This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2418 2461171.7418 13.26 13:07:03.28 +14:01:43.4
319.25121 76.40318 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.234 Barbara 0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:07:03.28 +14:01:43.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:07:03.28 +14:01:43.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2418* 13 07 03.28 +14 01 43.4 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7418,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2418 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2418 2461171.7418 14.49 13:43:56.51 +10:06:30.7
341.44094 68.95719 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.888 Parysatis -0 -0 0 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:43:56.51 +10:06:30.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:43:56.51 +10:06:30.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7418,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2418 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2418 2461171.7418 14.54 13:17:00.71 +11:11:57.5
324.83690 72.97420 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1629 Pecker 0 1 1 15.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:17:00.71 +11:11:57.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:17:00.71 +11:11:57.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2418* 13 17 00.71 +11 11 57.5 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7418,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2418 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2418 2461171.7418 14.45 13:01:47.10 +12:06:47.9
312.61496 74.79019 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.971 Alsatia 0 -1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:01:47.10 +12:06:47.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:01:47.10 +12:06:47.9: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2418* 13 01 47.10 +12 06 47.9 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7418,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2418 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2418 2461171.7418 12.29 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.5
320.19766 75.69071 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" UZ Vir
Type: RRAB/BL
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.577 V 13.701 V 2425004.39900 0.459394400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.5: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2418* 13 08 44.23 +13 24 07.5 12.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
UZ Vir,2461171.7418,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
UZ Vir 20260511.2418 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.92764025 22.02.2026 10:15:38.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
First image: 2461093.92764025 22.02.2026 10:15:38.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Last image: 2461171.74198969 11.05.2026 05:48:17.909 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4822
Objects passed selection criteria: 4821
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4654
Average stars matched: 4427.25 (95.1278 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111252 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 01:03:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.92764025 22.02.2026 10:15:38.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
First image: 2461093.92764025 22.02.2026 10:15:38.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Last image: 2461171.74198969 11.05.2026 05:48:17.909 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 306
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23938
Objects passed selection criteria: 23887
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23145.2
Average stars matched: 22215 (95.9808 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128476 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 01:05:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.74156426
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
The guess is 605 arcmin.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits .... It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Determining astrometry method...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5668 high-SNR stars for plate solving
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
The guess is 570 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/lib/make_outxyls_for_astromet######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
ric_calibration found 5654 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits was not found.
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3101593.xyls"...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
Generating wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat from image00002.cat
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Generating wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat from image00001.cat
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3101591.xyls"...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:20:00.219 +13:59:16.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5872 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:54.968 +14:00:35.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3102014.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
### Converted positions of 5574 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3102012.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3101593.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3101591.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 145.809 (2.10914e+63), 101 match, 2 conflict, 273 distractors, 374 index.
RA,Dec = (199.992,14.0228), pixel scale 5.92083 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-+----++++-------+-------+-------+---++++----+++++-------+--+------------c---+++++---+++++----
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1: solved with index index-4112.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3101591.solved to indicate this.
log-odds ratio 145.184 (1.1285e+63), 101 match, 1 conflict, 274 distractors, 374 index.
RA,Dec = (199.99,14.0247), pixel scale 5.92081 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-+----++++-------+-------+-------+---++++----+++++-------+--+----------------++++----+++++----
Field 1: solved with index index-4112.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3101593.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3101591.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (200.000221, 13.994896) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:20:00.053, +13:59:41.627).
Field size: 15.7236 x 10.5288 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.91 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Field: out3101593.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (199.998005, 13.996868) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:19:59.521, +13:59:48.724).
Field size: 15.7236 x 10.5288 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.909 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 01:03 fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 01:03 out3101591.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 01:03 fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 01:03 out3101593.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits (fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3101593.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3101591.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3101593.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.655 degrees of RA,Dec (199.997,13.996)
Reading file "./out3101591.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.655 degrees of RA,Dec (199.999,13.9941)
log-odds ratio 218.762 (1.01686e+95), 21 match, 0 conflict, 25 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (199.997,13.9875), pixel scale 5.94926 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-+++--++--+--+---+-+-+-+-+-----------+(best)------------------------------------------------------
log-odds ratio 218.481 (7.6741e+94), 21 match, 0 conflict, 21 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (200,13.9856), pixel scale 5.94926 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-+++----+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-------+(best)----------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3101593.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3101591.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3101593.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (199.997676, 13.997405) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:19:59.442, +13:59:50.658).
Field size: 15.7088 x 10.5325 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.909 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out3101591.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (199.999912, 13.995431) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:19:59.979, +13:59:43.553).
