This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 13.61 07:32:53.72 +17:55:07.1
201.11846 17.01605 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 0 1 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:32:53.72 +17:55:07.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:32:53.72 +17:55:07.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6333,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1333 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 13.77 07:26:34.62 +12:55:37.6
205.17389 13.56130 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.194 Prokne 0 4 4 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:26:34.62 +12:55:37.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:26:34.62 +12:55:37.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6333,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1333 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 13.53 07:02:14.21 +15:17:59.8
200.40207 9.25076 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.80 Sappho 2 3 4 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:14.21 +15:17:59.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:14.21 +15:17:59.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6333,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1333 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 13.46 06:45:41.56 +15:46:09.0
198.20559 5.88030 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.107 Camilla 3 2 4 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:41.56 +15:46:09.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:41.56 +15:46:09.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6333,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1333 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 14.31 06:53:44.91 +12:51:22.8
201.70279 6.32726 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.218 Bianca 1 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:44.91 +12:51:22.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:44.91 +12:51:22.8: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6333,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1333 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 12.12 06:40:05.12 +15:06:39.0
198.18511 4.37737 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" LX Gem
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 V 14.400 V 2452652.00000 74.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:05.12 +15:06:39.0: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:05.12 +15:06:39.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
LX Gem,2461172.6333,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
LX Gem 20260512.1333 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 9.61 07:02:40.88 +17:29:35.5
198.44114 10.29352 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GG Gem
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.460 V Y 1.090 V 2453143.80000 300.000000000000 M4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:40.88 +17:29:35.5: 10.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:40.88 +17:29:35.5: 10.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.64 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GG Gem,2461172.6333,9.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GG Gem 20260512.1333 9.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 12.71 07:10:50.69 +12:22:15.8
203.99799 9.85853 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J071050.68+122216.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.660 V 14.800 V 2458375.51950 126.197049200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:50.69 +12:22:15.8: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:50.69 +12:22:15.8: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J071050.68+122216.0,2461172.6333,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J071050.68+122216.0 20260512.1333 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1333 2461172.6333 10.44 07:18:36.11 +15:35:08.8
201.85880 12.93722 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0352 Gem
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.650 V 14.500 V 2453454.00000 287.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:36.11 +15:35:08.8: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:36.11 +15:35:08.8: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0352 Gem,2461172.6333,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0352 Gem 20260512.1333 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461172.63352633 12.05.2026 03:12:06.675 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 28
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 26326
Objects passed selection criteria: 26301
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24607
Average stars matched: 24098.5 (97.9335 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:28:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461172.63352633 12.05.2026 03:12:06.675 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 182
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 85 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 170986
Objects passed selection criteria: 170599
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 154252
Average stars matched: 150679 (97.6837 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2000852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:32:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.63304419
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Choosing aperture...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits was not found.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 18978 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Generating wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat from image00001.cat
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 19072 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Generating wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.658 +14:00:11.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 25465 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1702312.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1701659.xyls"...
### Converted positions of 28861 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1702328.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1701661.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1701661.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
Reading file "./out1701659.axy"...
log-odds ratio 115.709 (1.78482e+50), 16 match, 0 conflict, 24 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,14.0004), pixel scale 5.98099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-+-++--+-++-++-+++-----+-----+-----+(best)------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1701661.solved to indicate this.
log-odds ratio 112.846 (1.01977e+49), 16 match, 0 conflict, 26 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9921), pixel scale 5.98088 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-+++---+++--++++---+-----+-------+---+(best)----------------------------------------------------------
Field: out1701661.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (106.662413, 13.997200) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:06:38.979, +13:59:49.919).
Field size: 15.7963 x 10.5729 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.553 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1701659.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1701659.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (106.662870, 13.988796) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:06:39.089, +13:59:19.665).
Field size: 15.7961 x 10.5729 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.553 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:28 fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:28 out1701661.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:28 fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:28 out1701659.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1701661.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1701659.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1701661.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.73 degrees of RA,Dec (106.662,13.9964)
log-odds ratio 115.709 (1.78482e+50), 16 match, 0 conflict, 24 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,14.0004), pixel scale 5.98099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-+-++--+-++-++-+++-----+-----+-----+(best)------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1701659.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7283 degrees of RA,Dec (106.662,13.988)
log-odds ratio 112.846 (1.01977e+49), 16 match, 0 conflict, 26 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9921), pixel scale 5.98088 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-+++---+++--++++---+-----+-------+---+(best)----------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1701661.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1701661.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (106.663644, 13.996482) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:06:39.275, +13:59:47.335).
