This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,7.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 7.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,7.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 7.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.9286+22.1603,2461172.6474,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.9286+22.1603 20260512.1474 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1474 2461172.6474 13.41 07:17:48.77 +22:18:24.0
195.45508 15.52287 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 1 1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:48.77 +22:18:24.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:48.77 +22:18:24.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1474 2461172.6474 13.57 07:37:23.33 +22:52:19.9
196.73639 19.90992 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:23.33 +22:52:19.9: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:23.33 +22:52:19.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1474 2461172.6474 13.71 07:32:55.11 +17:55:06.5
201.12094 17.02103 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 0 2 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:55.11 +17:55:06.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:55.11 +17:55:06.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1474 2461172.6474 14.00 07:35:35.48 +22:52:47.7
196.56406 19.52891 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 1 -0 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:35.48 +22:52:47.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:35.48 +22:52:47.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,14.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 14.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1474 2461172.6474 14.04 07:40:11.39 +20:43:38.8
199.10808 19.70124 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 0 2 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:11.39 +20:43:38.8: 15.96 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:11.39 +20:43:38.8: 15.81 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.87 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1474 2461172.6474 14.75 07:35:27.16 +22:09:29.9
197.25962 19.22690 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.382 Dodona 0 0 0 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:27.16 +22:09:29.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:27.16 +22:09:29.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,14.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 14.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1474 2461172.6474 14.65 07:39:31.28 +21:13:22.0
198.55842 19.74587 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.334 Chicago -4 3 5 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:31.28 +21:13:22.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:31.28 +21:13:22.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1474 2461172.6474 14.73 07:39:22.28 +25:21:05.2
194.44799 21.23716 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.143 Adria -0 1 1 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:22.28 +25:21:05.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:22.28 +25:21:05.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6474,7.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1474 7.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461172.64761850 12.05.2026 03:32:24.238 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14037
Objects passed selection criteria: 14016
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14201.8
Average stars matched: 13035 (91.7845 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122668 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 22:43:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461172.64761850 12.05.2026 03:32:24.238 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 65 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 98039
Objects passed selection criteria: 97835
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97965
Average stars matched: 89681 (91.5439 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1903168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 22:46:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.64715573
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 129: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 14762 high-SNR stars for plate solving
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 14791 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3198140.xyls"...
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3198138.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 22550 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3198533.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 23656 stars ###
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3198467.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3198140.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3198138.axy"...
log-odds ratio 26.1951 (2.37886e+11), 9 match, 0 conflict, 34 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.835,21.9759), pixel scale 5.93219 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------------+---+-+--+--+-----+-----+---+-+(best)--+-----+------------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3198140.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 26.2351 (2.47607e+11), 11 match, 0 conflict, 41 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.842,21.9783), pixel scale 5.93222 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------------+---+-+--+--+-----+-----+-----+--++----+(best)------------------------------------------------
Field: out3198140.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.813073, 21.971271) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:15.138, +21:58:16.574).
Field size: 15.7381 x 10.5309 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.232 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3198138.solved to indicate this.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:43 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:43 out3198140.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits)... done!
Field: out3198138.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.820235, 21.973807) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:16.856, +21:58:25.706).
Field size: 15.7379 x 10.5308 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.235 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:43 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:43 out3198138.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3198140.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3198140.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6667 degrees of RA,Dec (110.812,21.9704)
log-odds ratio 134.025 (1.60774e+58), 16 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.812,21.971), pixel scale 5.95152 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-++--++++-+--+---+----+-+++(best)--------------------------------------------------------------------
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3198140.solved to indicate this.
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3198138.xyls"...
Field: out3198140.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.814213, 21.970721) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:15.411, +21:58:14.594).
Field size: 15.7152 x 10.5339 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.227 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:43 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:43 out3198140.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits)... done!
done!
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3198138.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6667 degrees of RA,Dec (110.819,21.973)
log-odds ratio 133.861 (1.36441e+58), 16 match, 0 conflict, 15 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.82,21.9736), pixel scale 5.95153 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++-++--++++-+----+-+--+-+-++(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3198138.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3198138.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.821400, 21.973261) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:17.136, +21:58:23.740).
Field size: 15.7149 x 10.5339 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.229 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:43 fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:43 out3198138.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits)... done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 66625 sources.
simplexy: found 66843 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4957, 951.839] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 24.2777 (3.49687e+10), 4 match, 0 conflict, 25 distractors, 12 index.