Field size: 15.7087 x 10.5325 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.909 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 01:03 fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 01:03 out3101593.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 01:03 fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 01:03 out3101591.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 21444 sources.
simplexy: found 21263 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4649, 951.377] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 61.1145 (3.4809e+26), 13 match, 0 conflict, 193 distractors, 13 index.
RA,Dec = (199.999,13.9982), pixel scale 5.96101 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------------------+--------+-------+------+-----------+----------------+--------------+-+------
--> log-odds 61.1145
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 214.652 (1.668e+93), 24 match, 0 conflict, 182 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (199.999,13.9982), pixel scale 5.96101 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---------+---+-+------+--+-----+-------+------+----+-+----+----------------+--------------+-+------
--> log-odds 214.652
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 529.916 (1.37971e+230), 54 match, 0 conflict, 323 distractors, 54 index.
RA,Dec = (199.999,13.9982), pixel scale 5.96101 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+++---++-+-+-+-++-+-++-++--+-+-+-----++-+--++--+-+-+---++------+-----+--++--------------+-+------
--> log-odds 529.916
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 939.88 (inf), 96 match, 1 conflict, 280 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (199.999,13.9982), pixel scale 5.96101 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+++--+++++-++++++-++++-++--+-+-++--+++++++-+++-+-+-+++-++-----++----++--++-+------+--+--+++----+-
--> log-odds 939.88
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1770.1 (inf), 189 match, 3 conflict, 239 distractors, 190 index.
RA,Dec = (199.999,13.9982), pixel scale 5.96101 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++--+++++++++++++++++++++++++-++-++++++++-++++++++++++++--++++++--+++--+++++++++-++-+--+++-+-+++
--> log-odds 1770.1
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3292.39 (inf), 377 match, 4 conflict, 385 distractors, 383 index.
RA,Dec = (199.999,13.9982), pixel scale 5.96101 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3292.39
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5840.32 (inf), 724 match, 3 conflict, 1593 distractors, 733 index.
RA,Dec = (199.999,13.9982), pixel scale 5.96101 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4646, 951.374] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 73.1985 (6.16196e+31), 13 match, 0 conflict, 188 distractors, 13 index.
RA,Dec = (200.001,13.9963), pixel scale 5.96099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------------+-------------+--------+------++---+---------------+----------------------+----+---
--> log-odds 73.1985
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 213.152 (3.72204e+92), 24 match, 0 conflict, 180 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (200.001,13.9963), pixel scale 5.96099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-------------+--+------+------+-+------+------++---++----+---------+----------------------++---+---
--> log-odds 213.152
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 522.896 (1.23222e+227), 54 match, 0 conflict, 299 distractors, 54 index.
RA,Dec = (200.001,13.9963), pixel scale 5.96099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---++-------++-++--+---+--++-++++-++---+-----+++---++--+-+--+--+---+----------+---+----+--++---++--
--> log-odds 522.896
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 936.877 (inf), 96 match, 0 conflict, 257 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (200.001,13.9963), pixel scale 5.96099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---++--+--+-++-++-++-++++-++-++++-++-+-+++-+-+++++-++-++-+--+-++---+-+--------+-+-++-+-+--++---+++-
--> log-odds 936.877
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1774.36 (inf), 189 match, 0 conflict, 370 distractors, 190 index.
RA,Dec = (200.001,13.9963), pixel scale 5.96099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++--++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++--+++-+-++-+++++-++++++--+++++++++
--> log-odds 1774.36
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3303.42 (inf), 378 match, 1 conflict, 350 distractors, 383 index.
RA,Dec = (200.001,13.9963), pixel scale 5.96099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3303.42
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5850.24 (inf), 722 match, 1 conflict, 812 distractors, 733 index.
RA,Dec = (200.001,13.9963), pixel scale 5.96099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5840.32
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10554 (inf), 1426 match, 3 conflict, 2822 distractors, 1452 index.
RA,Dec = (199.999,13.9982), pixel scale 5.96101 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5850.24
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10579.9 (inf), 1425 match, 1 conflict, 2605 distractors, 1452 index.
RA,Dec = (200.001,13.9963), pixel scale 5.96099 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10554
--> log-odds 10579.9
Got 8 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Got 8 solutions.
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (199.997568, 13.996838) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:19:59.416, +13:59:48.617).
Field size: 15.7033 x 10.5286 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.908 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.new"...
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (199.999797, 13.994868) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (13:19:59.951, +13:59:41.525).
Field size: 15.7033 x 10.5286 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.909 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:59.747 +13:59:38.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:59.212 +13:59:45.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6107 stars ###
### Converted positions of 6129 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3107221.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3107230.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:20:00.219 +13:59:16.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:59.747 +13:59:38.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:20:00.219 +13:59:16.54
Second-epoch image center 13:19:59.747 +13:59:38.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:59.212 +13:59:45.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:20:00.219 +13:59:16.54
Second-epoch image center 13:19:59.212 +13:59:45.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0090 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:19:59.747 +13:59:38.54
Second-epoch second image center 13:19:59.212 +13:59:45.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00293 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qa9kEaoZRO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pRZXP1U8YZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XF1EQGXMVt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y9LN5t7uap
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 191.7478 to 208.6490 deg, Dec +8.1787 to +19.6104 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 191.7478 to 208.6490 deg, Dec 8.1787 to 19.6104 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2874 out of 3006 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3006 out of 5872 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.953300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.953300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 191.7478 to 208.6490 deg, Dec +8.1787 to +19.6104 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 191.7478 to 208.6490 deg, Dec 8.1787 to 19.6104 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2874 out of 3006 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3006 out of 5872 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5574 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 191.7267 to 208.1436 deg, Dec +8.5838 to +19.2795 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 191.7267 to 208.1436 deg, Dec 8.5838 to 19.2795 deg
Loaded 3638 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2937 out of 3019 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3019 out of 5574 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.4 pix Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
2.8 pix fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.8 pix fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qa9kEaoZRO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=372, passed=5872
Got 5872 stars (including 5497 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=265 n_q2=238 n_q3=235 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pRZXP1U8YZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, passed=5574
Got 5574 stars (including 5258 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5574 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=245 n_q2=230 n_q3=250 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XF1EQGXMVt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=347, passed=6107
Got 6107 stars (including 5759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6107 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.604 n_q1=260 n_q2=212 n_q3=263 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.484
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y9LN5t7uap (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, passed=6129
Got 6129 stars (including 5758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6129 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.675 n_q1=257 n_q2=212 n_q3=265 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.539
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:25:35.30 +15:37:19.0: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.6: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:25:35.30 +15:37:19.0: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:25:35.30 +15:37:19.0: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2851 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.6: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4025 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20314.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20312_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 20312_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20314_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 20314_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.522 3737667393532367616 197.18468305924 +13.40229480978 13.2529 12.9115 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.522#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20315_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 20315_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:42:51.34 +14:25:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits was not found.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat from image00003.cat
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Generating wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:59.747 +13:59:38.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:59.212 +13:59:45.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:54.968 +14:00:35.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 937.8'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:20:00.219 +13:59:16.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 26421 stars ###
### Converted positions of 26776 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3217581.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3217580.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
### Converted positions of 28347 stars ###
### Converted positions of 30258 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3217618.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3217655.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:20:00.219 +13:59:16.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:59.747 +13:59:38.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:20:00.219 +13:59:16.54
Second-epoch image center 13:19:59.747 +13:59:38.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0064 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:19:59.212 +13:59:45.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:20:00.219 +13:59:16.54
Second-epoch image center 13:19:59.212 +13:59:45.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0090 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:19:59.747 +13:59:38.54
Second-epoch second image center 13:19:59.212 +13:59:45.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00293 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ElncqbYVWA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yOub5oL8o0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YoNPx9cuGz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DEiBK7GmRJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits and wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30258 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 191.7113 to 208.6506 deg, Dec +8.0904 to +19.6103 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 191.7113 to 208.6506 deg, Dec 8.0904 to 19.6103 deg
Loaded 4057 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2785 out of 3023 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3023 out of 30258 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.827000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.827000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30258 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 191.7113 to 208.6506 deg, Dec +8.0904 to +19.6103 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 191.7113 to 208.6506 deg, Dec 8.0904 to 19.6103 deg
Loaded 4057 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2785 out of 3023 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3023 out of 30258 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 28347 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 191.7068 to 208.1601 deg, Dec +8.5812 to +19.2880 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 191.7068 to 208.1601 deg, Dec 8.5812 to 19.2880 deg
Loaded 3652 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2836 out of 3036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3036 out of 28347 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 177 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.2 pix Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
2.7 pix fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.7 pix fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
15.5 mag. Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ElncqbYVWA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1283, passed=30242
Got 30242 stars (including 28923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=271 n_q2=238 n_q3=223 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits -region wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yOub5oL8o0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1242, passed=28330
Got 28330 stars (including 27054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28330 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.559 n_q1=256 n_q2=224 n_q3=244 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YoNPx9cuGz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1738, passed=26413
Got 26413 stars (including 24653 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26413 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.562 n_q1=270 n_q2=203 n_q3=272 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DEiBK7GmRJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1820, passed=26770
Got 26770 stars (including 24926 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26770 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.675 n_q1=269 n_q2=201 n_q3=270 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.602
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-47-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_005740_TTUQ2b1x1_2234545_44VJyvzV/wcs_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:46:02.22 +15:04:35.8: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:44:48.36 +14:26:01.2: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:46:28.21 +13:21:52.1: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:46:02.22 +15:04:35.8: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:46:02.22 +15:04:35.8: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9350 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:44:48.36 +14:26:01.2: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:46:28.21 +13:21:52.1: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:44:48.36 +14:26:01.2: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1156 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:46:28.21 +13:21:52.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2615 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:07:03.28 +14:01:43.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:07:03.28 +14:01:43.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:37:08.52 +13:35:28.1: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:37:08.52 +13:35:28.1: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:37:08.52 +13:35:28.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9069 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:32:23.05 +14:27:27.8: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:32:23.05 +14:27:27.8: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:32:23.05 +14:27:27.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3022 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:43:56.51 +10:06:30.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:34:55.32 +13:44:00.8: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:36:25.45 +16:51:03.7: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:43:56.51 +10:06:30.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:17:00.71 +11:11:57.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:34:55.32 +13:44:00.8: 14.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:34:55.32 +13:44:00.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5617 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:36:25.45 +16:51:03.7: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:36:25.45 +16:51:03.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4981 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:17:00.71 +11:11:57.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:01:47.10 +12:06:47.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:45:39.01 +09:48:23.4: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:01:47.10 +12:06:47.9: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:41:00.11 +10:31:12.1: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:45:39.01 +09:48:23.4: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:39.01 +09:48:23.4: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9341 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:41:00.11 +10:31:12.1: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:41:00.11 +10:31:12.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9684 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:46:12.36 +12:22:43.1: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:46:12.36 +12:22:43.1: 15.48 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:46:12.36 +12:22:43.1: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9656 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-15-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0416.fits at 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.5: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_02-50-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:08:44.23 +13:24:07.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2915 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17755.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52456.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52571.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52610.