match, 0 conflict, 345 distractors, 179 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2037,62.0043), pixel scale 5.9875 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++++-+++++-+++-+-++-+++-++-++-++--++++--+-+---+-+--++--++++-++++--+-+-++--++-++-+++-+-+--+-+-+++
--> log-odds 3404.53
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6228.55 (inf), 717 match, 0 conflict, 1527 distractors, 726 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2071,61.9938), pixel scale 5.98742 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 1734.29
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3364.65 (inf), 361 match, 0 conflict, 678 distractors, 370 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2037,62.0043), pixel scale 5.9875 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++++-+++++++++-+++++++++-++-+++++++++++++++-+++-+++
--> log-odds 3364.65
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6157.37 (inf), 710 match, 0 conflict, 1751 distractors, 725 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2037,62.0043), pixel scale 5.9875 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++
--> log-odds 6228.55
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11406.2 (inf), 1428 match, 0 conflict, 3449 distractors, 1451 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2071,61.9938), pixel scale 5.98742 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6157.37
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11276.5 (inf), 1412 match, 0 conflict, 2657 distractors, 1449 index.
RA,Dec = (77.2037,62.0043), pixel scale 5.9875 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11406.2
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (77.205291, 61.993304) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:08:49.270, +61:59:35.896).
Field size: 15.7814 x 10.5735 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.656 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
--> log-odds 11276.5
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (77.201817, 62.003822) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:08:48.436, +62:00:13.759).
Field size: 15.7816 x 10.5736 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.656 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.new"...
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:48.821 +61:59:33.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13339 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky485814.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:47.987 +62:00:10.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13330 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky485938.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:48.821 +61:59:33.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:08:48.821 +61:59:33.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0408 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:47.987 +62:00:10.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:08:47.987 +62:00:10.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:48.821 +61:59:33.08
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:47.987 +62:00:10.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01064 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o0MTSdL5kx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KsJAqj8m36
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QoweYb5AgD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TD4Pxd5xXA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4913 deg
Loaded 14048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8129 out of 8891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8891 out of 18409 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.954200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.954200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4913 deg
Loaded 14048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8129 out of 8891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8891 out of 18409 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0234 to 95.6668 deg, Dec +55.2650 to +67.5032 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0234 to 95.6668 deg, Dec 55.2650 to 67.5032 deg
Loaded 14058 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8140 out of 8894 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8894 out of 18487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.0 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.o0MTSdL5kx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1604, passed=18409
Got 18409 stars (including 16782 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=203 n_q2=253 n_q3=240 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KsJAqj8m36 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1596, passed=18487
Got 18487 stars (including 16865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=193 n_q2=257 n_q3=247 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QoweYb5AgD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=692, passed=13339
Got 13339 stars (including 12642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13339 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=251 n_q2=232 n_q3=247 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.468
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TD4Pxd5xXA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=675, passed=13330
Got 13330 stars (including 12644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13330 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=254 n_q2=229 n_q3=250 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:57:04.25 +64:43:57.8: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:57:04.25 +64:43:57.8: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:04.25 +64:43:57.8: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8796 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21270_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21270_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.12 +66:08:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21456_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21456_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:46.02 +64:26:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21522_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21522_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.11 +57:49:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21639_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21639_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:26.44 +57:03:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21757_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21757_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:43.99 +64:34:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21969_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 21969_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:59.10 +57:53:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14246_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 14246_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04175_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 04175_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.70 +57:38:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09621_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 09621_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:46.05 +62:14:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10918_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 10918_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:18.09 +62:16:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:47.987 +62:00:10.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:48.821 +61:59:33.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:30.834 +62:00:00.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 73319 stars ###
### Converted positions of 73502 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky575026.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky575036.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
### Converted positions of 131449 stars ###
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 130560 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky575210.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky575220.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:48.821 +61:59:33.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:08:48.821 +61:59:33.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0408 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:47.987 +62:00:10.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:08:47.987 +62:00:10.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:48.821 +61:59:33.08
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:47.987 +62:00:10.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01064 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sKIzycmdaC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cZd7mU8waZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YDWuEGjtuF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SPdjBbUBi9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 131449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec +55.1951 to +67.5012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec 55.1951 to 67.5012 deg
Loaded 14165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6817 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 131449 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 131449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec +55.1951 to +67.5012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec 55.1951 to 67.5012 deg
Loaded 14165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6817 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 131449 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 130560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9473 to 95.7081 deg, Dec +55.1950 to +67.5042 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9473 to 95.7081 deg, Dec 55.1950 to 67.5042 deg
Loaded 14177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6855 out of 9006 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9006 out of 130560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 111 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
1.9 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sKIzycmdaC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=12667, passed=131418
Got 131418 stars (including 118531 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 131418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=217 n_q2=245 n_q3=255 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cZd7mU8waZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=12449, passed=130527
Got 130527 stars (including 117847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130527 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=217 n_q2=250 n_q3=255 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YDWuEGjtuF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=4912, passed=73484
Got 73484 stars (including 68491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73484 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=259 n_q2=226 n_q3=253 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.442
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SPdjBbUBi9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4768, passed=73312
Got 73312 stars (including 68454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=256 n_q2=227 n_q3=257 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.386
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-24-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_230208_TTUQ1b1x1_476184_GRkq03jP/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:11:30.80 +58:28:43.3: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:00:09.13 +65:15:42.0: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:56:22.48 +61:29:48.5: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:09:18.94 +63:47:23.4: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:59:38.22 +64:06:25.5: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:11:30.80 +58:28:43.3: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:20:06.71 +58:54:07.0: 13.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:30.80 +58:28:43.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5506 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:00:09.13 +65:15:42.0: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:09.13 +65:15:42.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8545 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:56:22.48 +61:29:48.5: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:22.48 +61:29:48.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1439 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:59:38.22 +64:06:25.5: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:54:52.79 +62:25:26.6: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:38.22 +64:06:25.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3332 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:09:18.94 +63:47:23.4: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:20:06.71 +58:54:07.0: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:18.94 +63:47:23.4: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9565 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:06.71 +58:54:07.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8463 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:16:25.89 +62:57:18.3: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:54:52.79 +62:25:26.6: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:52.79 +62:25:26.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9786 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:16:25.89 +62:57:18.3: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:25.89 +62:57:18.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2606 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:46:33.63 +65:49:16.5: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:46:33.63 +65:49:16.5: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:33.63 +65:49:16.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6794 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:39:46.26 +59:27:24.4: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:44:07.90 +62:21:18.4: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:39:46.26 +59:27:24.4: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:46.26 +59:27:24.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9422 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:17:16.56 +59:28:04.0: 14.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:44:07.90 +62:21:18.4: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:07.90 +62:21:18.4: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9536 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:17:16.56 +59:28:04.0: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:16.56 +59:28:04.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8891 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:44:09.60 +60:48:55.7: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:15:10.28 +57:20:06.8: 15.74 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:44:09.60 +60:48:55.7: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:09.60 +60:48:55.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0892 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:15:10.28 +57:20:06.8: 15.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:56:34.42 +62:52:56.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:15:10.28 +57:20:06.8: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3287 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:56:34.42 +62:52:56.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:56:34.42 +62:52:56.8: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2414 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:02:38.16 +62:18:19.0: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:14:55.80 +58:31:14.7: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:02:38.16 +62:18:19.0: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:16:55.90 +64:34:32.3: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:34:39.18 +60:38:44.1: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.16 +62:18:19.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8431 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:14:55.80 +58:31:14.7: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:14:55.80 +58:31:14.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4645 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:16:55.90 +64:34:32.3: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:16:55.90 +64:34:32.3: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7467 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:34:39.18 +60:38:44.1: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:34:39.18 +60:38:44.1: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8153 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:57:04.27 +64:43:57.6: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:57:04.27 +64:43:57.6: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:57:04.27 +64:43:57.6: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9048 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:36:34.47 +57:24:08.4: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:36:34.47 +57:24:08.4: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:34.47 +57:24:08.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3521 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out157816.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113210.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43617.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61241.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152422_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152422_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152425_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152425_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:49.51 +61:37:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152428_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152428_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152431_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152431_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152432_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152432_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.56 +61:30:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152438_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152438_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152440_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152440_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152443_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152443_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:03.54 +65:16:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152444_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152444_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:23.90 +57:32:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152446_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152446_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:45.04 +66:03:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152449_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152449_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:34.07 +60:57:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152450_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152450_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152451_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152451_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:38.78 +65:47:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152452_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152452_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152455_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152455_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:55.69 +60:27:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152457_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152457_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:40.72 +59:31:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152458_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152458_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152465_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152465_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:16.45 +66:35:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152468_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152468_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:16.38 +63:45:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152470_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152470_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:21.78 +59:35:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152660_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152660_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.14 +66:08:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152885_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 152885_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:21.17 +58:57:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153315_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 153315_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:28.60 +61:27:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153706_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 153706_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:27.78 +62:27:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153717_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 153717_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:34.86 +59:25:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153819_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 153819_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:07.89 +66:49:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153820_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 153820_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:55.79 +58:48:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153857_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 153857_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:17.22 +62:42:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153858_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 153858_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:13.87 +58:05:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153895_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 153895_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:12.46 +64:37:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154081_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154081_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:53.07 +62:17:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154171_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154171_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:06.26 +58:58:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154175_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154175_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:23.87 +56:58:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154485_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154485_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:32.08 +61:17:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154531_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154531_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:32.87 +59:38:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154585_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154585_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:12.60 +61:09:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154634_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154634_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:52.43 +63:07:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154649_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154649_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:01.83 +63:23:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154662_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154662_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.76 +64:17:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154835_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154835_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.61 +62:13:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154954_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 154954_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:26.46 +62:03:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155197_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155197_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:24.01 +57:53:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155211_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155211_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:20.83 +60:48:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155252_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155252_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:58.98 +65:46:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155280_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155280_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:23.68 +63:12:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155466_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155466_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:24.41 +61:02:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155482_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155482_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:38.63 +59:31:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155490_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155490_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:46.55 +62:12:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155549_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155549_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155621_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155621_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:24.73 +63:58:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155839_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155839_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:53.70 +57:09:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155842_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155842_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:17.57 +58:45:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155858_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 155858_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:16.83 +61:12:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156054_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156054_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:26.04 +60:20:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156057_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156057_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.90 +57:49:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156061_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156061_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:00.95 +58:12:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156142_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156142_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:07.91 +60:53:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156169_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156169_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:20.47 +65:47:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156202_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156202_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:58.36 +63:06:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156213_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156213_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:22.70 +56:57:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156239_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156239_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:23.06 +59:49:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156337_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156337_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:23.70 +59:02:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156375_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156375_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:11.80 +63:57:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156386_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156386_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156388_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156388_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:22.78 +60:03:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156394_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156394_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:07.00 +60:17:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156456_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156456_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:55.51 +58:20:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156489_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156489_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:51.04 +63:58:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156507_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156507_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:09.68 +60:10:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156522_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156522_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:37.51 +61:30:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156542_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156542_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156544_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156544_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:03.08 +66:27:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156568_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156568_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156679_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156679_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:23.17 +67:08:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156740_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156740_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:35.69 +60:47:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156783_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156783_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:53.73 +58:21:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156806_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156806_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:40.57 +58:53:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156836_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156836_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:23.65 +57:49:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156870_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156870_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:03.19 +63:28:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156902_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156902_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:44.50 +64:09:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156936_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156936_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:45.91 +61:35:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157017_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157017_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:50.97 +59:40:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157024_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157024_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:15.28 +57:53:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157070_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157070_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:51.63 +62:45:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157316_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157316_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:36.59 +59:49:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157323_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157323_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:54.79 +65:17:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157518_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157518_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:21.64 +65:57:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157679_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157679_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157697_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157697_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:36.68 +65:29:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157816_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 157816_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:10.28 +57:20:06.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.158 280124849449412352 078.79340146844 +57.33512497584 12.9018 11.3138 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.158#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32261_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 32261_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:33.92 +59:13:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82596_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 82596_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17362_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 17362_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.17 +57:44:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124534_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 124534_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.87 +64:14:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114638_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 114638_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:44.02 +64:34:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35828_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 35828_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:31.02 +59:02:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73386_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 73386_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:29.08 +62:29:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121037_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 121037_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:46.00 +64:26:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122123_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 122123_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43617_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 43617_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29771_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 29771_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.71 +57:38:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92395_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 92395_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:52.10 +63:15:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81854_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 81854_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:18.13 +62:16:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129906_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 129906_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61241_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 61241_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103232_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 103232_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:39.03 +62:33:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109716_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 109716_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:50.81 +64:52:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113210_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 113210_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71135_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 71135_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:46.06 +62:14:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19139_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 19139_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28304_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 28304_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-25-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
