This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.3068 2461171.8068 11.32 14:37:45.85 -13:25:01.6
338.74694 41.94261 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.116 Sirona 2 -1 2 11.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:37:45.85 -13:25:01.6: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:37:45.85 -13:25:01.6: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.8068,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.3068 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.3068 2461171.8068 12.07 14:23:28.98 -12:16:40.2
335.44126 44.70589 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.79 Eurynome 1 -1 1 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:23:28.98 -12:16:40.2: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:23:28.98 -12:16:40.2: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.8068,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.3068 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.3068 2461171.8068 12.90 14:15:18.86 -11:52:03.4
333.21568 46.01408 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.599 Luisa 1 -0 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:15:18.86 -11:52:03.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:15:18.86 -11:52:03.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.3068* 14 15 18.86 -11 52 03.4 12.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.8068,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.3068 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.3068 2461171.8068 13.84 14:58:29.20 -14:49:41.0
343.11365 37.93805 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.429 Lotis 2 1 2 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:58:29.20 -14:49:41.0: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:58:29.20 -14:49:41.0: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.8068,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.3068 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.3068 2461171.8068 14.24 14:55:46.18 -12:53:41.2
343.91507 39.88321 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1137 Raissa 1 -0 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:55:46.18 -12:53:41.2: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:55:46.18 -12:53:41.2: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.8068,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.3068 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.3068 2461171.8068 14.38 14:34:44.90 -05:18:10.4
344.39657 49.07041 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1107 Lictoria 2 1 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:34:44.90 -05:18:10.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:34:44.90 -05:18:10.4: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.3068* 14 34 44.90 -05 18 10.4 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.8068,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.3068 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461171.80712019 11.05.2026 07:22:05.184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6619
Objects passed selection criteria: 6617
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6289.25
Average stars matched: 6040.75 (96.0488 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112260 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 02:41:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461093.88465544 22.02.2026 09:13:44.230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461171.80712019 11.05.2026 07:22:05.184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 131
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41073
Objects passed selection criteria: 40978
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38874.8
Average stars matched: 36887.8 (94.8887 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141244 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 02:43:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.80640608
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 569 arcmin.
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 567 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6040 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometverification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
ric_calibration found 6066 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2732912.xyls"...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
Generating wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat from image00001.cat
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2732911.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:09.711 -10:01:49.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6254 stars ###
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 6302 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2733346.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2733349.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2732911.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out2732912.axy"...
log-odds ratio 195.298 (6.56162e+84), 18 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-9.9237), pixel scale 5.97869 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++---+-++++-+--+-++-------+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2732911.solved to indicate this.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field: out2732911.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.521248, -9.921982) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:05.100, -09:55:19.136).
Field size: 15.7944 x 10.5859 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.315 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... log-odds ratio 195.702 (9.82194e+84), 18 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (218.52,-9.93235), pixel scale 5.97867 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-+---++++-+--+++----+-----+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2732912.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2732912.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.512654, -9.930553) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:03.037, -09:55:49.989).
Field size: 15.7945 x 10.5858 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.315 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 02:41 fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 02:41 out2732911.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 02:41 fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 02:41 out2732912.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits)... done!
done!
done!
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2732912.xyls"...
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2732911.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2732912.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7133 degrees of RA,Dec (218.512,-9.93133)
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2732911.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7133 degrees of RA,Dec (218.52,-9.92276)
log-odds ratio 195.702 (9.82194e+84), 18 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (218.52,-9.93235), pixel scale 5.97867 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++-+---++++-+--+++----+-----+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 195.298 (6.56162e+84), 18 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (218.529,-9.9237), pixel scale 5.97869 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++---+-++++-+--+-++-------+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2732912.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2732912.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.516090, -9.935118) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:03.862, -09:56:06.424).
Field size: 15.7796 x 10.5889 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.298 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2732911.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2732911.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.524794, -9.926564) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:05.950, -09:55:35.631).
Field size: 15.7794 x 10.5889 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.297 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 02:41 fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 02:41 out2732912.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 02:41 fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 02:41 out2732911.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 29601 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7393, 955.49] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.58499
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 173.773 (2.94104e+75), 22 match, 0 conflict, 197 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (218.517,-9.93434), pixel scale 5.98678 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+--+------+----------------+-+----+--+-------------+--------+-+--------+--+-------------++--
--> log-odds 173.773
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 434.893 (7.44375e+188), 50 match, 0 conflict, 328 distractors, 52 index.
RA,Dec = (218.517,-9.93434), pixel scale 5.98678 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+--+------+-+--------------+-+-+--+--+-+--+--+---+-+--------+-+--------+--+-------------++-+
--> log-odds 434.893
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 873.1 (inf), 94 match, 0 conflict, 371 distractors, 97 index.
RA,Dec = (218.517,-9.93434), pixel scale 5.98678 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+---+-+--+------+-+-+-----+-----++-+++--++-+++--++-++-++-+------+-+-+---+----+--+----+-------+++-+
simplexy: found 29506 sources.
--> log-odds 873.1
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1842.36 (inf), 198 match, 0 conflict, 291 distractors, 201 index.
RA,Dec = (218.517,-9.93434), pixel scale 5.98678 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-+++-++++-+++-+++++-++-+++-+++--++-+++++++-++-++++---++++++-++++++-+-+++++--++++-++--+++++
--> log-odds 1842.36
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3164.38 (inf), 366 match, 1 conflict, 670 distractors, 377 index.
RA,Dec = (218.517,-9.93434), pixel scale 5.98678 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++-+++-+++++++++++++++--+++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++
--> log-odds 3164.38
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5744.63 (inf), 718 match, 1 conflict, 1101 distractors, 731 index.
RA,Dec = (218.517,-9.93434), pixel scale 5.98678 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++
--> log-odds 5744.63
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10542.1 (inf), 1441 match, 3 conflict, 2464 distractors, 1467 index.
RA,Dec = (218.517,-9.93434), pixel scale 5.98678 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7404, 955.507] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 9.37163
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 155.828 (4.73249e+67), 22 match, 0 conflict, 204 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (218.526,-9.92579), pixel scale 5.98689 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-+-----------------------------++----------+-+------------------+--+---+----------+-------+--
--> log-odds 155.828
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 427.703 (5.60878e+185), 50 match, 0 conflict, 328 distractors, 52 index.
RA,Dec = (218.526,-9.92579), pixel scale 5.98689 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+-++------------------------+---++--+---+---+-+--------++--------+--+---+----+-----+-------+--
--> log-odds 10542.1
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.517222, -9.934852) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:04.133, -09:56:05.468).
Field size: 15.7759 x 10.5791 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.3 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.new"...
--> log-odds 427.703
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 876.717 (inf), 94 match, 0 conflict, 324 distractors, 97 index.
RA,Dec = (218.526,-9.92579), pixel scale 5.98689 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++--++++++-----+------+---+------++---++--+---++--+-++-----+-++-----+--+++++--++---++--+-+--+----+--
renamed 'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits created.
--> log-odds 876.717
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1843.42 (inf), 198 match, 0 conflict, 247 distractors, 201 index.
RA,Dec = (218.526,-9.92579), pixel scale 5.98689 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++++++-+++++---+--+++++-+-++-++-+++++-+--+++++++++-+-++++++++-+++-++++++--+++++++--++++++-+-++++
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:03.918 -09:56:08.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6359 stars ###
--> log-odds 1843.42
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3172.49 (inf), 367 match, 1 conflict, 542 distractors, 378 index.
RA,Dec = (218.526,-9.92579), pixel scale 5.98689 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++-++-++++-+++-+++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++--+++++++-+++++++-++++++
--> log-odds 3172.49
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5760.79 (inf), 718 match, 0 conflict, 1350 distractors, 732 index.
RA,Dec = (218.526,-9.92579), pixel scale 5.98689 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5760.79
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10598.6 (inf), 1441 match, 0 conflict, 1857 distractors, 1468 index.
RA,Dec = (218.526,-9.92579), pixel scale 5.98689 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2791191.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
--> log-odds 10598.6
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.525844, -9.926355) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:06.203, -09:55:34.880).
Field size: 15.7759 x 10.5792 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.3 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:05.987 -09:55:37.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6426 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2791921.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:05.987 -09:55:37.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:05.987 -09:55:37.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1029 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:03.918 -09:56:08.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:03.918 -09:56:08.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1020 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:05.987 -09:55:37.67
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:03.918 -09:56:08.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01201 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0nEi0Vbbut
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wRT4GY2Pnq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.87SOqrep33
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IIKVjMoS1E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Loaded 4529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3773 out of 6254 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.850300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.850300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5114 to 226.6963 deg, Dec -15.2979 to -4.6850 deg
Loaded 4529 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3773 out of 6254 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5478 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3043 to -4.6253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5478 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3043 to -4.6253 deg
Loaded 4559 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3695 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3695 out of 6302 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (aperture=6.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.5 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.7 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.7 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0nEi0Vbbut (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=6254
Got 6254 stars (including 5757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=220 n_q2=276 n_q3=241 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wRT4GY2Pnq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 567.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=417, passed=6302
Got 6302 stars (including 5882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=238 n_q2=288 n_q3=230 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.052
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.87SOqrep33 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, passed=6426
Got 6426 stars (including 5999 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6426 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=228 n_q2=222 n_q3=271 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IIKVjMoS1E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, passed=6359
Got 6359 stars (including 5928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6359 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=228 n_q2=229 n_q3=266 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:37:45.85 -13:25:01.6: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:37:45.85 -13:25:01.6: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20564_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 20564_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20592_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 20592_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:54:58.84 -05:38:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20597_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 20597_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:33.91 -09:31:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
14:37:45.85 -13:25:01.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 569 arcmin.
The guess is 567 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:05.987 -09:55:37.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:03.918 -09:56:08.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:09.711 -10:01:49.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 39231 stars ###
### Converted positions of 37655 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 39591 stars ###
### Converted positions of 40722 stars ###
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2925400.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2925402.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2925401.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2925456.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:05.987 -09:55:37.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:05.987 -09:55:37.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1029 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:03.918 -09:56:08.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:21.145 -10:00:32.83
Second-epoch image center 14:34:03.918 -09:56:08.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1020 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:05.987 -09:55:37.67
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:03.918 -09:56:08.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01201 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DiOOzZALIY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ihSXnU5vzw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NKAkqadE5H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.teyI5c1HXr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3575 out of 3952 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3952 out of 40722 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.701900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.701900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.04
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.04
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.4556 to 226.7070 deg, Dec -15.3009 to -4.6848 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3575 out of 3952 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3952 out of 40722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 37655 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5434 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.6171 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5434 to 226.6969 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.6171 deg
Loaded 4571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3548 out of 3862 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3862 out of 37655 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DiOOzZALIY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1712, passed=40709
Got 40709 stars (including 38929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=224 n_q2=273 n_q3=237 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ihSXnU5vzw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 567.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1689, passed=37637
Got 37637 stars (including 35895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=241 n_q2=297 n_q3=206 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NKAkqadE5H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2003, passed=39212
Got 39212 stars (including 37148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=232 n_q2=221 n_q3=272 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.teyI5c1HXr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1964, passed=39567
Got 39567 stars (including 37536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39567 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=231 n_q2=226 n_q3=270 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-21-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_022304_TTUQ1b1x1_3383195_2STDPIL4/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:35:17.91 -13:58:12.1: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:02:26.64 -11:01:36.3: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:39:59.91 -06:00:10.0: 14.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:03:31.87 -11:12:59.5: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:26:36.93 -04:43:51.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:43:28.54 -08:28:00.2: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:26:36.93 -04:43:51.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:36.93 -04:43:51.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:23:28.98 -12:16:40.2: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:39:59.91 -06:00:10.0: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:35:17.91 -13:58:12.1: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:43:28.54 -08:28:00.2: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:59.91 -06:00:10.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2758 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:03:31.87 -11:12:59.5: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:17.91 -13:58:12.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2489 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:31.87 -11:12:59.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8653 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:28.54 -08:28:00.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5115 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:02:26.64 -11:01:36.3: 13.95 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:26.64 -11:01:36.3: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3067 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:41:42.40 -05:31:38.1: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:23:28.98 -12:16:40.2: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:41:42.40 -05:31:38.1: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:42.40 -05:31:38.1: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8746 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:15:18.86 -11:52:03.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:19:14.84 -08:44:00.6: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:16:19.89 -04:43:12.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:16:19.89 -04:43:12.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:19.89 -04:43:12.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:58:29.20 -14:49:41.0: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:19:39.03 -05:09:38.9: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:29:40.54 -05:57:19.5: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:15:18.86 -11:52:03.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:19:14.84 -08:44:00.6: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:14.84 -08:44:00.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7588 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:58:29.20 -14:49:41.0: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:19:39.03 -05:09:38.9: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:55:46.18 -12:53:41.2: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:18:10.98 -09:47:21.2: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:29:40.54 -05:57:19.5: 14.