This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2352 2461171.7352 13.19 11:45:37.22 +13:14:14.7
251.75778 69.27251 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.326 Tamara -1 -0 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:45:37.22 +13:14:14.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:45:37.22 +13:14:14.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2353* 11 45 37.22 +13 14 14.7 13.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7352,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2352 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2352 2461171.7352 13.58 11:29:15.21 +11:28:48.5
247.98494 65.15625 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.595 Polyxena -1 -0 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:29:15.21 +11:28:48.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:29:15.21 +11:28:48.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2353* 11 29 15.21 +11 28 48.5 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7352,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2352 13.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2352 2461171.7352 14.50 11:36:10.69 +15:34:58.0
242.55944 69.06042 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.680 Genoveva -2 0 2 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:36:10.69 +15:34:58.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:36:10.69 +15:34:58.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2353* 11 36 10.69 +15 34 58.0 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7352,14.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2352 14.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2352 2461171.7352 14.89 11:24:39.22 +09:50:18.8
249.00753 63.21362 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.627 Charis -1 0 1 15.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:24:39.22 +09:50:18.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:24:39.22 +09:50:18.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2353* 11 24 39.22 +09 50 18.8 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7352,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2352 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461171.73557826 11.05.2026 05:39:03.962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5959
Objects passed selection criteria: 5957
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5561.5
Average stars matched: 5411.75 (97.3074 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:43:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461171.73557826 11.05.2026 05:39:03.962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 49
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31040
Objects passed selection criteria: 30956
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29415.2
Average stars matched: 28057.2 (95.3833 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132192 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:44:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.73491405
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5210 high-SNR stars for plate solving
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5255 high-SNR stars for plate solving
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits was not found.
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3909391.xyls"...
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3909394.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:22.632 +14:00:35.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5851 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3909827.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
### Converted positions of 5845 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3909859.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3909391.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out3909394.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 69.9396 (2.36791e+30), 28 match, 0 conflict, 83 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (173.293,14.0546), pixel scale 5.9675 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------++--+---++--++-++---+---+--++---+---++-++-------+---+---+----------------+--+---+--+-+--------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 69.2075 (1.13873e+30), 28 match, 0 conflict, 83 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (173.289,14.049), pixel scale 5.9675 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------++--+---++--+--++---+---++-++---+---++-++-------+---+---+----------------+--+---+-------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3909391.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3909394.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3909391.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.300983, 14.059531) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:12.236, +14:03:34.310).
Field size: 15.7986 x 10.5785 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.424 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... Field: out3909394.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.296974, 14.053971) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:11.274, +14:03:14.297).
Field size: 15.7985 x 10.5784 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.424 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:43 fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:43 out3909394.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:43 fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:43 out3909391.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3909394.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3909391.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3909394.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7417 degrees of RA,Dec (173.296,14.0532)
log-odds ratio 105.57 (7.05319e+45), 16 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (173.291,14.0557), pixel scale 5.97954 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+-+-++-+--+++--+-+-----++++(best)----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out3909391.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7417 degrees of RA,Dec (173.3,14.0588)
log-odds ratio 107.32 (4.06152e+46), 16 match, 0 conflict, 12 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (173.295,14.0613), pixel scale 5.97962 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+-+-++-+--++++-----+-++++(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3909394.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3909391.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3909391.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.301240, 14.060667) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:12.298, +14:03:38.402).
Field size: 15.7713 x 10.5769 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.42 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field: out3909394.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.297257, 14.055081) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:11.342, +14:03:18.292).
Field size: 15.7715 x 10.577 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.42 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:43 fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:43 out3909391.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:43 fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:43 out3909394.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 23264 sources.
simplexy: found 23287 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7466, 955.601] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 139.249 (2.98727e+60), 25 match, 0 conflict, 379 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (173.298,14.0559), pixel scale 5.98747 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------+--------------------------++------------+++--------------------+-------------+-------
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7476, 955.615] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 117.622 (1.20986e+51), 25 match, 0 conflict, 403 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (173.302,14.0614), pixel scale 5.98756 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------+--+--------------------------------------------+----+----+-------------------+-+--+--
--> log-odds 139.249
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 379.86 (9.35383e+164), 45 match, 0 conflict, 359 distractors, 46 index.
RA,Dec = (173.298,14.0559), pixel scale 5.98747 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+------+---------------------+----++-------+----+++-+-----------+------+-++-+-----+--+------+
--> log-odds 117.622
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 352.24 (9.46216e+152), 45 match, 0 conflict, 383 distractors, 46 index.
