This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1465 2461172.6465 13.05 07:01:42.15 +26:57:13.3
189.53938 14.01657 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 3 -1 3 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:42.15 +26:57:13.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:42.15 +26:57:13.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6465,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1465 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1465 2461172.6465 13.51 07:07:59.40 +32:15:25.7
185.00053 17.31812 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.98 Ianthe 2 -1 2 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:59.40 +32:15:25.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:59.40 +32:15:25.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6465,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1465 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1465 2461172.6465 12.73 06:42:01.76 +31:18:06.9
183.66790 11.87024 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in ASASSN-V 3" ASASSN-V J064201.52+311806.9
Type: SR
MeanMag 14.06 m Amp. 0.6 m Period 95.0 d
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:01.76 +31:18:06.9: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:01.76 +31:18:06.9: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6465,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1465 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1465 2461172.6465 12.36 07:19:12.40 +26:47:37.6
191.26683 17.55193 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J071912+2647.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.880 V Y 0.660 V 2453047.30000 136.066198000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:19:12.40 +26:47:37.6: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:19:12.40 +26:47:37.6: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J071912+2647.6,2461172.6465,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J071912+2647.6 20260512.1465 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461172.64670715 12.05.2026 03:31:05.498 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21049
Objects passed selection criteria: 20947
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15696
Average stars matched: 14627.8 (93.1941 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 124324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 22:41:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461172.64670715 12.05.2026 03:31:05.498 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 191
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 73 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 148628
Objects passed selection criteria: 148221
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 112518
Average stars matched: 104124 (92.5394 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1910952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 22:45:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.64623132
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits .... No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Choosing aperture...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits was not found.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 14848 high-SNR stars for plate solving
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 14851 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Generating wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3149284.xyls"...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3149286.xyls"...
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:03.050 +30:00:19.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 24037 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3149674.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 24243 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3149665.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3149284.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3149286.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 422.896 (4.58449e+183), 45 match, 0 conflict, 44 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (105.127,29.9868), pixel scale 5.95402 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-+++++++++++-+++++++-+++-++--+-+-+-+-++--+-+--++-+--+-++-----+--------------------+(best)-----------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3149284.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field: out3149284.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.083412, 29.987110) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:20.019, +29:59:13.595).
Field size: 15.7337 x 10.5315 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.18 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
log-odds ratio 422.36 (2.6831e+183), 45 match, 0 conflict, 50 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (105.121,29.9928), pixel scale 5.95406 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-+++++++++++-+++++-+-+++-++-++++-+-+-+---+-++----+--++++-----+--------------------------+(best)-----
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3149286.solved to indicate this.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:41 fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:41 out3149284.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits)... done!
Field: out3149286.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.077720, 29.993001) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:18.653, +29:59:34.804).
Field size: 15.7339 x 10.5316 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.177 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:41 fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:41 out3149286.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3149284.xyls"...
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits (fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3149284.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6633 degrees of RA,Dec (105.082,29.9863)
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3149286.xyls"...
log-odds ratio 218.949 (1.22583e+95), 21 match, 0 conflict, 17 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (105.079,29.993), pixel scale 5.95258 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++++++++++---++-+-+-+++----------+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3149284.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3149284.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.083006, 29.987070) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:19.921, +29:59:13.452).
Field size: 15.7186 x 10.5347 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.176 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:41 fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:41 out3149284.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits)... done!
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
done!
Reading file "./out3149286.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6633 degrees of RA,Dec (105.077,29.9922)
log-odds ratio 219.04 (1.34258e+95), 21 match, 0 conflict, 17 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (105.073,29.9988), pixel scale 5.95261 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++++++++---++-+-+-+++----------+(best)--------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3149286.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3149286.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.077280, 29.992975) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:18.547, +29:59:34.712).
Field size: 15.7186 x 10.5346 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.172 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:41 fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:41 out3149286.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 69555 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4727, 951.494] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 31.9564 (7.55963e+13), 3 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 11 index.
RA,Dec = (105.084,29.9879), pixel scale 5.96174 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+----+--+(best)-----------------------+---------------------------------------------+----+---------------
simplexy: found 69711 sources.