RA,Dec = (110.815,21.9716), pixel scale 5.96391 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+---------+----------++(best)-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4951, 951.831] arcmin
--> log-odds 24.2777
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.24787
log-odds ratio 76.2066 (1.24775e+33), 24 match, 0 conflict, 633 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.815,21.9716), pixel scale 5.96391 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------++--------+----------++-----------------------+------+------++------------------------------+-
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 82.5539 (7.12356e+35), 11 match, 0 conflict, 57 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (110.822,21.9741), pixel scale 5.96385 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+---+----------------+---+------+------+-+---++---------+-------+(best)--------------------------------
--> log-odds 76.2066
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 304.9 (2.60791e+132), 43 match, 0 conflict, 638 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.815,21.9716), pixel scale 5.96391 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+--++--+---+-+---------+++-----------------------+-----++--+---++-----------------+------------++
--> log-odds 82.5539
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 286.896 (3.95611e+124), 42 match, 0 conflict, 679 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (110.822,21.9741), pixel scale 5.96385 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--+--+---+---------+--++------+------+-+---++----+----+-------+---------+---------------+------
--> log-odds 304.9
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 716.861 (inf), 83 match, 0 conflict, 598 distractors, 88 index.
RA,Dec = (110.815,21.9716), pixel scale 5.96391 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+--++--++--+-+---------+++------+-------++-+---+-+-+--+++--+---++--------------++-+--+---------+-
--> log-odds 286.896
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 694.973 (6.65032e+301), 82 match, 0 conflict, 639 distractors, 88 index.
RA,Dec = (110.822,21.9741), pixel scale 5.96385 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--++-+---+---------+--+++-+---+------+-+-+-++----+--+++-------+-------+-+-----+-------+-+--+---
--> log-odds 716.861
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
--> log-odds 694.973
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1638.89 (inf), 177 match, 0 conflict, 504 distractors, 187 index.
RA,Dec = (110.815,21.9716), pixel scale 5.96391 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+--+++++++++-++--+---+-++++--+-++-++-+-+++-++-++-+-++-++++++---+++------+------++-++-+--+--+++-++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1662.85 (inf), 179 match, 0 conflict, 542 distractors, 186 index.
RA,Dec = (110.822,21.9741), pixel scale 5.96385 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--++++-+-+-+---++--++-+++++---+++--+-+++-++++++++++++++------+++-----++-+---+++-------+-+--+--+
--> log-odds 1638.89
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3225.1 (inf), 354 match, 0 conflict, 861 distractors, 370 index.
RA,Dec = (110.815,21.9716), pixel scale 5.96391 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+++++++++++++++++++--++++++++-+++++-+++++++++++++-+-+++++++++++-+++--+++++-+++++++++++++-++-++++++
--> log-odds 1662.85
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3268.54 (inf), 357 match, 0 conflict, 507 distractors, 369 index.
RA,Dec = (110.822,21.9741), pixel scale 5.96385 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-+++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++-+++++++-++++++++++++++-+-++-++++-++-++-+-+-++++-+++-++-++++-++
--> log-odds 3225.1
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5810.66 (inf), 687 match, 1 conflict, 1136 distractors, 736 index.
RA,Dec = (110.815,21.9716), pixel scale 5.96391 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++--++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++
--> log-odds 3268.54
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5925.87 (inf), 700 match, 1 conflict, 1394 distractors, 735 index.
RA,Dec = (110.822,21.9741), pixel scale 5.96385 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++
--> log-odds 5810.66
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
--> log-odds 5925.87
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10706.5 (inf), 1374 match, 0 conflict, 2778 distractors, 1457 index.
RA,Dec = (110.815,21.9716), pixel scale 5.96391 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10761.1 (inf), 1377 match, 0 conflict, 2319 distractors, 1454 index.
RA,Dec = (110.822,21.9741), pixel scale 5.96385 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10761.1
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.821185, 21.973393) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:17.084, +21:58:24.214).
Field size: 15.7144 x 10.5301 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.234 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.new"...
--> log-odds 10706.5
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.814000, 21.970859) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:15.360, +21:58:15.094).