RA,Dec = (173.302,14.0614), pixel scale 5.98756 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------------++--+--------------------------+-----------------+----+----+-----+---+---------+-++-++-
--> log-odds 379.86
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 844.455 (inf), 89 match, 0 conflict, 432 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (173.298,14.0559), pixel scale 5.98747 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+++------+--+--+---------------+----++---+---+++--+++++-----+----+++-++--++++-++---+++-+-+---++
--> log-odds 352.24
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 822.91 (inf), 89 match, 0 conflict, 480 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (173.302,14.0614), pixel scale 5.98756 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--------+++--++--+-----+-----++---------+-+---------------++--+++---+-+---+---+++--++--++-++-++-
--> log-odds 844.455
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1826.68 (inf), 189 match, 0 conflict, 372 distractors, 192 index.
RA,Dec = (173.298,14.0559), pixel scale 5.98747 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++++++-+-++-++--+++-++-+++++++-+++++++++-++-+-++++++++++--++++++-+++++++++++++-+++--+++++-+--+++
--> log-odds 822.91
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1799 (inf), 188 match, 0 conflict, 405 distractors, 192 index.
RA,Dec = (173.302,14.0614), pixel scale 5.98756 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++++-++--+++-+++-+++++--++-+-+++-++++--+-+++--+-+-++-+++--+++-+++++-++-+-++++-+++++-+++-++-++++++
--> log-odds 1826.68
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3456.16 (inf), 379 match, 0 conflict, 505 distractors, 385 index.
RA,Dec = (173.298,14.0559), pixel scale 5.98747 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++
--> log-odds 1799
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3447.11 (inf), 379 match, 0 conflict, 544 distractors, 386 index.
RA,Dec = (173.302,14.0614), pixel scale 5.98756 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++
--> log-odds 3456.16
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6043.58 (inf), 708 match, 0 conflict, 1045 distractors, 716 index.
RA,Dec = (173.298,14.0559), pixel scale 5.98747 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3447.11
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6040.1 (inf), 709 match, 1 conflict, 1675 distractors, 718 index.
RA,Dec = (173.302,14.0614), pixel scale 5.98756 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6043.58
--> log-odds 6040.1
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11264.4 (inf), 1437 match, 0 conflict, 2104 distractors, 1451 index.
RA,Dec = (173.298,14.0559), pixel scale 5.98747 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11252.1 (inf), 1437 match, 1 conflict, 1846 distractors, 1453 index.
RA,Dec = (173.302,14.0614), pixel scale 5.98756 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11264.4
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.295919, 14.054944) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:11.020, +14:03:17.799).
Field size: 15.774 x 10.5753 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.424 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.new"...
--> log-odds 11252.1
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (173.299900, 14.060530) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:33:11.976, +14:03:37.910).
Field size: 15.774 x 10.5753 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.424 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:10.802 +14:03:15.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:11.758 +14:03:35.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5361 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3916320.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
### Converted positions of 5309 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3916329.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:10.802 +14:03:15.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:10.802 +14:03:15.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0660 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:11.758 +14:03:35.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:11.758 +14:03:35.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0684 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:10.802 +14:03:15.00
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:11.758 +14:03:35.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00679 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KqBTqcF4UF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6BIKJ3LMvr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DtIwqUTkUQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NX3AHiFSOR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec +8.5231 to +19.3318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec 8.5231 to 19.3318 deg
Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2962 out of 3141 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3141 out of 5851 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KqBTqcF4UF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845
Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=249 n_q2=272 n_q3=235 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6BIKJ3LMvr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851
Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=257 n_q2=269 n_q3=229 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DtIwqUTkUQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, passed=5361
Got 5361 stars (including 5000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=205 n_q2=217 n_q3=279 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NX3AHiFSOR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, passed=5309
Got 5309 stars (including 4939 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5309 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=208 n_q2=209 n_q3=282 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20413_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20413_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:03.72 +12:09:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20435_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:12.17 +17:39:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20460_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20460_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:49.80 +11:23:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20468_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20468_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:38.24 +16:33:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:40.12 +16:51:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits was not found.
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits created.
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:11.758 +14:03:35.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:22.632 +14:00:35.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:10.802 +14:03:15.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 30117 stars ###
### Converted positions of 29279 stars ###
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 29145 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 30089 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3930192.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3930173.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3930174.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3930198.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:10.802 +14:03:15.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:10.802 +14:03:15.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0660 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:11.758 +14:03:35.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:11.758 +14:03:35.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0684 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:10.802 +14:03:15.00
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:11.758 +14:03:35.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00679 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DoCNfKEXAw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yQAtLM2WhV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tH7nqqGVKS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lrQJT7U7uJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec +8.4752 to +19.3348 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec 8.4752 to 19.3348 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2876 out of 3175 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3175 out of 30117 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 37 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DoCNfKEXAw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, passed=30074
Got 30074 stars (including 28759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=244 n_q2=273 n_q3=235 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yQAtLM2WhV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1200, passed=30099
Got 30099 stars (including 28847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=252 n_q2=273 n_q3=231 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tH7nqqGVKS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1082, passed=29132
Got 29132 stars (including 27987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=207 n_q2=222 n_q3=285 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lrQJT7U7uJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1084, passed=29268
Got 29268 stars (including 28133 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=215 n_q2=218 n_q3=280 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-38-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_004004_TTUQ1b1x1_3801764_RPvLwtb3/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:29:15.21 +11:28:48.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:45:37.22 +13:14:14.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:45:50.16 +15:35:23.9: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:26:34.01 +15:29:18.8: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:36:10.69 +15:34:58.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:29:15.21 +11:28:48.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:45:50.16 +15:35:23.9: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:45:50.16 +15:35:23.9: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.9524 delta=-0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:45:37.22 +13:14:14.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:26:34.01 +15:29:18.8: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:34.01 +15:29:18.8: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5997 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:36:10.69 +15:34:58.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:41:37.31 +13:22:04.1: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:52:13.22 +18:11:20.9: 14.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:55:09.64 +11:10:35.6: 15.85 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:41:37.31 +13:22:04.1: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:41:37.31 +13:22:04.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7072 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:26:53.62 +18:14:26.4: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:55:09.64 +11:10:35.6: 15.47 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:09.64 +11:10:35.6: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.7374 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:52:13.22 +18:11:20.9: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:52:13.22 +18:11:20.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7370 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:26:53.62 +18:14:26.4: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:53.62 +18:14:26.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8618 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 12:02:36.91 +17:53:20.3: 15.59 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 12:02:37.18 +18:22:08.9: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 12:04:15.58 +16:04:02.6: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:55:16.62 +17:29:15.1: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 12:02:36.91 +17:53:20.3: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:36.91 +17:53:20.3: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9351 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 12:02:37.18 +18:22:08.9: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:37.18 +18:22:08.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9274 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 12:02:31.91 +10:29:21.8: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 12:04:15.58 +16:04:02.6: 15.36 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:13:48.67 +16:59:37.4: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:04:15.58 +16:04:02.6: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9909 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:55:16.62 +17:29:15.1: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:16.62 +17:29:15.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8748 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:24:39.22 +09:50:18.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 12:02:31.91 +10:29:21.8: 15.41 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:31.91 +10:29:21.8: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9664 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:13:48.67 +16:59:37.4: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:13:48.67 +16:59:37.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.8499 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:24:39.22 +09:50:18.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52514.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52650.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53049.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52109_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52109_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52118_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52118_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:05.48 +14:51:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52119_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52119_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52173_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52173_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:36.44 +16:28:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 52514_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52557_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:56:28.13 +12:20:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 52650_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52678_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:43:39.40 +10:42:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52795_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52795_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:44:59.39 +17:08:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52800_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:53:10.90 +18:23:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52848_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:23.73 +16:05:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52954_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 52954_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:39.31 +13:17:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 53049_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53070_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53070_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:53.95 +11:39:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53096_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53096_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:19.72 +10:24:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53172_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53172_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:28.76 +18:08:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53200_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:57:03.66 +09:27:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53209_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:54.62 +16:41:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53220_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53220_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53245_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53245_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53246_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53246_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53322_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53322_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:32.47 +09:34:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53324_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53340_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53340_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:41:25.92 +12:15:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53378_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53378_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:07.06 +10:06:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53382_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53382_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:46:02.15 +12:20:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53412_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53412_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53417_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53417_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53436_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53436_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53440_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53440_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:55:29.93 +11:02:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53450_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53515_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53520_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 53520_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53552_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 53552_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15931_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 15931_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:40.09 +16:51:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15641_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 15641_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-39-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