--> log-odds 31.9564
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 136.475 (1.86307e+59), 24 match, 0 conflict, 420 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (105.084,29.9879), pixel scale 5.96174 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+----+--+-----------------------+--------------------------------+----------+-+--+-+-+-------------
--> log-odds 136.475
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 410.236 (1.4564e+178), 49 match, 0 conflict, 507 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (105.084,29.9879), pixel scale 5.96174 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+-++-+---+----+--------+-----+---------++--------------------++-+--------+-+--+++-+--------+----
--> log-odds 410.236
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 822.418 (inf), 92 match, 0 conflict, 653 distractors, 94 index.
RA,Dec = (105.084,29.9879), pixel scale 5.96174 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++++-+---+----+--------+-----++-+------++--------+----+----+-++-+------+++-+--+++-+--++---++---+
--> log-odds 822.418
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1785.03 (inf), 192 match, 0 conflict, 561 distractors, 200 index.
RA,Dec = (105.084,29.9879), pixel scale 5.96174 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++++-++--+++--+--+-+---++---+++-+----+-++--+-+++-+----+-+-+++++-+-+-+--+++-+--+++-++-++-+-+++--+
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4736, 951.508] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 108.038 (8.32449e+46), 24 match, 0 conflict, 420 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (105.078,29.9938), pixel scale 5.96183 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------+------------------+--+---------------------+-----------+------+-+-----------+-----+--
--> log-odds 108.038
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 371.531 (2.25956e+161), 48 match, 0 conflict, 508 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (105.078,29.9938), pixel scale 5.96183 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+------+----+------+-+----+--+-----++--------------+-------+-+-+------+++---+---+---+-----+--
--> log-odds 1785.03
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3162.28 (inf), 357 match, 0 conflict, 818 distractors, 383 index.
RA,Dec = (105.084,29.9879), pixel scale 5.96174 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-++-++++--+-+++++++++++++++-+--+++-+++++-+++-+-+-++-+++++++-+-++++++++-++-+++-++-+++++++++-+
--> log-odds 371.531
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 780.764 (inf), 90 match, 0 conflict, 647 distractors, 94 index.
RA,Dec = (105.078,29.9938), pixel scale 5.96183 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+------+----++-----+-+----+--+-----++-+---+--+--+--+-------+-+-+---++-+++---++-++-+-+-----+-+
--> log-odds 780.764
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1721.85 (inf), 187 match, 0 conflict, 558 distractors, 200 index.
RA,Dec = (105.078,29.9938), pixel scale 5.96183 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---++++-+-+-+++---++--+-++-+---++--+--+-+++++---++-+-+++-+++--++-+-+++---++++++--+++-++++-+--++-+-+
--> log-odds 3162.28
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5669.02 (inf), 673 match, 1 conflict, 1158 distractors, 728 index.
RA,Dec = (105.084,29.9879), pixel scale 5.96174 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++--++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++++++++
--> log-odds 1721.85
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3189.11 (inf), 360 match, 1 conflict, 959 distractors, 383 index.
RA,Dec = (105.078,29.9938), pixel scale 5.96183 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++++++-++++++-+++-++-++-+++++++-++-+-++++++++++-+++++++++--++++-+++++-++++++--++++++++-+-+++++++
--> log-odds 3189.11
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5671.29 (inf), 674 match, 1 conflict, 1404 distractors, 727 index.
RA,Dec = (105.078,29.9938), pixel scale 5.96183 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++
--> log-odds 5669.02
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10332.6 (inf), 1321 match, 1 conflict, 1366 distractors, 1444 index.
RA,Dec = (105.084,29.9879), pixel scale 5.96174 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5671.29
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10372 (inf), 1335 match, 2 conflict, 2471 distractors, 1441 index.
RA,Dec = (105.078,29.9938), pixel scale 5.96183 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++
--> log-odds 10332.6
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.083055, 29.987283) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:19.933, +29:59:14.219).
Field size: 15.716 x 10.53 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.182 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:19.707 +29:59:11.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15492 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3182591.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
--> log-odds 10372
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.077354, 29.993189) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:18.565, +29:59:35.480).
