This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 10.46 11:37:52.66 +02:10:32.1
264.59102 59.45591 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -1 0 1 10.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:37:52.66 +02:10:32.1: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:37:52.66 +02:10:32.1: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 11 37 52.66 +02 10 32.1 10.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 12.62 12:05:43.54 -01:41:44.6
280.21591 59.14501 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.204 Kallisto 0 1 1 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:43.54 -01:41:44.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:43.54 -01:41:44.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 12 05 43.54 -01 41 44.6 12.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 12.99 11:53:32.41 +01:16:53.6
272.27011 60.65936 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.122 Gerda -0 1 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:53:32.41 +01:16:53.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:53:32.41 +01:16:53.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 11 53 32.41 +01 16 53.6 13.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 13.13 12:16:55.41 -03:05:40.6
286.19609 58.65114 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.184 Dejopeja 0 0 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:16:55.41 -03:05:40.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:16:55.41 -03:05:40.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 12 16 55.41 -03 05 40.6 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 13.28 12:22:02.53 +01:58:18.2
286.05428 63.87602 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.238 Hypatia 0 1 1 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:22:02.53 +01:58:18.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:22:02.53 +01:58:18.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 12 22 02.53 +01 58 18.2 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 14.04 11:55:15.72 -01:44:30.4
275.59512 58.11690 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.109 Felicitas 0 1 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:55:15.72 -01:44:30.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:55:15.72 -01:44:30.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 11 55 15.72 -01 44 30.4 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 14.63 12:29:41.25 -01:55:31.9
291.85089 60.47742 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.321 Florentina 1 1 1 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:29:41.25 -01:55:31.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:29:41.25 -01:55:31.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 12 29 41.25 -01 55 31.9 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 14.41 11:38:33.91 -05:01:32.4
271.49265 53.33882 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.193 Ambrosia -1 0 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:38:33.91 -05:01:32.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:38:33.91 -05:01:32.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 11 38 33.91 -05 01 32.4 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,14.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 14.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 11.2290 2461171.7290 14.71 11:59:53.82 -01:49:09.9
277.67945 58.50244 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.766 Moguntia 0 1 1 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:59:53.82 -01:49:09.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:59:53.82 -01:49:09.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 11.2290* 11 59 53.82 -01 49 09.9 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461171.7290,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260511.2290 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
First image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Last image: 2461171.72943847 11.05.2026 05:30:13.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5629
Objects passed selection criteria: 5629
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5476.5
Average stars matched: 5321.25 (97.1652 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111668 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:32:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
First image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Last image: 2461171.72943847 11.05.2026 05:30:13.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 39
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32542
Objects passed selection criteria: 32440
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31763
Average stars matched: 30152.2 (94.9288 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 10 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-44-gd532a530
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 11 00:33:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461171.72859757
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5121 high-SNR stars for plate solving
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits was not found.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5079 high-SNR stars for plate solving
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2038712.xyls"...
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2038714.xyls"...
Generating wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Generating wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5852 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2039327.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
### Converted positions of 5784 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2039361.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2038714.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Reading file "./out2038712.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 77.9883 (7.41111e+33), 9 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (179.957,-1.94519), pixel scale 5.98051 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-+----+-+-+-+-+--+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 77.7893 (6.07402e+33), 9 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (179.945,-1.93408), pixel scale 5.98052 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-+----+-+-+-+---++---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2038714.solved to indicate this.
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2038712.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2038714.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.954091, -1.946951) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:48.982, -01:56:49.023).
Field size: 15.7932 x 10.5783 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.392 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... Field: out2038712.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.941886, -1.935855) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:46.053, -01:56:09.078).
Field size: 15.7931 x 10.5782 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.392 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> 'fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:32 fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:32 out2038714.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:32 fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:32 out2038712.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2038714.xyls"...
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2038712.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2038712.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.73 degrees of RA,Dec (179.941,-1.93663)
log-odds ratio 77.7893 (6.07402e+33), 9 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (179.945,-1.93408), pixel scale 5.98052 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-+----+-+-+-+---++---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading file "./out2038714.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.73 degrees of RA,Dec (179.953,-1.94773)
log-odds ratio 77.9883 (7.41111e+33), 9 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (179.957,-1.94519), pixel scale 5.98051 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-+----+-+-+-+-+--+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2038712.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2038712.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.943021, -1.936366) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:46.325, -01:56:10.919).
Field size: 15.7771 x 10.5854 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.418 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2038714.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2038714.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.955241, -1.947501) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:49.258, -01:56:51.003).
Field size: 15.7771 x 10.5853 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.418 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:32 fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:32 out2038712.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits)... done!
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 11 00:32 fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 11 00:32 out2038714.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits)... done!
done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 24278 sources.
simplexy: found 24214 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7433, 955.551] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3.83565
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 86.071 (2.39975e+37), 20 match, 0 conflict, 493 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-1.94672), pixel scale 5.98716 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+--------------------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-------------+--------
--> log-odds 86.071
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 374.817 (6.03785e+162), 46 match, 0 conflict, 467 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-1.94672), pixel scale 5.98716 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------+-------------+------+-----------+---------------++-+-------+----++++-++-----------++--------
Solving...
--> log-odds 374.817
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 844.618 (inf), 92 match, 1 conflict, 420 distractors, 93 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-1.94672), pixel scale 5.98716 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--+-++-+----+-+---+---+--+---+-+-----+-+-+-+---+----+++++-------+----++++-++--+----+--++++--+----
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7428, 955.543] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.619376
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 95.3337 (2.5286e+41), 20 match, 0 conflict, 453 distractors, 20 index.
RA,Dec = (179.944,-1.93559), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------+--------++-----------------------+--------------------+-------------------+-+---+---+
--> log-odds 844.618
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1805.64 (inf), 201 match, 0 conflict, 312 distractors, 203 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-1.94672), pixel scale 5.98716 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-++++-++++-+++++++++++-+++-+--++-+-+--++-+++-+++-+-+--+++++--+-++-+--++++++++++++-++-++-+++++-+++++
--> log-odds 95.3337
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 373.072 (1.05497e+162), 46 match, 0 conflict, 427 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (179.944,-1.93559), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------+----+---++---+-------------------+--+-----------------+--+---------++-+---+-+---+++-+
--> log-odds 373.072
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 832.019 (inf), 91 match, 1 conflict, 381 distractors, 92 index.
RA,Dec = (179.944,-1.93559), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--++-----+----+---++-+-+----+c-----+--+--+++--+------+-+--+-----++-+---------++-++--+-+---+++++
--> log-odds 1805.64
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3111.91 (inf), 367 match, 1 conflict, 404 distractors, 370 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-1.94672), pixel scale 5.98716 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+-+-++++++-++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-+++++-+++++
--> log-odds 832.019
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1805.45 (inf), 200 match, 0 conflict, 273 distractors, 202 index.
RA,Dec = (179.944,-1.93559), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++-+++--+-+-++++++++++++++--+++++--+++-++-++++++--+++-+++--++--+-++++----+-++-++++++++-+++-+++++
--> log-odds 3111.91
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5758.35 (inf), 735 match, 1 conflict, 1061 distractors, 742 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-1.94672), pixel scale 5.98716 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 1805.45
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3111.91 (inf), 366 match, 1 conflict, 684 distractors, 369 index.
RA,Dec = (179.944,-1.93559), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++-++-+++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 5758.35
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 10448.3 (inf), 1450 match, 0 conflict, 2584 distractors, 1474 index.
RA,Dec = (179.956,-1.94672), pixel scale 5.98716 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 3111.91
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5762.45 (inf), 734 match, 1 conflict, 932 distractors, 742 index.
RA,Dec = (179.944,-1.93559), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 10448.3
--> log-odds 5762.45
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Got 7 solutions.
Verifying WCS of field 1.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.955215, -1.947534) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:49.252, -01:56:51.122).
Field size: 15.7741 x 10.5769 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.401 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.new"...
log-odds ratio 10468.9 (inf), 1451 match, 0 conflict, 2695 distractors, 1474 index.
RA,Dec = (179.944,-1.93559), pixel scale 5.98711 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
--> log-odds 10468.9
Got 7 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (179.942984, -1.936424) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (11:59:46.316, -01:56:11.126).
Field size: 15.7741 x 10.5769 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.401 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.new"...
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:49.040 -01:56:53.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5215 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2131381.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
renamed 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:46.104 -01:56:13.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5254 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2131976.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:46.104 -01:56:13.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 11:59:46.104 -01:56:13.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0853 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:49.040 -01:56:53.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 11:59:49.040 -01:56:53.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0689 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:59:46.104 -01:56:13.93
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:49.040 -01:56:53.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01652 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sf6ISgCxgo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uSIqRu7Xf6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y1VKryJLku
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fl6HYn4rkn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to +3.3108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to 3.3108 deg
Loaded 3755 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3122 out of 3271 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3271 out of 5852 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to +3.3108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to 3.3108 deg
Loaded 3755 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3122 out of 3271 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3271 out of 5852 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5784 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.8081 to 188.1615 deg, Dec -7.7215 to +3.7639 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.8081 to 188.1615 deg, Dec -7.7215 to 3.7639 deg
Loaded 4166 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3130 out of 3252 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3252 out of 5784 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.2 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Sf6ISgCxgo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, passed=5852
Got 5852 stars (including 5404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=243 n_q2=233 n_q3=258 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uSIqRu7Xf6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, passed=5784
Got 5784 stars (including 5364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5784 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=248 n_q2=214 n_q3=265 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y1VKryJLku (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=345, passed=5254
Got 5254 stars (including 4908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=254 n_q2=211 n_q3=268 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fl6HYn4rkn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=348, passed=5215
Got 5215 stars (including 4860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5215 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=250 n_q2=215 n_q3=273 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:08:03.16 -02:24:05.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:37:52.66 +02:10:32.1: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:08:03.16 -02:24:05.0: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:37:52.66 +02:10:32.1: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:08:03.16 -02:24:05.0: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2412 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20531.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 20531_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20541_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20541_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:37:52.66 +02:10:32.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
The guess is 605 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits was not found.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 573 arcmin.
The guess is 573 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits was not found.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Generating wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat from image00002.cat
Generating wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat from image00001.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits created.
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:46.104 -01:56:13.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:49.040 -01:56:53.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 32492 stars ###
### Converted positions of 31018 stars ###
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 33433 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
### Converted positions of 31231 stars ###
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2392838.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2392722.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2392850.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2392765.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:46.104 -01:56:13.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 11:59:46.104 -01:56:13.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0853 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:49.040 -01:56:53.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 11:59:49.040 -01:56:53.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0689 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
ref2=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new1=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
new2=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
reference average sigma_overall=N/A worst_q_ratio=N/A
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality sigma_overall_arcsec not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (1st new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
INFO: WCS quality worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio not available for comparison (2nd new image new=N/A ref_avg=N/A)
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:59:46.104 -01:56:13.93
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:49.040 -01:56:53.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01652 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.taQBSeKqT6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n6qIGSTz78
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zJQxiCQlR6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jKJQ2cSNwc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to +3.3170 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to 3.3170 deg
Loaded 3770 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3039 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 32492 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.767000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.767000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to +3.3170 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to 3.3170 deg
Loaded 3770 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3039 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 32492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33433 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.7993 to 188.2138 deg, Dec -7.7228 to +3.7639 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.7993 to 188.2138 deg, Dec -7.7228 to 3.7639 deg
Loaded 4179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3062 out of 3307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3307 out of 33433 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 37 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
15.4 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.taQBSeKqT6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1375, passed=32477
Got 32477 stars (including 31049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=240 n_q2=231 n_q3=264 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n6qIGSTz78 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1372, passed=33420
Got 33420 stars (including 32000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=242 n_q2=213 n_q3=270 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zJQxiCQlR6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1109, passed=31009
Got 31009 stars (including 29853 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=256 n_q2=212 n_q3=268 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jKJQ2cSNwc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1129, passed=31211
Got 31211 stars (including 30037 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31211 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=252 n_q2=214 n_q3=273 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-29-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-11_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_003104_TTUQ1b1x1_2027258_JslRSvu5/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:53:32.41 +01:16:53.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:05:43.54 -01:41:44.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:18:06.11 -01:50:24.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:00:28.12 +02:33:22.2: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:29:06.01 +02:22:30.0: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:43:35.46 +00:14:40.1: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:16:55.41 -03:05:40.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:55:15.72 -01:44:30.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:22:02.53 +01:58:18.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:53:32.41 +01:16:53.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:43:35.46 +00:14:40.1: 14.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:29:06.01 +02:22:30.0: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:00:28.12 +02:33:22.2: 14.67 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:05:43.54 -01:41:44.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:06.01 +02:22:30.0: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5422 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:43:35.46 +00:14:40.1: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7818 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:28.12 +02:33:22.2: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7607 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:18:06.11 -01:50:24.0: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:18:06.11 -01:50:24.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0003 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:12:57.17 +01:18:39.4: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:16:55.41 -03:05:40.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:22:02.53 +01:58:18.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:55:15.72 -01:44:30.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:12:57.17 +01:18:39.4: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:57.17 +01:18:39.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4640 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:51:06.32 +01:47:24.2: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:29:41.25 -01:55:31.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:38:33.91 -05:01:32.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:29:25.15 +02:39:23.5: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:51:06.32 +01:47:24.2: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:51:06.32 +01:47:24.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3639 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:29:41.25 -01:55:31.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:29:25.15 +02:39:23.5: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:38:33.91 -05:01:32.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:25.15 +02:39:23.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8240 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:18:24.92 -03:04:02.0: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:18:24.92 -03:04:02.0: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:18:24.92 -03:04:02.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7076 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:30:25.67 -01:27:53.5: 15.31 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:12:32.53 -04:42:23.6: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:30:25.67 -01:27:53.5: 15.11 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:25.67 -01:27:53.5: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7168 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:12:32.53 -04:42:23.6: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:29:32.82 +02:38:32.1: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:32.53 -04:42:23.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6594 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:29:32.82 +02:38:32.1: 15.40 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:32.82 +02:38:32.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8749 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:20:37.47 -03:31:58.0: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:34:53.59 -03:22:48.4: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:43:27.42 +02:15:54.6: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:20:37.47 -03:31:58.0: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:37.47 -03:31:58.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7563 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:34:53.59 -03:22:48.4: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:53.59 -03:22:48.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5795 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:43:27.42 +02:15:54.6: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:43:27.42 +02:15:54.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6996 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:28:46.43 +02:05:45.0: 15.57 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:22:30.52 +00:50:32.8: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:10:23.91 +00:37:22.6: 14.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:28:46.43 +02:05:45.0: 15.48 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:46.43 +02:05:45.0: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.8548 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:22:30.52 +00:50:32.8: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:30.52 +00:50:32.8: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7989 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:10:23.91 +00:37:22.6: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:10:23.91 +00:37:22.6: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9016 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:29:55.76 -04:34:23.6: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:10:03.21 +00:32:10.2: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:29:55.76 -04:34:23.6: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:55.76 -04:34:23.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7733 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:55:17.61 -01:46:18.0: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:10:03.21 +00:32:10.2: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:10:03.21 +00:32:10.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9226 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:55:17.61 -01:46:18.0: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:17.61 -01:46:18.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8301 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:14:31.32 -05:57:11.5: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:59:53.82 -01:49:09.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:14:31.32 -05:57:11.5: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:14:31.32 -05:57:11.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7908 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 12:27:11.41 -05:24:53.9: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:59:53.82 -01:49:09.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 12:27:11.41 -05:24:53.9: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:11.41 -05:24:53.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7112 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits at 11:59:41.04 -03:46:41.6: 14.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits at 11:59:41.04 -03:46:41.6: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:59:41.04 -03:46:41.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8428 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54369.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54387.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54605.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54710.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54305_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54305_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54306_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54306_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54309_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54310_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54310_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:48.68 -05:15:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54312_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54312_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:07.96 -03:30:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54319_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54319_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:52.66 +02:10:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54347_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 54347_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54364_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54364_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54369_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 54369_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54370_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54370_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:44:57.43 +02:20:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54387_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 54387_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54390_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54390_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:06:31.36 -04:36:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54393_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 54393_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54520_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 54520_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54576_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54576_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54579_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54579_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54590_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 54590_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54605_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 54605_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54616_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54616_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54628_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54628_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54640_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54640_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54644_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54644_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54650_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54653_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54653_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:59:30.21 -00:44:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54657_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54657_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54658_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54658_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54660_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54660_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54668_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54668_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54669_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54669_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54681_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54681_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54685_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54685_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54689_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54689_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54694_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54694_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54706_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54706_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54710_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 54710_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54735_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54735_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54746_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 54746_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