Field size: 15.7146 x 10.5302 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.231 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:16.873 +21:58:21.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:15.148 +21:58:12.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15440 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3211159.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
### Converted positions of 15401 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3211163.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:16.873 +21:58:21.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:16.873 +21:58:21.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0868 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:15.148 +21:58:12.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:15.148 +21:58:12.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0811 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:16.873 +21:58:21.19
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:15.148 +21:58:12.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00713 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e5uQBajdJR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.moLimYHT4e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.toIZXqi6p0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0YDUreOHNK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.e5uQBajdJR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=221 n_q2=248 n_q3=257 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.moLimYHT4e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=167 n_q2=274 n_q3=215 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.toIZXqi6p0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1082, passed=15440
Got 15440 stars (including 14352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15440 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.732 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.740 n_q1=194 n_q2=285 n_q3=197 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0YDUreOHNK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1067, passed=15401
Got 15401 stars (including 14325 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15401 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.750 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=195 n_q2=282 n_q3=201 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:33.20 +21:20:40.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:33.20 +21:20:40.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:33.20 +21:20:40.5: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2645 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 34568_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:54.92 +24:41:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:57.71 +21:48:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34639_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 34639_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.40 +23:26:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:15.148 +21:58:12.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:16.873 +21:58:21.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 92485 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3251056.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
### Converted positions of 92713 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3251082.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
### Converted positions of 151496 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3251504.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
### Converted positions of 153680 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3251540.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:16.873 +21:58:21.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:16.873 +21:58:21.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0868 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:15.148 +21:58:12.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:15.148 +21:58:12.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0811 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:16.873 +21:58:21.19
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:15.148 +21:58:12.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00713 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vEdu3UHj3B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mfy8vFLY8j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z9zMrjXT6B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x5ehCPWLGn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vEdu3UHj3B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=234 n_q2=237 n_q3=245 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mfy8vFLY8j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=183 n_q2=265 n_q3=224 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z9zMrjXT6B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=8494, passed=92693
Got 92693 stars (including 84109 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.743 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.659 n_q1=210 n_q2=261 n_q3=233 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x5ehCPWLGn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=8316, passed=92468
Got 92468 stars (including 84066 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92468 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.751 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.628 n_q1=209 n_q2=269 n_q3=229 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_223616_TTUQ2b1x1_2890019_tHKsXkVX/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:46.00 +24:13:29.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:06.07 +25:00:55.9: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:21.48 +23:49:16.7: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:30.17 +17:57:16.8: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:58.84 +21:31:28.1: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:21.29 +18:08:00.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:42.41 +24:17:01.5: 14.68 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:05.12 +21:26:55.8: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:06.07 +25:00:55.9: 14.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:46.00 +24:13:29.4: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:21.48 +23:49:16.7: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:42.41 +24:17:01.5: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:58.84 +21:31:28.1: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:30.17 +17:57:16.8: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:46.00 +24:13:29.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5182 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:21.29 +18:08:00.1: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:06.07 +25:00:55.9: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7973 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:21.48 +23:49:16.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5155 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:58.84 +21:31:28.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4759 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:42.41 +24:17:01.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7290 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:21.29 +18:08:00.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2153 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:05.12 +21:26:55.8: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:30.17 +17:57:16.8: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4542 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:14.4: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:05.12 +21:26:55.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9336 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:14.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:44.94 +21:03:14.4: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3229 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:29.45 +18:40:30.3: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:09.97 +23:48:42.1: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:29.45 +18:40:30.3: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:29.45 +18:40:30.3: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7695 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:09.97 +23:48:42.1: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:09.97 +23:48:42.1: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7614 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:31.36 +22:07:20.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:48.77 +22:18:24.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:23.33 +22:52:19.9: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:31.36 +22:07:20.3: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:31.36 +22:07:20.3: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1966 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:48.77 +22:18:24.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:23.33 +22:52:19.9: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:36.59 +23:32:16.3: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:36.59 +23:32:16.3: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:25.72 +18:02:23.5: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:36.59 +23:32:16.3: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6117 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:55.11 +17:55:06.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:25.72 +18:02:23.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:25.72 +18:02:23.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6526 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:55.11 +17:55:06.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:33.11 +20:12:13.7: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.11 +20:12:13.7: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.11 +20:12:13.7: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8496 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:10.02 +20:25:04.7: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:27.11 +18:09:09.4: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:10.02 +20:25:04.7: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:10.02 +20:25:04.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0326 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:35.48 +22:52:47.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:27.11 +18:09:09.4: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:27.11 +18:09:09.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9383 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:19.92 +18:22:40.2: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:35.48 +22:52:47.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:19.92 +18:22:40.2: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:19.92 +18:22:40.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0274 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:11.39 +20:43:38.8: 15.96 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:11.39 +20:43:38.8: 15.81 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.87 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:40:11.39 +20:43:38.8: ref_mag=15.87 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.0311 delta=1.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.21 +19:51:30.9: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:25.57 +21:29:26.0: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.21 +19:51:30.9: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.21 +19:51:30.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9244 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:25.57 +21:29:26.0: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:25.57 +21:29:26.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1414 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:42.30 +20:50:43.5: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:41.81 +23:18:55.5: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:42.30 +20:50:43.5: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:18.61 +22:03:21.8: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:42.30 +20:50:43.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0570 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:41.81 +23:18:55.5: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:41.81 +23:18:55.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0880 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:50.30 +21:15:36.8: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:18.61 +22:03:21.8: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:18.61 +22:03:21.8: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1696 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:50.30 +21:15:36.8: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:50.30 +21:15:36.8: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1921 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:49.10 +20:17:54.0: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:22.41 +25:01:53.1: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:13.34 +21:02:57.0: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:49.10 +20:17:54.0: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:49.10 +20:17:54.0: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1962 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:06.66 +19:49:24.3: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:03.63 +23:22:58.9: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:13.34 +21:02:57.0: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:13.34 +21:02:57.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3374 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:36:29.28 +18:19:45.3: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:22.41 +25:01:53.1: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:22.41 +25:01:53.1: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3356 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:03.63 +23:22:58.9: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:03.63 +23:22:58.9: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4338 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:06.66 +19:49:24.3: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:06.66 +19:49:24.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5895 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:29.28 +18:19:45.3: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:29.28 +18:19:45.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4339 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:43.4: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:21.94 +24:02:44.2: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:43.4: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:25.74 +21:22:43.4: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3219 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:27.16 +22:09:29.