Field size: 15.7775 x 10.5805 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.558 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:28 fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:28 out1701661.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits)... done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1701659.solved to indicate this.
done!
Field: out1701659.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (106.664095, 13.988035) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:06:39.383, +13:59:16.926).
Field size: 15.7772 x 10.5808 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.557 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 23:28 fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 23:28 out1701659.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 84367 sources.
simplexy: found 85064 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7397, 955.497] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.74, 955.501] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
--> log-odds 15.1606
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 39.3025 (1.17178e+17), 22 match, 0 conflict, 507 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9973), pixel scale 5.98683 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------------+-------------------------------+-+------------------------------+-+----------------
--> log-odds 39.3025
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
--> log-odds 17.166
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 304.069 (1.13629e+132), 45 match, 0 conflict, 484 distractors, 54 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9973), pixel scale 5.98683 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----------+--+------+---------+-------------++++-------+----------------------+-+--------+-----+-
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 16.0307
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
--> log-odds 304.069
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 315.631 (1.19371e+137), 46 match, 0 conflict, 475 distractors, 54 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9888), pixel scale 5.98685 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+------+-+--------+---+---------------+-----------------++--------+---+-++-------------------------
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 532.653 (2.12996e+231), 67 match, 0 conflict, 519 distractors, 82 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9973), pixel scale 5.98683 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++--------+--+--+---+--------++-+-----------++++----+--+----------------+-----+-+--------++--+-+-
--> log-odds 315.631
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
--> log-odds 532.653
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 579.47 (4.57759e+251), 70 match, 0 conflict, 500 distractors, 82 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9888), pixel scale 5.98685 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+++---------+---++--+-----------+--+--------------++-------++---+-++----+-------------++-+---
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1444.74 (inf), 158 match, 0 conflict, 428 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9973), pixel scale 5.98683 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++-+-++-++++-+-++++-+-+-+--++++++-++-++++-+-+++++-+-+--++-----+--+++-+--+----++-++-+---++++--+++-
--> log-odds 579.47
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1456.08 (inf), 159 match, 0 conflict, 411 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9888), pixel scale 5.98685 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+++++++--------++++++++++++-++-----+--++++++--++----++++------++++-++++++-++++++-------+-++-++++
--> log-odds 1444.74
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2758.32 (inf), 305 match, 0 conflict, 337 distractors, 381 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9973), pixel scale 5.98683 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+++++++++++-++++++-+++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++-++++-+++-++++-+--+++-+++++++++--+++++-++++
--> log-odds 1456.08
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2783.46 (inf), 308 match, 0 conflict, 325 distractors, 381 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9888), pixel scale 5.98685 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++++++-++++-+++++++++++++++++++--++++++++++-+++-++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++--+++++++++++
--> log-odds 2758.32
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 4947.63 (inf), 587 match, 0 conflict, 614 distractors, 738 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9973), pixel scale 5.98683 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 2783.46
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 4945.88 (inf), 591 match, 0 conflict, 779 distractors, 736 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9888), pixel scale 5.98685 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 4947.63
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 8863.4 (inf), 1148 match, 0 conflict, 1351 distractors, 1457 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9973), pixel scale 5.98683 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 4945.88
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 8919.62 (inf), 1152 match, 0 conflict, 1116 distractors, 1456 index.
RA,Dec = (106.665,13.9888), pixel scale 5.98685 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 8863.4
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (106.663903, 13.996734) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:06:39.337, +13:59:48.243).
Field size: 15.7786 x 10.5736 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.555 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.new"...
--> log-odds 8919.62
Got 6 solutions.
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (106.664368, 13.988361) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:06:39.448, +13:59:18.100).
Field size: 15.7785 x 10.5736 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.555 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.new"...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat from image00004.cat
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.119 +13:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
### Converted positions of 22335 stars ###
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.230 +13:59:15.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1732150.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
### Converted positions of 22384 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1732257.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.230 +13:59:15.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.230 +13:59:15.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.119 +13:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.119 +13:59:45.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0156 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:39.230 +13:59:15.29
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:39.119 +13:59:45.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00839 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.99KrbVLiCy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pdUuVNuxvS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qkv6AcwFdA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ReCf8w4D7s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec +8.5622 to +19.2817 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec 8.5622 to 19.2817 deg
Loaded 18666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13861 out of 14947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14947 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.99KrbVLiCy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=224 n_q2=241 n_q3=224 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pdUuVNuxvS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.862 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.782 n_q1=188 n_q2=287 n_q3=176 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Qkv6AcwFdA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1233, passed=22384
Got 22384 stars (including 21132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22384 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.745 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.659 n_q1=216 n_q2=236 n_q3=224 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ReCf8w4D7s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1245, passed=22335
Got 22335 stars (including 21072 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.745 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=213 n_q2=241 n_q3=225 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:40.76 +16:09:06.8: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:55.07 +10:38:39.8: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:27.07 +15:18:27.0: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:32.16 +10:46:39.2: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:50:23.42 +13:32:19.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:03.84 +10:21:05.2: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:47.28 +13:46:22.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:17.26 +15:24:07.1: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:00:21.72 +16:28:52.7: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:40.76 +16:09:06.8: 11.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:40.76 +16:09:06.8: ref_mag=11.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1242 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:03:04.59 +12:29:25.9: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:03.84 +10:21:05.2: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:00:21.72 +16:28:52.7: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:27.07 +15:18:27.0: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:50:23.42 +13:32:19.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:03.84 +10:21:05.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6542 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:21.72 +16:28:52.7: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9826 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:27.07 +15:18:27.0: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8190 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:32.16 +10:46:39.2: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:23.42 +13:32:19.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9305 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:55.07 +10:38:39.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:47.28 +13:46:22.6: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:17.26 +15:24:07.1: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:32.16 +10:46:39.2: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9791 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:55.07 +10:38:39.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7734 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:47.28 +13:46:22.6: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0067 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:17.26 +15:24:07.1: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1374 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:03:04.59 +12:29:25.9: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:04.59 +12:29:25.9: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1467 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:20.33 +13:35:09.6: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:36.37 +18:48:29.3: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:53.22 +15:47:59.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:29.35 +11:17:56.1: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:07:07.97 +15:05:21.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:58.71 +13:21:31.8: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:20.33 +13:35:09.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:20.33 +13:35:09.6: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1218 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:07:07.97 +15:05:21.0: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:29.35 +11:17:56.1: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:36.37 +18:48:29.3: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:53.22 +15:47:59.9: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:07.97 +15:05:21.0: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2334 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.35 +11:17:56.1: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2054 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:58.71 +13:21:31.8: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:36.37 +18:48:29.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2640 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:53.22 +15:47:59.9: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2661 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:58.71 +13:21:31.8: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2178 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 30938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:12.82 +09:04:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 30939_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:29.31 +10:57:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30940_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 30940_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:04.47 +18:15:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31085_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31085_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.26 +10:34:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31230_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31230_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31349_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31349_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:27.49 +12:18:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31367_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31367_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:14.16 +13:51:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31378_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31378_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.58 +13:18:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:44.12 +16:43:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:31.86 +16:27:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31495_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31495_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31532_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31532_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31563_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31563_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31581_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31581_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:35.17 +15:01:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31626_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31626_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31659_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31659_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31667_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31667_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31699_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31699_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31754_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31754_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31764_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31764_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31768_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31768_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31782_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31782_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31800_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31800_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31824_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31824_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31850_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31850_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits was not found.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.119 +13:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.230 +13:59:15.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.658 +14:00:11.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 118554 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 119367 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1913112.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1913111.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
### Converted positions of 174030 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1913288.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
### Converted positions of 208537 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1913357.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.230 +13:59:15.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.230 +13:59:15.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.119 +13:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.119 +13:59:45.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0156 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:39.230 +13:59:15.29
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:39.119 +13:59:45.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00839 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yZHx8eCDDk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o2pqJjIW2X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.20f79y7VGD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hdtDjNgbs4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec +8.5562 to +19.2862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec 8.5562 to 19.2862 deg
Loaded 18685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11872 out of 16121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16121 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 157 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
3.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
3.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yZHx8eCDDk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=232 n_q2=237 n_q3=201 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o2pqJjIW2X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.865 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.794 n_q1=200 n_q2=269 n_q3=177 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.20f79y7VGD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=11943, passed=118544
Got 118544 stars (including 106498 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits N_match=907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=224 n_q2=229 n_q3=229 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hdtDjNgbs4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=12230, passed=119357
Got 119357 stars (including 107015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 119357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 903 stars left (next iteration limit 993)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits N_match=903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.525 n_q1=216 n_q2=228 n_q3=233 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-11-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_223410_TTUQ1b1x1_2803190_bT8Udb9a/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:37:11.77 +12:06:29.9: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:36:48.39 +14:41:30.3: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:02.45 +17:46:00.7: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:33.87 +09:18:24.8: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:03:48.74 +09:39:14.6: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:20.56 +09:58:56.3: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:29:09.03 +14:15:53.3: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:59.03 +12:17:00.7: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:02.45 +17:46:00.7: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:20.56 +09:58:56.3: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:33.87 +09:18:24.8: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:20.56 +09:58:56.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4565 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:33.87 +09:18:24.8: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2602 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:02.45 +17:46:00.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5177 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:36:48.39 +14:41:30.3: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:03:48.74 +09:39:14.6: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:48.39 +14:41:30.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7436 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:08.23 +16:51:24.2: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:48.74 +09:39:14.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6414 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:37:11.77 +12:06:29.9: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:59.03 +12:17:00.7: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:29:09.03 +14:15:53.3: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:34:07.10 +13:32:04.5: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:11.77 +12:06:29.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8710 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:59.03 +12:17:00.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8881 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:09.03 +14:15:53.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1480 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:34:07.10 +13:32:04.5: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:07.10 +13:32:04.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8606 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:08.23 +16:51:24.2: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:08.23 +16:51:24.2: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2825 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:57:19.93 +10:31:34.2: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:38.35 +14:33:33.2: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:45.52 +17:04:09.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:34:28.33 +16:22:23.1: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:04.00 +15:49:53.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:57:19.93 +10:31:34.2: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:19.93 +10:31:34.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3002 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.05 +16:15:58.3: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:45.52 +17:04:09.6: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:28.33 +16:15:50.4: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:34:28.33 +16:22:23.1: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:45.52 +17:04:09.6: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4423 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:38.35 +14:33:33.2: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:40.82 +16:09:06.7: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:38.35 +14:33:33.2: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3184 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:28.33 +16:22:23.1: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8615 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:04.00 +15:49:53.8: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.00 +15:49:53.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2245 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.05 +16:15:58.3: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.05 +16:15:58.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3302 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:28.33 +16:15:50.4: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:40.82 +16:09:06.7: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:28.33 +16:15:50.4: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5968 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:40.82 +16:09:06.7: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1631 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:34:24.26 +13:14:22.0: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:34:24.26 +13:14:22.0: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:24.26 +13:14:22.0: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0295 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:39.93 +13:12:34.0: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:46.80 +09:46:10.7: 13.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:39.93 +13:12:34.0: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:39.93 +13:12:34.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0147 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:01.88 +14:07:49.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:46.80 +09:46:10.7: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:46.80 +09:46:10.7: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9987 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:01.88 +14:07:49.4: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:01.88 +14:07:49.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3128 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:31.12 +13:59:09.5: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:52.54 +11:49:27.3: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:20.50 +16:50:52.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:03:36.51 +10:47:13.9: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:52.54 +11:49:27.3: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:31.12 +13:59:09.5: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:28.61 +12:56:35.3: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:32:53.72 +17:55:07.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:31.12 +13:59:09.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2799 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:52.54 +11:49:27.3: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3714 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:19.35 +09:39:38.6: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:20.50 +16:50:52.6: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:20.50 +16:50:52.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6559 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:03:36.51 +10:47:13.9: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:36.51 +10:47:13.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5048 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:28.61 +12:56:35.3: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:32:53.72 +17:55:07.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:28.61 +12:56:35.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6100 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:19.35 +09:39:38.6: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:19.35 +09:39:38.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4805 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:28:09.47 +16:58:44.1: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:09.30 +14:01:27.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:28:09.47 +16:58:44.1: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:09.47 +16:58:44.1: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7416 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:48.79 +09:36:49.2: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:09.30 +14:01:27.8: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:09.30 +14:01:27.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6575 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:26:34.62 +12:55:37.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:04.39 +14:21:02.6: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:14.21 +15:17:59.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:24.82 +13:55:03.6: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:48.79 +09:36:49.2: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:48.79 +09:36:49.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4276 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:26:34.62 +12:55:37.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:41.56 +15:46:09.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:38.24 +14:49:04.3: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:04.39 +14:21:02.6: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:04.39 +14:21:02.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4951 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:14.21 +15:17:59.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:24.82 +13:55:03.6: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:24.82 +13:55:03.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6189 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:41.56 +15:46:09.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:38.24 +14:49:04.3: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:38.24 +14:49:04.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6765 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:37:43.29 +13:46:40.5: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:37:43.29 +13:46:40.5: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:43.29 +13:46:40.5: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4168 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:47.25 +14:48:21.1: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:18.70 +08:54:36.3: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:47.25 +14:48:21.1: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:47.25 +14:48:21.1: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6928 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:03:35.65 +10:47:31.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:33:01.24 +09:17:24.1: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:26.39 +13:39:17.2: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:25.17 +18:13:10.3: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:18.70 +08:54:36.3: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:18.70 +08:54:36.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6787 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:03:35.65 +10:47:31.9: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:35.65 +10:47:31.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7630 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:26.39 +13:39:17.2: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:26.39 +13:39:17.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7282 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:33:01.24 +09:17:24.1: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:01.24 +09:17:24.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7114 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:25.17 +18:13:10.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:25.17 +18:13:10.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7580 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:31:11.94 +12:04:52.1: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:01.13 +15:10:08.5: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:35:34.92 +17:08:37.1: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:31:11.94 +12:04:52.1: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:11.94 +12:04:52.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7521 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:29:11.61 +18:31:36.9: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:22.95 +11:38:56.4: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:22.55 +12:22:06.2: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:01.13 +15:10:08.5: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:01.13 +15:10:08.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9365 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:35:34.92 +17:08:37.1: 14.16 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:34.92 +17:08:37.1: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9152 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:22.95 +11:38:56.4: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:22.55 +12:22:06.2: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:29:11.61 +18:31:36.9: 14.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:22.95 +11:38:56.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9417 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:22.55 +12:22:06.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9854 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:11.61 +18:31:36.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9976 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:29:25.40 +16:31:14.3: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:29:25.40 +16:31:14.3: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:25.40 +16:31:14.