Field size: 15.7161 x 10.53 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.18 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:18.339 +29:59:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15465 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3183673.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:19.707 +29:59:11.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:19.707 +29:59:11.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0704 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:18.339 +29:59:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:18.339 +29:59:32.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0650 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:19.707 +29:59:11.20
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:18.339 +29:59:32.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00770 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JG2HNXm8w5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QcGwjhZ8Ai
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AOpF0U8B35
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nSBhSHIOLk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.903500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.903500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JG2HNXm8w5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=224 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QcGwjhZ8Ai (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=224 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AOpF0U8B35 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1005, passed=15492
Got 15492 stars (including 14477 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.806 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.845 n_q1=208 n_q2=282 n_q3=201 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.401
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nSBhSHIOLk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1037, passed=15465
Got 15465 stars (including 14418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15465 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.793 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.839 n_q1=208 n_q2=285 n_q3=198 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32266_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 32266_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:40.83 +27:59:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32953_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 32953_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.56 +33:55:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33071_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 33071_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.65 +33:41:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.19 +30:16:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.40 +27:57:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
The guess is 573 arcmin.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:19.707 +29:59:11.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:18.339 +29:59:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:03.050 +30:00:19.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 98307 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3237809.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
### Converted positions of 97900 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3237808.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
### Converted positions of 167542 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3237991.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
### Converted positions of 166985 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3238001.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:19.707 +29:59:11.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:19.707 +29:59:11.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0704 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:18.339 +29:59:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:18.339 +29:59:32.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0650 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:19.707 +29:59:11.20
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:18.339 +29:59:32.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00770 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nX2zQUepd1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9yVA6zWUlP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0R4tUPaubM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n47MXowj9f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 159 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nX2zQUepd1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=20873, passed=167504
Got 167504 stars (including 146353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=226 n_q2=248 n_q3=236 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9yVA6zWUlP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=20907, passed=166940
Got 166940 stars (including 145746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=221 n_q2=245 n_q3=238 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0R4tUPaubM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=8745, passed=97875
Got 97875 stars (including 89018 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.780 n_q1=220 n_q2=273 n_q3=224 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.373
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n47MXowj9f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=8949, passed=98291
Got 98291 stars (including 89224 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98291 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.735 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=223 n_q2=276 n_q3=220 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_223417_TTUQ2b1x1_2831774_R2EWQETs/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:59.78 +28:06:29.2: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:03.32 +26:14:56.6: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:50.04 +28:58:34.7: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:12:34.11 +31:30:39.3: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:03.32 +26:14:56.6: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:59.78 +28:06:29.2: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:03.32 +26:14:56.6: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3257 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:50.04 +28:58:34.7: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:59.78 +28:06:29.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9901 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:50.04 +28:58:34.7: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3771 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:12:34.11 +31:30:39.3: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:34.11 +31:30:39.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1585 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:57.06 +27:42:21.4: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:57.06 +27:42:21.4: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:57.06 +27:42:21.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2839 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:10.98 +25:37:23.1: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:10.98 +25:37:23.1: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:10.98 +25:37:23.1: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5387 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:28.53 +31:28:02.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:42.15 +26:57:13.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:28.53 +31:28:02.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:28.53 +31:28:02.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0522 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:42.15 +26:57:13.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:59.40 +32:15:25.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:59.40 +32:15:25.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:34.19 +26:14:36.7: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:04:21.28 +32:16:55.9: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:03.37 +27:09:21.5: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:44:31.01 +29:00:19.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:34.19 +26:14:36.7: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:34.19 +26:14:36.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4647 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:04:21.28 +32:16:55.9: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:21.28 +32:16:55.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8777 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:44:31.01 +29:00:19.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:03.37 +27:09:21.5: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:31.01 +29:00:19.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5075 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:03.37 +27:09:21.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9273 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:24.98 +33:29:48.0: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:15:50.23 +27:27:32.2: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:20:29.12 +26:43:11.6: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:24.98 +33:29:48.0: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:24.98 +33:29:48.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9868 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:15:50.23 +27:27:32.2: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:50.23 +27:27:32.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9766 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:20:29.12 +26:43:11.6: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:29.12 +26:43:11.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0364 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:13:05.98 +33:38:27.4: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:33.33 +26:31:24.5: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:16:15.18 +31:43:16.3: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:13:05.98 +33:38:27.4: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:05.98 +33:38:27.4: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0219 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:33.33 +26:31:24.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:33.33 +26:31:24.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9622 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:16:15.18 +31:43:16.3: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:15.18 +31:43:16.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0021 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:06.10 +29:53:50.5: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:06.10 +29:53:50.5: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:06.10 +29:53:50.5: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0244 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:27.96 +30:58:47.7: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:27.96 +30:58:47.7: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:27.96 +30:58:47.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1221 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:04:24.95 +32:17:00.3: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:04:24.95 +32:17:00.3: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:24.95 +32:17:00.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2081 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:05:59.66 +28:34:00.8: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:12.54 +30:31:55.8: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:03.38 +30:37:03.3: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:05:59.66 +28:34:00.8: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:59.66 +28:34:00.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2784 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:12.54 +30:31:55.8: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:12.54 +30:31:55.8: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4339 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:03.38 +30:37:03.3: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:03.38 +30:37:03.3: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4962 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:13:05.95 +27:03:04.4: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:13:05.95 +27:03:04.4: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:05.95 +27:03:04.4: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3833 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:36.33 +32:20:16.5: 14.93 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:01.71 +30:56:40.2: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:16:30.26 +27:14:04.0: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:15:51.28 +32:24:47.9: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:36.33 +32:20:16.5: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:01.71 +30:56:40.2: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:36.33 +32:20:16.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5915 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:01.71 +30:56:40.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6548 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:59.40 +30:35:59.7: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:16:30.26 +27:14:04.0: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:30.26 +27:14:04.