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52386_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:32:25.07 +11:06:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52388_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52389_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52389_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52395_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52395_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52398_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52398_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52400_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52401_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52401_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52402_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52404_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52409_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52409_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52413_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52415_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52416_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52416_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52418_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52419_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52419_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52422_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52424_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52424_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52425_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52425_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52426_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52426_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52427_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52427_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52428_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52430_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52431_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52431_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52434_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52437_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52437_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52441_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52442_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52445_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52445_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52446_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52447_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52447_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52448_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52449_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52449_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52450_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52450_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52451_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52455_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 52456_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52457_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52457_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52461_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52462_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52463_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52463_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52465_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52465_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52466_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52467_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52467_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52469_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52470_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52470_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52473_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52473_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52477_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52479_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52480_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52480_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:18:50.88 +11:51:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52483_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52484_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52484_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52486_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52491_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52493_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52493_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52495_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52495_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52496_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52496_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52498_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52499_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52499_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52500_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52500_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52502_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52503_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52503_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52504_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52507_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52507_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52508_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52509_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52509_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52510_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52511_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52511_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52513_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52514_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52515_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52516_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52516_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52519_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52519_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52520_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52520_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52521_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52521_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52523_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52524_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52526_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52526_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52527_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52527_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52529_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52532_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52533_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52535_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52536_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52538_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52539_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52541_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52542_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52542_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52546_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52548_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52549_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52551_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52554_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52555_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52555_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52556_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52556_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:40:23.60 +12:13:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52559_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52563_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:45:08.25 +17:46:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52564_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52565_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52570_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 52571_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52575_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:41:11.19 +10:36:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52577_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52582_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52583_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52583_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52584_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52587_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52587_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52588_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52589_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52593_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52595_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52597_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52599_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52599_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52600_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52600_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52601_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52602_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52605_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52608_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52608_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 52610_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52613_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52613_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52617_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52618_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52619_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52620_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52620_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52621_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52626_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52627_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52628_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:42:22.23 +15:29:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52631_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52631_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52632_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52632_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52637_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52638_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52646_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52648_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52649_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52649_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52650_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52652_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52655_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52659_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 52659_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52660_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52660_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52661_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52661_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52663_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52665_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52665_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52666_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52666_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52667_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52667_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52671_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52678_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52679_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52685_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52686_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52688_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52691_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:44:17.81 +13:23:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52695_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52697_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52703_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52703_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52704_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52714_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52714_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52720_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52726_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52729_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52730_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52736_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52742_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52757_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52769_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52769_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52778_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52778_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52783_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52791_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52797_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52806_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52841_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52841_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52847_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52896_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52925_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52933_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52933_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52955_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52955_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 52969_fd_Vir-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-48-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks