This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 13.12 07:01:41.87 +26:57:14.3
189.53868 14.01573 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 2 -0 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:41.87 +26:57:14.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:41.87 +26:57:14.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6437,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1437 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 13.33 07:07:59.13 +32:15:28.2
184.99949 17.31749 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.0" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.98 Ianthe 3 1 3 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:59.13 +32:15:28.2: 16.09 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:59.13 +32:15:28.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.09 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6437,13.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1437 13.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 13.45 06:30:24.08 +28:37:55.5
185.01233 8.44724 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.87 Sylvia 8 -3 8 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:24.08 +28:37:55.5: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:24.08 +28:37:55.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6437,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1437 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 13.46 06:34:18.58 +29:27:13.6
184.64578 9.57586 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.94 Aurora 3 -0 3 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:34:18.58 +29:27:13.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:34:18.58 +29:27:13.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6437,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1437 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 13.87 06:24:22.00 +31:56:28.0
181.42938 8.75648 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.187 Lamberta 3 5 6 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:24:22.00 +31:56:28.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:24:22.00 +31:56:28.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461172.6437,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260512.1437 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 13.73 06:58:31.47 +29:28:51.3
186.86050 14.38033 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J065831.41+292851.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.590 V 15.190 V 2458506.07350 82.613077300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:31.47 +29:28:51.3: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:31.47 +29:28:51.3: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J065831.41+292851.1,2461172.6437,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J065831.41+292851.1 20260512.1437 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 13.40 06:38:03.03 +25:19:01.4
188.78022 8.51239 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J063802.92+251859.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.790 V 15.540 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:03.03 +25:19:01.4: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:03.03 +25:19:01.4: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J063802.92+251859.0,2461172.6437,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J063802.92+251859.0 20260512.1437 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 11.60 06:35:42.59 +30:34:29.5
183.75323 10.33473 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0635426+303431
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.707 R1 Y 0.362 R1 105.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:35:42.59 +30:34:29.5: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:35:42.59 +30:34:29.5: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0635426+303431,2461172.6437,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0635426+303431 20260512.1437 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 12.29 06:43:12.70 +28:30:11.5
186.36806 10.92547 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J064312.71+283011.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.160 V 13.990 V 2457439.90000 110.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:12.70 +28:30:11.5: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:12.70 +28:30:11.5: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J064312.71+283011.2,2461172.6437,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J064312.71+283011.2 20260512.1437 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 13.50 06:50:45.09 +27:42:38.9
187.81304 12.10341 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J065045.04+274237.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.050 V 14.830 V 2458384.59020 122.506970400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:45.09 +27:42:38.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:45.09 +27:42:38.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J065045.04+274237.0,2461172.6437,13.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J065045.04+274237.0 20260512.1437 13.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 12.1437 2461172.6437 11.22 06:26:09.24 +30:22:14.9
183.02253 8.39537 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX10" NSVS J0626089+302223
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.735 R1 Y 0.464 R1 121.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:09.24 +30:22:14.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:09.24 +30:22:14.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0626089+302223,2461172.6437,11.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0626089+302223 20260512.1437 11.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461172.64396855 12.05.2026 03:27:08.883 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23524
Objects passed selection criteria: 23486
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20995.8
Average stars matched: 20398 (97.153 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 22:43:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461172.64396855 12.05.2026 03:27:08.883 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 143
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 80 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 155984
Objects passed selection criteria: 155660
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 130106
Average stars matched: 125169 (96.205 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1975272 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 22:47:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461172.64341866
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 15287 high-SNR stars for plate solving
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 15389 high-SNR stars for plate solving
Generating wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3199688.xyls"...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3199690.xyls"...
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:03.050 +30:00:19.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 24243 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3200116.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
### Converted positions of 24037 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3200136.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3199690.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3199688.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 221.815 (2.15215e+96), 21 match, 0 conflict, 6 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (104.99,30.0031), pixel scale 5.97588 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+--+++-+-+-+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 221.874 (2.28352e+96), 21 match, 0 conflict, 6 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (105,30.0143), pixel scale 5.97586 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+-++-+-+-+-+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3199690.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3199690.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (104.995079, 29.995422) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (06:59:58.819, +29:59:43.521).
Field size: 15.7954 x 10.5757 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.575 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3199688.solved to indicate this.
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits'
Field: out3199688.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.004485, 30.006463) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:01.076, +30:00:23.268).
Field size: 15.7953 x 10.5757 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.575 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' -> 'fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:43 fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:43 out3199690.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:43 fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:43 out3199688.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits (fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits (fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3199688.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3199690.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3199688.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7233 degrees of RA,Dec (105.003,30.0057)
log-odds ratio 221.874 (2.28352e+96), 21 match, 0 conflict, 6 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (105,30.0143), pixel scale 5.97586 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+-++-+-+-+-+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3199690.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7233 degrees of RA,Dec (104.994,29.9946)
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3199688.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3199688.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.003517, 30.006832) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:00.844, +30:00:24.596).
Field size: 15.7776 x 10.5761 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.579 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
log-odds ratio 221.815 (2.15215e+96), 21 match, 0 conflict, 6 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (104.99,30.0031), pixel scale 5.97588 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+--+++-+-+-+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:43 fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:43 out3199688.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits)... done!
done!
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3199690.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3199690.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (104.994102, 29.995817) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (06:59:58.584, +29:59:44.940).
Field size: 15.7778 x 10.5759 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.579 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 22:43 fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 22:43 out3199690.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 70255 sources.
simplexy: found 69050 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7299, 955.35] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.0493
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 74.0179 (1.39825e+32), 21 match, 0 conflict, 244 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (105.005,30.0076), pixel scale 5.9859 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+--------------------------------------------+--------------+--+--------+----------------+----
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7308, 955.363] arcmin
--> log-odds 74.0179
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 349.976 (9.83131e+151), 47 match, 0 conflict, 492 distractors, 50 index.
RA,Dec = (105.005,30.0076), pixel scale 5.9859 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------++--+----------------+--------+--------------+-----+++------+--+--------+----------------+--+-
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 133.502 (9.52729e+57), 24 match, 0 conflict, 363 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (104.995,29.9966), pixel scale 5.98599 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------+------------+-----------------------------+----+------+---+----------------+---------
--> log-odds 349.976
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 801.832 (inf), 89 match, 0 conflict, 450 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (105.005,30.0076), pixel scale 5.9859 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--+++--++++------+------++------++---+-+---+--+++-----+++------++-+--------+--------+-----+-+-++-
--> log-odds 133.502
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 379.331 (5.51059e+164), 48 match, 0 conflict, 507 distractors, 50 index.
RA,Dec = (104.995,29.9966), pixel scale 5.98599 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------+---++-----+-----+-------------+---------------+----+------+---++-----------+---++--------
--> log-odds 801.832
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1799.36 (inf), 188 match, 0 conflict, 429 distractors, 202 index.
RA,Dec = (105.005,30.0076), pixel scale 5.9859 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++--++++-+++++--++++--+-+-++--++-+++---++++--+--+++-+--++++-+-++-++++--+--+-++-+-++++-++-+-++-++++-
--> log-odds 379.331
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 829.889 (inf), 91 match, 0 conflict, 464 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (104.995,29.9966), pixel scale 5.98599 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+-++-++++-----+-----+----+---+-+--+---------------+++--+------+---++----------++--+++---+----
--> log-odds 829.889
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1796 (inf), 188 match, 0 conflict, 429 distractors, 203 index.
RA,Dec = (104.995,29.9966), pixel scale 5.98599 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+-++-+++++++---+-+----++---++++++-++++------++++-+--++++-++++-++++--+++--+----+--++-++++++-+-+-+
--> log-odds 1799.36
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3364.05 (inf), 365 match, 0 conflict, 376 distractors, 388 index.
RA,Dec = (105.005,30.0076), pixel scale 5.9859 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-++++-+++++-+++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++--++++++++++++++-+++++-++++++++++++++-++++++++
--> log-odds 1796
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3303.27 (inf), 359 match, 0 conflict, 455 distractors, 389 index.
RA,Dec = (104.995,29.9966), pixel scale 5.98599 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++++++++++--++-++++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++++++++-++++++++++++++-+++++-+-++++--+++++++++++-+-+
--> log-odds 3364.05
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5986.51 (inf), 694 match, 0 conflict, 827 distractors, 742 index.
RA,Dec = (105.005,30.0076), pixel scale 5.9859 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++--++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++-++++++++
--> log-odds 3303.27
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5913.89 (inf), 684 match, 0 conflict, 673 distractors, 740 index.
RA,Dec = (104.995,29.9966), pixel scale 5.98599 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5986.51
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10803.8 (inf), 1359 match, 1 conflict, 2130 distractors, 1461 index.
RA,Dec = (105.005,30.0076), pixel scale 5.9859 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5913.89
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10767.5 (inf), 1352 match, 0 conflict, 1736 distractors, 1459 index.
RA,Dec = (104.995,29.9966), pixel scale 5.98599 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10803.8
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (105.003555, 30.007458) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:00:00.853, +30:00:26.850).
Field size: 15.7769 x 10.572 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.571 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.new"...
--> log-odds 10767.5
Got 7 solutions.
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits'
Field: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits was not found.
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (104.994133, 29.996417) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (06:59:58.592, +29:59:47.100).
Field size: 15.777 x 10.572 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.571 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.new"...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat from image00003.cat
renamed 'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits'
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.609 +30:00:24.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
### Converted positions of 18097 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:58.348 +29:59:44.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3212769.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
### Converted positions of 18138 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3212881.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.609 +30:00:24.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:00.609 +30:00:24.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:58.348 +29:59:44.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:58.348 +29:59:44.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0072 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:00.609 +30:00:24.04
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:58.348 +29:59:44.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01373 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BWHaZgxrTd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.owv7q4m64a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JNX6xEssyy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OnNO6UqTyV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.5 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BWHaZgxrTd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=224 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.owv7q4m64a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=224 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JNX6xEssyy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=905, passed=18097
Got 18097 stars (including 17181 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18097 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=218 n_q2=257 n_q3=236 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OnNO6UqTyV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=912, passed=18134
Got 18134 stars (including 17213 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18134 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=222 n_q2=253 n_q3=232 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:04:49.09 +28:48:15.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:04:49.09 +28:48:15.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:49.09 +28:48:15.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3345 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31402_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 31402_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:36.96 +31:52:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 31406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.45 +31:35:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31608_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 31608_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:40.91 +27:59:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31618_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 31618_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.69 +30:33:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31855_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 31855_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.60 +33:41:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31856_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 31856_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.57 +33:55:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32201_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 32201_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08375_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 08375_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.58 +27:29:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.25 +27:57:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.28 +33:22:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.68 +27:36:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07128_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 07128_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.62 +27:25:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.10 +30:16:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:58.348 +29:59:44.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.609 +30:00:24.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:03.050 +30:00:19.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 94788 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3479798.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
### Converted positions of 94759 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3479800.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
### Converted positions of 166985 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3479979.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
### Converted positions of 167542 stars ###
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3479988.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.609 +30:00:24.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:00.609 +30:00:24.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:58.348 +29:59:44.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:58.348 +29:59:44.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0072 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:00.609 +30:00:24.04
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:58.348 +29:59:44.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01373 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Jfo6OjZUR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mJF9dg55hu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rtRV7OHuSU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qD9cl1nxCK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 137 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7Jfo6OjZUR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=226 n_q2=249 n_q3=235 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mJF9dg55hu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=222 n_q2=245 n_q3=237 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rtRV7OHuSU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=7447, passed=94736
Got 94736 stars (including 87194 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 94736 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=229 n_q2=254 n_q3=238 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qD9cl1nxCK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7490, passed=94761
Got 94761 stars (including 87174 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 94761 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=225 n_q2=257 n_q3=238 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-26-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_222810_TTUQ1b1x1_2638394_2oxYvGYw/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:59.44 +27:55:44.2: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:01.23 +34:49:59.9: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:10:04.98 +32:39:29.8: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:51:03.73 +28:56:19.0: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:11.23 +33:37:20.6: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:59.44 +27:55:44.2: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:10:04.98 +32:39:29.8: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:51:03.73 +28:56:19.0: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:11.23 +33:37:20.6: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:59.44 +27:55:44.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5685 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:01.23 +34:49:59.9: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:04.98 +32:39:29.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7016 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:03.73 +28:56:19.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9714 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:11.23 +33:37:20.6: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2100 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:01.23 +34:49:59.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1487 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:42.50 +25:21:38.0: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:35:22.97 +32:12:19.7: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:42.50 +25:21:38.0: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:35:22.97 +32:12:19.7: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:42.50 +25:21:38.0: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1002 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:22.97 +32:12:19.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9337 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:41.87 +26:57:14.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:59.13 +32:15:28.2: 16.09 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:41.87 +26:57:14.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:59.13 +32:15:28.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.09 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:07:59.13 +32:15:28.2: ref_mag=16.09 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.3244 delta=2.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:24.08 +28:37:55.5: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:24.08 +28:37:55.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:34:18.58 +29:27:13.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:34:18.58 +29:27:13.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:00.93 +28:35:57.0: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:00.93 +28:35:57.0: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:00.93 +28:35:57.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6247 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:03:19.12 +24:55:43.9: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:03:19.12 +24:55:43.9: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:19.12 +24:55:43.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8721 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:59.78 +25:25:59.6: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:24:22.00 +31:56:28.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:59.78 +25:25:59.6: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:24:22.00 +31:56:28.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:59.78 +25:25:59.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8878 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:10:26.26 +25:31:36.7: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:10:26.26 +25:31:36.7: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:26.26 +25:31:36.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9808 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:31.47 +29:28:51.3: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:31.47 +29:28:51.3: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:58:31.47 +29:28:51.3: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7357 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:03.03 +25:19:01.4: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:35:42.59 +30:34:29.5: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:12.70 +28:30:11.5: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:03.03 +25:19:01.4: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:38:03.03 +25:19:01.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3999 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:35:42.59 +30:34:29.5: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:12.70 +28:30:11.5: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:35:42.59 +30:34:29.5: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5955 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:43:12.70 +28:30:11.5: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2914 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:45.09 +27:42:38.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:45.09 +27:42:38.9: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:50:45.09 +27:42:38.9: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4929 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:25:15.98 +33:10:52.0: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:09.24 +30:22:14.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:25:15.98 +33:10:52.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:15.98 +33:10:52.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5616 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:09.24 +30:22:14.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:26:09.24 +30:22:14.9: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2276 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15305.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193771.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194247.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194510.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194699.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195547.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52073.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out67957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192071_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192071_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192077_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192077_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:39.95 +26:51:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192080_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192080_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192088_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192088_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192102_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192102_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:01.90 +27:04:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192105_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192105_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192111_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192111_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:18.68 +30:59:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192113_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192113_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:02.76 +28:30:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192114_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192114_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:18.63 +29:11:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192117_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192117_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:04.18 +26:40:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192129_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192129_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:28.00 +31:40:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192130_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192130_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.28 +26:33:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192152_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192152_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:36.97 +31:52:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192213_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192213_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.58 +24:47:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192372_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192372_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:42.13 +27:55:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192617_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192617_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.53 +27:49:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192832_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 192832_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.96 +29:29:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193121_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193121_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.23 +27:38:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193275_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193275_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:16.95 +29:19:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193375_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193375_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193387_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193387_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.09 +32:48:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193433_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193433_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.04 +29:43:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193486_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193486_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.60 +27:12:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193502_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193502_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.69 +27:12:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193556_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193556_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:05.10 +34:09:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193628_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193628_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.90 +25:27:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193634_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193634_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.29 +25:34:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193715_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193715_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193717_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193717_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.29 +32:38:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193730_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193730_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:08.93 +34:08:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193732_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193732_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.12 +32:21:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193771_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 193771_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193826_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193826_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.01 +34:14:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193884_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193884_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.65 +30:33:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193886_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193886_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.81 +25:33:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193947_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193947_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.17 +26:54:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193984_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 193984_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.16 +27:58:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194027_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194027_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.89 +31:14:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194176_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194176_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.38 +33:13:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194198_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194198_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:06.23 +25:37:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194228_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194228_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.59 +26:19:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194247_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 194247_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194250_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194250_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.57 +28:12:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.76 +30:56:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194262_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194262_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:47.16 +28:58:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194273_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194273_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.33 +30:38:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194321_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194321_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.16 +27:02:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194330_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194330_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:29.71 +29:19:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194333_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194333_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.27 +31:07:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194448_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194448_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.06 +25:18:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:25.68 +24:59:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194475_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194475_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.74 +28:32:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194488_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194488_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.28 +34:48:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194501_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194501_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.76 +26:58:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194505_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194505_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.88 +25:19:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194507_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194507_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:35.84 +31:57:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194509_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194509_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:01.25 +26:03:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194510_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 194510_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194524_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194524_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:51.98 +27:10:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194613_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194613_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.91 +25:10:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194643_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194643_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.25 +34:46:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194655_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194655_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.59 +25:50:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194662_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194662_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.11 +27:46:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194669_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194669_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.32 +26:04:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194673_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194673_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.45 +26:19:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194699_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 194699_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:49.08 +25:37:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194811_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194811_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194838_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194838_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:40.99 +32:38:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194880_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194880_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:50.12 +27:27:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194921_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:15.34 +30:35:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194926_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194926_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:44.16 +25:53:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194971_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194971_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:12.28 +26:20:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194981_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194981_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.54 +26:47:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194986_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 194986_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:24.71 +25:21:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195000_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195000_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195005_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195005_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:03.31 +27:09:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195042_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195042_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.85 +25:33:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195046_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195046_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.22 +31:46:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195053_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195053_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:16.88 +26:52:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:39.27 +25:35:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195187_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195187_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:48.90 +34:16:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195202_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195202_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.37 +28:54:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195220_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195220_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:36.76 +30:31:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:08.40 +27:43:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195228_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195228_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:15.41 +33:42:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195270_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195270_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195290_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195290_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.03 +29:53:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195292_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195292_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.28 +32:38:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:45.09 +28:05:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195362_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195362_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:56.73 +27:21:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195400_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195400_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:14.77 +31:35:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195438_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195438_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:44.30 +26:17:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195452_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195452_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.15 +31:15:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195465_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195465_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:19.03 +29:12:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195467_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195467_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:20.39 +34:50:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195468_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195468_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:31.77 +30:51:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195478_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195478_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.57 +27:40:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195518_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195518_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195538_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195538_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:04.20 +28:25:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195547_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 195547_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195583_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195583_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:04.05 +28:04:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195596_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195596_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:25.65 +29:14:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195705_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195705_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:35.59 +28:46:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195742_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195742_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:22.63 +28:12:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195761_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195761_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:27.93 +30:58:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195787_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195787_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:46.99 +30:28:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195817_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195817_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:21.97 +30:06:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195868_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195868_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.83 +31:19:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195927_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195927_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 195948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:46.48 +26:31:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196097_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 196097_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:02.27 +28:24:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:47.95 +26:59:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80592_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 80592_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.68 +30:33:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.25 +27:57:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15305_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 15305_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:32.69 +33:21:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 104221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.71 +27:15:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188663_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 188663_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:18.71 +28:38:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:48.74 +25:58:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.10 +30:16:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.68 +27:36:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:29.43 +31:24:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52073_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 52073_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.45 +31:35:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.40 +26:47:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.58 +27:29:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104378_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 104378_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 119566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 46991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.60 +27:25:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.27 +33:22:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56983_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 56983_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_22-27-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