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:07.08 +23:54:54.8: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:21.94 +24:02:44.2: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:21.94 +24:02:44.2: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6626 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:31.28 +21:13:22.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:07.08 +23:54:54.8: 14.83 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:07.08 +23:54:54.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5661 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:51.34 +21:22:28.8: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:27.16 +22:09:29.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:31.28 +21:13:22.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:51.34 +21:22:28.8: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:51.34 +21:22:28.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6415 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:22.28 +25:21:05.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:45.85 +24:39:28.7: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:32.53 +20:15:46.6: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:22.28 +25:21:05.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:45.85 +24:39:28.7: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:45.85 +24:39:28.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9285 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:32.53 +20:15:46.6: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:32.53 +20:15:46.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7866 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195741.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195787.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195861.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196122.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196211.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195461_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195461_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195471_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195471_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195476_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195476_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:21.59 +18:59:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195485_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195485_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195488_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195488_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195504_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195504_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:25.65 +17:43:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195530_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195530_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:01.81 +19:06:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195535_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195535_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195536_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195536_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 195538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195597_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195597_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.26 +24:07:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195614_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195614_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.13 +22:38:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195631_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195631_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:56.30 +24:55:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 195635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195640_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195640_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.36 +25:56:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195652_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195652_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.76 +23:56:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195676_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195676_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.65 +22:17:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195681_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195681_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.31 +24:32:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.82 +18:51:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195696_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195696_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.43 +21:31:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195697_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195697_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.16 +18:14:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195708_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195708_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.35 +21:47:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195710_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195710_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195722_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195722_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.51 +20:30:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195741_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 195741_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195743_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195743_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.46 +20:05:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195745_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 195745_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195746_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195746_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.63 +20:31:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195749_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195749_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.57 +22:40:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195756_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195756_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:31.47 +25:24:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195762_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195762_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.80 +19:56:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195767_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195767_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.27 +24:08:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.57 +19:09:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 195787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195792_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195792_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:51.55 +24:24:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195795_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195795_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.76 +21:28:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195814_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195814_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.79 +20:49:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195830_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195830_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.03 +25:27:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:41.01 +22:08:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195835_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195835_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.45 +19:03:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195836_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195836_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:27.69 +22:47:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195851_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195857_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195857_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195858_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195858_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.69 +25:49:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 195861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195865_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195865_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195869_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195869_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.42 +18:53:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195871_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 195871_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195894_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195894_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.51 +20:49:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195896_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195896_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.77 +23:02:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195903_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195903_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:43.77 +24:30:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195904_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195904_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195905_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195905_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.80 +21:21:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195906_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195906_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.20 +21:13:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195907_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195907_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195908_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195908_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.96 +21:26:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:39.32 +25:20:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195916_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195919_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195919_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195924_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195924_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195928_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195928_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:14.25 +19:32:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195929_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195929_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.68 +25:44:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195930_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:38.54 +26:01:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.11 +21:35:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195934_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195934_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:16.51 +20:14:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:49.48 +17:39:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195942_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195942_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.11 +22:26:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195948_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195948_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.81 +17:52:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195953_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195953_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:24.32 +24:47:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:46.38 +20:58:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195979_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195979_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195996_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 195996_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:22.87 +19:59:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196004_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196004_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:31.07 +25:14:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196015_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196015_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196028_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196028_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196056_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196056_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196069_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196069_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:06.47 +23:49:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196072_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196072_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196087_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196087_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196088_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196088_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196118_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196118_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 196122_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196159_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196159_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:26.66 +17:57:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196184_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 196184_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196188_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196188_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:15.89 +18:11:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196207_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196207_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196211_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 196211_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196214_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196214_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 196256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-32-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
