This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2529 2461171.7529 14.02 14:44:58.70 -01:51:21.3
350.80224 50.15750 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 0 -0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:58.70 -01:51:21.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:58.70 -01:51:21.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2529* 14 44 58.70 -01 51 21.3 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7529,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2529 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2529 2461171.7529 14.59 14:34:47.25 -05:18:20.1
344.40613 49.06247 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 10.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1107 Lictoria 1 -2 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:47.25 -05:18:20.1: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:47.25 -05:18:20.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2529* 14 34 47.25 -05 18 20.1 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7529,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2529 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2529 2461171.7529 14.71 14:49:43.09 -02:47:11.3
351.21710 48.67598 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.598 Octavia 2 -1 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:43.09 -02:47:11.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:43.09 -02:47:11.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7529,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2529 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2529* 14 29 10.29 +00 10 53.1 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7529,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2529 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461171.75318846 11.05.2026 06:04:25.483 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6894
Objects passed selection criteria: 6881
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5458
Average stars matched: 4810.25 (88.1321 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 01:36:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461171.75318846 11.05.2026 06:04:25.483 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 61
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40139
Objects passed selection criteria: 40034
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33250.2
Average stars matched: 29672.2 (89.2392 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 140004 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 01:39:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.75253578
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 7335 high-SNR stars for plate solving
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 7363 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4108836.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out4108836.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 32.5543 (1.37447e+14), 5 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (218.554,-1.98424), pixel scale 5.95048 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++--+--+---+(best)----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4117.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4108836.solved to indicate this.
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4108832.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out4108832.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 31.9782 (7.72639e+13), 5 match, 0 conflict, 8 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (218.564,-1.99873), pixel scale 5.95039 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---+-+----+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4117.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4108832.solved to indicate this.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.294 -02:00:52.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6283 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6865 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4109346.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4109340.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Field: out4108836.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.565708, -1.979406) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:15.770, -01:58:45.862).
Field size: 15.7333 x 10.5286 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.214566 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out4108832.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.574006, -1.995739) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:17.761, -01:59:44.662).
Field size: 15.7341 x 10.5303 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.211581 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 01:36 fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 01:36 out4108832.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 01:36 fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 01:36 out4108836.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4108836.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out4108836.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6767 degrees of RA,Dec (218.567,-1.97858)
log-odds ratio 243.814 (7.70997e+105), 24 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.572,-1.98998), pixel scale 5.9509 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-+-+-++-++-+-+-+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4108836.solved to indicate this.
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits (fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Field: out4108836.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.564286, -1.981223) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:15.429, -01:58:52.402).
Field size: 15.7151 x 10.5331 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.226645 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 01:36 fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 01:36 out4108836.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits)... done!
done!
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4108832.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out4108832.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6683 degrees of RA,Dec (218.575,-1.99491)
log-odds ratio 243.86 (8.07616e+105), 24 match, 0 conflict, 7 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.582,-2.00453), pixel scale 5.9509 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-+-+-++-++-+-+-+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4108832.solved to indicate this.
Field: out4108832.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.574683, -1.995724) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:17.924, -01:59:44.605).
Field size: 15.7151 x 10.5331 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.227911 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 01:36 fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 01:36 out4108832.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 32256 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4567, 951.254] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 71.8422 (1.58739e+31), 14 match, 0 conflict, 324 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (218.563,-1.98205), pixel scale 5.96024 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+---+------------------------------+---+----+-----+------------+----------------------------
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
--> log-odds 71.8422
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 231.444 (3.27344e+100), 28 match, 0 conflict, 310 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.563,-1.98205), pixel scale 5.96024 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-------+-+-+------------------------------+---+---++-----+-+----------+--+--------+------------+-+-
--> log-odds 231.444
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 479.94 (2.72513e+208), 49 match, 0 conflict, 289 distractors, 49 index.
RA,Dec = (218.563,-1.98205), pixel scale 5.96024 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+--+--+-+-+-------++--+------+--------+--+-+-+--+++-----+-++----+---++--+-+------++-----------+-+-
--> log-odds 479.94
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 900.715 (inf), 90 match, 0 conflict, 264 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (218.563,-1.98205), pixel scale 5.96024 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-++--+-+-++--+--+++--+---+--+-+-+----+--+-+++--+++--+-++++++---+---++-++++--+---++--+----+++-+-+-
--> log-odds 900.715
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1860.94 (inf), 191 match, 0 conflict, 361 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (218.563,-1.98205), pixel scale 5.96024 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-++-++++++++++-++++--+++-+--+-+-+-+++++-+++++++++++-+-++++++++++++++++++++--++-+++-++--+-+++-+++-
--> log-odds 1860.94
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3418.17 (inf), 370 match, 0 conflict, 494 distractors, 374 index.
RA,Dec = (218.563,-1.98205), pixel scale 5.96024 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+-++
--> log-odds 3418.17
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6205.52 (inf), 724 match, 0 conflict, 1244 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (218.563,-1.98205), pixel scale 5.96024 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6205.52
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11379.2 (inf), 1449 match, 1 conflict, 2935 distractors, 1464 index.
RA,Dec = (218.563,-1.98205), pixel scale 5.96024 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11379.2
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.564294, -1.981826) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:15.431, -01:58:54.573).
Field size: 15.7083 x 10.533 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.223486 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:15.629 -01:58:51.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7729 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4115444.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
simplexy: found 32475 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4569, 951.257] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 81.5232 (2.54138e+35), 14 match, 0 conflict, 317 distractors, 14 index.
RA,Dec = (218.574,-1.99655), pixel scale 5.96026 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-----------------------+------------+---+--+---+-----------------------------------+--------+---
--> log-odds 81.5232
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 244.007 (9.35266e+105), 28 match, 0 conflict, 303 distractors, 28 index.
RA,Dec = (218.574,-1.99655), pixel scale 5.96026 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+-----------------------+----+-------++--+--+---+--+----+------+------+---------+---+--------+---
--> log-odds 244.007
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 490.899 (1.56532e+213), 50 match, 0 conflict, 281 distractors, 50 index.
RA,Dec = (218.574,-1.99655), pixel scale 5.96026 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+---------------++--+---+----+--+-+--+++-+--++--+--+----+-+----++--+-++--+----+-++--+--------+---
--> log-odds 490.899
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 910.518 (inf), 91 match, 0 conflict, 271 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (218.574,-1.99655), pixel scale 5.96026 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++--+-+-+-+----+-++--+--++----+--+-+--+++++-+++--+--+----+++++--++--+-++-++----+-++--+-+--+++++---
--> log-odds 910.518
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1862.29 (inf), 191 match, 0 conflict, 257 distractors, 192 index.
RA,Dec = (218.574,-1.99655), pixel scale 5.96026 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++--+++++++-++-++++--+-+++-++-+++++++++++++++++-+++-++++-+++++--+++++-+++++--++++++-++++--++++++--
--> log-odds 1862.29
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3415.64 (inf), 370 match, 0 conflict, 469 distractors, 375 index.
RA,Dec = (218.574,-1.99655), pixel scale 5.96026 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+++++++++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3415.64
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6195.5 (inf), 723 match, 0 conflict, 1309 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (218.574,-1.99655), pixel scale 5.96026 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6195.5
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11362.1 (inf), 1448 match, 1 conflict, 3376 distractors, 1464 index.
RA,Dec = (218.574,-1.99655), pixel scale 5.96026 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11362.1
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (218.574681, -1.996321) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:34:17.923, -01:59:46.756).
Field size: 15.7082 x 10.5329 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.223871 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.122 -01:59:43.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7672 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4120605.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.122 -01:59:43.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:18.122 -01:59:43.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0274 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:15.629 -01:58:51.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:15.629 -01:58:51.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0439 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:18.122 -01:59:43.76
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:15.629 -01:58:51.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01783 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fhLYkRDsOK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CfffqQgYtp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.opYQ0kjcuL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p3rwSARlIW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to +3.3059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to 3.3059 deg
Loaded 4006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3333 out of 3439 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3439 out of 6283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fhLYkRDsOK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CfffqQgYtp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=6283
Got 6283 stars (including 5846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=261 n_q2=207 n_q3=204 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.399
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.opYQ0kjcuL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=7672
Got 7672 stars (including 7199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7672 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=262 n_q2=220 n_q3=187 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.672
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p3rwSARlIW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=7729
Got 7729 stars (including 7266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=267 n_q2=212 n_q3=188 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.773
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:08.16 -03:54:25.4: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:26:49.21 -02:22:45.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:02.73 -04:26:09.5: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:08.16 -03:54:25.4: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:26:49.21 -02:22:45.2: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:02.73 -04:26:09.5: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:08.16 -03:54:25.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3047 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:49.21 -02:22:45.2: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2833 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:02.73 -04:26:09.5: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2242 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21309_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 21309_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:07.20 -00:32:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21312_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 21312_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21365_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 21365_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21368_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 21368_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits was not found.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
The guess is 570 arcmin.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.294 -02:00:52.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.122 -01:59:43.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:15.629 -01:58:51.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 36035 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4151944.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
### Converted positions of 43198 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 42158 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 42284 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4151974.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4151955.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4151956.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.122 -01:59:43.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:18.122 -01:59:43.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0274 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:15.629 -01:58:51.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:15.629 -01:58:51.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0439 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:18.122 -01:59:43.76
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:15.629 -01:58:51.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01783 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GCXYjRjvWW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T8hReoiVXX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OxlddGYuZh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bvvg4keugo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.715350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.715350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to +3.3190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to 3.3190 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3249 out of 3501 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3501 out of 36035 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GCXYjRjvWW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1997, passed=43174
Got 43174 stars (including 41107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=266 n_q2=181 n_q3=215 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T8hReoiVXX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1833, passed=36031
Got 36031 stars (including 34149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=275 n_q2=191 n_q3=213 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OxlddGYuZh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2093, passed=42271
Got 42271 stars (including 40125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.665 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=261 n_q2=210 n_q3=185 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.603
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bvvg4keugo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2116, passed=42146
Got 42146 stars (including 39973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=261 n_q2=204 n_q3=187 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.695
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-03-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_013135_TTUQ2b1x1_4088405_Gz3SVStH/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:24:10.55 -04:36:10.6: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:58.70 -01:51:21.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:07.16 -05:28:35.6: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:18:44.91 +02:00:22.0: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:46.20 -05:16:17.7: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:19.03 +00:31:34.7: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:39:57.58 -05:59:47.5: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:47.25 -05:18:20.1: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:27.76 -01:40:42.5: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:17:08.23 -05:26:32.1: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:24:10.55 -04:36:10.6: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:10.55 -04:36:10.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6032 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:58.70 -01:51:21.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:19.03 +00:31:34.7: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:46.20 -05:16:17.7: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:18:44.91 +02:00:22.0: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:07.16 -05:28:35.6: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:39:57.58 -05:59:47.5: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:19.03 +00:31:34.7: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9708 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:46.20 -05:16:17.7: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4210 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:44.91 +02:00:22.0: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3537 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:57.58 -05:59:47.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7639 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:07.16 -05:28:35.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5943 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:47.25 -05:18:20.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:27.76 -01:40:42.5: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:27.76 -01:40:42.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7571 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:17:08.23 -05:26:32.1: 15.33 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:08.23 -05:26:32.1: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7725 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:32:06.43 -02:47:27.1: 14.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:43.09 -02:47:11.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:10.33 -00:47:59.6: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:16:21.55 -03:10:26.5: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:22.65 -05:29:45.0: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:21:59.27 -04:15:26.1: 15.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:26:41.15 -05:09:33.9: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:32:06.43 -02:47:27.1: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:06.43 -02:47:27.1: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6548 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:43.09 -02:47:11.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:16:21.55 -03:10:26.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:10.33 -00:47:59.6: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:21.55 -03:10:26.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7474 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:10.33 -00:47:59.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8146 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:22.65 -05:29:45.0: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:22.65 -05:29:45.0: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7997 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:21:59.27 -04:15:26.1: 15.76 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:59.27 -04:15:26.1: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9269 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:26:41.15 -05:09:33.9: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:41.15 -05:09:33.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9422 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:21:30.00 -04:08:52.2: 15.92 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:09.00 -01:48:21.7: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:20:42.44 -05:45:45.8: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:16:08.07 -05:50:35.9: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:12.37 -01:20:55.9: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:36:21.86 -03:15:57.8: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:21:30.00 -04:08:52.2: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:09.00 -01:48:21.7: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:20:42.44 -05:45:45.8: 15.38 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:30.00 -04:08:52.2: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.9137 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:09.00 -01:48:21.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8507 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:42.44 -05:45:45.8: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9144 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:16:08.07 -05:50:35.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:12.37 -01:20:55.9: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:08.07 -05:50:35.9: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.9573 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:12.37 -01:20:55.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9213 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:36:21.86 -03:15:57.8: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:21.86 -03:15:57.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9513 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:23:15.76 +00:46:19.1: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:18:09.50 -04:12:36.1: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:22:27.06 -05:45:39.1: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:23:15.76 +00:46:19.1: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:24:11.78 -04:41:55.3: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:18:09.50 -04:12:36.1: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:15.76 +00:46:19.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8392 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:59.94 -04:23:45.0: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:22:27.06 -05:45:39.1: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:09.50 -04:12:36.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9374 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:22:27.06 -05:45:39.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8747 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:59.94 -04:23:45.0: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:24:11.78 -04:41:55.3: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:59.94 -04:23:45.0: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8346 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:11.78 -04:41:55.3: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8528 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:18.14 +00:37:00.9: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:18.14 +00:37:00.9: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:18.14 +00:37:00.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9684 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:15.55 -03:51:42.1: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:35:26.71 -06:10:28.1: 15.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:27.20 -05:41:19.2: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:15.55 -03:51:42.1: 15.34 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:15.55 -03:51:42.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9733 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:35:26.71 -06:10:28.1: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:26.71 -06:10:28.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8398 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:27.20 -05:41:19.2: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:27.20 -05:41:19.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9806 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56222.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58059.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58534.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 52410_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 52415_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52416_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 52416_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 52428_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 52429_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:21.24 -03:07:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 52433_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:22:28.63 +00:49:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 52434_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56222_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 56222_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57809_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 57809_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:30:23.99 -06:13:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58043_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58043_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58059_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 58059_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58186_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58186_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58251_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58251_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58263_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58263_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58534_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 58534_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58549_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58549_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58780_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58780_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58885_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58885_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58912_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 58912_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58945_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58945_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58957_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58957_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58994_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58994_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59006_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59006_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59083_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59083_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59144_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59144_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59154_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59154_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59165_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59165_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59190_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59190_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59232_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59232_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59252_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59252_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59262_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59262_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59320_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59320_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:29:42.16 -02:27:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59328_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59328_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59332_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59332_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59420_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59420_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59478_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59478_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59608_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59608_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59643_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 59643_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-04-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