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7791 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:15:51.28 +32:24:47.9: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:51.28 +32:24:47.9: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7846 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:59.40 +30:35:59.7: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:59.40 +30:35:59.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9327 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:01.76 +31:18:06.9: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:01.76 +31:18:06.9: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:42:01.76 +31:18:06.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7303 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:19:12.40 +26:47:37.6: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:19:12.40 +26:47:37.6: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:19:12.40 +26:47:37.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3516 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198226.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32881.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190247_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190247_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:08.87 +25:55:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190267_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190267_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:24.27 +27:15:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190270_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190270_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190272_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190272_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190283_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190283_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.53 +29:45:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190284_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190284_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190285_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190285_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:36.59 +29:17:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190286_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190286_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:34.47 +27:58:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190287_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190287_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:29.31 +32:45:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190288_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190288_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.81 +31:13:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190289_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190289_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:32.34 +28:07:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190292_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190292_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190293_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190293_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:57.64 +26:08:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190295_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190295_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:05.78 +31:03:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190298_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190298_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:18.65 +30:59:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190303_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190303_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190305_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190305_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:30.70 +32:59:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190307_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190307_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:47.89 +26:38:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190311_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190311_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:44.06 +31:07:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190312_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190312_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.33 +26:05:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190313_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190313_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:57.15 +29:27:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190315_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190315_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.64 +27:28:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190317_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190317_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:17.22 +26:53:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190323_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 190323_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.55 +26:48:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192951_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 192951_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.96 +29:29:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193974_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 193974_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.05 +29:45:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193976_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 193976_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.20 +26:07:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194133_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 194133_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:16.95 +29:19:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194267_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 194267_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.57 +29:47:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194457_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 194457_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.70 +27:48:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194535_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 194535_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.26 +27:38:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195330_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 195330_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.62 +27:12:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195434_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 195434_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.64 +27:12:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195501_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 195501_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195878_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 195878_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.29 +26:07:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195911_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 195911_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.34 +32:38:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195924_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 195924_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:55.41 +29:39:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196111_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 196111_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.75 +33:53:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196228_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 196228_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196433_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 196433_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.70 +30:33:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196788_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 196788_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:05.50 +27:52:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197349_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197349_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.80 +32:10:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197352_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197352_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:05.66 +30:55:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197455_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197455_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.36 +26:04:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197456_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197456_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.99 +33:20:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197587_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197587_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.55 +33:13:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197628_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197628_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.56 +26:54:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197662_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197662_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:31.37 +29:02:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197755_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197755_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.40 +30:38:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197818_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197818_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:10.03 +33:21:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197988_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 197988_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.04 +32:38:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198112_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198112_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.98 +33:15:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198155_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198155_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:15.40 +27:44:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198192_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198192_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.20 +27:02:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198210_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198210_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.46 +26:19:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198226_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 198226_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198338_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198338_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.69 +29:44:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198435_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198435_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:26.89 +27:59:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198560_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198560_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.58 +26:19:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198649_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198649_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.64 +28:32:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198661_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198661_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.06 +26:37:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198774_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198774_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:20.68 +27:07:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198789_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198789_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:08.62 +25:49:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198880_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198880_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.92 +31:14:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198907_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 198907_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.99 +30:56:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199054_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199054_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:55.91 +27:08:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199089_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199089_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.79 +26:58:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199144_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199144_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:31.39 +27:14:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199360_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199360_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.06 +31:07:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199374_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199374_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:14.45 +32:50:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199828_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199828_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:12.18 +26:20:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199920_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199920_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199943_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199943_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.88 +30:35:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199966_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 199966_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.93 +32:46:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200099_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200099_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200153_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200153_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200272_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200272_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200344_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200344_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.37 +26:08:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200374_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200374_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.71 +25:50:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200390_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200390_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:51.83 +27:10:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200461_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200461_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:44.14 +25:53:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200526_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200526_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:34.78 +32:22:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200548_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200548_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.32 +28:54:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200549_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200549_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200582_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200582_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.60 +27:40:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200653_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200653_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.52 +26:47:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200792_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200792_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200845_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200845_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.09 +32:38:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200858_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200858_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:39.33 +28:29:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200905_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200905_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200940_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200940_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:36.97 +26:28:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200952_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200952_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.48 +31:36:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200985_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 200985_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:08.44 +27:43:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201105_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201105_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201180_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201180_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:20.40 +25:53:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201191_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201191_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201291_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201291_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201300_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201300_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:40.51 +33:10:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201680_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201680_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:19.09 +29:12:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201766_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201766_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201858_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201858_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:56.99 +27:21:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201868_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201868_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:56.76 +29:27:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201925_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 201925_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.22 +33:20:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202043_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202043_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202109_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202109_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:25.23 +28:21:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202119_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202119_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.60 +29:57:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202235_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202235_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:22.70 +28:12:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202291_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202291_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:58.89 +31:27:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:04.17 +28:25:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202659_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202659_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:22.08 +30:06:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202664_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202664_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.62 +29:56:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202782_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202782_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:47.12 +30:28:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202884_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202884_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202983_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202983_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:07.80 +28:35:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202985_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 202985_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:58.35 +28:28:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203018_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203018_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:01.78 +28:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203031_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203031_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:46.82 +30:55:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203088_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203088_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:48.90 +31:28:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203134_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203134_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:46.48 +27:41:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203226_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203226_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:46.44 +26:31:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203282_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203282_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.07 +29:53:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203327_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203327_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:00.13 +28:25:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203540_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203540_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:34.39 +34:16:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203791_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203791_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:12.20 +29:40:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203839_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203839_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:04.22 +28:04:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203855_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 203855_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.00 +31:28:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204222_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 204222_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204374_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 204374_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:44.26 +26:17:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204410_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 204410_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:28.38 +26:58:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204979_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 204979_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:02.36 +28:24:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205000_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 205000_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205415_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 205415_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205515_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 205515_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:25.53 +29:14:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 205612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:23.18 +31:41:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205689_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 205689_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:45.70 +26:53:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205717_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 205717_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206111_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 206111_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:36.39 +31:38:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206348_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 206348_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:42.19 +28:54:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206536_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 206536_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:22.54 +32:41:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206921_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 206921_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:19.39 +29:16:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206933_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 206933_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207000_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 207000_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:04.99 +32:26:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207423_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 207423_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207634_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 207634_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207837_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 207837_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:32.82 +32:35:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208156_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 208156_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208562_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 208562_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:52.87 +29:01:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208583_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 208583_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:58.69 +32:22:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208724_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 208724_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187017_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 187017_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:18.73 +28:38:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:12.79 +28:30:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114325_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 114325_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:47.91 +26:59:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.42 +27:57:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.18 +30:16:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:48.84 +25:58:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_22-31-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks