This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,7.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 7.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,7.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 7.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 11.98 07:49:37.98 +23:44:22.3
196.96943 22.84385 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.40 Harmonia -0 -0 0 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:49:37.98 +23:44:22.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:49:37.98 +23:44:22.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,7.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 7.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.9286+22.1603,2461172.6448,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.9286+22.1603 20260512.1448 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 13.04 07:01:42.00 +26:57:13.2
189.53917 14.01605 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 3 -1 3 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:01:42.00 +26:57:13.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:42.00 +26:57:13.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 13.51 07:17:48.51 +22:18:24.0
195.45466 15.52196 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 1 0 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:48.51 +22:18:24.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:48.51 +22:18:24.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 13.64 07:37:23.12 +22:52:20.6
196.73587 19.90924 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:23.12 +22:52:20.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:23.12 +22:52:20.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 13.61 07:32:54.89 +17:55:07.4
201.12033 17.02033 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 1 3 3 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:54.89 +17:55:07.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:54.89 +17:55:07.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 13.96 07:35:35.28 +22:52:49.2
196.56335 19.52836 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 0 1 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:35.28 +22:52:49.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:35.28 +22:52:49.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 14.09 07:40:11.20 +20:43:38.8
199.10778 19.70055 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 1 2 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:11.20 +20:43:38.8: 15.79 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:11.20 +20:43:38.8: 15.57 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 14.57 07:39:31.24 +21:13:23.3
198.55800 19.74586 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.334 Chicago -2 4 5 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:31.24 +21:13:23.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:31.24 +21:13:23.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 14.66 07:39:22.09 +25:21:06.4
194.44738 21.23661 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.143 Adria 0 1 2 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:22.09 +25:21:06.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:22.09 +25:21:06.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 14.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1448 2461172.6448 14.84 07:35:27.00 +22:09:31.2
197.25902 19.22646 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.382 Dodona 1 1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:27.00 +22:09:31.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:27.00 +22:09:31.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6448,7.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1448 7.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461172.64509383 12.05.2026 03:28:46.107 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21766
Objects passed selection criteria: 21746
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20506.2
Average stars matched: 19582.8 (95.4965 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 22:57:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461172.64509383 12.05.2026 03:28:46.107 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 75 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 138644
Objects passed selection criteria: 138338
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 121390
Average stars matched: 116336 (95.8364 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1911124 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 23:01:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.64447786
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Choosing aperture...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Choosing aperture...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 15292 high-SNR stars for plate solving
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 15283 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3950667.xyls"...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3950664.xyls"...
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 23656 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3951241.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
### Converted positions of 22550 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3951324.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3950667.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3950664.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 33.3955 (3.18774e+14), 8 match, 0 conflict, 23 distractors, 42 index.
RA,Dec = (110.788,22.0139), pixel scale 5.95435 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----+-----+-----+--++-+-----+(best)--------------++-----------------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3950667.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 33.52 (3.61037e+14), 8 match, 0 conflict, 23 distractors, 42 index.
RA,Dec = (110.776,22.0051), pixel scale 5.95426 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----+-----+-----+--++-+-----+(best)--------------+------+-----------------------------------------------
Field: out3950667.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.765015, 22.008309) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:03.603, +22:00:29.914).
Field size: 15.7983 x 10.5732 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.556 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3950664.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3950664.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.753124, 21.999563) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:00.750, +21:59:58.428).
Field size: 15.7981 x 10.5732 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.556 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:57 fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:57 out3950667.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:57 fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:57 out3950664.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits (fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3950667.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3950664.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3950667.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7317 degrees of RA,Dec (110.764,22.0075)
log-odds ratio 133.805 (1.29042e+58), 15 match, 0 conflict, 12 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (110.763,22.0084), pixel scale 5.97431 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++-++-++-+--++++-+-+--+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3950664.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7317 degrees of RA,Dec (110.752,21.9988)
log-odds ratio 133.036 (5.98198e+57), 15 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (110.751,21.9997), pixel scale 5.97437 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++-++-++-+--++++-+-+----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3950667.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3950667.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.765916, 22.007646) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:03.820, +22:00:27.527).
Field size: 15.7758 x 10.5753 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.561 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3950664.solved to indicate this.
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:57 fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:57 out3950667.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits)... done!
done!
Field: out3950664.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.754004, 21.998866) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:00.961, +21:59:55.917).
Field size: 15.7757 x 10.5752 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.561 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:57 fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:57 out3950664.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 67866 sources.
simplexy: found 67830 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7427, 955.542] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Solving...
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7422, 955.534] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 23.0369 (1.0111e+10), 21 match, 0 conflict, 510 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (110.767,22.0084), pixel scale 5.98706 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---------------+----------+-+-------+------------+-----------------------------------------------+--
--> log-odds 23.0369
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 264.332 (6.27726e+114), 40 match, 0 conflict, 491 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (110.767,22.0084), pixel scale 5.98706 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------++----------+-+-+-----+------+-----+----------------+-+-+------+----------------+--+-+
--> log-odds 19.6017
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 80.4815 (8.96783e+34), 23 match, 0 conflict, 530 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (110.755,21.9996), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+---+--+-------------+-----+-----------------------------+----------------+-----------------
--> log-odds 264.332
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 755.978 (inf), 84 match, 0 conflict, 447 distractors, 88 index.
RA,Dec = (110.767,22.0084), pixel scale 5.98706 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+---------++--+--+----+-+-------++--+-++----++-+-----+---+----+-+++------+--+++-----------+--+-+
--> log-odds 80.4815
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 277.858 (4.69964e+120), 41 match, 0 conflict, 512 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (110.755,21.9996), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+--+---+--+-------------+----++-----------------+-----------+-----------+----++-+--------+-----
--> log-odds 755.978
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1767.25 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 361 distractors, 193 index.
RA,Dec = (110.767,22.0084), pixel scale 5.98706 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++-+++--+++++++-+++--++-+++-+-++++-+++++++--++-+----++-+-++++++-+++++-++-+--++++++-++-++--+-++++
--> log-odds 277.858
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 789.754 (inf), 86 match, 0 conflict, 467 distractors, 88 index.
RA,Dec = (110.755,21.9996), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-+-++---+--+-+--------+-++----++------+-----++---+--------+--+----+-++---+----++-+------+-+--+--
--> log-odds 1767.25
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3314.5 (inf), 357 match, 0 conflict, 472 distractors, 374 index.
RA,Dec = (110.767,22.0084), pixel scale 5.98706 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-++++++++++++++++-+++-+++++++++++++++++-++++-+-+-+++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++-++++++-++++++
--> log-odds 789.754
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1798.03 (inf), 187 match, 0 conflict, 366 distractors, 195 index.
RA,Dec = (110.755,21.9996), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-++-++++++-++-+-++++---+++-+-++-++++--++++-+-+++---+++++-+--+-+++--+-+++++++--+-+-+++-++-+
--> log-odds 1798.03
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3314.5
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
log-odds ratio 3310.89 (inf), 357 match, 0 conflict, 482 distractors, 376 index.
RA,Dec = (110.755,21.9996), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-++-++++++-++-++++++++++++++++++++-+-+++++-+++++-+-+++++++-+++++++++++++++++-++++++++-++-+
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6128.62 (inf), 707 match, 1 conflict, 702 distractors, 742 index.
RA,Dec = (110.767,22.0084), pixel scale 5.98706 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3310.89
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6096.01 (inf), 706 match, 1 conflict, 1142 distractors, 744 index.
RA,Dec = (110.755,21.9996), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++
--> log-odds 6128.62
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10915.3 (inf), 1369 match, 0 conflict, 1412 distractors, 1463 index.
RA,Dec = (110.767,22.0084), pixel scale 5.98706 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6096.01
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10992.1 (inf), 1381 match, 0 conflict, 1933 distractors, 1465 index.
RA,Dec = (110.755,21.9996), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10915.3
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.765499, 22.008143) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:03.720, +22:00:29.314).
Field size: 15.7757 x 10.5723 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.556 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.492 +22:00:26.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 18147 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3972080.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
--> log-odds 10992.1
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (110.753589, 21.999390) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:23:00.861, +21:59:57.803).
Field size: 15.7756 x 10.5724 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.556 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.634 +21:59:55.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 18180 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3972232.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.634 +21:59:55.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:00.634 +21:59:55.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0218 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.492 +22:00:26.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:03.492 +22:00:26.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0349 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:00.634 +21:59:55.00
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:03.492 +22:00:26.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01409 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lh7dvBIWVE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KS7orP7qpt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Otgkhbcb3u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ezwl9gRG96
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.904800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.904800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
3.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
3.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lh7dvBIWVE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=221 n_q2=247 n_q3=258 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KS7orP7qpt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=167 n_q2=275 n_q3=215 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Otgkhbcb3u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=954, passed=18180
Got 18180 stars (including 17210 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=195 n_q2=253 n_q3=243 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ezwl9gRG96 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=989, passed=18147
Got 18147 stars (including 17148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18147 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=194 n_q2=252 n_q3=244 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:50.53 +20:02:57.9: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:49:37.98 +23:44:22.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:33.27 +21:20:40.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:16.98 +20:32:39.5: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:10.52 +20:33:22.0: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:50.53 +20:02:57.9: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:50.53 +20:02:57.9: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3067 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:49:37.98 +23:44:22.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:16.98 +20:32:39.5: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:33.27 +21:20:40.5: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:16.98 +20:32:39.5: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2573 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:10.52 +20:33:22.0: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:33.27 +21:20:40.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2095 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:10.52 +20:33:22.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0997 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33437.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 33133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:52.61 +22:42:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 33134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33135_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 33135_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33386_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 33386_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:14.80 +18:30:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 33437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 33477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 33528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33532_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 33532_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33551_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 33551_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.48 +23:26:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:49:37.98 +23:44:22.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.634 +21:59:55.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.492 +22:00:26.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.842 +21:59:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 91851 stars ###
### Converted positions of 91847 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4130616.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4130577.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
### Converted positions of 151496 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 153680 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4131066.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4131099.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.634 +21:59:55.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:00.634 +21:59:55.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0218 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.492 +22:00:26.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:03.492 +22:00:26.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0349 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:00.634 +21:59:55.00
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:03.492 +22:00:26.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01409 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7VlydgCS1E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mMa9ocOCIc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vwnnpndtJl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tu2ENTVARg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7VlydgCS1E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=17863, passed=153629
Got 153629 stars (including 135492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=232 n_q2=238 n_q3=246 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mMa9ocOCIc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=182 n_q2=266 n_q3=224 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vwnnpndtJl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=6756, passed=91825
Got 91825 stars (including 84970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 91825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=199 n_q2=254 n_q3=247 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tu2ENTVARg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=6688, passed=91830
Got 91830 stars (including 85031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 91830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=203 n_q2=251 n_q3=246 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0024.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_223213_TTUQ1b1x1_2673193_eHTFkg0p/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:51.92 +20:58:05.4: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:44:15.67 +20:58:37.0: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:54:11.24 +25:43:01.2: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:53:56.36 +22:10:44.5: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:51.92 +20:58:05.4: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:44:15.67 +20:58:37.0: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:11.24 +25:43:01.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:51.92 +20:58:05.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4680 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:15.67 +20:58:37.0: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6126 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:11.24 +25:43:01.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7203 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:56.36 +22:10:44.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:56.36 +22:10:44.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6972 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:01:42.00 +26:57:13.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:42.00 +26:57:13.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:48.51 +22:18:24.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:48.51 +22:18:24.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:23.12 +22:52:20.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:54.89 +17:55:07.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:23.12 +22:52:20.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:54.89 +17:55:07.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:53:10.07 +23:16:44.1: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:27.73 +22:47:25.7: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:53:10.07 +23:16:44.1: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:10.07 +23:16:44.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7522 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:27.73 +22:47:25.7: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:27.73 +22:47:25.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6888 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:02.58 +20:48:57.1: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:35.28 +22:52:49.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:02.58 +20:48:57.1: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:02.58 +20:48:57.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8952 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:35.28 +22:52:49.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:05.34 +24:19:24.2: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:50.25 +21:15:36.5: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:05.34 +24:19:24.2: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:50.25 +21:15:36.5: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:05.34 +24:19:24.2: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0919 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:50.25 +21:15:36.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0834 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:50:23.45 +24:44:57.0: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:50:23.45 +24:44:57.0: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:23.45 +24:44:57.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1022 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:11.20 +20:43:38.8: 15.79 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:12.18 +26:11:51.1: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:11.20 +20:43:38.8: 15.57 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:40:11.20 +20:43:38.8: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.0838 delta=1.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:12.18 +26:11:51.1: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:12.18 +26:11:51.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8767 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:32.62 +21:21:49.5: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:31.24 +21:13:23.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:22.09 +25:21:06.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:27.00 +22:09:31.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:32.62 +21:21:49.5: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:32.62 +21:21:49.5: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5456 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:22.09 +25:21:06.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:31.24 +21:13:23.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:27.00 +22:09:31.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:54:07.29 +18:42:25.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:07.29 +18:42:25.9: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:07.29 +18:42:25.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4002 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:49:57.69 +26:07:26.9: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:49:57.69 +26:07:26.9: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:57.69 +26:07:26.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1955 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out181990.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182383.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182480.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182918.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183345.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:40.84 +22:36:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:25.86 +17:43:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181162_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181162_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181165_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181165_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181169_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181169_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:59.52 +25:31:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181172_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181172_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:25.75 +22:06:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.75 +21:35:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181175_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181175_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:00.05 +19:41:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181177_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 181177_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:37.98 +23:44:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.64 +19:12:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.50 +22:23:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 181758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181778_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181778_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.41 +26:03:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181811_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181811_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.81 +23:56:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181841_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181841_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.48 +21:18:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.88 +20:58:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181912_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181912_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.70 +22:17:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.54 +25:29:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181963_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181963_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.31 +24:32:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181975_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181975_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.85 +23:26:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181990_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 181990_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181996_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 181996_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.33 +21:47:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182004_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182004_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.93 +18:51:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182028_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182028_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.49 +24:54:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182033_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182033_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:02.30 +26:11:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182054_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182054_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:49.20 +22:02:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182057_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182057_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.14 +18:14:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.45 +21:31:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182107_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182107_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.75 +23:41:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182112_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182112_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.69 +24:40:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182235_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182235_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:11.33 +25:40:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182247_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182247_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.30 +23:05:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182275_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182275_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:14.71 +23:44:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182314_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182314_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.62 +20:31:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182341_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182341_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.54 +20:05:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182350_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182350_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.69 +26:19:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182355_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182355_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.62 +19:10:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182365_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182365_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.06 +25:18:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182369_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182369_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.57 +20:35:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182379_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182379_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.21 +24:28:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182383_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 182383_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182388_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182388_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:59.86 +25:32:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182399_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182399_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:53.79 +17:40:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182417_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182417_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.79 +19:56:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:53.86 +23:53:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.12 +19:14:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.05 +20:06:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 182474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 182480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.63 +22:40:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:04.70 +18:53:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:22.65 +24:42:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.34 +18:53:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.87 +21:27:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.08 +21:35:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182555_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182555_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182581_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182581_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.82 +20:49:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182600_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182600_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:54.82 +20:22:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182645_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182645_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:43.74 +26:07:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182687_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182687_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:39.37 +25:35:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182688_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182688_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:42.08 +18:24:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182715_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182715_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:56.33 +26:45:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182718_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182718_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:49.59 +17:39:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182723_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182723_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.86 +17:52:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182732_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182732_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:30.08 +22:53:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.65 +25:50:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 182762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182765_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182765_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:53.67 +18:56:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182767_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182767_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:26.05 +25:37:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.06 +25:27:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182782_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182782_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.66 +25:49:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:58.45 +26:47:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182796_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182796_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:15.17 +17:12:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182813_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182813_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:24.23 +24:47:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182828_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182828_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:40.09 +21:17:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182845_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182845_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182851_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182851_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:33.09 +19:14:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182863_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182863_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182865_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182865_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.91 +21:26:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:04.95 +20:58:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182885_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182885_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182896_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182896_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.67 +25:44:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182911_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182911_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:31.04 +25:14:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182915_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182915_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.49 +18:18:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 182918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182924_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182924_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182934_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182934_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:39.39 +25:20:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182957_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182957_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.35 +21:13:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182990_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182990_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.76 +17:29:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182999_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 182999_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:35.41 +22:37:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 183001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.03 +22:26:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183033_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 183033_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.63 +20:49:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183047_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 183047_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:49.31 +20:17:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 183160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:50.95 +17:24:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183186_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 183186_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:25.23 +20:09:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183247_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 183247_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:39.22 +18:56:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 183305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183326_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 183326_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183344_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 183344_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183345_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 183345_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168691_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 168691_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:29.35 +26:03:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 35498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.47 +23:26:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 104156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84938_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
Preparing report for the candidate 84938_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.47 +26:47:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114069_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025
The candidate 114069_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-28-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0025 did not pass the final checks