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:39.03 -05:09:38.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7639 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:50.71 -07:24:43.6: 14.47 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:40.54 -05:57:19.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0524 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:50.71 -07:24:43.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:50.71 -07:24:43.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:55.78 -05:56:22.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:55:46.18 -12:53:41.2: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:55.78 -05:56:22.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:55.78 -05:56:22.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:18:10.98 -09:47:21.2: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:10.98 -09:47:21.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9683 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:54:56.78 -14:59:45.7: 14.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:34:44.90 -05:18:10.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:01:58.57 -14:12:55.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:04:00.07 -09:15:04.5: 14.82 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:01:58.57 -14:12:55.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:58.57 -14:12:55.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:54:56.78 -14:59:45.7: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:56.78 -14:59:45.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3256 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:34:44.90 -05:18:10.4: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:04:00.07 -09:15:04.5: 14.96 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:00.07 -09:15:04.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3889 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:58:14.05 -15:05:13.9: 14.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:26:17.64 -06:27:46.8: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:21:27.74 -05:14:38.6: 14.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:58:14.05 -15:05:13.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:14.05 -15:05:13.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:26:17.64 -06:27:46.8: 15.23 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:21:27.74 -05:14:38.6: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:17.64 -06:27:46.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3703 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:27.74 -05:14:38.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4037 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:02:10.13 -14:47:56.8: 14.66 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:53:20.14 -12:32:12.3: 14.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:53:20.14 -12:32:12.3: 14.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:20.14 -12:32:12.3: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4068 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:59:43.63 -15:01:30.9: 14.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:02:10.13 -14:47:56.8: 14.69 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:57:56.00 -13:03:48.2: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:10.13 -14:47:56.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3011 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:13:30.03 -05:13:37.9: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:59:43.63 -15:01:30.9: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:43.63 -15:01:30.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1491 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:57:56.00 -13:03:48.2: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:56.00 -13:03:48.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4091 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:13:30.03 -05:13:37.9: 14.78 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:30.03 -05:13:37.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3555 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:03:57.11 -07:15:09.8: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:03:57.11 -07:15:09.8: 14.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:57.11 -07:15:09.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4537 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:56:55.13 -14:56:37.2: 14.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:11:27.17 -07:36:42.7: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:46.07 -05:50:58.0: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:46.07 -05:50:58.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:46.07 -05:50:58.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:56:55.13 -14:56:37.2: 14.97 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:00:34.29 -09:11:37.9: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:55.13 -14:56:37.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3765 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:11:27.17 -07:36:42.7: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:27.17 -07:36:42.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4111 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:00:34.29 -09:11:37.9: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:34.29 -09:11:37.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4556 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:53:40.43 -06:06:24.9: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:37:28.72 -06:03:29.4: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:00:35.68 -12:54:46.2: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:53:40.43 -06:06:24.9: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:40.43 -06:06:24.9: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4600 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:52:50.48 -14:56:58.2: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:22:24.76 -07:37:56.0: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:37:28.72 -06:03:29.4: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:28.72 -06:03:29.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2488 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:00:35.68 -12:54:46.2: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:35.68 -12:54:46.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4558 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:52:50.48 -14:56:58.2: 14.42 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:50.48 -14:56:58.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4886 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:22:24.76 -07:37:56.0: 15.35 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:22:24.76 -07:37:56.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4643 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:30:00.12 -07:04:06.6: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:30:00.12 -07:04:06.6: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:00.12 -07:04:06.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4634 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:04:02.80 -07:36:53.4: 14.99 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:48:33.54 -06:30:58.8: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:04:25.11 -07:23:26.9: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:15.60 -06:11:07.2: 14.71 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:04:02.80 -07:36:53.4: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:02.80 -07:36:53.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6058 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:48:33.54 -06:30:58.8: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:33.54 -06:30:58.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5449 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:04:25.11 -07:23:26.9: 14.74 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:25.11 -07:23:26.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5910 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:15.60 -06:11:07.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:15.60 -06:11:07.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:02:55.21 -12:00:13.6: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:02:55.21 -12:00:13.6: 14.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:55.21 -12:00:13.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3871 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:01:25.15 -06:05:02.4: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:07:08.80 -14:17:23.1: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:05:23.72 -05:16:32.7: 14.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:05:23.72 -05:16:32.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:23.72 -05:16:32.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:53:21.58 -06:07:18.5: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:01:25.15 -06:05:02.4: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:25.15 -06:05:02.4: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5453 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:53:13.02 -09:41:18.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:07:08.80 -14:17:23.1: 14.57 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:08.80 -14:17:23.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4794 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:53:21.58 -06:07:18.5: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:21.58 -06:07:18.5: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6112 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:10:39.55 -13:55:38.4: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:04:29.36 -06:01:35.4: 14.96 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:53:13.02 -09:41:18.2: 15.54 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:53:13.02 -09:41:18.2: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=14.5660 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:54:04.33 -12:43:14.1: 14.94 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:10:39.55 -13:55:38.4: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:39.55 -13:55:38.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3946 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:57:13.96 -14:15:45.3: 14.70 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:04:29.36 -06:01:35.4: 15.01 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:29.36 -06:01:35.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4927 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:03:20.31 -12:14:12.1: 15.02 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:46:07.88 -13:47:05.0: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:44:46.87 -13:28:39.1: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:54:04.33 -12:43:14.1: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:04.33 -12:43:14.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5692 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:57:13.96 -14:15:45.3: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:13.96 -14:15:45.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4845 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:03:20.31 -12:14:12.1: 14.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:20.31 -12:14:12.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5386 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:46:07.88 -13:47:05.0: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:07.88 -13:47:05.0: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5383 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:44:46.87 -13:28:39.1: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:46.87 -13:28:39.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4705 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:20:06.84 -05:44:25.5: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:57:15.50 -14:03:31.8: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:47:49.27 -07:01:58.6: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:56:59.34 -06:03:38.7: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:11:59.98 -14:22:51.9: 15.07 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:20:06.84 -05:44:25.5: 15.21 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:57:15.50 -14:03:31.8: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:06.84 -05:44:25.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4641 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:15.50 -14:03:31.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3813 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:07:47.28 -08:29:08.3: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:47:49.27 -07:01:58.6: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:49.27 -07:01:58.6: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6319 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:53:59.47 -05:08:17.7: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:11:56.94 -07:29:39.5: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:56:59.34 -06:03:38.7: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:59.34 -06:03:38.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4708 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:35:18.88 -07:05:00.9: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:11:59.98 -14:22:51.9: 14.89 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:59.98 -14:22:51.9: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4478 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:12:55.64 -12:48:56.0: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:07:47.28 -08:29:08.3: 14.98 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:47.28 -08:29:08.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5731 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:53:59.47 -05:08:17.7: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:11:56.94 -07:29:39.5: 15.30 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:56.94 -07:29:39.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5989 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:59.47 -05:08:17.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5930 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:35:18.88 -07:05:00.9: 15.36 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:18.88 -07:05:00.9: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5350 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:23:11.95 -05:40:04.1: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:55:16.21 -06:20:48.6: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:12:55.64 -12:48:56.0: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:55.64 -12:48:56.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4342 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:52:13.51 -10:16:34.3: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:51:44.99 -06:44:51.1: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:23:11.95 -05:40:04.1: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:55:16.21 -06:20:48.6: 15.43 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:11.95 -05:40:04.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5280 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:16.21 -06:20:48.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.5704 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:52:13.51 -10:16:34.3: 14.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:48:09.02 -08:00:23.7: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:13.51 -10:16:34.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4528 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:28:12.90 -06:21:24.5: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:05:12.12 -13:16:14.7: 15.03 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:51:44.99 -06:44:51.1: 15.12 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:44.99 -06:44:51.1: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7079 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:44:47.91 -07:40:17.9: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 15:01:58.88 -12:54:40.4: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:13:24.72 -07:02:31.8: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:48:09.02 -08:00:23.7: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:09.02 -08:00:23.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6410 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:28:12.90 -06:21:24.5: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:28:12.90 -06:21:24.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6337 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:05:12.12 -13:16:14.7: 14.46 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:12.12 -13:16:14.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5833 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:44:47.91 -07:40:17.9: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:47.91 -07:40:17.9: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6880 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:13:24.72 -07:02:31.8: 15.41 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 15:01:58.88 -12:54:40.4: 14.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:24.72 -07:02:31.8: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6697 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:58.88 -12:54:40.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5847 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:15:02.75 -12:12:59.7: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:24:25.08 -09:59:52.5: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:03:41.17 -13:27:28.0: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:06:23.85 -10:43:12.8: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:15:02.75 -12:12:59.7: 15.16 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:15:02.75 -12:12:59.7: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6215 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:24:25.08 -09:59:52.5: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:25.08 -09:59:52.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5262 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:20:48.57 -13:07:21.5: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:03:41.17 -13:27:28.0: 14.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:16:46.27 -14:09:50.0: 14.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:41.17 -13:27:28.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4641 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:02:49.43 -10:27:48.3: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-13-44_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 14:02:44.26 -13:19:28.4: 14.78 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:06:23.85 -10:43:12.8: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:23.85 -10:43:12.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5718 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:20:48.57 -13:07:21.5: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:16:46.27 -14:09:50.0: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:48.57 -13:07:21.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5496 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:46.27 -14:09:50.0: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6178 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:02:49.43 -10:27:48.3: 14.34 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:49.43 -10:27:48.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4642 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-44-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits at 14:02:44.26 -13:19:28.4: 14.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:44.26 -13:19:28.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4148 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54703.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53566.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54142.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54441.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53345_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53345_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53347_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53347_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53349_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53349_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53350_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53350_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53358_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53358_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:57.97 -09:16:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53359_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53359_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53361_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:42:44.80 -08:44:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53366_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53366_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:38:45.10 -09:23:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53381_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53381_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53470_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53470_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:45.85 -13:25:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53566_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 53566_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53663_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53663_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:04.12 -11:01:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53675_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53675_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:41.32 -13:58:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53726_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53726_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 53762_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54022_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54097_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54097_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54115_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54142_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 54142_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54187_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54187_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:29:03.78 -06:12:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54288_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54288_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54327_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54327_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:50.14 -07:09:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54342_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 54342_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54352_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54352_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54405_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54405_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54415_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54415_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54419_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54436_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54436_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54441_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 54441_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54448_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54448_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54453_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54453_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:03.75 -05:35:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54468_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54468_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:03.22 -11:07:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54487_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54487_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54489_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54489_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54491_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54491_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54492_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54492_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:52.41 -13:01:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54501_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54501_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:04.53 -13:58:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54512_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54512_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:47.42 -15:09:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54518_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54518_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54529_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54529_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54530_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54530_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54533_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54533_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54535_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54535_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54543_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54543_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54549_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54549_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:05:41.93 -05:37:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54560_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54560_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54561_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54561_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54582_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54582_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54587_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54587_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54606_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54606_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54607_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54607_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54614_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54614_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54623_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54623_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54627_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54627_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54634_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54634_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54642_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54642_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54650_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54659_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54659_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54671_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54671_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54673_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54673_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54681_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54681_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54683_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54683_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54688_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54688_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54689_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54689_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:19.73 -15:07:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54691_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54691_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54697_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54697_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54703_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54703_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:53:13.02 -09:41:18.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.616 6326192471425619328 223.30381375044 -09.68851755027 15.3715 14.9806 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.616#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54711_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54711_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54717_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54717_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54727_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54727_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54731_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54731_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54732_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54732_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54733_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54733_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54735_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54735_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54742_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54742_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:03:16.62 -12:03:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54766_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54766_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54768_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54768_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54790_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54790_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54791_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54791_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54793_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54793_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54799_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54799_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:01.64 -05:48:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54812_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54812_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54817_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54817_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54825_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54825_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54826_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54826_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54829_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54829_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54833_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54833_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54844_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54844_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54858_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54858_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54866_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54866_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54871_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54871_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:13:32.91 -11:19:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54878_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54878_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54879_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54879_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54885_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54885_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54903_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54903_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54907_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54907_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54964_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54964_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54970_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 54970_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55004_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 55004_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55024_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 55024_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55062_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 55062_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55067_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 55067_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55105_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 55105_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55114_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 55114_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55130_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 55130_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21182_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 21182_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_02-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