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1808 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:44.91 +12:51:22.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:58.65 +10:36:12.7: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:35.78 +13:00:39.9: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:44.91 +12:51:22.8: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:58.65 +10:36:12.7: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:58.65 +10:36:12.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1848 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:35.78 +13:00:39.9: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:35.78 +13:00:39.9: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6169 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:46:16.55 +09:44:17.8: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:46:16.55 +09:44:17.8: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:16.55 +09:44:17.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4348 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:05.12 +15:06:39.0: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:48.46 +13:59:06.8: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:05.12 +15:06:39.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:40:05.12 +15:06:39.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1193 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:48.46 +13:59:06.8: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:48.46 +13:59:06.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5048 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:40.88 +17:29:35.5: 10.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:50.69 +12:22:15.8: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:40.88 +17:29:35.5: 10.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.64 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:40.88 +17:29:35.5: ref_mag=10.64 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6108 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:50.69 +12:22:15.8: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:10:50.69 +12:22:15.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7138 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:37:10.55 +10:01:58.7: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:36:56.44 +10:29:37.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:37:10.55 +10:01:58.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:10.55 +10:01:58.7: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3516 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:36:56.44 +10:29:37.9: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:56.44 +10:29:37.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9383 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:07:19.72 +12:36:40.7: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:07:19.72 +12:36:40.7: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:19.72 +12:36:40.7: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8745 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:36:24.44 +09:38:40.8: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:36.11 +15:35:08.8: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:36:24.44 +09:38:40.8: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:24.44 +09:38:40.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2495 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:16.74 +14:01:28.1: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:36.11 +15:35:08.8: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:18:36.11 +15:35:08.8: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4390 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:16.74 +14:01:28.1: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:16.74 +14:01:28.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6551 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out136204.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out140414.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out180972.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230353.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230587.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231896.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227617_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227617_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227637_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227637_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227642_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227642_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227645_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227645_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:01.26 +14:47:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227650_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227650_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227652_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227652_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227654_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227654_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:11.35 +18:07:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227661_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227661_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227662_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227662_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227668_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227668_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227673_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227673_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227675_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227675_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227677_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227677_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227678_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227678_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:42.92 +16:31:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227680_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227680_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:48.79 +15:17:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227682_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227682_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:27.77 +11:36:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227683_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227683_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227686_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227686_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227687_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227687_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227689_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227689_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227947_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227947_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.81 +16:09:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227957_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227957_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.40 +17:58:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227997_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 227997_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228158_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228158_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.68 +16:11:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228195_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228195_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:14.35 +13:51:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228269_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228269_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:44.20 +16:43:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228398_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228398_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.58 +19:12:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228568_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228568_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:45.37 +11:06:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228635_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228635_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:02.74 +09:18:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228644_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228644_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.25 +15:07:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228661_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228661_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:46.69 +17:48:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228777_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228777_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.39 +10:59:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228789_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228789_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.14 +12:08:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228884_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228884_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.53 +14:10:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228892_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228892_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.08 +12:33:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228914_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228914_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.42 +09:51:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228966_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 228966_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.64 +09:15:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229184_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229184_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:15.32 +08:58:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229192_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229192_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.53 +10:36:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229251_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229251_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229344_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229344_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:08.01 +10:07:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229373_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229373_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:30.76 +09:22:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229436_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229436_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.32 +17:27:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229500_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229500_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.43 +16:09:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229506_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229506_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:31.43 +10:56:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229545_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229545_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:24.70 +12:53:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229572_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229572_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229601_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229601_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:11.71 +16:34:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229650_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229650_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:52.20 +12:24:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229667_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229667_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.93 +17:50:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229704_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229704_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229719_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229719_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.06 +12:25:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229720_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229720_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:06.22 +11:58:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229767_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229767_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:36.48 +16:33:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229795_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229795_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.64 +15:47:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229803_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229803_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:35.03 +11:24:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229830_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229830_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229912_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229912_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:49.83 +17:03:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229955_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229955_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:47.40 +09:32:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229985_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229985_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:29.35 +10:51:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229996_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 229996_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.60 +15:48:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230000_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230000_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.42 +12:20:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230100_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230100_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:48.12 +09:36:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230138_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230138_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:18.73 +18:49:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:54.88 +09:30:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230161_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230161_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:05.30 +16:42:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230168_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230168_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:59.50 +13:05:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230221_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230221_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:31.13 +17:38:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230231_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230231_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:27.28 +12:55:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230232_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230232_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230240_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230240_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230242_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230242_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:30.14 +10:54:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230282_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230282_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:48.46 +09:22:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230284_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230284_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.95 +18:10:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230299_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230299_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:27.85 +09:37:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230310_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230310_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230325_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230325_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230342_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230342_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230343_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230343_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:43.27 +16:56:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230353_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 230353_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:27.91 +11:30:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230377_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230377_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230415_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230415_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.57 +19:03:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230423_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230423_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230427_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230427_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.33 +13:44:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230470_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230470_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:32.86 +10:25:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230548_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 230548_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230550_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230550_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:59.06 +11:39:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230560_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230560_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230564_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 230564_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230569_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230569_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230577_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230577_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:52.28 +13:23:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230587_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 230587_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230593_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230593_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230628_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230628_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:19.98 +17:46:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230669_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230669_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:56.76 +13:42:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230671_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230671_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230712_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230712_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:48.51 +17:52:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230730_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230730_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:27.73 +10:30:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:19.99 +18:19:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230823_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230823_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.06 +09:15:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230839_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230839_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:24.23 +12:38:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230840_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230840_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:33.20 +15:23:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230856_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230856_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:18.09 +14:02:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230876_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230876_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230908_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230908_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:13.42 +18:36:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:38.99 +15:33:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230966_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230966_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:51.96 +15:40:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230979_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230979_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230991_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 230991_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231029_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231029_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231098_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231098_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231127_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231127_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231165_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231165_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:20.95 +18:52:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231169_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231169_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231199_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231199_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:18.32 +17:59:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231220_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231220_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:29.35 +13:35:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231300_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231300_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231324_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231324_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231358_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231358_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231478_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231478_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231600_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231600_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231605_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231605_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:05.01 +11:07:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231650_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231650_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:11.96 +14:48:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231669_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231669_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:13.75 +11:28:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231779_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231779_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231896_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 231896_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231996_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 231996_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:22.67 +09:24:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219802_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219802_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:27.57 +12:18:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 220513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:35.27 +15:01:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23394_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 23394_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.73 +12:58:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19340_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 19340_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:32.87 +09:25:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136204_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 136204_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107020_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 107020_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14964_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 14964_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:09.38 +09:26:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180972_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 180972_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.55 +13:56:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.62 +13:18:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.31 +10:34:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219681_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219681_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:58.56 +09:25:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219671_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219671_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:51.13 +09:58:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219637_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219637_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219426_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219426_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219403_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219403_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219344_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219344_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:28.88 +18:10:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:52.40 +09:24:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219243_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 219243_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140414_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 140414_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113501_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 113501_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-12-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks